Evaluating the hip-flask defence using analytical data from ethanol and ethyl glucuronide. A comparison of two models

•Both ethanol concentrations in blood and urine and ethyl glucuronide/ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood can be used to objectively assess the hip-flask defence.•Previous experimental data are from single dose studies only.•The same models can be used when two doses are ingested, but only when t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForensic science international Vol. 316; p. 110409
Main Authors Höiseth, G., Nilsson, G.H., Lundberg, R., Forsman, M., Kronstrand, C., Nyström, I., Oscarsson, C., Ericsson, E., Cherma, M.D., Ahlner, J., Kugelberg, F.C., Kronstrand, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.11.2020
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0379-0738
1872-6283
1872-6283
DOI10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •Both ethanol concentrations in blood and urine and ethyl glucuronide/ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood can be used to objectively assess the hip-flask defence.•Previous experimental data are from single dose studies only.•The same models can be used when two doses are ingested, but only when the second dose is sufficiently high. Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence. Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180–240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking. All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1. The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
AbstractList •Both ethanol concentrations in blood and urine and ethyl glucuronide/ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood can be used to objectively assess the hip-flask defence.•Previous experimental data are from single dose studies only.•The same models can be used when two doses are ingested, but only when the second dose is sufficiently high. Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence. Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180–240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking. All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1. The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence. Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180-240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking. All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1. The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence.AIMClaimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence.Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180-240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking.METHODSThirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180-240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking.All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1.RESULTSAll subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1.The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.CONCLUSIONSThe present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
Aim Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence. Methods Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180–240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking. Results All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1. Conclusions The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
Aim: Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence. Methods: Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180-240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking. Results: All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/ BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1. Conclusions: The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence.Thirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180–240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking.All subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1.The present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
AimClaimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of two consecutive ethanol concentrations in urine and the ratio between ethanol concentrations in urine and blood. Another one is the concentrations of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) in blood and their ratio to ethanol. The experimental basis for both these models is from single dose studies only. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the kinetics of ethanol, EtG and EtS after ingestion of two repeated doses of ethanol and to investigate the usefulness of the different models for the assessment of the hip-flask defence.MethodsThirty-five subjects ingested a first dose of 0.51 g of ethanol per kilo body weight, and two hours later a second dose (the hip-flask drink) of 0.25, 0.51 or 0.85 g of ethanol per kilo body weight. Ten urine and 17 blood samples were collected and analysed for ethanol, EtG and EtS using fully validated methods. It was investigated if all subjects fulfilled the criteria for recent drinking, according to the two different models, when using the samples collected 180–240 minutes after start of first dose drinking. According to the first model, increase in urinary ethanol concentrations and a ratio UAC/BAC below 1.3 indicated recent drinking. According to the second model, increase in blood EtG concentrations and a ratio ethanol (g/kg)/EtG (mg/L) above 1 indicated recent drinking.ResultsAll subjects in the high dose group fulfilled all criteria for recent drinking. One subject in the medium dose group and nine subjects in the low dose group failed to show increasing UAC and/or a UAC/BAC ratio below 1.3. One subject in the low dose group failed to show increasing concentrations of blood EtG, but all subjects showed a ratio ethanol/EtG above 1.ConclusionsThe present study showed, by the use of experimental data, that both two models used to investigate the hip-flask defence can be used, but only when the hip-flask dose is sufficiently high.
ArticleNumber 110409
Author Kronstrand, C.
Forsman, M.
Oscarsson, C.
Cherma, M.D.
Kronstrand, R.
Nyström, I.
Nilsson, G.H.
Lundberg, R.
Ericsson, E.
Ahlner, J.
Höiseth, G.
Kugelberg, F.C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: G.
  surname: Höiseth
  fullname: Höiseth, G.
  email: gudrho@ous-hf.no
  organization: Oslo University Hospital, Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo, Norway
– sequence: 2
  givenname: G.H.
  surname: Nilsson
  fullname: Nilsson, G.H.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 3
  givenname: R.
  surname: Lundberg
  fullname: Lundberg, R.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M.
  surname: Forsman
  fullname: Forsman, M.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 5
  givenname: C.
  surname: Kronstrand
  fullname: Kronstrand, C.
  organization: Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 6
  givenname: I.
  surname: Nyström
  fullname: Nyström, I.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 7
  givenname: C.
  surname: Oscarsson
  fullname: Oscarsson, C.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 8
  givenname: E.
  surname: Ericsson
  fullname: Ericsson, E.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 9
  givenname: M.D.
  surname: Cherma
  fullname: Cherma, M.D.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 10
  givenname: J.
  surname: Ahlner
  fullname: Ahlner, J.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 11
  givenname: F.C.
  surname: Kugelberg
  fullname: Kugelberg, F.C.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
– sequence: 12
  givenname: R.
  surname: Kronstrand
  fullname: Kronstrand, R.
  organization: National Board of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Genetics and Forensic Toxicology, Linköping, Sweden
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32871451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-172961$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqNkstuGyEUhkdVqsZJ-woNUjfdjAvMADOLqrLS9CJF6qbtFjEM2DgMuFwS-e3LyHEW3iQr4Jzv3Dj_RXXmvFNVdYXgEkFEP22X2ocojXFpiSEuVgRb2L-qFqhjuKa4a86qBWxYX0PWdOfVRYxbCCEhmL6pzhvcMdQStKjyzb2wWSTj1iBtFNiYXa2tiHdgVFo5qUCOs084YffJSGHBKJIAOvgJqLQRztviHOf73oK1zTIH78yolmAFpJ92IpjoHfAapAcPJj8qG99Wr7WwUb17PC-rP99ufl__qG9_ff95vbqtJen7VCPZjBLhkQ50YEPfDoxAhMpwvS6GdsADImzAuqWSaNxRiBnB5Tky2TVSD81lVR_yxge1ywPfBTOJsOdeGP7V_F1xH9bcmswRwz1Fhb868LI0Xf6EOx8ER7AjmHeoRawQHw_ELvh_WcXEJxOlslY45XPkmFBEWtyi9nm0bXqKMUVz3Q8n6NbnUL58piiGENOOFOr9I5WHSY1P0xy3WYDPx_Z9jEFpLk0qu_UuBWFsGYTP6uFb_qQePquHH9RT4tlJ_LHE85GrQ2RZrro3KvACzfIZTVAy8dGbF-T4cpJDWuNmyd2p_Ysy_AePSvd6
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmsacl_2021_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsisyn_2022_100303
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.006
10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.11.014
10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.034
10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.017
10.1093/alcalc/ags108
10.1520/JFS12748J
10.1093/jat/26.6.333
10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90995-6
10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.005
10.1093/jat/34.6.319
10.2165/00003088-200342010-00001
10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.015
10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.021
10.1177/002580249103100307
10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.021
10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.027
10.1520/JFS13208J
10.2165/00139709-200625010-00002
10.1093/jat/bkaa108
10.1258/rsmmsl.43.1.39
10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.10.017
10.1177/002580240204200305
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 The Author(s)
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2020. The Author(s)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 The Author(s)
– notice: Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2020. The Author(s)
– notice: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QP
7RV
7U7
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M2O
M7P
MBDVC
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
7S9
L.6
3HK
ABXSW
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DG8
ZZAVC
DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Toxicology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Research Library Prep
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Research Library
Biological Science Database
Research Library (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet full text
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Freely available online
SWEPUB Linköpings universitet
SwePub Articles full text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
Toxicology Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic



AGRICOLA
Research Library Prep
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1872-6283
ExternalDocumentID oai_DiVA_org_liu_172961
10852_81417
32871451
10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110409
S0379073820302711
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.4L
.FO
.GJ
.~1
04C
0R~
186
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29H
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
9JN
9JO
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFJI
AAHBH
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AARLI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABGSF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUDA
ABUWG
ABWVN
ABXDB
ABZDS
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACIWK
ACNNM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADECG
ADEZE
ADFRT
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADUVX
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEHWI
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AFZHZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGRDE
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJSZI
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALCLG
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
AOMHK
APXCP
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKOJK
BLXMC
BMSDO
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBD
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EIHBH
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FLBIZ
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HDY
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
IAO
IEA
IHE
ILT
IOF
ITC
J1W
KOM
LK8
M1P
M29
M2O
M41
M7P
MO0
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OG0
OGGZJ
OS0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PRBVW
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCB
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPC
SPCBC
SSB
SSH
SSK
SSO
SSP
SSU
SSZ
T5K
TAE
TN5
UKHRP
ULE
WH7
WOW
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
~02
~G-
3V.
6I.
AACTN
AAFTH
AAIAV
AATCM
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKYCK
AMFUW
DOVZS
EFLBG
LCYCR
RIG
AAYXX
AGRNS
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7U7
7XB
8FK
C1K
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
7S9
L.6
3HK
AALMO
AAPBV
ABPIF
ABPTK
ABQIS
UMP
ABXSW
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8T
DG8
ZZAVC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-1c3dc12d6b6b7b94b750116289f6b74b2b157b2f46c5f286027522f4d7c83cfb3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0379-0738
1872-6283
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:51:54 EDT 2025
Sat Apr 29 05:42:45 EDT 2023
Fri Sep 05 08:02:01 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 04:33:31 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 04:14:05 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:59:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:44 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:47:55 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:46:18 EST 2024
Tue Aug 26 20:31:16 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Ethanol
Hip-flask defence
Ethyl glucuronide
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c599t-1c3dc12d6b6b7b94b750116289f6b74b2b157b2f46c5f286027522f4d7c83cfb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073820302711
PMID 32871451
PQID 2462002685
PQPubID 1226354
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_liu_172961
cristin_nora_10852_81417
proquest_miscellaneous_2561542414
proquest_miscellaneous_2439622611
proquest_journals_2462002685
pubmed_primary_32871451
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110409
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110409
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110409
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_forsciint_2020_110409
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Ireland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Ireland
– name: Amsterdam
PublicationTitle Forensic science international
PublicationTitleAlternate Forensic Sci Int
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Gjerde, Normann, Christophersen, Samuelsen, Morland (bib0015) 2011; 43
Iffland, Jones (bib0035) 2002; 42
Havig, Hoiseth, Strand, Karinen, Brochmann, Strand, Bachs, Vindenes (bib0055) 2017; 276
Hoiseth, Berg-Hansen, Morland (bib0060) 2015; 257
Gjerde, Normann, Pettersen, Assum, Aldrin, Johansen, Kristoffersen, Oiestad, Christophersen, Morland (bib0005) 2008; 40
Lostia, Vicente, Cowan (bib0080) 2013; 48
Norberg, Jones, Hahn, Gabrielsson (bib0120) 2003; 42
Jones (bib0050) 1991; 31
Kronstrand, Nilsson, Cherma, Ahlner, Kugelberg, Kronstrand (bib0100) 2019; 294
Hoiseth, Bernard, Karinen, Johnsen, Helander, Christophersen, Morland (bib0070) 2007; 172
Jones (bib0085) 1992; 37
Jones (bib0090) 2002; 26
Jones, Kugelberg (bib0065) 2010; 194
Legrand, Gjerde, Isalberti, Van der Linden, Lillsunde, Dias, Gustafsson, Ceder, Verstraete (bib0020) 2013
Gjerde, Christophersen, Normann, Morland (bib0010) 2011; 212
Brahams (bib0045) 1988; 2
Bogstrand, Gjerde (bib0025) 2014; 240c
Hoiseth, Morini, Polettini, Christophersen, Morland (bib0075) 2009; 188
Iffland, Jones (bib0040) 2003; 43
Jones (bib0110) 2006; 25
Hoiseth, Yttredal, Karinen, Gjerde, Morland, Christophersen (bib0115) 2010; 34
Jones, Schuberth (bib0095) 1989; 34
Gjerde, Strand, Morland (bib0030) 2015; 27
Sidqey, Kristoffersen (bib0105) 2020
Bogstrand (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0025) 2014; 240c
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0085) 1992; 37
Iffland (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0040) 2003; 43
Hoiseth (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0060) 2015; 257
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0095) 1989; 34
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0065) 2010; 194
Iffland (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0035) 2002; 42
Legrand (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0020) 2013
Brahams (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0045) 1988; 2
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0110) 2006; 25
Norberg (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0120) 2003; 42
Gjerde (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0005) 2008; 40
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0050) 1991; 31
Gjerde (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0010) 2011; 212
Lostia (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0080) 2013; 48
Jones (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0090) 2002; 26
Havig (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0055) 2017; 276
Hoiseth (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0075) 2009; 188
Kronstrand (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0100) 2019; 294
Gjerde (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0015) 2011; 43
Gjerde (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0030) 2015; 27
Sidqey (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0105) 2020
Hoiseth (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0070) 2007; 172
Hoiseth (10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0115) 2010; 34
References_xml – volume: 37
  start-page: 21
  year: 1992
  end-page: 34
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: Ethanol distribution ratios between urine and capillary blood in controlled experiments and in apprehended drinking drivers
  publication-title: J. Forensic Sci.
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1765
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1772
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Prevalence of alcohol and drugs among Norwegian motor vehicle drivers: a roadside survey
  publication-title: Accid. Anal. Prev.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 319
  year: 2010
  end-page: 324
  ident: bib0115
  article-title: Ethyl glucuronide concentrations in oral fluid, blood, and urine after volunteers drank 0.5 and 1.0 g/kg doses of ethanol
  publication-title: J. Anal. Toxicol.
– volume: 257
  start-page: 398
  year: 2015
  end-page: 402
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Evaluation of the hip-flask defence by determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 212
  start-page: 102
  year: 2011
  end-page: 109
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Toxicological investigations of drivers killed in road traffic accidents in Norway during 2006-2008
  publication-title: Forensic Sci.Int.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1504
  year: 1988
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Back calculation of alcohol: the "hip-flask defence"
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 31
  ident: bib0120
  article-title: Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications
  publication-title: Clin. Pharmacokinet.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1197
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1203
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Alcohol, psychoactive drugs and fatal road traffic accidents in Norway: a case-control study
  publication-title: Accid. Anal. Prev.
– volume: 43
  start-page: 39
  year: 2003
  end-page: 68
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Evaluating alleged drinking after driving—the hip-flask defence. Part 2. Congener analysis
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Law
– volume: 294
  start-page: 189
  year: 2019
  end-page: 195
  ident: bib0100
  article-title: Evaluating the hip-flask defence in subjects with alcohol on board: an experimental study
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 74
  year: 2013
  end-page: 82
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Measurement of ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulphate and their ratio in the urine and serum of healthy volunteers after two doses of alcohol
  publication-title: Alcohol Alcohol.
– volume: 276
  start-page: 12
  year: 2017
  end-page: 17
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: THC and CBD in blood samples and seizures in Norway: does CBD affect THC-induced impairment in apprehended subjects?
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 15
  year: 2006
  end-page: 35
  ident: bib0110
  article-title: Urine as a biological specimen for forensic analysis of alcohol and variability in the urine-to-blood relationship
  publication-title: Toxicol. Rev
– volume: 240c
  start-page: 21
  year: 2014
  end-page: 28
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Which drugs are associated with highest risk for being arrested for driving under the influence? A case-control study
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 89
  year: 2015
  end-page: 113
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs—an update part I: epidemiological studies
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Rev.
