Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia)

• Published in: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 367; no. 1598; pp. 1995 - 2006
• Main Authors: Stobbe, Nina, Westphal-Fitch, Gesche, Aust, Ulrike, Fitch, W. Tecumseh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 19.07.2012
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Artificial Grammar Learning; Birds; Columbidae - physiology; Comparative Research; Concept Formation - physiology; Discrimination, Psychological; Experimentation; Female; Formal Language Theory; Generalization, Stimulus - physiology; Grammar; Humans; Learning; Learning - physiology; Male; Middle Aged; Pattern Learning; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology; Pigeons; Psittaciformes - physiology; Simultaneous Presentation; Species Specificity; Tiles; Training; Visual learning; Visual Stimuli; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0962-8436; 1471-2970; 1471-2970
• DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0096

Artificial grammar learning (AGL) provides a useful tool for exploring rule learning strategies linked to general purpose pattern perception. To be able to directly compare performance of humans with other species with different memory capacities, we developed an AGL task in the visual domain. Presenting entire visual patterns simultaneously instead of sequentially minimizes the amount of required working memory. This approach allowed us to evaluate performance levels of two bird species, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia), in direct comparison to human participants. After being trained to discriminate between two types of visual patterns generated by rules at different levels of computational complexity and presented on a computer screen, birds and humans received further training with a series of novel stimuli that followed the same rules, but differed in various visual features from the training stimuli. Most avian and all human subjects continued to perform well above chance during this initial generalization phase, suggesting that they were able to generalize learned rules to novel stimuli. However, detailed testing with stimuli that violated the intended rules regarding the exact number of stimulus elements indicates that neither bird species was able to successfully acquire the intended pattern rule. Our data suggest that, in contrast to humans, these birds were unable to master a simple rule above the finite-state level, even with simultaneous item presentation and despite intensive training.