Comparative effects of selenium-enriched lactobacilli and selenium-enriched yeast on performance, egg selenium enrichment, antioxidant capacity, and ileal microbiota in laying hens

Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while sel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of animal science and biotechnology Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 27
Main Authors Zhou, Jianmin, Obianwuna, Uchechukwu Edna, Zhang, Longfei, Liu, Yongli, Zhang, Haijun, Qiu, Kai, Wang, Jing, Qi, Guanghai, Wu, Shugeng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central 19.02.2025
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
AbstractList Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.BACKGROUNDOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.RESULTSSeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.CONCLUSIONSeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
Abstract Background Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. Results SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. Conclusion SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
BACKGROUND: Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. RESULTS: SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. CONCLUSION: SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks. SeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria. SeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
BackgroundOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its high bioavailability, efficient tissue accumulation and minimal toxicity. Selenium-enriched yeast (SeY) is a well-established source, while selenium-enriched lactobacilli (SeL), a newer alternative, offers the added benefits of probiotics. This study examined the effects of SeY and SeL on egg quality, antioxidant capacity, Se deposition, and gut health in laying hens. After a two-week pre-treatment with a Se-deficient diet (SeD), 450 Hy-Line Brown laying hens (30-week-old) were assigned into five dietary groups with six replicates of 15 hens each. The groups included a SeD, SeD supplemented with 1.5 mg Se/kg from SeY (SeY15), or 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg Se/kg from SeL (SeL15, SeL30, SeL60). The feeding trial lasted for 12 weeks.ResultsSeY15 and SeL15 improved the feed-to-egg ratio (P < 0.05) in the latter stages. Haugh units were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the SeY15 and SeL30 groups, while darker yolk color (P < 0.05) was observed in the SeY15, SeL15, and SeL60 groups. All Se-supplemented diets increased Se content in whole eggs, albumen, and yolk (P < 0.05), while SeL groups showed a dose-dependent effect. Antioxidant enzyme activities increased, and MDA content decreased in the serum (P < 0.05), with SeY15 showing the highest GSH-Px levels (P < 0.05). SeL60 increased serum alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase, and distorted the liver architecture (P < 0.05). Se-diets reduced concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ileum and liver (P < 0.05). SeL15 improved the ileal villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (P < 0.05). SeY15 and/or SeL15 up-regulated TXNRD1 and SEPHS1 mRNA while down-regulating SCLY expression in the liver. SeY15 altered ileal microbiota by increasing both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria, whereas SeL15 predominantly boosted beneficial bacteria.ConclusionSeL integrates the antioxidant properties of organic Se with the probiotic benefits on gut health, resulting in a performance-enhancing effect comparable to that of SeY. However, high SeL level (6.0 mg Se/kg) compromised productivity and metabolic functions while enhancing Se deposition.
ArticleNumber 27
Author Zhang, Longfei
Qi, Guanghai
Qiu, Kai
Wu, Shugeng
Zhang, Haijun
Zhou, Jianmin
Obianwuna, Uchechukwu Edna
Liu, Yongli
Wang, Jing
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jianmin
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Jianmin
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Uchechukwu Edna
  surname: Obianwuna
  fullname: Obianwuna, Uchechukwu Edna
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Longfei
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Longfei
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yongli
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Yongli
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Haijun
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Haijun
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kai
  surname: Qiu
  fullname: Qiu, Kai
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jing
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Jing
