Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old-Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory
Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find r...
Saved in:
Published in | Ecology (Durham) Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 493 - 509 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
The Ecological Society of America
01.03.1995
Ecological Society of America Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important @?baseline@? information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional-scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the @?nutrient retention hypothesis@?) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old-growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO"3 ^- (0.2% of total N) and NH"4^+ (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old-growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long-term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old-growth forests as @?leaky@? vs. @?non-leaky@? with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High- and mid-elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO"3 - reported from any Old-growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 @mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old-growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO"3^- and the relative abundance of NO"3^- vs. NH"4^+ in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old-growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds are presented. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important °baseline° information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional—scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old—growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the °nutrient retention hypothesis°) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old—growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO 3 — (0.2% of total N) and NH 4 + (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old—growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long—term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old—growth forests as °leaky° vs. °non—leaky° with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High— and mid—elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO 3 — reported from any Old—growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old—growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO 3 — and the relative abundance of NO 3 — vs. NH 4 + in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old—growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important "baseline" information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional-scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the "nutrient retention hypothesis") that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old-growth forest ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrologic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO sub(3) super(-) (0.2% of total N) and NH sub(4) super(+) (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old-growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long-term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old-growth forests as "leaky" vs. "non-leaky" with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High- and mid-elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest efflux concentrations of N as NO sub(3) super(-) reported from any old-growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.10 vs. 0.30 mu g/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old-growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO sub(3) super(-) and the relative abundance of NO sub(3) super(-) vs. NH sub(4) super(+) in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional-scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old-growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important °baseline° information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional—scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old—growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the °nutrient retention hypothesis°) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old—growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO3 — (0.2% of total N) and NH4+ (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old—growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long—term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old—growth forests as °leaky° vs. °non—leaky° with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High— and mid—elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO3 — reported from any Old—growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old—growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO3— and the relative abundance of NO3— vs. NH4+ in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old—growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas, While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important "baseline" information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional-scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the "nutrient retention hypothesis") that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old-growth forest ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrologic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] (0.2% of total N) and N[H.sub.[4.sup.+]] (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old-growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long-term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old-growth forests as "leaky" vs. "non-leaky" with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High- and mid-elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest efflux concentrations of N as N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] reported from any old-growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.10 vs. 0.30 [µgram]/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old-growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] and the relative abundance of N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] vs. N[H.sub.[4.sup.+]] in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional-scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old-growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Key words: atmospheric deposition; base cations; biogeochemical theory; biogeochemistry; Chile; nitrogen; nitrogen saturation hypothesis; nutrient cycling; nutrient retention hypothesis; old-growth forests; temperate forest ecosystems; unpolluted conditions; watershed approach. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important °baseline° information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional—scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old—growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the °nutrient retention hypothesis°) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old—growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO₃ — (0.2% of total N) and NH₄ ⁺ (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old—growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long—term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old—growth forests as °leaky° vs. °non—leaky° with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High— and mid—elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO₃ — reported from any Old—growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old—growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO₃ — and the relative abundance of NO₃ — vs. NH₄ ⁺ in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old—growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas. While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important @?baseline@? information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional-scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the @?nutrient retention hypothesis@?) that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old-growth ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrolic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms NO"3 ^- (0.2% of total N) and NH"4^+ (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old-growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long-term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old-growth forests as @?leaky@? vs. @?non-leaky@? with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High- and mid-elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest afflux concentrations of N as NO"3 - reported from any Old-growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.l0 vs. 0.30 @mg/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old-growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of NO"3^- and the relative abundance of NO"3^- vs. NH"4^+ in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old-growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient dynamics in temperate region ecosystems has been derived from such biogeochemically altered areas, While it is increasingly difficult to find regions of temperate forest that can be classified as free from human influences, studies of unpolluted and undisturbed areas can (1) provide important "baseline" information about natural patterns of element cycling, against which disturbed cycles can be compared; (2) provide insights into the biogeochemical conditions that acted as evolutionary and selective constraints on biotic communities before the advent of regional-scale human impacts; and (3) provide an opportunity to evaluate the general nature of biogeochemical theories that have been developed in areas subject to strong human influences. We here report on patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31 watersheds. These forests have not been subject to air pollution inputs and have remained floristically stable throughout the Holocene. For major elements our results support predictions from current biogeochemical theory (the "nutrient retention hypothesis") that net biotic retention of elements should be minimal in old-growth forest ecosystems. Despite the dilute nature of watershed streams, the overall patterns of loss of most elements could be explained almost exclusively by atmospheric inputs of marine aerosols. In contrast, patterns of nitrogen loss were more complex than predicted by current conceptual models. Hydrologic N losses occurred nearly exclusively (95% of total N) as dissolved organic forms of nitrogen (DON), rather than as the inorganic forms N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] (0.2% of total N) and N[H.sub.[4.sup.+]] (4.8% of total N). The strong dominance of organic over inorganic losses of N indicates that losses of N from old-growth forest ecosystems are not exclusively subject to traditional mechanisms of direct biotic control (i.e., mineralization supply or biotic uptake), but are also subject to indirect biotic control associated with the long-term accumulation, humification, and leaching of soil organic N during ecosystem succession. The view of unpolluted old-growth forests as "leaky" vs. "non-leaky" with respect to N depends on whether ecosystem budgets or models consider dissolved organic, as well as inorganic, forms of N. High- and mid-elevation forests in our study area showed the lowest efflux concentrations of N as N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] reported from any old-growth temperate forest ecosystem (0.10 vs. 0.30 [µgram]/L, respectively). Comparisons against other old-growth forests, subject to varying levels of N deposition, indicated that levels of N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] and the relative abundance of N[O.sub.[3.sup.-]] vs. N[H.sub.[4.sup.+]] in Northern Hemisphere forests may be strongly influenced by atmospheric N inputs. Our analyses suggest that patterns of N cycling, as well as evolutionary selective pressures on plant and microbial species, may have changed as a function of regional-scale increases in atmospheric N deposition to European and North American temperate forests. We hypothesize that, because they inherently are more poor than aggrading forests at retaining added nutrients, old-growth forest ecosystems are particularly sensitive indicators of N deposition. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Armesto, Juan J. Johnson, Arthur H. Hedin, Lars O. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lars O. surname: Hedin fullname: Hedin, Lars O. – sequence: 2 givenname: Juan J. surname: Armesto fullname: Armesto, Juan J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Arthur H. surname: Johnson fullname: Johnson, Arthur H. |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3670349$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
BookMark | eNp90k9v0zAYBvAIDYluIL5CBAh2WMCOHf_hNqpuIFWMQ3fgZLmO3bpy7WI7TP32c2nRpLGSHCJFPz16_L4-rU588LqqXkPwsUWAfoIcwxawZ9UIcsQbDik4qUYAwLbhpGMvqtOUVqA8ELNR5X7InHX0qQ6m_j7kaLXP9TSkVJsY1vWt3wTnhqz7i_rG9c11DHd5Wc_0eqOjzLq-ClGnnD7Xk9_SDTLb4HdRX2xY6KCWem2VdPVsqUPcvqyeG-mSfnX4nlW3V5PZ-Gszvbn-Nr6cNqpjGDV9DxUCChNo4FxJTdWcMMoZUIqRXjLDYS-5pNgoNlfIsHk_b3FPOm4gbRVAZ9X5PncTw6-h1BNrm5R2TnodhiQggwDgjiNa6Pv_U0IxoLgr8M0juApD9OUYooWMdwSAtqC3xxBsOcEIkQ4VdbFXC-m0sN6EHKVaaF8m6soyjS2_L8veMAQYF948wcvb74b7lH93KCFTmb2J0iubxCbatYxbgQgFCPOHWBXLtqM2Qtn8Z38l3joBgdjdJ3G4T8V_eOT_Jv4r2728K8W2x5iYjH9CzjtK2tLmofUq5RCPZt8DvmbjSA |
CODEN | ECGYAQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2023_03_082 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_energy_21_1_261 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9558_7 crossref_primary_10_1029_1999GB900014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_0015_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geomorph_2006_07_014 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41559_018_0759_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_016_9984_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geomorph_2006_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2014_11_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2009_07_026 crossref_primary_10_1080_01431160310001619526 crossref_primary_10_3390_insects11020102 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_10 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_0002_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_008_9203_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_3429_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_9984_z crossref_primary_10_1139_x00_045 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2000_6431068x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orggeochem_2024_104877 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agrformet_2017_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1014741821292 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_ad3167 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2013_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2003_013_0616_LUIOTN_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_0358_9 crossref_primary_10_1078_1439_1791_00037 crossref_primary_10_1890_08_1328_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_006_9062_2 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2486_2003_00686_x crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1011_2009_01111 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_1575 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_01_178 crossref_primary_10_1002_rcm_4648 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgrg_20030 crossref_primary_10_1111_fwb_12878 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_1061_1 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1121448109 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_7_2261_2010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2014_04_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_143669 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_017_0127_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejsobi_2017_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2006_10_013 crossref_primary_10_1890_06_0733 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_019_00404_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquabot_2009_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1021_es9603416 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_10_3869_2013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_03_060 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_4107_5 crossref_primary_10_1300_J091v14n01_03 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2001_011_0253_TLTEOL_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_12783 crossref_primary_10_1002_2014GB004995 crossref_primary_10_1029_2005JG000055 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9538_y crossref_primary_10_1016_S0038_0717_99_00187_X crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2009_10_059 crossref_primary_10_1029_2024JG008346 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2004_07_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2020_114090 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2002_012_1027_NTANRA_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_97_00215_6 crossref_primary_10_1890_10_1642_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2015_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_019_09682_3 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2002_1207 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_010_0431_z crossref_primary_10_1029_2005GB002603 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_007_0129_z crossref_primary_10_1002_2016JG003535 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_015_5034_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chnaes_2009_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_1752_1688_12951 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_1997_007_0402_BROFET_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_121729 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_5575 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_1246_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13280_016_0789_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_005_7530_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_00207230701862405 crossref_primary_10_1029_2010GB003779 crossref_primary_10_1175_EI135_1 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2001_011_1817_DFPANA_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_013_9635_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_012_0299_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2007_05_021 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2000_010_0073_NSARIF_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1029_2007GB002957 crossref_primary_10_5194_hess_22_1897_2018 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_019_00584_3 crossref_primary_10_1890_02_4066 crossref_primary_10_1641_0006_3568_2002_052_0693_AGPONR_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2012_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1086_605377 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11368_009_0159_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2021_710574 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_2193 crossref_primary_10_1002_2013JG002588 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_018_4194_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1744_7429_2007_00267_x crossref_primary_10_1086_674907 crossref_primary_10_1038_ngeo252 crossref_primary_10_1029_2006JG000309 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02856838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119312 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_013_9829_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9416_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_011_9627_6 crossref_primary_10_1029_2001GB001823 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_004_1830_y crossref_primary_10_1016_S2095_3119_13_60527_4 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_65_6_2661_2673_1999 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_14129 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_005_0022_9 crossref_primary_10_1029_2006GB002797 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature11818 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_1997_007_0737_HAOTGN_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0169_5347_00_01861_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_2017WR022168 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_1184 crossref_primary_10_1890_04_0415 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2486_2002_00517_x crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1258_2012_00346 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1472_4669_2003_00012_x crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_97 crossref_primary_10_4005_jjfs_90_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2005_10_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2010_01_025 crossref_primary_10_1890_ES11_00168_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_015_2406_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_nplants_2015_64 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_9952_7 crossref_primary_10_5141_JEFB_2006_29_3_305 crossref_primary_10_1002_2015JG002909 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_017_0133_0 crossref_primary_10_1139_x02_183 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_1046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119341 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_1_2016 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecm_1371 crossref_primary_10_1890_07_1379_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_006_0076_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1461_0248_2011_01701_x crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_7128 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0030_1299_2005_14050_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2012_02731_x crossref_primary_10_1002_jpln_200290002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_011_2016_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2007_06_020 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_1688_2008_00251_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2003_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_jpln_201000046 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_011_9572_4 crossref_primary_10_1890_12_2204_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2010_02344_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_007_9340_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_14175 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_19_1527_2022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2020_125295 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1526_100X_1999_72018_x crossref_primary_10_1002__SICI_1099_1085_19980615_12_7_1067__AID_HYP641_3_0_CO_2_O crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_152045499 crossref_primary_10_1890_14_0834_1 crossref_primary_10_1890_09_0274_1 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1442_9993_2003_01315_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2008_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1086_679747 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_006_0564_3 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_9_4513_2012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_04_367 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0269_7491_02_00235_X crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_018_0245_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2013_05_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2013_01_012 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_10_1693_2013 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_1688_2012_00686_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_013_9665_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_007_9019_x crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2002_083_0073_NSACIO_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2008_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_fee_1949 crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_12591 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature00959 crossref_primary_10_3390_w7105345 crossref_primary_10_1139_x96_183 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1654_1103_2002_tb02059_x crossref_primary_10_1029_2021GB006953 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_274_5293_1720 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_023_06244_8 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_ecolsys_102710_145034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_140998 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_ecolsys_110316_022944 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13280_015_0755_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_007_9509_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2009_09_023 crossref_primary_10_1890_07_0303_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11368_008_0044_y crossref_primary_10_1016_S0272_7714_02_00337_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_0370_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_008_9185_8 crossref_primary_10_1002_2016WR020096 crossref_primary_10_1029_2000WR900219 crossref_primary_10_1038_415416a crossref_primary_10_1016_j_proenv_2012_01_193 crossref_primary_10_1191_095968399669823431 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_1357 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2014_05_0205 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01007579 crossref_primary_10_1029_96GB01524 crossref_primary_10_1890_03_5303 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01007577 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01007576 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2389_2001_00396_x crossref_primary_10_1890_03_5421 crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_33062014abb0039 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01007573 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2004_6200 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01007581 crossref_primary_10_3390_su1020104 crossref_primary_10_1029_2008GB003336 crossref_primary_10_1029_1998WR900083 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_13365 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2005_00975_x crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_2787_2016 crossref_primary_10_3159_1095_5674_2007_134_269_COSNFF_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_00_00410_2 crossref_primary_10_1038_17276 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2003_09_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02183038 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02183037 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2486_2003_00592_x crossref_primary_10_1002__SICI_1099_1085_199706_11_7_783__AID_HYP519_3_0_CO_2_U crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_006_0035_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_011_9505_z crossref_primary_10_1029_2006JG000276 crossref_primary_10_1029_2008GB003294 crossref_primary_10_3897_oneeco_3_e22509 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1526_100X_1997_00544_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csr_2019_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02804898 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_4739 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2009_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00992871 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1461_0248_2006_00891_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_015_0153_9 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_13_5395_2016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_024_06991_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_0155_5 crossref_primary_10_1890_13_1840_1 crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_1_381_2015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_006_0399_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2011_11_062 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_98_00382_X crossref_primary_10_1086_595749 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0341_8162_03_00074_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_0361_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_022_00979_9 crossref_primary_10_1029_2002GB001903 crossref_primary_10_1080_03650340310001627667 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_1694_01_00447_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_011_9483_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_006_9036_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_020_00734_y crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1302768110 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_009_0220_x crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1607287113 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2016_05_022 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2006_0205 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0016_7061_00_00085_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jsames_2024_104803 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2009_02917_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2004_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1029_97GB01626 crossref_primary_10_2478_s11756_007_0075_7 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0711411105 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0406427102 crossref_primary_10_5194_gmd_10_2009_2017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2016_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_013_0559_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0216053 crossref_primary_10_1039_C4EM00312H crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2004_0173 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2008_0277 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2011_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_008_9180_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_005_0161_z crossref_primary_10_1080_10962247_2013_804466 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0038_0717_00_00039_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_0021_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gca_2007_06_040 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_4723_5 crossref_primary_10_1890_03_0032 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2000_6431129x crossref_primary_10_1029_2010WR009605 crossref_primary_10_5194_hess_14_223_2010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9421_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_009_9254_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtbi_2008_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_jpln_201600079 crossref_primary_10_1029_2001WR000485 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02179825 crossref_primary_10_1086_719991 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_1998_079_0010_EIONLO_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1029_2007GB003005 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajb2_1221 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2000_081_0088_DOSNAC_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_007_9125_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s40529_015_0106_6 crossref_primary_10_1139_a05_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2015_11_060 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2002_083_2888_SNUFSA_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2008_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1021_es3000189 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_007_9113_3 crossref_primary_10_1890_04_1184 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_004_1627_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_020_00752_w crossref_primary_10_5141_JEFB_2005_28_3_169 crossref_primary_10_1657_1523_0430_07_052__BROWN_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_016_0093_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_4428_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2013_10_052 crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00992909 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_009_9336_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2004_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2004_09_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atmosenv_2022_118997 crossref_primary_10_1890_ES14_00109_1 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_1999_009_0958_MECIAH_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_06_104 crossref_primary_10_1890_03_0351 crossref_primary_10_1029_2004GL021734 crossref_primary_10_1890_06_0031_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2017_09_024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_006_9043_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_eco_107 crossref_primary_10_1086_303304 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_13742 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0071352 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_011_9426_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11676_008_0009_4 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2389_1999_00267_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_006_0004_6 crossref_primary_10_1029_2006WR005286 crossref_primary_10_1029_97GB03657 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2005_12_004 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_6297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2007_04_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2020_106389 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_1998_008_0706_NEINAE_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_17_3511_2020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_012_1174_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_funeco_2019_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1890_13_1418_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_5078 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2022_108154 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_008_1188_6 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_94_16_8280 crossref_primary_10_1029_2023GB007820 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_12_040 crossref_primary_10_1071_MF15286 crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_21_1371_2024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_022_00773_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_009_9348_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_024_01146_y crossref_primary_10_1890_08_0127_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_4107_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_008_9828_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2010_03640_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_003_0175_3 crossref_primary_10_1175_JAS_D_14_0378_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_008_9220_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9544_0 crossref_primary_10_1890_10_0899_1 crossref_primary_10_2307_1313296 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_010_1463_y crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_1997_078_1844_MLAADP_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1029_2017JG004344 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_010_9521_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_022_00959_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_020_00708_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_007_9078_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apgeochem_2011_03_098 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_004_0357_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_01_00514_X crossref_primary_10_1080_15230430_2001_12003447 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2001_082_2245_FAFONI_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_1751 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_ecolsys_37_091305_110246 crossref_primary_10_2136_sssaj2001_1812 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2006_016_1590_EMOADI_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_013_2650_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_ncomms7347 crossref_primary_10_1029_95JD03229 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_003_0165_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2009_10_013 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_005_0444_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_1688_1998_tb04152_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0160_4120_02_00179_4 crossref_primary_10_1525_bio_2012_62_3_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2006_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1002_2016JG003398 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_1733 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10533_014_9991_0 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1934477100 crossref_primary_10_1071_SR04132 crossref_primary_10_1002_2016WR019538 crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2000_010_1648_CLFIND_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_014_9792_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_018_0859_6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 1995 The Ecological Society of America 1995 by the Ecological Society of America 1995 INIST-CNRS COPYRIGHT 1995 Ecological Society of America Copyright Ecological Society of America Mar 1995 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 1995 The Ecological Society of America – notice: 1995 by the Ecological Society of America – notice: 1995 INIST-CNRS – notice: COPYRIGHT 1995 Ecological Society of America – notice: Copyright Ecological Society of America Mar 1995 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW FIXVA FKUCP IOIBA K30 PAAUG PAWHS PAWZZ PAXOH PBHAV PBQSW PBYQZ PCIWU PCMID PCZJX PDGRG PDWWI PETMR PFVGT PGXDX PIHIL PISVA PJCTQ PJTMS PLCHJ PMHAD PNQDJ POUND PPLAD PQAPC PQCAN PQCMW PQEME PQHKH PQMID PQNCT PQNET PQSCT PQSET PSVJG PVMQY PZGFC 3V. 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 7X2 7X7 7XB 88A 88E 88I 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BEC BENPR BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ K9. L.- L.0 LK8 M0K M0S M1P M2O M2P M7P MBDVC P64 PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY Q9U R05 RC3 SOI 7UA 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.2307/1941208 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Periodicals Index Online Segment 03 Periodicals Index Online Segment 04 Periodicals Index Online Segment 29 Periodicals Index Online Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50 Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Biology Database (Alumni Edition) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Journals Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection eLibrary Curriculum ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard Biological Sciences Agriculture Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Proquest Medical Database Research Library Science Database Biological Science Database Research Library (Corporate) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic University of Michigan Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Periodicals Index Online Segment 04 Periodicals Index Online Segment 03 Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50 Periodicals Index Online Periodicals Index Online Segment 29 Agricultural Science Database Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials elibrary SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) University of Michigan Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Environment Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) Water Resources Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Agricultural Science Database CrossRef Ecology Abstracts AGRICOLA |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology Ecology Environmental Sciences Geology |
EISSN | 1939-9170 |
EndPage | 509 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1623450 A17041044 3670349 10_2307_1941208 ECY1995762493 1941208 |
Genre | article Feature |
GeographicLocations | South America Chile World America |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Chile |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .-4 0R~ 0VX 1OB 1OC 29G 2AX 2KS 4.4 42X 53G 5GY 6TJ 7X2 7X7 7XC 85S 88E 88I 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 8WZ A.K A6W AAESR AAHBH AAHKG AAISJ AAKGQ ABAWQ ABBHK ABEFU ABGFU ABJNI ABLJU ABPFR ABPLY ABPPZ ABPQH ABSQW ABTLG ABUWG ABXSQ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHIC ACHJO ACKIV ACKOT ACNCT ACPRK ACSTJ ACUBG ADBBV ADKYN ADMHG ADULT ADZMN AEGXH AENEX AEUPB AEUYN AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFKRA AFRAH AFXHP AGNAY AGUYK AHXOZ AIAGR AIDAL AILXY ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQVQM AS~ ATCPS AZFZN AZQEC AZVAB BBNVY BCU BEC BENPR BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CBGCD CCPQU CS3 CUYZI D0L D1J DDYGU DEVKO DU5 DWQXO EBS EJD F5P FVMVE FYUFA GNUQQ GTFYD GUQSH HCIFZ HGD HGLYW HMCUK HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF IAG IAO IEA IEP IGH IGS IOF IPO IPSME ITC JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST LATKE LK8 LOXES LU7 LUTES M0K M1P M2O M2P M7P MVM N9A NHB O9- OK1 OMK P2P PALCI PATMY PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSQYO PYCSY Q2X R05 RJQFR RSZ RWL RXW SA0 SAMSI SJFOW SJN SUPJJ TAE TN5 U5U UBC UHB UKHRP UKR VOH WBKPD WH7 WXSBR Y6R YR2 YV5 YXE YYM YYP YZZ ZCA ~02 ~KM 33P 692 AAFWJ AAHQN AAIHA AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCUV ABDQB ABRJW ACAHQ ACPOU ACXBN ACXQS ADOZA ADXAS ADXHL AEFGJ AEIGN AEUYR AFFPM AFQQW AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB BCR BES BFHJK BKOMP BLC BMXJE BRXPI DCZOG DRFUL DRSTM E.L ECGQY HF~ KQ8 LEEKS LITHE LYRES MEWTI MV1 MW2 NXSMM P2W PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB QZG ROL V62 WHG WOHZO XIH XSW Z0I ZCG ZO4 ZZTAW AAHHS AAYXX ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CITATION IQODW PMFND FIXVA FKUCP IOIBA K30 PAAUG PAWHS PAWZZ PAXOH PBHAV PBQSW PBYQZ PCIWU PCMID PCZJX PDGRG PDWWI PETMR PFVGT PGXDX PIHIL PISVA PJCTQ PJTMS PLCHJ PMHAD PNQDJ POUND PPLAD PQAPC PQCAN PQCMW PQEME PQHKH PQMID PQNCT PQNET PQSCT PQSET PSVJG PVMQY PZGFC 3V. 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 7XB 88A 8FD 8FK C1K FR3 K9. L.- L.0 MBDVC P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U RC3 SOI 7UA 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5843-dd1c30c461f1bcae7cb687980cc86da8f91da9a74fc8bc3f8bdb24d659f172c03 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0012-9658 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:24:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:14:02 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:48:22 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 07:20:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 13 00:48:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:30:00 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:39:43 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:08:37 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:24:41 EDT 2025 Thu Jun 19 14:53:00 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Nutrient Air pollution Biogeochemical cycle Primary forest Ecosystem |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5843-dd1c30c461f1bcae7cb687980cc86da8f91da9a74fc8bc3f8bdb24d659f172c03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 218956002 |
PQPubID | 1817179 |
PageCount | 17 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1810045937 proquest_miscellaneous_16740745 proquest_journals_218956002 proquest_journals_1296433653 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A17041044 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A17041044 pascalfrancis_primary_3670349 crossref_citationtrail_10_2307_1941208 crossref_primary_10_2307_1941208 wiley_primary_10_2307_1941208_ECY1995762493 jstor_primary_10_2307_1941208 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | March 1995 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1995-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 1995 text: March 1995 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | Washington, DC |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Washington, DC – name: Brooklyn, N.Y., etc – name: Brooklyn |
PublicationTitle | Ecology (Durham) |
PublicationYear | 1995 |
Publisher | The Ecological Society of America Ecological Society of America Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Ecological Society of America – name: Ecological Society of America – name: Brooklyn Botanic Garden, etc |
SSID | ssj0000148 |
Score | 2.0467558 |
Snippet | Atmospheric pollution and other human activities have altered natural element cycles over large regions of the world. Much current understanding of nutrient... The patterns of hydrologic nutrient loss from old-growth temperate forest ecosystems in southern Chile based on chemical analyses of small streams draining 31... |
SourceID | proquest gale pascalfrancis crossref wiley jstor |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 493 |
SubjectTerms | aerosols air pollution ammonium compounds Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology anthropogenic activities Atmospherics biocenosis Biogeochemistry Biological and medical sciences Biology Biotic communities chemical analysis Chile Coastal forests Coniferous forests ecological succession Ecosystems Forest ecology Forest ecosystems Forest hydrology Forest soils Forests Forests and forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geology humification hydrology leaching mineralization nitrates nitrogen nitrogen content Nutrient loss nutrients Old growth forests prediction soil organic nitrogen streams Synecology Temperate forests temperate zones Terrestrial ecosystems Watersheds |
Title | Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old-Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1941208 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307%2F1941208 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1296433653 https://www.proquest.com/docview/218956002 https://www.proquest.com/docview/16740745 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1810045937 |
Volume | 76 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELdgExIviK-JsHUYCfYC0ZzY-eIFjSljQmKaEJPKU2Sf44JUJYW0D_3vuUvcrtUob5FycZze-XxX3_1-jL3JYqFBZCaMXZ6GKnEQapvoEJwkgLpCmJ5F4etVenmjvoyTsa_N6XxZ5con9o7atkD_kZ_iVkShvIg_zn6HRBpFh6ueQeM-2yfkMqroysbZBnqU8o44Dgnj5LZn9hRT9ygmSsmNzci75KEskWokdYc_kxv4LbYC0M0wtt-HLh6zRz6A5GeDxp-we3XzlD0YKCWXeFWCvzoob3vY8AG_iDsU-dyz-S6fsel1j67ZdLx1vCFcfpTlU5wqp7YTvmhmxISMQel73k5tOMGcff6TE5wVYTHXHCNenGr3gZdr0HAayvxqJzVRcfVYBLxvllw-ZzcX5ffzy9DTL4SAUYkMrY1AClBp5CIDus7ApHlW5AIgT63OXRFZXehMOcgNSJcba2Jl06RwGBWBkAdsr2mb-gXjoJwQYCOjololVhpZR8rWoIo8zTABC9jJSg8VeGxyosiYVpijkMIqr7AAx1oJzgY4jrsiJ6TIihYojgHa9xngTAjqqjqLMqEwCVUBe7slOBlwvv8hN-pNYvcLR1umspYjbDyp8OOOVqZTeQfRVREdd0uZJjJgh3dvr609YK_Wd3Hh02mObup2gSOkGSbjKgnY610SOcEBJhiABuxdb7K7PqEqz39Qrz7ujKqQL_87o0P2cGjrpzq8I7Y3_7OoRxiYzc1xv_yO2f6n8ur621-aTDYf |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZGJwQviNtE2MqMxPYC0eLYuSEhNEZGx7ZqQps0nkJsxwWpSsraauqP4j9yTuJ0rUZ521uknDiOzvG5xD7fR8ibyPdy5UXS9U0cuiIwys11kLvKcASoSzxZsyic9sPehfh6GVyukT9tLwweq2x9Yu2odaXwH_kehCJM5T3_4-i3i6RRuLnaMmg0VnFczK6hYht_OPoM6t3x_cP0_KDnWlIBV0Gs5a7WTHFPiZAZJlVeREqGcZTEnlJxqPPYJEznSR4Jo2KpuImllr7QYZAYiPXK4zDuPbIuOFQyHbL-Ke2ffVvAqxLW9fsuoqrcdOnusUQwH0ksF8KfDQLNQUg8lZmPQTGmYdRYSnkXE-c68h0-Jo9sykr3Gxt7QtaK8im535BYzuAqVfZqI73pmoMHrNsYg8iXmj949owMz2o8z3JMK0NLZAIAWTqEqVJsdKHTcoTcy5AGv6PVULuDq-p68pMigBaiPxcUcmyY6vg9Tecw5TiU_FUNCiT_qtEPaN2eOXtOLu5ENxukU1Zl8YJQJYznKc2kYIUINJe8YEIXSiRxGEHJ55DdVg-ZsmjoSMoxzKAqQoVlVmEOjNUKjhoAkNsiu6jIDF0CjKFy29kAM0FwrWyfRZ6Aslc4ZGdJcNAgi_9DrlubxOoXdpdMZS6HaHxcwMdttaaTWZc0zhhusHMeBtwhm7dvz9eXQ7bnd8HV4P5RXhbVFEYIIyj_ReCQ16skYgQgDCDldcjb2mRXfUKWHnxHdACIxSLhL_87o23yoHd-epKdHPWPN8nDBlQATwFukc7kalp0IS2cyFd2MVLy467X_1_80XRg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELfGEIgXxNdE2MqMxPYCUePYiRMkhKYtZWMw7YFJ5SmL7bggVUlZWk390_jvuMtH12qUt71FysVxdOe7c3z3-xHyVvpepj2pXN9GoSsCq93MBJmrLUeAuthTNYvCt7Pw-EJ8GQbDDfKn64XBssrOJ9aO2pQa_5H3IRRhKu_5fdtWRZwfDT5NfrtIIIUHrR2bRmMhp_n8GnZv1ceTI1D1nu8Pku-Hx25LMOBqiLvcNYZp7mkRMsuUznKpVRjJOPK0jkKTRTZmJoszKayOlOY2Ukb5woRBbCHua4_DuPfIfckDhktMDuUScpVog4DvIr7KTb9un8WC-UhnuRQI23DQlERifWZWgYpsw62xkvwup9B1DBw8IY_b5JUeNNb2lGzkxTPyoKGznMNVoturreSmfw4eaB1IBSKfaybh-XMyPq-RPYuKlpYWyAkAsnQMU6XY8kJnxQRZmCEhfk_LsXFHV-X19CdFKC3Egc4pZNsw1eoDTRaA5TiU-lWOcqQBq3EQaN2oOX9BLu5EM1tksyiL_CWhWljP04YpwXIRGK54zoTJtYijUMLmzyH7nR5S3eKiIz3HOIX9ESosbRXmwFid4KSBArktso-KTNE5wBg6a3scYCYIs5UeMOkJ2AALh-ytCI4ajPF_yPVqk1j_wt6KqSzkEJePC_i4nc500tY5VSnDo3bOw4A7ZPv27cVKc8ju4i44HTxJyoq8nMEIoRSQewYOebNOIkIowgCSX4e8q0123SekyeEPxAmAqCxi_uq_M9olD2HVp19Pzk63yaMGXQDLAXfI5vRqlvcgP5yq1_VKpOTyrpf-Xyj4dzA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns+of+Nutrient+Loss+from+Unpolluted%2C+Old%E2%80%90Growth+Temperate+Forests%3A+Evaluation+of+Biogeochemical+Theory&rft.jtitle=Ecology+%28Durham%29&rft.au=Hedin%2C+Lars+O.&rft.au=Armesto%2C+Juan+J.&rft.au=Johnson%2C+Arthur+H.&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=509&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307%2F1941208&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_2307_1941208 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |