The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review
What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of physiotherapy Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 93 - 99 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.06.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?
Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.
Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.
Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.
Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.
The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99] |
---|---|
AbstractList | What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?
Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.
Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.
Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.
Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.
The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99] QuestionsWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. ParticipantsAny clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Outcome measuresRelative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. ResultsEleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. ConclusionThe Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99] What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?QUESTIONSWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.DESIGNSystematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.PARTICIPANTSAny clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.OUTCOME MEASURESRelative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.RESULTSEleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance.CONCLUSIONThe Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. |
Author | Chiarelli, Pauline Marquez, Jodie Downs, Stephen |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Stephen surname: Downs fullname: Downs, Stephen email: Stephen.downs@ncahs.health.nsw.gov.au organization: Transitional Aged Care, Bellingen Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Jodie surname: Marquez fullname: Marquez, Jodie organization: Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Newcastle Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Pauline surname: Chiarelli fullname: Chiarelli, Pauline organization: Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Newcastle Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkcFu1DAQhi1UREvpI4B8bA-hmTixExBFtKKAVIlDy9kaO5OuSzYptlO0b8Bj4-xukaiEig_2yJ7_G8_8z9nOMA7E2EvIX0MO8vgSaiGzpqrEIYgjla4ga56wve21hJ0_cSV22UEIN3laoqhlWT5ju4WQUqim3GO_rhbET8lf81PscbDELy32xBcY-MJdL7gboseM49DOIfnMY9q5p96hcb2LK26myNGEsZ8i_fVwh95R4Gj9GAKPqVKY4W848rAKkZYYnU2KO0c_X7CnHfaBDrbnPvt2_vHq7HN28fXTl7MPF5mtahUzwrpRUgAa7KTMC6sqQqtybGphUIEt6ropQHStlVCa0ijbUgGyVNC1xoDYZ4cb7q0ff0wUol66YKlPzdM4BQ2iyutGKNGk1Ffb1MksqdW33i3Rr_T99FLC203CukFPnbYupp7GeWau15Dr2S69tkvPXiS8XtulZ3z1QH1f4DHd-42O0pjS6LwO1lGyrnWebNTt6B4lnDwg2N4NLnnznVYUbsbJD8kDDToUOt9AZgaINWEGvPs34D8-8Bu0otWt |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2023_2234027 crossref_primary_10_1097_TGR_0000000000000243 crossref_primary_10_1080_02703181_2022_2096745 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eqre_2025_100023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physio_2018_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1590_1980_5918_030_003_ao10 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12010035 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11111377 crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzz003 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12883_022_02843_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2018_11_027 crossref_primary_10_1177_23969873231220218 crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_4_509 crossref_primary_10_2196_18415 crossref_primary_10_61186_armaghanj_29_4_542 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151265 crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzaa042 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_023_01215_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbmt_2021_07_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13121640 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12081058 crossref_primary_10_1123_japa_2016_0132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctim_2021_102745 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_09602011_2024_2343155 crossref_primary_10_1177_1352458517721354 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000027451 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_15964 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijptr_ijptr_155_22 crossref_primary_10_3138_ptc_2019_0095 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134383 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_023_02674_7 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijptr_ijptr_78_23 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_019_09570_z crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzae014 crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155241262871 crossref_primary_10_4103_jsip_jsip_1_21 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_1053065 crossref_primary_10_3109_09593985_2016_1138347 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2016_10_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctcp_2018_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1177_00315125231199662 crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_191784 crossref_primary_10_1177_03080226231192368 crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_4_488 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11233092 crossref_primary_10_1080_21679169_2019_1573921 crossref_primary_10_11124_01938924_201311120_00009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msard_2022_104430 crossref_primary_10_1111_jar_12531 crossref_primary_10_1177_0269215517733114 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2015_008321 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_020_06029_x crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283394 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1451180 crossref_primary_10_1186_s11556_022_00290_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2022_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_21073_y crossref_primary_10_2466_25_15_PMS_118k17w6 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19095058 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9103115 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm13081257 crossref_primary_10_1097_MRR_0000000000000635 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_parkreldis_2022_105231 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2016_1183822 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14080834 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2018_11_001 crossref_primary_10_61186_shefa_12_3_1 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_826898 crossref_primary_10_1097_PEP_0000000000000521 crossref_primary_10_3390_life12060882 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11030338 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2014_08_025 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_15275 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12883_024_03819_5 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1329_2024_03011 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjstel_2021_000867 crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2017_12_3_49 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e20663 crossref_primary_10_61186_shefa_12_2_42 crossref_primary_10_18857_jkpt_2024_36_4_115 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2020_1805833 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11020176 crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_13415 crossref_primary_10_52965_001c_116960 crossref_primary_10_5172_conu_2014_5231 crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2021_16_2_71 crossref_primary_10_2196_29830 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2020_06_017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_017_2579_5 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_074508 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13020225 crossref_primary_10_2147_DMSO_S235015 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_3410_20_03977_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19042346 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13081213 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219519417400218 crossref_primary_10_1136_thoraxjnl_2019_213608 crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_206007 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_720677 crossref_primary_10_1080_21679169_2017_1414304 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbmt_2024_10_059 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2022_2137384 crossref_primary_10_1097_JTE_0000000000000194 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_06_021 crossref_primary_10_3390_s20226488 crossref_primary_10_54393_tt_v2i1_10 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_2629 crossref_primary_10_1080_01616412_2024_2359260 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_171473 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_10_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2013_12_013 crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2023_12_4_404 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2023_2286635 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11082228 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41999_023_00905_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_019_1147_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2020_101117 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare7010027 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_132762_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155251318560 crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002530 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2016_1276971 crossref_primary_10_1080_10833196_2020_1784571 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11081109 crossref_primary_10_3390_sports7030055 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_013_0144_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022117 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_13901 crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_24_08307_2 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210195 crossref_primary_10_15406_jnsk_2015_03_00089 crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_223536 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2023_1040277 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afae214 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038291 crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_20_06550_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13010092 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151291 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151292 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_024_00678_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1355104 crossref_primary_10_1097_NPT_0000000000000229 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210307 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1250299 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13102873 crossref_primary_10_1177_1471301216663012 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_568841 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2688003 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4118187 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2020_04_023 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17186488 crossref_primary_10_1177_10538135251313716 crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000002390 crossref_primary_10_1177_2055207619885573 crossref_primary_10_1097_JAT_0000000000000045 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12121694 crossref_primary_10_1080_02703181_2019_1709601 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archger_2020_104060 crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2016_1176256 crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_22_07510_4 crossref_primary_10_31616_asj_2019_0013 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40634_022_00459_x crossref_primary_10_3233_BMR_150335 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD010760_pub2 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9020609 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2020_615861 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2023_2232717 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_860762 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1329_2024_02004 crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210094 crossref_primary_10_3390_life13051169 crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afac175 |
Cites_doi | 10.2340/1650197719952736 10.2522/ptj.20070205 10.1080/09638280701400698 10.1002/pri.30 10.2340/16501977-0337 10.1177/1545968309341059 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E 10.1080/09638280701191859 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60296-8 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 10.2522/ptj.20070214 10.2522/ptj.20060343 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01295.x 10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association Australian Physiotherapy Association Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association – notice: Australian Physiotherapy Association – notice: Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved. |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 1836-9561 |
EndPage | 99 |
ExternalDocumentID | 23663794 10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9 S1836955313701619 1_s2_0_S1836955313701619 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .FO 0R~ 1P~ 3EH 4.4 457 53G 5RS 5VS 8R4 8R5 AABSN AAEDT AAEDW AAFWJ AAIKJ AAKAS AAKDD AALRI AAWTL AAXUO AAYWO ABJNI ABMAC ACGFO ACGFS ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADVLN ADZCM AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFPKN AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGHFR AHMBA AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ARTTT BAWUL BCNDV COPKO DIK DXH EAZ EBS EJD EX3 F5P FAFAN FDB GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ HZ~ IHR IPNFZ IXB KQ8 KTM M41 O9- OH. OT. OVD PQQKQ Q2X RIG ROL SES SJN SSZ TEORI WOW XH2 Z5R 0SF AACTN AFCTW NCXOZ OK1 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-ea897631abaf6602c75eac70a983ba71c2889213fdc614b4b7cde216471fdbb13 |
IEDL.DBID | IXB |
ISSN | 1836-9553 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:52:33 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 12 03:52:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:02:41 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:33:28 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:44 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:34:44 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Meta-Analysis Reproducibility of Results Postural Balance |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c587t-ea897631abaf6602c75eac70a983ba71c2889213fdc614b4b7cde216471fdbb13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955313701619 |
PMID | 23663794 |
PQID | 1350893739 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1350893739 pubmed_primary_23663794 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1836955313701619 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2013 text: 2013-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | Journal of physiotherapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Physiother |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | Bland, Altman (bib0015) 1986; 327 Paltamaa, West, Sarasoja, Wilkstrom, Malkia (bib0070) 2005; 10 Steffen, Seney (bib0080) 2008; 88 Mao, Hsueh, Tang, Sheu, Hsieh (bib0065) 2002; 33 Lim, van Wegen, de Goede, Jones, Rochester, Hetherington (bib0060) 2005; 11 Berg, Wood-Dauphine, Williams, Gayton (bib0010) 1989; 41 Cattaneo, Jonsdottir, Repetti (bib0025) 2007; 29 Downs, Marquez, Chiarelli (bib0040) 2012; 20 Stevenson (bib0085) 2001; 47 Berg, Wood-Dauphine, Williams (bib0005) 1995; 27 Blum, Korner-Bitensky (bib0020) 2008; 88 Conradsson, Lundin-Olsson, Lindelof, Littbrand, Malmqvist, Gustafson (bib0030) 2007; 87 Donoghue, Murphy, Jennings, McAuliffe, O’Neil, Charthaigh (bib0035) 2009; 41 Everitt (bib0045) 2010 Folstein, Folstein, McHugh (bib0050) 1975; 12 Shrout, Fleiss (bib0075) 1979; 86 Walter, Eliasziw, Donner (bib0090) 1998; 17 Liaw, Hsieh, Lo, Chen, Lee, Lin (bib0055) 2008; 30 Wirz, Muller, Bastiaenen C (bib0095) 2010; 24 Walter (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0090) 1998; 17 Conradsson (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0030) 2007; 87 Folstein (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0050) 1975; 12 Donoghue (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0035) 2009; 41 Mao (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0065) 2002; 33 Wirz (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0095) 2010; 24 Blum (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0020) 2008; 88 Berg (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0010) 1989; 41 Liaw (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0055) 2008; 30 Everitt (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0045) 2010 Bland (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0015) 1986; 327 Downs (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0040) 2012; 20 Steffen (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0080) 2008; 88 Paltamaa (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0070) 2005; 10 Cattaneo (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0025) 2007; 29 Stevenson (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0085) 2001; 47 Berg (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0005) 1995; 27 Lim (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0060) 2005; 11 Shrout (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0075) 1979; 86 |
References_xml | – volume: 10 start-page: 93 year: 2005 end-page: 109 ident: bib0070 article-title: Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS publication-title: Physiotherapy Research International – volume: 11 start-page: 19 year: 2005 end-page: 24 ident: bib0060 article-title: Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study publication-title: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders – volume: 33 start-page: 1022 year: 2002 end-page: 1027 ident: bib0065 article-title: Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients publication-title: Stroke – volume: 27 start-page: 27 year: 1995 end-page: 36 ident: bib0005 article-title: The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – volume: 88 start-page: 559 year: 2008 end-page: 566 ident: bib0020 article-title: Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review publication-title: Physical Therapy – volume: 86 start-page: 420 year: 1979 end-page: 428 ident: bib0075 article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychological Bulletin – year: 2010 ident: bib0045 article-title: The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics – volume: 41 start-page: 343 year: 2009 end-page: 346 ident: bib0035 article-title: How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people publication-title: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine – volume: 87 start-page: 1155 year: 2007 end-page: 1163 ident: bib0030 article-title: Berg Balance Scale: intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities publication-title: Physical Therapy – volume: 24 start-page: 70 year: 2010 end-page: 77 ident: bib0095 article-title: Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale publication-title: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair – volume: 20 start-page: 275 year: 2012 end-page: 280 ident: bib0040 article-title: Balance outcomes from two small rural hospitals publication-title: Australian Journal of Rural Health – volume: 327 start-page: 307 year: 1986 end-page: 310 ident: bib0015 article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement publication-title: Lancet – volume: 29 start-page: 1920 year: 2007 end-page: 1925 ident: bib0025 article-title: Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation – volume: 12 start-page: 189 year: 1975 end-page: 198 ident: bib0050 article-title: ‘Mini Mental State’ A practical method of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician publication-title: Journal of Psychiatric Research – volume: 30 start-page: 656 year: 2008 end-page: 661 ident: bib0055 article-title: The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation – volume: 88 start-page: 733 year: 2008 end-page: 746 ident: bib0080 article-title: Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and, ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism publication-title: Physical Therapy – volume: 41 start-page: 304 year: 1989 end-page: 311 ident: bib0010 article-title: Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument publication-title: Physiotherapy Canada – volume: 17 start-page: 101 year: 1998 end-page: 110 ident: bib0090 article-title: Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies publication-title: Statistics in Medicine – volume: 47 start-page: 29 year: 2001 end-page: 38 ident: bib0085 article-title: Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale publication-title: Australian Journal of Physiotherapy – volume: 27 start-page: 27 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0005 article-title: The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine doi: 10.2340/1650197719952736 – volume: 88 start-page: 559 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0020 article-title: Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review publication-title: Physical Therapy doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205 – volume: 30 start-page: 656 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0055 article-title: The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation doi: 10.1080/09638280701400698 – volume: 10 start-page: 93 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0070 article-title: Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS publication-title: Physiotherapy Research International doi: 10.1002/pri.30 – volume: 41 start-page: 343 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0035 article-title: How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people publication-title: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine doi: 10.2340/16501977-0337 – volume: 24 start-page: 70 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0095 article-title: Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale publication-title: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968309341059 – volume: 12 start-page: 189 year: 1975 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0050 article-title: ‘Mini Mental State’ A practical method of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician publication-title: Journal of Psychiatric Research doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 – volume: 17 start-page: 101 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0090 article-title: Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies publication-title: Statistics in Medicine doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E – volume: 29 start-page: 1920 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0025 article-title: Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation doi: 10.1080/09638280701191859 – volume: 41 start-page: 304 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0010 article-title: Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument publication-title: Physiotherapy Canada doi: 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304 – volume: 11 start-page: 19 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0060 article-title: Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study publication-title: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003 – volume: 47 start-page: 29 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0085 article-title: Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale publication-title: Australian Journal of Physiotherapy doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60296-8 – volume: 86 start-page: 420 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0075 article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 – volume: 327 start-page: 307 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0015 article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 – volume: 88 start-page: 733 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0080 article-title: Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and, ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism publication-title: Physical Therapy doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070214 – volume: 87 start-page: 1155 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0030 article-title: Berg Balance Scale: intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities publication-title: Physical Therapy doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060343 – volume: 20 start-page: 275 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0040 article-title: Balance outcomes from two small rural hospitals publication-title: Australian Journal of Rural Health doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01295.x – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0045 – volume: 33 start-page: 1022 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0065 article-title: Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5 |
SSID | ssj0000328644 |
Score | 2.4402058 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the... QuestionsWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale?... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 93 |
SubjectTerms | Disability Evaluation Humans Meta-Analysis Observer Variation Other Physical Therapy Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation Physical Therapy Modalities - standards Postural Balance Reproducibility of Results |
Title | The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1836955313701619 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1836955313701619 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663794 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1350893739 |
Volume | 59 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELWqcuECtHwttKtB4gAHs3EcJw63bkVVUYEQbcXeLNtxykpVWiW7lfoP-NmM7SRVBVURN8vx2IlnPH6xPc-EvOWZM7qwnOZVLmhmjN8klCVF8IuDCQ2kDksDX77mh6fZ54VYbJD9IRbGH6vsfX_06cFb9zmzvjdnl8vl7BiNMS8F2hAvPG7xQXw8kyGIbzEf11k8X1we7nT15akXuAnkiZWEzHeMvw_10PKuKeouCBqmooMn5FGPIWEvvuYW2XDNNnn8re9xOIlEAU_JL0zB3LVnMPcHGK2DY3zu4KfuwNMUw9Kv7FLQTeWTrqWeN6KF1p0vI333NZj1CrQJBupuPbgKP9mgwzcAwkjofOUfQcMNOzTEyJhn5PTg08n-Ie1vXqBWyGJFnZYIUzjTRtd5nqS2EOigi0SXkqNqmU2lLFPG68ri9G4yU9jKpZ6ajNWVMYw_J5vNReNeEqiSohJW1NIkBqFZJbNa2FKUAoGV4TyZkGzobGV7WnJ_O8a5Gs-feR0pryPFuAo6UuWEfBjFLiMvx30C-aBJNQSdoptUOHPcJ1j8TdB1_WDvFFNdqhL1h0FOiBwlb9n0vzT6ZjA2hePdb-Loxl2ssTGOkBoxJccyL6IVjh2QcsSP6GBf_X_Dr8nDNF74QRO2QzZX7drtIuxamSl5sHf0_cfRNCxbTMMo-w1UniV9 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKOcCFN2V5DhIHOJiN4zixubEV1RbaCqlbaW-W7TiwUpVWyS4S_4Cfzdh5VBVURdwsO2MnnvH4ix_fEPKGZ96awnGal7mgmbVhk1AqiuAXBxMaSBWXBg6P8vlJ9nkplltkd7gLE45V9r6_8-nRW_c50743p-er1fQYjTFXAm2IFwG3qBvkJqKBIsRv2F_OxoWWQBiXx6CuQYAGiYubPF0tMfMt4-9iRVRdNUddhUHjXLR3j9zpQSR87N7zPtny9QNy92vf5bDomAIekl-YgplvvsEsnGB0Ho6x3MN300LgKYZVWNqlYOoyJH1DA3FEA40_XXX83T_BbtZgbLRQf6ngR_zLBhO_ARBHQhsq_wAGLuihobsa84ic7H1a7M5pH3qBOiGLNfVGIk7hzFhT5XmSukKghy4SoyRH3TKXSqlSxqvS4fxuM1u40qeBm4xVpbWMPybb9VntnxAok6IUTlTSJhaxWSmzSjgllEBkZTlPJiQbOlu7npc8hMc41eMBtKAjHXSkGddRR1pNyPtR7Lwj5rhOIB80qYdbp-gnNU4d1wkWfxP0bT_aW810m-pE_2GREyJHyUtG_S-Nvh6MTeOAD7s4pvZnG2yMI6ZGUMnxmZ3OCscOSDkCSPSwT_-_4Vfk1nxxeKAP9o--PCO30y76B03Yc7K9bjb-BWKwtX0Zx9hv9YwmBA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Berg+Balance+Scale+has+high+intra-+and+inter-rater+reliability+but+absolute+reliability+varies+across+the+scale%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+physiotherapy&rft.au=Downs%2C+Stephen&rft.au=Marquez%2C+Jodie&rft.au=Chiarelli%2C+Pauline&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=1836-9553&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=99&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS1836-9553%2813%2970161-9&rft.externalDocID=S1836955313701619 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F18369553%2FS1836955313X70109%2Fcov150h.gif |