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Guanghai
  surname: Qi
  fullname: Qi, Guanghai
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Shugeng
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Shugeng
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFks1uEzEQgFeoiJbSF-CALHHhkAX_7Hq9J4QifipV4gJna9YeJ4527WBvKvJePCBuUqIWIeHLWPanzzPjeV6dhRiwql4y-pYxJd_lhjLa1JS3NWVM0lo-qS44bfqaqZ6dPdifV1c5b2hZkndCsWfVueh7KXvaXVS_lnHaQoLZ3yJB59DMmURHMo4Y_G6qMSRv1mjJCGaOAxg_jp5AsP9A9gh5JjGQLSYX0wTB4ILganViyZGdMMyLIpl9_OlticTAtqjn_eKg9iPCSCZvUhx8nIH4UN7f-7Aiawz5RfXUwZjx6j5eVt8_ffy2_FLffP18vfxwU5tW8bluAAfe9Uy6rhTWgBpY1wiHLaieD7YzyvXWSWjADQ0Iq7B0U6qeUuiUQCsuq-uj10bY6G3yE6S9juD14SCmlYY0ezOiBtNCI5SkjR0a1g7KOIDODkUn2g5ccb0_ura7YUJrSgcSjI-kj2-CX-tVvNXlt0UnqSiGN_eGFH_sMM968tngOELAuMtacEpFK6Xi_0eZVKLnsm0L-vovdBN3KZS2HijW8lbdUa8eZn9K-88gFYAfgfJlOSd0J4TRuxKkPg6sLi3Wh4HVUvwGh_Dh9Q
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.057
10.1093/ps/84.2.232
10.3390/ani11020281
10.1016/j.psj.2023.103224
10.1079/wps20020026
10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.073
10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.123
10.1093/ps/84.12.1900
10.1006/meth.2001.1262
10.1007/s12011-017-1169-x
10.1155/2019/9613090
10.2903/j.efsa.2009.992
10.1080/10495398.2023.2258188
10.1007/s12011-022-03120-x
10.1016/j.psj.2023.102983
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.040
10.1021/jf202014k
10.5713/ab.22.0067
10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x
10.3390/ani12081006
10.1080/1828051x.2023.2301446
10.3389/fphys.2024.1380713
10.2298/AVB0403191T
10.1186/s40104-021-00587-x
10.1111/1462-2920.13658
10.2527/jas.2012-5825
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.024
10.5713/ajas.14.0593
10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041
10.3390/molecules27092995
10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z
10.1007/s11259-021-09867-3
10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.05.005
10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.009
10.1128/mcb.00293-12
10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120156
10.1128/aem.04050-14
10.3382/ps.0610478
10.1016/j.psj.2022.102433
10.3390/antibiotics11091265
10.1093/ps/86.4.727
10.21037/cdt-20-883
10.5713/ajas.2009.80202
10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.057
10.1038/s41467-022-28385-7
10.1021/es101843x
10.2147/ijn.S374024
10.1016/j.psj.2023.103347
10.3390/ani11061681
10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117301
10.1074/jbc.M105395200
10.1016/j.psj.2021.101478
10.3390/ijms222111646
10.3389/fimmu.2022.928865
10.1016/j.animal.2021.100374
10.1080/00071660802236021
10.3389/fmicb.2021.635333
10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134435
10.1021/bi00210a001
10.3382/ps.2009-00250
10.3382/ps/pey597
10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127140
10.3382/ps/pex216
10.1007/s12011-022-03117-6
10.1016/j.aninu.2022.04.001
10.3382/ps.2014-04301
10.3390/antiox9101028
10.3389/fmed.2021.716816
10.1093/clinchem/43.7.1209
10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.020
10.1038/cddis.2014.574
10.1073/pnas.1611576114
10.3390/foods10040871
10.1016/j.psj.2021.101570
10.4141/CJAS07102
10.1093/jn/132.11.3411
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
Copyright BioMed Central Dec 2025
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: Copyright BioMed Central Dec 2025
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7X2
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ARAPS
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
L6V
LK8
M0K
M7P
M7S
P5Z
P62
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s40104-025-01160-6
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Engineering Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering collection
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

AGRICOLA
PubMed
Agricultural Science Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Agriculture
EISSN 2049-1891
EndPage 27
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af
PMC11837603
39966907
10_1186_s40104_025_01160_6
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID -04
-0D
-SD
-S~
0R~
5VR
5VS
7X2
8FE
8FG
8FH
92G
92I
92M
9D9
9DD
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
ARAPS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
C6C
CAJED
CCEZO
CCPQU
CHBEP
CHDYS
CITATION
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECGQY
EMK
EPL
ESX
EYRJQ
FA0
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IGS
IHR
ISR
ITC
JUIAU
KQ8
L6V
LK8
M0K
M7P
M7S
OK1
P62
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PROAC
PTHSS
Q--
Q-3
R-D
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
RT4
SBL
SOJ
T8T
TCJ
TGD
TUS
U1F
U1G
U5D
U5N
~MN
NPM
PQGLB
3V.
8FK
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
PKEHL
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-4aeb27916f7ffe4a8b1743fe5a892bd7c8f9df6a4afb4a3d8e02568900a783ed3
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 2049-1891
1674-9782
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:29 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:28:38 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:31:07 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:51:50 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 24 10:11:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:57:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:30:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Gut microbiota
Egg selenium
Laying hen
Antioxidant capacity
Feed efficiency
Selenium-enriched lactobacilli
Selenium-enriched yeast
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c582t-4aeb27916f7ffe4a8b1743fe5a892bd7c8f9df6a4afb4a3d8e02568900a783ed3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168152585?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 39966907
PQID 3168152585
PQPubID 2040221
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11837603
proquest_miscellaneous_3200356682
proquest_miscellaneous_3168392655
proquest_journals_3168152585
pubmed_primary_39966907
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40104_025_01160_6
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-02-19
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-02-19
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-02-19
  day: 19
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of animal science and biotechnology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Anim Sci Biotechnol
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References I Yoon (1160_CR47) 2007; 86
XJ Wei (1160_CR78) 2023; 299
Y Li (1160_CR3) 2024; 103
CL Pan (1160_CR25) 2011; 59
L Zhang (1160_CR19) 2023; 402
CA Zuberbuehler (1160_CR9) 2002; 132
M Mohiti-Asli (1160_CR42) 2008; 88
RS Glass (1160_CR67) 1993; 32
National Research Council (NRC) (1160_CR48) 2005
M Todorović (1160_CR50) 2004; 54
W Liu (1160_CR71) 2024; 103
HC Wang (1160_CR65) 2022; 201
M Baylan (1160_CR38) 2011; 143
LC Tan (1160_CR6) 2016; 34
1160_CR17
National Medical Products Administration of the People's Republic of China (1160_CR32) 2017
FG Martínez (1160_CR2) 2019; 123
H Liu (1160_CR8) 2017; 184
M Jlali (1160_CR21) 2013; 91
R Kang (1160_CR72) 2022; 13
WH Wang (1160_CR41) 2022; 12
PL Utterback (1160_CR44) 2005; 84
RL Payne (1160_CR43) 2005; 84
GX Sun (1160_CR7) 2010; 44
AI Muhammad (1160_CR26) 2021; 46
1160_CR60
U Gophna (1160_CR81) 2017; 19
F Register (1160_CR16) 2002; 67
JM Zhou (1160_CR37) 2023
JM Zhou (1160_CR82) 2021; 12
L Zhang (1160_CR4) 2021; 285
S Khan (1160_CR77) 2020; 11
Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (1160_CR31) 2004
MK Zhu (1160_CR59) 2020; 99
M-O Lee (1160_CR68) 2019; 520
E Delezie (1160_CR15) 2014; 93
M Skřivan (1160_CR23) 2008; 49
S Li (1160_CR33) 2021; 12
BS Lopes (1160_CR79) 2022; 27
Q Zhang (1160_CR76) 2021; 11
F Mohammadsadeghi (1160_CR24) 2023; 102
J Feng (1160_CR84) 2023; 102
PF Surai (1160_CR45) 2015; 28
YF Gu (1160_CR58) 2021; 100
A Okado-Matsumoto (1160_CR55) 2001; 276
Z Liu (1160_CR73) 2022; 10
AH Cantor (1160_CR49) 1982; 61
J Reunanen (1160_CR80) 2015; 81
Y Sun (1160_CR83) 2022; 11
LA Seale (1160_CR66) 2012; 32
SR Tan (1160_CR63) 2022; 201
J Lu (1160_CR10) 2019; 98
MM Zhao (1160_CR13) 2021; 15
Z Wu (1160_CR28) 2021; 8
M Esfahani-Mashhour (1160_CR39) 2009; 22
AI Muhammad (1160_CR40) 2021; 10
M Navarro-Alarcon (1160_CR52) 2008; 400
GD Jones (1160_CR5) 2017; 114
AP Mörschbächer (1160_CR1) 2018; 255
Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (1160_CR18) 2008
AI Muhammad (1160_CR36) 2021; 11
ASA Mohamed (1160_CR61) 2024; 23
S Kang (1160_CR27) 2020; 9
J Burger (1160_CR30) 2013; 443
D Kang (1160_CR62) 2022; 13
A Nandi (1160_CR56) 2019; 2019
EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) (1160_CR20) 2009; 992
J Jung (1160_CR69) 2021; 22
J Lu (1160_CR12) 2020; 99
F Nielsen (1160_CR57) 1997; 43
KJ Livak (1160_CR35) 2001; 25
J Liu (1160_CR14) 2023; 77
RL Li (1160_CR75) 2024; 35
J Xu (1160_CR64) 2015; 6
XJ Han (1160_CR54) 2017; 96
T Meng (1160_CR11) 2019; 189
A Chantiratikul (1160_CR22) 2023; 36
L Letavayová (1160_CR51) 2008; 638
PF Surai (1160_CR46) 2019; 58
L Qiao (1160_CR29) 2022; 17
P Janczyk (1160_CR74) 2009; 88
R Xiao (1160_CR34) 2021; 11
M Eşrefoǧlu (1160_CR53) 2009; 29
J Lv (1160_CR70) 2022; 101
References_xml – volume: 255
  start-page: 182
  year: 2018
  ident: 1160_CR1
  publication-title: Food Chem
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.057
– volume: 84
  start-page: 232
  year: 2005
  ident: 1160_CR43
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1093/ps/84.2.232
– volume: 11
  start-page: 281
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR76
  publication-title: Animals (Basel)
  doi: 10.3390/ani11020281
– volume: 103
  start-page: 103224
  year: 2024
  ident: 1160_CR71
  publication-title: Poult Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103224
– volume: 58
  start-page: 333
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR46
  publication-title: World’s Poult Sci J.
  doi: 10.1079/wps20020026
– volume: 99
  start-page: 3215
  year: 2020
  ident: 1160_CR59
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.073
– volume: 520
  start-page: 406
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR68
  publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.123
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1900
  year: 2005
  ident: 1160_CR44
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1093/ps/84.12.1900
– volume: 25
  start-page: 402
  year: 2001
  ident: 1160_CR35
  publication-title: Methods
  doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
– volume: 184
  start-page: 16
  year: 2017
  ident: 1160_CR8
  publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res
  doi: 10.1007/s12011-017-1169-x
– volume: 2019
  start-page: 9613090
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR56
  publication-title: Oxid Med Cell Longev
  doi: 10.1155/2019/9613090
– volume: 992
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1160_CR20
  publication-title: EFSA J.
  doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.992
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2258188
  year: 2024
  ident: 1160_CR75
  publication-title: Anim Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1080/10495398.2023.2258188
– volume: 201
  start-page: 368
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR63
  publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res
  doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03120-x
– volume: 102
  start-page: 102983
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR24
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102983
– volume: 443
  start-page: 278
  year: 2013
  ident: 1160_CR30
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.040
– volume: 59
  start-page: 11424
  year: 2011
  ident: 1160_CR25
  publication-title: J Agric Food Chem
  doi: 10.1021/jf202014k
– volume: 36
  start-page: 484
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR22
  publication-title: Anim Biosci
  doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0067
– volume: 143
  start-page: 957
  year: 2011
  ident: 1160_CR38
  publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res
  doi: 10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1006
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR41
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani12081006
– volume: 23
  start-page: 275
  year: 2024
  ident: 1160_CR61
  publication-title: Ital J Anim Sci
  doi: 10.1080/1828051x.2023.2301446
– ident: 1160_CR60
  doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1380713
– volume: 54
  start-page: 191
  year: 2004
  ident: 1160_CR50
  publication-title: Acta vet (Beogr)
  doi: 10.2298/AVB0403191T
– volume: 12
  start-page: 65
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR33
  publication-title: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00587-x
– volume: 19
  start-page: 835
  year: 2017
  ident: 1160_CR81
  publication-title: Environ Microbiol
  doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13658
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1745
  year: 2013
  ident: 1160_CR21
  publication-title: J Anim Sci
  doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5825
– volume: 67
  start-page: 46850
  year: 2002
  ident: 1160_CR16
  publication-title: Fed Regist
– ident: 1160_CR17
– volume: 400
  start-page: 115
  year: 2008
  ident: 1160_CR52
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.024
– volume: 28
  start-page: 730
  year: 2015
  ident: 1160_CR45
  publication-title: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci
  doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0593
– volume: 99
  start-page: 6267
  year: 2020
  ident: 1160_CR12
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2995
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR79
  publication-title: Molecules
  doi: 10.3390/molecules27092995
– volume: 189
  start-page: 548
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR11
  publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res
  doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z
– volume: 46
  start-page: 431
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR26
  publication-title: Vet Res Commun
  doi: 10.1007/s11259-021-09867-3
– volume: 11
  start-page: 29
  year: 2020
  ident: 1160_CR77
  publication-title: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-0433-7
– volume: 34
  start-page: 886
  year: 2016
  ident: 1160_CR6
  publication-title: Biotechnol Adv
  doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.05.005
– volume: 638
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 1160_CR51
  publication-title: Mutat Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2007.08.009
– volume: 32
  start-page: 4141
  year: 2012
  ident: 1160_CR66
  publication-title: Mol Cell Biol
  doi: 10.1128/mcb.00293-12
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1660
  year: 2009
  ident: 1160_CR53
  publication-title: Turkiye Klin J Med Sci
– volume: 299
  start-page: 120156
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR78
  publication-title: Carbohydr Polym
  doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120156
– volume: 81
  start-page: 3655
  year: 2015
  ident: 1160_CR80
  publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/aem.04050-14
– volume: 61
  start-page: 478
  year: 1982
  ident: 1160_CR49
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.3382/ps.0610478
– volume: 102
  start-page: 102433
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR84
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102433
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1265
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR83
  publication-title: Antibiotics
  doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091265
– volume: 86
  start-page: 727
  year: 2007
  ident: 1160_CR47
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.727
– volume: 11
  start-page: 744
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR34
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther.
  doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-883
– volume: 22
  start-page: 254
  year: 2009
  ident: 1160_CR39
  publication-title: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci
  doi: 10.5713/ajas.2009.80202
– volume: 123
  start-page: 115
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR2
  publication-title: Food Res Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.057
– volume: 13
  start-page: 779
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR62
  publication-title: Nat Commun
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28385-7
– volume: 44
  start-page: 6706
  year: 2010
  ident: 1160_CR7
  publication-title: Environ Sci Technol.
  doi: 10.1021/es101843x
– volume: 17
  start-page: 4807
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR29
  publication-title: Int J Nanomedicine
  doi: 10.2147/ijn.S374024
– volume: 103
  start-page: 103347
  year: 2024
  ident: 1160_CR3
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103347
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1681
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR36
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani11061681
– volume: 285
  start-page: 117301
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR4
  publication-title: Environ Pollut
  doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117301
– volume: 276
  start-page: 38388
  year: 2001
  ident: 1160_CR55
  publication-title: J Biol Chem
  doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105395200
– volume-title: Mineral tolerances of animals: second
  year: 2005
  ident: 1160_CR48
– volume: 100
  start-page: 101478
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR58
  publication-title: Poult Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101478
– volume: 22
  start-page: 11646
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR69
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms222111646
– volume: 13
  start-page: 928865
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR72
  publication-title: Front Immunol
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.928865
– volume: 15
  start-page: 100374
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR13
  publication-title: Animal
  doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100374
– volume: 49
  start-page: 482
  year: 2008
  ident: 1160_CR23
  publication-title: Br Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1080/00071660802236021
– volume: 12
  start-page: 635333
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR82
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635333
– volume-title: Approved feed additives
  year: 2008
  ident: 1160_CR18
– volume: 402
  start-page: 134435
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR19
  publication-title: Food Chem
  doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134435
– volume: 32
  start-page: 12555
  year: 1993
  ident: 1160_CR67
  publication-title: Biochemistry
  doi: 10.1021/bi00210a001
– volume: 88
  start-page: 2324
  year: 2009
  ident: 1160_CR74
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00250
– volume: 98
  start-page: 2522
  year: 2019
  ident: 1160_CR10
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.3382/ps/pey597
– volume: 77
  start-page: 127140
  year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR14
  publication-title: J Trace Elem Med Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127140
– volume: 96
  start-page: 3973
  year: 2017
  ident: 1160_CR54
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.3382/ps/pex216
– volume: 201
  start-page: 139
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR65
  publication-title: Biol Trace Elem Res
  doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03117-6
– volume: 10
  start-page: 124
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR73
  publication-title: Anim Nutr
  doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.04.001
– volume: 93
  start-page: 3083
  year: 2014
  ident: 1160_CR15
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04301
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1028
  year: 2020
  ident: 1160_CR27
  publication-title: Antioxidants
  doi: 10.3390/antiox9101028
– volume: 8
  start-page: 716816
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR28
  publication-title: Front Med (Lausanne)
  doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.716816
– volume-title: GB 5009.93–2017 National food safety standard-Determination of selenium in foods
  year: 2017
  ident: 1160_CR32
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1209
  year: 1997
  ident: 1160_CR57
  publication-title: Clin Chem
  doi: 10.1093/clinchem/43.7.1209
– year: 2023
  ident: 1160_CR37
  publication-title: J Integr Agric
  doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.09.020
– volume: 6
  start-page: e1616
  year: 2015
  ident: 1160_CR64
  publication-title: Cell Death Dis
  doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.574
– volume: 114
  start-page: 2848
  year: 2017
  ident: 1160_CR5
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611576114
– volume: 10
  start-page: 871
  year: 2021
  ident: 1160_CR40
  publication-title: Foods
  doi: 10.3390/foods10040871
– volume: 101
  start-page: 101570
  year: 2022
  ident: 1160_CR70
  publication-title: Poult Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101570
– volume: 88
  start-page: 475
  year: 2008
  ident: 1160_CR42
  publication-title: Can J Anim Sci
  doi: 10.4141/CJAS07102
– volume: 132
  start-page: 3411
  year: 2002
  ident: 1160_CR9
  publication-title: J Nutr
  doi: 10.1093/jn/132.11.3411
– volume-title: NY/T—2004 Feeding standard of chicken
  year: 2004
  ident: 1160_CR31
SSID ssj0000627381
Score 2.3473947
Snippet Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing to its...
BackgroundOrganic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues, owing...
BACKGROUND: Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and tissues,...
Abstract Background Organic selenium (Se) has gained recognition in poultry nutrition as a feed additive to boost production and Se deposition in eggs and...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 27
SubjectTerms Albumen
Alkaline phosphatase
animals
antioxidant activity
Antioxidant capacity
antioxidant enzymes
Antioxidants
Aspartate transaminase
Bacteria
Bioaccumulation
Bioavailability
Birds
blood serum
Climate change
color
Deposition
Diet
dose response
egg quality
Egg selenium
Eggs
Enrichment
Enzymatic activity
Enzymes
Feed additives
Feed efficiency
Feeds
Food
Food additives
Gene expression
Gut microbiota
Ileum
Lactobacilli
Lactobacillus
Laying hen
Liver
Metabolism
Microbiota
Microorganisms
mRNA
Nutrient deficiency
Nutrition
Nutrition research
Oxidative stress
Poultry
Poultry nutrition
Probiotics
Reactive oxygen species
Selenium
Selenium-enriched lactobacilli
Sodium
Soybeans
Toxicity
Transaminase
villi
Villus
Yeast
yeasts
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp_RQmj7dpEWF3roiXluS5WMaEkKhPTWQm9BzY2i0IdmF5n_lB3ZG8m52S2gvPS1eD7KlGWnmk0ffEPKp57X1omuYD7xjHHwMM84Ixqcu9r2dWpX3Ib99l2fn_OuFuNgo9YU5YYUeuAzcoXHC8FbJmnsLzsYqF43pvJXgaEVnIq6-4PM2wFRZg_HIyXR1SkbJw1uOyINh9Vb89gCYacsTZcL-x6LMP5MlN7zP6XPybAwb6VF53T3yJKQX5OnR7GakzghwtUEt-JLcHz_QetMxaYPOI8XiSmlYXjGwG8wC9fQnVtyxxuHGCzXJPyJyhwV-6DzR64djBhMaZrO1LC2yuNU4gUZA278GD7_UgTN2EOlPctOwBEEvrobC_rQwdEjwfDxpRS8BT78i56cnP47P2FihgTmhmgXjBoB5BxFm7KAj3CiLACcGYVTfWN85FXsfpeEmWm5arwKGWKqva9OpNvj2NdlJ8xTeEgpBvlcq1pbHyKPobYZWjWwjLDpctBX5vNKWvi5EHDoDGCV10a2GtnXWrZYV-YIKXUsiiXb-A0xLj6al_2VaFTlYmYMeZ_atxkJfWDNKiYp8XN-GOYkfWkwK82WRgbhTir_JZCpaKVVTkTfFwtZv2yII7euuImrL9ra6s30nDZeZGxzGA9Oc2nf_YwD2yW6TJ0zDpv0B2VncLMN7iMEW9kOebr8BIF00KQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Comparative effects of selenium-enriched lactobacilli and selenium-enriched yeast on performance, egg selenium enrichment, antioxidant capacity, and ileal microbiota in laying hens
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39966907
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168152585
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168392655
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3200356682
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11837603
https://doaj.org/article/ac5a438604db415b8cfaa7db689357af
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swED_W5GV7GPuety5osLdF1LElW34aSdesDFbGWKFvRrKs1NDaWT6g_b_2B-5OdpJmlD6FxIci-T50dzr9DuBTJkJjZRpxW4qUC9xjuC605GJUuCwzI6N8HvLHWXJ6Lr5fyIsu4bbsyio3NtEbatsUlCM_ogZL1KtHyS_zP5y6RtHpatdC4wD6aIKV6kF_cnL289c2y0IgvLHvVErV9hxDpmhzc0YlR0tB0Qinjq50HoFx1N7u5EH87_M8_y-gvLMjTZ_B086VZOOW98_hUVm_gCfj2aKD0yjx2x24wZfw93gH9c26Qg7WOEYNl-pqfc1Rlqgy1LIr6sJjdEHJGKZrew_JLTX9YU3N5rurB0NWzmZbWtbSUvpxiIOgBNxUFj9ZgRt0gd7_0A-NZglXcV21iFArzaoa_59uX7FLjLFfwfn05PfxKe-6NvBCqmjFhcZgPUWv06W4EKGVoaDHlVKrLDI2LZTLrEu00M4IHVtVktulsjDUqYpLG7-GXt3U5Vtg6PhbpVxohHPCycz4cCtKYoeGSMg4gM8bbuXzFpwj90GNSvKWtzmOnXve5kkAE2LolpKAtf0PzWKWd3qa60JqEaskFNagb2NU4bROrcEJxjLVLoDDjTjknbYv851sBvBx-xj1lA5fdF0265YGfdFEPkTj4WmTREUBvGklbDvbmALTLEwDUHuyt7ec_Sd1denxwvF9UOlT_O7hub-Hx5FXhYiPskPorRbr8gN6XCszgAM1_TaA_njydTIddEo28PmLf_AsMXA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOQAHxLMEChgJTtRqNrYT54BQKSxb-ji1Um_Bju3tSjRZ9iHon-LED2TGSXa7qOqtp1U2I8fJjMfz2eP5CHmbi9hYmSXMOpExAXMM06WWTPRKn-emZ1RYhzw8Sgcn4tupPF0jf7qzMJhW2fnE4KhtXeIa-TYSLCFXj5Ifxz8Zskbh7mpHodGYxb67-AWQbfph7zPo912S9L8c7w5YyyrASqmSGRMawGQGUZHPvHdCK4NBuXdSqzwxNiuVz61PtdDeCM2tchgWqDyOdaa4sxzavUVuCw4zOZ5M739drOlgyV8eeFExt58BQEu6czoq3Z4KxD4M-WNx9wNQ28pcGCgDropz_0_XvDT_9R-Q-23gSncaS3tI1lz1iNzbGU7a4h0Ori4VN3xM_u4uC4vTNm2E1p4ivVM1mp8zsFzMQ7X0B3L-GF3i0g_Vlb1C5AIphmhd0fHyoMMWdcPhQpY2srjYuQWNgL39Hln4pSWEAyVgja3QNDhBeIvzUVN_aqbpqILn41kvegaI_gk5uRFtPiXrVV25Z4QCzLBK-dgI74WXuQngLkm5B7cnJI_I-05bxbgpBVIECKXSotFtAW0XQbdFGpFPqNCFJJbxDn_Uk2HReoVCl1ILrtJYWAORlFGl1zqzBjrIZaZ9RDY7cyha3zItliMhIm8Wt8Er4FaPrlw9b2Qg8k3ldTKhGG6aqiQiG42FLXrLEQbncRYRtWJ7K6-zeqcanYXq5PA9MNGKP7--76_JncHx4UFxsHe0_4LcTcKwSFgv3yTrs8ncvYRYb2ZehQFGyfebHtH_AFQZax8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELdGJyF4QHwTGGAkeKJW08RJnAeE9lVtDKoJMWlvxo7trhJLSj8E-7944q_jzknaFU1721OV5uQ4ufP5fvb5foS8zXmoTZJFzFieMQ5zDFOFShjvFy7PdV8Lvw75ZZgenPBPp8npBvnbnoXBtMrWJ3pHbaoC18h7SLCEXD0i6bkmLeJ4b_Bx8pMhgxTutLZ0GrWJHNmLXwDfZh8O90DX76JosP9t94A1DAOsSEQ0Z1wBsMwgQnKZc5YroTFAdzZRIo-0yQrhcuNSxZXTXMVGWAwRRB6GKhOxNTG0e4tsZoiKOmRzZ394_HW5woMFgGPPkoqZ_gzgWtSe2hFpb8YRCTFkk8W9EMBwazOjJxC4Kur9P3nz0mw4uE_uNWEs3a7t7gHZsOVDcnd7NG1KeVi4ulTq8BH5s7sqM06bJBJaOYpkT-V4cc7AjjEr1dAfyACkVYELQVSV5gqRCyQcolVJJ6tjD11qR6OlLK1lcemzC42A9f0eG_ilBQQHBSCPrm8aXCK8xfm4rkY1V3RcwvPx5Bc9A3z_mJzciD6fkE5ZlfYZoQA6jBAu1Nw57pJce6gXpbEDJ8iTOCDvW23JSV0YRHpAJVJZ61ZC29LrVqYB2UGFLiWxqLf_o5qOZOMjpCoSxWORhtxoiKu0KJxSmdHQwTjJlAvIVmsOsvE0M7kaFwF5s7wNPgI3flRpq0UtA3Fwmlwn40vjpqmIAvK0trBlb2MExXmYBUSs2d7a66zfKcdnvlY5fA9Mu4qfX9_31-Q2jGb5-XB49ILcifyoiFg_3yKd-XRhX0LgN9evmhFGyfebHtT_AAsncLE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+effects+of+selenium-enriched+lactobacilli+and+selenium-enriched+yeast+on+performance%2C+egg+selenium+enrichment%2C+antioxidant+capacity%2C+and+ileal+microbiota+in+laying+hens&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science+and+biotechnology&rft.au=Zhou%2C+Jianmin&rft.au=Obianwuna%2C+Uchechukwu+Edna&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Longfei&rft.au=Liu%2C+Yongli&rft.date=2025-02-19&rft.issn=2049-1891&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1+p.27-27&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=27&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40104-025-01160-6&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-1891&client=summon