Both the scion and rootstock of grafted grapevines influence the rhizosphere and root endophyte microbiomes, but rootstocks have a greater impact
Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecul...
Saved in:
| Published in | Environmental microbiome Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 24 - 21 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
23.04.2024
BioMed Central BioMedCentral BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements.
The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots.
These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | BackgroundSoil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements.ResultsThe rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots.ConclusionThese results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Abstract Background Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements. Results The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots. Conclusion These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements. The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots. These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Background Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements. Results The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on [beta]-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the [beta]-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots. Conclusion These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Keywords: Bacteria, Fungi, Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Root system, Metabarcoding, PICRUSt2, FUNGuild Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements.BACKGROUNDSoil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements.The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots.RESULTSThe rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots.These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints.CONCLUSIONThese results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements. The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on [beta]-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the [beta]-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots. These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. Background: Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi, originated from soil, are also known to influence host health. In response to environmental stresses, the plant roots exude specific molecules influencing the composition and functioning of the rhizospheric and root microbiomes. This response is host genotype-dependent and is affected by the soil microbiological and chemical properties. It is essential to unravel the influence of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes on the composition of this microbiome, and to investigate this relationship with plant growth and adaptation to its environment. Here, the composition and the predicted functions of the microbiome of the root system were studied using metabarcoding on ten grapevine scion-rootstock combinations, in addition to plant growth and nutrition measurements.Results: The rootstock genotype significantly influenced the diversity and the structure of the bacterial and fungal microbiome, as well as its predicted functioning in rhizosphere and root compartments when grafted with the same scion cultivar. Based on β-diversity analyses, 1103P rootstock showed distinct bacterial and fungal communities compared to the five others (RGM, SO4, 41B, 3309 C and Nemadex). The influence of the scion genotype was more variable depending on the community and the investigated compartment. Its contribution was primarily observed on the β-diversity measured for bacteria and fungi in both root system compartments, as well as for the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the rhizosphere. Significant correlations were established between microbial variables and the plant phenotype, as well as with the plant mineral status measured in the petioles and the roots.Conclusion: These results shed light on the capacity of grapevine rootstock and scion genotypes to recruit different functional communities of microorganisms, which affect host growth and adaptation to the environment. Selecting rootstocks capable of associating with positive symbiotic microorganisms is an adaptation tool that can facilitate the move towards sustainable viticulture and help cope with environmental constraints. |
| ArticleNumber | 24 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Darriaut, Romain Lauvergeat, Virginie Lailheugue, Vincent Morel, Marine Marguerit, Elisa Tran, Joseph |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Vincent surname: Lailheugue fullname: Lailheugue, Vincent – sequence: 2 givenname: Romain surname: Darriaut fullname: Darriaut, Romain – sequence: 3 givenname: Joseph surname: Tran fullname: Tran, Joseph – sequence: 4 givenname: Marine surname: Morel fullname: Morel, Marine – sequence: 5 givenname: Elisa surname: Marguerit fullname: Marguerit, Elisa – sequence: 6 givenname: Virginie surname: Lauvergeat fullname: Lauvergeat, Virginie |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38654392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-04576763$$DView record in HAL |
| BookMark | eNp9ktFu0zAUhiM0xMbYC3CBInEDEh12HNvxFSoTsEmVuIFry3FOGpckDrZbabwFb8xpO7p1QigXjo-__7d9_D_PTkY_Qpa9pOSS0kq8jyWRis1IUc4I4ULM-JPsrOA4FUwWJw_-T7OLGFeEkIJRLjh_lp2ySvCSqeIs-_3Rpy5PHeTROj_mZmzy4H2KydsfuW_zZTBtgmY7TrBxI8TcjW2_htHCThc698vHqYMAB3UOY-On7jZBPjgbfO38APFdXq_TvXvMO7NBDVqDSRByN0zGphfZ09b0ES7uxvPs--dP366uZ4uvX26u5ouZ5apKM0mFJLziwhLLmTW1tIRRUZiCc24kNIWhzKpKcaDCylbUlDDFak5ta1qr2Hl2s_dtvFnpKbjBhFvtjdO7gg9LbUJytgeNO5m6UjVppCiNITVrq5rxWoDBYlmi14e917SuB2gsjCmY_sj0eGV0nV76jaaUlERVAh3e7h26R7rr-UJva6TkUkjBNhTZN3e7Bf9zDTHpwUULfW9G8OuoGbKUYjMIoq8foSu_DiP2VTOMkeK0VOqeWhq8LT6vx0ParameS0VLwqSskLr8B4VfA_jImM7WYf1I8OphVw7X-ps-BIo9gBGJMUB7QCjR25Trfco1plzvUq45iqpHIuuSSRhePI7r_yf9AwDRALM |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_025_07308_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture14101854 crossref_primary_10_1093_jxb_eraf006 crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10599 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scienta_2025_114023 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/jam.15160 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.2.4534 10.1093/femsec/fiaa053 10.1007/s10526-012-9479-6 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01142 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791 10.1111/1462-2920.16042 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1031064 10.7717/peerj.2584 10.1186/s40168-017-0391-2 10.1111/nph.15055 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x 10.3852/08-169 10.3390/microorganisms10050899 10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.008 10.1007/s12010-014-1131-8 10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0 10.1038/s41598-020-66067-w 10.3390/microorganisms9040822 10.3389/fpls.2023.1205451 10.1371/journal.pone.0132253 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.003 10.1093/bib/bbab318 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac438 10.56946/jspae.v1i2.56 10.1111/ppl.12117 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1188.28 10.1002/jsfa.5600 10.1007/s00253-013-5299-6 10.1038/s41598-020-75317-w 10.1038/nrmicro3109 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00568 10.1007/s00572-020-01014-1 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02240 10.1007/s13593-015-0329-7 10.1093/nar/gky1022 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107766 10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.09.001 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 10.3390/agronomy9090514 10.7717/peerj.593 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 10.1186/s12864-019-6358-x 10.1094/PBIOMES-03-21-0019-R 10.1016/B978-0-12-823414-3.00021-6 10.1093/jxb/ery206 10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.3.4626 10.3389/fmicb.2022.937940 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00090.x 10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113837 10.3390/app11041615 10.3390/microorganisms9010092 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.02.005 10.1093/hr/uhac019 10.1007/s00284-021-02537-2 10.1093/nar/gks1219 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104767 10.1007/s00374-020-01431-6 10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.5547 10.1186/s40793-023-00539-0 10.1007/s00572-020-00930-6 10.3390/agronomy11112359 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Attribution The Author(s) 2024 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Attribution – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40793-024-00566-5 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Databases Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Public Health Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 2524-6372 |
| EndPage | 21 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_670ab89b0d764aa0b3f8b35b6ea9b044 PMC11040986 oai_HAL_hal_04576763v1 A791403778 38654392 10_1186_s40793_024_00566_5 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | France |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 2XV 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC C6C CCPQU CITATION EBD EBLON EBS FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HMCUK IAO IHR ITC M7P M~E PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY ROL RPM RSV SOJ UKHRP NPM PQGLB PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FE 8FH 8FK AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. LK8 PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 1XC EJD VOOES 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c598t-716705856c0c53cab7c03162a2555a7ed2a13c9895e16c7f6b10393b51cfafc93 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISSN | 2524-6372 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:35 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:34:46 EDT 2025 Wed Jul 02 06:34:04 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:56:38 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:18:54 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:09:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:08:09 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:27:43 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:10 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Fungi Metabarcoding PICRUSt2 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Bacteria FUNGuild Root system |
| Language | English |
| License | 2024. The Author(s). Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c598t-716705856c0c53cab7c03162a2555a7ed2a13c9895e16c7f6b10393b51cfafc93 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5016-990X 0000-0003-2516-9200 0000-0002-4624-0363 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3118951499?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 38654392 |
| PQID | 3118951499 |
| PQPubID | 2040190 |
| PageCount | 21 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_670ab89b0d764aa0b3f8b35b6ea9b044 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11040986 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04576763v1 proquest_miscellaneous_3045113160 proquest_journals_3118951499 gale_infotracmisc_A791403778 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791403778 pubmed_primary_38654392 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40793_024_00566_5 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s40793_024_00566_5 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-04-23 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-23 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2024 text: 2024-04-23 day: 23 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Environmental microbiome |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Environ Microbiome |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BioMedCentral BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMedCentral – name: BMC |
| References | N Cochetel (566_CR57) 2018; 69 W Ma (566_CR17) 2022; 13 PJ McMurdie (566_CR45) 2013; 8 JF Swift (566_CR23) 2021; 9 F D’Amico (566_CR18) 2018; 9 N Massa (566_CR52) 2020; 10 F Jamil (566_CR14) 2022; 10 NH Nguyen (566_CR44) 2016; 20 GM Bucur (566_CR4) 2022; 66 566_CR67 566_CR63 RP Schreiner (566_CR59) 2009; 101 M Öpik (566_CR42) 2010; 188 566_CR60 C Berlanas (566_CR22) 2019; 10 JF Swift (566_CR27) 2023; 18 K Yoneyama (566_CR16) 2018; 218 E Cataldo (566_CR3) 2021; 11 J Pouzoulet (566_CR31) 2013; 97 Y Cao (566_CR46) 2022; 38 L Dries (566_CR5) 2021; 55 R Marasco (566_CR24) 2022; 24 K Suzuki (566_CR65) 2020; 56 V Lailheugue (566_CR58) 2023; 215 P Bettenfeld (566_CR8) 2022; 40 A Sabir (566_CR10) 2012; 92 F Mahé (566_CR39) 2014; 2 566_CR56 RC Edgar (566_CR38) 2011; 27 T Rognes (566_CR36) 2016; 4 JF Challacombe (566_CR51) 2019; 20 566_CR53 R Marasco (566_CR20) 2018; 6 M Bernard (566_CR35) 2021; 22 S Compant (566_CR12) 2013; 58 R Darriaut (566_CR49) 2022; 13 R Moukarzel (566_CR29) 2021; 131 R Darriaut (566_CR28) 2023; 183 L Philippot (566_CR15) 2013; 11 D Zuzolo (566_CR21) 2023; 14 R Rodriguez (566_CR54) 2020; 8 L Dries (566_CR62) 2023; 57 MV Salomon (566_CR11) 2014; 151 F Escudié (566_CR34) 2018; 34 GM Douglas (566_CR43) 2020; 38 566_CR48 MG Naitam (566_CR55) 2021; 78 566_CR9 R Darriaut (566_CR6) 2022; 9 SN Vink (566_CR26) 2021; 11 C Quast (566_CR40) 2012; 41 S Trouvelot (566_CR13) 2015; 35 AH Wright (566_CR25) 2022; 6 RH Nilsson (566_CR41) 2019; 47 BA Caldwell (566_CR69) 2005; 49 H Zhang (566_CR47) 2022; 1 C Van Leeuwen (566_CR2) 2019; 9 566_CR1 J-P Tandonnet (566_CR61) 2009; 16 R Kjøller (566_CR50) 2014; 9 A Gryta (566_CR68) 2014; 174 L Dries (566_CR19) 2021; 9 566_CR32 G Yu (566_CR64) 2015; 10 MA Hassani (566_CR7) 2018; 6 566_CR33 566_CR30 N Bodenhausen (566_CR66) 2021; 31 M Martin (566_CR37) 2011; 17 |
| References_xml | – volume: 131 start-page: 2941 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR29 publication-title: J Appl Microbiol doi: 10.1111/jam.15160 – ident: 566_CR33 – volume: 38 start-page: 685 year: 2020 ident: 566_CR43 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6 – volume: 17 start-page: 10 year: 2011 ident: 566_CR37 publication-title: EMBnet j doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 – volume: 55 start-page: 353 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR5 publication-title: OENO One doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.2.4534 – ident: 566_CR63 doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa053 – volume: 58 start-page: 435 year: 2013 ident: 566_CR12 publication-title: Biocontrol doi: 10.1007/s10526-012-9479-6 – volume: 10 start-page: 1142 year: 2019 ident: 566_CR22 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01142 – volume: 34 start-page: 1287 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR34 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791 – volume: 24 start-page: 3791 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR24 publication-title: Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16042 – volume: 13 start-page: 1031064 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR49 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1031064 – volume: 4 start-page: e2584 year: 2016 ident: 566_CR36 publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584 – volume: 6 start-page: 3 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR20 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0391-2 – volume: 218 start-page: 1522 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR16 publication-title: New Phytol doi: 10.1111/nph.15055 – volume: 188 start-page: 223 year: 2010 ident: 566_CR42 publication-title: New Phytol doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x – volume: 101 start-page: 599 year: 2009 ident: 566_CR59 publication-title: Mycologia doi: 10.3852/08-169 – volume: 10 start-page: 899 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR14 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050899 – volume: 40 start-page: 1 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR8 publication-title: J Adv Res doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.008 – volume: 174 start-page: 1434 year: 2014 ident: 566_CR68 publication-title: Appl Biochem Biotechnol doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-1131-8 – volume: 6 start-page: 58 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR7 publication-title: Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0 – ident: 566_CR30 – volume: 10 start-page: 9197 year: 2020 ident: 566_CR52 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66067-w – volume: 9 start-page: 822 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR19 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040822 – volume: 14 start-page: 1205451 year: 2023 ident: 566_CR21 publication-title: Front Plant Sci doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1205451 – volume: 10 start-page: e0132253 year: 2015 ident: 566_CR64 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132253 – volume: 49 start-page: 637 year: 2005 ident: 566_CR69 publication-title: Pedobiologia doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.003 – volume: 22 start-page: bbab318 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR35 publication-title: Brief Bioinform doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab318 – volume: 38 start-page: 4027 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR46 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac438 – ident: 566_CR9 – volume: 1 start-page: 16 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR47 publication-title: JSPAE doi: 10.56946/jspae.v1i2.56 – volume: 151 start-page: 359 year: 2014 ident: 566_CR11 publication-title: Physiol Plant doi: 10.1111/ppl.12117 – ident: 566_CR1 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1188.28 – volume: 92 start-page: 2148 year: 2012 ident: 566_CR10 publication-title: J Sci Food Agric doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5600 – volume: 97 start-page: 10163 year: 2013 ident: 566_CR31 publication-title: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5299-6 – ident: 566_CR56 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75317-w – volume: 11 start-page: 789 year: 2013 ident: 566_CR15 publication-title: Nat Rev Microbiol doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 – volume: 8 start-page: 568 year: 2020 ident: 566_CR54 publication-title: Front Bioeng Biotechnol doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00568 – volume: 31 start-page: 137 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR66 publication-title: Mycorrhiza doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-01014-1 – volume: 9 start-page: 2240 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR18 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02240 – volume: 35 start-page: 1449 year: 2015 ident: 566_CR13 publication-title: Agron Sustain Dev doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0329-7 – volume: 47 start-page: D259 year: 2019 ident: 566_CR41 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1022 – ident: 566_CR60 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107766 – ident: 566_CR67 doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.09.001 – volume: 27 start-page: 2194 year: 2011 ident: 566_CR38 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 – volume: 9 start-page: 514 year: 2019 ident: 566_CR2 publication-title: Agronomy doi: 10.3390/agronomy9090514 – volume: 2 start-page: e593 year: 2014 ident: 566_CR39 publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.593 – volume: 8 start-page: e61217 year: 2013 ident: 566_CR45 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 – volume: 20 start-page: 976 year: 2019 ident: 566_CR51 publication-title: BMC Genomics doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6358-x – volume: 6 start-page: 69 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR25 publication-title: Phytobiomes J doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-03-21-0019-R – ident: 566_CR48 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823414-3.00021-6 – volume: 69 start-page: 4099 year: 2018 ident: 566_CR57 publication-title: J Exp Bot doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery206 – ident: 566_CR32 doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.3.4626 – volume: 13 start-page: 937940 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR17 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.937940 – volume: 16 start-page: 290 year: 2009 ident: 566_CR61 publication-title: Aust J Grape Wine Res doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00090.x – volume: 215 start-page: 113837 year: 2023 ident: 566_CR58 publication-title: Phytochemistry doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113837 – volume: 11 start-page: 1615 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR26 publication-title: Appl Sci doi: 10.3390/app11041615 – volume: 9 start-page: 92 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR23 publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010092 – volume: 9 start-page: 43 year: 2014 ident: 566_CR50 publication-title: Fungal Ecol doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.02.005 – volume: 9 start-page: uhac019 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR6 publication-title: Hortic Res doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac019 – volume: 78 start-page: 2510 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR55 publication-title: Curr Microbiol doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02537-2 – volume: 66 start-page: 177 year: 2022 ident: 566_CR4 publication-title: Sci Papers Ser B Hortic – volume: 41 start-page: D590 year: 2012 ident: 566_CR40 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 – volume: 183 start-page: 104767 year: 2023 ident: 566_CR28 publication-title: Appl Soil Ecol doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104767 – volume: 56 start-page: 853 year: 2020 ident: 566_CR65 publication-title: Biol Fertil Soils doi: 10.1007/s00374-020-01431-6 – volume: 57 start-page: 86 year: 2023 ident: 566_CR62 publication-title: OENO One doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.5547 – volume: 18 start-page: 84 year: 2023 ident: 566_CR27 publication-title: Environ Microbiome doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00539-0 – ident: 566_CR53 doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-00930-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 2359 year: 2021 ident: 566_CR3 publication-title: Agronomy doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112359 – volume: 20 start-page: 241 year: 2016 ident: 566_CR44 publication-title: Fungal Ecol doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 |
| SSID | ssj0002315655 |
| Score | 2.3175912 |
| Snippet | Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria and fungi,... Background Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria... BackgroundSoil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated bacteria... Background: Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated... Abstract Background Soil microorganisms play an extensive role in the biogeochemical cycles providing the nutrients necessary for plant growth. Root-associated... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 24 |
| SubjectTerms | Adaptation Analysis Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Arbuscular mycorrhizas Bacteria Biodiversity and Ecology Biogeochemical cycles Biological diversity Chemical properties Cultivars Diseases and pests Drought Endophytes Environmental Sciences Environmental stress Fungi Genetic aspects Genotype & phenotype Genotypes Grapes Growth Host plants Influence Metabarcoding Microbiomes Microbiota Microorganisms Nutrient cycles Phenotypes PICRUSt2 Plant growth Plant nutrition Protection and preservation Rhizosphere Rhizosphere microorganisms Root system Roots Rootstocks Soil microbiology Soil microorganisms Viticulture Wineries & vineyards |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagJySEeBNakEFIHMBqEsePHLeIaoUQJyr1ZtmOwy6lSbXJ9n_wjzvjZMMGJLhwWsmvdTJjzze7M98Q8gachorzqmCl1JYVtQ0McTLDjK9KVAErC2C0xRe5PCs-nYvzvVJfGBM20AMPL-5YqtQ6Xbq0UrKwNnW81o4LJ4OFxiIygYLN23OmvkcSF_BLhNhlyWh53BVIBcfAJDGkv5RMzCxRJOyfruXbK4yK_BNy_h45uWeKTu-TeyOGpIth7w_IrdA8JHeHH-DokFf0iPw8ARlQgHcUjFzbUNtUFFByD2DPX9C2pt82WB-8ws8rsI5w5dH1rmJJnLfBcLwOaQfCNJuGpmpBMn2gl-uBw-kydO-p2_a_Vu_oyl7DHFgabvqwoUMq5mNydvrx64clG-svMC9K3TNwpVQK7oT0qRfcW6c8SE7mFtwQYVWocptxX-pShEx6VUuH_ytzJzJf29qX_Ak5aNomPCMUUFbmdepSbnWR15njwSnneAntiOgSku1kYfxITo41Mn6Y6KRoaQb5GZCfifIzIiHvpjlXAzXHX0efoIinkUirHRtA2cyobOZfypaQt6ggBg8_bM_bMYcBHhJptMxClch_qJROyNFsJBxaP-t-DSo228xy8dlgG2BsJeHWv85gjZ0GmvFm6QyH5wNUDI5qQl5N3bg8Rss1od3CGCQNykBUaUKeDgo7fRXWeAUQmidEz1R5tpd5T7NeRd5xQIpFWmr5_H-8ykNyJ4-HsWA5PyIH_WYbXgC-693LeJRvACE9TA4 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Title | Both the scion and rootstock of grafted grapevines influence the rhizosphere and root endophyte microbiomes, but rootstocks have a greater impact |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38654392 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3118951499 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3045113160 https://hal.science/hal-04576763 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11040986 https://doaj.org/article/670ab89b0d764aa0b3f8b35b6ea9b044 |
| Volume | 19 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1di9QwFA3u7osg4rfVdYgi-KBh26ZN0ieZkV0GkUXEhXkLSZruDLrt2Hb2f_iPvbftdK3CPg2kSSblJDcntzfnEvIWDg0553nCMqEMSwrjGfJkhje-8jT3mFkAoy3OxfIi-bxKV4PDrRnCKvc2sTPUeeXQR37CgQkDGwCC_nH7i2HWKPy6OqTQOCBHKF2GIV1yJUcfC3AX4Cvp_q6MEidNgoJwDDYmhiKYgqWT_aiT7R-N88EaYyP_J57_xk_-tSGdPSD3ByZJ5z30D8kdXz4i93o3HO1vFz0mvxeABAWSR2Grq0pqypwCV26B8rkftCroZY1ZwnP83cIeCYaPbvZ5S7p2NQblNSg-4MfW1Jd5Bfi0nl5teiWnK998oHbX3vTe0LW5hjbQNdh7X9P-QuYTcnF2-v3Tkg1ZGJhLM9UyOFDJEA4VwoUu5c5Y6QA_ERs4jKRG-jw2EXcZgOMj4WQhLH5d5jaNXGEKl_Gn5LCsSv-cUOBakVOhDblRSVxElnsrreUZlCOvC0i0x0K7QaIcM2X81N1RRQnd46cBP93hp9OAvB_bbHuBjltrLxDisSaKa3cFVX2ph7Wq4X2NVZkNcykSY0LLC2V5aoU3UJgkAXmHE0SjCYDhOTPcZICXRDEtPZcZqiBKqQJyPKkJS9dNHr-BKTYZzHL-RWMZMG0pwPZfR9DHfgbqwb40-mY1BOT1-Bi7x5i50lc7qIPSQRFAFQbkWT9hx7_CTK9AReOAqMlUnoxl-qTcrDv1ceCLSZgp8eL2cb0kd-NumSUs5sfksK13_hXwt9bOukU6I0eL0_Ov32adF2TWudn-AIXbRtw |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbK9gASQrwJFDAIxIFaTeLESQ4I7UKrLV1WCLVSb8Z2nO4Kmiy72SJ-Bn-E38hMXiUg9dZTJL_iaMYznx3PN4S8gE1DynkasETEigWZsgxxMsOIrzRMLWYWwNsWUzE-Cj4ch8cb5HcbC4PXKlubWBnqtDB4Rr7DAQkDGgCA_nbxnWHWKPy72qbQqNXiwP78AVu21Zv99yDfl76_t3v4bsyarALMhElcMtggRC6AZGFcE3KjdGRgPsJXAK5DFdnUVx43CbzMesJEmdD4t5Tr0DOZygySL4HJ3ww4bGUGZHO0O_30uTvVAbQECClso3NisbMKkIKOgStkSLspWNjzgFWigM4dXJnhbcz_oe6_Nzb_coF7N8mNBrvSYa1st8iGzW-T6_XBH63jme6QXyOQPQVYScG5FjlVeUoBnZcAMs1XWmT0ZIl5yVN8LsArg6ml8zZTStVvidcAV0h3YLve1OZpARpRWno6r7mjTu1qm-p1eT76is7UGfSBocHD2CWtQ0DvkqNLkdA9MsiL3D4gFNCdZ2JXu1zFgZ95mlsdac0TKEck6RCvlYU0DSk65ub4JqvNUSxkLT8J8pOV_GTokNddn0VNCXJh6xGKuGuJdN5VQbE8kY11kPC9SseJdtNIBEq5mmex5qEWVkFhEDjkFSqIRKMD0zOqiZ2Aj0T6LjmMEuRdjKLYIVu9lmAsTK_6OahYbzLj4URiGWD7SIC3OfNgjFYDZWPRVvJ8_TnkWVeNw-MtvdwWa2iDZEUeiMp1yP1aYbtXYW5ZAL--Q-KeKvfm0q_J57OK7xwQauAmsXh48byekqvjw48TOdmfHjwi1_xqyQXM51tkUC7X9jGgx1I_aZYsJV8u20r8AeeUgII |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Both+the+scion+and+rootstock+of+grafted+grapevines+influence+the+rhizosphere+and+root+endophyte+microbiomes%2C+but+rootstocks+have+a+greater+impact&rft.jtitle=Environmental+microbiome&rft.au=Lailheugue%2C+Vincent&rft.au=Darriaut%2C+Romain&rft.au=Tran%2C+Joseph&rft.au=Morel%2C+Marine&rft.date=2024-04-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=2524-6372&rft.volume=19&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40793-024-00566-5 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2524-6372&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2524-6372&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2524-6372&client=summon |