Constraints on signaling network logic reveal functional subgraphs on Multiple Myeloma OMIC data

Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC systems biology Vol. 12; no. Suppl 3; p. 32
Main Authors Miannay, Bertrand, Minvielle, Stéphane, Magrangeas, Florence, Guziolowski, Carito
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 21.03.2018
BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1752-0509
1752-0509
DOI10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
AbstractList Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. Keywords: Answer set programming, Regulatory network modeling, Omic data integration
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.BACKGROUNDThe integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.RESULTSWe start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.CONCLUSIONWe discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
Background: The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results: We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion: We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.
ArticleNumber 32
Audience Academic
Author Miannay, Bertrand
Guziolowski, Carito
Magrangeas, Florence
Minvielle, Stéphane
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bertrand
  surname: Miannay
  fullname: Miannay, Bertrand
  organization: LS2N, UMR 6004, École Centrale de Nantes, CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Stéphane
  surname: Minvielle
  fullname: Minvielle, Stéphane
  organization: CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Florence
  surname: Magrangeas
  fullname: Magrangeas, Florence
  organization: CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Carito
  surname: Guziolowski
  fullname: Guziolowski, Carito
  email: carito.guziolowski@ls2n.fr
  organization: LS2N, UMR 6004, École Centrale de Nantes
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01804825$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp9kl1v0zAUhiM0xD7gB3CDInEDEh3-iBPnBqmqgFVqNYmPa-Mmx6mHY3e2U9i_xyFjWic0WZGd-HnfEx-_p9mRdRay7CVG5xjz8n3ApMZ8hsaHMTwrnmQnuGIkvaH66N76ODsN4QohRgmpnmXHpGa8ZmV5kv1YOBuil9rGkDubB91ZabTtcgvxl_M_c-M63eQe9iBNrgbbRO0Skodh03m52_6VrQcT9c5Avr4B43qZX66Xi7yVUT7PnippAry4nc-y758-fltczFaXn5eL-WrWMI7irAYEpGVtIVHLa8XZBogijQRCiEKKlqBaSnkBqmaSVm1V8JaqsiJ0s-G0BXqWfZh8d8Omh7YBm05lxM7rXvob4aQWhztWb0Xn9oLxZMJZMng3GWwfyC7mK6FtAN-L1GlUcML2OOFvbut5dz1AiKLXoQFjpAU3BEEQrouKcsIT-npCO2kgWSmXfqAZcTFnZXKkqB7rn_-HSqOFXjfp4pVO3w8Ebw8EiYnwO3ZyCEEsv345ZF_d787d-f4FIQF4AhrvQvCg7hCMxBg2MYVtbIEYwyaKpKkeaBod5RiPMVDmUSWZlCFVsR14ceUGn1IVHhH9AZuM588
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_018_2058_9
crossref_primary_10_1093_database_baaa113
Cites_doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu089
10.1016/S0960-7404(97)00015-7
10.1182/blood-2010-01-264796
10.1038/498255a
10.3389/fbioe.2015.00200
10.1093/hmg/10.7.699
10.1038/nrg3552
10.1093/bioinformatics/btt373
10.1016/j.lfs.2013.10.027
10.1038/s41598-017-09378-9
10.1093/nar/gkr1227
10.1038/75556
10.2200/S00457ED1V01Y201211AIM019
10.1083/jcb.200404158
10.1002/ajh.24402
10.1186/s12859-015-0733-7
10.1093/nar/28.1.27
10.1186/s12859-017-1559-2
10.1038/nmeth.1938
10.1093/bioinformatics/btv305
10.1093/bioinformatics/btt471
10.1093/nar/gkn653
10.1186/1471-2105-12-436
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2018
COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2018
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
ISR
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
DOI 10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList



MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1752-0509
EndPage 32
ExternalDocumentID PMC5872385
oai_HAL_inserm_01804825v1
A568043095
29589566
10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: P01 CA155258
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GX1
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M1P
M48
M7P
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SJN
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
~8M
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
-56
-5G
-A0
-BR
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
BCGST
C24
GROUPED_DOAJ
M~E
NPM
PMFND
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-9e0e2d5d4a0d89f85be2f2cae222f0f36efd3384ef95a37d748d3f6723bb83de3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1752-0509
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:11:21 EDT 2025
Fri May 09 12:25:21 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 17:25:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:06:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:32:17 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:16:28 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:18 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:29:35 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:24:51 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Suppl 3
Keywords Regulatory network modeling
Answer set programming
Omic data integration
Language English
License Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c580t-9e0e2d5d4a0d89f85be2f2cae222f0f36efd3384ef95a37d748d3f6723bb83de3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5872385
ORCID 0000-0003-1389-312X
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4
PMID 29589566
PQID 2019473828
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5872385
hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_01804825v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2019473828
gale_infotracmisc_A568043095
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A568043095
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A568043095
pubmed_primary_29589566
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4
springer_journals_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20180321
2018-3-21
2018-03-21
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-03-21
PublicationDate_xml – month: 3
  year: 2018
  text: 20180321
  day: 21
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC systems biology
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Syst Biol
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Syst Biol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
References S Thiele (551_CR18) 2015; 16
W Liu (551_CR3) 2013; 29
K Mitra (551_CR6) 2013; 14
S Boué (551_CR9) 2015; 2015
M Kanehisa (551_CR8) 2000; 28
A Fabregat (551_CR10) 2017; 18
M Haidari (551_CR11) 2013; 93
RJ Bold (551_CR29) 1997; 6
SV Rajkumar (551_CR19) 2016; 91
JH Morris (551_CR30) 2011; 12
FE Faisal (551_CR14) 2014; 30
M Gebser (551_CR21) 2012; 6
H Mi (551_CR28) 2013; 41
551_CR23
V Marx (551_CR1) 2013; 498
V Lifschitz (551_CR20) 2008
CF Schaefer (551_CR22) 2009; 37
S Dudoit (551_CR7) 2002; 12
The Gene Ontology Consortium (551_CR27) 2000; 25
R Core Team (551_CR24) 2015
C Backes (551_CR15) 2012; 40
B Miannay (551_CR25) 2017; 7
M Bentele (551_CR2) 2004; 166
T Nepusz (551_CR12) 2012; 9
B Klein (551_CR26) 2010; 115
EO Paull (551_CR16) 2013; 29
JR Nevins (551_CR4) 2001; 10
A Razi (551_CR13) 2016; 7
R Nicolle (551_CR17) 2015; 31
O Ates (551_CR5) 2015; 3
References_xml – volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 551_CR13
  publication-title: Biomed Eng Comput Biol
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1721
  issue: 12
  year: 2014
  ident: 551_CR14
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu089
– volume-title: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 551_CR20
– ident: 551_CR23
– volume: 6
  start-page: 133
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  ident: 551_CR29
  publication-title: Surgical Oncology
  doi: 10.1016/S0960-7404(97)00015-7
– volume: 12
  start-page: 111
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 551_CR7
  publication-title: Statistica Sinica
– volume: 115
  start-page: 3422
  issue: 17
  year: 2010
  ident: 551_CR26
  publication-title: Blood
  doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264796
– volume: 498
  start-page: 255
  issue: 7453
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR1
  publication-title: Nature
  doi: 10.1038/498255a
– volume: 3
  start-page: 200
  year: 2015
  ident: 551_CR5
  publication-title: Front Bioeng Biotechnol
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00200
– volume: 41
  start-page: 377
  issue: Database issue
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR28
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
– volume: 10
  start-page: 699
  issue: 7
  year: 2001
  ident: 551_CR4
  publication-title: Human molecular genetics
  doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.699
– volume: 14
  start-page: 719
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR6
  publication-title: Nat Rev Genet
  doi: 10.1038/nrg3552
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2169
  issue: 17
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR3
  publication-title: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt373
– volume: 93
  start-page: 994
  issue: 25-26
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR11
  publication-title: Life Sciences
  doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.10.027
– volume: 7
  start-page: 9257
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 551_CR25
  publication-title: Scientific Reports
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09378-9
– volume: 40
  start-page: 43
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 551_CR15
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Research
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1227
– volume: 25
  start-page: 25
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 551_CR27
  publication-title: Nature Genetics
  doi: 10.1038/75556
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 551_CR21
  publication-title: Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  doi: 10.2200/S00457ED1V01Y201211AIM019
– volume: 166
  start-page: 839
  issue: 6
  year: 2004
  ident: 551_CR2
  publication-title: J Cell Biol
  doi: 10.1083/jcb.200404158
– volume: 91
  start-page: 719
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  ident: 551_CR19
  publication-title: Am J Hematol
  doi: 10.1002/ajh.24402
– volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  year: 2015
  ident: 551_CR24
– volume: 16
  start-page: 345
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 551_CR18
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0733-7
– volume: 28
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 551_CR8
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27
– volume: 2015
  start-page: 030
  issue: 0
  year: 2015
  ident: 551_CR9
  publication-title: Database : the journal of biological databases and curation
– volume: 18
  start-page: 142
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 551_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1559-2
– volume: 9
  start-page: 471
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 551_CR12
  publication-title: Nature methods
  doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1938
– volume: 31
  start-page: 3066
  issue: 18
  year: 2015
  ident: 551_CR17
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv305
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2757
  issue: 21
  year: 2013
  ident: 551_CR16
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt471
– volume: 37
  start-page: 674
  issue: Database issue
  year: 2009
  ident: 551_CR22
  publication-title: Nucleic acids research
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn653
– volume: 12
  start-page: 436
  year: 2011
  ident: 551_CR30
  publication-title: BMC bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-436
SSID ssj0053227
Score 2.181257
Snippet Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being...
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely...
Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being...
Background: The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being...
SourceID pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 32
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Bioinformatics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cancer
Cellular and Medical Topics
Computational Biology/Bioinformatics
Gene expression
Genetic aspects
Life Sciences
Multiple myeloma
Physiological
Simulation and Modeling
Systems Biology
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9QwFA7uiuCLeLfrKlEUQSl20lwfh8VlFMcHdWHfYtokrrDbynZG2H_vOWlmsK4KwvSpJ2nanJzL5Mt3CHnWmJa5qNoyaldBgtLoEuK4uuRGNlxJ41Wq1rD8IBdH_N2xOM5k0XgW5tf9-5mWrwfwRzOEW8EFzr3kO-SqQJox3JeVBxujK0AvVd60_GOzidvJxnfnBLGPlwPLy_jI3zZJk-85vElu5KCRzsdZvkWuhO42uTaWkby4Q75g1c1U62E10L6jiMlweMycdiPImyYDR5GtCbpBVzb-A0iHdZMYq1OzZcYW0uVFOO3PHMUChxQhpHfJ0eGbzweLMldOKFuhq1VpQhWYF567ymsTtWgCi6x1AaKBWMVahughN-UhGuFq5RXXvo5SsbppdO1DfY_sdn0XHhAatTc-SMl80_KmUk6YyqsYPfwChB8FqTYf1raZVhzf-NSm9EJLO86FrfCCubC8IC-3Tb6PnBr_En6Ks2WRq6JDMMxXtx4G-_bTRzsXUiNlmREFeZGFYg8Pb10-WwCvgPRWE8n9iSQspnZy-zkoxXZUyL29mL8HabAHZzgqMHhM_JgV5MlGbSx2gUi1LvTrwUJAZbiqIZEtyP1RjbbdMSM05KOyIGqiYJPnTe90304S57fQWB0Oxvdqo4o2G5vh799u77-kH5LrLC2YumSzfbK7Ol-HRxBxrZrHaa39BKN8I_E
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Constraints on signaling network logic reveal functional subgraphs on Multiple Myeloma OMIC data
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589566
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2019473828
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01804825
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5872385
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfWTUi8IL7JGJVBICRQIHX8lQeESrWpIDqhQaW-mSS22aQuhaVF9L_nzkkrhQ2E1DxUuTiOfee7iy-_HyFPi6xkuVdl7HWeQIJS6BjiuDTmmSy4kplVga1hcizHU_5hJmY7ZENv1Q5gfWVqh3xS04v5q18_1m_B4N8Eg9fydQ0-a4AlWXBAABDzHtkDxyRRySd8u6kgQHcD14oSLEbYk3aT88omOm6qXax7p1greTkQvVxP-cemavBVRzfJjTbIpMNGK26RHVfdJtca2sn1HfIVWToDN8SypouKYg1Hjp-l06opCqdhQaSI7gTNoOtr3hjSelUEhOtw2aStRaSTtZsvznOKhIgUS07vkunR4ZfROG6ZFuJS6GQZZy5xzArL88TqzGtROOZZmTuIHnziU-m8hVyWO5-JPFVWcW1TLxVLi0Kn1qX3yG61qNwDQr22mXVSMluUvEhULrLEKu8t_ByEKxFJNgNryhaGHJ94bkI6oqVp5sIkeMBcGB6RF9tLvjcYHP8SfoKzZRDbosLimW_5qq7N-88nZiikRoizTETkeSvkF3DzMm-_RYBHQDisjuRBRxKMr-ycfgZKse0VYnWPhx9BGtaPc-wVLJBM_BxE5PFGbQw2gZVtlVusagMBWMZVColvRO43arRtjmVCQ_4qI6I6Cta5X_dMdXYaMMKFRjY56N_LjSqajW39fez2_2fsHpLrLNhJGrPBAdldXqzcIwjMlkWf9NRM9cneu8PjTyfwbyRH_WCCvwHaMzW2
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZoEYIL4k2ggEEgJKqIbOLncVVRbWG3B2il3kwc2xSpTRDZReq_Z8bxrggFJKTNKWPHicfzWH_-hpCXVjdlHWSTB1UXkKBYlUMcV-VMC8uk0E7Gag2LQzE7Zu9P-Ekii8azML_u30-UeNuDP5og3AoucO452yJXGSTKcV9W7K2NLge9lGnT8o_NRm4nGd-tU8Q-Xg4sL-Mjf9skjb5n_xa5mYJGOh1m-Ta54ts75NpQRvLiLvmMVTdjrYdlT7uWIiajxmPmtB1A3jQaOIpsTdANurLhH0Dar2xkrI7NFglbSBcX_qw7rykWOKQIIb1HjvffHe3N8lQ5IW-4Kpa59oUvHXesLpzSQXHry1A2tYdoIBShEj44yE2ZD5rXlXSSKVcFIcvKWlU5X90n223X-oeEBuW080KUzjbMFrLmunAyBAc_D-FHRor1hzVNohXHNz4zMb1QwgxzYQq8YC4My8ibTZNvA6fGv4Rf4GwZ5KpoEQzzpV71vTn49NFMuVBIWaZ5Rl4nodDBw5s6nS2AV0B6q5HkzkgSFlMzuv0KlGIzKuTenk3nIA324BxHBQav5D8mGXm-VhuDXSBSrfXdqjcQUGkmK0hkM_JgUKNNd6XmCvJRkRE5UrDR88Z32q-nkfObK6wOB-PbXauiScam__u3e_Rf0s_I9dnRYm7mB4cfHpMbZVw8VV5Odsj28vvKP4Hoa2mfxnX3E3-zJt4
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLbYEIgXxJ3AAINASKBoqRPfHqtC1cE6IWDS3jw7thnSlkykRdq_55xcKoUBElLzlGPHiY_Ppf78HUJeOl0yG2WZRmUzSFCcSiGOy9NCC1dIob1sqzUsD8TisPhwxI_6OqfNgHYftiS7Mw3I0lStds997Ja4ErsNeKkJgrDgApefFlvkKiQqEyTPn4nZYIo5aKvstzL_2GzkjHqTvHWCiMjL4eZl1ORvW6etR5rfIjf7UJJOu7m_Ta6E6g651hWXvLhLjrEWZ1sBYtXQuqKI1LB4-JxWHfSbtmaPIocTdIMOrvtfkDZr1_JYt82WPeKQLi_CaX1mKZY9pAgsvUcO5--_zhZpX08hLbnKVqkOWWCe-8JmXumouAssstIGiBFiFnMRooeMtQhRc5tLLwvl8ygky51TuQ_5fbJd1VV4SGhUXvsgBPOuLFwmLdeZlzF6-AUIShKSDR_WlD3ZOL7xqWmTDiVMNxcmwwvmwhQJebNpct4xbfxL-AXOlkEGiwohMt_sumnM3pfPZsqFQiIzzRPyuheKNTy8tP2JA3gFJL0aSe6MJGGJlaPbr0ApNqNCRu7FdB-kwUqc4ajADDL-c5KQ54PaGOwC8WtVqNeNgTBLFzKH9DYhDzo12nTHNFeQpYqEyJGCjZ43vlN9P2mZwLnCmnEwvreDKpreBDV__3aP_kv6Gbn-6d3c7O8dfHxMbrB27eQpm-yQ7dWPdXgCIdnKPW2X3S-MFS8l
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constraints+on+signaling+network+logic+reveal+functional+subgraphs+on+Multiple+Myeloma+OMIC+data&rft.jtitle=BMC+systems+biology&rft.au=Miannay%2C+Bertrand&rft.au=Minvielle%2C+St%C3%A9phane&rft.au=Magrangeas%2C+Florence&rft.au=Guziolowski%2C+Carito&rft.date=2018-03-21&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1752-0509&rft.eissn=1752-0509&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=Suppl+3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12918-018-0551-4&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A568043095
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon