Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data
Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of rec...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC bioinformatics Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 347 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
28.10.2015
BioMed Central |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments.
In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results.
Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments.BACKGROUNDRecently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments.In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results.RESULTSIn this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results.Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis.CONCLUSIONSpearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. Background Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments. Results In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results. Conclusion Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments. In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. Background Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments. Results In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results. Conclusion Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. Keywords: RNA-Seq data, Gene expression, Normalization, Correlation, Poly-A tails Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels. Various normalization approaches have been proposed, owing to the importance of normalization in the analysis of RNA-Seq data. A comparison of recently proposed normalization methods is required to generate suitable guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate approach for future experiments. In this paper, we compared eight non-abundance (RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, Q, RPKM, and ERPKM) and two abundance estimation normalization methods (RSEM and Sailfish). The experiments were based on real Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq of 35- and 76-nucleotide sequences produced in the MAQC project and simulation reads. Reads were mapped with human genome obtained from UCSC Genome Browser Database. For precise evaluation, we investigated Spearman correlation between the normalization results from RNA-Seq and MAQC qRT-PCR values for 996 genes. Based on this work, we showed that out of the eight non-abundance estimation normalization methods, RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q gave similar normalization results for all data sets. For RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, RPKM showed the highest correlation results, but for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, least correlation was observed than the other methods. ERPKM did not improve results than RPKM. Between two abundance estimation normalization methods, for RNA-Seq of a 35-nucleotide sequence, higher correlation was obtained with Sailfish than that with RSEM, which was better than without using abundance estimation methods. However, for RNA-Seq of a 76-nucleotide sequence, the results achieved by RSEM were similar to without applying abundance estimation methods, and were much better than with Sailfish. Furthermore, we found that adding a poly-A tail increased alignment numbers, but did not improve normalization results. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that RC, UQ, Med, TMM, DESeq, and Q did not noticeably improve gene expression normalization, regardless of read length. Other normalization methods were more efficient when alignment accuracy was low; Sailfish with RPKM gave the best normalization results. When alignment accuracy was high, RC was sufficient for gene expression calculation. And we suggest ignoring poly-A tail during differential gene expression analysis. |
| ArticleNumber | 347 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Ryu, Keun Ho Piao, Yongjun Shon, Ho Sun Li, Peipei |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Peipei surname: Li fullname: Li, Peipei – sequence: 2 givenname: Yongjun surname: Piao fullname: Piao, Yongjun – sequence: 3 givenname: Ho Sun surname: Shon fullname: Shon, Ho Sun – sequence: 4 givenname: Keun Ho surname: Ryu fullname: Ryu, Keun Ho |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kkuLFDEUhQsZcR76A9xIgRtd1JhU5VG1EZrGR8OgMKPrcE0lVWlSSU-SEsdfb_rhMD2IZJGQ-52Ty805L06cd6ooXmJ0iXHL3kVct7SrEKYV4ryt-JPiDBOOqxojevLgfFqcx7hGCPMW0WfFac0oxjWiZ8V66acNBOOGMo2qdD5MYM1vSMa7clJp9H0stQ-7am-0VkG5ZMCW4MDeRRNLr8uVtfNkHJSjGcYqjcHPw7iZU3n9ZVHdqNuyhwTPi6cabFQvDvtF8f3jh2_Lz9XV10-r5eKqkrQjqSIdSJmbY7ViijDSyL5hQBDVhGqGOOpa3XJoaFOTvlVEagZNPjAOdccJay6K93vfzfxjUr3M_QawYhPMBOFOeDDiuOLMKAb_UxBWU1632eDNwSD421nFJCYTpbIWnPJzFDhDjGNMSUZfP0LXfg55MluKd7zt8K6jAzWAVcI47fO7cmsqFpTghrYNrzN1-Q8qr15NRuaf1ybfHwneHgkyk9SvNMAco1jdXB-zrx4O5X4af5OQAbwHZPAxBqXvEYzENm1inzaR0ya2aRM8a_gjjTRpF53cubH_Uf4B2pPXAg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_bib_bbae241 crossref_primary_10_1261_rna_074922_120 crossref_primary_10_1039_D4FO02854F crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_76881_x crossref_primary_10_1177_0271678X20953912 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12125895 crossref_primary_10_1093_bib_bbx008 crossref_primary_10_1128_mSystems_00457_20 crossref_primary_10_1128_aem_02175_21 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11738_020_3013_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_019_3247_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_virs_2024_02_003 crossref_primary_10_3892_mmr_2019_10289 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_020_6502_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bdq_2015_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcv_2021_104812 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_021_02578_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2016_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1089_ars_2017_7262 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13059_019_1878_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2019_05_060 crossref_primary_10_33549_physiolres_935389 crossref_primary_10_1093_bib_bbaa035 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy14040704 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_018_5362_x crossref_primary_10_1109_TCBB_2018_2866994 crossref_primary_10_1002_ggn2_202200024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gene_2021_145908 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2016_00164 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkz621 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2024_137248 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10722_023_01663_z crossref_primary_10_3390_genes10010046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbj_2021_05_040 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_12093_1 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_12093_2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0182694 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_00185_16 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_170830 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms232415836 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41396_019_0494_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_018_03575_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_022_08673_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41540_024_00448_z crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0206312 crossref_primary_10_3390_f10030275 crossref_primary_10_1093_bioinformatics_bty629 crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2023_2222754 crossref_primary_10_1093_nar_gkae552 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_018_2246_7 crossref_primary_10_1515_jib_2017_0025 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2019_00097 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13258_023_01444_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_019_3042_8 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1717794115 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12920_019_0538_z crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_6918797 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2019_00400 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micinf_2023_105218 crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2023_2244139 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11540_021_09527_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_021_03244_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12091444 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jip_2017_02_006 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy12092030 crossref_primary_10_1515_helia_2018_0012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envexpbot_2018_09_017 crossref_primary_10_1093_jambio_lxac086 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdiacomp_2017_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcp_2024_101985 crossref_primary_10_1049_iet_sen_2018_5420 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dci_2016_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_17614_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13059_025_03525_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_01212 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2025_1561203 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_09094_4 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_3000481 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0230594 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmb_2021_166966 crossref_primary_10_1214_20_AOAS1407 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_06500_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_bit_26290 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csbj_2022_11_051 