Analysis of gastric microbiome reveals three distinctive microbial communities associated with the occurrence of gastric cancer
Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC microbiology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 184 - 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
23.07.2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets.
We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis.
We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria.
This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets.BACKGROUNDGastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets.We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis.METHODSWe conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis.We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria.RESULTSWe identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria.This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis.CONCLUSIONSThis study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Keywords: Microbiota, Bacterial community, Gastric cancer, Predictive model Abstract Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. Methods We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. Results We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. Conclusions This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition patterns of gastric bacteria in stages of gastric carcinogenesis based on the published datasets. We conducted a gastric microbial analysis using 10 public datasets based on 16S rRNA sequencing, including 1270 gastric biopsies of 109 health control, 183 superficial gastritis (SG), 135 atrophic gastritis (AG), 124 intestinal metaplasia (IM), 94 intraepithelial neoplasia (IN), 344 GC, and 281 adjacent normal tissues. And QIIME2-pipeline, DESeq2, NetMoss2, vegan, igraph, and RandomForest were used for the data processing and analysis. We identified three gastric microbial communities among all the gastric tissues. The first community (designate as GT-H) was featured by the high abundance of Helicobacter. The other two microbial communities, namely GT-F, and GT-P, were featured by the enrichment of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively. The distribution of GC-associated bacteria, such as Fusobacterium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella were enriched in tumor tissues, and mainly distributed in GT-F type microbial communities. Compared with SG, AG, and IM, the bacterial diversity in GC was significantly reduced. And the strength of microbial interaction networks was initially increased in IM but gradually decreased from IN to GC. In addition, Randomforest models constructed in in GT-H and GT-F microbial communities showed excellent performance in distinguishing GC from SG and precancerous stages, with varied donated bacteria. This study identified three types of gastric microbiome with different patterns of composition which helps to clarify the potential key bacteria in the development of gastric carcinogenesis. |
ArticleNumber | 184 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Chen, Si Liu, Dehua Sun, Baolin Zhang, Kaiguang Zhang, Rutong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dehua surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Dehua – sequence: 2 givenname: Rutong surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Rutong – sequence: 3 givenname: Si surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Si – sequence: 4 givenname: Baolin surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Baolin – sequence: 5 givenname: Kaiguang surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Kaiguang |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ktuL1DAUxousuBf9B3yQgi_60DWXtklehGHxMrAgeHkOp-npTJa2WZN0dJ781013dnRmEQkl4fT3fWnP-c6zk9GNmGXPKbmkVNZvAmWyrgvCWHoqVRbbR9kZLQUtGJXk5OB8mp2HcEMIFZKLJ9kpr6QgitCz7NdihH4bbMhdl68gRG9NPljjXWPdgLnHDUIf8rj2iHlrQ7SjiXaDewj63LhhmEYbLYYcQnDGQsQ2_2HjOukwd8ZM3uNo8PASA6ngn2aPu-SPz-73i-zb-3dfrz4W158-LK8W14WplIiFYdgo1aIkvIIGOm6gayjKznRIBG9EWylJRaUqKsqKlw0Y1oKgaBSRrFT8IlvufFsHN_rW2wH8Vjuw-q7g_EqDj9b0qBm0lZD1vFgJtQJBULZpE6ozhJbJ6-3O63ZqBmwNjtFDf2R6_Ga0a71yG614-hheJYNX9wbefZ8wRD3YYLDvYUQ3Bc1qxYVgNRMJffkAvXGTTzNLlCB8nmfN_1IrSD9gx86le81sqheCpphQQmbq8h9UWi2mYaZsdTbVjwSvjwSJifgzrmAKQS-_fD5mXxw25U839lFLgNwBKTYheOy0sRGidXOPbK8p0XOq9S7VOqVa36Vab5OUPZDu3f8j-g060Pqv |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202401695 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2024_1397466 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2025_e41715 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_024_05702_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s13099_024_00619_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15224738 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1112709 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addr_2023_115117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lpmfor_2024_10_001 crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2023_490 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40199_023_00480_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16203547 crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v15_i2_276 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_microb_2023_100009 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers17020226 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trecan_2025_01_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmogo_2024_100048 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2024_332815 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines13010100 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25136818 crossref_primary_10_1111_1751_7915_70115 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopha_2024_116912 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i35_3972 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13010081 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_024_03219_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms241813786 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15102668 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.03.003 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.034 10.1038/s43588-022-00247-8 10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6 10.1038/s41598-017-16289-2 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314281 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01261 10.1109/IV.2013.39 10.1038/nature09944 10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01387 10.1038/srep18594 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.010 10.1111/hel.12547 10.1080/19490976.2020.1762520 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00997 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319826 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 10.3390/ijms21249735 10.3390/microorganisms7010020 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004266 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.009 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951 10.1111/imm.12760 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317556 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324489 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00202 10.3389/fcimb.2021.749207 10.1038/s41467-019-12669-6 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00302 10.3390/cancers11040504 10.1128/Iai.70.5.2630-2639.2002 10.3322/caac.21660 10.1038/s41564-019-0541-3 10.1111/hel.12145 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QL 7T7 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. LK8 M0S M1P M7N M7P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12866-022-02594-y |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biological Sciences Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology Ecology |
EISSN | 1471-2180 |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014 PMC9308235 A711281003 35870901 10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LK5 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M7R MM. M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~02 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PMFND 3V. 7QL 7T7 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-c2eb99de8035abaf3cafb1e8fcfe073b7d59817595174534bac2da71ec9082493 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1471-2180 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:23:41 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:02:11 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 23:00:33 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:52:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:18:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:42:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:02:55 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:00:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:31:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:01 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Microbiota Gastric cancer Bacterial community Predictive model |
Language | English |
License | 2022. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c597t-c2eb99de8035abaf3cafb1e8fcfe073b7d59817595174534bac2da71ec9082493 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12866-022-02594-y |
PMID | 35870901 |
PQID | 2703783763 |
PQPubID | 42585 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9308235 proquest_miscellaneous_2693772627 proquest_journals_2703783763 gale_infotracmisc_A711281003 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A711281003 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A711281003 pubmed_primary_35870901 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_022_02594_y |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-07-23 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-07-23 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2022 text: 2022-07-23 day: 23 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC microbiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Microbiol |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | Q Cai (2594_CR2) 2019; 68 G Kadeerhan (2594_CR8) 2021; 11 JM Larsen (2594_CR32) 2017; 151 2594_CR39 2594_CR12 JL Espinoza (2594_CR40) 2018; 414 B Flemer (2594_CR42) 2017; 66 2594_CR14 2594_CR13 G Yu (2594_CR18) 2017; 7 N Sugimura (2594_CR43) 2021 H Sung (2594_CR1) 2021; 71 Z Zhai (2594_CR36) 2018; 48 OA Stewart (2594_CR3) 2020; 11 Z Wang (2594_CR7) 2020; 11 JA Tsatsaronis (2594_CR31) 2014; 10 X Long (2594_CR30) 2019; 4 G Ravegnini (2594_CR21) 2020; 21 CH Park (2594_CR10) 2019; 24 MA Adamu (2594_CR41) 2010; 25 E Bolyen (2594_CR22) 2019; 37 M Arumugam (2594_CR26) 2011; 473 CA Brennan (2594_CR29) 2019; 17 C Peng (2594_CR35) 2020; 11 N Castano-Rodriguez (2594_CR5) 2017; 7 BD Kaehler (2594_CR23) 2019; 10 B Armistead (2594_CR34) 2019; 431 2594_CR27 Y Zavros (2594_CR37) 2002; 70 2594_CR28 XH Chen (2594_CR20) 2019; 10 PI Costea (2594_CR15) 2018; 3 RM Ferreira (2594_CR4) 2018; 67 X Liu (2594_CR19) 2019; 40 JJY Sung (2594_CR11) 2020; 69 OO Coker (2594_CR6) 2018; 67 I Yang (2594_CR16) 2016; 6 MI Love (2594_CR24) 2014; 15 L Xiao (2594_CR25) 2022 D Liu (2594_CR9) 2021; 11 J Wu (2594_CR33) 2019; 12 SK Kwon (2594_CR38) 2021 CS Eun (2594_CR17) 2014; 19 |
References_xml | – volume: 3 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2594_CR15 publication-title: Nat Microbiol doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8 – volume: 12 start-page: 846 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR33 publication-title: Transl Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.03.003 – volume: 40 start-page: 336 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR19 publication-title: EBioMedicine doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.034 – year: 2022 ident: 2594_CR25 publication-title: Nature Computational Science doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00247-8 – volume: 17 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR29 publication-title: Nat Rev Microbiol doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 561 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 2594_CR8 publication-title: China Am J Cancer Res – volume: 7 start-page: 15957 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2594_CR5 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16289-2 – volume: 67 start-page: 1024 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 2594_CR6 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314281 – volume: 10 start-page: 1261 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR20 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01261 – ident: 2594_CR27 doi: 10.1109/IV.2013.39 – volume: 473 start-page: 174 issue: 7346 year: 2011 ident: 2594_CR26 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature09944 – volume: 25 start-page: 439 issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: 2594_CR41 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0 – volume: 11 start-page: 1387 year: 2020 ident: 2594_CR35 publication-title: Front Immunol doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01387 – volume: 6 start-page: 18594 year: 2016 ident: 2594_CR16 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/srep18594 – volume: 48 start-page: 897 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 2594_CR36 publication-title: Immunity doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.010 – volume: 24 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR10 publication-title: Helicobacter doi: 10.1111/hel.12547 – volume: 11 start-page: 1220 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 2594_CR3 publication-title: Gut Microbes doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1762520 – volume: 11 start-page: 997 year: 2020 ident: 2594_CR7 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00997 – volume: 69 start-page: 1572 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 2594_CR11 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319826 – ident: 2594_CR14 – volume: 37 start-page: 852 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR22 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 – volume: 21 start-page: 9735 issue: 24 year: 2020 ident: 2594_CR21 publication-title: Int J Mol Sci doi: 10.3390/ijms21249735 – ident: 2594_CR39 doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0072-8 – ident: 2594_CR28 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010020 – volume: 10 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 2594_CR31 publication-title: PLoS Pathog doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004266 – volume: 431 start-page: 2914 issue: 16 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR34 publication-title: J Mol Biol doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.035 – volume: 414 start-page: 147 year: 2018 ident: 2594_CR40 publication-title: Cancer Lett doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.009 – year: 2021 ident: 2594_CR43 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951 – volume: 151 start-page: 363 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 2594_CR32 publication-title: Immunology doi: 10.1111/imm.12760 – volume: 68 start-page: 1576 issue: 9 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR2 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317556 – year: 2021 ident: 2594_CR38 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324489 – volume: 66 start-page: 633 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 2594_CR42 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 – volume: 67 start-page: 226 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 2594_CR4 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205 – ident: 2594_CR13 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00202 – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: 2594_CR9 publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.749207 – volume: 10 start-page: 4643 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR23 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12669-6 – volume: 7 start-page: 302 year: 2017 ident: 2594_CR18 publication-title: Front Cell Infect Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00302 – ident: 2594_CR12 doi: 10.3390/cancers11040504 – volume: 70 start-page: 2630 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 2594_CR37 publication-title: Infect Immun doi: 10.1128/Iai.70.5.2630-2639.2002 – volume: 71 start-page: 209 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 2594_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 – volume: 4 start-page: 2319 issue: 12 year: 2019 ident: 2594_CR30 publication-title: Nat Microbiol doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0541-3 – volume: 19 start-page: 407 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 2594_CR17 publication-title: Helicobacter doi: 10.1111/hel.12145 – volume: 15 start-page: 550 issue: 12 year: 2014 ident: 2594_CR24 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 |
SSID | ssj0017837 |
Score | 2.470786 |
Snippet | Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and composition... Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity, and... Abstract Background Gastric microbial dysbiosis were reported to be associated with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to explore the variation, diversity,... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 184 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms Analysis Bacteria Bacteria - genetics Bacterial community Biopsy Cancer Carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis - pathology Carcinogens Care and treatment Cluster analysis Composition Data processing Datasets Diagnosis Dysbacteriosis Ecology Gastric cancer Gastric Mucosa - microbiology Gastritis Gastritis - complications Gastritis - microbiology Gastritis - pathology Gastritis, Atrophic - complications Gastritis, Atrophic - pathology Gastrointestinal Microbiome - genetics Health aspects Helicobacter Infections - microbiology Helicobacter pylori - genetics Humans Metaplasia Microbial activity Microbiomes Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microorganisms Predictive model Risk factors RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics rRNA 16S Stomach cancer Stomach Neoplasms Taxonomy Tumors Variance analysis Vegan Veganism |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxRBEG4kIHgRNT7GRGlF8CBDdnqmX8cohijoQQ3k1vQzBsxMyO4e9uRft6qnZ9lB0EsOy8J29e5O1dfV1TNVXxHyhuPNhBCaWgWe6k5aVSsbQ70Qrk2xUzxprB3-8lWcnnWfz_n5TqsvzAkb6YFHxR0xGwBUQuVKBiu0lYuoArxJnfwit7BmsOdNh6ny_EDCuWsqkVHiaAleWGCyLYMX1129mW1Dma3_b5-8synNEyZ3dqCTB-R-CR3p8fiXH5I7sX9E7o7NJDf75PfEL0KHRC8s9uPw9OpyJFq6ihS5mgBrdAXWizTg2u6zs5uE4Lv9WC6CJKvUFsPFQPFmLcyLdPA-8zn5uPsjHpFz85icnXz88eG0Lu0Vag-niFXtWXRah6gWLbfOptbb5Jqokk8RFr6TgWsF0YVGMmveds56Fqxsosc26Z1un5C9fujjM0Ktdg0TtnNgmq5D0jeBsaJkyTsWk6pIM2nb-MI9ji0wfpl8BlHCjBYyYCGTLWQ2FXm3nXM9Mm_8U_o9GnEriazZ-QPAkilYMv_DUkVeIwQM8mL0mHhzYdfLpfn0_Zs5lg0-cwQfWJG3RSgNcA3eljoG0ARSac0kD2eSsHD9fHhCmimOY2kYeGAEr4DhV9thnInJcH0c1iAjIKaUTDBZkacjMLfX3XJwwBDjVUTOIDtTzHykv_yZacV1Zi7iz29DkwfkHsurTdasPSR7q5t1fAHR28q9zAv1D1keQmM priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96Ivgifls9JYrgg5Tbpm0-nuSUO05BH9SDfQtpPtYDrz23uw_75L_uTJrWLcI9LLtsJrTNzPwySTO_IeRNjZsJzhW5dHXIK2FkLo13-YI3ZfCVrIPC3OEvX_nZefV5WS_ThlufjlWOmBiB2nUW98iPGJimkOgO769-51g1Ct-uphIaN8ktpC5DqxbLacFVoPyYKCP5UQ9YzPHILYNPrap8N5uMImf__8i8NzXNj03uzUOn98jdFEDS40Hj98kN3z4gt4eSkjv4dRJpqHcPyZ-Rb4R2ga4M1uew9PJiIF669BS5m8D26Aa06alDX28j-I1CcBU7pI8g6So1SZHeUdy8hX6edtZGfifr9y9i0ZLWj8j56cmPj2d5KreQW1hVbHLLfKOU83JR1qYxobQmNIWXwQYPQNAIVysJ0YZCcuu6rBpjmTOi8BbLpleqfEwO2q71Twk1qikYN1XjpasqJIHjGDsKFmzDfJAZKcZx1zZxkWNJjF86rkkk14OuNOhKR13pXUbeTX2uBiaOa6U_oDonSWTRjn9065VOTqmZcQBYXMYsGcOVEQu4YfgSKlhYO2bkNRqDRp6MFg_irMy27_Wn79_0sSjwHSRgYkbeJqHQwTNYk_IaYCSQWmsmeTiTBEe28-bR5nQCkl7_M_uMvJqasScejmt9twUZDjGmYJyJjDwZTHR67rIGQIaYLyNiZryzgZm3tBc_I824ikxG9bPrb-s5ucOiR4mclYfkYLPe-hcQp22al9EZ_wLzqz2x priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Analysis of gastric microbiome reveals three distinctive microbial communities associated with the occurrence of gastric cancer |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870901 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2703783763 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2693772627 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9308235 https://doaj.org/article/2ad5786868624a69a70e8d9a779fc014 |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9NAFB72grIv4t3oWqIIPki0mSRzeRDZyi6rsItUC8WXYTKXurCbaC9gn_zrnjNJaoOLDz60hc6ZtDm3OWcy5zuEvChwM8HaNBG28EnOtUiEdjYZsjLzLheFl1g7fHbOTif5x2kx3SFdu6OWgYtrUzvsJzWZX77--WP9Dgz-bTB4wd4swMcyPEpL4VXIPFnvkn1YmTh2NDjL_zxV4JCNdYUz1847IDezAjRYtj1iunUqwPn_7bS3Vq3-icqtJerkNrnVxpbxUaMMd8iOq-6SG023yfU98qsDIIlrH880Nuww8dVFg8R05WIEcwKmxEsQr4stGn8VvGFHBNc2TT0JorDGupWsszHu5sI8F9fGBMAn47Z_xKBqze-Tycnxl_enSdt_ITGQZiwTQ10ppXVimBW61D4z2pepE954B56h5LaQAsIPiWjXRZaX2lCreeoM9lHPZfaA7FV15R6RWMsypUznpRM2zxEVjmEwyak3JXVeRCTtuK1MC06OPTIuVUhSBFONsBQISwVhqXVEXm3mfG-gOf5JPUIhbigRVjt8Uc9nqrVSRbUFD8ZEKJvRTGo-hD8MH1x6A8lkRJ6jCigEzqjwZM5MrxYL9eHzWB3xFB9KgpOMyMuWyNdwD0a3hQ7ACcTa6lEe9ijBsk1_uNM01RmGouCiUY8ZDD_bDONMPC1XuXoFNAyCTk4Z5RF52Cjm5r47_Y4I76lsjzH9keriW8AdlwHaqHj83zOfkAMarI0nNDske8v5yj2FmG5ZDsgun_IB2R8dn38aD8LOyCAYL7yPR19_A26bUAU |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgQXxJuUAgaBOKCoGyexnQNCBVrt0scBWmlvxvFjqdQmZR9Ce-If8RuZcZJlI6Teeljtaj1RHM_4m7Hj-YaQ1zluJlibxNLmPs6ElrHUzsYDXqbeZTL3BeYOHx3z4Wn2ZZyPN8ifLhcGj1V2mBiA2tYG98h3GJimkDgdPlz-jLFqFL5d7UpoNGZx4Ja_YMk2ez_6DPp9w9j-3smnYdxWFYgNBM_z2DBXFoV1cpDmutQ-NdqXiZPeeAf2XgqbFxKcaoEcznmaldowq0XiDFYHz5B8CSD_BjjeAS72xHi1wEuwf11ijuQ7M8B-jkd8GXzyIouXPecXagT87wnWXGH_mOaa39u_S-60ASvdbSzsHtlw1X1ysylhuYRfe4H2evmA_O74TWjt6URjPRBDL84aoqcLR5ErCmydzsF6HLWILVUA204I7mKadBUkeaW6NRxnKW4Ww3WO1sYEPinj1m9i0HKnD8nptSjiEdms6so9IVQXZcK4zkonbZYh6RzHWFUwb0rmvIxI0o27Mi33OZbgOFdhDSS5anSlQFcq6EotI_Judc1lw_xxpfRHVOdKElm7wx_1dKJaEFBMWwBILkNWjuaFFgPoMHyJwhtYq0bkFRqDQl6OCg_-TPRiNlOjb1_VrkjwnSdgcETetkK-hmcwus2jgJFAKq-e5HZPEoDD9Js7m1MtcM3Uv2kWkZerZrwSD-NVrl6ADIeYVjDOREQeNya6eu40BwcAMWZERM94ewPTb6nOfgRa8yIwJ-VbV3frBbk1PDk6VIej44On5DYLs0vELN0mm_Ppwj2DGHFePg8Tk5Lv140EfwHFBnuW |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+gastric+microbiome+reveals+three+distinctive+microbial+communities+associated+with+the+occurrence+of+gastric+cancer&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Liu%2C+Dehua&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Rutong&rft.au=Chen%2C+Si&rft.au=Sun%2C+Baolin&rft.date=2022-07-23&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=22&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12866-022-02594-y&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35870901&rft.externalDocID=PMC9308235 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |