Significant Escherichia coli Attenuation by Vegetative Buffers on Annual Grasslands
ABSTRACT A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall‐runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of environmental quality Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 795 - 805 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Madison
American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society
01.05.2006
Crop Science Society of America American Society of Agronomy |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | ABSTRACT
A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall‐runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet–dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0‐ by 3.0‐m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1‐, 1.1‐, and 2.1‐m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall‐runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1‐m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters.A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall‐runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet–dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0‐ by 3.0‐m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1‐, 1.1‐, and 2.1‐m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall‐runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1‐m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log 10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log^sub 10^ reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log sub(10) reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. ABSTRACT A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall‐runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet–dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0‐ by 3.0‐m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1‐, 1.1‐, and 2.1‐m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall‐runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1‐m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet-dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 logsub 10 reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and subject to natural rainfall-runoff conditions. The study was conducted on annual grasslands in California's northern Sierra Nevada foothills, a region with a distinct wet–dry season Mediterranean climate. We used 48, 2.0- by 3.0-m runoff plots to examine the efficacy of 0.1-, 1.1-, and 2.1-m buffers at three land slopes (5, 20, and 35%) and four dry vegetation matter levels (225, 560, 900, and 4500 kg/ha) across 27 rainfall-runoff events during two rainfall seasons. Buffer width treatments were implemented by placement of cattle fecal material containing known loads of E. coli 0.1, 1.1, or 2.1 m upslope of the plot runoff collector. Mean total runoff to total rainfall ratio per plot ranged from 0.014:1 to 0.019:1 and reflected the high infiltration capacity of these soils. Approximately 94.8 to 99.995% of total E. coli load applied to each plot appears to be either retained in the fecal pat and/or attenuated within 0.1 m downslope of the fecal pat, irrespective of the presence of a wider vegetated buffer. Relative to a 0.1-m buffer, we found 0.3 to 3.1 log₁₀ reduction in E. coli discharge per additional meter of vegetative buffer across the range of residual dry vegetation matter levels, land slope, and rainfall and runoff conditions experienced during this project. Buffer efficiency was significantly reduced as runoff increased. These results support the assertion that grassland buffers are an effective method for reducing animal agricultural inputs of waterborne E. coli into surface waters. |
| Author | Bartolome, James W. Nader, Glenn Tate, Kenneth W. Atwill, Edward R. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kenneth W. surname: Tate fullname: Tate, Kenneth W. email: kwtate@ucdavis.edu organization: University of California – sequence: 2 givenname: Edward R. surname: Atwill fullname: Atwill, Edward R. organization: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California – sequence: 3 givenname: James W. surname: Bartolome fullname: Bartolome, James W. organization: University of California – sequence: 4 givenname: Glenn surname: Nader fullname: Nader, Glenn organization: University of California Cooperative Extension |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17771905$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16585622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqF0s1rFDEUAPAgFbut3jzLIOjJrS-fL3Ncy1qVgkjVa8hmMm2W2UybzCj735vprgpF3EO-fy_k452Qo9hHT8hzCmeMcvF27e8YgDwDKugjMqOS45yV6ojMAETpCyaPyUnOawDKANUTckyV1FIxNiNXV-E6hjY4G4dqmd2NT8HdBFu5vgvVYhh8HO0Q-litttV3f-2HMvrhq3dj2_qUq7KwiIV01UWyOXc2NvkpedzaLvtn-_aUfHu__Hr-YX75-eLj-eJy7qTmdC4ahgi-BWs1rVspV65uUApoOKDX3mlVY4OsAbRaS5RaraygGkELbmXLT8nr3b63qb8bfR7MJmTnu3II34_ZKNQMuWQHodCUMy7rg5ArRgUHfRgCKKlAHYSMlr9gShyEtMbpLljgywdw3Y8ploeeDEemORT0Yo_G1cY35jaFjU1b8_vjC3i1BzY727XJRhfyX4eItAZZHNs5l_qck2-NC8N9QgzJhs5QMFMWmn0WmikLS9CbB0F_9v03r3f8Z-j89r_WfFp-YVMpE_exvwBNOuqb |
| CODEN | JEVQAA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jeq2_20436 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2010_04_039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cropro_2018_02_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2494_2007_00599_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_024_01907_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agwat_2010_06_015 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2010_0391 crossref_primary_10_3733_ca_v062n02p68 crossref_primary_10_3733_ca_2017a0031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40974_016_0006_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_010_0467_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13954 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2012_0005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2023_1101435 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2014_01_053 crossref_primary_10_2111_RANGELANDS_D_10_00064_1 crossref_primary_10_1890_120243 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2008_12_010 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01286_15 crossref_primary_10_1093_biosci_biv152 crossref_primary_10_3733_ca_v061n04p159 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2009_0464 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10393_010_0299_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2017_07_186 crossref_primary_10_1128_aem_01600_22 crossref_primary_10_1002_rra_2821 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40974_016_0032_9 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2016_05_0192 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109134 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1751731109004005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2019_00074 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_013_3132_4 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2010_0175 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs13204028 crossref_primary_10_1108_17568691111175650 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1508435112 crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_00100_07 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10750_011_0653_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2019_00102 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40974_016_0049_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_617066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2011_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2020_105746 crossref_primary_10_4141_cjss_2014_082 crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_6563 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40974_016_0026_7 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2008_0029 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2016_07_0255 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10457_013_9647_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_10643389_2012_710449 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40974_018_0081_3 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2007_0413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_135607 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/BF00336066 10.1023/A:1021344807285 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024667.89579.ed 10.1007/BF02143533 10.3733/ca.v053n06p44 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb04154.x 10.2134/jeq2004.2252 10.2134/jeq2004.2243 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x 10.13031/2013.28149 10.2307/4003867 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00337-1 10.2134/jeq1980.00472425000900030032x 10.1002/1099-0755(200009/10)10:5<323::AID-AQC417>3.0.CO;2-J 10.1007/s00267-002-2755-y 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1_2 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5517-5527.2002 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4604-4610.2003 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1151-1159.2004 10.2307/4003435 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04642.x 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04180.x 10.13031/2013.31033 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050004x 10.2307/3897404 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050013x 10.2460/ajvr.1999.60.04.420 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1367 10.2134/jeq2005.0033 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1989.tb03258.x 10.2134/jeq2004.0984 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00069.x 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90197-X 10.2307/3898219 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | ASA, CSSA, SSSA 2006 INIST-CNRS Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2006 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: ASA, CSSA, SSSA – notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright American Society of Agronomy May/Jun 2006 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7ST 7T7 7TG 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BEC BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ K9. KL. L6V M0K M0S M1P M2O M2P M7S MBDVC P64 PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYCSY Q9U S0X SOI 7QL 7TV 7U6 7SU KR7 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.2134/jeq2005.0141 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials eLibrary ProQuest Central (New) Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Agricultural Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest research library Science Database Engineering Database Research Library (Corporate) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering collection Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial Environment Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Pollution Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Environmental Engineering Abstracts Civil Engineering Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials elibrary ProQuest AP Science SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) SIRS Editorial ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library Materials Science & Engineering Collection Environment Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) Sustainability Science Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Pollution Abstracts Environmental Engineering Abstracts Civil Engineering Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Agricultural Science Database Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database MEDLINE Technology Research Database AGRICOLA Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Agriculture Environmental Sciences Applied Sciences |
| EISSN | 1537-2537 |
| EndPage | 805 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 308335429 1066461541 16585622 17771905 10_2134_jeq2005_0141 JEQ2JEQ20050141 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | California United States North America America INE, USA, California |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: INE, USA, California – name: California |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) – fundername: North America Technical Committee on Food Microbiology |
| GroupedDBID | --- .4S .DC .~0 0R~ 186 18M 1OB 1OC 29K 2WC 33P 3V. 42X 53G 5GY 6KN 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8C1 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8G5 8R4 8R5 8WZ A6W AAHBH AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANLZ AAYCA ABCQX ABCUV ABDNZ ABJCF ABJNI ABTAH ABUWG ACAWQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGOD ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACXQS ACYGS ADBBV ADFRT ADKYN ADYHW ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYN AEUYR AFFPM AFKRA AFRAH AFWVQ AHBTC AHMBA AI. AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB ARCSS ATCPS AZQEC BAWUL BCR BCU BEC BENPR BES BFHJK BGLVJ BHPHI BLC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU CS3 D-I DCZOG DDYGU DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD F5P FA8 FYUFA GNUQQ GUQSH GX1 H13 HCIFZ HGLYW HMCUK H~9 L6V L7B LATKE LEEKS M0K M1P M2O M2P M2Q M7S MEWTI MV1 NHAZY NHB O9- P2P PATMY PEA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PYCSY Q2X QF4 QM1 QM4 QN7 RAK ROL RWL RXW S0X SAMSI SJFOW SUPJJ TAE TN5 TR2 TWZ UKHRP UKR VH1 VJK WH7 WOQ WXSBR XJT Y6R ZCA ZY4 ~02 ~KM AAYXX ADXHL AEYWJ AGHNM AGYGG CITATION PHGZM PHGZT AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY IQODW PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM YIF YIN 7ST 7T7 7TG 7XB 8FD 8FK C1K FR3 K9. KL. MBDVC P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS PUEGO Q9U SOI 7QL 7TV 7U6 7SU KR7 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5831-4d2770ef0aa819f55bc9d7540d307e8ec8697d72d07a8857586ba41870843a5f3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
| ISSN | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 14:30:25 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 07 14:02:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:47:23 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 11:24:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:50:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:14:32 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 13:58:49 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:48:16 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:14:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:27:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:24 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:38:39 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Grassland Hill Escherichia coli Dry matter Rain Selfpurification Placement Collector Land slope Bacteria Attenuation Agriculture Feces Rainy season Waterborne transmission Ungulata Enterobacteriaceae Vegetative filter strip Bovine Pollutant behavior Runoff water Project Soils Vertebrata Mammalia Dry season Animal Surface water Vegetation Infiltration Artiodactyla Mediterranean climate |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5831-4d2770ef0aa819f55bc9d7540d307e8ec8697d72d07a8857586ba41870843a5f3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 16585622 |
| PQID | 197372830 |
| PQPubID | 23462 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67827352 proquest_miscellaneous_48132359 proquest_miscellaneous_36214308 proquest_miscellaneous_30065606 proquest_miscellaneous_21165264 proquest_miscellaneous_19773527 proquest_journals_197372830 pubmed_primary_16585622 pascalfrancis_primary_17771905 crossref_citationtrail_10_2134_jeq2005_0141 crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2005_0141 wiley_primary_10_2134_jeq2005_0141_JEQ2JEQ20050141 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | May 2006 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2006 text: May 2006 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Madison |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Madison – name: Madison, WI – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of environmental quality |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Environ Qual |
| PublicationYear | 2006 |
| Publisher | American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society Crop Science Society of America American Society of Agronomy |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society – name: American Society of Agronomy – name: Crop Science Society of America |
| References | 2004; 65 1995; 50 2004; 64 1984; 20 2000; 29 2002; 30 2002; 56 1999; 28 1989; 81 1994; 23 1998 2000; 230 1994; 48 2002 1999; 60 1976; 29 1977 2004; 33 2004; 70 1989; 32 2001 2000 2004a; 33 2000; 10 2002; 68 1980; 33 1999; 15 2000; 53 1999; 35 2003; 69 1988; 110 1999; 53 1994; 37 1980; 9 2004b; 57 1998; 53 1998; 34 2005; 34 1989 1996; 23 1988 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 Griffin J.R. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 1977 Lewis D.J. (e_1_2_7_30_1) 2000; 230 Atwill E.R. (e_1_2_7_5_1) 1999; 60 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program (e_1_2_7_21_1) 1988 Bull R.J. (e_1_2_7_12_1) 2001 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 American Public Health Association (e_1_2_7_2_1) 1989 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 Coyne M.S. (e_1_2_7_16_1) 1998; 53 e_1_2_7_38_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 Bartolome J.W. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 2002 Coyne M.S. (e_1_2_7_15_1) 1995; 50 Lytle D.J. (e_1_2_7_31_1) 1998 Pinheiro J.C. (e_1_2_7_34_1) 2000 |
| References_xml | – volume: 53 start-page: 140 year: 1998 end-page: 145 article-title: Fecal bacteria trapping by grass filter strips during simulated rain publication-title: J. Soil Water Conserv. – volume: 28 start-page: 1479 year: 1999 end-page: 1489 article-title: Filter strip performance and processes for different vegetation, widths, and contaminants publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – volume: 34 start-page: 1651 year: 2005 end-page: 1664 article-title: Quantifying the impact of regular cutting on vegetative buffer efficacy for nitrogen‐15 sequestration publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – volume: 30 start-page: 641 year: 2002 end-page: 650 article-title: Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of agricultural buffers publication-title: Environ. Manage. – volume: 32 start-page: 513 year: 1989 end-page: 519 article-title: Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution‐control publication-title: Trans. ASAE – volume: 34 start-page: 1061 year: 1998 end-page: 1069 article-title: Effects of a dairy loafing lot‐buffer strip on stream water quality publication-title: J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. – volume: 33 start-page: 2243 year: 2004a end-page: 2251 article-title: Efficacy of vegetated buffer strips for retaining publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – year: 2001 – year: 1989 – volume: 37 start-page: 845 year: 1994 end-page: 850 article-title: Effectiveness of vegetative filter strips in retaining surface‐applied swine manure constituents publication-title: Trans. ASAE – volume: 65 start-page: 1367 year: 2004 end-page: 1376 article-title: Distribution of O157:H7 within and among cattle operations in pasture‐based agricultural areas publication-title: Am. J. Vet. Res. – volume: 70 start-page: 1151 year: 2004 end-page: 1159 article-title: Dispersion and transport of oocysts from fecal pats under simulated rainfall events publication-title: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. – volume: 68 start-page: 5517 year: 2002 end-page: 5527 article-title: Transport of oocysts through vegetated buffer strips and estimated filtration efficiency publication-title: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. – volume: 20 start-page: 61 year: 1984 end-page: 66 article-title: Fecal coliform release from cattle fecal deposits publication-title: Water Resour. Bull. – volume: 33 start-page: 4 year: 1980 end-page: 8 article-title: Influence of natural mulch on forage production on differing California annual range sites publication-title: J. Range Manage. – volume: 29 start-page: 1206 year: 2000 end-page: 1214 article-title: The influence of vegetation in riparian filter strips on coliform bacteria: I. Movement and survival in water publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – volume: 10 start-page: 323 year: 2000 end-page: 352 article-title: Organic matter sources and rehabilitation of the Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta (California, USA) publication-title: Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwater Syst. – volume: 15 start-page: 76 year: 1999 end-page: 83 article-title: Potential health risks associated with the persistence of 0157 in agricultural environments publication-title: Soil Use Manage. – volume: 33 start-page: 984 year: 2004 end-page: 993 article-title: Overland and near‐surface transport of from vegetated and nonvegetated surfaces publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – year: 1998 – volume: 56 start-page: 249 year: 2002 end-page: 257 article-title: Soil‐water infiltration under crops, pasture, and established riparian buffer in Midwestern USA publication-title: Agrofor. Syst. – volume: 33 start-page: 2252 year: 2004 end-page: 2262 article-title: Using N to Quantify vegetative buffer effectiveness for sequestering N in runoff publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – volume: 50 start-page: 405 year: 1995 end-page: 408 article-title: Soil and fecal coliform trapping by grass filter during simulated rainfall publication-title: J. Soil Water Conserv. – start-page: 383 year: 1977 end-page: 416 – volume: 110 start-page: 9 year: 1988 end-page: 17 article-title: Plant and soil‐nitrogen dynamics in California annual grassland publication-title: Plant Soil – volume: 9 start-page: 483 year: 1980 end-page: 487 article-title: Effectiveness of vegetated buffer strips in controlling pollution from feedlot runoff publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – volume: 69 start-page: 4604 year: 2003 end-page: 4610 article-title: Improved quantitative estimates of low environmental loading and sporadic periparturient shedding of in adult beef cattle publication-title: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. – volume: 57 start-page: 411 year: 2004b end-page: 417 article-title: Effects of canopy and grazing on soil bulk density on annual rangeland publication-title: J. Range Manage. – year: 2002 – volume: 53 start-page: 44 year: 1999 end-page: 48 article-title: On California rangeland watersheds: Timing, frequency of sampling affect accuracy of water quality monitoring publication-title: Calif. Agric. – year: 1988 – volume: 29 start-page: 109 year: 1976 end-page: 113 article-title: Water quality implications of cattle grazing on a semiarid watershed in southeastern Utah publication-title: J. Range Manage. – volume: 230 start-page: 106 year: 2000 end-page: 117 article-title: Hydrology in a California oak woodland watershed: A 17‐year study publication-title: J. Hydrol. – volume: 23 start-page: 215 year: 1996 end-page: 220 article-title: Use of a novel tilting table apparatus to demonstrate the horizontal and vertical movement of the protozoan in soil publication-title: Biol. Fertil. Soils – volume: 60 start-page: 420 year: 1999 end-page: 425 article-title: Age, geographic, and temporal distribution of fecal shedding of oocysts in cow‐calf herds publication-title: Am. J. Vet. Res. – volume: 23 start-page: 878 year: 1994 end-page: 882 article-title: Wetland and stream buffer requirements: A review publication-title: J. Environ. Qual. – start-page: 57 year: 2000 end-page: 96 – volume: 64 start-page: 169 year: 2004 end-page: 191 article-title: The impact of climate change on wildfire severity: A regional forecast for northern California publication-title: Clim. Change – volume: 35 start-page: 867 year: 1999 end-page: 875 article-title: Sediment and nitrogen transport in grass filter strips publication-title: J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. – volume: 53 start-page: 295 year: 2000 end-page: 299 article-title: transport from cattle fecal deposits on California rangeland publication-title: J. Range Manage. – volume: 81 start-page: 41 year: 1989 end-page: 53 article-title: The occurrence of disinfection by‐products in United States drinking water publication-title: J. Am. Water Works Assoc. – volume: 48 start-page: 113 year: 1994 end-page: 118 article-title: Water‐quality benefits of having cattle manure deposited away from streams publication-title: Bioresour. Technol. – volume-title: California guidelines for residual dry matter (RDM) management on coastal and foothill annual rangelands year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00336066 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1021344807285 – volume-title: California's forests and rangelands: Growing conflict over changing uses year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000024667.89579.ed – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02143533 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.3733/ca.v053n06p44 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb04154.x – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.2252 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.2243 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040026x – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.13031/2013.28149 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.2307/4003867 – volume: 230 start-page: 106 year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 article-title: Hydrology in a California oak woodland watershed: A 17‐year study publication-title: J. Hydrol. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00337-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq1980.00472425000900030032x – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1002/1099-0755(200009/10)10:5<323::AID-AQC417>3.0.CO;2-J – volume-title: Soil survey of Yuba County, California year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2755-y – start-page: 57 volume-title: Mixed effects model in S and S‐Plus year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1_2 – volume-title: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 – volume-title: Health effects and occurrence of disinfection by‐products year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 – start-page: 383 volume-title: Terrestrial vegetation of California year: 1977 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5517-5527.2002 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4604-4610.2003 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1151-1159.2004 – volume: 53 start-page: 140 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 article-title: Fecal bacteria trapping by grass filter strips during simulated rain publication-title: J. Soil Water Conserv. – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.2307/4003435 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04642.x – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04180.x – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.13031/2013.31033 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050004x – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.2307/3897404 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050013x – volume: 60 start-page: 420 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 article-title: Age, geographic, and temporal distribution of fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cow‐calf herds publication-title: Am. J. Vet. Res. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1999.60.04.420 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1367 – volume: 50 start-page: 405 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 article-title: Soil and fecal coliform trapping by grass filter during simulated rainfall publication-title: J. Soil Water Conserv. – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0033 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1989.tb03258.x – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0984 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00069.x – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90197-X – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.2307/3898219 |
| SSID | ssj0012076 |
| Score | 2.07242 |
| Snippet | ABSTRACT
A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits... A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and... A study was conducted to estimate the retention efficiency of vegetative buffers for Escherichia coli deposited on grasslands in cattle fecal deposits and... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 795 |
| SubjectTerms | agricultural runoff Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animals annual grasslands Applied sciences Bacteria bacterial contamination Biological and medical sciences Buffers California Cattle cattle manure Colony Count, Microbial Dry season E coli Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Exact sciences and technology Feces Feces - microbiology filter strips Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasslands Infiltration capacity isolation & purification Microbiology overland flow Parasites physiology Poaceae Poaceae - physiology Pollution pollution control Pollution, environment geology rain Rainfall-runoff relationships Runoff Surface water Vegetation |
| Title | Significant Escherichia coli Attenuation by Vegetative Buffers on Annual Grasslands |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2134%2Fjeq2005.0141 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16585622 https://www.proquest.com/docview/197372830 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19773527 https://www.proquest.com/docview/21165264 https://www.proquest.com/docview/30065606 https://www.proquest.com/docview/36214308 https://www.proquest.com/docview/48132359 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67827352 |
| Volume | 35 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fb9MwED7B9gKaEAwGYVD8AE8oWuz8sPOEuindNIkJGEN9i-zEqYpQ2jXtJP577hK3VSXSh0aq_EVK7nzxd87lPoCPKcnE4bLkp7LCBMWaxNdxUvmB5VqaIqxkSfuQX2-Sq7voehyPXW1O48oq18_E9kFdzgraIz_jKQmqqDD4Mr_3STSKXq46BY3HcEidy6iiS443-RYXQastF7TNCHBudnXv1MLs7Le977ZTeMR3VqSjuW7QOFWnavE_2rnLYttlaPQcnjn-yIadw1_AI1sfw9PhZOF6aNhjOMm2H68h1EVv8xJub6eTmkqD0Josa8hdUyp1ZjgZpmy4RPrcNf5m5i_7ZSdtJeKDZecrElFpGA507fjZ5QI5d_uV8Cu4G2U_L658J6rgF7EK0R2lkDKwVaA1koEqjk2RlhJ5W4nRbpUtVJLKUooykFqRfKdKjI44hrWKQh1X4Qkc1LPavgFWpEYkBp2CKUokIm2sqTiubhbP0mWaePB5bdi8cB3HSfjiT46ZB7khd27IyQ0efNqg512njR7cYMdHW7CUEulN7MHp2mm5C8gm30wfDz5sRjGS6PWIru1s1UIk0lHZjxDUqwjvtR8REqXDnHAPIhFIUQPVj4gUD0UYp_0IJBiCLtWD192c3NoACSUyWhwR7STda8n8Ovsu6EdNgPD_272GO4Un3fYTFXu-g4PlYmXfIyFbmkEbdnhUF5yOo8sBHJ5nN99-_APT8zTa |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VcgBUISiUuoV2D_SErNrrx9oHhFJISZ8SaotyM7v2OgqqnDROQP1R_MfOeO1EkXBuPeRg7efInpnd-WY9OwPwMaY2ceiW7FjkGKBoFdoyCHPb0a4UKvVykdE-5MVl2LvxT_tBfw3-NWdhKK2yWROrhTobpbRHfujG1FAl8pwv4zubmkbRx9Wmg4axijN9_xcjtvLzyTdU7wHnx93rrz27bipgp0Hk4eNkXAhH546U6AzzIFBpnAnkLRlau450GoWxyATPHCEjal8ZhUr6Lpp15HsyyD383yfwFP2uQxNK9OfxncudqpedUxU_wLlg8uypZNrhb31ntm9c313ygBtjWaIyctNF4380d5k1V27v-BW8rPkq6xgDew1rutiEF53BpK7ZoTdhq7s4LIfQerUo38DV1XBQUCoSao91SzKPIaVWMzS-IetMka6bQuNM3bOfelBlPv7R7GhGTVtKhgOm_D_7PkGOX51Kfgs3jyLvLVgvRoXeBpbGiocKjQBDIp_7UmmVu-hNNd4lszi04FMj2CStK5xTo43bBCMdUkNSqyEhNVhwMEePTWWPFtzeko4WYCEE0qnAgt1GaUm9AJTJ3Fwt2J-P4sylzzGy0KNZBRFIf0U7glNtJHzXdoRHFBJj0BWIkCMldqJ2hB-5HveCuB2BhIbTo1rwztjkQgZIYJFB4wivjHSlJJPT7g9OPyo6hNc7KwW3D8961xfnyfnJ5dkuPDdbX5Ro-h7Wp5OZ_oBkcKr2qinI4Ndjz_kHtlVsbA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9NAEB2VIiEQQlAomJZ2D_SErNjrj7UPCKU0oR9QgUpRbu6uvY6CkJPGCag_rf-uM147USScWw85RJ5E9s6b3Tfr2XkA72OSicNlyY5FjgmKVqEtgzC3He1KoVIvFxntQ347D48v_dNBMNiA2-YsDJVVNnNiNVFn45T2yDtuTIIqked08roq4vtR_9Pk2iYBKXrR2qhpGISc6Zt_mL2VH0-O0NUHnPd7Pz8f27XAgJ0GkYe3lnEhHJ07UuLCmAeBSuNMIIfJEPk60mkUxiITPHOEjEjKMgqV9F2EeOR7Msg9_N8H8FB4gUshJgaLXM_lTqVr51SNEDAuTM09tU_r_NbXZivH9d2V1fDpRJbomNwoavyP8q4y6GoJ7D-HZzV3ZV0DthewoYsteNIdTuv-HXoLtnvLg3NoWs8c5Uu4uBgNCypLQk-yXklQGVGZNUMgjlh3htTdNB1n6ob90sOqCvKvZodzEnApGV4wUgDsyxT5fnVC-RVc3st4b8NmMS70G2BprHioEBCYHvncl0qr3MWVVeOvZBaHFnxoBjZJ627nJLrxJ8Gsh9yQ1G5IyA0WHCysJ6bLR4vd3oqPlsZCCKRWgQU7jdOSejIokwV0LdhfXMUoplczstDjeWWCKOKi3YJTnyR81nYLj-gk5qNrLEKO9NiJ2i38yPW4F8TtFkhuON2qBa8NJpdjgGQW2TRe4RVI145kctr7welDDYjw-9u1A7cPjzDak68n52c78NjsglHN6S5szqZz_Q554UztVRHI4Oq-Q_4OBX5wog |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Significant+Escherichia+coli+attenuation+by+vegetative+buffers+on+annual+grasslands&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+environmental+quality&rft.au=Tate%2C+Kenneth+W&rft.au=Atwill%2C+Edward+R&rft.au=Bartolome%2C+James+W&rft.au=Nader%2C+Glenn&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=795&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134%2Fjeq2005.0141&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F16585622&rft.externalDocID=16585622 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0047-2425&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0047-2425&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0047-2425&client=summon |