– volume: 194
  start-page: 97
  year: 2010
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Relationship between blood and urine alcohol concentrations in apprehended drivers who claimed consumption of alcohol after driving with and without supporting evidence
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 42
  start-page: 207
  year: 2002
  end-page: 224
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Evaluating alleged drinking after driving--the hip-flask defence. Part 1. Double blood samples and urine-to-blood alcohol relationship
  publication-title: Med Sci.Law.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1116
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1127
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Computer-aided headspace gas chromatography applied to blood-alcohol analysis: importance of online process control
  publication-title: J. Forensic Sci.
– volume: 26
  start-page: 333
  year: 2002
  end-page: 339
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: Reference limits for urine/blood ratios of ethanol in two successive voids from drinking drivers
  publication-title: J Anal. Toxicol.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0105
  article-title: Quantitative determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem and antemortem whole blood using phospholipid removal 96-wells plates and UHPLC–MS/MS
  publication-title: J. Anal. Toxicol.
– year: 2013
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Prevalence of alcohol, illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines in killed drivers in four European countries
  publication-title: Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 229
  year: 1991
  end-page: 238
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Top ten defence challenges among drinking drivers in Sweden
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Law
– volume: 172
  start-page: 119
  year: 2007
  end-page: 124
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: A pharmacokinetic study of ethyl glucuronide in blood and urine: applications to forensic toxicology
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 188
  start-page: 52
  year: 2009
  end-page: 56
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Blood kinetics of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
– volume: 276
  start-page: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0055
  article-title: THC and CBD in blood samples and seizures in Norway: does CBD affect THC-induced impairment in apprehended subjects?
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.006
– volume: 294
  start-page: 189
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0100
  article-title: Evaluating the hip-flask defence in subjects with alcohol on board: an experimental study
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.11.014
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1197
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0015
  article-title: Alcohol, psychoactive drugs and fatal road traffic accidents in Norway: a case-control study
  publication-title: Accid. Anal. Prev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.034
– volume: 188
  start-page: 52
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0075
  article-title: Blood kinetics of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.017
– volume: 48
  start-page: 74
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0080
  article-title: Measurement of ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulphate and their ratio in the urine and serum of healthy volunteers after two doses of alcohol
  publication-title: Alcohol Alcohol.
  doi: 10.1093/alcalc/ags108
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1116
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0095
  article-title: Computer-aided headspace gas chromatography applied to blood-alcohol analysis: importance of online process control
  publication-title: J. Forensic Sci.
  doi: 10.1520/JFS12748J
– volume: 26
  start-page: 333
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0090
  article-title: Reference limits for urine/blood ratios of ethanol in two successive voids from drinking drivers
  publication-title: J Anal. Toxicol.
  doi: 10.1093/jat/26.6.333
– volume: 27
  start-page: 89
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0030
  article-title: Driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs—an update part I: epidemiological studies
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Rev.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 1504
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0045
  article-title: Back calculation of alcohol: the "hip-flask defence"
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90995-6
– volume: 172
  start-page: 119
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0070
  article-title: A pharmacokinetic study of ethyl glucuronide in blood and urine: applications to forensic toxicology
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.005
– volume: 34
  start-page: 319
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0115
  article-title: Ethyl glucuronide concentrations in oral fluid, blood, and urine after volunteers drank 0.5 and 1.0 g/kg doses of ethanol
  publication-title: J. Anal. Toxicol.
  doi: 10.1093/jat/34.6.319
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0120
  article-title: Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications
  publication-title: Clin. Pharmacokinet.
  doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342010-00001
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1765
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0005
  article-title: Prevalence of alcohol and drugs among Norwegian motor vehicle drivers: a roadside survey
  publication-title: Accid. Anal. Prev.
  doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.015
– volume: 212
  start-page: 102
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0010
  article-title: Toxicological investigations of drivers killed in road traffic accidents in Norway during 2006-2008
  publication-title: Forensic Sci.Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.021
– volume: 31
  start-page: 229
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0050
  article-title: Top ten defence challenges among drinking drivers in Sweden
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Law
  doi: 10.1177/002580249103100307
– volume: 194
  start-page: 97
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0065
  article-title: Relationship between blood and urine alcohol concentrations in apprehended drivers who claimed consumption of alcohol after driving with and without supporting evidence
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.021
– volume: 240c
  start-page: 21
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0025
  article-title: Which drugs are associated with highest risk for being arrested for driving under the influence? A case-control study
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.027
– volume: 37
  start-page: 21
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0085
  article-title: Ethanol distribution ratios between urine and capillary blood in controlled experiments and in apprehended drinking drivers
  publication-title: J. Forensic Sci.
  doi: 10.1520/JFS13208J
– volume: 25
  start-page: 15
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0110
  article-title: Urine as a biological specimen for forensic analysis of alcohol and variability in the urine-to-blood relationship
  publication-title: Toxicol. Rev
  doi: 10.2165/00139709-200625010-00002
– year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0020
  article-title: Prevalence of alcohol, illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines in killed drivers in four European countries
  publication-title: Int. J. Inj. Contr. Saf. Promot.
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0105
  article-title: Quantitative determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem and antemortem whole blood using phospholipid removal 96-wells plates and UHPLC–MS/MS
  publication-title: J. Anal. Toxicol.
  doi: 10.1093/jat/bkaa108
– volume: 43
  start-page: 39
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0040
  article-title: Evaluating alleged drinking after driving—the hip-flask defence. Part 2. Congener analysis
  publication-title: Med. Sci. Law
  doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.1.39
– volume: 257
  start-page: 398
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0060
  article-title: Evaluation of the hip-flask defence by determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood
  publication-title: Forensic Sci. Int.
  doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.10.017
– volume: 42
  start-page: 207
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409_bib0035
  article-title: Evaluating alleged drinking after driving--the hip-flask defence. Part 1. Double blood samples and urine-to-blood alcohol relationship
  publication-title: Med Sci.Law.
  doi: 10.1177/002580240204200305
SSID ssj0005526
Score 2.311727
Snippet •Both ethanol concentrations in blood and urine and ethyl glucuronide/ethyl sulphate concentrations in blood can be used to objectively assess the hip-flask...
Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use of...
AimClaimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use...
Aim Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use...
Aim: Claimed intake of alcohol after a traffic incident, called the hip-flask defence, can be objectively assessed by different methods. One of them is the use...
SourceID swepub
cristin
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 110409
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Adult
Alcohol
Alcohol Drinking
Beer
Biomarkers - blood
Biomarkers - urine
Blood
Blood Alcohol Content
Body weight
Calibration
Central Nervous System Depressants - blood
Central Nervous System Depressants - pharmacokinetics
Central Nervous System Depressants - urine
Chromatography
Dosage
Drinking
Drinking behavior
Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence
Ethanol
Ethanol - blood
Ethanol - pharmacokinetics
Ethanol - urine
Ethyl glucuronide
Experiments
Female
Forensic sciences
Glucuronates - blood
Glucuronates - urine
Hip
Hip-flask defence
Humans
Ingestion
Legal defense
Male
Metabolites
Methods
Pharmacokinetics
Ratios
Software
Substance Abuse Detection - methods
sulfates
Sulfuric Acid Esters - blood
Sulfuric Acid Esters - urine
Time Factors
traffic
Urine
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3di9QwEA96Iggifl_1lAjiW3WT5qPxRRa94xD0yZN9C03arKtLu95uOe6_d6ZJe6h459uy6cBuZibzy_Q3M4S8NB6CctBwUwVzyIUWdQ4wQuac-8AbX87MDKuRP31Wxyfi40IuUsJtm2iV45k4HNR15zFH_oYLhXwCVcp3m585To3Ct6tphMZ1cmNoXQb2rBf6guIhufqN0wU4EALLqkUSJR8o8AKZiDf94FDtv2LT39jzj8aiQzA6ukvuJBRJ51Ht98i1pr1PbscUHI2VRQ9If5g6ebdLCjCPfltt8gBg-Qetm4AOTZH0vqQV9iUZUtoU-aIUK05ogyn1bg2LNX4-X1Mkt_fYSbduXtM59dMAQ9oFujvr6DBUZ_uQnBwdfnl_nKcpC7mXxuxy5ovaM14rp5x2RjjAEIwpuIgF-EI47pjUjgehvAwcR1ZpwGxB1NqXhQ-ueET22q5t9gl1tWJVYK4EAVEpX8nKOOndrApSKsMysp922rZg4NicVHJbMsF0RtS49dan7uQ4JGNtRxradztpz6L2bNReRmaT4CY26LhapBx1a8f6UzgxLQSRq0XfTqIJokTo8X_CB6Mh2XRSbO2FXWfkxbQMPo4vbqq26Xp8pjAKcDJjlzwDPicF4DGRkcfRSKf9KPBaLCRIv4pWO61gc_EPq69z250u7XrVW8CzRrEnl__Sp-QW_q1YknlA9nanffMMsNnOPR8c8BelYzls
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Evaluating the hip-flask defence using analytical data from ethanol and ethyl glucuronide. A comparison of two models
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0379073820302711
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110409
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32871451
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2462002685
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2439622611
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2561542414
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/81417
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-172961
Volume 316
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELdGJyQkhPhexpiMhHjLWjv-SHgro1MBUSFgqG9W7MQlrEqqrRHihb-du3yhgWBIvPQjzlWNfb772f7dHSFPEwdO2WtYqYI6hEKLLAQYIUPOnee5iyfJBKOR3y7U_FS8XsrlDjnuY2GQVtnZ_tamN9a6uzLuenO8KYrxh0mkYWUXgQvDszeM793lUaLkiOxOX72ZL34yPSRvjyw1xutE8SWaF0BD-PWiRF4lb1jxAsmJ110zx8o_uavf4egvuUYb_3Rym9zqgCWdtv_9DtnJy7vkZrsrR9tgo3uknnXJvcsVBeRHPxeb0AN-PqNZ7vHZKfLgVzTFVCXNLjdFCinFIBSa4y57tYbGDD9_W1Pku9eYXDfLj-iUuqGmIa083X6taFNn5-I-OT2ZfTyeh13hhdDJJNmGzEWZYzxTVlltE2EBVjCmYG3m4YKw3DKpLfdCOek5VrHSAOO8yLSLI-dt9ICMyqrM9wi1mWKpZzYGAZEql8o0sdLZSeqlVAkLyF7X06YEncd8pZKbmAmmA6L6rjeuS1iOdTPWpmemfTHD6BkcPdOOXkAmg-CmzdlxtUjcj63pQ1LBiBrwK1eLPh9EL2nuvwkf9IpkOuNxYbhQSJ1RsQzIk6EZpj2e5aRlXtV4D6g6QGfG_nIPTEMpAKKJgDxslXTojwhXykKC9LNWa4cWzDf-svg0NdX5yqyL2gDETRTb_5_HfERu4Lc2hvOAjLbndf4YwNzWHpJrR98ZvOqlPuwmLry_mC3evf8B-UtLBA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1tb9MwED6NTggkhHhfYYCRgG-B2rWdBAmhwjptbKsQ2qZ9M7ETl0KVlLXVtD_Fb-QubxMgNr7sWxXnosZ3vnvsPHcH8Dx2GJR9iDtVNIdAhjINEEaoQAjnReaiXtyjbOS9kd46kB-P1NEK_GxyYYhW2fjE0lGnhaMz8tdCauIT6Ei9m_0IqGsUfV1tWmhUZrGTnZ7glm3-dnsD9ftCiM3h_oetoO4qEDgVx4uAu37quEi11Ta0sbQYMznXuPHweEFaYbkKrfBSO-UFtWgKEaN4mYYu6jtv-_jcK7AqKaO1A6vvh6NPn89IJUro31hkiDwxlE1yom2KknQvift41ZVLOP9XNPwb7f5RyrQMf5u34GaNW9mgMrTbsJLld-BGdejHqlymu7Ac1rXD8zFDYMm-TmaBR3j-naWZJxfCiGY_ZglVQikP0RkxVBnluLCMDvGLKQ6m9Pt0yohOv6TavWn2ig2Ya1smssKzxUnByjY-83twcCkauA-dvMizNWA21Tzx3EYoIBPtEpXEVjnbS7xSOuZdWKtn2uS4pKgcqhIm4pKHXdDN1BtX10OnthxT0xDfvplWe4a0ZyrtdaHXCs6qkiAXi0SNbk2T8Yo-2mDYulj0TStag6IK7Pyf8HpjSKb2TXNztpK68KwdRq9Cn4qSPCuWdE8_1ojMOT_nHlzlSiIClF14UBlpOx992ohLhdIvK6ttR6ic-cbkcGCK47GZTpYGEXSs-cPz_-lTuLa1v7drdrdHO4_gOr1ilRC6Dp3F8TJ7jMhwYZ_Uy5HBl8v2AL8AwLl20Q
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbGEAgJIe4LDDAS8BZWO74kSAhVdNXGYOKBob6Z2IlLtyopa6Npf41fxzm5TYDYeNlbFedEjX0un53vnEPIi8RBUPYadqqgDqHQIgsBRsiQc-d57uJBMsBs5E_7audAfJjIyRr52eXCIK2y84m1o85Kh2fkW1wo5BOoWG75lhbxeTR-t_gRYgcp_NLatdNoVGQvPz2B7dvy7e4I1vol5-PtL-93wrbDQOhkkqxC5qLMMZ4pq6y2ibAQPxlTsAnxcEFYbpnUlnuhnPQc2zVpwCteZNrFkfM2gudeIVd1BKgKbElP9Bm9RHL1G58MMCgEtVmBBE5e0-8FsiCvudqYi3_Fxb9x7x9FTetAOL5NbrUIlg4blbtD1vLiLrnZHP_RJqvpHqm22yrixZQCxKTfZ4vQA1A_olnu0ZlQJNxPaYo1UerjdIpcVYrZLjTH4_xyDoMZ_j6dUyTWV1jFN8tf0yF1ffNEWnq6Oilp3dBneZ8cXMr8PyDrRVnkG4TaTLHUMxuDgEiVS2WaWOnsIPVSqoQFZKOdaVOAcWFhVMlNzATTAVHd1BvXVkbHBh1z01HgDk2_egZXzzSrF5BBL7hoioNcLBJ3a2u63Ffw1gYC2MWib3rRFh41sOf_hDc7RTKtl1qaM5sKyPN-GPwLfjRKi7ys8J4oUYDRGTvnHrB3KQALioA8bJS0n48It-RCgvSrRmv7ESxsPpp9HZryeGrms8oAlk4Ue3T-P31GroPdm4-7-3uPyQ18wyYzdJOsr46r_AlAxJV9WtsiJd8u2_h_AcOOeZg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating+the+hip-flask+defence+using+analytical+data+from+ethanol+and+ethyl+glucuronide.+A+comparison+of+two+models&rft.jtitle=Forensic+science+international&rft.au=H%C3%B6iseth%2C+G.&rft.au=Nilsson%2C+G.H.&rft.au=Lundberg%2C+R.&rft.au=Forsman%2C+M.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0379-0738&rft.volume=316&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.forsciint.2020.110409&rft.externalDocID=S0379073820302711
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0379-0738&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0379-0738&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0379-0738&client=summon