A Review of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Australia and New Zealand, 2005 to 2013

Abstract This report describes hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity and outcome in Australia and New Zealand during the years 2005 to 2013. In 2013, 1018 autologous, 221 allogeneic with related donors, and 264 allogeneic with unrelated donors HCT were performed in 40 centers in Australi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiology of blood and marrow transplantation Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 284 - 291
Main Authors Nivison-Smith, Ian, Bardy, Peter, Dodds, Anthony J, Ma, David D.F, Aarons, Donna, Tran, Steven, Wilcox, Leonie, Szer, Jeff
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract This report describes hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity and outcome in Australia and New Zealand during the years 2005 to 2013. In 2013, 1018 autologous, 221 allogeneic with related donors, and 264 allogeneic with unrelated donors HCT were performed in 40 centers in Australia, with corresponding figures of 147, 39, and 47 in 6 centers in New Zealand. Annual numbers of HCT in 2013 increased, compared to 2005, by 25% in Australia and by 52% in New Zealand. The majority of both allogeneic and autologous HCT used peripheral blood as the stem cell source for all years studied. Major indications for transplantation were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), plasma cell disorders, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival probabilities at 5 years after transplantation for adult (16+) allogeneic first HCT recipients were 54.2% for ALL, 46.0% for AML, 48.4% for myelodysplastic syndromes, and 58.6% for NHL. Consistent patterns over time include a steady increase in HCT, particularly for older recipients, relatively constant numbers of allografts using cord blood, and a recent increase in the number of allografts with 2 or more HLA-mismatched related donors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1083-8791
1523-6536
DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.009