Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis

Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during du...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGastrointestinal endoscopy Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 103 - 109
Main Authors Lebwohl, Benjamin, Kapel, Robert C., Neugut, Alfred I., Green, Peter H.R., Genta, Robert M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Maryland heights, MO Mosby, Inc 01.07.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0016-5107
1097-6779
1097-6779
DOI10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Retrospective cohort study. This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.
AbstractList Background Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. Objective To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Design Retrospective cohort study. Patients This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Intervention Duodenal biopsy. Main Outcome Measurements Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Results Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Limitations Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Conclusion Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.
Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown.BACKGROUNDCeliac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown.To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens.OBJECTIVETo measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens.Retrospective cohort study.DESIGNRetrospective cohort study.This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy.PATIENTSThis study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy.Duodenal biopsy.INTERVENTIONDuodenal biopsy.Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTSDuodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens.Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001).RESULTSOf the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001).Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results.LIMITATIONSRetrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results.Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.CONCLUSIONAlthough this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.
Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Retrospective cohort study. This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.
Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal biopsy. The degree of adherence to this recommendation in clinical practice is unknown. To measure the number of specimens submitted during duodenal biopsy among patients throughout the United States and to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of adherence to the recommended number of specimens. Retrospective cohort study. This study involved 132,352 patients without known CD who underwent duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy. Duodenal biopsy specimens were submitted to a pathology laboratory operating in 43 states in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with submitting ≥4 specimens. We also compared the prevalence of newly diagnosed CD in biopsies with ≥4 specimens with that in biopsies with <4 specimens. Of the 132,352 patients who underwent biopsy (67% women, mean age 52.9 years), ≥4 specimens were submitted in 45,995 cases (35%). A modest increase in the proportion of biopsies with ≥4 specimens occurred after this guideline was proposed in 2006 (odds ratio for 2009 vs 2006, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.88), but the rate of adherence in 2009 remained low at 37%. Among patients in whom the indication was malabsorption/suspected CD (n = 3261), adherence to this standard was only 39.5%. The probability of a new diagnosis of CD was increased when ≥4 specimens were submitted (1.8% vs 0.7%; P < .0001). Retrospective analysis lacking clinical follow-up. The guideline publication occurred during the study period, possibly influencing clinical practice and confounding results. Although this proposed standard remains a subject of debate, adherence to submitting ≥4 specimens is low in the United States. Adherence yields a diagnosis rate of 1.8%, a small absolute increase but a doubling of the diagnosis rate of CD. Efforts to increase adherence are warranted.
Author Lebwohl, Benjamin
Green, Peter H.R.
Kapel, Robert C.
Neugut, Alfred I.
Genta, Robert M.
AuthorAffiliation 1 Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
5 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
3 Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
2 Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut
6 Department of Pathology, Dallas VAMC and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
4 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 6 Department of Pathology, Dallas VAMC and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
– name: 4 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
– name: 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut
– name: 3 Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas
– name: 1 Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
– name: 5 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Benjamin
  surname: Lebwohl
  fullname: Lebwohl, Benjamin
  organization: Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Robert C.
  surname: Kapel
  fullname: Kapel, Robert C.
  organization: Division of Gastroenterology, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Alfred I.
  surname: Neugut
  fullname: Neugut, Alfred I.
  organization: Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Peter H.R.
  surname: Green
  fullname: Green, Peter H.R.
  organization: Celiac Disease Center, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Robert M.
  surname: Genta
  fullname: Genta, Robert M.
  organization: Caris Research Institute, Caris Life Sciences, Irving, Texas, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24327144$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1URLeFP8AB5YJ6SvDY-USo0qriS6rEAThbzsTezpK1Fztbaf89DrsUqESRD-Mkz_uOJu-csRPnnWHsOfACONSv1sWKTCE4QMFlAULWj9gCeNfkddN0J2zBE5VXwJtTdhbjmnPeCglP2KmAmkMSLthyOdyYYByabPJZT34b99lqR4MZyZmYkcNgdEw3TG80ZgPF-TlVvXI-UnzKHls9RvPsWM_Z13dvv1x9yK8_vf94tbzOser4lFe9xd4ONVS2q3peNVyj1MLaDmWN2mJTtz1CKVtpEVAPlRV2qLAVvU2nl-fs8uC73fUbM6BxU9Cj2gba6LBXXpP6-4ujG7Xyt0rWFbRNnQwujgbBf9-ZOKkNxTTVqJ3xu6japuTQAp_JF3-2uuvx67cl4OUR0BH1aIN2SPE3V0rRQFkmThw4DD7GYOwdAlzNGaq1ShmqOUPFpZozTKL2nghp0hP5eSwaH5a-OUhNCuKWTFARaQ53oGBwUoOnh-WX9-SYtoDShN_M3sS13wWXIlagolBcfZ73a14vSIYV_DR4_W-D_3X_AVxX4Hk
CODEN GAENBQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2015_05_023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_012_2551_3
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1520_4184
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2020_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000041
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5985_23_03396_X
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2012_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1093_gastro_gov006
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2017_314109
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000000834
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_17_31796_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2023_101843
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_08_020
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_12392
crossref_primary_10_1093_pch_18_5_246
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2017_1274231
crossref_primary_10_1111_joim_13120
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00292_015_0006_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4405_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2012_236
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_020_05815_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_diseases3020086
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrgastro_2017_121
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i42_7233
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0000000000000343
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2016_311574
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2024_12_010
crossref_primary_10_1177_23247096211053702
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2017_000140
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_018_5050_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16971
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16851
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2023_330913
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2013_306578
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_10_027
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000003252
crossref_primary_10_3310_ZUCE8371
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v11_i2_145
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_053
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000000602
crossref_primary_10_1177_1756283X16637532
crossref_primary_10_1159_000525398
crossref_primary_10_4103_IJPM_IJPM_1405_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_08_023
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_230X_12_90
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jff_2017_03_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11377_015_0018_8
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2020_000544
crossref_primary_10_1159_000369510
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2019_06_012
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_13249
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_10_016
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms251910383
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2018_06_025
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2016_01_029
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1741_5946
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOG_0b013e3283561f0d
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2012_12_024
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002541
crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2021_1887926
crossref_primary_10_4103_jod_jod_170_24
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2015_07_040
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2019_02_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2015_02_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2013_12_005
crossref_primary_10_3109_00365521_2014_923502
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v21_i9_2593
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001639
crossref_primary_10_1038_ajg_2013_79
crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2011_200372
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41575_021_00552_z
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2020_06_098
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v5_i7_313
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2023_12_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2016_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_031
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0b013e3283643542
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_16621
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10190_013_0363_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11298_016_5554_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_18_31894_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_01_001
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina57111212
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMclde2102480
crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2011_0572_RA
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_020_02832_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_07_028
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2024_01_029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejim_2018_11_012
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000002158
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001107
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000002150
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2018_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1002_jpr3_12160
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_gastro_2015_01_044
crossref_primary_10_3390_gastroent13010009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2014_10_024
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAP_0000000000000242
crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwt234
crossref_primary_10_3109_10408363_2014_958813
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2012_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0b013e31827a6f83
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu10111796
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_med_2016_02_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001806
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_12164
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000000957
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2022_06_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2012_07_011
crossref_primary_10_5402_2013_623936
crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002075
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000001574
Cites_doi 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90060-7
10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00302-4
10.1053/gast.2002.36585
10.1053/jcgh.2003.50004
10.1001/jama.2009.1320
10.1016/j.dld.2006.03.002
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1086
10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.027
10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.030
10.1016/0016-5085(92)91819-P
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02177.x
10.1038/ajg.2009.104
10.1001/archinte.163.3.286
10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004
10.1055/s-2007-995361
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x
10.1056/NEJMoa055498
10.3748/wjg.v13.i1.146
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40176.x
10.1016/j.humpath.2010.04.010
10.1016/j.dld.2009.11.010
10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.015
10.1056/NEJMra071600
10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.018
10.1136/bmj.38169.486701.7C
10.1097/00042737-199910000-00019
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011
Copyright_xml – notice: 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
– notice: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. 2011
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6779
EndPage 109
ExternalDocumentID PMC3651876
21601201
24327144
10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236
S0016510711015136
1_s2_0_S0016510711015136
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: KL2 TR000081
– fundername: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences : NCATS
  grantid: KL2 TR000081 || TR
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FD8
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDZ
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
LZ1
M28
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OC.
