Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-s...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of radiation research Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 257 - 264 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
23.03.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers.This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 * 128 * 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation [R] Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined . The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation Ⓡ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. ABSTRACTThis study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 × 128 × 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart SegmentationⓇ Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960–0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989–0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a commercially dominant auto-segmentation tool with regards to delineating normal lung excluding the trachea and main bronchi. A total of 232 non-small-cell lung cancer cases were examined. The computed tomography (CT) images of these cases were converted from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Therapy (RT) formats to arrays of 32 * 128 * 128 voxels and input into both 2D and 3D U-Net, which are deep learning networks for semantic segmentation. The number of training, validation and test sets were 160, 40 and 32, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the test set were evaluated employing Smart Segmentation [R] Knowledge Based Contouring (Smart segmentation is an atlas-based segmentation tool), as well as the 2D and 3D U-Net. The mean DSCs of the test set were 0.964 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.960-0.968], 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.992) and 0.990 (95% CI, 0.989-0.991) with Smart segmentation, 2D and 3D U-Net, respectively. Compared with Smart segmentation, both U-Nets presented significantly higher DSCs by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01). There was no difference in mean DSC between the 2D and 3D U-Net systems. The newly-devised 2D and 3D U-Net approaches were found to be more effective than a commercial auto-segmentation tool. Even the relatively shallow 2D U-Net which does not require high-performance computational resources was effective enough for the lung segmentation. Semantic segmentation using deep learning was useful in radiation treatment planning for lung cancers. Keywords: semantic segmentation; U-Net; lung cancer; trachea; main bronchi |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Nemoto, Takafumi Yagi, Masamichi Takeda, Atsuya Kumabe, Atsuhiro Kunieda, Etsuo Shigematsu, Naoyuki Futakami, Natsumi |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Division of Radiation Oncology , Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan 5 Radiation Oncology Center , Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan 3 Department of Radiology , Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan 2 Department of Radiation Oncology , Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan 4 HPC&AI Business Dept. , Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 5 Radiation Oncology Center , Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan – name: 1 Division of Radiation Oncology , Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan – name: 2 Department of Radiation Oncology , Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan – name: 4 HPC&AI Business Dept. , Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan – name: 3 Department of Radiology , Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Takafumi surname: Nemoto fullname: Nemoto, Takafumi email: takatohoku@gmail.com organization: Division of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu-Hospital, Shimosueyoshi 3-6-1, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan – sequence: 2 givenname: Natsumi surname: Futakami fullname: Futakami, Natsumi organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan – sequence: 3 givenname: Masamichi surname: Yagi fullname: Yagi, Masamichi organization: HPC&AI Business Dept., Platform Technical Engineer Div., System Platform Solution Unit, Fujitsu Limited, World Trade Center Building, 4-1, Hamamatsucho 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-6125, Japan – sequence: 4 givenname: Atsuhiro surname: Kumabe fullname: Kumabe, Atsuhiro organization: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan – sequence: 5 