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_96055_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0204124 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbinf_2021_693836 crossref_primary_10_1093_bib_bbab193 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0263344 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2018_11_030 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41374_018_0125_5 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2017_00626 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_833989 crossref_primary_10_1111_eci_12801 crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_5681174 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41430_021_01041_x crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0190152 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pcbi_1007869 crossref_primary_10_1002_wrna_1385 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2021_589160 crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens9010024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiosc_2019_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_stem_2017_06_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_024_10414_y crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0163125 crossref_primary_10_1111_pbi_12840 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrg_2016_114 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_019_5926_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2017_01876 crossref_primary_10_1089_cbr_2024_0102 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2017_00271 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88209_4 crossref_primary_10_21105_joss_02161 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12864_019_6073_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_DCR_0000000000001567 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes10080628 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_4600 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 10.1093/nar/30.1.207 10.1101/gr.079558.108 10.1093/nar/gkr1196 10.1093/bib/bbs046 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03193.x 10.1093/nar/gkq1015 10.1186/1471-2105-14-370 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 10.1038/nbt.2862 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 10.1038/35057062 10.1002/pmic.201100189 10.1038/nrg2484 10.2144/000112900 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts602 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 10.1016/j.phrp.2014.08.004 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185 10.1016/j.phrp.2014.06.006 10.1089/nat.2012.0367 10.1007/s00109-006-0097-6 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-220 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 10.1038/scientificamerican0106-46 10.1038/nmeth.1226 10.1016/j.arr.2009.10.006 10.1038/nature07638 10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1 10.1038/nmeth1156 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v12.i3-4.40 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright BioMed Central 2015 Li et al. 2015 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2015 – notice: Li et al. 2015 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88E 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Biological Sciences Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database Biological Science Database ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2105 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC4625728 4016835001 A541358372 26511205 10_1186_s12859_015_0778_7 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADMLS ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO ICD IHR INH INR ISR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P MK~ ML0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XH6 XSB -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF M0N NPM PMFND 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-49acc12062e6e4643cd36a405f45f607098f87a35324d8e4cf6a3d8e67a297463 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:33:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 12:19:42 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:51:04 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:06:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:01:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 05:58:38 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:18:07 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:35 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:38:21 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c594t-49acc12062e6e4643cd36a405f45f607098f87a35324d8e4cf6a3d8e67a297463 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7 |
| PMID | 26511205 |
| PQID | 1779789146 |
