Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis
Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during du...
Saved in:
Published in | Gastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 103 - 109 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Maryland heights, MO
Mosby, Inc
01.07.2011
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0016-5107 1097-6779 1097-6779 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown.
To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens.
Retrospective cohort study.
This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy.
Duodenal biopsy.
Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens.
Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%;
P < .0001).
Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results.
Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. Objective To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Design Retrospective cohort study. Patients This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Intervention Duodenal biopsy. Main Outcome Measurements Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Results Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Limitations Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Conclusion Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted. Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown.BACKGROUNDCeliac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown.To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens.OBJECTIVETo measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens.Retrospective cohort study.DESIGNRetrospective cohort study.This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy.PATIENTSThis study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy.Duodenal biopsy.INTERVENTIONDuodenal biopsy.Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTSDuodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens.Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001).RESULTSOf the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001).Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results.LIMITATIONSRetrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results.Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.CONCLUSIONAlthough this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted. Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Retrospective cohort study. This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted. Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Retrospective cohort study. This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted. |
Author | Lebwohl, Benjamin Green, Peter H.R. Kapel, Robert C. Neugut, Alfred I. Genta, Robert M. |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 5 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 3 Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut 6 Department of Pathology, Dallas VAMC and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 4 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 6 Department of Pathology, Dallas VAMC and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas – name: 4 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York – name: 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut – name: 3 Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas – name: 1 Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York – name: 5 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Benjamin surname: Lebwohl fullname: Lebwohl, Benjamin organization: Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Robert C. surname: Kapel fullname: Kapel, Robert C. organization: Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Alfred I. surname: Neugut fullname: Neugut, Alfred I. organization: Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Peter H.R. surname: Green fullname: Green, Peter H.R. organization: Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Robert M. surname: Genta fullname: Genta, Robert M. organization: Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas, USA |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24327144$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1URLeFP8AB5YJ6SvDY-USo0qriS6rEAThbzsTezpK1Fztbaf89DrsUqESRD-Mkz_uOJu-csRPnnWHsOfACONSv1sWKTCE4QMFlAULWj9gCeNfkddN0J2zBE5VXwJtTdhbjmnPeCglP2KmAmkMSLthyOdyYYByabPJZT34b99lqR4MZyZmYkcNgdEw3TG80ZgPF-TlVvXI-UnzKHls9RvPsWM_Z13dvv1x9yK8_vf94tbzOser4lFe9xd4ONVS2q3peNVyj1MLaDmWN2mJTtz1CKVtpEVAPlRV2qLAVvU2nl-fs8uC73fUbM6BxU9Cj2gba6LBXXpP6-4ujG7Xyt0rWFbRNnQwujgbBf9-ZOKkNxTTVqJ3xu6japuTQAp_JF3-2uuvx67cl4OUR0BH1aIN2SPE3V0rRQFkmThw4DD7GYOwdAlzNGaq1ShmqOUPFpZozTKL2nghp0hP5eSwaH5a-OUhNCuKWTFARaQ53oGBwUoOnh-WX9-SYtoDShN_M3sS13wWXIlagolBcfZ73a14vSIYV_DR4_W-D_3X_AVxX4Hk |
CODEN | GAENBQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2015_05_023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_012_2551_3 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1520_4184 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2020_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000041 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5985_23_03396_X crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2012_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_gov006 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2017_314109 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000000834 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_17_31796_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2023_101843 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_08_020 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_12392 crossref_primary_10_1093_pch_18_5_246 crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2017_1274231 crossref_primary_10_1111_joim_13120 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00292_015_0006_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4405_x crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2012_236 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_020_05815_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_diseases3020086 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2017_121 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i42_7233 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000343 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2016_311574 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2024_12_010 crossref_primary_10_1177_23247096211053702 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2017_000140 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_018_5050_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16971 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16851 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2023_330913 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2013_306578 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_10_027 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000003252 crossref_primary_10_3310_ZUCE8371 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v11_i2_145 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_053 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000000602 crossref_primary_10_1177_1756283X16637532 crossref_primary_10_1159_000525398 crossref_primary_10_4103_IJPM_IJPM_1405_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_08_023 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_230X_12_90 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jff_2017_03_019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11377_015_0018_8 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2020_000544 crossref_primary_10_1159_000369510 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2019_06_012 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_13249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_10_016 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms251910383 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2018_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2016_01_029 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1741_5946 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0b013e3283561f0d crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2012_12_024 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002541 crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2021_1887926 crossref_primary_10_4103_jod_jod_170_24 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2015_07_040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2019_02_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2015_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2013_12_005 crossref_primary_10_3109_00365521_2014_923502 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v21_i9_2593 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001639 crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2013_79 crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2011_200372 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41575_021_00552_z crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_06_098 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v5_i7_313 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2023_12_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_031 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0b013e3283643542 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16621 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10190_013_0363_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11298_016_5554_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_18_31894_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_01_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina57111212 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMclde2102480 crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2011_0572_RA crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_020_02832_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_07_028 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejim_2018_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000002158 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000002150 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_jpr3_12160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2015_01_044 crossref_primary_10_3390_gastroent13010009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAP_0000000000000242 crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwt234 crossref_primary_10_3109_10408363_2014_958813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0b013e31827a6f83 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu10111796 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001806 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_12164 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000000957 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2022_06_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_011 crossref_primary_10_5402_2013_623936 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002075 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000001574 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90060-7 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00302-4 10.1053/gast.2002.36585 10.1053/jcgh.2003.50004 10.1001/jama.2009.1320 10.1016/j.dld.2006.03.002 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1086 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.027 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.030 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91819-P 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02177.x 10.1038/ajg.2009.104 10.1001/archinte.163.3.286 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004 10.1055/s-2007-995361 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x 10.1056/NEJMoa055498 10.3748/wjg.v13.i1.146 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40176.x 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.04.010 10.1016/j.dld.2009.11.010 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.015 10.1056/NEJMra071600 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.018 10.1136/bmj.38169.486701.7C 10.1097/00042737-199910000-00019 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy – notice: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6779 |
EndPage | 109 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC3651876 21601201 24327144 10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236 S0016510711015136 1_s2_0_S0016510711015136 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: KL2 TR000081 – fundername: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences : NCATS grantid: KL2 TR000081 || TR |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FD8 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HDZ HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K-O KOM L7B LZ1 M28 M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OC. ON0 OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UNMZH UV1 WH7 WOW X7M Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG 6I. AAFTH AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-5bfcbfd615f95b0570ac3a2ff9c36cafc768bc14383fc1cad5f2fd5c82bfbfbb3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:43:15 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 10:17:02 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:31 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:15:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:45:35 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:34:02 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:46 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:31:26 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | CD celiac disease Immunopathology Intestinal malabsorption Biopsy Digestive diseases Intestinal disease Diagnosis Coeliac disease |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c590t-5bfcbfd615f95b0570ac3a2ff9c36cafc768bc14383fc1cad5f2fd5c82bfbfbb3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510711015136 |
PMID | 21601201 |
PQID | 874018106 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3651876 proquest_miscellaneous_874018106 pubmed_primary_21601201 pascalfrancis_primary_24327144 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0016510711015136 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2011 text: 2011-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Maryland heights, MO |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Maryland heights, MO – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gastrointest Endosc |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | Mosby, Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mosby, Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Askling, Linet, Gridley (bib9) 2002; 123 Green, Fleischauer, Bhagat (bib5) 2003; 115 Yantiss, Odze (bib20) 2009; 104 Rex, Johnson, Anderson (bib24) 2009; 104 Anderson, McMillan, Watson (bib8) 2007; 13 Barclay, Vicari, Doughty (bib23) 2006; 355 Sonnenberg, Lash, Genta (bib25) 2010; 139 Hopper, Cross, Sanders (bib15) 2008; 40 Logan, Rifkind, Turner (bib7) 1989; 97 Hassall (bib27) 2010; 72 McBride, Lebwohl, Hershman (bib21) 2010; 19 Abrams, Kapel, Lindberg (bib26) 2009; 7 West, Logan, Smith (bib6) 2004; 329 Pais, Duerksen, Pettigrew (bib14) 2008; 67 Harewood, Holub, Lieberman (bib12) 2004; 99 Viljamaa, Kaukinen, Pukkala (bib10) 2006; 38 Fasano, Berti, Gerarduzzi (bib2) 2003; 163 Genta, Kinsey, Singhal (bib19) 2010; 41 Marsh (bib16) 1992; 102 Carmack, Genta (bib18) 2010; 42 Chen, Rex (bib22) 2007; 102 Murray, Van Dyke, Plevak (bib3) 2003; 1 Card, West, Holmes (bib11) 2004; 20 Rostom, Murray, Kagnoff (bib13) 2006; 131 Oberhuber, Granditsch, Vogelsang (bib17) 1999; 11 Green, Cellier (bib1) 2007; 357 Ludvigsson, Montgomery, Ekbom (bib4) 2009; 302 Genta (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib19) 2010; 41 Harewood (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib12) 2004; 99 Logan (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib7) 1989; 97 West (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib6) 2004; 329 Rex (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib24) 2009; 104 Sonnenberg (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib25) 2010; 139 Green (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib5) 2003; 115 Oberhuber (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib17) 1999; 11 Askling (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib9) 2002; 123 Fasano (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib2) 2003; 163 Yantiss (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib20) 2009; 104 Green (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib1) 2007; 357 Viljamaa (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib10) 2006; 38 Chen (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib22) 2007; 102 Marsh (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib16) 1992; 102 Murray (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib3) 2003; 1 Hopper (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib15) 2008; 40 Barclay (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib23) 2006; 355 Anderson (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib8) 2007; 13 Card (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib11) 2004; 20 Pais (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib14) 2008; 67 Carmack (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib18) 2010; 42 Abrams (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib26) 2009; 7 Ludvigsson (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib4) 2009; 302 Rostom (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib13) 2006; 131 McBride (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib21) 2010; 19 Hassall (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib27) 2010; 72 17222317 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61 15017513 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jan;1(1):19-27 17206762 - World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 7;13(1):146-51 10524652 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Oct;11(10):1185-94 18058655 - Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):219-24 20200428 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):738-45 20801288 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):569-71 18308317 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1082-7 20656325 - Hum Pathol. 2010 Nov;41(11):1593-600 19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50 16627018 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jun;38(6):374-80 15269095 - BMJ. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):716-9 15330920 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1790-4 20036203 - Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jul;42(7):485-9 17167136 - N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41 15379837 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Oct 1;20(7):769-75 19209164 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):774-83 19755695 - JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1171-8 20727889 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1894-1901.e2; quiz e12 2744350 - Gastroenterology. 1989 Aug;97(2):265-71 1727768 - Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):330-54 12404215 - Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1428-35 17087937 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002 12935825 - Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5 12578508 - Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92 19268726 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):736-42; quiz 710 17960014 - N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731-43 |
References_xml | – volume: 19 start-page: 738 year: 2010 end-page: 745 ident: bib21 article-title: Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – volume: 42 start-page: 485 year: 2010 end-page: 489 ident: bib18 article-title: The diagnostic value of the duodenal biopsy: a clinico-pathologic analysis of 28,000 patients publication-title: Dig Liver Dis – volume: 104 start-page: 774 year: 2009 end-page: 783 ident: bib20 article-title: Optimal approach to obtaining mucosal biopsies for assessment of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 329 start-page: 716 year: 2004 end-page: 719 ident: bib6 article-title: Malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease: population based cohort study publication-title: BMJ – volume: 131 start-page: 1981 year: 2006 end-page: 2002 ident: bib13 article-title: American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 163 start-page: 286 year: 2003 end-page: 292 ident: bib2 article-title: Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study publication-title: Arch Intern Med – volume: 41 start-page: 1593 year: 2010 end-page: 1600 ident: bib19 article-title: Gastric foveolar metaplasia and gastric heterotopia in the duodenum: no evidence of an etiologic role for Helicobacter pylori publication-title: Hum Pathol – volume: 72 start-page: 569 year: 2010 end-page: 571 ident: bib27 article-title: Not everything is celiac disease publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 102 start-page: 330 year: 1992 end-page: 354 ident: bib16 article-title: Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 104 start-page: 739 year: 2009 end-page: 750 ident: bib24 article-title: American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 38 start-page: 374 year: 2006 end-page: 380 ident: bib10 article-title: Malignancies and mortality in patients with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis: 30-year population-based study publication-title: Dig Liver Dis – volume: 115 start-page: 191 year: 2003 end-page: 195 ident: bib5 article-title: Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease publication-title: Am J Med – volume: 97 start-page: 265 year: 1989 end-page: 271 ident: bib7 article-title: Mortality in celiac disease publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 11 start-page: 1185 year: 1999 end-page: 1194 ident: bib17 article-title: The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 13 start-page: 146 year: 2007 end-page: 151 ident: bib8 article-title: Malignancy and mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with coeliac disease or “gluten sensitivity.” publication-title: World J Gastroenterol – volume: 99 start-page: 1790 year: 2004 end-page: 1794 ident: bib12 article-title: Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 1 start-page: 19 year: 2003 end-page: 27 ident: bib3 article-title: Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950-2001 publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 123 start-page: 1428 year: 2002 end-page: 1435 ident: bib9 article-title: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalized with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 139 start-page: 1894 year: 2010 end-page: 1901 ident: bib25 article-title: A national study of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 40 start-page: 219 year: 2008 end-page: 224 ident: bib15 article-title: Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: Is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 20 start-page: 769 year: 2004 end-page: 775 ident: bib11 article-title: Risk of malignancy in diagnosed coeliac disease: a 24-year prospective, population-based, cohort study publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther – volume: 357 start-page: 1731 year: 2007 end-page: 1743 ident: bib1 article-title: Celiac disease publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 355 start-page: 2533 year: 2006 end-page: 2541 ident: bib23 article-title: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 67 start-page: 1082 year: 2008 end-page: 1087 ident: bib14 article-title: How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease? publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 102 start-page: 856 year: 2007 end-page: 861 ident: bib22 article-title: Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 302 start-page: 1171 year: 2009 end-page: 1178 ident: bib4 article-title: Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease publication-title: JAMA – volume: 7 start-page: 736 year: 2009 end-page: 742 ident: bib26 article-title: Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 97 start-page: 265 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib7 article-title: Mortality in celiac disease publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90060-7 – volume: 115 start-page: 191 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib5 article-title: Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease publication-title: Am J Med doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00302-4 – volume: 123 start-page: 1428 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib9 article-title: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalized with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.36585 – volume: 1 start-page: 19 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib3 article-title: Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950-2001 publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1053/jcgh.2003.50004 – volume: 302 start-page: 1171 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib4 article-title: Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1320 – volume: 38 start-page: 374 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib10 article-title: Malignancies and mortality in patients with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis: 30-year population-based study publication-title: Dig Liver Dis doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.03.002 – volume: 19 start-page: 738 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib21 article-title: Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1086 – volume: 7 start-page: 736 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib26 article-title: Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.027 – volume: 72 start-page: 569 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib27 article-title: Not everything is celiac disease publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.030 – volume: 102 start-page: 330 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib16 article-title: Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91819-P – volume: 20 start-page: 769 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib11 article-title: Risk of malignancy in diagnosed coeliac disease: a 24-year prospective, population-based, cohort study publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02177.x – volume: 104 start-page: 739 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib24 article-title: American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104 – volume: 163 start-page: 286 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib2 article-title: Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.286 – volume: 131 start-page: 1981 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib13 article-title: American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004 – volume: 40 start-page: 219 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib15 article-title: Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: Is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995361 – volume: 102 start-page: 856 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib22 article-title: Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x – volume: 355 start-page: 2533 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib23 article-title: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498 – volume: 13 start-page: 146 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib8 article-title: Malignancy and mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with coeliac disease or “gluten sensitivity.” publication-title: World J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i1.146 – volume: 99 start-page: 1790 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib12 article-title: Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40176.x – volume: 41 start-page: 1593 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib19 article-title: Gastric foveolar metaplasia and gastric heterotopia in the duodenum: no evidence of an etiologic role for Helicobacter pylori publication-title: Hum Pathol doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.04.010 – volume: 42 start-page: 485 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib18 article-title: The diagnostic value of the duodenal biopsy: a clinico-pathologic analysis of 28,000 patients publication-title: Dig Liver Dis doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.11.010 – volume: 104 start-page: 774 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib20 article-title: Optimal approach to obtaining mucosal biopsies for assessment of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 67 start-page: 1082 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib14 article-title: How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease? publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.015 – volume: 357 start-page: 1731 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib1 article-title: Celiac disease publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071600 – volume: 139 start-page: 1894 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib25 article-title: A national study of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.018 – volume: 329 start-page: 716 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib6 article-title: Malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease: population based cohort study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.38169.486701.7C – volume: 11 start-page: 1185 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib17 article-title: The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1097/00042737-199910000-00019 – reference: 12578508 - Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92 – reference: 18058655 - Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):219-24 – reference: 16627018 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jun;38(6):374-80 – reference: 17167136 - N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41 – reference: 15330920 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1790-4 – reference: 2744350 - Gastroenterology. 1989 Aug;97(2):265-71 – reference: 19755695 - JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1171-8 – reference: 20727889 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1894-1901.e2; quiz e12 – reference: 1727768 - Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):330-54 – reference: 12404215 - Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1428-35 – reference: 17206762 - World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 7;13(1):146-51 – reference: 17087937 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002 – reference: 12935825 - Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5 – reference: 15269095 - BMJ. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):716-9 – reference: 17960014 - N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731-43 – reference: 20801288 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):569-71 – reference: 19209164 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):774-83 – reference: 20036203 - Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jul;42(7):485-9 – reference: 19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50 – reference: 10524652 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Oct;11(10):1185-94 – reference: 19268726 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):736-42; quiz 710 – reference: 15017513 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jan;1(1):19-27 – reference: 17222317 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61 – reference: 20200428 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):738-45 – reference: 20656325 - Hum Pathol. 2010 Nov;41(11):1593-600 – reference: 15379837 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Oct 1;20(7):769-75 – reference: 18308317 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1082-7 |
SSID | ssj0008231 |
Score | 2.3895843 |
Snippet | Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal... Background Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 103 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Celiac Disease - pathology Cohort Studies Digestive system. Abdomen Duodenum - pathology Endoscopy Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Guideline Adherence Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Logistic Models Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology Retrospective Studies Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus United States |
Title | Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0016510711015136 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0016510711015136 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601201 https://www.proquest.com/docview/874018106 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3651876 |
Volume | 74 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEB5CCqVQSt9VH0aH3ooSSSutpKMJDW5Lcmogt2UfmkSlyKayD73kt2dGu3LqNk2h-CAj7WBm9O3MrOcF8N4VFQGh0kmVGZ0UjTOJwczwC7FW1jJ1yBHdk1O5OCs-n5fne3A01cJwWmXQ_V6nj9o63DkM0jxcdR3X-GaSEFWRASOzJbjtdlFUjPKDq5s0Dw5zeW0sE14dCmd8jtdF14YunuKA25D8zTg9XOmBRIZ-1sVtzujvOZW_GKnjx_AoeJfx3DPwBPba_incPwnx82cwn7tLX98Xr5ex6Zar4Wd8seFWV5z-Hnc9O5EDfbN0R9s4xG_oOmbkdcNzODv--PVokYQhCoktm3SdlAatQUeOCzalIe8s1VboHLGxQlqNls4bxvIQdIE2s9qVmKMrbZ0bpI8RL2C_X_btK4hlZqTFwrm6dQWSURM1akTZ6EpoiTqCbJKesqHDOA-6-K6mVLJviiSuWOIqFYolHsGHLc3K99e4c7WYXoqaKkdJ1ylS_3dSVbdRtUPYroPK1JCrVP0BqQjKLeUOKv_5i7MdxGxZywuRV3SGjSCeIKRoP3OQRvftcjOocURiTQf1CF56RN0QZ5JLnTPiZwdr2wXcKnz3Sd9dji3DBbFFdu_1f_LzBh74_9I5Tfkt7K9_bNp35IytzWzcbTO4N__0ZXF6Db4qNOY |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LbtRAzCpbCZAQ4k14lBy4odAkk0yS46qi2tLunlqpt9E84jYIZVdk98DfY28mgYVSJJRDoslYkT0e2xO_AN67rCBGKHRUJEZHWeVMZDAxvCDWylLGDtmjO1_I2UX2-TK_3IOjIReGwyq97O9l-lZa-5FDT83DVdNwjm8iiaMKUmCktoS8A_tcnSqfwP705HS2GAUye7p6gSwjBvC5M32Y11VT-0Ke4iNXIvmbfnqw0h1RDft2FzfZo7-HVf6ip44fwUNvYIbTHofHsFe3T-Du3LvQn8J06q77FL9wvQxNs1x138OrDVe74gj4sGnZjuzoydKItqF34dB9G5TXdM_g4vjT-dEs8n0UIptX8TrKDVqDjmwXrHJDBlqsrdApYmWFtBotHTmM5T7oAm1itcsxRZfbMjVIlxHPYdIu2_olhDIx0mLmXFm7DEmviRI1oqx0IbREHUAyUE9ZX2Sce118VUM02RdFFFdMcRULxRQP4MMIs-pLbNw6WwyLoobkURJ3ijTArVDFTVB153dspxLVpSpWf3BVAPkIucOY__ziwQ7HjKilmUgLOsYGEA4spGhLs59Gt_Vy06ltl8SSzuoBvOg56idwIjnbOSF8dnhtnMDVwnfftM31tmq4ILRI9b36T3zewb3Z-fxMnZ0sTl_D_f7XOkctv4HJ-tumfku22doc-L33AzP4N5c |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence+to+biopsy+guidelines+increases+celiac+disease+diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal+endoscopy&rft.au=LEBWOHL%2C+Benjamin&rft.au=KAPEL%2C+Robert+C&rft.au=NEUGUT%2C+Alfred+I&rft.au=GREEN%2C+Peter+H.+R&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.gie.2011.03.1236&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=24327144 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00165107%2FS0016510711X0007X%2Fcov150h.gif |