givenname: Atsuya surname: Takeda fullname: Takeda, Atsuya organization: Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, 247-0056, Japan – sequence: 6 givenname: Etsuo surname: Kunieda fullname: Kunieda, Etsuo organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara-shi, Kanagawa, 259-1143, Japan – sequence: 7 givenname: Naoyuki surname: Shigematsu fullname: Shigematsu, Naoyuki organization: Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kl1rFDEUhoNU7LZ64w-QgAhFnPZMMp83QmnrBxS9sdchk5zZzZJJ1mSmWP9D_7NZp1W3FMlFQvKch5zkPSB7zjsk5GUOxzm0_GQdwkkIP6GpnpBFzos2a_Oy3iMLKNKaQwX75CDGNQCroYRnZJ8zKHjJmgW5veh7o6S6oXgt7SRH4x31PWXn7yg_p1fZFxxpxEG60ai0WA7oxpmSTlM5WhmzTkbUu4dJ4XwYpKV2cstI8YeykzZuSccV0jFItUL5WzFI42gXvFMr85w87aWN-OJuPiRXHy6-nX3KLr9-_Hx2epmpsuVj1nQgsZe6hwrbtgLUnHOtm1aztla6Uwg9q0uVK5Zj33YNUxIU69pClbLDgh-S97N3M3UDapWuHaQVm2AGGW6El0bsnjizEkt_LWpWVFA2SXB0Jwj--4RxFIOJCq2VDv0UBeMlLxtWNVv09QN07afgUnuC53WeNwA1_KWW0qIwrvfbN9pKxWnFWDLV1ZY6foRKQ-NgVEpFb9L-TsGrfxv90-F9ABIAM6CCjzFgL5SZvzCZjRU5iG3GRMqYmDOWSt4-KLm3Pgq_mWE_bf7H_QJ-ZuJc |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13979 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9208607 crossref_primary_10_1162_imag_a_00304 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00371_022_02657_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2022_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16676 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20210038 crossref_primary_10_6009_jjrt_2020_JSRT_76_11_1133 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_15982 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2022_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2024_3459943 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_887634 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_inffus_2020_09_006 crossref_primary_10_33851_JMIS_2024_11_2_157 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_phro_2025_100736 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218001422400018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_09_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_f13122170 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12194_021_00630_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2022_10_029 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm12030480 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_91467_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2021_104806 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_109242 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compmedimag_2023_102241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isprsjprs_2023_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNNLS_2022_3169569 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10489_024_05785_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ceh_2022_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13668 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2022_08_004 crossref_primary_10_24835_1607_0763_1500 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_31060 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_07156_2 crossref_primary_10_32604_csse_2024_053997 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_15328 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11188335 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1169922 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12010183 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_future_2023_03_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10020181 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_025_01458_x crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15061750 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12880_021_00703_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46433_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12073223 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.063 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.010 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.034 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 10.1002/mp.12197 10.1186/1748-717X-8-154 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.006 10.1002/mp.12480 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091 10.1002/mp.13458 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937 10.1002/mp.13141 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. 2020 – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | TOX AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH HCIFZ K9. M0S P5Z P62 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1093/jrr/rrz086 |
DatabaseName | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Technology Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: TOX name: Oxford Journals Open Access Collection url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Biology |
EISSN | 1349-9157 |
EndPage | 264 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC7246058 A622268760 32043528 10_1093_jrr_rrz086 10.1093/jrr/rrz086 |
Genre | Evaluation Study Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Japan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Japan |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .I3 0R~ 29L 2WC 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS AAFWJ AAMVS AAOGV AAPPN AAPXW AAVAP AAWTL ABAZT ABEJV ABGNP ABPTD ABQLI ABWST ABXVV ACGFS ADBBV ADHZD ADMLS AENEX AENZO AFFNX AFPKN AGQXC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQC AMNDL AOIJS BAWUL BAYMD BCNDV BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ BTTYL CIDKT CS3 DIK DU5 D~K E3Z EBS EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HYE IAO IHR INH ITC JAVBF JMI JSF JSH KSI M48 ML0 M~E O9- OAWHX OCL OJQWA OK1 O~Y P2P PEELM RHF RNS ROL ROX RPM RXO TOX TR2 W2D XSB ~D7 7X7 8AO 8FI 8FJ AAYXX ABUWG ABVLG AFKRA ARAPS BENPR BGLVJ CCPQU CITATION FYUFA HCIFZ HMCUK OVT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FE 8FG 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. P62 PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-8b0aefadf06e9960ed333dd89d297cdbce0f275c1c21ef9b82ca0c2b94c5abe43 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 0449-3060 1349-9157 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:09:05 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:10:23 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 23:42:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:37:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:20:22 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:30:00 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:33:52 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:38 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 05 08:34:57 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | lung cancer semantic segmentation trachea main bronchi U-Net |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c593t-8b0aefadf06e9960ed333dd89d297cdbce0f275c1c21ef9b82ca0c2b94c5abe43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1093/jrr/rrz086 |
PMID | 32043528 |
PQID | 3171180070 |
PQPubID | 1976363 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7246058 proquest_miscellaneous_2353582688 proquest_journals_3171180070 gale_infotracmisc_A622268760 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A622268760 pubmed_primary_32043528 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jrr_rrz086 crossref_primary_10_1093_jrr_rrz086 oup_primary_10_1093_jrr_rrz086 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-03-23 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-03-23 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2020 text: 2020-03-23 day: 23 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Journal of radiation research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Radiat Res |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press |
References | Network NCC (2020052419000576100_ref3) Clark (2020052419000576100_ref18) 2013; 26 Zhou (2020052419000576100_ref15) 2017; 44 Park (2020052419000576100_ref16) 2019 Kong (2020052419000576100_ref11) Marks (2020052419000576100_ref5) 2010; 76 International Agency for Research on Cancer (2020052419000576100_ref1) Ronneberger (2020052419000576100_ref13) 2015; 9351 Kanda (2020052419000576100_ref19) 2013; 48 Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research (2020052419000576100_ref2) Hong (2020052419000576100_ref6) 2012; 103 Dong (2020052419000576100_ref17) 2019; 46 Antonia (2020052419000576100_ref4) 2017; 377 van der Veen (2020052419000576100_ref12) 2019; 138 Yang (2020052419000576100_ref14) 2018; 45 Li (2020052419000576100_ref7) 2009; 73 Young (2020052419000576100_ref8) 2011 1; 79 Yamamoto (2020052419000576100_ref21) 2016; 118 Daisne (2020052419000576100_ref9) 2013 26; 8 Raudaschl (2020052419000576100_ref10) 2017; 44 Phillip (2020052419000576100_ref20) 2016 |
References_xml | – volume: 48 start-page: 452 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref19 article-title: Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics publication-title: Bone Marrow Transplant. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 – volume: 79 start-page: 943 issue: 3 year: 2011 1 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref8 article-title: Atlas-based segmentation improves consistency and decreases time required for contouring postoperative endometrial cancer nodal volumes publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.063 – ident: 2020052419000576100_ref11 article-title: Atlases for organs at risk (OARs) in thoracic radiation therapy – volume: 138 start-page: 68 year: 2019 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref12 article-title: Benefits of deep learning for delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer publication-title: Radiother Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.010 – volume: 103 start-page: 92 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref6 article-title: Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice publication-title: Radiother Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.02.010 – volume: 73 start-page: 944 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref7 article-title: Radiation therapy oncology group multi-institutional and multiobserver study: Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: An RTOG multi-institutional and multiobserver study publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.034 – volume: 26 start-page: 1045 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref18 article-title: The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): Maintaining and operating a public information repository publication-title: J Digit Imaging. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 – ident: 2020052419000576100_ref1 article-title: Globocan 2018 – ident: 2020052419000576100_ref3 article-title: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Non-small cell lung cancer v. 2 – ident: 2020052419000576100_ref2 article-title: Cancer statistics in Japan - 2018 – volume: 44 start-page: 2020 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref10 article-title: Evaluation of segmentation methods on head and neck CT: Auto-segmentation challenge 2015 publication-title: Med Phys. doi: 10.1002/mp.12197 – volume: 8 start-page: 154 year: 2013 26 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref9 article-title: Atlas-based automatic segmentation of head and neck organs at risk and nodal target volumes: A clinical validation publication-title: Radiat Oncol. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-154 – volume: 118 start-page: 227 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref21 article-title: The first patient treatment of computed tomography ventilation functional image-guided radiotherapy for lung cancer publication-title: Radiother Oncol. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.006 – volume: 44 start-page: 5221 issue: 10 year: 2017 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref15 article-title: Deep learning of the sectional appearances of 3D CT images for anatomical structure segmentation based on an FCN voting method publication-title: Med Phys. doi: 10.1002/mp.12480 – year: 2019 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref16 article-title: Fully automated lung lobe segmentation in volumetric chest CT with 3D U-net: Validation with intra- and extra-datasets publication-title: J Digit Imaging – year: 2016 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref20 article-title: Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks – volume: 76 start-page: S70 issue: 3 Suppl year: 2010 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref5 article-title: Radiation dose-volume effects in the lung publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.091 – volume: 9351 start-page: 234 year: 2015 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref13 article-title: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI), springer publication-title: LNCS – volume: 46 start-page: 2157 issue: 5 year: 2019 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref17 article-title: Automatic multiorgan segmentation in thorax CT images using U-net-GAN publication-title: Med Phys. doi: 10.1002/mp.13458 – volume: 377 start-page: 1919 issue: 20 year: 2017 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref4 article-title: Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937 – volume: 45 start-page: 4568 issue: 10 year: 2018 ident: 2020052419000576100_ref14 article-title: Autosegmentation for thoracic radiation treatment planning: A grand challenge at AAPM 2017 publication-title: Med Phys. doi: 10.1002/mp.13141 |
SSID | ssj0027050 |
Score | 2.4661307 |
Snippet | This study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective than a... ABSTRACTThis study aimed to examine the efficacy of semantic segmentation implemented by deep learning and to confirm whether this method is more effective... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref oup |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 257 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms Bronchi Bronchi - diagnostic imaging Cancer research Care and treatment CAT scans Computed tomography Contouring Deep learning Digital imaging Durvalumab Effectiveness Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Image segmentation Imaging, Three-Dimensional Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung cancer Machine learning Medical imaging Medical imaging equipment Methods Non-small cell lung cancer Radiation Radiation (Physics) Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Rank tests Regular Paper Semantic segmentation Semantics Test sets Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Trachea Trachea - diagnostic imaging |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9QwDI9gCMQLgvF1cExBICEkossl_XxCE9sxIW1PnLS3Kknd7dBdb2t70sb_wP-M3eY-itDeKjlK0tqx3dj-mbGPEEMUpBAJtA1SBKFJhbFFIqSNpTQaQLYtWU7PopNp8OM8PPcXbrVPq1zrxFZR50tHd-QjtHOEVoYS-vXqWlDXKIqu-hYa99mDMVoaSulKJt-3P1yy7dAqg4Di-5Fcw5OmevSrqkZV9VtSDfWOQfJquVfrtuNy_ps5uWOKJk_ZE-9D8sOO6c_YPSj32cOuq-TtPnt06uPlz9mfY0KIMO6Wb1G9-bLg6ugL10d8Ks6g4TUs8PPOHD5cLHwpUslNmXPToG8tyNDlfSJOUZKzO-dzVBY1hxs3X5EV5OhPctwzioJpp1iYWclttSzd5ewFm06Of347Eb4Bg3BhqhuRWGmgMHkhIyAUF8i11nmepLlKY5dbB7JQcejGTo2hSG2inJFO2TRwobEQ6Jdsr1yW8JpxMGYcAoEXFjZAl8MGeaogjW0iizAu9IB9XnMhcx6dnJpkzLMuSq4z5FjWcWzAPmzGXnWYHP8d9YmYmdFBpfc2vt4A90OQV9lhhK5RhMZADtiwNxIPmOuRD1Ac7lxpuJaUzGuAOtvK64C935BpaspqK2G5qjOlQypUjpJkwF51grVZRlPRcqiQEvdEbjOAcMH7lHJ22eKDx6oNdr-5e1tv2WNFdwdSC6WHbK-pVvAOHazGHrSn6C_r3Ch_ priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Efficacy evaluation of 2D, 3D U-Net semantic segmentation and atlas-based segmentation of normal lungs excluding the trachea and main bronchi |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043528 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171180070 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2353582688 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7246058 |
Volume | 61 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1tb9MwED7tRaB9QTDeCiUyAgkhEebacZx8QGiwlgmpBaFV6rfIdhzWKU0hbaWV_8B_5pyk3YImxJco0jl24jv7Hse-5wBeWmnDILahj76B-oFQsa90FvlUS0oVt5ZWKVmGo_B0HHyeiMkObPJ3Nh24uHFp5_JJjcv87eXP9Xsc8O8aMqSji7I8KstfCM53YR89knSZDIZBdLXwoqKOFg5iHNxCbmhKW8-2HFMzPbdi3q5Bz79PUF5zSYO7cKfBkuS4Vv492LHFIdyqs0uuD-H2sNk3vw-_-44pQpk1uWL3JvOMsJM3hJ-QsT-yS7KwM-zmqcGb77MmJKkgqkiJWiLG9p3DS9tCrKJwoDcnOU4aC2IvTb5y3pAgriT4zmgSqqpipqYF0eW8MOfTBzAe9M8-nvpNIgbfiJgv_UhTZTOVZjS0js3FppzzNI3ilMXSpNpYmjEpTM-wns1iHTGjqGE6DoxQ2gb8IewV88I-BmKV6gnrSAwzHSD00EEaMxtLHdFMyIx34PVGC4lpWMpdsow8qXfLeYIaS2qNdeDFtuyPmpvjxlKvnDITZ0Luu1UTd4Dv46ivkuMQIVKIToF2oNsqiQPNtMQemsM_W-puLCXZGHKC-Myx7OHM2oHnW7Gr2p1uK-x8tUgYFy5gOYyiDjyqDWvbDHfBy4KhRLZMblvA8YO3JcX0vOIJl6za9H7yH-0-hQPmfiRQ7jPehb1lubLPEG0ttQe7ciLxGg0-ebD_oT_6-s2r_lx41SDD69mXyR85jDMF |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELZKEY8LgvIKhGIECCFhxbH3eUCoIg0pbXJqpN4W2-ulQclu2SSC8B_4K_xGZvaRZBHqrbeVxrK9mvF848d8Q8gr61vPCa3HABs4c1wVMqWTgHHtc66ktbwoyTIceYOx8_nMPdshf-pcGHxWWfvEwlHHmcEz8g7gHLKVgYV-uPjOsGoU3q7WJTRKszi2qx-wZZu_P-qBfl8L0T88_ThgVVUBZtxQLligubKJihPuWaQmsbGUMo6DMBahb2JtLE-E75quEV2bhDoQRnEjdOgYV2nrSOj3GrnuSEByzEzvf9ps8HhREZY7Dr4n8HhNhxrKzrc87-T5L44521sAWMFAI7duK8T996XmFvT175I7VcxKD0oju0d2bLpHbpRVLFd75Oawup-_T34fIiOFMiu6YRGnWUJF7x2VPTpmI7ugczsDdU4MfHydValPKVVpTNUCYnmGwBo3hdBFisH1lE7BOc2p_WmmS0RdCvErhTmD6amii5mapFTnWWrOJw_I-EpU85DspllqHxNqleq6FskSE-1AiKOdOBQ29HXAE9dPZIu8rbUQmYoNHYtyTKPyVl5GoLGo1FiLvFy3vSg5QP7b6g0qM0LHgP-tqvwGmA9SbEUHHoRiHoAPb5F2oyUsaNMQ74M5XDpSu7aUqPI482izPlrkxVqMXeMrutRmy3kkpIuJ0V4QtMij0rDWw0hMknYFSPyGya0bIA95U5JOzgs-cl8Ul-tPLp_Wc3JrcDo8iU6ORsdPyW2B5xZcMiHbZHeRL-0zCO4Wer9YUZR8ueol_BfEgWgr |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+evaluation+of+2D%2C+3D+U-Net+semantic+segmentation+and+atlas-based+segmentation+of+normal+lungs+excluding+the+trachea+and+main+bronchi&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+radiation+research&rft.au=Nemoto%2C+Takafumi&rft.au=Futakami%2C+Natsumi&rft.au=Yagi%2C+Masamichi&rft.au=Kumabe%2C+Atsuhiro&rft.date=2020-03-23&rft.issn=1349-9157&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjrr%2Frrz086&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0449-3060&client=summon |