| PQPubID | 44065 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4625728 proquest_miscellaneous_1728671154 proquest_journals_1779789146 gale_infotracmisc_A541358372 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A541358372 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A541358372 pubmed_primary_26511205 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_015_0778_7 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12859_015_0778_7 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2015-10-28 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-10-28 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2015 text: 2015-10-28 day: 28 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC bioinformatics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Bioinformatics |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central |
| References | A Oshlack (778_CR14) 2010; 11 S Lee (778_CR18) 2011; 39 B Li (778_CR22) 2011; 12 S Anders (778_CR6) 2010; 11 Z Wang (778_CR15) 2009; 10 R Morin (778_CR12) 2008; 45 R Edgar (778_CR29) 2002; 30 R Patro (778_CR23) 2014; 32 WB Barbazuk (778_CR8) 2007; 51 F Li (778_CR17) 2014; 5 JC Marioni (778_CR13) 2008; 18 SC Schuster (778_CR3) 2008; 5 H Rehrauer (778_CR32) 2013; 14 Y Chu (778_CR11) 2012; 22 ES Lander (778_CR25) 2001; 409 MD Robinson (778_CR19) 2010; 11 JH Schefe (778_CR28) 2006; 84 C Trapnell (778_CR7) 2012; 7 MY Galperin (778_CR27) 2012; 40 MR Teixeira (778_CR9) 2006; 12 BM Bolstad (778_CR20) 2003; 19 MA Dillies (778_CR24) 2013; 14 M Li (778_CR1) 2014; 5 B Li (778_CR26) 2010; 26 GK Smyth (778_CR31) 2005 B Langmead (778_CR30) 2009; 10 GM Church (778_CR5) 2006; 294 CA Maher (778_CR10) 2009; 458 Y Piao (778_CR16) 2012; 28 A Mortazavi (778_CR21) 2008; 5 P Li (778_CR2) 2011; 11 J Hauke (778_CR33) 2011; 30 JP Magalhães de (778_CR4) 2010; 9 22988256 - Brief Bioinform. 2013 Nov;14(6):671-83 24752080 - Nat Biotechnol. 2014 May;32(5):462-4 20979621 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106 17662031 - Plant J. 2007 Sep;51(5):910-8 19015660 - Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63 16468433 - Sci Am. 2006 Jan;294(1):46-54 18611170 - Biotechniques. 2008 Jul;45(1):81-94 25389514 - Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014 Oct;5(5):279-85 21059678 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(2):e9 11752295 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10 20022975 - Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 15;26(4):493-500 19900591 - Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Jul;9(3):315-23 21176179 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(12):220 18165802 - Nat Methods. 2008 Jan;5(1):16-8 19261174 - Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25 18516045 - Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8 22830413 - Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012 Aug;22(4):271-4 25379372 - Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014 Aug;5(4):211-8 11237011 - Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921 20196867 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R25 22144685 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D1-8 17425505 - Crit Rev Oncog. 2006 Dec;12(3-4):257-71 21761564 - Proteomics. 2011 Oct;11(19):3793-801 21816040 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323 16972087 - J Mol Med (Berl). 2006 Nov;84(11):901-10 22383036 - Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar;7(3):562-78 19136943 - Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):97-101 18550803 - Genome Res. 2008 Sep;18(9):1509-17 12538238 - Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):185-93 23060613 - Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3306-15 24365034 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:370 |
| References_xml | – volume: 11 start-page: R25 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 778_CR19 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 – volume: 30 start-page: 207 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 778_CR29 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207 – volume: 18 start-page: 1509 issue: 9 year: 2008 ident: 778_CR13 publication-title: Genome Res doi: 10.1101/gr.079558.108 – volume: 40 start-page: D1 issue: Database issue year: 2012 ident: 778_CR27 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1196 – volume: 14 start-page: 671 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 778_CR24 publication-title: Brief Bioinform doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs046 – volume: 51 start-page: 910 issue: 5 year: 2007 ident: 778_CR8 publication-title: Plant J doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03193.x – volume: 39 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 778_CR18 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1015 – volume: 14 start-page: 370 year: 2013 ident: 778_CR32 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-370 – volume: 7 start-page: 562 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 778_CR7 publication-title: Nat Protoc doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 – volume: 11 start-page: R106 issue: 10 year: 2010 ident: 778_CR6 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 – volume: 32 start-page: 462 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 778_CR23 publication-title: Nat Biotechnol doi: 10.1038/nbt.2862 – volume: 10 start-page: R25 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 778_CR30 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 – volume: 409 start-page: 860 issue: 6822 year: 2001 ident: 778_CR25 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/35057062 – volume: 11 start-page: 3793 issue: 19 year: 2011 ident: 778_CR2 publication-title: Proteomics doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100189 – volume: 10 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 778_CR15 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg2484 – volume: 45 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 778_CR12 publication-title: Biotechniques doi: 10.2144/000112900 – volume: 28 start-page: 3306 issue: 24 year: 2012 ident: 778_CR16 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts602 – volume: 12 start-page: 323 year: 2011 ident: 778_CR22 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 – volume: 5 start-page: 279 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 778_CR17 publication-title: Osong Public Health Res Perspect doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2014.08.004 – volume: 19 start-page: 185 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 778_CR20 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185 – volume: 5 start-page: 211 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 778_CR1 publication-title: Osong Public Health Res Perspect doi: 10.1016/j.phrp.2014.06.006 – volume: 22 start-page: 271 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 778_CR11 publication-title: Nucleic Acid Ther doi: 10.1089/nat.2012.0367 – start-page: 397 volume-title: Limma: linear models for microarray data year: 2005 ident: 778_CR31 – volume: 84 start-page: 901 issue: 11 year: 2006 ident: 778_CR28 publication-title: J Mol Med (Berl) doi: 10.1007/s00109-006-0097-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 220 issue: 12 year: 2010 ident: 778_CR14 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-220 – volume: 26 start-page: 493 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 778_CR26 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 – volume: 294 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 778_CR5 publication-title: Sci Am doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0106-46 – volume: 5 start-page: 621 issue: 7 year: 2008 ident: 778_CR21 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1226 – volume: 9 start-page: 315 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 778_CR4 publication-title: Ageing Res Rev doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2009.10.006 – volume: 458 start-page: 97 issue: 7234 year: 2009 ident: 778_CR10 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/nature07638 – volume: 30 start-page: 87 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 778_CR33 publication-title: Quaestiones Geographicae doi: 10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1 – volume: 5 start-page: 16 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 778_CR3 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth1156 – volume: 12 start-page: 257 issue: 3–4 year: 2006 ident: 778_CR9 publication-title: Ciritical Rev Oncogenesis doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v12.i3-4.40 – reference: 17662031 - Plant J. 2007 Sep;51(5):910-8 – reference: 25379372 - Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014 Aug;5(4):211-8 – reference: 25389514 - Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014 Oct;5(5):279-85 – reference: 22988256 - Brief Bioinform. 2013 Nov;14(6):671-83 – reference: 11237011 - Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921 – reference: 16468433 - Sci Am. 2006 Jan;294(1):46-54 – reference: 21761564 - Proteomics. 2011 Oct;11(19):3793-801 – reference: 11752295 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10 – reference: 12538238 - Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):185-93 – reference: 22144685 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D1-8 – reference: 23060613 - Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3306-15 – reference: 18516045 - Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8 – reference: 21816040 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323 – reference: 22830413 - Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012 Aug;22(4):271-4 – reference: 16972087 - J Mol Med (Berl). 2006 Nov;84(11):901-10 – reference: 20022975 - Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 15;26(4):493-500 – reference: 19136943 - Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):97-101 – reference: 18550803 - Genome Res. 2008 Sep;18(9):1509-17 – reference: 17425505 - Crit Rev Oncog. 2006 Dec;12(3-4):257-71 – reference: 21176179 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(12):220 – reference: 20979621 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106 – reference: 19015660 - Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63 – reference: 18611170 - Biotechniques. 2008 Jul;45(1):81-94 – reference: 19900591 - Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Jul;9(3):315-23 – reference: 18165802 - Nat Methods. 2008 Jan;5(1):16-8 – reference: 19261174 - Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25 – reference: 24752080 - Nat Biotechnol. 2014 May;32(5):462-4 – reference: 24365034 - BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:370 – reference: 22383036 - Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar;7(3):562-78 – reference: 20196867 - Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R25 – reference: 21059678 - Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(2):e9 |
| SSID | ssj0017805 |
| Score | 2.5264292 |
| Snippet | Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression levels.... Background Recently, rapid improvements in technology and decrease in sequencing costs have made RNA-Seq a widely used technique to quantify gene expression... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 347 |
| SubjectTerms | Base Sequence Comparative analysis Correlation analysis Databases, Genetic Genes Genome, Human High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Humans Methods Polyadenylation Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction RNA - chemistry RNA - genetics Sequence Alignment Sequence Analysis, RNA |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagCIkL4k2gIIOQkJCiJo5fOaFVxdIi0UNLpd4sx7FL0crZkt0D_56ZxBsaDr2t5Ik3ycx4ZuLx9xHyQTmGKGMqbxrZIqg2-JzHszKubqXwTBUeDzh_P5FH5_zbhbhIH9z61Fa5WxOHhbrtHH4jPyiVgoKnBsf-vL7OkTUKd1cThcZdcq-ESIMtXXr5ddpFQLz-tJNZannQl4jWBsWzyAsFxZOaxaL_V-QbIWneLnkj_iwfkYcpcaSLUdOPyR0fn5D7I5Xkn6fk1-FIKBgvKaR0NGIqukpnLOlIE91TSFCH0R0rCnj3itoES0K7QI-R9_gqWoooxnni8FlvN_T0ZJGf-WuKDaXPyPnyy4_DozzxKORO1HyT89o6V7JCMi89hxTEtZW0kKkFLoIEn6910MpWApKrVnvugrQV_JDKMig3ZPWc7MUu-peE1jAHL3RgyB6ua9nUbRAwY8HLJnBZZKTYvVHjEsg4cl2szFBsaGlGJRhQgkElGJWRT9Ml6xFh4zbh96gmg8gVEVtjLu22783x2alZwC1VAuptlpGPSSh08OfOppMG8AgIdjWT3J9Jgmu5-fDOGkxy7d78M8SMvJuG8UpsV4u-26IMQ9xASE8z8mI0nunZmMQctxAZUTOzmgQQ8Hs-Eq9-DsDfHIpVmPnV7bf1mjxgaOMQYJneJ3ub31v_BjKnTfN2cI-_x-QWEg priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511205 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1779789146 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1728671154 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4625728 |
| Volume | 16 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fa9swED76g8Fexn7XWxe0MRgMvNmyLNkPY3ilWRtoGMkCeRO2LHcdwWnrBNb_fne2ktWjjL04Bp2VWLrzfRdL3wfwVhlOLGPKLwpZEqk2xpylvTImLWVsuQosbXA-G8uTmRjN4_kObOSt3AA2d5Z2pCc1u158-HV18xkD_lMb8In82ITEwoZFcewHCositQv7mJgUCRqciT8vFYi-v91spEIfK53YveS8s4temvr7YX0rW_VXUt5KTcOH8MBhSpZ1TvAIdmz9GO51KpM3T-DnUac1WJ8zRHusJpS6cNsvWacg3TDErm3rRjAFA3_BcsdYwpYVOyVJ5Is6Z0Rw7Dt5n8v1ik3GmT-1V4zWmj6F2fD4-9GJ7yQWfBOnYuWLNDcm5IHkVlqB6MSUkcwRxFUiriQ-DtKkSlQexYi7ysQKU8k8whOpco6ViIyewV69rO0BsBT7EEFScRIWT1JZpGUVY4-BCItKyMCDYDOi2jj-cZLBWOi2Dkmk7iZB4yRomgStPHi_veSyI9_4l_EbmiZNpBY1rZo5z9dNo0-nE53hT4piLMW5B--cUbXELze524SAt0A8WD3Lw54lRp3pN2-8QW-cVodKYVGeYvLx4PW2ma6klWy1Xa7JhhOlICJXD553zrO9Ny4J_gaxB6rnVlsD4gLvt9QXP1pOcIF1LPb84n8G4SXc5-TpmIF5cgh7q-u1fYXQalUMYFfNFR6T4dcB7GfZaDrCzy_H42-TQft3xaANqd9CVSK5 |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIgQXxJtAAYNASEhRE8exkwNCq8KyS9s99CH1ZhLHKUWrZEt2hfqn-I3MbJzQcOitt5U88SbxjGcmnvk-gLfKcEIZU36ey4JAtdHmLPXKmLSQseUqsNTgvD-Tk2Px7SQ-2YA_XS8MlVV2e-J6oy5qQ9_It0OlMOFJ0bA_Lc59Yo2i09WOQqNVi1178RtTtubj9DOu7zvOx1-Odia-YxXwTZyKpS_SzJiQB5JbaQU6ZFNEMsO4pRRxKdEC0qRMVBbFGGoUiRWmlFmEP6TKOAbfMsJ5b8BNEaEnp8708df-1IL4AdzJaZjI7SYkdDhM1mM_UJisqYHv-98DXHKBw_LMS_5ufA_uukCVjVrNug8btnoAt1rqyouH8HOnJTCsThmGkKyi0HfuejpZS0vdMAyI16MdCwvuJnOWORgUVpdsSjzLZ1XGCDXZd5xBi9WSHcxG_qE9Z1TA-giOr-UNP4bNqq7sU2ApziGCpOTEVp6kMk-LMsYZAxHmpZCBB0H3RrVxoObErTHX6-QmkbpdBI2LoGkRtPLgQ3_JokX0uEr4DS2TJqSMikpxTrNV0-jp4YEe4S1FMeb33IP3Tqis8c9N5job8BEIXGsguTWQRFM2w-FOG7TbShr9T_E9eN0P05VUHlfZekUynHAKMRz24EmrPP2zcUkxdRB7oAZq1QsQwPhwpDr7sQYaF5gc48zPrr6tV3B7crS_p_ems93ncIeTvqNz58kWbC5_rewLjNqW-cu1qTD4ft22-Rch6FFu |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+normalization+methods+for+the+differential+analysis+of+Illumina+high-throughput+RNA-Seq+data&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Li%2C+Peipei&rft.au=Piao%2C+Yongjun&rft.au=Shon%2C+Ho+Sun&rft.au=Ryu%2C+Keun+Ho&rft.date=2015-10-28&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2105&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12859-015-0778-7&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A541358372 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |