Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi

This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of radiation research Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 257 - 264
Main Authors Nemoto, Takafumi, Futakami, Natsumi, Yagi, Masamichi, Kumabe, Atsuhiro, Takeda, Atsuya, Kunieda, Etsuo, Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 23.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
AbstractList This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 * 128 * 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation [R] Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined . The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation Ⓡ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( P  < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
ABSTRACTThis study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 * 128 * 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation [R] Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. Keywords: semantic segmentation; U-Net; lung cancer; trachea; main bronchi
Audience Academic
Author Nemoto, Takafumi
Yagi, Masamichi
Takeda, Atsuya
Kumabe, Atsuhiro
Kunieda, Etsuo
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Futakami, Natsumi
AuthorAffiliation 1 Division of Radiation Oncology , Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
5 Radiation Oncology Center , Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan
3 Department of Radiology , Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
2 Department of Radiation Oncology , Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan
4 HPC&AI Business Dept. , Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 5 Radiation Oncology Center , Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan
– name: 1 Division of Radiation Oncology , Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
– name: 2 Department of Radiation Oncology , Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan
– name: 4 HPC&AI Business Dept. , Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan
– name: 3 Department of Radiology , Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Takafumi
  surname: Nemoto
  fullname: Nemoto, Takafumi
  email: takatohoku@gmail.com
  organization: Division of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Natsumi
  surname: Futakami
  fullname: Futakami, Natsumi
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Masamichi
  surname: Yagi
  fullname: Yagi, Masamichi
  organization: HPC&AI Business Dept., Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Atsuhiro
  surname: Kumabe
  fullname: Kumabe, Atsuhiro
  organization: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Atsuya
  surname: Takeda
  fullname: Takeda, Atsuya
  organization: Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Etsuo
  surname: Kunieda
  fullname: Kunieda, Etsuo
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Naoyuki
  surname: Shigematsu
  fullname: Shigematsu, Naoyuki
  organization: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kl1rFDEUhoNU7LZ64w-QgAhFnPZMMp83QmnrBxS9sdchk5zZzZJJ1mSmWP9D_7NZp1W3FMlFQvKch5zkPSB7zjsk5GUOxzm0_GQdwkkIP6GpnpBFzos2a_Oy3iMLKNKaQwX75CDGNQCroYRnZJ8zKHjJmgW5veh7o6S6oXgt7SRH4x31PWXn7yg_p1fZFxxpxEG60ai0WA7oxpmSTlM5WhmzTkbUu4dJ4XwYpKV2cstI8YeykzZuSccV0jFItUL5WzFI42gXvFMr85w87aWN-OJuPiRXHy6-nX3KLr9-_Hx2epmpsuVj1nQgsZe6hwrbtgLUnHOtm1aztla6Uwg9q0uVK5Zj33YNUxIU69pClbLDgh-S97N3M3UDapWuHaQVm2AGGW6El0bsnjizEkt_LWpWVFA2SXB0Jwj--4RxFIOJCq2VDv0UBeMlLxtWNVv09QN07afgUnuC53WeNwA1_KWW0qIwrvfbN9pKxWnFWDLV1ZY6foRKQ-NgVEpFb9L-TsGrfxv90-F9ABIAM6CCjzFgL5SZvzCZjRU5iG3GRMqYmDOWSt4-KLm3Pgq_mWE_bf7H_QJ-ZuJc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13979
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9208607
crossref_primary_10_1162_imag_a_00304
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00371_022_02657_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2022_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16676
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210038
crossref_primary_10_6009_jjrt_2020_JSRT_76_11_1133
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_15982
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2022_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2024_3459943
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_887634
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_inffus_2020_09_006
crossref_primary_10_33851_JMIS_2024_11_2_157
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_phro_2025_100736
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218001422400018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_09_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_f13122170
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_021_00630_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2022_10_029
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm12030480
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_91467_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2021_104806
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_109242
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compmedimag_2023_102241
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2023_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNNLS_2022_3169569
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10489_024_05785_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ceh_2022_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13668
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2022_08_004
crossref_primary_10_24835_1607_0763_1500
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_31060
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07156_2
crossref_primary_10_32604_csse_2024_053997
crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_15328
crossref_primary_10_3390_app11188335
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1169922
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12010183
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_future_2023_03_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10020181
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_025_01458_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15061750
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_021_00703_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46433_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_app12073223
Cites_doi 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.063
10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.010
10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.034
10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
10.1002/mp.12197
10.1186/1748-717X-8-154
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.006
10.1002/mp.12480
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091
10.1002/mp.13458
10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
10.1002/mp.13141
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2020
The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press
The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2020
– notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press
– notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID TOX
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
HCIFZ
K9.
M0S
P5Z
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1093/jrr/rrz086
DatabaseName Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

MEDLINE


Publicly Available Content Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: TOX
  name: Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
  url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 4
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Biology
EISSN 1349-9157
EndPage 264
ExternalDocumentID PMC7246058
A622268760
32043528
10_1093_jrr_rrz086
10.1093/jrr/rrz086
Genre Evaluation Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Japan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Japan
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.I3
0R~
29L
2WC
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
AAFWJ
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPPN
AAPXW
AAVAP
AAWTL
ABAZT
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABWST
ABXVV
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADHZD
ADMLS
AENEX
AENZO
AFFNX
AFPKN
AGQXC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
AMNDL
AOIJS
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCNDV
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
BTTYL
CIDKT
CS3
DIK
DU5
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
ITC
JAVBF
JMI
JSF
JSH
KSI
M48
ML0
M~E
O9-
OAWHX
OCL
OJQWA
OK1
O~Y
P2P
PEELM
RHF
RNS
ROL
ROX
RPM
RXO
TOX
TR2
W2D
XSB
~D7
7X7
8AO
8FI
8FJ
AAYXX
ABUWG
ABVLG
AFKRA
ARAPS
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
CITATION
FYUFA
HCIFZ
HMCUK
OVT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
UKHRP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FE
8FG
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
P62
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-8b0aefadf06e9960ed333dd89d297cdbce0f275c1c21ef9b82ca0c2b94c5abe43
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 0449-3060
1349-9157
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:09:05 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:10:23 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 23:42:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:37:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:20:22 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:30:00 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:33:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:55:38 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 05 08:34:57 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords lung cancer
semantic segmentation
trachea
main bronchi
U-Net
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c593t-8b0aefadf06e9960ed333dd89d297cdbce0f275c1c21ef9b82ca0c2b94c5abe43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1093/jrr/rrz086
PMID 32043528
PQID 3171180070
PQPubID 1976363
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7246058
proquest_miscellaneous_2353582688
proquest_journals_3171180070
gale_infotracmisc_A622268760
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A622268760
pubmed_primary_32043528
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jrr_rrz086
crossref_primary_10_1093_jrr_rrz086
oup_primary_10_1093_jrr_rrz086
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-03-23
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-03-23
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-03-23
  day: 23
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Journal of radiation research
PublicationTitleAlternate J Radiat Res
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References Network NCC (2020052419000576100_ref3)
Clark (2020052419000576100_ref18) 2013; 26
Zhou (2020052419000576100_ref15) 2017; 44
Park (2020052419000576100_ref16) 2019
Kong (2020052419000576100_ref11)
Marks (2020052419000576100_ref5) 2010; 76
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2020052419000576100_ref1)
Ronneberger (2020052419000576100_ref13) 2015; 9351
Kanda (2020052419000576100_ref19) 2013; 48
Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research (2020052419000576100_ref2)
Hong (2020052419000576100_ref6) 2012; 103
Dong (2020052419000576100_ref17) 2019; 46
Antonia (2020052419000576100_ref4) 2017; 377
van der Veen (2020052419000576100_ref12) 2019; 138
Yang (2020052419000576100_ref14) 2018; 45
Li (2020052419000576100_ref7) 2009; 73
Young (2020052419000576100_ref8) 2011 1; 79
Yamamoto (2020052419000576100_ref21) 2016; 118
Daisne (2020052419000576100_ref9) 2013 26; 8
Raudaschl (2020052419000576100_ref10) 2017; 44
Phillip (2020052419000576100_ref20) 2016
References_xml – volume: 48
  start-page: 452
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref19
  article-title: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics
  publication-title: Bone Marrow Transplant.
  doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244
– volume: 79
  start-page: 943
  issue: 3
  year: 2011 1
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref8
  article-title: Atlas-based segmentation improves consistency and decreases time required for contouring postoperative endometrial cancer nodal volumes
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.063
– ident: 2020052419000576100_ref11
  article-title: Atlases for organs at risk (OARs) in thoracic radiation therapy
– volume: 138
  start-page: 68
  year: 2019
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref12
  article-title: Benefits of deep learning for delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.010
– volume: 103
  start-page: 92
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref6
  article-title: Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010
– volume: 73
  start-page: 944
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref7
  article-title: Radiation therapy oncology group multi-institutional and multiobserver study: Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: An RTOG multi-institutional and multiobserver study
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.034
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1045
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref18
  article-title: The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): Maintaining and operating a public information repository
  publication-title: J Digit Imaging.
  doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
– ident: 2020052419000576100_ref1
  article-title: Globocan 2018
– ident: 2020052419000576100_ref3
  article-title: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Non-small cell lung cancer v. 2
– ident: 2020052419000576100_ref2
  article-title: Cancer statistics in Japan - 2018
– volume: 44
  start-page: 2020
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref10
  article-title: Evaluation of segmentation methods on head and neck CT: Auto-segmentation challenge 2015
  publication-title: Med Phys.
  doi: 10.1002/mp.12197
– volume: 8
  start-page: 154
  year: 2013 26
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref9
  article-title: Atlas-based automatic segmentation of head and neck organs at risk and nodal target volumes: A clinical validation
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol.
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-154
– volume: 118
  start-page: 227
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref21
  article-title: The first patient treatment of computed tomography ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy for lung cancer
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.006
– volume: 44
  start-page: 5221
  issue: 10
  year: 2017
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref15
  article-title: Deep learning of the sectional appearances of 3D CT images for anatomical structure segmentation based on an FCN voting method
  publication-title: Med Phys.
  doi: 10.1002/mp.12480
– year: 2019
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref16
  article-title: Fully automated lung lobe segmentation in volumetric chest CT with 3D U-net: Validation with intra- and extra-datasets
  publication-title: J Digit Imaging
– year: 2016
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref20
  article-title: Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks
– volume: 76
  start-page: S70
  issue: 3 Suppl
  year: 2010
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref5
  article-title: Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091
– volume: 9351
  start-page: 234
  year: 2015
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref13
  article-title: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI), springer
  publication-title: LNCS
– volume: 46
  start-page: 2157
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref17
  article-title: Automatic multiorgan segmentation in thorax CT images using U-net-GAN
  publication-title: Med Phys.
  doi: 10.1002/mp.13458
– volume: 377
  start-page: 1919
  issue: 20
  year: 2017
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref4
  article-title: Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med.
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
– volume: 45
  start-page: 4568
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  ident: 2020052419000576100_ref14
  article-title: Autosegmentation for thoracic radiation treatment planning: A grand challenge at AAPM 2017
  publication-title: Med Phys.
  doi: 10.1002/mp.13141
SSID ssj0027050
Score 2.4661307
Snippet This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a...
ABSTRACTThis study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
oup
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 257
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Bronchi
Bronchi - diagnostic imaging
Cancer research
Care and treatment
CAT scans
Computed tomography
Contouring
Deep learning
Digital imaging
Durvalumab
Effectiveness
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Image segmentation
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Lung cancer
Machine learning
Medical imaging
Medical imaging equipment
Methods
Non-small cell lung cancer
Radiation
Radiation (Physics)
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Rank tests
Regular Paper
Semantic segmentation
Semantics
Test sets
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Trachea
Trachea - diagnostic imaging
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  dbid: 8FG
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9QwDI9gCMQLgvF1cExBICEkossl_XxCE9sxIW1PnLS3Kknd7dBdb2t70sb_wP-M3eY-itDeKjlK0tqx3dj-mbGPEEMUpBAJtA1SBKFJhbFFIqSNpTQaQLYtWU7PopNp8OM8PPcXbrVPq1zrxFZR50tHd-QjtHOEVoYS-vXqWlDXKIqu-hYa99mDMVoaSulKJt-3P1yy7dAqg4Di-5Fcw5OmevSrqkZV9VtSDfWOQfJquVfrtuNy_ps5uWOKJk_ZE-9D8sOO6c_YPSj32cOuq-TtPnt06uPlz9mfY0KIMO6Wb1G9-bLg6ugL10d8Ks6g4TUs8PPOHD5cLHwpUslNmXPToG8tyNDlfSJOUZKzO-dzVBY1hxs3X5EV5OhPctwzioJpp1iYWclttSzd5ewFm06Of347Eb4Bg3BhqhuRWGmgMHkhIyAUF8i11nmepLlKY5dbB7JQcejGTo2hSG2inJFO2TRwobEQ6Jdsr1yW8JpxMGYcAoEXFjZAl8MGeaogjW0iizAu9IB9XnMhcx6dnJpkzLMuSq4z5FjWcWzAPmzGXnWYHP8d9YmYmdFBpfc2vt4A90OQV9lhhK5RhMZADtiwNxIPmOuRD1Ac7lxpuJaUzGuAOtvK64C935BpaspqK2G5qjOlQypUjpJkwF51grVZRlPRcqiQEvdEbjOAcMH7lHJ22eKDx6oNdr-5e1tv2WNFdwdSC6WHbK-pVvAOHazGHrSn6C_r3Ch_
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171180070
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2353582688
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7246058
Volume 61
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1tb9MwED7tRaB9QTDeCiUyAgkhEebacZx8QGiwlgmpBaFV6rfIdhzWKU0hbaWV_8B_5pyk3YImxJco0jl24jv7Hse-5wBeWmnDILahj76B-oFQsa90FvlUS0oVt5ZWKVmGo_B0HHyeiMkObPJ3Nh24uHFp5_JJjcv87eXP9Xsc8O8aMqSji7I8KstfCM53YR89knSZDIZBdLXwoqKOFg5iHNxCbmhKW8-2HFMzPbdi3q5Bz79PUF5zSYO7cKfBkuS4Vv492LHFIdyqs0uuD-H2sNk3vw-_-44pQpk1uWL3JvOMsJM3hJ-QsT-yS7KwM-zmqcGb77MmJKkgqkiJWiLG9p3DS9tCrKJwoDcnOU4aC2IvTb5y3pAgriT4zmgSqqpipqYF0eW8MOfTBzAe9M8-nvpNIgbfiJgv_UhTZTOVZjS0js3FppzzNI3ilMXSpNpYmjEpTM-wns1iHTGjqGE6DoxQ2gb8IewV88I-BmKV6gnrSAwzHSD00EEaMxtLHdFMyIx34PVGC4lpWMpdsow8qXfLeYIaS2qNdeDFtuyPmpvjxlKvnDITZ0Luu1UTd4Dv46ivkuMQIVKIToF2oNsqiQPNtMQemsM_W-puLCXZGHKC-Myx7OHM2oHnW7Gr2p1uK-x8tUgYFy5gOYyiDjyqDWvbDHfBy4KhRLZMblvA8YO3JcX0vOIJl6za9H7yH-0-hQPmfiRQ7jPehb1lubLPEG0ttQe7ciLxGg0-ebD_oT_6-s2r_lx41SDD69mXyR85jDMF
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKEY8LgvIKhGIECCFhxbH3eUCoIg0pbXJqpN4W2-ulQclu2SSC8B_4K_xGZvaRZBHqrbeVxrK9mvF848d8Q8gr61vPCa3HABs4c1wVMqWTgHHtc66ktbwoyTIceYOx8_nMPdshf-pcGHxWWfvEwlHHmcEz8g7gHLKVgYV-uPjOsGoU3q7WJTRKszi2qx-wZZu_P-qBfl8L0T88_ThgVVUBZtxQLligubKJihPuWaQmsbGUMo6DMBahb2JtLE-E75quEV2bhDoQRnEjdOgYV2nrSOj3GrnuSEByzEzvf9ps8HhREZY7Dr4n8HhNhxrKzrc87-T5L44521sAWMFAI7duK8T996XmFvT175I7VcxKD0oju0d2bLpHbpRVLFd75Oawup-_T34fIiOFMiu6YRGnWUJF7x2VPTpmI7ugczsDdU4MfHydValPKVVpTNUCYnmGwBo3hdBFisH1lE7BOc2p_WmmS0RdCvErhTmD6amii5mapFTnWWrOJw_I-EpU85DspllqHxNqleq6FskSE-1AiKOdOBQ29HXAE9dPZIu8rbUQmYoNHYtyTKPyVl5GoLGo1FiLvFy3vSg5QP7b6g0qM0LHgP-tqvwGmA9SbEUHHoRiHoAPb5F2oyUsaNMQ74M5XDpSu7aUqPI482izPlrkxVqMXeMrutRmy3kkpIuJ0V4QtMij0rDWw0hMknYFSPyGya0bIA95U5JOzgs-cl8Ul-tPLp_Wc3JrcDo8iU6ORsdPyW2B5xZcMiHbZHeRL-0zCO4Wer9YUZR8ueol_BfEgWgr
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+evaluation+of+2D%2C+3D+U-Net+semantic+segmentation+and+atlas-based+segmentation+of+normal+lungs+excluding+the+trachea+and+main+bronchi&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+radiation+research&rft.au=Nemoto%2C+Takafumi&rft.au=Futakami%2C+Natsumi&rft.au=Yagi%2C+Masamichi&rft.au=Kumabe%2C+Atsuhiro&rft.date=2020-03-23&rft.issn=1349-9157&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjrr%2Frrz086&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon