Data analysis with Shapley values for automatic subject selection in Alzheimer’s disease data sets using interpretable machine learning

• Published in: Alzheimer's research & therapy Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 155 - 30
• Main Authors: Bloch, Louise, Friedrich, Christoph M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 15.09.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: ADNI; AIBL; Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging; Alzheimer Disease - genetics; Alzheimer's disease; Australia; Biomarkers; Classification; Cognitive ability; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging; Computer-aided medical diagnosis; Data Analysis; Data mining; Data Shapley; Datasets; Dementia; Diagnosis; Discriminant analysis; Game theory; Humans; Interpretability; Machine Learning; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Methods; Neural networks; Noise; Older people; Shapley values; Australia; Germany; ADNI; Shapley values; Alzheimer’s disease; Interpretability; Mild cognitive impairment; Machine learning; AIBL; Data Shapley
• DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00879-4
• ISSN: 1758-9193

For the recruitment and monitoring of subjects for therapy studies, it is important to predict whether mild cognitive impaired (MCI) subjects will prospectively develop Alzheimer's disease (AD). Machine learning (ML) is suitable to improve early AD prediction. The etiology of AD is heterogeneous, which leads to high variability in disease patterns. Further variability originates from multicentric study designs, varying acquisition protocols, and errors in the preprocessing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The high variability makes the differentiation between signal and noise difficult and may lead to overfitting. This article examines whether an automatic and fair data valuation method based on Shapley values can identify the most informative subjects to improve ML classification. An ML workflow was developed and trained for a subset of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. The validation was executed for an independent ADNI test set and for the Australian Imaging, Biomarker and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL) cohort. The workflow included volumetric MRI feature extraction, feature selection, sample selection using Data Shapley, random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for model training as well as Kernel SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values for model interpretation. The RF models, which excluded 134 of the 467 training subjects based on their RF Data Shapley values, outperformed the base models that reached a mean accuracy of 62.64% by 5.76% (3.61 percentage points) for the independent ADNI test set. The XGBoost base models reached a mean accuracy of 60.00% for the AIBL data set. The exclusion of those 133 subjects with the smallest RF Data Shapley values could improve the classification accuracy by 2.98% (1.79 percentage points). The cutoff values were calculated using an independent validation set. The Data Shapley method was able to improve the mean accuracies for the test sets. The most informative subjects were associated with the number of ApolipoproteinE ε4 (ApoE ε4) alleles, cognitive test results, and volumetric MRI measurements.