ON0
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
WOW
X7M
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
6I.
AAFTH
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c590t-5bfcbfd615f95b0570ac3a2ff9c36cafc768bc14383fc1cad5f2fd5c82bfbfbb3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0016-5107
1097-6779
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:43:15 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 10:17:02 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:31 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:45:35 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:34:02 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:46 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:31:26 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords CD
celiac disease
Immunopathology
Intestinal malabsorption
Biopsy
Digestive diseases
Intestinal disease
Diagnosis
Coeliac disease
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c590t-5bfcbfd615f95b0570ac3a2ff9c36cafc768bc14383fc1cad5f2fd5c82bfbfbb3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510711015136
PMID 21601201
PQID 874018106
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3651876
proquest_miscellaneous_874018106
pubmed_primary_21601201
pascalfrancis_primary_24327144
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0016510711015136
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_gie_2011_03_1236
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Maryland heights, MO
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Maryland heights, MO
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Gastrointestinal endoscopy
PublicationTitleAlternate Gastrointest Endosc
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Mosby, Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Mosby, Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Askling, Linet, Gridley (bib9) 2002; 123
Green, Fleischauer, Bhagat (bib5) 2003; 115
Yantiss, Odze (bib20) 2009; 104
Rex, Johnson, Anderson (bib24) 2009; 104
Anderson, McMillan, Watson (bib8) 2007; 13
Barclay, Vicari, Doughty (bib23) 2006; 355
Sonnenberg, Lash, Genta (bib25) 2010; 139
Hopper, Cross, Sanders (bib15) 2008; 40
Logan, Rifkind, Turner (bib7) 1989; 97
Hassall (bib27) 2010; 72
McBride, Lebwohl, Hershman (bib21) 2010; 19
Abrams, Kapel, Lindberg (bib26) 2009; 7
West, Logan, Smith (bib6) 2004; 329
Pais, Duerksen, Pettigrew (bib14) 2008; 67
Harewood, Holub, Lieberman (bib12) 2004; 99
Viljamaa, Kaukinen, Pukkala (bib10) 2006; 38
Fasano, Berti, Gerarduzzi (bib2) 2003; 163
Genta, Kinsey, Singhal (bib19) 2010; 41
Marsh (bib16) 1992; 102
Carmack, Genta (bib18) 2010; 42
Chen, Rex (bib22) 2007; 102
Murray, Van Dyke, Plevak (bib3) 2003; 1
Card, West, Holmes (bib11) 2004; 20
Rostom, Murray, Kagnoff (bib13) 2006; 131
Oberhuber, Granditsch, Vogelsang (bib17) 1999; 11
Green, Cellier (bib1) 2007; 357
Ludvigsson, Montgomery, Ekbom (bib4) 2009; 302
Genta (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib19) 2010; 41
Harewood (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib12) 2004; 99
Logan (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib7) 1989; 97
West (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib6) 2004; 329
Rex (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib24) 2009; 104
Sonnenberg (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib25) 2010; 139
Green (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib5) 2003; 115
Oberhuber (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib17) 1999; 11
Askling (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib9) 2002; 123
Fasano (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib2) 2003; 163
Yantiss (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib20) 2009; 104
Green (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib1) 2007; 357
Viljamaa (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib10) 2006; 38
Chen (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib22) 2007; 102
Marsh (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib16) 1992; 102
Murray (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib3) 2003; 1
Hopper (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib15) 2008; 40
Barclay (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib23) 2006; 355
Anderson (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib8) 2007; 13
Card (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib11) 2004; 20
Pais (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib14) 2008; 67
Carmack (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib18) 2010; 42
Abrams (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib26) 2009; 7
Ludvigsson (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib4) 2009; 302
Rostom (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib13) 2006; 131
McBride (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib21) 2010; 19
Hassall (10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib27) 2010; 72
17222317 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61
15017513 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jan;1(1):19-27
17206762 - World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 7;13(1):146-51
10524652 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Oct;11(10):1185-94
18058655 - Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):219-24
20200428 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):738-45
20801288 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):569-71
18308317 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1082-7
20656325 - Hum Pathol. 2010 Nov;41(11):1593-600
19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50
16627018 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jun;38(6):374-80
15269095 - BMJ. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):716-9
15330920 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1790-4
20036203 - Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jul;42(7):485-9
17167136 - N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41
15379837 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Oct 1;20(7):769-75
19209164 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):774-83
19755695 - JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1171-8
20727889 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1894-1901.e2; quiz e12
2744350 - Gastroenterology. 1989 Aug;97(2):265-71
1727768 - Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):330-54
12404215 - Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1428-35
17087937 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002
12935825 - Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5
12578508 - Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92
19268726 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):736-42; quiz 710
17960014 - N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731-43
References_xml – volume: 19
  start-page: 738
  year: 2010
  end-page: 745
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– volume: 42
  start-page: 485
  year: 2010
  end-page: 489
  ident: bib18
  article-title: The diagnostic value of the duodenal biopsy: a clinico-pathologic analysis of 28,000 patients
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
– volume: 104
  start-page: 774
  year: 2009
  end-page: 783
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Optimal approach to obtaining mucosal biopsies for assessment of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 329
  start-page: 716
  year: 2004
  end-page: 719
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease: population based cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 131
  start-page: 1981
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2002
  ident: bib13
  article-title: American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 163
  start-page: 286
  year: 2003
  end-page: 292
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1593
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1600
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Gastric foveolar metaplasia and gastric heterotopia in the duodenum: no evidence of an etiologic role for Helicobacter pylori
  publication-title: Hum Pathol
– volume: 72
  start-page: 569
  year: 2010
  end-page: 571
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Not everything is celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 102
  start-page: 330
  year: 1992
  end-page: 354
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 104
  start-page: 739
  year: 2009
  end-page: 750
  ident: bib24
  article-title: American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 374
  year: 2006
  end-page: 380
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Malignancies and mortality in patients with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis: 30-year population-based study
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
– volume: 115
  start-page: 191
  year: 2003
  end-page: 195
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease
  publication-title: Am J Med
– volume: 97
  start-page: 265
  year: 1989
  end-page: 271
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Mortality in celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1185
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1194
  ident: bib17
  article-title: The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 13
  start-page: 146
  year: 2007
  end-page: 151
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Malignancy and mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with coeliac disease or “gluten sensitivity.”
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1790
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1794
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 1
  start-page: 19
  year: 2003
  end-page: 27
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950-2001
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1428
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1435
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalized with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 139
  start-page: 1894
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1901
  ident: bib25
  article-title: A national study of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 40
  start-page: 219
  year: 2008
  end-page: 224
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: Is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate?
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 20
  start-page: 769
  year: 2004
  end-page: 775
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Risk of malignancy in diagnosed coeliac disease: a 24-year prospective, population-based, cohort study
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
– volume: 357
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1743
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Celiac disease
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 355
  start-page: 2533
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2541
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1082
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1087
  ident: bib14
  article-title: How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease?
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 102
  start-page: 856
  year: 2007
  end-page: 861
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 302
  start-page: 1171
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1178
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 7
  start-page: 736
  year: 2009
  end-page: 742
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
– volume: 97
  start-page: 265
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib7
  article-title: Mortality in celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90060-7
– volume: 115
  start-page: 191
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib5
  article-title: Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00302-4
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1428
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib9
  article-title: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of individuals hospitalized with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.36585
– volume: 1
  start-page: 19
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib3
  article-title: Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950-2001
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1053/jcgh.2003.50004
– volume: 302
  start-page: 1171
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib4
  article-title: Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1320
– volume: 38
  start-page: 374
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib10
  article-title: Malignancies and mortality in patients with coeliac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis: 30-year population-based study
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.03.002
– volume: 19
  start-page: 738
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib21
  article-title: Impact of socioeconomic status on extent of lymph node dissection for colon cancer
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1086
– volume: 7
  start-page: 736
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib26
  article-title: Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.027
– volume: 72
  start-page: 569
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib27
  article-title: Not everything is celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.030
– volume: 102
  start-page: 330
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib16
  article-title: Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91819-P
– volume: 20
  start-page: 769
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib11
  article-title: Risk of malignancy in diagnosed coeliac disease: a 24-year prospective, population-based, cohort study
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02177.x
– volume: 104
  start-page: 739
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib24
  article-title: American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104
– volume: 163
  start-page: 286
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib2
  article-title: Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.286
– volume: 131
  start-page: 1981
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib13
  article-title: American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004
– volume: 40
  start-page: 219
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib15
  article-title: Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: Is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate?
  publication-title: Endoscopy
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995361
– volume: 102
  start-page: 856
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib22
  article-title: Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01054.x
– volume: 355
  start-page: 2533
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib23
  article-title: Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498
– volume: 13
  start-page: 146
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib8
  article-title: Malignancy and mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with coeliac disease or “gluten sensitivity.”
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i1.146
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1790
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib12
  article-title: Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40176.x
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1593
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib19
  article-title: Gastric foveolar metaplasia and gastric heterotopia in the duodenum: no evidence of an etiologic role for Helicobacter pylori
  publication-title: Hum Pathol
  doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.04.010
– volume: 42
  start-page: 485
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib18
  article-title: The diagnostic value of the duodenal biopsy: a clinico-pathologic analysis of 28,000 patients
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.11.010
– volume: 104
  start-page: 774
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib20
  article-title: Optimal approach to obtaining mucosal biopsies for assessment of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1082
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib14
  article-title: How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease?
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.015
– volume: 357
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib1
  article-title: Celiac disease
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071600
– volume: 139
  start-page: 1894
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib25
  article-title: A national study of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.018
– volume: 329
  start-page: 716
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib6
  article-title: Malignancy and mortality in people with coeliac disease: population based cohort study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.38169.486701.7C
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1185
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236_bib17
  article-title: The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1097/00042737-199910000-00019
– reference: 12578508 - Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):286-92
– reference: 18058655 - Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):219-24
– reference: 16627018 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jun;38(6):374-80
– reference: 17167136 - N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41
– reference: 15330920 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1790-4
– reference: 2744350 - Gastroenterology. 1989 Aug;97(2):265-71
– reference: 19755695 - JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1171-8
– reference: 20727889 - Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1894-1901.e2; quiz e12
– reference: 1727768 - Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):330-54
– reference: 12404215 - Gastroenterology. 2002 Nov;123(5):1428-35
– reference: 17206762 - World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 7;13(1):146-51
– reference: 17087937 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Dec;131(6):1981-2002
– reference: 12935825 - Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):191-5
– reference: 15269095 - BMJ. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):716-9
– reference: 17960014 - N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1731-43
– reference: 20801288 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):569-71
– reference: 19209164 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):774-83
– reference: 20036203 - Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jul;42(7):485-9
– reference: 19240699 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50
– reference: 10524652 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Oct;11(10):1185-94
– reference: 19268726 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;7(7):736-42; quiz 710
– reference: 15017513 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Jan;1(1):19-27
– reference: 17222317 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;102(4):856-61
– reference: 20200428 - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):738-45
– reference: 20656325 - Hum Pathol. 2010 Nov;41(11):1593-600
– reference: 15379837 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Oct 1;20(7):769-75
– reference: 18308317 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1082-7
SSID ssj0008231
Score 2.3895843
Snippet Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during duodenal...
Background Celiac disease (CD) is common but underdiagnosed in the United States. A proposed quality guideline recommends that ≥4 specimens be submitted during...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 103
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Celiac Disease - pathology
Cohort Studies
Digestive system. Abdomen
Duodenum - pathology
Endoscopy
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Retrospective Studies
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
United States
Title Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0016510711015136
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0016510711015136
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1236
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601201
https://www.proquest.com/docview/874018106
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3651876
Volume 74
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEB5CCqVQSt9VH0aH3ooSSSutpKMJDW5Lcmogt2UfmkSlyKayD73kt2dGu3LqNk2h-CAj7WBm9O3MrOcF8N4VFQGh0kmVGZ0UjTOJwczwC7FW1jJ1yBHdk1O5OCs-n5fne3A01cJwWmXQ_V6nj9o63DkM0jxcdR3X-GaSEFWRASOzJbjtdlFUjPKDq5s0Dw5zeW0sE14dCmd8jtdF14YunuKA25D8zTg9XOmBRIZ-1sVtzujvOZW_GKnjx_AoeJfx3DPwBPba_incPwnx82cwn7tLX98Xr5ex6Zar4Wd8seFWV5z-Hnc9O5EDfbN0R9s4xG_oOmbkdcNzODv--PVokYQhCoktm3SdlAatQUeOCzalIe8s1VboHLGxQlqNls4bxvIQdIE2s9qVmKMrbZ0bpI8RL2C_X_btK4hlZqTFwrm6dQWSURM1akTZ6EpoiTqCbJKesqHDOA-6-K6mVLJviiSuWOIqFYolHsGHLc3K99e4c7WYXoqaKkdJ1ylS_3dSVbdRtUPYroPK1JCrVP0BqQjKLeUOKv_5i7MdxGxZywuRV3SGjSCeIKRoP3OQRvftcjOocURiTQf1CF56RN0QZ5JLnTPiZwdr2wXcKnz3Sd9dji3DBbFFdu_1f_LzBh74_9I5Tfkt7K9_bNp35IytzWzcbTO4N__0ZXF6Db4qNOY
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3LbtRAzCpbCZAQ4k14lBy4odAkk0yS46qi2tLunlqpt9E84jYIZVdk98DfY28mgYVSJJRDoslYkT0e2xO_AN67rCBGKHRUJEZHWeVMZDAxvCDWylLGDtmjO1_I2UX2-TK_3IOjIReGwyq97O9l-lZa-5FDT83DVdNwjm8iiaMKUmCktoS8A_tcnSqfwP705HS2GAUye7p6gSwjBvC5M32Y11VT-0Ke4iNXIvmbfnqw0h1RDft2FzfZo7-HVf6ip44fwUNvYIbTHofHsFe3T-Du3LvQn8J06q77FL9wvQxNs1x138OrDVe74gj4sGnZjuzoydKItqF34dB9G5TXdM_g4vjT-dEs8n0UIptX8TrKDVqDjmwXrHJDBlqsrdApYmWFtBotHTmM5T7oAm1itcsxRZfbMjVIlxHPYdIu2_olhDIx0mLmXFm7DEmviRI1oqx0IbREHUAyUE9ZX2Sce118VUM02RdFFFdMcRULxRQP4MMIs-pLbNw6WwyLoobkURJ3ijTArVDFTVB153dspxLVpSpWf3BVAPkIucOY__ziwQ7HjKilmUgLOsYGEA4spGhLs59Gt_Vy06ltl8SSzuoBvOg56idwIjnbOSF8dnhtnMDVwnfftM31tmq4ILRI9b36T3zewb3Z-fxMnZ0sTl_D_f7XOkctv4HJ-tumfku22doc-L33AzP4N5c
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence+to+biopsy+guidelines+increases+celiac+disease+diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal+endoscopy&rft.au=LEBWOHL%2C+Benjamin&rft.au=KAPEL%2C+Robert+C&rft.au=NEUGUT%2C+Alfred+I&rft.au=GREEN%2C+Peter+H.+R&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.gie.2011.03.1236&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=24327144
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00165107%2FS0016510711X0007X%2Fcov150h.gif