The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review

What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of physiotherapy Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 93 - 99
Main Authors Downs, Stephen, Marquez, Jodie, Chiarelli, Pauline
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.06.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99]
AbstractList What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99]
QuestionsWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. ParticipantsAny clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Outcome measuresRelative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. ResultsEleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. ConclusionThe Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance. [Downs S, Marquez J, Chiarelli P (2013) The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.Journal of Physiotherapy59: 93–99]
What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale? Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies. Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale. Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability. Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56. The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance.
What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?QUESTIONSWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale vary across the scale?Systematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.DESIGNSystematic review with meta-analysis of reliability studies.Any clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.PARTICIPANTSAny clinical population that has undergone assessment with the Berg Balance Scale.Relative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.OUTCOME MEASURESRelative intra-rater reliability, relative inter-rater reliability, and absolute reliability.Eleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.RESULTSEleven studies involving 668 participants were included in the review. The relative intrarater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale was high, with a pooled estimate of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). Relative inter-rater reliability was also high, with a pooled estimate of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.98). A ceiling effect of the Berg Balance Scale was evident for some participants. In the analysis of absolute reliability, all of the relevant studies had an average score of 20 or above on the 0 to 56 point Berg Balance Scale. The absolute reliability across this part of the scale, as measured by the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence, varied between 2.8 points and 6.6 points. The Berg Balance Scale has a higher absolute reliability when close to 56 points due to the ceiling effect. We identified no data that estimated the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among participants with a mean score below 20 out of 56.The Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance.CONCLUSIONThe Berg Balance Scale has acceptable reliability, although it might not detect modest, clinically important changes in balance in individual subjects. The review was only able to comment on the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale among people with moderately poor to normal balance.
Author Chiarelli, Pauline
Marquez, Jodie
Downs, Stephen
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Stephen
  surname: Downs
  fullname: Downs, Stephen
  email: Stephen.downs@ncahs.health.nsw.gov.au
  organization: Transitional Aged Care, Bellingen Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jodie
  surname: Marquez
  fullname: Marquez, Jodie
  organization: Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Newcastle Australia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Pauline
  surname: Chiarelli
  fullname: Chiarelli, Pauline
  organization: Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Newcastle Australia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkcFu1DAQhi1UREvpI4B8bA-hmTixExBFtKKAVIlDy9kaO5OuSzYptlO0b8Bj4-xukaiEig_2yJ7_G8_8z9nOMA7E2EvIX0MO8vgSaiGzpqrEIYgjla4ga56wve21hJ0_cSV22UEIN3laoqhlWT5ju4WQUqim3GO_rhbET8lf81PscbDELy32xBcY-MJdL7gboseM49DOIfnMY9q5p96hcb2LK26myNGEsZ8i_fVwh95R4Gj9GAKPqVKY4W848rAKkZYYnU2KO0c_X7CnHfaBDrbnPvt2_vHq7HN28fXTl7MPF5mtahUzwrpRUgAa7KTMC6sqQqtybGphUIEt6ropQHStlVCa0ijbUgGyVNC1xoDYZ4cb7q0ff0wUol66YKlPzdM4BQ2iyutGKNGk1Ffb1MksqdW33i3Rr_T99FLC203CukFPnbYupp7GeWau15Dr2S69tkvPXiS8XtulZ3z1QH1f4DHd-42O0pjS6LwO1lGyrnWebNTt6B4lnDwg2N4NLnnznVYUbsbJD8kDDToUOt9AZgaINWEGvPs34D8-8Bu0otWt
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2023_2234027
crossref_primary_10_1097_TGR_0000000000000243
crossref_primary_10_1080_02703181_2022_2096745
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eqre_2025_100023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physio_2018_07_014
crossref_primary_10_1590_1980_5918_030_003_ao10
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12010035
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11111377
crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzz003
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12883_022_02843_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2018_11_027
crossref_primary_10_1177_23969873231220218
crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_4_509
crossref_primary_10_2196_18415
crossref_primary_10_61186_armaghanj_29_4_542
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151265
crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzaa042
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_023_01215_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbmt_2021_07_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13121640
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12081058
crossref_primary_10_1123_japa_2016_0132
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctim_2021_102745
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_09602011_2024_2343155
crossref_primary_10_1177_1352458517721354
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000027451
crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_15964
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijptr_ijptr_155_22
crossref_primary_10_3138_ptc_2019_0095
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134383
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_023_02674_7
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijptr_ijptr_78_23
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_019_09570_z
crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzae014
crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155241262871
crossref_primary_10_4103_jsip_jsip_1_21
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2022_1053065
crossref_primary_10_3109_09593985_2016_1138347
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2016_10_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctcp_2018_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1177_00315125231199662
crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_191784
crossref_primary_10_1177_03080226231192368
crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2022_11_4_488
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11233092
crossref_primary_10_1080_21679169_2019_1573921
crossref_primary_10_11124_01938924_201311120_00009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msard_2022_104430
crossref_primary_10_1111_jar_12531
crossref_primary_10_1177_0269215517733114
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2015_008321
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_020_06029_x
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0283394
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1451180
crossref_primary_10_1186_s11556_022_00290_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2022_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_21073_y
crossref_primary_10_2466_25_15_PMS_118k17w6
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19095058
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9103115
crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm13081257
crossref_primary_10_1097_MRR_0000000000000635
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_parkreldis_2022_105231
crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2016_1183822
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14080834
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2018_11_001
crossref_primary_10_61186_shefa_12_3_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_826898
crossref_primary_10_1097_PEP_0000000000000521
crossref_primary_10_3390_life12060882
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci11030338
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2014_08_025
crossref_primary_10_1111_jgs_15275
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12883_024_03819_5
crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1329_2024_03011
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjstel_2021_000867
crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2017_12_3_49
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e20663
crossref_primary_10_61186_shefa_12_2_42
crossref_primary_10_18857_jkpt_2024_36_4_115
crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2020_1805833
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11020176
crossref_primary_10_1111_sms_13415
crossref_primary_10_52965_001c_116960
crossref_primary_10_5172_conu_2014_5231
crossref_primary_10_13066_kspm_2021_16_2_71
crossref_primary_10_2196_29830
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2020_06_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11060_017_2579_5
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_074508
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13020225
crossref_primary_10_2147_DMSO_S235015
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_3410_20_03977_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19042346
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13081213
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219519417400218
crossref_primary_10_1136_thoraxjnl_2019_213608
crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_206007
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_720677
crossref_primary_10_1080_21679169_2017_1414304
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbmt_2024_10_059
crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2022_2137384
crossref_primary_10_1097_JTE_0000000000000194
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_06_021
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20226488
crossref_primary_10_54393_tt_v2i1_10
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_2629
crossref_primary_10_1080_01616412_2024_2359260
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_171473
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2014_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jphys_2013_12_013
crossref_primary_10_14474_ptrs_2023_12_4_404
crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2023_2286635
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11082228
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41999_023_00905_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_019_1147_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2020_101117
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare7010027
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_132762_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155251318560
crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002530
crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2016_1276971
crossref_primary_10_1080_10833196_2020_1784571
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11081109
crossref_primary_10_3390_sports7030055
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40520_013_0144_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022117
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_13901
crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_24_08307_2
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210195
crossref_primary_10_15406_jnsk_2015_03_00089
crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_223536
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2023_1040277
crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afae214
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038291
crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_20_06550_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13010092
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151291
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_151292
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41531_024_00678_2
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1355104
crossref_primary_10_1097_NPT_0000000000000229
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210307
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1250299
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13102873
crossref_primary_10_1177_1471301216663012
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_568841
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2688003
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4118187
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2020_04_023
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17186488
crossref_primary_10_1177_10538135251313716
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000002390
crossref_primary_10_1177_2055207619885573
crossref_primary_10_1097_JAT_0000000000000045
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12121694
crossref_primary_10_1080_02703181_2019_1709601
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archger_2020_104060
crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2016_1176256
crossref_primary_10_23736_S1973_9087_22_07510_4
crossref_primary_10_31616_asj_2019_0013
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40634_022_00459_x
crossref_primary_10_3233_BMR_150335
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD010760_pub2
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9020609
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2020_615861
crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2023_2232717
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_860762
crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1329_2024_02004
crossref_primary_10_3233_NRE_210094
crossref_primary_10_3390_life13051169
crossref_primary_10_1093_ageing_afac175
Cites_doi 10.2340/1650197719952736
10.2522/ptj.20070205
10.1080/09638280701400698
10.1002/pri.30
10.2340/16501977-0337
10.1177/1545968309341059
10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E
10.1080/09638280701191859
10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003
10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60296-8
10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
10.2522/ptj.20070214
10.2522/ptj.20060343
10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01295.x
10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association
Australian Physiotherapy Association
Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association
– notice: Australian Physiotherapy Association
– notice: Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physical Therapy
EISSN 1836-9561
EndPage 99
ExternalDocumentID 23663794
10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9
S1836955313701619
1_s2_0_S1836955313701619
Genre Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
0R~
1P~
3EH
4.4
457
53G
5RS
5VS
8R4
8R5
AABSN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKAS
AAKDD
AALRI
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADVLN
ADZCM
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFPKN
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGHFR
AHMBA
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ARTTT
BAWUL
BCNDV
COPKO
DIK
DXH
EAZ
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FAFAN
FDB
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HZ~
IHR
IPNFZ
IXB
KQ8
KTM
M41
O9-
OH.
OT.
OVD
PQQKQ
Q2X
RIG
ROL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
WOW
XH2
Z5R
0SF
AACTN
AFCTW
NCXOZ
OK1
6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-ea897631abaf6602c75eac70a983ba71c2889213fdc614b4b7cde216471fdbb13
IEDL.DBID IXB
ISSN 1836-9553
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 05:52:33 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 12 03:52:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:02:41 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:33:28 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:44 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:34:44 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Meta-Analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Postural Balance
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2013 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c587t-ea897631abaf6602c75eac70a983ba71c2889213fdc614b4b7cde216471fdbb13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955313701619
PMID 23663794
PQID 1350893739
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1350893739
pubmed_primary_23663794
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1836955313701619
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_S1836_9553_13_70161_9
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Journal of physiotherapy
PublicationTitleAlternate J Physiother
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Bland, Altman (bib0015) 1986; 327
Paltamaa, West, Sarasoja, Wilkstrom, Malkia (bib0070) 2005; 10
Steffen, Seney (bib0080) 2008; 88
Mao, Hsueh, Tang, Sheu, Hsieh (bib0065) 2002; 33
Lim, van Wegen, de Goede, Jones, Rochester, Hetherington (bib0060) 2005; 11
Berg, Wood-Dauphine, Williams, Gayton (bib0010) 1989; 41
Cattaneo, Jonsdottir, Repetti (bib0025) 2007; 29
Downs, Marquez, Chiarelli (bib0040) 2012; 20
Stevenson (bib0085) 2001; 47
Berg, Wood-Dauphine, Williams (bib0005) 1995; 27
Blum, Korner-Bitensky (bib0020) 2008; 88
Conradsson, Lundin-Olsson, Lindelof, Littbrand, Malmqvist, Gustafson (bib0030) 2007; 87
Donoghue, Murphy, Jennings, McAuliffe, O’Neil, Charthaigh (bib0035) 2009; 41
Everitt (bib0045) 2010
Folstein, Folstein, McHugh (bib0050) 1975; 12
Shrout, Fleiss (bib0075) 1979; 86
Walter, Eliasziw, Donner (bib0090) 1998; 17
Liaw, Hsieh, Lo, Chen, Lee, Lin (bib0055) 2008; 30
Wirz, Muller, Bastiaenen C (bib0095) 2010; 24
Walter (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0090) 1998; 17
Conradsson (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0030) 2007; 87
Folstein (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0050) 1975; 12
Donoghue (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0035) 2009; 41
Mao (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0065) 2002; 33
Wirz (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0095) 2010; 24
Blum (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0020) 2008; 88
Berg (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0010) 1989; 41
Liaw (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0055) 2008; 30
Everitt (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0045) 2010
Bland (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0015) 1986; 327
Downs (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0040) 2012; 20
Steffen (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0080) 2008; 88
Paltamaa (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0070) 2005; 10
Cattaneo (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0025) 2007; 29
Stevenson (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0085) 2001; 47
Berg (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0005) 1995; 27
Lim (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0060) 2005; 11
Shrout (10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0075) 1979; 86
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 93
  year: 2005
  end-page: 109
  ident: bib0070
  article-title: Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS
  publication-title: Physiotherapy Research International
– volume: 11
  start-page: 19
  year: 2005
  end-page: 24
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study
  publication-title: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1022
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1027
  ident: bib0065
  article-title: Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 27
  start-page: 27
  year: 1995
  end-page: 36
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke
  publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
– volume: 88
  start-page: 559
  year: 2008
  end-page: 566
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
– volume: 86
  start-page: 420
  year: 1979
  end-page: 428
  ident: bib0075
  article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
– year: 2010
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics
– volume: 41
  start-page: 343
  year: 2009
  end-page: 346
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people
  publication-title: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1155
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1163
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Berg Balance Scale: intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
– volume: 24
  start-page: 70
  year: 2010
  end-page: 77
  ident: bib0095
  article-title: Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale
  publication-title: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
– volume: 20
  start-page: 275
  year: 2012
  end-page: 280
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Balance outcomes from two small rural hospitals
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Rural Health
– volume: 327
  start-page: 307
  year: 1986
  end-page: 310
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1920
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1925
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis
  publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation
– volume: 12
  start-page: 189
  year: 1975
  end-page: 198
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: ‘Mini Mental State’ A practical method of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatric Research
– volume: 30
  start-page: 656
  year: 2008
  end-page: 661
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients
  publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation
– volume: 88
  start-page: 733
  year: 2008
  end-page: 746
  ident: bib0080
  article-title: Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and, ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
– volume: 41
  start-page: 304
  year: 1989
  end-page: 311
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument
  publication-title: Physiotherapy Canada
– volume: 17
  start-page: 101
  year: 1998
  end-page: 110
  ident: bib0090
  article-title: Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– volume: 47
  start-page: 29
  year: 2001
  end-page: 38
  ident: bib0085
  article-title: Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
– volume: 27
  start-page: 27
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0005
  article-title: The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke
  publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  doi: 10.2340/1650197719952736
– volume: 88
  start-page: 559
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0020
  article-title: Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
  doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205
– volume: 30
  start-page: 656
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0055
  article-title: The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients
  publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation
  doi: 10.1080/09638280701400698
– volume: 10
  start-page: 93
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0070
  article-title: Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS
  publication-title: Physiotherapy Research International
  doi: 10.1002/pri.30
– volume: 41
  start-page: 343
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0035
  article-title: How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people
  publication-title: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
  doi: 10.2340/16501977-0337
– volume: 24
  start-page: 70
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0095
  article-title: Falls in persons with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of the Berg Balance Scale
  publication-title: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968309341059
– volume: 12
  start-page: 189
  year: 1975
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0050
  article-title: ‘Mini Mental State’ A practical method of grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
  publication-title: Journal of Psychiatric Research
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
– volume: 17
  start-page: 101
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0090
  article-title: Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1920
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0025
  article-title: Reliability of four scales on balance disorders in persons with multiple sclerosis
  publication-title: Disability and Rehabilitation
  doi: 10.1080/09638280701191859
– volume: 41
  start-page: 304
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0010
  article-title: Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument
  publication-title: Physiotherapy Canada
  doi: 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
– volume: 11
  start-page: 19
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0060
  article-title: Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study
  publication-title: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2004.06.003
– volume: 47
  start-page: 29
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0085
  article-title: Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
  doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60296-8
– volume: 86
  start-page: 420
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0075
  article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability
  publication-title: Psychological Bulletin
  doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
– volume: 327
  start-page: 307
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0015
  article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
– volume: 88
  start-page: 733
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0080
  article-title: Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and, ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
  doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070214
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1155
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0030
  article-title: Berg Balance Scale: intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities
  publication-title: Physical Therapy
  doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060343
– volume: 20
  start-page: 275
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0040
  article-title: Balance outcomes from two small rural hospitals
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Rural Health
  doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01295.x
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0045
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1022
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9_bib0065
  article-title: Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients
  publication-title: Stroke
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000012516.63191.C5
SSID ssj0000328644
Score 2.4402058
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet What is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? Does the...
QuestionsWhat is the intra-rater and inter-rater relative reliability of the Berg Balance Scale? What is the absolute reliability of the Berg Balance Scale?...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 93
SubjectTerms Disability Evaluation
Humans
Meta-Analysis
Observer Variation
Other
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation
Physical Therapy Modalities - standards
Postural Balance
Reproducibility of Results
Title The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1836955313701619
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1836955313701619
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663794
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1350893739
Volume 59
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELWqcuECtHwttKtB4gAHs3EcJw63bkVVUYEQbcXeLNtxykpVWiW7lfoP-NmM7SRVBVURN8vx2IlnPH6xPc-EvOWZM7qwnOZVLmhmjN8klCVF8IuDCQ2kDksDX77mh6fZ54VYbJD9IRbGH6vsfX_06cFb9zmzvjdnl8vl7BiNMS8F2hAvPG7xQXw8kyGIbzEf11k8X1we7nT15akXuAnkiZWEzHeMvw_10PKuKeouCBqmooMn5FGPIWEvvuYW2XDNNnn8re9xOIlEAU_JL0zB3LVnMPcHGK2DY3zu4KfuwNMUw9Kv7FLQTeWTrqWeN6KF1p0vI333NZj1CrQJBupuPbgKP9mgwzcAwkjofOUfQcMNOzTEyJhn5PTg08n-Ie1vXqBWyGJFnZYIUzjTRtd5nqS2EOigi0SXkqNqmU2lLFPG68ri9G4yU9jKpZ6ajNWVMYw_J5vNReNeEqiSohJW1NIkBqFZJbNa2FKUAoGV4TyZkGzobGV7WnJ_O8a5Gs-feR0pryPFuAo6UuWEfBjFLiMvx30C-aBJNQSdoptUOHPcJ1j8TdB1_WDvFFNdqhL1h0FOiBwlb9n0vzT6ZjA2hePdb-Loxl2ssTGOkBoxJccyL6IVjh2QcsSP6GBf_X_Dr8nDNF74QRO2QzZX7drtIuxamSl5sHf0_cfRNCxbTMMo-w1UniV9
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKOcCFN2V5DhIHOJiN4zixubEV1RbaCqlbaW-W7TiwUpVWyS4S_4Cfzdh5VBVURdwsO2MnnvH4ix_fEPKGZ96awnGal7mgmbVhk1AqiuAXBxMaSBWXBg6P8vlJ9nkplltkd7gLE45V9r6_8-nRW_c50743p-er1fQYjTFXAm2IFwG3qBvkJqKBIsRv2F_OxoWWQBiXx6CuQYAGiYubPF0tMfMt4-9iRVRdNUddhUHjXLR3j9zpQSR87N7zPtny9QNy92vf5bDomAIekl-YgplvvsEsnGB0Ho6x3MN300LgKYZVWNqlYOoyJH1DA3FEA40_XXX83T_BbtZgbLRQf6ngR_zLBhO_ARBHQhsq_wAGLuihobsa84ic7H1a7M5pH3qBOiGLNfVGIk7hzFhT5XmSukKghy4SoyRH3TKXSqlSxqvS4fxuM1u40qeBm4xVpbWMPybb9VntnxAok6IUTlTSJhaxWSmzSjgllEBkZTlPJiQbOlu7npc8hMc41eMBtKAjHXSkGddRR1pNyPtR7Lwj5rhOIB80qYdbp-gnNU4d1wkWfxP0bT_aW810m-pE_2GREyJHyUtG_S-Nvh6MTeOAD7s4pvZnG2yMI6ZGUMnxmZ3OCscOSDkCSPSwT_-_4Vfk1nxxeKAP9o--PCO30y76B03Yc7K9bjb-BWKwtX0Zx9hv9YwmBA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Berg+Balance+Scale+has+high+intra-+and+inter-rater+reliability+but+absolute+reliability+varies+across+the+scale%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+physiotherapy&rft.au=Downs%2C+Stephen&rft.au=Marquez%2C+Jodie&rft.au=Chiarelli%2C+Pauline&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=1836-9553&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=99&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS1836-9553%2813%2970161-9&rft.externalDocID=S1836955313701619
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F18369553%2FS1836955313X70109%2Fcov150h.gif