Analysis of gastric microbiome reveals three distinctive microbial communities associated with the occurrence of gastric cancer

Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC microbiology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 184 - 13
Main Authors Liu, Dehua, Zhang, Rutong, Chen, Si, Sun, Baolin, Zhang, Kaiguang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 23.07.2022
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
AbstractList Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets.BACKGROUNDGastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets.We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis.METHODSWe conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis.We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria.RESULTSWe identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria.This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.CONCLUSIONSThis study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Keywords: Microbiota, Bacterial community, Gastric cancer, Predictive model
Abstract Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.
ArticleNumber 184
Audience Academic
Author Chen, Si
Liu, Dehua
Sun, Baolin
Zhang, Kaiguang
Zhang, Rutong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dehua
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Dehua
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rutong
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Rutong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Si
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Si
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Baolin
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Baolin
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kaiguang
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Kaiguang
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ktuL1DAUxousuBf9B3yQgi_60DWXtklehGHxMrAgeHkOp-npTJa2WZN0dJ781013dnRmEQkl4fT3fWnP-c6zk9GNmGXPKbmkVNZvAmWyrgvCWHoqVRbbR9kZLQUtGJXk5OB8mp2HcEMIFZKLJ9kpr6QgitCz7NdihH4bbMhdl68gRG9NPljjXWPdgLnHDUIf8rj2iHlrQ7SjiXaDewj63LhhmEYbLYYcQnDGQsQ2_2HjOukwd8ZM3uNo8PASA6ngn2aPu-SPz-73i-zb-3dfrz4W158-LK8W14WplIiFYdgo1aIkvIIGOm6gayjKznRIBG9EWylJRaUqKsqKlw0Y1oKgaBSRrFT8IlvufFsHN_rW2wH8Vjuw-q7g_EqDj9b0qBm0lZD1vFgJtQJBULZpE6ozhJbJ6-3O63ZqBmwNjtFDf2R6_Ga0a71yG614-hheJYNX9wbefZ8wRD3YYLDvYUQ3Bc1qxYVgNRMJffkAvXGTTzNLlCB8nmfN_1IrSD9gx86le81sqheCpphQQmbq8h9UWi2mYaZsdTbVjwSvjwSJifgzrmAKQS-_fD5mXxw25U839lFLgNwBKTYheOy0sRGidXOPbK8p0XOq9S7VOqVa36Vab5OUPZDu3f8j-g060Pqv
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202401695
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2024_1397466
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e41715
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_024_05702_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13099_024_00619_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15224738
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1112709
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2023_115117
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpmfor_2024_10_001
crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2023_490
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40199_023_00480_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16203547
crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v15_i2_276
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_microb_2023_100009
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17020226
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trecan_2025_01_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmogo_2024_100048
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2024_332815
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines13010100
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25136818
crossref_primary_10_1111_1751_7915_70115
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopha_2024_116912
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i35_3972
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13010081
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_024_03219_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241813786
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15102668
Cites_doi 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8
10.1016/j.tranon.2019.03.003
10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.034
10.1038/s43588-022-00247-8
10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6
10.1038/s41598-017-16289-2
10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314281
10.3389/fmicb.2019.01261
10.1109/IV.2013.39
10.1038/nature09944
10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0
10.3389/fimmu.2020.01387
10.1038/srep18594
10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.010
10.1111/hel.12547
10.1080/19490976.2020.1762520
10.3389/fmicb.2020.00997
10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319826
10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
10.3390/ijms21249735
10.3390/microorganisms7010020
10.1371/journal.ppat.1004266
10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035
10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.009
10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951
10.1111/imm.12760
10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317556
10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324489
10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595
10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205
10.3389/fcimb.2018.00202
10.3389/fcimb.2021.749207
10.1038/s41467-019-12669-6
10.3389/fcimb.2017.00302
10.3390/cancers11040504
10.1128/Iai.70.5.2630-2639.2002
10.3322/caac.21660
10.1038/s41564-019-0541-3
10.1111/hel.12145
10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7QL
7T7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12866-022-02594-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database

MEDLINE - Academic



MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
Ecology
EISSN 1471-2180
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014
PMC9308235
A711281003
35870901
10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK5
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
MM.
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~02
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PMFND
3V.
7QL
7T7
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
M7N
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-c2eb99de8035abaf3cafb1e8fcfe073b7d59817595174534bac2da71ec9082493
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2180
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:23:41 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:02:11 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:00:33 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:52:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:18:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:42:40 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:02:55 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:31:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:01 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Microbiota
Gastric cancer
Bacterial community
Predictive model
Language English
License 2022. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c597t-c2eb99de8035abaf3cafb1e8fcfe073b7d59817595174534bac2da71ec9082493
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12866-022-02594-y
PMID 35870901
PQID 2703783763
PQPubID 42585
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9308235
proquest_miscellaneous_2693772627
proquest_journals_2703783763
gale_infotracmisc_A711281003
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A711281003
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A711281003
pubmed_primary_35870901
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-07-23
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-07-23
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-07-23
  day: 23
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC microbiology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Microbiol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References Q Cai (2594_CR2) 2019; 68
G Kadeerhan (2594_CR8) 2021; 11
JM Larsen (2594_CR32) 2017; 151
2594_CR39
2594_CR12
JL Espinoza (2594_CR40) 2018; 414
B Flemer (2594_CR42) 2017; 66
2594_CR14
2594_CR13
G Yu (2594_CR18) 2017; 7
N Sugimura (2594_CR43) 2021
H Sung (2594_CR1) 2021; 71
Z Zhai (2594_CR36) 2018; 48
OA Stewart (2594_CR3) 2020; 11
Z Wang (2594_CR7) 2020; 11
JA Tsatsaronis (2594_CR31) 2014; 10
X Long (2594_CR30) 2019; 4
G Ravegnini (2594_CR21) 2020; 21
CH Park (2594_CR10) 2019; 24
MA Adamu (2594_CR41) 2010; 25
E Bolyen (2594_CR22) 2019; 37
M Arumugam (2594_CR26) 2011; 473
CA Brennan (2594_CR29) 2019; 17
C Peng (2594_CR35) 2020; 11
N Castano-Rodriguez (2594_CR5) 2017; 7
BD Kaehler (2594_CR23) 2019; 10
B Armistead (2594_CR34) 2019; 431
2594_CR27
Y Zavros (2594_CR37) 2002; 70
2594_CR28
XH Chen (2594_CR20) 2019; 10
PI Costea (2594_CR15) 2018; 3
RM Ferreira (2594_CR4) 2018; 67
X Liu (2594_CR19) 2019; 40
JJY Sung (2594_CR11) 2020; 69
OO Coker (2594_CR6) 2018; 67
I Yang (2594_CR16) 2016; 6
MI Love (2594_CR24) 2014; 15
L Xiao (2594_CR25) 2022
D Liu (2594_CR9) 2021; 11
J Wu (2594_CR33) 2019; 12
SK Kwon (2594_CR38) 2021
CS Eun (2594_CR17) 2014; 19
References_xml – volume: 3
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 2594_CR15
  publication-title: Nat Microbiol
  doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8
– volume: 12
  start-page: 846
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR33
  publication-title: Transl Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.03.003
– volume: 40
  start-page: 336
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR19
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.034
– year: 2022
  ident: 2594_CR25
  publication-title: Nature Computational Science
  doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00247-8
– volume: 17
  start-page: 156
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR29
  publication-title: Nat Rev Microbiol
  doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6
– volume: 11
  start-page: 561
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 2594_CR8
  publication-title: China Am J Cancer Res
– volume: 7
  start-page: 15957
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 2594_CR5
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16289-2
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1024
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 2594_CR6
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314281
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1261
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR20
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01261
– ident: 2594_CR27
  doi: 10.1109/IV.2013.39
– volume: 473
  start-page: 174
  issue: 7346
  year: 2011
  ident: 2594_CR26
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/nature09944
– volume: 25
  start-page: 439
  issue: 7
  year: 2010
  ident: 2594_CR41
  publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1387
  year: 2020
  ident: 2594_CR35
  publication-title: Front Immunol
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01387
– volume: 6
  start-page: 18594
  year: 2016
  ident: 2594_CR16
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/srep18594
– volume: 48
  start-page: 897
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 2594_CR36
  publication-title: Immunity
  doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.010
– volume: 24
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR10
  publication-title: Helicobacter
  doi: 10.1111/hel.12547
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1220
  issue: 5
  year: 2020
  ident: 2594_CR3
  publication-title: Gut Microbes
  doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1762520
– volume: 11
  start-page: 997
  year: 2020
  ident: 2594_CR7
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00997
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1572
  issue: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: 2594_CR11
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319826
– ident: 2594_CR14
– volume: 37
  start-page: 852
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR22
  publication-title: Nat Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
– volume: 21
  start-page: 9735
  issue: 24
  year: 2020
  ident: 2594_CR21
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms21249735
– ident: 2594_CR39
  doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8
– ident: 2594_CR28
  doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010020
– volume: 10
  issue: 8
  year: 2014
  ident: 2594_CR31
  publication-title: PLoS Pathog
  doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004266
– volume: 431
  start-page: 2914
  issue: 16
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR34
  publication-title: J Mol Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035
– volume: 414
  start-page: 147
  year: 2018
  ident: 2594_CR40
  publication-title: Cancer Lett
  doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.009
– year: 2021
  ident: 2594_CR43
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951
– volume: 151
  start-page: 363
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 2594_CR32
  publication-title: Immunology
  doi: 10.1111/imm.12760
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1576
  issue: 9
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR2
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317556
– year: 2021
  ident: 2594_CR38
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324489
– volume: 66
  start-page: 633
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 2594_CR42
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595
– volume: 67
  start-page: 226
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 2594_CR4
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205
– ident: 2594_CR13
  doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00202
– volume: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: 2594_CR9
  publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.749207
– volume: 10
  start-page: 4643
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR23
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12669-6
– volume: 7
  start-page: 302
  year: 2017
  ident: 2594_CR18
  publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00302
– ident: 2594_CR12
  doi: 10.3390/cancers11040504
– volume: 70
  start-page: 2630
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 2594_CR37
  publication-title: Infect Immun
  doi: 10.1128/Iai.70.5.2630-2639.2002
– volume: 71
  start-page: 209
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  ident: 2594_CR1
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
– volume: 4
  start-page: 2319
  issue: 12
  year: 2019
  ident: 2594_CR30
  publication-title: Nat Microbiol
  doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0541-3
– volume: 19
  start-page: 407
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 2594_CR17
  publication-title: Helicobacter
  doi: 10.1111/hel.12145
– volume: 15
  start-page: 550
  issue: 12
  year: 2014
  ident: 2594_CR24
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
SSID ssj0017837
Score 2.470786
Snippet Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition...
Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and...
Abstract Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity,...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 184
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Analysis
Bacteria
Bacteria - genetics
Bacterial community
Biopsy
Cancer
Carcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis - pathology
Carcinogens
Care and treatment
Cluster analysis
Composition
Data processing
Datasets
Diagnosis
Dysbacteriosis
Ecology
Gastric cancer
Gastric Mucosa - microbiology
Gastritis
Gastritis - complications
Gastritis - microbiology
Gastritis - pathology
Gastritis, Atrophic - complications
Gastritis, Atrophic - pathology
Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics
Health aspects
Helicobacter Infections - microbiology
Helicobacter pylori - genetics
Humans
Metaplasia
Microbial activity
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)
Microorganisms
Predictive model
Risk factors
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
rRNA 16S
Stomach cancer
Stomach Neoplasms
Taxonomy
Tumors
Variance analysis
Vegan
Veganism
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxRBEG4kIHgRNT7GRGlF8CBDdnqmX8cohijoQQ3k1vQzBsxMyO4e9uRft6qnZ9lB0EsOy8J29e5O1dfV1TNVXxHyhuPNhBCaWgWe6k5aVSsbQ70Qrk2xUzxprB3-8lWcnnWfz_n5TqsvzAkb6YFHxR0xGwBUQuVKBiu0lYuoArxJnfwit7BmsOdNh6ny_EDCuWsqkVHiaAleWGCyLYMX1129mW1Dma3_b5-8synNEyZ3dqCTB-R-CR3p8fiXH5I7sX9E7o7NJDf75PfEL0KHRC8s9uPw9OpyJFq6ihS5mgBrdAXWizTg2u6zs5uE4Lv9WC6CJKvUFsPFQPFmLcyLdPA-8zn5uPsjHpFz85icnXz88eG0Lu0Vag-niFXtWXRah6gWLbfOptbb5Jqokk8RFr6TgWsF0YVGMmveds56Fqxsosc26Z1un5C9fujjM0Ktdg0TtnNgmq5D0jeBsaJkyTsWk6pIM2nb-MI9ji0wfpl8BlHCjBYyYCGTLWQ2FXm3nXM9Mm_8U_o9GnEriazZ-QPAkilYMv_DUkVeIwQM8mL0mHhzYdfLpfn0_Zs5lg0-cwQfWJG3RSgNcA3eljoG0ARSac0kD2eSsHD9fHhCmimOY2kYeGAEr4DhV9thnInJcH0c1iAjIKaUTDBZkacjMLfX3XJwwBDjVUTOIDtTzHykv_yZacV1Zi7iz29DkwfkHsurTdasPSR7q5t1fAHR28q9zAv1D1keQmM
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96Ivgifls9JYrgg5Tbpm0-nuSUO05BH9SDfQtpPtYDrz23uw_75L_uTJrWLcI9LLtsJrTNzPwySTO_IeRNjZsJzhW5dHXIK2FkLo13-YI3ZfCVrIPC3OEvX_nZefV5WS_ThlufjlWOmBiB2nUW98iPGJimkOgO769-51g1Ct-uphIaN8ktpC5DqxbLacFVoPyYKCP5UQ9YzPHILYNPrap8N5uMImf__8i8NzXNj03uzUOn98jdFEDS40Hj98kN3z4gt4eSkjv4dRJpqHcPyZ-Rb4R2ga4M1uew9PJiIF669BS5m8D26Aa06alDX28j-I1CcBU7pI8g6So1SZHeUdy8hX6edtZGfifr9y9i0ZLWj8j56cmPj2d5KreQW1hVbHLLfKOU83JR1qYxobQmNIWXwQYPQNAIVysJ0YZCcuu6rBpjmTOi8BbLpleqfEwO2q71Twk1qikYN1XjpasqJIHjGDsKFmzDfJAZKcZx1zZxkWNJjF86rkkk14OuNOhKR13pXUbeTX2uBiaOa6U_oDonSWTRjn9065VOTqmZcQBYXMYsGcOVEQu4YfgSKlhYO2bkNRqDRp6MFg_irMy27_Wn79_0sSjwHSRgYkbeJqHQwTNYk_IaYCSQWmsmeTiTBEe28-bR5nQCkl7_M_uMvJqasScejmt9twUZDjGmYJyJjDwZTHR67rIGQIaYLyNiZryzgZm3tBc_I824ikxG9bPrb-s5ucOiR4mclYfkYLPe-hcQp22al9EZ_wLzqz2x
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Analysis of gastric microbiome reveals three distinctive microbial communities associated with the occurrence of gastric cancer
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870901
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2703783763
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2693772627
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9308235
https://doaj.org/article/2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9NAFB72grIv4t3oWqIIPki0mSRzeRDZyi6rsItUC8WXYTKXurCbaC9gn_zrnjNJaoOLDz60hc6ZtDm3OWcy5zuEvChwM8HaNBG28EnOtUiEdjYZsjLzLheFl1g7fHbOTif5x2kx3SFdu6OWgYtrUzvsJzWZX77--WP9Dgz-bTB4wd4swMcyPEpL4VXIPFnvkn1YmTh2NDjL_zxV4JCNdYUz1847IDezAjRYtj1iunUqwPn_7bS3Vq3-icqtJerkNrnVxpbxUaMMd8iOq-6SG023yfU98qsDIIlrH880Nuww8dVFg8R05WIEcwKmxEsQr4stGn8VvGFHBNc2TT0JorDGupWsszHu5sI8F9fGBMAn47Z_xKBqze-Tycnxl_enSdt_ITGQZiwTQ10ppXVimBW61D4z2pepE954B56h5LaQAsIPiWjXRZaX2lCreeoM9lHPZfaA7FV15R6RWMsypUznpRM2zxEVjmEwyak3JXVeRCTtuK1MC06OPTIuVUhSBFONsBQISwVhqXVEXm3mfG-gOf5JPUIhbigRVjt8Uc9nqrVSRbUFD8ZEKJvRTGo-hD8MH1x6A8lkRJ6jCigEzqjwZM5MrxYL9eHzWB3xFB9KgpOMyMuWyNdwD0a3hQ7ACcTa6lEe9ijBsk1_uNM01RmGouCiUY8ZDD_bDONMPC1XuXoFNAyCTk4Z5RF52Cjm5r47_Y4I76lsjzH9keriW8AdlwHaqHj83zOfkAMarI0nNDske8v5yj2FmG5ZDsgun_IB2R8dn38aD8LOyCAYL7yPR19_A26bUAU
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgQXxJuUAgaBOKCoGyexnQNCBVrt0scBWmlvxvFjqdQmZR9Ce-If8RuZcZJlI6Teeljtaj1RHM_4m7Hj-YaQ1zluJlibxNLmPs6ElrHUzsYDXqbeZTL3BeYOHx3z4Wn2ZZyPN8ifLhcGj1V2mBiA2tYG98h3GJimkDgdPlz-jLFqFL5d7UpoNGZx4Ja_YMk2ez_6DPp9w9j-3smnYdxWFYgNBM_z2DBXFoV1cpDmutQ-NdqXiZPeeAf2XgqbFxKcaoEcznmaldowq0XiDFYHz5B8CSD_BjjeAS72xHi1wEuwf11ijuQ7M8B-jkd8GXzyIouXPecXagT87wnWXGH_mOaa39u_S-60ASvdbSzsHtlw1X1ysylhuYRfe4H2evmA_O74TWjt6URjPRBDL84aoqcLR5ErCmydzsF6HLWILVUA204I7mKadBUkeaW6NRxnKW4Ww3WO1sYEPinj1m9i0HKnD8nptSjiEdms6so9IVQXZcK4zkonbZYh6RzHWFUwb0rmvIxI0o27Mi33OZbgOFdhDSS5anSlQFcq6EotI_Judc1lw_xxpfRHVOdKElm7wx_1dKJaEFBMWwBILkNWjuaFFgPoMHyJwhtYq0bkFRqDQl6OCg_-TPRiNlOjb1_VrkjwnSdgcETetkK-hmcwus2jgJFAKq-e5HZPEoDD9Js7m1MtcM3Uv2kWkZerZrwSD-NVrl6ADIeYVjDOREQeNya6eu40BwcAMWZERM94ewPTb6nOfgRa8yIwJ-VbV3frBbk1PDk6VIej44On5DYLs0vELN0mm_Ppwj2DGHFePg8Tk5Lv140EfwHFBnuW
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+gastric+microbiome+reveals+three+distinctive+microbial+communities+associated+with+the+occurrence+of+gastric+cancer&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Liu%2C+Dehua&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Rutong&rft.au=Chen%2C+Si&rft.au=Sun%2C+Baolin&rft.date=2022-07-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=22&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12866-022-02594-y&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35870901&rft.externalDocID=PMC9308235
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon