Comparative effects of selenium-enriched lactobacilli and selenium-enriched yeast on performance, egg selenium enrichment, antioxidant capacity, and ileal microbiota in laying hens
Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while sel...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of animal science and biotechnology Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 27 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central
19.02.2025
BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.
SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.
SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.BACKGROUNDOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.RESULTSSeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.CONCLUSIONSeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. Abstract Background Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. Results SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. Conclusion SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. BACKGROUND: Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. RESULTS: SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. CONCLUSION: SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. BackgroundOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.ResultsSeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.ConclusionSeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition. |
ArticleNumber | 27 |
Author | Zhang, Longfei Qi, Guanghai Qiu, Kai Wu, Shugeng Zhang, Haijun Zhou, Jianmin Obianwuna, Uchechukwu Edna Liu, Yongli Wang, Jing |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jianmin surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Jianmin – sequence: 2 givenname: Uchechukwu Edna surname: Obianwuna fullname: Obianwuna, Uchechukwu Edna – sequence: 3 givenname: Longfei surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Longfei – sequence: 4 givenname: Yongli surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Yongli – sequence: 5 givenname: Haijun surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Haijun – sequence: 6 givenname: Kai surname: Qiu fullname: Qiu, Kai – sequence: 7 givenname: Jing surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jing – sequence: 8 givenname: Guanghai surname: Qi fullname: Qi, Guanghai – sequence: 9 givenname: Shugeng surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Shugeng |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFks1uEzEQgFeoiJbSF-CALHHhkAX_7Hq9J4QifipV4gJna9YeJ4527WBvKvJePCBuUqIWIeHLWPanzzPjeV6dhRiwql4y-pYxJd_lhjLa1JS3NWVM0lo-qS44bfqaqZ6dPdifV1c5b2hZkndCsWfVueh7KXvaXVS_lnHaQoLZ3yJB59DMmURHMo4Y_G6qMSRv1mjJCGaOAxg_jp5AsP9A9gh5JjGQLSYX0wTB4ILganViyZGdMMyLIpl9_OlticTAtqjn_eKg9iPCSCZvUhx8nIH4UN7f-7Aiawz5RfXUwZjx6j5eVt8_ffy2_FLffP18vfxwU5tW8bluAAfe9Uy6rhTWgBpY1wiHLaieD7YzyvXWSWjADQ0Iq7B0U6qeUuiUQCsuq-uj10bY6G3yE6S9juD14SCmlYY0ezOiBtNCI5SkjR0a1g7KOIDODkUn2g5ccb0_ura7YUJrSgcSjI-kj2-CX-tVvNXlt0UnqSiGN_eGFH_sMM968tngOELAuMtacEpFK6Xi_0eZVKLnsm0L-vovdBN3KZS2HijW8lbdUa8eZn9K-88gFYAfgfJlOSd0J4TRuxKkPg6sLi3Wh4HVUvwGh_Dh9Q |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.057 10.1093/ps/84.2.232 10.3390/ani11020281 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103224 10.1079/wps20020026 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.073 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.123 10.1093/ps/84.12.1900 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 10.1007/s12011-017-1169-x 10.1155/2019/9613090 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.992 10.1080/10495398.2023.2258188 10.1007/s12011-022-03120-x 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102983 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.040 10.1021/jf202014k 10.5713/ab.22.0067 10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x 10.3390/ani12081006 10.1080/1828051x.2023.2301446 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380713 10.2298/AVB0403191T 10.1186/s40104-021-00587-x 10.1111/1462-2920.13658 10.2527/jas.2012-5825 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.024 10.5713/ajas.14.0593 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041 10.3390/molecules27092995 10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z 10.1007/s11259-021-09867-3 10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.05.005 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.009 10.1128/mcb.00293-12 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120156 10.1128/aem.04050-14 10.3382/ps.0610478 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102433 10.3390/antibiotics11091265 10.1093/ps/86.4.727 10.21037/cdt-20-883 10.5713/ajas.2009.80202 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.057 10.1038/s41467-022-28385-7 10.1021/es101843x 10.2147/ijn.S374024 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103347 10.3390/ani11061681 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117301 10.1074/jbc.M105395200 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101478 10.3390/ijms222111646 10.3389/fimmu.2022.928865 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100374 10.1080/00071660802236021 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635333 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134435 10.1021/bi00210a001 10.3382/ps.2009-00250 10.3382/ps/pey597 10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127140 10.3382/ps/pex216 10.1007/s12011-022-03117-6 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.04.001 10.3382/ps.2014-04301 10.3390/antiox9101028 10.3389/fmed.2021.716816 10.1093/clinchem/43.7.1209 10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.020 10.1038/cddis.2014.574 10.1073/pnas.1611576114 10.3390/foods10040871 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101570 10.4141/CJAS07102 10.1093/jn/132.11.3411 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). Copyright BioMed Central Dec 2025 The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: Copyright BioMed Central Dec 2025 – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7X2 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ L6V LK8 M0K M7P M7S P5Z P62 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s40104-025-01160-6 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Engineering Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering collection MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA PubMed Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Agriculture |
EISSN | 2049-1891 |
EndPage | 27 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af PMC11837603 39966907 10_1186_s40104_025_01160_6 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GroupedDBID | -04 -0D -SD -S~ 0R~ 5VR 5VS 7X2 8FE 8FG 8FH 92G 92I 92M 9D9 9DD AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABJCF ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH ARAPS ATCPS BAPOH BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BMC C6C CAJED CCEZO CCPQU CHBEP CHDYS CITATION EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECGQY EMK EPL ESX EYRJQ FA0 GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HYE IAO IGS IHR ISR ITC JUIAU KQ8 L6V LK8 M0K M7P M7S OK1 P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC PTHSS Q-- Q-3 R-D RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV RT4 SBL SOJ T8T TCJ TGD TUS U1F U1G U5D U5N ~MN NPM PQGLB 3V. 8FK ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-4aeb27916f7ffe4a8b1743fe5a892bd7c8f9df6a4afb4a3d8e02568900a783ed3 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 2049-1891 1674-9782 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:29 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:28:38 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:31:07 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:51:50 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 24 10:11:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:30:18 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Gut microbiota Egg selenium Laying hen Antioxidant capacity Feed efficiency Selenium-enriched lactobacilli Selenium-enriched yeast |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c582t-4aeb27916f7ffe4a8b1743fe5a892bd7c8f9df6a4afb4a3d8e02568900a783ed3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168152585?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 39966907 |
PQID | 3168152585 |
PQPubID | 2040221 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11837603 proquest_miscellaneous_3200356682 proquest_miscellaneous_3168392655 proquest_journals_3168152585 pubmed_primary_39966907 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40104_025_01160_6 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-02-19 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-02-19 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2025 text: 2025-02-19 day: 19 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Journal of animal science and biotechnology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Sci Biotechnol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | I Yoon (1160_CR47) 2007; 86 XJ Wei (1160_CR78) 2023; 299 Y Li (1160_CR3) 2024; 103 CL Pan (1160_CR25) 2011; 59 L Zhang (1160_CR19) 2023; 402 CA Zuberbuehler (1160_CR9) 2002; 132 M Mohiti-Asli (1160_CR42) 2008; 88 RS Glass (1160_CR67) 1993; 32 National Research Council (NRC) (1160_CR48) 2005 M Todorović (1160_CR50) 2004; 54 W Liu (1160_CR71) 2024; 103 HC Wang (1160_CR65) 2022; 201 M Baylan (1160_CR38) 2011; 143 LC Tan (1160_CR6) 2016; 34 1160_CR17 National Medical Products Administration of the People's Republic of China (1160_CR32) 2017 FG Martínez (1160_CR2) 2019; 123 H Liu (1160_CR8) 2017; 184 M Jlali (1160_CR21) 2013; 91 R Kang (1160_CR72) 2022; 13 WH Wang (1160_CR41) 2022; 12 PL Utterback (1160_CR44) 2005; 84 RL Payne (1160_CR43) 2005; 84 GX Sun (1160_CR7) 2010; 44 AI Muhammad (1160_CR26) 2021; 46 1160_CR60 U Gophna (1160_CR81) 2017; 19 F Register (1160_CR16) 2002; 67 JM Zhou (1160_CR37) 2023 JM Zhou (1160_CR82) 2021; 12 L Zhang (1160_CR4) 2021; 285 S Khan (1160_CR77) 2020; 11 Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (1160_CR31) 2004 MK Zhu (1160_CR59) 2020; 99 M-O Lee (1160_CR68) 2019; 520 E Delezie (1160_CR15) 2014; 93 M Skřivan (1160_CR23) 2008; 49 S Li (1160_CR33) 2021; 12 BS Lopes (1160_CR79) 2022; 27 Q Zhang (1160_CR76) 2021; 11 F Mohammadsadeghi (1160_CR24) 2023; 102 J Feng (1160_CR84) 2023; 102 PF Surai (1160_CR45) 2015; 28 YF Gu (1160_CR58) 2021; 100 A Okado-Matsumoto (1160_CR55) 2001; 276 Z Liu (1160_CR73) 2022; 10 AH Cantor (1160_CR49) 1982; 61 J Reunanen (1160_CR80) 2015; 81 Y Sun (1160_CR83) 2022; 11 LA Seale (1160_CR66) 2012; 32 SR Tan (1160_CR63) 2022; 201 J Lu (1160_CR10) 2019; 98 MM Zhao (1160_CR13) 2021; 15 Z Wu (1160_CR28) 2021; 8 M Esfahani-Mashhour (1160_CR39) 2009; 22 AI Muhammad (1160_CR40) 2021; 10 M Navarro-Alarcon (1160_CR52) 2008; 400 GD Jones (1160_CR5) 2017; 114 AP Mörschbächer (1160_CR1) 2018; 255 Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (1160_CR18) 2008 AI Muhammad (1160_CR36) 2021; 11 ASA Mohamed (1160_CR61) 2024; 23 S Kang (1160_CR27) 2020; 9 J Burger (1160_CR30) 2013; 443 D Kang (1160_CR62) 2022; 13 A Nandi (1160_CR56) 2019; 2019 EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) (1160_CR20) 2009; 992 J Jung (1160_CR69) 2021; 22 J Lu (1160_CR12) 2020; 99 F Nielsen (1160_CR57) 1997; 43 KJ Livak (1160_CR35) 2001; 25 J Liu (1160_CR14) 2023; 77 RL Li (1160_CR75) 2024; 35 J Xu (1160_CR64) 2015; 6 XJ Han (1160_CR54) 2017; 96 T Meng (1160_CR11) 2019; 189 A Chantiratikul (1160_CR22) 2023; 36 L Letavayová (1160_CR51) 2008; 638 PF Surai (1160_CR46) 2019; 58 L Qiao (1160_CR29) 2022; 17 P Janczyk (1160_CR74) 2009; 88 R Xiao (1160_CR34) 2021; 11 M Eşrefoǧlu (1160_CR53) 2009; 29 J Lv (1160_CR70) 2022; 101 |
References_xml | – volume: 255 start-page: 182 year: 2018 ident: 1160_CR1 publication-title: Food Chem doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.057 – volume: 84 start-page: 232 year: 2005 ident: 1160_CR43 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1093/ps/84.2.232 – volume: 11 start-page: 281 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR76 publication-title: Animals (Basel) doi: 10.3390/ani11020281 – volume: 103 start-page: 103224 year: 2024 ident: 1160_CR71 publication-title: Poult Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103224 – volume: 58 start-page: 333 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR46 publication-title: World’s Poult Sci J. doi: 10.1079/wps20020026 – volume: 99 start-page: 3215 year: 2020 ident: 1160_CR59 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.073 – volume: 520 start-page: 406 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR68 publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.123 – volume: 84 start-page: 1900 year: 2005 ident: 1160_CR44 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1093/ps/84.12.1900 – volume: 25 start-page: 402 year: 2001 ident: 1160_CR35 publication-title: Methods doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 – volume: 184 start-page: 16 year: 2017 ident: 1160_CR8 publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res doi: 10.1007/s12011-017-1169-x – volume: 2019 start-page: 9613090 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR56 publication-title: Oxid Med Cell Longev doi: 10.1155/2019/9613090 – volume: 992 start-page: 1 year: 2009 ident: 1160_CR20 publication-title: EFSA J. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.992 – volume: 35 start-page: 2258188 year: 2024 ident: 1160_CR75 publication-title: Anim Biotechnol doi: 10.1080/10495398.2023.2258188 – volume: 201 start-page: 368 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR63 publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03120-x – volume: 102 start-page: 102983 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR24 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102983 – volume: 443 start-page: 278 year: 2013 ident: 1160_CR30 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.040 – volume: 59 start-page: 11424 year: 2011 ident: 1160_CR25 publication-title: J Agric Food Chem doi: 10.1021/jf202014k – volume: 36 start-page: 484 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR22 publication-title: Anim Biosci doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0067 – volume: 143 start-page: 957 year: 2011 ident: 1160_CR38 publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res doi: 10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x – volume: 12 start-page: 1006 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR41 publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani12081006 – volume: 23 start-page: 275 year: 2024 ident: 1160_CR61 publication-title: Ital J Anim Sci doi: 10.1080/1828051x.2023.2301446 – ident: 1160_CR60 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380713 – volume: 54 start-page: 191 year: 2004 ident: 1160_CR50 publication-title: Acta vet (Beogr) doi: 10.2298/AVB0403191T – volume: 12 start-page: 65 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR33 publication-title: J Anim Sci Biotechnol doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00587-x – volume: 19 start-page: 835 year: 2017 ident: 1160_CR81 publication-title: Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13658 – volume: 91 start-page: 1745 year: 2013 ident: 1160_CR21 publication-title: J Anim Sci doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5825 – volume: 67 start-page: 46850 year: 2002 ident: 1160_CR16 publication-title: Fed Regist – ident: 1160_CR17 – volume: 400 start-page: 115 year: 2008 ident: 1160_CR52 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.024 – volume: 28 start-page: 730 year: 2015 ident: 1160_CR45 publication-title: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0593 – volume: 99 start-page: 6267 year: 2020 ident: 1160_CR12 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041 – volume: 27 start-page: 2995 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR79 publication-title: Molecules doi: 10.3390/molecules27092995 – volume: 189 start-page: 548 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR11 publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z – volume: 46 start-page: 431 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR26 publication-title: Vet Res Commun doi: 10.1007/s11259-021-09867-3 – volume: 11 start-page: 29 year: 2020 ident: 1160_CR77 publication-title: J Anim Sci Biotechnol doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7 – volume: 34 start-page: 886 year: 2016 ident: 1160_CR6 publication-title: Biotechnol Adv doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.05.005 – volume: 638 start-page: 1 year: 2008 ident: 1160_CR51 publication-title: Mutat Res doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.009 – volume: 32 start-page: 4141 year: 2012 ident: 1160_CR66 publication-title: Mol Cell Biol doi: 10.1128/mcb.00293-12 – volume: 29 start-page: 1660 year: 2009 ident: 1160_CR53 publication-title: Turkiye Klin J Med Sci – volume: 299 start-page: 120156 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR78 publication-title: Carbohydr Polym doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120156 – volume: 81 start-page: 3655 year: 2015 ident: 1160_CR80 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/aem.04050-14 – volume: 61 start-page: 478 year: 1982 ident: 1160_CR49 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.3382/ps.0610478 – volume: 102 start-page: 102433 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR84 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102433 – volume: 11 start-page: 1265 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR83 publication-title: Antibiotics doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091265 – volume: 86 start-page: 727 year: 2007 ident: 1160_CR47 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.727 – volume: 11 start-page: 744 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR34 publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-883 – volume: 22 start-page: 254 year: 2009 ident: 1160_CR39 publication-title: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci doi: 10.5713/ajas.2009.80202 – volume: 123 start-page: 115 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR2 publication-title: Food Res Int doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.057 – volume: 13 start-page: 779 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR62 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28385-7 – volume: 44 start-page: 6706 year: 2010 ident: 1160_CR7 publication-title: Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1021/es101843x – volume: 17 start-page: 4807 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR29 publication-title: Int J Nanomedicine doi: 10.2147/ijn.S374024 – volume: 103 start-page: 103347 year: 2024 ident: 1160_CR3 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103347 – volume: 11 start-page: 1681 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR36 publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani11061681 – volume: 285 start-page: 117301 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR4 publication-title: Environ Pollut doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117301 – volume: 276 start-page: 38388 year: 2001 ident: 1160_CR55 publication-title: J Biol Chem doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105395200 – volume-title: Mineral tolerances of animals: second year: 2005 ident: 1160_CR48 – volume: 100 start-page: 101478 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR58 publication-title: Poult Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101478 – volume: 22 start-page: 11646 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR69 publication-title: Int J Mol Sci doi: 10.3390/ijms222111646 – volume: 13 start-page: 928865 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR72 publication-title: Front Immunol doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.928865 – volume: 15 start-page: 100374 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR13 publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100374 – volume: 49 start-page: 482 year: 2008 ident: 1160_CR23 publication-title: Br Poult Sci doi: 10.1080/00071660802236021 – volume: 12 start-page: 635333 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR82 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635333 – volume-title: Approved feed additives year: 2008 ident: 1160_CR18 – volume: 402 start-page: 134435 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR19 publication-title: Food Chem doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134435 – volume: 32 start-page: 12555 year: 1993 ident: 1160_CR67 publication-title: Biochemistry doi: 10.1021/bi00210a001 – volume: 88 start-page: 2324 year: 2009 ident: 1160_CR74 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00250 – volume: 98 start-page: 2522 year: 2019 ident: 1160_CR10 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.3382/ps/pey597 – volume: 77 start-page: 127140 year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR14 publication-title: J Trace Elem Med Biol doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127140 – volume: 96 start-page: 3973 year: 2017 ident: 1160_CR54 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.3382/ps/pex216 – volume: 201 start-page: 139 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR65 publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03117-6 – volume: 10 start-page: 124 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR73 publication-title: Anim Nutr doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.04.001 – volume: 93 start-page: 3083 year: 2014 ident: 1160_CR15 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04301 – volume: 9 start-page: 1028 year: 2020 ident: 1160_CR27 publication-title: Antioxidants doi: 10.3390/antiox9101028 – volume: 8 start-page: 716816 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR28 publication-title: Front Med (Lausanne) doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.716816 – volume-title: GB 5009.93–2017 National food safety standard-Determination of selenium in foods year: 2017 ident: 1160_CR32 – volume: 43 start-page: 1209 year: 1997 ident: 1160_CR57 publication-title: Clin Chem doi: 10.1093/clinchem/43.7.1209 – year: 2023 ident: 1160_CR37 publication-title: J Integr Agric doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.020 – volume: 6 start-page: e1616 year: 2015 ident: 1160_CR64 publication-title: Cell Death Dis doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.574 – volume: 114 start-page: 2848 year: 2017 ident: 1160_CR5 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611576114 – volume: 10 start-page: 871 year: 2021 ident: 1160_CR40 publication-title: Foods doi: 10.3390/foods10040871 – volume: 101 start-page: 101570 year: 2022 ident: 1160_CR70 publication-title: Poult Sci doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101570 – volume: 88 start-page: 475 year: 2008 ident: 1160_CR42 publication-title: Can J Anim Sci doi: 10.4141/CJAS07102 – volume: 132 start-page: 3411 year: 2002 ident: 1160_CR9 publication-title: J Nutr doi: 10.1093/jn/132.11.3411 – volume-title: NY/T—2004 Feeding standard of chicken year: 2004 ident: 1160_CR31 |
SSID | ssj0000627381 |
Score | 2.3473947 |
Snippet | Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its... BackgroundOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing... BACKGROUND: Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues,... Abstract Background Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 27 |
SubjectTerms | Albumen Alkaline phosphatase animals antioxidant activity Antioxidant capacity antioxidant enzymes Antioxidants Aspartate transaminase Bacteria Bioaccumulation Bioavailability Birds blood serum Climate change color Deposition Diet dose response egg quality Egg selenium Eggs Enrichment Enzymatic activity Enzymes Feed additives Feed efficiency Feeds Food Food additives Gene expression Gut microbiota Ileum Lactobacilli Lactobacillus Laying hen Liver Metabolism Microbiota Microorganisms mRNA Nutrient deficiency Nutrition Nutrition research Oxidative stress Poultry Poultry nutrition Probiotics Reactive oxygen species Selenium Selenium-enriched lactobacilli Sodium Soybeans Toxicity Transaminase villi Villus Yeast yeasts |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp_RQmj7dpEWF3roiXluS5WMaEkKhPTWQm9BzY2i0IdmF5n_lB3ZG8m52S2gvPS1eD7KlGWnmk0ffEPKp57X1omuYD7xjHHwMM84Ixqcu9r2dWpX3Ib99l2fn_OuFuNgo9YU5YYUeuAzcoXHC8FbJmnsLzsYqF43pvJXgaEVnIq6-4PM2wFRZg_HIyXR1SkbJw1uOyINh9Vb89gCYacsTZcL-x6LMP5MlN7zP6XPybAwb6VF53T3yJKQX5OnR7GakzghwtUEt-JLcHz_QetMxaYPOI8XiSmlYXjGwG8wC9fQnVtyxxuHGCzXJPyJyhwV-6DzR64djBhMaZrO1LC2yuNU4gUZA278GD7_UgTN2EOlPctOwBEEvrobC_rQwdEjwfDxpRS8BT78i56cnP47P2FihgTmhmgXjBoB5BxFm7KAj3CiLACcGYVTfWN85FXsfpeEmWm5arwKGWKqva9OpNvj2NdlJ8xTeEgpBvlcq1pbHyKPobYZWjWwjLDpctBX5vNKWvi5EHDoDGCV10a2GtnXWrZYV-YIKXUsiiXb-A0xLj6al_2VaFTlYmYMeZ_atxkJfWDNKiYp8XN-GOYkfWkwK82WRgbhTir_JZCpaKVVTkTfFwtZv2yII7euuImrL9ra6s30nDZeZGxzGA9Oc2nf_YwD2yW6TJ0zDpv0B2VncLMN7iMEW9kOebr8BIF00KQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Comparative effects of selenium-enriched lactobacilli and selenium-enriched yeast on performance, egg selenium enrichment, antioxidant capacity, and ileal microbiota in laying hens |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966907 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168152585 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168392655 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3200356682 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11837603 https://doaj.org/article/ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swED_W5GV7GPuety5osLdF1LElW34aSdesDFbGWKFvRrKs1NDaWT6g_b_2B-5OdpJmlD6FxIci-T50dzr9DuBTJkJjZRpxW4qUC9xjuC605GJUuCwzI6N8HvLHWXJ6Lr5fyIsu4bbsyio3NtEbatsUlCM_ogZL1KtHyS_zP5y6RtHpatdC4wD6aIKV6kF_cnL289c2y0IgvLHvVErV9hxDpmhzc0YlR0tB0Qinjq50HoFx1N7u5EH87_M8_y-gvLMjTZ_B086VZOOW98_hUVm_gCfj2aKD0yjx2x24wZfw93gH9c26Qg7WOEYNl-pqfc1Rlqgy1LIr6sJjdEHJGKZrew_JLTX9YU3N5rurB0NWzmZbWtbSUvpxiIOgBNxUFj9ZgRt0gd7_0A-NZglXcV21iFArzaoa_59uX7FLjLFfwfn05PfxKe-6NvBCqmjFhcZgPUWv06W4EKGVoaDHlVKrLDI2LZTLrEu00M4IHVtVktulsjDUqYpLG7-GXt3U5Vtg6PhbpVxohHPCycz4cCtKYoeGSMg4gM8bbuXzFpwj90GNSvKWtzmOnXve5kkAE2LolpKAtf0PzWKWd3qa60JqEaskFNagb2NU4bROrcEJxjLVLoDDjTjknbYv851sBvBx-xj1lA5fdF0265YGfdFEPkTj4WmTREUBvGklbDvbmALTLEwDUHuyt7ec_Sd1denxwvF9UOlT_O7hub-Hx5FXhYiPskPorRbr8gN6XCszgAM1_TaA_njydTIddEo28PmLf_AsMXA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOQAHxLMEChgJTtRqNrYT54BQKSxb-ji1Um_Bju3tSjRZ9iHon-LED2TGSXa7qOqtp1U2I8fJjMfz2eP5CHmbi9hYmSXMOpExAXMM06WWTPRKn-emZ1RYhzw8Sgcn4tupPF0jf7qzMJhW2fnE4KhtXeIa-TYSLCFXj5Ifxz8Zskbh7mpHodGYxb67-AWQbfph7zPo912S9L8c7w5YyyrASqmSGRMawGQGUZHPvHdCK4NBuXdSqzwxNiuVz61PtdDeCM2tchgWqDyOdaa4sxzavUVuCw4zOZ5M739drOlgyV8eeFExt58BQEu6czoq3Z4KxD4M-WNx9wNQ28pcGCgDropz_0_XvDT_9R-Q-23gSncaS3tI1lz1iNzbGU7a4h0Ori4VN3xM_u4uC4vTNm2E1p4ivVM1mp8zsFzMQ7X0B3L-GF3i0g_Vlb1C5AIphmhd0fHyoMMWdcPhQpY2srjYuQWNgL39Hln4pSWEAyVgja3QNDhBeIvzUVN_aqbpqILn41kvegaI_gk5uRFtPiXrVV25Z4QCzLBK-dgI74WXuQngLkm5B7cnJI_I-05bxbgpBVIECKXSotFtAW0XQbdFGpFPqNCFJJbxDn_Uk2HReoVCl1ILrtJYWAORlFGl1zqzBjrIZaZ9RDY7cyha3zItliMhIm8Wt8Er4FaPrlw9b2Qg8k3ldTKhGG6aqiQiG42FLXrLEQbncRYRtWJ7K6-zeqcanYXq5PA9MNGKP7--76_JncHx4UFxsHe0_4LcTcKwSFgv3yTrs8ncvYRYb2ZehQFGyfebHtH_AFQZax8 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELdGJyF4QHwTGGAkeKJW08RJnAeE9lVtDKoJMWlvxo7trhJLSj8E-7944q_jzknaFU1721OV5uQ4ufP5fvb5foS8zXmoTZJFzFieMQ5zDFOFShjvFy7PdV8Lvw75ZZgenPBPp8npBvnbnoXBtMrWJ3pHbaoC18h7SLCEXD0i6bkmLeJ4b_Bx8pMhgxTutLZ0GrWJHNmLXwDfZh8O90DX76JosP9t94A1DAOsSEQ0Z1wBsMwgQnKZc5YroTFAdzZRIo-0yQrhcuNSxZXTXMVGWAwRRB6GKhOxNTG0e4tsZoiKOmRzZ394_HW5woMFgGPPkoqZ_gzgWtSe2hFpb8YRCTFkk8W9EMBwazOjJxC4Kur9P3nz0mw4uE_uNWEs3a7t7gHZsOVDcnd7NG1KeVi4ulTq8BH5s7sqM06bJBJaOYpkT-V4cc7AjjEr1dAfyACkVYELQVSV5gqRCyQcolVJJ6tjD11qR6OlLK1lcemzC42A9f0eG_ilBQQHBSCPrm8aXCK8xfm4rkY1V3RcwvPx5Bc9A3z_mJzciD6fkE5ZlfYZoQA6jBAu1Nw57pJce6gXpbEDJ8iTOCDvW23JSV0YRHpAJVJZ61ZC29LrVqYB2UGFLiWxqLf_o5qOZOMjpCoSxWORhtxoiKu0KJxSmdHQwTjJlAvIVmsOsvE0M7kaFwF5s7wNPgI3flRpq0UtA3Fwmlwn40vjpqmIAvK0trBlb2MExXmYBUSs2d7a66zfKcdnvlY5fA9Mu4qfX9_31-Q2jGb5-XB49ILcifyoiFg_3yKd-XRhX0LgN9evmhFGyfebHtT_AAsncLE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+effects+of+selenium-enriched+lactobacilli+and+selenium-enriched+yeast+on+performance%2C+egg+selenium+enrichment%2C+antioxidant+capacity%2C+and+ileal+microbiota+in+laying+hens&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science+and+biotechnology&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Jianmin&rft.au=Obianwuna%2C+Uchechukwu+Edna&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Longfei&rft.au=Liu%2C+Yongli&rft.date=2025-02-19&rft.issn=2049-1891&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1+p.27-27&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=27&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40104-025-01160-6&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon |