Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers
Background Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation re...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical orthopaedics and related research Vol. 474; no. 1; pp. 120 - 125 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.01.2016
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication.
Questions/purposes
The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.
Methods
Between 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0–9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42–89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology.
Results
Postoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°–139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup.
Conclusions
Our two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, therapeutic study. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BACKGROUNDTwo-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication.QUESTIONS/PURPOSESThe purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.METHODSBetween 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0-9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42-89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology.RESULTSPostoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°-139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup.CONCLUSIONSOur two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel IV, therapeutic study. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Between 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0-9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42-89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology. Postoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°-139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup. Our two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer. Level IV, therapeutic study. Background Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication. Questions/purposes The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Methods Between 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0–9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42–89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology. Results Postoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°–139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup. Conclusions Our two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. Background Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether this should be performed with a static antibiotic spacer or an articulating one that allows range of motion before reimplantation remains controversial. It is unclear if the advantages of articulating spacers (easier surgical exposure during reimplantation and improved postoperative flexion) outweigh the disadvantages of increased cost and complexity in the setting of similar rates of infection eradication. Questions/purposes The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the ultimate range of motion; and (2) to determine the proportion of patients who remained free of infection at a minimum 2 years after treatment with static antibiotic spacers as part of a two-stage revision TKA for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Methods Between 1999 and 2011, we treated 121 patients with chronically infected TKAs, of whom three had medical comorbidities precluding a two-stage exchange, four had died before 2-year followup for reasons other than the surgical intervention, and seven were lost to followup. The remaining 107 patients (109 knees; 53 men and 54 women) were treated using a two-stage approach with static spacers and are evaluated here at a mean of 3.7 years (range, 2.0-9.8 years); no patients were treated with articulating spacers during this study period. Twenty-five percent (27 of 109) of the organisms isolated the first-stage procedure were resistant to methicillin and/or vancomycin. Median age at the time of reimplantation was 67 years (range, 42-89 years). Range of motion was measured by an independent physical therapist with a standard goniometer. Knee Society knee and function scores were calculated before the first stage and at the 2-year mark. Because many of these patients were treated before consensus definitions of infection were established, we made the diagnosis of infection (and established that a patient was believed to be free of infection) using the approaches prevalent at that time, which generally included presence of a sinus tract communicating directly with the implant, two positive tissue cultures, or a combination of cultures, fluid analysis, and serology. Results Postoperatively, 67 knees had full extension and no patients had a flexion contracture > 10°. Median flexion was 100° (range, 60°-139°). Thirty-nine knees had postoperative flexion > 120°. Ninety-four percent of patients were clinically free of infection at last followup. Conclusions Our two-stage exchange protocol with static spacers yielded comparable flexion and infection eradication when compared with other recent studies that have used articulating spacers. The large proportion of resistant organisms is alarming. Future multicenter studies should compare static with articulating spacers and should evaluate both cost and efficacy, because our study suggests that adequate range of motion can be achieved without the added cost of the articulating spacer. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. |
Author | Maloney, William J. Hedlund, Hakan Suh, Gina Goodman, Stuart B. Su, Sharlene Huddleston, James I. Lichstein, Paul |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Paul surname: Lichstein fullname: Lichstein, Paul organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Sharlene surname: Su fullname: Su, Sharlene organization: University of Maryland School of Medicine – sequence: 3 givenname: Hakan surname: Hedlund fullname: Hedlund, Hakan organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Karolinska Institute – sequence: 4 givenname: Gina surname: Suh fullname: Suh, Gina organization: Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center – sequence: 5 givenname: William J. surname: Maloney fullname: Maloney, William J. organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Stuart B. surname: Goodman fullname: Goodman, Stuart B. organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center – sequence: 7 givenname: James I. surname: Huddleston fullname: Huddleston, James I. email: jhuddleston@stanford.edu organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26280681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132764815$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNp1UV1vFCEUJabGbqs_wBdD4osvo1wYBngxMY0fjU1s0m3UJ8LO3Nml7sIKrI3_Xia7Nq2JDwQu95zD5ZwTchRiQEKeA3sNjKk3GcAY0zCQTdu2ouGPyAwk1w2A4EdkxhgzjeHw7Zic5HxTS9FK_oQc845r1mmYke_zhK5sMBQaR3qJyW9TzGWFxff0c0Ck52HEvvgY6FdfVtTR-W1scnFLpJcpltjHNb3OPizpVXET62rrekz5KXk8unXGZ4f9lFx_eD8_-9RcfPl4fvbuoumlYaXRXcec4wvjlOaSyQ4VB6PHxcANY66XTqCWKJQGPeKgBKJTCgWqdhiFM-KUmL1uvsXtbmG3yW9c-m2j8_UcB3u4_-GnZTPaao7qWg2yct_uuRWwwaGvNiS3fijxoBP8yi7jL9t2umsNrwKvDgIp_txhLnbjc4_rtQsYd9mCktBqpYSu0Jf_QG_iLoVqzYRiikHHoaJgj-prDDnheDcMMDuFbveh2xq6nUK30xAv7v_ijvE35QrgB4tqKywx3Xv6v6p_AFW9urg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_019_1520_3 crossref_primary_10_1097_MS9_0000000000000430 crossref_primary_10_1302_2046_3758_811_BJR_2018_0339_R3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_017_2630_1 crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOS_D_19_00332 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_17_00874 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_04293_4 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1729936 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10195_024_00750_w crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2337_2402 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules22071042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_018_3007_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2017_05_053 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12103600 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artd_2021_10_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artd_2022_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25570 crossref_primary_10_21823_2311_2905_2017_23_1_98_107 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_019_04296_z crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1729552 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_17_00421 crossref_primary_10_1302_2058_5241_4_190003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2019_03_053 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_117_205567 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11164854 crossref_primary_10_1302_2046_3758_811_BJR_2019_0339_R3 crossref_primary_10_21823_2311_2905_2019_25_4_109_116 crossref_primary_10_1097_BTO_0000000000000524 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_19_00519 crossref_primary_10_5194_jbji_8_175_2023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcot_2022_06_034 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43019_021_00112_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2020_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_017_2842_6 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_18_00356 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00590_020_02844_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_CORR_0000000000001206 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_20_00011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2021_01_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_otsr_2022_103453 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_20_01678 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11926_018_0742_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_BCO_0000000000000839 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jor_2020_12_021 crossref_primary_10_17816_2311_2905_1750 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artd_2019_02_005 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_RVW_21_00143 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2018_09_027 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_024_07259_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2020_01_080 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_023_05796_9 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.003 10.3109/17453674.2011.581266 10.2106/JBJS.L.01461 10.4103/0019-5413.87126 10.1007/s11999-009-1204-0 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.056 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.004 10.1007/s11999-011-2037-1 10.1007/s11999-010-1579-y 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.180 10.1097/01.blo.0000149241.77924.01 10.1007/s11999-014-3540-y 10.1007/s11999-012-2533-y 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 10.1001/2012.jama.11153 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.10486 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.026 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.023 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2015 The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2015 – notice: The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2016 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QP 7RV 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. KB0 M0S M1P NAPCQ PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS D8T ZZAVC |
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-015-4443-2 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SwePub Articles full text |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1528-1132 |
EndPage | 125 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_132764815 3901514781 10_1007_s11999_015_4443_2 26280681 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -Y2 -~C -~X .55 .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 08G 0R~ 0VY 199 1CY 1KJ 1N0 203 29B 29~ 2J2 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2WC 30V 354 3O- 3V. 4.4 408 40D 40E 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 67Z 6J9 6NX 6PF 78A 7O~ 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8F7 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AABHQ AAEJM AAGIX AAHPQ AAIAL AAJJC AAJKR AAMOA AANXM AAPBV AAQKA AAQQT AARTL AASCR AASXQ AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABASU ABDIG ABHLI ABJNI ABJOX ABMNI ABNWP ABPLI ABPPZ ABPTK ABTEG ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABUWZ ABVCZ ACBXY ACGFO ACGFS ACGUR ACHVE ACHXU ACIHN ACILI ACKNC ACNWC ACOAL ACPRK ACREN ACRZS ADBBV ADBIZ ADFPA ADGGA ADHIR ADHPY ADIYS ADKPE ADNKB ADQRH AE3 AEAQA AEBTG AEETU AEGNC AEJHL AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AEQTP AETLH AFDTB AFFNX AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFUWQ AFWTZ AFZKB AGJBK AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHMBA AHOMT AHRYX AHSBF AHVBC AHYZX AI. AIIXL AINUH AJBLW AJIOK AJJEV AJNWD AJRNO AKMHD AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX ALWAN AMJPA AMKLP AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOIJS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AWKKM AZFZN B-. BA0 BAWUL BENPR BGNMA BKEYQ BPHCQ BS7 BVXVI BYPQX C45 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DIK DIWNM DUNZO E3Z EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH ESBYG EX3 F5P FCALG FEDTE FIGPU FNLPD FRRFC FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GNXGY GQ6 GQ7 GQDEL GX1 H0~ HF~ HG5 HG6 HLICF HLJTE HMCUK HMJXF HRMNR HVGLF HYE HZ~ H~9 IKREB IKYAY ITM IXC IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z J5H JBSCW JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KMI KOV KPH L7B M18 M1P M4Y MA- N9A NAPCQ NU0 N~M O9- O93 O9I O9J OAG OAH OB4 OCUKA ODA OK1 OL1 OLB OLG OLH OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P P9S PF0 PONUX PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X QOR QOS R58 R89 R9I RIG RLZ ROL RPM RPX RRX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B S4R SAP SDH SHX SMD SNE SNX SOJ SZ9 SZN T13 T8P TEORI TR2 TSG TSK TSPGW TT1 TUC TWZ U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP VC2 VH1 VVN W48 WAF WH7 WK8 WOQ WOW X3V X3W X7M XXN XYM YCJ YFH YOC YQY YRY Z45 Z7U Z82 Z87 ZA5 ZB8 ZCG ZFV ZGI ZOVNA ZXP ZZMQN AAAAV AAIQE ACXJB AFBBN AHQNM AJZMW ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QP 7T5 7XB 8FK H94 K9. PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM ACLDA ADTPV AOWAS D8T ZZAVC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-8660aa2b9a7825056e72198fbd2900ac5a3e85e37818fed73eea77e3e74df3a93 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
IngestDate | Sun Oct 06 03:39:45 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:03:47 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 09:12:03 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 09:30:11 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:14:33 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:04:46 EDT 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:01:16 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Periprosthetic Joint Infection Infection Eradication Preoperative Median Knee Society Score Postoperative Flexion |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c590t-8660aa2b9a7825056e72198fbd2900ac5a3e85e37818fed73eea77e3e74df3a93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132764815 |
PMID | 26280681 |
PQID | 1750701621 |
PQPubID | 54045 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_132764815 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4686492 proquest_miscellaneous_1751487738 proquest_journals_1750701621 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11999_015_4443_2 pubmed_primary_26280681 springer_journals_10_1007_s11999_015_4443_2 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2016 text: 2016-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States – name: Park Ridge |
PublicationTitle | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Clin Orthop Relat Res |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Orthop Relat Res |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Springer US Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies |
References | Cram, Lu, Kates, Singh, Li, Wolf (CR6) 2012; 308 Hofmann, Goldberg, Tanner, Kurtin (CR11) 2005; 430 Kim, Bae, Cho, Lee, Sohn, Kim (CR15) 2013; 25 Parvizi, Gehrke (CR19) 2014; 29 Pivec, Naziri, Issa, Banerjee, Mont (CR20) 2014; 29 Chiang, Su, Chen, Chiu, Chen (CR3) 2011; 82 Haddad, Masri, Campbell, McGraw, Beauchamp, Duncan (CR10) 2000; 82 Citak, Argenson, Masri, Kendoff, Springer, Alt, Baldini, Cui, Deirmengian, del Sel, Harrer, Israelite, Jahoda, Jutte, Levicoff, Meani, Motta, Pena, Ranawat, Safir, Squire, Taunton, Vogely, Wellman (CR5) 2014; 32 Kalore, Maheshwari, Sharma, Cheng, Gioe (CR14) 2012; 470 Choi, Malchau, Bedair (CR4) 2012; 27 Matsuda, Kawahara, Okazaki, Tashiro, Iwamoto (CR18) 2013; 471 Hofmann, Kane, Tkach, Plaster, Camargo (CR12) 1995; 321 Le, Goodman, Maloney, Huddleston (CR17) 2014; 472 Cuckler (CR7) 2005; 20 Kurtz, Ong, Lau, Mowat, Halpern (CR16) 2007; 89 Sharkey, Lichstein, Shen, Tokarski, Parvizi (CR22) 2014; 29 Gooding, Masri, Duncan, Greidanus, Garbuz (CR9) 2011; 469 Schroer, Berend, Lombardi, Barnes, Bolognesi, Berend, Ritter, Nunley (CR21) 2013; 28 Voleti, Baldwin, Lee (CR23) 2013; 95 Bozic, Kurtz, Lau, Ong, Chiu, Vail, Rubash, Berry (CR2) 2010; 468 Garg, Ranjan, Bandyopadhyay, Chouksey, Mitra, Gupta (CR8) 2011; 45 Anderson, Sculco, Heitkemper, Mayman, Bostrom, Sculco (CR1) 2009; 24 Hossain, Patel, Haddad (CR13) 2010; 468 10990301 - J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Aug;82(6):807-12 23011713 - JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36 15662313 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan;(430):125-31 22144747 - Indian J Orthop. 2011 Nov;45(6):535-40 7497685 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec;(321):45-54 19554385 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45-51 17403800 - J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5 23954423 - J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):116-9 24368995 - Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013 Dec;25(4):180-5 15991126 - J Arthroplasty. 2005 Jun;20(4 Suppl 2):33-6 20878287 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):985-93 22903282 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):127-33 18534535 - J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):631-5 21863391 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):228-35 24011676 - J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):553-7.e1 24768547 - J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1331 20058112 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1221-8 24005200 - J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1594-9 24615421 - Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2197-200 25007726 - J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1774-8 24464885 - J Orthop Res. 2014 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S120-9 21883049 - Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):460-4 22503491 - J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8):1474-1479.e1 Choi (R4-23-20210317) 2012; 27 Citak (R5-23-20210317) 2014; 32 Hofmann (R12-23-20210317) 1995; 321 |
References_xml | – volume: 24 start-page: 631 year: 2009 end-page: 635 ident: CR1 article-title: An articulating spacer to treat and mobilize patients with infected total knee arthroplasty publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.003 contributor: fullname: Sculco – volume: 82 start-page: 460 year: 2011 end-page: 464 ident: CR3 article-title: Comparison of articulating and static spacers regarding infection with resistant organisms in total knee arthroplasty publication-title: Acta Orthop. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.581266 contributor: fullname: Chen – volume: 95 start-page: 1594 year: 2013 end-page: 1599 ident: CR23 article-title: Use of static or articulating spacers for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01461 contributor: fullname: Lee – volume: 45 start-page: 535 year: 2011 end-page: 540 ident: CR8 article-title: Antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer for infected total knee arthroplasty publication-title: Indian J Orthop. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.87126 contributor: fullname: Gupta – volume: 321 start-page: 45 year: 1995 end-page: 54 ident: CR12 article-title: Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. contributor: fullname: Camargo – volume: 32 start-page: S120 issue: Suppl 1 year: 2014 end-page: 129 ident: CR5 article-title: Spacers publication-title: J Orthop Res. contributor: fullname: Wellman – volume: 468 start-page: 1221 year: 2010 end-page: 1228 ident: CR13 article-title: Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1204-0 contributor: fullname: Haddad – volume: 28 start-page: 116 year: 2013 end-page: 119 ident: CR21 article-title: Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011 publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.056 contributor: fullname: Nunley – volume: 20 start-page: 33 year: 2005 end-page: 36 ident: CR7 article-title: The infected total knee: management options publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.03.004 contributor: fullname: Cuckler – volume: 470 start-page: 228 year: 2012 end-page: 235 ident: CR14 article-title: Is there a preferred articulating spacer technique for infected knee arthroplasty? A preliminary study publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2037-1 contributor: fullname: Gioe – volume: 469 start-page: 985 year: 2011 end-page: 993 ident: CR9 article-title: Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1579-y contributor: fullname: Garbuz – volume: 29 start-page: 1331 year: 2014 ident: CR19 article-title: International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009 contributor: fullname: Gehrke – volume: 468 start-page: 45 year: 2010 end-page: 51 ident: CR2 article-title: The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0 contributor: fullname: Berry – volume: 25 start-page: 180 year: 2013 end-page: 185 ident: CR15 article-title: Two-stage revision using a modified articulating spacer in infected total knee arthroplasty publication-title: Knee Surg Relat Res. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.4.180 contributor: fullname: Kim – volume: 430 start-page: 125 year: 2005 end-page: 131 ident: CR11 article-title: Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer: 2- to 12-year experience publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149241.77924.01 contributor: fullname: Kurtin – volume: 472 start-page: 2197 year: 2014 end-page: 2200 ident: CR17 article-title: Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3540-y contributor: fullname: Huddleston – volume: 471 start-page: 127 year: 2013 end-page: 133 ident: CR18 article-title: Postoperative alignment and ROM affect patient satisfaction after TKA publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2533-y contributor: fullname: Iwamoto – volume: 27 start-page: e1 issue: 1474–1479 year: 2012 ident: CR4 article-title: Are prosthetic spacers safe to use in 2-stage treatment for infected total knee arthroplasty? publication-title: J Arthroplasty. contributor: fullname: Bedair – volume: 89 start-page: 780 year: 2007 end-page: 785 ident: CR16 article-title: Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 contributor: fullname: Halpern – volume: 308 start-page: 1227 year: 2012 end-page: 1236 ident: CR6 article-title: Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010 publication-title: JAMA. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11153 contributor: fullname: Wolf – volume: 82 start-page: 807 year: 2000 end-page: 812 ident: CR10 article-title: The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.10486 contributor: fullname: Duncan – volume: 29 start-page: e1 issue: 553–557 year: 2014 ident: CR20 article-title: Systematic review comparing static and articulating spacers used for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.026 contributor: fullname: Mont – volume: 29 start-page: 1774 year: 2014 end-page: 1778 ident: CR22 article-title: Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today–has anything changed after 10 years? publication-title: J Arthroplasty. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024 contributor: fullname: Parvizi – volume: 27 start-page: 1474 year: 2012 ident: R4-23-20210317 article-title: Are prosthetic spacers safe to use in 2-stage treatment for infected total knee arthroplasty? publication-title: J Arthroplasty doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.023 contributor: fullname: Choi – volume: 32 start-page: Suppl year: 2014 ident: R5-23-20210317 article-title: Spacers. publication-title: J Orthop Res contributor: fullname: Citak – volume: 321 start-page: 45 year: 1995 ident: R12-23-20210317 article-title: Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty using an articulating spacer. publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res contributor: fullname: Hofmann |
SSID | ssj0003452 |
Score | 2.4378633 |
Snippet | Background
Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but... Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but whether... Background Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but... BACKGROUNDTwo-stage exchange arthroplasty is a standard approach for treating total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection in the United States, but... |
SourceID | swepub pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 120 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Arthrometry, Articular Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation Biomechanical Phenomena Coated Materials, Biocompatible Comorbidity Conservative Orthopedics Disability Evaluation Female Humans Infection Knee Joint - microbiology Knee Joint - physiopathology Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Male Medicin och hälsovetenskap Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopedics Prosthesis Design Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery Range of Motion, Articular Recovery of Function Recurrence Reoperation Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sports Medicine Surgery Surgical Orthopedics Symposium: 2015 Knee Society Proceedings Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZKuXBBrXgtlMpInEDWxu_4hFDVagGBKrEVy8myE4ddISVLm6p_n5m8ylLBIZfYluOZiecbz8OEvE46uoLLwEohS6Zs1CwW2rBKBtBnxmmpMd_58xezuFAfV3q1RxZjLgyGVY57YrdRl02BZ-RzUHMgndwIPg8RTwGKdv5u-4vh_VHoZx0u07hH7nMBsAIk264m0yuTSovxTjUn-Gr0b3ZJdH0mPtdMKSWZ2NVQd2Dn3ejJyYX6V7nRTkWdHZCHA7ak73thOCR7qX5Evi_HUHLaVPQcBG6LiR5rTF6kn-qU6IchHqum3zbtmga6vGkYgMYfiZ5fNm0DokK7yAKKyBRGfQU7G1DjY3Jxdro8WbDhPgVWaJe1LDcmC0FEFwAWIPJJYP65vIqlcFkWCh1kynWSFpR4lUorUwrWJpmsKoF3Tj4h-3VTp2eESi2tLASv8NyoKlXkuswBinAQzBiFnZE3Iw39ti-b4W8LJCPBPRDcI8G9mJGjkcp--IOu_C2_Z-TV1Ayyjw6NUKfmuusD1py1Mp-Rpz1TptmEQZ9xDqPtDrumDlhXe7el3qy7-trK5EY5-Ky3I2P_-Kx_L0L0vN-dALSgH97_3ODjr5LnUliDVXKe_3_lL8gDwGfDic8R2W8vr9NLwEBtPO7E-zcONwUH priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9wwEBYhhZJL6CvNtklRoacWhbWe1jGULGlLykJ36eYkJHucXQL2snHI38_Ir3Sb5tCDL7ZkyTNjzTeahwj5BCrYLBGe5VzkTJqgWMiUZoXwqM-0VULFfOeLn_p8Lr8v1GKH8GHrorw-6T2SzUL9kOvWJswnikkpBcNl91nEDlGS5_x0WH2FVLw_Pc3yZNF7Mv_1im1d9AhgPo6THJylfxUWbZTR5AXZ71AkPW3Z_pLsQPmKPL_o_OSvyeWsjx-nVUGnKGXrmN2xjBmL9EcJQL91QVgl_b2ql9TT2V3FECleAZ1uqrpC-aBNOAGNcBR7_ULjGqHiGzKfnM2-nrPuEAWWKTuuWar12HserEcsEOEOoM1n0yLk3I7HPlNeQKpAGNTcBeRGAHhjQICROTLMigOyW1YlHBIqlDAi40kRN4uKXIZE5SnijwSlMQRuRuRzT063bmtluIeqyJH2DmnvIu0dH5GjnuCu-21uHGIZXIISzZMR-Tg8RoGPXgxfQnXbtEETzhiRjsjblj_DaFxHR3GKvc0W54YGsZj29pNytWyKakudamlxWl96Hv8xrac_grdisD0Aqj7X3b9excvdgEOz3-hYGufdfw3xnuwhRut2fY7Ibr25hWPEQXX40Aj-PYf5AM0 priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11999-015-4443-2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26280681 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1750701621/abstract/ https://search.proquest.com/docview/1751487738 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4686492 http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:132764815 |
Volume | 474 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED9t44UXBOIrMCoj8QTy2vgzeSxTx2DaVEEruifLThxawZJq68S_zzmJC2XihYckUuzIzt3Z9zv77gzwxkuXFym3tGS8pEI7SV0hFa24RX2mcslliHc-v1Cnc_FpIRd7IGMsTOu0X7jVUf3j6qheLVvfyvVVMYx-YsPp-bFQmRI5G-7DvuY8muj99MuFZPH4tJyli7iV2cbLdUH3qaRCCE7DUTZMhb3FLN3VS3fA5l2fye3G6V9JRlvFdPIQHvSIkoy7nj-CPV8_hstZdCAnTUWmKGbrEN6xDCGL5Kz2nnzsvbBq8nW1WRJLZj8bilDxmyfT62bToICQ1p-ABDyKX31B6xqx4hOYn0xmx6e0P0WBFjIfbWim1Mha5nKLYCDgHY9GX55VrmT5aGQLabnPpOcaVXflS829t1p77rUokWM5fwoHdVP750C45JoXLK3CalFVCpfKMkMAkqI4Osd0Am8jDc26S5ZhfqdFDrQ3SHsTaG9YAoeRyqYfNzcGwQzOQaliaQKvt8Uo8WEbw9a-uW3roA2nNc8SeNYxZdta5GYCeodd2wohm_ZuCQpZm1W7F6oE3kXG_tGtf_8E63i_2wDqPtO__74Kl7nxBu1-rUJunBf_3bmXcB8BW78EdAgHm-tb_wpB0cYNcCgs9ADujT9cnk3w-X5yMf08aIcG3uds_AuawA9r |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,891,12083,21416,27957,27958,31754,31755,33779,33780,41116,41558,42185,42627,43345,43840,52146,52269,53827,53829 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagHOCCQLwWChiJE8gi8TM-IYSotvShSmzFcrLsxGFXSMnSTcXfZyZxUpYKDrnYsezMTDzfeB4m5HVUwZa58KziomLSBMVCqTSrhQd9pq0SCvOdT071_Fx-XqplOnDbprDKcU_sN-qqLfGM_B2oOZDOXPP8_eYnw1uj0LuartC4SW5JISSG9JnlZHBl0MLHm9Qsz5ejV7NPnRvy73PFpJSC8V29dA1sXo-ZnBynfxUZ7RXTwT1yNyFK-mEQgfvkRmwekG-LMYCctjU9AzHbYHrHClMW6VETIz1MUVgN_bruVtTTxa-WAVT8HunZRdu1ICC0jyegiEdh1BewrgErPiTnB58WH-cs3aLASmWzjhVaZ97zYD2AAcQ7EYw-W9Sh4jbLfKm8iIWKwoDqrmNlRIzemCiikRVwzIpHZK9pm_iEUKGEESXPazwtqisZclUVAEByEMcQuJmRNyMN3WYoluGuyiIjwR0Q3CHBHZ-R_ZHKLv03W3fF5Rl5NXWDxKMbwzexvezfARvOGFHMyOOBKdNsXKOnuIDRZodd0wtYTXu3p1mv-qraUhdaWljW25Gxfyzr3x_BB97vTgC6z6X2H2t83DY6sPuNxto4T___5S_J7fni5NgdH54ePSN3AKGlM599stddXMbngIK68KIX9d_yhwQ6 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFLdgSIgLA_GxsAFG4gRy2_gzPqJBtTE2VaIThYtlJw6txpJqS4XEX89zEpd1E5cdckkc2dZ7z-_3_L4QeuuF03nKLCkoKwhXThCXC0lKZkGfSS2YCPnOxyfy4JR_nonZlVZfbdB-7haD6tf5oFrM29jK5Xk-jHFiw8nxPpeZ5JoOl0U5vIvugcxSHQ31_hBmXNDYRE3TdBYdmm3WXJd6nwrCOWckNLShMngYs3RTO92AnDcjJ9fu02ulRlv1NN5GP-LGuqiUs8GqcYP8z7Waj7fa-SP0sAet-EM35DG646sn6Ps0xqjjusQT4ORlyCCZh6xIfFR5jw_7QK8Kf1s0c2zx9HdNAI3-9HhyUTc18CBuQxZwgLzw11cw4AGOPkWn40_T_QPSN2ogudCjhmRSjqylTlvAGwFSebArdVa6gurRyObCMp8JzxSgg9IXinlvlfLMK14AU2j2DG1VdeV3EGaCKZbTtAwXUmXBXSqKDDBOChzvHFUJehcJZJZdPQ7zr_JyIKwBwppAWEMTtBdJaHrRvDSAl-CYSyVNE_Rm_RmEKnhKbOXrVTsGzESlWJag5x3F17NFVkmQ2uCF9YBQsHvzC1CzLdzdUy9B7yPXXFnW_zdBO8banADUq-nfny3CYy69SRlVMpTfeXHrxb1G9ycfx-bL4cnRLnoA8LC_cNpDW83Fyr8ECNa4V62w_QVN7i7s |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment+of+Periprosthetic+Knee+Infection+With+a+Two-stage+Protocol+Using+Static+Spacers&rft.jtitle=Clinical+orthopaedics+and+related+research&rft.au=Lichstein%2C+Paul&rft.au=Su%2C+Sharlene&rft.au=Hedlund%2C+Hakan&rft.au=Suh%2C+Gina&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.volume=474&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11999-015-4443-2&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s11999_015_4443_2 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0009-921X&client=summon |