The New Antiepileptic Drugs: Their Neuropharmacology and Clinical Indications
The administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is the first treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common neurological diseases. Therapeutic guidelines include newer AEDs as front-line drugs; monotherapy with new AEDs is delivered in Japan. While about 70% of patients obtain good seizure control b...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurologia medico-chirurgica Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 205 - 220 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
01.01.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is the first treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common neurological diseases. Therapeutic guidelines include newer AEDs as front-line drugs; monotherapy with new AEDs is delivered in Japan. While about 70% of patients obtain good seizure control by taking one to three AEDs, about 60% experience adverse effects and 33% have to change drugs. Compared to traditional AEDs, the prolonged administration of new AEDs elicits fewer adverse effects and fewer drug interactions and their teratogenicity may be lower. These characteristics increase drug compliance and allow combination therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy, although the antiepileptic effects of the new AEDs are not greater than of traditional AEDs. Comorbidities are not rare in epileptics; many adult patients present with stroke and brain tumors. In stroke patients requiring risk control and in chemotherapy-treated brain tumor patients, their fewer drug interactions render the new AEDs advantageous. Also, new AEDs offer favorable side benefits for concurrent diseases and conditions. Patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury often present with psychiatric/behavioral symptoms and cognitive impairment and some new AEDs alleviate such symptoms. This review presents an outline of the new AEDs used to treat adult patients based on the pharmacological activity of the drugs and discusses possible clinical indications from the perspective of underlying causative diseases and comorbidities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest (COI) regarding this article according to the criteria of The Japan Neurosurgical Society. All authors completed the self-reported COI Disclosure Statement form via the website of the society. Conflicts of Interest Disclosure |
ISSN: | 0470-8105 1349-8029 |
DOI: | 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0344 |