Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 213 - 10
Main Authors Loch, Florian N., Asbach, Patrick, Haas, Matthias, Seeliger, Hendrik, Beyer, Katharina, Schineis, Christian, Degro, Claudius E., Margonis, Georgios A., Kreis, Martin E., Kamphues, Carsten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 18.08.2020
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's Index for the criterion "size" were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for "inhomogeneous signal intensity" 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for "border contour" 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
AbstractList Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's Index for the criterion "size" were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for "inhomogeneous signal intensity" 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for "border contour" 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
Abstract Background Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. Methods Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. Results Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). Conclusion Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients.BACKGROUNDLymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients.Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard.METHODSSixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard.Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's Index for the criterion "size" were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for "inhomogeneous signal intensity" 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for "border contour" 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031).RESULTSForty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's Index for the criterion "size" were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for "inhomogeneous signal intensity" 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for "border contour" 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031).Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.CONCLUSIONLymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
Background Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of expanded criteria in nodal staging in PDAC patients. Methods Sixty-six patients with histologically confirmed PDAC that underwent primary surgery were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT and/or MRI) were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to histopathology. Number and size of lymph nodes were measured (short-axis diameter) and characterized in terms of expanded morphological criteria of border contour (spiculated, lobulated, and indistinct) and texture (homogeneous or inhomogeneous). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated with histopathology as a reference standard. Results Forty-eight of 66 patients (80%) had histologically confirmed lymph node metastases (pN+). Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden’s Index for the criterion “size” were 44.2%, 82.4%, and 0.27; for “inhomogeneous signal intensity” 25.6%, 94.1%, and 0.20; and for “border contour” 62.7%, 52.9%, and 0.16, respectively. There was a significant association between the number of visible lymph nodes on preoperative CT and lymph node involvement (pN+, p = 0.031). Conclusion Lymph node staging in PDAC is mainly limited due to low sensitivity for detection of metastatic disease. Using expanded morphological criteria instead of size did not improve regional nodal staging due to sensitivity remaining low. Combining specific criteria yields improved sensitivity with specificity and PPV remaining high.
ArticleNumber 213
Audience Academic
Author Kreis, Martin E.
Asbach, Patrick
Haas, Matthias
Beyer, Katharina
Kamphues, Carsten
Schineis, Christian
Degro, Claudius E.
Loch, Florian N.
Margonis, Georgios A.
Seeliger, Hendrik
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Florian N.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1513-8339
  surname: Loch
  fullname: Loch, Florian N.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Patrick
  surname: Asbach
  fullname: Asbach, Patrick
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Matthias
  surname: Haas
  fullname: Haas, Matthias
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hendrik
  surname: Seeliger
  fullname: Seeliger, Hendrik
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Katharina
  surname: Beyer
  fullname: Beyer, Katharina
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Christian
  surname: Schineis
  fullname: Schineis, Christian
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Claudius E.
  surname: Degro
  fullname: Degro, Claudius E.
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Georgios A.
  surname: Margonis
  fullname: Margonis, Georgios A.
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Martin E.
  surname: Kreis
  fullname: Kreis, Martin E.
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Carsten
  surname: Kamphues
  fullname: Kamphues, Carsten
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstq3DAUhk1JaS7tC3RRBIXSjVPrZtmbwhB6CQS6adfijHTsUbClqWQH5lH6tpVnkjYTStHCQv7-_xwd_efFiQ8ei-I1rS4pbeoPibJWqrJiVVnRVtKSPyvOqFCqVA1tTx7tT4vzlG6rinEu-YvilLOGUsn4WfFrZcwcwexI6MgdRBfmREx0E0YHpAuRDLtxuyE-WCRpgt75njhP7GwmGAhY9MFANM6HERaPaYNkC95EhMkZskGwZL0jJozbeUJLpjCGPsJ2syPgLRmh97iAEVPwWYfEjfsqL4vnHQwJX91_L4ofnz99v_pa3nz7cn21uimNbMVUiq5RAjplm6pS3LYNgJRtI9Y1U8igtY2qKRpVWSPz5S1UYFrRVQawWyto-EVxffC1AW71NubycacDOL0_CLHXEHOHA2qJsmmEWYoJ0WEHlNOWoUVRK1krlr0-Hry283pEa9BPEYYj0-M_3m10H-60ErxumzYbvL83iOHnjGnSo0sGhwE85pfRTHApOZOMZvTtE_Q2zNHnUe2p3Fkt2V-qh3wB57uQ65rFVK9qLlpeU7ZQl_-g8rI4OpNT17l8fiR490iQH3mYNikM8-SCT8fgm8cT-TOKhwRmoDkAJoaUInbauAkWn9yCGzSt9BJ2fQi7zmHX-7DrRcqeSB_c_yP6DWPDAkU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_024_05776_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2022_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28048
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_11160_1
crossref_primary_10_1093_jnci_djae024
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000773
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2024_100553
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yacr_2022_04_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12071594
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2024_111510
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_09980_8
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_22126_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_024_01205_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_927077
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_10352_5
crossref_primary_10_17816_DD632008
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_23_01311
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40644_024_00687_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_025_11387_6
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_895515
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_16064_4
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_992906
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_024_03417_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_023_03940_y
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2005_3679
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07572_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14194672
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14061828
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.021
10.1007/s00535-018-1519-2
10.1016/0016-5085(92)91800-J
10.1007/s11605-011-1659-7
10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0268
10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242754
10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.005
10.1148/radiol.2272011747
10.1097/00000658-199506000-00011
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2fafa
10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01042.x
10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182550d77
10.1186/s12957-019-1687-4
10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.009
10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84
10.3310/hta22070
10.1007/s10620-010-1180-y
10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115622
10.1016/j.surg.2018.12.009
10.1245/s10434-008-9992-0
10.1002/jhbp.565
10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.029
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000855
10.1148/radiol.2016152798
10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.003
10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800475
10.1007/s00261-019-01900-z
10.1159/000368089
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QL
7QO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1477-7819
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5e5884cf7d844fefa13192ede4675672
PMC7436989
A634936122
32811523
10_1186_s12957_020_01951_3
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Germany
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Germany
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29R
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
3V.
7QL
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
K9.
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-4f874af7d80073d98aa55984b627e2a9d8761ec70dc5353da0ac94f0caefb7a83
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1477-7819
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:13 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:09:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:21:38 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 00:03:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:28:16 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:33:25 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:19:40 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:56:31 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:21:29 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Neoadjuvant therapy
Cross-sectional imaging
Computed tomography
Magnetic resonance imaging
Staging
Lymph nodes
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c594t-4f874af7d80073d98aa55984b627e2a9d8761ec70dc5353da0ac94f0caefb7a83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1513-8339
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-020-01951-3
PMID 32811523
PQID 2435319652
PQPubID 42870
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e5884cf7d844fefa13192ede4675672
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7436989
proquest_miscellaneous_2435532521
proquest_journals_2435319652
gale_infotracmisc_A634936122
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A634936122
gale_healthsolutions_A634936122
pubmed_primary_32811523
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_020_01951_3
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_020_01951_3
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-08-18
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-08-18
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-08-18
  day: 18
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle World journal of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 1951_CR2
JH Kim (1951_CR16) 2004; 52
S Heinrich (1951_CR26) 2005; 242
JD Brierley (1951_CR18) 2017
WJ Youden (1951_CR19) 1950; 3
A Asagi (1951_CR28) 2013; 42
RK Zeman (1951_CR9) 1997; 169
CJ Roche (1951_CR22) 2003; 180
MF Müller (1951_CR10) 1994; 190
T Du (1951_CR3) 2018; 215
A Nanashima (1951_CR21) 2010; 55
P Ghaneh (1951_CR30) 2018; 22
JM Laurence (1951_CR35) 2011; 15
JA Pietryga (1951_CR1) 2015; 6
E Rollvén (1951_CR14) 2019; 44
1951_CR20
AJ Lemke (1951_CR25) 2004; 45
S Isaji (1951_CR17) 2017
M Kitano (1951_CR33) 2019; 54
G Brown (1951_CR15) 2003; 227
HST Cao (1951_CR8) 2017; 162
T Asano (1951_CR6) 2018; 25
SP Kauhanen (1951_CR24) 2009; 250
KL Prenzel (1951_CR13) 2010; 36
JI Portuondo (1951_CR37) 2019; 165
Q Zhang (1951_CR4) 2016; 2016
HR Kim (1951_CR29) 2018; 39
CJ Yeo (1951_CR5) 1995; 221
MJ Midwinter (1951_CR11) 1999; 86
1951_CR34
JH Li (1951_CR31) 2014; 31
KH Lim (1951_CR36) 2012; 17
Y Endo (1951_CR7) 2019; 17
JM Farma (1951_CR23) 2008; 15
I Joo (1951_CR27) 2017; 282
T Rösch (1951_CR12) 1992; 102
H Nawaz (1951_CR32) 2013; 14
References_xml – volume: 215
  start-page: 472
  year: 2018
  ident: 1951_CR3
  publication-title: Am J Surg.
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.021
– volume: 54
  start-page: 19
  year: 2019
  ident: 1951_CR33
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol.
  doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1519-2
– volume: 102
  start-page: 188
  year: 1992
  ident: 1951_CR12
  publication-title: Gastroenterology.
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91800-J
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2059
  year: 2011
  ident: 1951_CR35
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg.
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1659-7
– volume: 17
  start-page: 192
  year: 2012
  ident: 1951_CR36
  publication-title: Oncologist.
  doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0268
– volume: 169
  start-page: 459
  year: 1997
  ident: 1951_CR9
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol.
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242754
– volume: 52
  start-page: 78
  year: 2004
  ident: 1951_CR16
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.005
– volume: 227
  start-page: 371
  year: 2003
  ident: 1951_CR15
  publication-title: Radiology.
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272011747
– volume: 221
  start-page: 721
  year: 1995
  ident: 1951_CR5
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00011
– ident: 1951_CR2
– volume: 250
  start-page: 957
  year: 2009
  ident: 1951_CR24
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2fafa
– ident: 1951_CR34
– volume: 86
  start-page: 189
  year: 1999
  ident: 1951_CR11
  publication-title: Br J Surg.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01042.x
– volume: 42
  start-page: 11
  year: 2013
  ident: 1951_CR28
  publication-title: Pancreas.
  doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182550d77
– volume: 17
  start-page: 145
  year: 2019
  ident: 1951_CR7
  publication-title: World J Surg Onc
  doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1687-4
– volume: 36
  start-page: 993
  year: 2010
  ident: 1951_CR13
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.009
– volume: 242
  start-page: 235
  year: 2005
  ident: 1951_CR26
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84
– volume: 6
  start-page: 343
  year: 2015
  ident: 1951_CR1
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol.
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1951_CR30
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess.
  doi: 10.3310/hta22070
– volume: 55
  start-page: 3617
  year: 2010
  ident: 1951_CR21
  publication-title: Dig Dis Sci.
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1180-y
– volume: 190
  start-page: 745
  year: 1994
  ident: 1951_CR10
  publication-title: Radiology.
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115622
– volume: 165
  start-page: 1144
  year: 2019
  ident: 1951_CR37
  publication-title: Surgery.
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.12.009
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2465
  year: 2008
  ident: 1951_CR23
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9992-0
– volume: 25
  start-page: 342
  year: 2018
  ident: 1951_CR6
  publication-title: J Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreat Sci.
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.565
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Pancreatic Cancer
  year: 2017
  ident: 1951_CR17
– ident: 1951_CR20
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.029
– volume: 39
  start-page: 691
  issue: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 1951_CR29
  publication-title: Nucl Med Commun.
  doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000855
– volume: 282
  start-page: 149
  year: 2017
  ident: 1951_CR27
  publication-title: Radiology.
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152798
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1951_CR4
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Res Pract.
– volume: 162
  start-page: 557
  year: 2017
  ident: 1951_CR8
  publication-title: Surgery.
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.003
– start-page: 93
  volume-title: UICC: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
  year: 2017
  ident: 1951_CR18
– volume: 3
  start-page: 32
  year: 1950
  ident: 1951_CR19
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1279
  year: 2004
  ident: 1951_CR25
  publication-title: J Nucl Med.
– volume: 180
  start-page: 475
  year: 2003
  ident: 1951_CR22
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol.
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800475
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1712
  year: 2019
  ident: 1951_CR14
  publication-title: Abdom Radiol.
  doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01900-z
– volume: 14
  start-page: 484
  year: 2013
  ident: 1951_CR32
  publication-title: JOP.
– volume: 31
  start-page: 297
  year: 2014
  ident: 1951_CR31
  publication-title: Digest Surg.
  doi: 10.1159/000368089
SSID ssj0023353
Score 2.373685
Snippet Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the...
Background Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was to...
Abstract Background Lymph node staging of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (PDAC) by cross-sectional imaging is limited. The aim of this study was...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 213
SubjectTerms Abdomen
Accuracy
Adenocarcinoma
Breast Neoplasms
Cancer
Care and treatment
Computed tomography
Contours
Criteria
Cross-sectional imaging
Diagnosis
Diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic systems
Diameters
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head
Histopathology
Humans
Lymph nodes
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic system
Lymphatics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical examination
Medical imaging
Metastases
Metastasis
Morphology
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology, Experimental
Pancreas
Pancreatic cancer
Patients
Prognosis
Quality
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Shape
Staging
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Li9RAEG5kD-JFfDu6aguCB2k26Ue6-ziKyyKsJxf21nT6oQM7yTI7K8xP8d9a1cmECYJevE5XkklV9VdVpOsrQt5lnUMItWW1aDyTprXMWF2x1IgqhNZXWWE38vnX5uxCfrlUlwejvvBM2EAPPCjuRCVspQxZRyNlTtnX4DQ8xQQ7XDW6oC_EvH0xNZZaQiixb5ExzckNRDWlGZZK2CBXMzELQ4Wt_09MPghK8wOTBxHo9AG5P6aOdDn85YfkTuoekbvn48fxx-TXMoTbjQ872mf6E2pgKOopgAKyMXsKySm92oHtaNfHRCEpxPFEdNVRZHyF-3pAIAhsG7hZv_Z4D8gNKYDFkFcGCrAdabujYRgEEem2X4-E19R3ka799w5bIilU8D3yeCS6WpenPCEXp5-_fTpj4-QFFpSVWyaz0dKjzvFLXrTGeyRyl23DdeLeRsDQOgVdxaBA09FXPliZq-BTbrU34ik56vouPSc0eaONSlHYFgIhV57zNobWcojOKfO4IPXeEC6MtOQ4HePKlfLENG4wngPjuWI8Jxbkw3TN9UDK8Vfpj2jfSRIJtcsP4GZudDP3LzdbkDfoHW7oTp1gwS0bIa2ANBEk3hcJBAZ4geDH_gZQA1JszSSPZ5KwocN8ee-BbgSUG8chrUW0VLD8dlrGK_GQXJfAo4qMEhwSsgV5Njjs9NKCG8j9OShDz1x5ppX5Srf6UejGIcfEKaMv_ocaX5J7vOxCw2pzTI62m9v0CrK6bfu6bODf7clL8g
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96gvgifls9NYLgg4Rrk6ZJn2QVj0M4nzzYt5Dm41y4bc_dPWH_FP9bZ9Ls3hXhXptJ2mQm89FkfkPIh6iic65qWSUay2rdtUy3qmShEaVznS2jxGzk0x_NyVn9fS7n-YfbOl-r3OnEpKj94PAf-REHu47iIvnny98Mq0bh6WouoXGX3EPoMpRqNb8OuAR02SXK6OZoDbZNKoYBE6bJVUxMjFHC7P9fM98wTdNrkzfs0PEj8jA7kHQ2cvwxuRP6J-T-aT4if0r-zpy7Wlm3pUOkfyAShtCegmpATGZLwUWlF1vgIO0HHyi4hlikiC56irivMK4FPQTmbQWDDUuLY4CHSEFljN6lo6C8Pe221I3lIDzdDMsMe01t7-nSnveYGEkhjh8QzSPQxTK95Rk5O_728-sJy_UXmJNtvWF11Kq2UXmN53m-1dYinHvdNVwFblsPmrQKTpXeSVhpb0vr2jqWzobYKavFc3LQD314SWiwWmkZvGg7MIdcWs4777qWg40OkfuCVDtGGJfBybFGxoVJQYpuzMg8A8wziXlGFOTTvs_lCM1xK_UX5O-eEmG104NhdW7yLjUyYN6uwynXdQzRViByPPgA5kQ2ihfkHUqHGXNU98rBzBpRtwKcRaD4mChQPcAEnM1ZDrAMCLQ1oTycUMK2dtPmnQSarFbW5noTFOT9vhl74lW5PoBEJRopOLhlBXkxCux-0oJriAA4LIaaiPJkVaYt_eJXAh0HTxNrjb66_bNekwc87S_NKn1IDjarq_AGvLZN9zZtzX995UOG
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Accuracy of various criteria for lymph node staging in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811523
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2435319652
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2435532521
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7436989
https://doaj.org/article/5e5884cf7d844fefa13192ede4675672
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3di9QwEA_3AeKL-O3quUYQfJBqm6RN-iCyK3ccwh5yuLD4EtIkPRd2W-3tifun-N86k3bLFQ992YfNNEvmezad3xDyqpSltTbJo4RnJhKqyCOVyzjyGY-tLUxcptiNPDvLTufi0yJd7JHduKOOgZc3lnY4T2rerN7--rH9AAb_Phi8yt5dQsxKZYSFELa_JRHfJ4cQmSRONJiJ_laBcR5QKRMhZSQhFO6aaG7cYxCoAp7_3177WtgavlJ5LUad3CV3uuSSTlptuEf2fHWf3Jp11-cPyO-JtVeNsVtal_QnVMlQ9lNwG4jXbCikr3S1BenSqnaeQtqIA4zosqKICQv7GvBREPoa2KxeG9wDskcK7qTNPC0Fx-5osaW2HRXh6KZed5DY1FSOrs1FhU2TFGr8GpE-PF2uw688JPOT4y8fT6NuNkNk01xsIlEqKUwpncK7PpcrYxDqXRQZk56Z3IGXTbyVsbMpcN2Z2NhclLE1viykUfwROajqyj8h1BslVeodzwsIlSw1jBXOFjmD-O1L5kYk2QlC2w64HOdnrHQoYFSmW-FpEJ4OwtN8RN70z3xvYTv-ST1F-faUCLkdvqibC91ZsE499vRaPLIQpS9NAt6Leech1KSZZCPyArVDt_2rvePQk4yLnEMiCRSvAwUqMxzAmq4DAtiAIFwDyqMBJZi8HS7vNFDvLEYzSHzRn6aw_LJfxifxNbrKg0YFmpQzSNlG5HGrsP2hOVNQHTBghhyo8oArw5Vq-S0AkkMWinNIn_6XA8_IbRZMTEWJOiIHm-bKP4ekblOMyb5cyDE5nB6ffT4fh79GxsF64fN8-vUPPbxOOg
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4lkWCjUSiAOymthJ7BwQWh7VlnZ7aqXejONHWamblH2A9qfwJ_iNzOSxbYTUW6-bibPxjL9vJvbMEPImyGCtjXMWi8ywRBU5U7mMmM9EZG1hopBiNvL4KBudJN9O09MN8rfLhcFjlR0m1kDtKovfyHc58DqaS8o_Xvxk2DUKd1e7FhqNWRz41W8I2eYf9r-Aft9yvvf1-POItV0FmE3zZMGSoGRignQKd6lcrozBIuVJkXHpuckd4EPsrYycTeGRzkTG5kmIrPGhkEYJGPcWuQ3EG2GwJ08vAzwB8l1ijsp258ClqWQYoGFaXsxEj_zqHgH_M8EVKuwf07zCe3sPyP3WYaXDxsIekg1fPiJ3xu2W_GPyZ2jtcmbsilaB_oLIu1rOKUAR1oA2FFxier4Ci6Fl5TwFVxSbItFJSbHOLIxrAPeATmcwWDU1OAZ4pBQgqvFmLQWycLRYUdu0n3B0UU3bMtvUlI5OzVmJiZh05jGqABumk2n9lCfk5EY085RsllXpnxHqjZIq9U7kBdAvTw3nhbNFzsEn8IG7AYk7RWjbFkPHnhznug6KVKYb5WlQnq6Vp8WAvF_fc9GUArlW-hPqdy2JZbzrH6rZmW5RQace84QtvnKSBB9MDCbOvfNAX2km-YDsoHXoJid2DUZ6mIkkF-CcgsS7WgLhCF7AmjarAqYBC3v1JLd7kgAjtn-5s0DdwthcXy66AXm9vox34tG80oNF1TKp4OAGDshWY7DrlxZcQcTBYTJkz5R7s9K_Uk5-1EXOwbPF3qbPr_9bO-Tu6Hh8qA_3jw5ekHu8XmuKxWqbbC5mS_8SPMZF8apeppR8v2lc-AeFBIET
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+various+criteria+for+lymph+node+staging+in+ductal+adenocarcinoma+of+the+pancreatic+head+by+computed+tomography+and+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Loch%2C+Florian+N&rft.au=Kreis%2C+Martin+E&rft.au=Seeliger%2C+Hendrik&rft.au=Beyer%2C+Katharina&rft.date=2020-08-18&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-020-01951-3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A634936122
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon