Is India ready for mental health apps (MHApps)? A quantitative-qualitative exploration of caregivers’ perspective on smartphone-based solutions for managing severe mental illnesses in low resource settings

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 13; no. 9; p. e0203353
• Main Authors: Sinha Deb, Koushik, Tuli, Anupriya, Sood, Mamta, Chadda, Rakesh, Verma, Rohit, Kumar, Saurabh, Ganesh, Ragul, Singh, Pushpendra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 19.09.2018; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acceptability; Applications programs; Biology and Life Sciences; Bipolar disorder; Caregivers; Cellular telephones; Computer and Information Sciences; Demographic aspects; Diagnosis; Engineering and Technology; Illnesses; Intervention; Language; Medical personnel; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental health care; Mobile applications; Mobile computing; Patients; People and Places; Physicians; Smart phones; Smartphones; Social Sciences; Technology; Technology application; Technology utilization; India; New York; United States > US
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203353
• ISSN: 1932-6203

Mobile application based delivery of psycho-social interventions may help reduce the treatment gap for severe mental illnesses (SMIs) and decrease the burden on caregivers. Apps developed in high income settings show effectiveness, but they suffer from lack of applicability in low resource scenarios due to the difference in technology penetration, affordability, and acceptance. This study aimed to understand health technology usage, perceived needs, and acceptability of app based interventions in patients with SMIs to improve illness management and reduce caregiver burden. The study was conducted in inpatient and outpatient settings of a tertiary care center in North India. A cross-sectional survey assessed smartphone and health app usage. Further, three focus group discussions evaluated the needs and apprehensions in using apps in management of SMIs. A total of 176 participants including 88 patients and 88 caregivers completed the survey. Smartphone ownership was similar to the national average (30%) in both caregivers (38.6%) and in patients (31.8%). Although subjects regularly used a third party app, health app usage was very low. Cost, unfamiliarity, and language were significant barriers to adoption. The focus group discussions provided insight into the various apprehensions of caregivers in using and in allowing patients to use smartphones and such apps. Caregivers wanted mobile apps for accessing information regarding services and resources available for people with SMI, and they felt such apps can be helpful if they could automate some of their routine caregiving activities. However, the significant difficulty was perceived in regards to the cost of the device, language of the medium, and unfamiliarity in using technology. Apprehensions that SMI patients might misuse technology, or damage the device were also prevalent. The study systematically looks into the scope, design considerations and limitations of implementing a mobile technology based intervention for low resource settings. With only one-third of the patients and caregivers having access to smartphones and internet, parallel outreach strategies like IVRS should be actively considered while designing interventions. The difficulty of understanding and searching in a non-native language needs to be addressed. Hand holding of caregivers and frequent encouragement from treating doctors might significantly help in technology adoption and in surmounting the apprehensions related to using technology. To make the solution acceptable and useful to the already over-burdened caregivers, developers need to work closely with patients' family members and follow a ground-up collaborative approach to app development. The scope of delivering mental health services through technology is immense in resource constrained settings like India, provided we, researchers, appreciate and accept the fact that in the varied landscape of a divergent economic, educational, and cultural milieu, a single solution will never suffice for all, and intervention modality matching with end user capacity will be of paramount importance in determining the success of the endeavor.