Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy
The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest. We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and op...
Saved in:
Published in | Drug and alcohol dependence Vol. 126; no. 1-2; pp. 189 - 194 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01.11.2012
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0376-8716 1879-0046 1879-0046 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest.
We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation.
Men, younger people, those of Māori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Māori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated.
The findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest.BACKGROUNDThe continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest.We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation.METHODSWe analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation.Men, younger people, those of Māori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Māori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated.RESULTSMen, younger people, those of Māori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Māori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated.The findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation.CONCLUSIONThe findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation. Background: The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest. Methods: We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation. Results: Men, younger people, those of Maori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Maori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated. Conclusions: The findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation. [Copyright Elsevier Ireland Ltd.] The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest. We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation. Men, younger people, those of Māori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Māori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated. The findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation. Abstract Background The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective non-response biasing the estimates of interest. Methods We analysed non-response bias in a postal survey measuring drinking behaviour, experience of harm and opinion on local government alcohol policies among residents in six New Zealand communities. The Continuum of Resistance model, which suggests that late respondents to a survey are most similar to non-respondents on the measures of interest, was used to guide our investigation. Results Men, younger people, those of Māori descent and those living in more deprived areas were less likely to respond to our survey than women, older people, those not of Māori descent and those living in comparatively affluent areas. Late respondents more closely resembled non-respondents demographically than early respondents. The prevalence of binge drinking and experience of assault was higher, and support for restrictive local government alcohol policies lower, among late respondents. Assuming the drinking behaviour and alcohol-related experiences of non-respondents were the same as those of late respondents, prevalence was under-estimated by 3.4% (relative difference: 13%) and 2.1% (relative difference: 21%) for monthly binge drinking and assault respectively. Policy support was not over-estimated. Conclusion The findings add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that surveys under-estimate risk behaviour because of selective non-response and this bias increases as response rates fall. Notably, public opinion may not be subject to such misestimation. |
Author | Maclennan, Brett Langley, John Room, Robin Kypri, Kypros |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Brett surname: Maclennan fullname: Maclennan, Brett email: brett.maclennan@otago.ac.nz organization: Injury Prevention Research Unit, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand – sequence: 2 givenname: Kypros surname: Kypri fullname: Kypri, Kypros organization: Injury Prevention Research Unit, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand – sequence: 3 givenname: John surname: Langley fullname: Langley, John organization: Injury Prevention Research Unit, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand – sequence: 4 givenname: Robin surname: Room fullname: Room, Robin organization: Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, 54 - 62 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26569825$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22677457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNklFvFCEUhYmpsdvqXzC8mPjgjMAOMPPSWJtWTRp9UJ8JA3cq2xkYYaZx_r1sd5smTYxLSHi455wL3O8EHfngASFMSUkJFe83pY3zje6NhbFkhLKS8JLQ6hla0Vo2BSGVOEIrspaiqCUVx-gkpQ3JSzTkBTpmTEhZcblC89fgiwhpDD4Bbp1O2HmssQnDMHs3LTjN8Q4WHDpso_O3zt-8w7lz-BX6bOz1BBbDnxGiA28gYe0tHue2dwaH0XkXPM5778BjyIXlJXre6T7Bq_15in5eXf64-Fxcf_v05eL8ujC8ZlMhqqq1nNva1tRIIYllgnIrOaVcEAsyFzkTleRtk_9Fs7rrtORGV7VuWcfWp-jtLneM4fcMaVKDSwb6XnsIc1KU1RWRjWQHSdeyokys_y-ltJKEC8az9PVeOrcDWDVGN-i4qIcBZMGbvUAno_suam9cetQJLpr6PuhspzMxpBShU8ZNesq_O0XtekWJ2pKhNuqRDLUlQxGuMhk5oH4S8NDjAOvHnRXyqO4cRJXM_bCti2AmZYM7JOTsSYjpMx35zbewQNqEOfqMgqIqZY_6vmV3iy5lhFApmxzw4d8Bh93hL-bLA3Q |
CODEN | DADEDV |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arteri_2018_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_21959 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13011_019_0243_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychres_2023_115641 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2021_109102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2014_08_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1177_00915521231218208 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_015_2638_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwu207 crossref_primary_10_14367_kjhep_2023_40_5_1 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13023_024_03126_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_addbeh_2022_107439 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_4874 crossref_primary_10_1111_ppe_12328 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_015_2350_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_023_02053_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2017_01_037 crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2020_1760807 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_017_0294_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_017_4189_8 crossref_primary_10_1177_0962280219854482 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_855416 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2458_13_167 crossref_primary_10_1111_add_13797 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0218658 crossref_primary_10_1111_dar_12094 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph16101822 crossref_primary_10_1080_10826084_2021_1954029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmedr_2023_102317 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_018_5481_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_abrep_2015_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41366_022_01154_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_alcalc_agv073 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2288_15_5 crossref_primary_10_2105_AJPH_2013_301643 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2013_002647 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13011_017_0103_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638237_2018_1437602 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2014_07_039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdiacomp_2015_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1071_HE16013 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_020_01073_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_021_10764_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_artere_2018_08_003 crossref_primary_10_3233_SJI_170421 crossref_primary_10_3310_phr06060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugpo_2017_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0174818 crossref_primary_10_2478_nsad_2013_0047 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/0739986304269162 10.1086/269471 10.1093/ije/31.5.1038 10.1177/009145090403100304 10.1371/journal.pone.0035527 10.1177/009145090703400407 10.1080/14034940600996563 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00526.x 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.256 10.2307/3343329 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00077.x 10.1080/16066350902770425 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.017 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00257-0 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.019 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1023 10.3390/ijerph7030827 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.257 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182126442 10.1097/01.ALC.0000121654.99277.26 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier Ireland Ltd 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd – notice: Elsevier Ireland Ltd – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QJ 7TQ DHY DON |
DOI | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) PAIS Index PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) PAIS International |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) PAIS International MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Social Welfare & Social Work |
EISSN | 1879-0046 |
EndPage | 194 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22677457 26569825 10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2012_05_014 S0376871612001779 1_s2_0_S0376871612001779 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | New Zealand |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: New Zealand |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5RE 5VS 6PF 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JO AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXLA AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQJ ABFNM ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMMH ABWVN ABXDB ABZDS ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACIEU ACIUM ACPRK ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGUBO AGWIK AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALCLG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX AVARZ AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M29 M39 M41 MO0 MOBAO N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OGGZJ OH0 OU- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SPCBC SSB SSH SSN SSO SSP SSZ T5K TN5 WH7 Z5R ~G- .GJ 0SF 29G 53G AACTN AAQXK ABMZM ABTAH ADVLN AFCTW AFJKZ AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW AOMHK ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN FEDTE FGOYB G-2 HEG HMK HMO HVGLF H~9 NCXOZ PKN R2- RIG SEW UAP WUQ XPP ZGI ZXP ZY4 AADPK AAIAV AATCM ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU AKYCK EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII APXCP CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QJ 7TQ DHY DON |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-644bd55d8d81c7670d2615d7511560de7d55526475b9101a28ffa75ca48ab2f23 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0376-8716 1879-0046 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 21 11:55:01 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:13:34 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:52:31 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:20 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:21:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:52:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:45 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:28:26 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:04 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:32:39 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1-2 |
Keywords | Alcohol consumption Community survey Public opinion Alcohol policy Alcohol-related harm Non-response bias Consumption Human Drug addiction Ethanol Alcoholism Political aspect Response bias Non response Drinking Public inquiry Public policy Alcoholic beverage Health policy Addiction Danger Public health |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c582t-644bd55d8d81c7670d2615d7511560de7d55526475b9101a28ffa75ca48ab2f23 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 22677457 |
PQID | 1114705625 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1284079722 proquest_miscellaneous_1283741263 proquest_miscellaneous_1114705625 pubmed_primary_22677457 pascalfrancis_primary_26569825 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2012_05_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2012_05_014 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2012_05_014 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0376871612001779 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_drugalcdep_2012_05_014 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2012 text: 2012-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Shannon |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Shannon – name: Ireland |
PublicationTitle | Drug and alcohol dependence |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Drug Alcohol Depend |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ireland Ltd – name: Elsevier |
References | Cohen, Duffy (bib0015) 2002; 18 Langley, Kypri, Stephenson (bib0065) 2003; 327 Wagenaar, Harwood, Toomey, Denk, Zander (bib0115) 2000; 21 Kypri, Stephenson, Langley (bib0055) 2004; 28 Babor, Caetano, Casswell, Edwards, Giesbrecht, Graham, Grube, Hill, Hodler, Homel, Livingston, Osterberg, Rehm, Room, Rossow (bib0005) 2010 Maclennan, Kypri, Langley (bib0075) 2011; 22 Barchielli, Balzi (bib0010) 2002; 31 Gmel, Rehm (bib0030) 2004; 31 Edwards, Roberts, Clarke, Diguiseppi, Wentz, Kwan, Cooper, Felix, Pratap (bib0025) 2009; 8 Dillman (bib0020) 2000 Ialomiteanu, Giesbrecht, Adlaf, Irving, Paglia-Boak, Rehm (bib0045) 2010; 7 Holmila, Mustonen, Sterberg, Raitasalo (bib0040) 2009; 17 Martikainen, Laaksonen, Piha, Lallukka (bib0085) 2007; 35 Wild, Cunningham, Adlaf (bib0120) 2001; 62 Maclennan, Kypri, Langley, Room (bib0080) 2012; 23 Lin, Schaeffer (bib0070) 1995; 59 Pinsky, Sanches, Zaleski, Laranjeira, Caetano (bib0100) 2007; 34 Wilkinson, Room, Livingston (bib0125) 2009; 28 Meiklejohn, Connor, Kypri (bib0135) 2012; 7 Zhao, Stockwell, Macdonald (bib0130) 2009; 28 Harwood, Bernat, Lenk, Vazquez, Wagenaar (bib0035) 2004; 26 University of Otago Wellington School of Medicine and Health Science (bib0105) 2009 Midanik (bib0095) 1988; 83 Lahaut, Jansen, van de Mheen, Garretsen (bib0060) 2002; 37 Kypri, Samaranayaka, Connor, Langley, Maclennan (bib0050) 2011; 53 Van Loon, Tijhuis, Picavet, Surtees, Ormel (bib0110) 2003; 13 Meiklejohn (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0135) 2012; 7 Babor (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0005) 2010 Wild (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0120) 2001; 62 Kypri (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0055) 2004; 28 Kypri (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0050) 2011; 53 Cohen (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0015) 2002; 18 Zhao (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0130) 2009; 28 Langley (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0065) 2003; 327 Dillman (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0020) 2000 Lahaut (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0060) 2002; 37 Edwards (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0025) 2009; 8 Barchielli (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0010) 2002; 31 Harwood (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0035) 2004; 26 Van Loon (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0110) 2003; 13 Wilkinson (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0125) 2009; 28 Gmel (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0030) 2004; 31 Maclennan (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0080) 2012; 23 Lin (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0070) 1995; 59 Maclennan (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0075) 2011; 22 Ialomiteanu (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0045) 2010; 7 University of Otago Wellington School of Medicine and Health Science (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0105) 2009 Martikainen (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0085) 2007; 35 Midanik (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0095) 1988; 83 Wagenaar (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0115) 2000; 21 Holmila (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0040) 2009; 17 Pinsky (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0100) 2007; 34 |
References_xml | – year: 2000 ident: bib0020 article-title: Mail and Internet Surveys – The Tailored Design Method – volume: 8 start-page: MR000008 year: 2009 ident: bib0025 article-title: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – volume: 28 start-page: 648 year: 2009 end-page: 657 ident: bib0130 article-title: Non-response bias in alcohol and drug population surveys publication-title: Drug Alcohol Rev. – year: 2010 ident: bib0005 article-title: Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity – Research and Public Policy – volume: 13 start-page: 105 year: 2003 end-page: 110 ident: bib0110 article-title: Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations publication-title: Ann. Epidemiol. – volume: 28 start-page: 630 year: 2004 end-page: 634 ident: bib0055 article-title: Assessment of nonresponse bias in an Internet survey of alcohol use publication-title: Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. – volume: 26 start-page: 426 year: 2004 end-page: 445 ident: bib0035 article-title: Public opinion in Puerto Rico on alcohol control policies publication-title: Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. – volume: 59 start-page: 236 year: 1995 end-page: 258 ident: bib0070 article-title: Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation publication-title: Public Opin. Q. – volume: 7 start-page: 827 year: 2010 end-page: 841 ident: bib0045 article-title: An exploratory approach to analyzing alcohol control policy opinions held by Ontario adults publication-title: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health – volume: 28 start-page: 263 year: 2009 end-page: 274 ident: bib0125 article-title: Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium publication-title: Drug Alcohol Rev. – volume: 31 start-page: 1038 year: 2002 end-page: 1042 ident: bib0010 article-title: Nine-year follow-up of a survey on smoking habits in Florence (Italy): higher mortality among non-responders publication-title: Int. J. Epidemiol. – volume: 7 start-page: e35527 year: 2012 ident: bib0135 article-title: The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 21 start-page: 303 year: 2000 end-page: 327 ident: bib0115 article-title: Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: results from a National Survey publication-title: J. Public Health Policy – volume: 35 start-page: 212 year: 2007 end-page: 215 ident: bib0085 article-title: Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? publication-title: Scand. J. Public Health – volume: 31 start-page: 467 year: 2004 end-page: 540 ident: bib0030 article-title: Measuring alcohol consumption publication-title: Contemp. Drug Probl. – volume: 62 start-page: 257 year: 2001 end-page: 261 ident: bib0120 article-title: Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers publication-title: J. Stud. Alcohol – volume: 22 start-page: 443 year: 2011 end-page: 444 ident: bib0075 article-title: Distributing surveys: postal versus drop-and-collect publication-title: Epidemiology – volume: 83 start-page: 1019 year: 1988 end-page: 1030 ident: bib0095 article-title: Validity of self-reported alcohol use: a literature review and assessment publication-title: Br. J. Addict. – volume: 34 start-page: 635 year: 2007 end-page: 648 ident: bib0100 article-title: Opinions about alcohol control policies among Brazilians: the first national alcohol survey publication-title: Contemp. Drug Probl. – volume: 17 start-page: 360 year: 2009 end-page: 371 ident: bib0040 article-title: Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms publication-title: Addict. Res. Theory – volume: 327 start-page: 1023 year: 2003 end-page: 1024 ident: bib0065 article-title: Secondhand effects of alcohol use among university students: computerised survey publication-title: BMJ – volume: 18 start-page: 13 year: 2002 end-page: 23 ident: bib0015 article-title: Are nonrespondents to health surveys less healthy than respondents? publication-title: J. Off. Stat. – volume: 37 start-page: 256 year: 2002 end-page: 260 ident: bib0060 article-title: Non-response bias in a sample survey on alcohol consumption publication-title: Alcohol Alcohol. – year: 2009 ident: bib0105 article-title: New Zealand Deprivation Index 2006 – volume: 53 start-page: 274 year: 2011 end-page: 277 ident: bib0050 article-title: Non-response bias in a web-based health behaviour survey of New Zealand tertiary students publication-title: Prev. Med. – volume: 23 start-page: 45 year: 2012 end-page: 53 ident: bib0080 article-title: Public sentiment towards alcohol and local government alcohol policies in New Zealand publication-title: Int. J. Drug Policy – volume: 26 start-page: 426 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0035 article-title: Public opinion in Puerto Rico on alcohol control policies publication-title: Hisp. J. Behav. Sci. doi: 10.1177/0739986304269162 – volume: 59 start-page: 236 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0070 article-title: Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation publication-title: Public Opin. Q. doi: 10.1086/269471 – volume: 31 start-page: 1038 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0010 article-title: Nine-year follow-up of a survey on smoking habits in Florence (Italy): higher mortality among non-responders publication-title: Int. J. Epidemiol. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.5.1038 – volume: 31 start-page: 467 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0030 article-title: Measuring alcohol consumption publication-title: Contemp. Drug Probl. doi: 10.1177/009145090403100304 – volume: 7 start-page: e35527 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0135 article-title: The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035527 – volume: 34 start-page: 635 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0100 article-title: Opinions about alcohol control policies among Brazilians: the first national alcohol survey publication-title: Contemp. Drug Probl. doi: 10.1177/009145090703400407 – volume: 8 start-page: MR000008 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0025 article-title: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0105 – volume: 35 start-page: 212 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0085 article-title: Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? publication-title: Scand. J. Public Health doi: 10.1080/14034940600996563 – volume: 83 start-page: 1019 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0095 article-title: Validity of self-reported alcohol use: a literature review and assessment publication-title: Br. J. Addict. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb00526.x – volume: 37 start-page: 256 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0060 article-title: Non-response bias in a sample survey on alcohol consumption publication-title: Alcohol Alcohol. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.256 – volume: 21 start-page: 303 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0115 article-title: Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: results from a National Survey publication-title: J. Public Health Policy doi: 10.2307/3343329 – volume: 18 start-page: 13 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0015 article-title: Are nonrespondents to health surveys less healthy than respondents? publication-title: J. Off. Stat. – volume: 28 start-page: 648 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0130 article-title: Non-response bias in alcohol and drug population surveys publication-title: Drug Alcohol Rev. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00077.x – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0020 – volume: 17 start-page: 360 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0040 article-title: Public opinion and community-based prevention of alcohol-related harms publication-title: Addict. Res. Theory doi: 10.1080/16066350902770425 – volume: 53 start-page: 274 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0050 article-title: Non-response bias in a web-based health behaviour survey of New Zealand tertiary students publication-title: Prev. Med. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.017 – volume: 13 start-page: 105 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0110 article-title: Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations publication-title: Ann. Epidemiol. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00257-0 – volume: 23 start-page: 45 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0080 article-title: Public sentiment towards alcohol and local government alcohol policies in New Zealand publication-title: Int. J. Drug Policy doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.019 – volume: 28 start-page: 263 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0125 article-title: Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium publication-title: Drug Alcohol Rev. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x – volume: 327 start-page: 1023 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0065 article-title: Secondhand effects of alcohol use among university students: computerised survey publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1023 – volume: 7 start-page: 827 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0045 article-title: An exploratory approach to analyzing alcohol control policy opinions held by Ontario adults publication-title: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph7030827 – volume: 62 start-page: 257 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0120 article-title: Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers publication-title: J. Stud. Alcohol doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.257 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0005 – volume: 22 start-page: 443 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0075 article-title: Distributing surveys: postal versus drop-and-collect publication-title: Epidemiology doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182126442 – volume: 28 start-page: 630 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014_bib0055 article-title: Assessment of nonresponse bias in an Internet survey of alcohol use publication-title: Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000121654.99277.26 |
SSID | ssj0000690 |
Score | 2.2803447 |
Snippet | The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective... Abstract Background The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of... Background: The continuing decline in response rates to household surveys is a concern for the health and social sciences as it increases the risk of selective... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 189 |
SubjectTerms | Addictive behaviors Adolescent Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aged Alcohol Alcohol consumption Alcohol Drinking - epidemiology Alcohol Drinking - psychology Alcohol policy Alcohol related Alcohol-related harm Alcoholism Alcoholism and acute alcohol poisoning Attitude Bias Binge drinking Biological and medical sciences Community survey Data Interpretation, Statistical Demography Female Health Surveys Humans Legislation as Topic - trends Local government Male Maoris Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous New Zealand New Zealand - epidemiology New Zealand - ethnology Non-response bias Prevalence Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public Opinion Response rate Sex Factors Socioeconomic Factors Surveys Toxicology Young Adult |
Title | Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0376871612001779 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0376871612001779 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22677457 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1114705625 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1283741263 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1284079722 |
Volume | 126 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fb9MwELam8YKEEL8JG9UhIZ4ITRy7TsTTNDEVEH2Bib1ZduxIhSmpknbSXvjbuYuTjgk2VULqS9K7NrHP5--Su-8Ye-2L1Ge8FLHAzSQWtlCxzYnIVfjEiiIrbU9g-mUxm5-KT2fybI8dj7UwlFY5-P7g03tvPZyZDqM5XS2X068Jrg2C-ymlBSlFRXxCKLLyd7_SP7xxeM6CwjFJD9k8IcfLtRv0w6XzxFxJTwWJw1PctEXdW5kOB64KHS9uhqT91nTygN0fMCUchct-yPZ8_YgdhsJb-O7PK9N6eAPjiab9-ZhtFk0dtyFB1oNdmg6WNRgoQ8HI-hK6TXvhL6GpwLWhwcJbMKGhbtxXwHgHfkuU3IGpHQTSbKAiLJxvwM-gAauef_gJOz358O14Hg8tGOJS5nwdI1qyTkqXuzwt1UwlDiMu6RTCNIRKziv8UiKmUtIi7kgNz6vKKElU6cbyimdP2X7d1P45A1UlorSZwZhbEs1fzg13-PsUo6WuLCKmxlHX5cBPTm0yzvWYiPZDX82XpvnSidSoHrF0q7kKHB076BTjxOqxBhW9psaNZAdd9S9d3w3Lv9Op7lBY_2WiEXu_1bxm5Tv-7-SaBW5vliMoLzDUj9ir0SQ1egl69WNq32w6ivOEIqx7mwwRIeGSnWW3yohEFYrziD0LNn91FXyGsYRUL_7rJg_YXToK5Z6HbH_dbvxLxH1rO-kX9oTdOfr4eb74DdEdV84 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fa9swED669GGDMvZ73rpOg7GnmdiyFNnsqZSVdG3zspb1TUiWDNmKHeyk0P9-J0tOV7aWwMBPts6WpdPpO_vuO4CPtkhtRksWM9xMYqYLEevcEbkym2hWZKXuCUxPZ5PpOft2wS-24GDIhXFhlcH2e5veW-twZhxGc7yYz8ffE1wbDu6nLixIiOIBbDt2Kj6C7f2j4-nsD4PsP7Vg-9gJhIAeH-Zl2hWa4tJYR17pPgw6Gk921y61s1Adjl3li17cjUr73enwCTwOsJLs-54_hS1bP4Ndn3tLftjLSrWWfCLDiab99RxWs6aOWx8ja4meq47Ma6JI6XNGltekW7VX9po0FTGtr7HwmShfUzfuk2CsIXbNldwRVRviebOJy8PCKSd4BAmy6CmIX8D54dezg2kcqjDEJc_pMkbApA3nJjd5WoqJSAw6XdwIRGqIlowVeJEjrBJcI_RIFc2rSgnu2NKVphXNXsKobmr7GoioElbqTKHbzR3TX04VNXh_56alpiwiEMOoyzJQlLtKGZdyiEX7KW_mS7r5kgmXKB5BupZceJqODWSKYWLlkIaKhlPiXrKBrPiXrO2CBehkKjtsLP_S0gi-rCVvKfqGz927pYHrl6WIywv09iP4MKikREPh_v6o2jarzrl6TDi4e18bx4WEq3aS3duGJaIQlEbwyuv8TS_oBN0JLt7810u-h4fTs9MTeXI0O34Lj9wVn_25C6Nlu7LvEAYu9V5Y5r8BaSNafw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-response+bias+in+a+community+survey+of+drinking%2C+alcohol-related+experiences+and+public+opinion+on+alcohol+policy&rft.jtitle=Drug+and+alcohol+dependence&rft.au=Maclennan%2C+Brett&rft.au=Kypri%2C+Kypros&rft.au=Langley%2C+John&rft.au=Room%2C+Robin&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.issn=0376-8716&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.drugalcdep.2012.05.014&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0376871612001779&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0376871612001779 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03768716%2FS0376871612X00139%2Fcov150h.gif |