Mental Context Reinstatement Increases Resistance to False Suggestions After Children Have Experienced a Repeated Event

• Published in: Psychiatry, psychology, and law Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 594 - 606
• Main Authors: Drohan-Jennings, Donna M., Roberts, Kim P., Powell, Martine B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Routledge 01.11.2010
• Subjects: Accuracy; Child abuse; Child witnesses; Children; children's memory; Evaluation; eyewitness; Interviewing in child abuse; interviews; Investigation; memory; Memory in children; mental context; Psychology; Reinstatement; repeated experiences; Resistance; source monitoring; suggestibility; Vigilance (Psychology); Witnesses; AUSTRALIA
• ISSN: 1321-8719; 1934-1687
• DOI: 10.1080/13218711003739110

When children allege repeated abuse, they are required to provide details about specific instances. This often results in children confusing details from different instances, therefore the aim of this study was to examine whether mental context reinstatement (MCR) could be used to improve children's accuracy. Children ('N' 1/4 120, 6-7-yearolds) participated in four activities over a 2-week period and were interviewed about the last (fourth) time with a standard recall or MCR interview. They were then asked questions about specific details, and some questions contained false information. When interviewed again 1 day later, children in the MCR condition resisted false suggestions that were consistent with the event more than false suggestions that were inconsistent; in contrast, children in the standard interview condition were equally suggestible for both false detail types and showed a yes bias. The results suggest a practical way of eliciting more accurate information from child witnesses.