Constraints on signaling network logic reveal functional subgraphs on Multiple Myeloma OMIC data
Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them inc...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC systems biology Vol. 12; no. Suppl 3; p. 32 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
21.03.2018
BioMed Central Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1752-0509 1752-0509 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.
Results
We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of
harmony
between the molecular species
active
or
inactive
possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP.
We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.
Conclusion
We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.
Results
We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of
harmony
between the molecular species
active
or
inactive
possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP.
We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.
Conclusion
We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. Keywords: Answer set programming, Regulatory network modeling, Omic data integration The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.BACKGROUNDThe integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level.We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.RESULTSWe start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer.We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles.CONCLUSIONWe discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. Background: The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely explored. Existing methods are based on network distance measures among significantly measured species. Only a small number of them include the directionality and underlying logic existing in biological networks. In this study we approach the GEP-networks integration problem by considering the network logic, however our approach does not require a prior species selection according to their gene expression level. Results: We start by modeling the biological network representing its underlying logic using Logic Programming. This model points to reachable network discrete states that maximize a notion of harmony between the molecular species active or inactive possible states and the directionality of the pathways reactions according to their activator or inhibitor control role. Only then, we confront these network states with the GEP. From this confrontation independent graph components are derived, each of them related to a fixed and optimal assignment of active or inactive states. These components allow us to decompose a large-scale network into subgraphs and their molecular species state assignments have different degrees of similarity when compared to the same GEP. We apply our method to study the set of possible states derived from a subgraph from the NCI-PID Pathway Interaction Database. This graph links Multiple Myeloma (MM) genes to known receptors for this blood cancer. Conclusion: We discover that the NCI-PID MM graph had 15 independent components, and when confronted to 611 MM GEPs, we find 1 component as being more specific to represent the difference between cancer and healthy profiles. |
ArticleNumber | 32 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Miannay, Bertrand Guziolowski, Carito Magrangeas, Florence Minvielle, Stéphane |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bertrand surname: Miannay fullname: Miannay, Bertrand organization: LS2N, UMR 6004, École Centrale de Nantes, CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes – sequence: 2 givenname: Stéphane surname: Minvielle fullname: Minvielle, Stéphane organization: CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes – sequence: 3 givenname: Florence surname: Magrangeas fullname: Magrangeas, Florence organization: CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Université de Nantes – sequence: 4 givenname: Carito surname: Guziolowski fullname: Guziolowski, Carito email: carito.guziolowski@ls2n.fr organization: LS2N, UMR 6004, École Centrale de Nantes |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01804825$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNp9kl1v0zAUhiM0xD7gB3CDInEDEh3-iBPnBqmqgFVqNYmPa-Mmx6mHY3e2U9i_xyFjWic0WZGd-HnfEx-_p9mRdRay7CVG5xjz8n3ApMZ8hsaHMTwrnmQnuGIkvaH66N76ODsN4QohRgmpnmXHpGa8ZmV5kv1YOBuil9rGkDubB91ZabTtcgvxl_M_c-M63eQe9iBNrgbbRO0Skodh03m52_6VrQcT9c5Avr4B43qZX66Xi7yVUT7PnippAry4nc-y758-fltczFaXn5eL-WrWMI7irAYEpGVtIVHLa8XZBogijQRCiEKKlqBaSnkBqmaSVm1V8JaqsiJ0s-G0BXqWfZh8d8Omh7YBm05lxM7rXvob4aQWhztWb0Xn9oLxZMJZMng3GWwfyC7mK6FtAN-L1GlUcML2OOFvbut5dz1AiKLXoQFjpAU3BEEQrouKcsIT-npCO2kgWSmXfqAZcTFnZXKkqB7rn_-HSqOFXjfp4pVO3w8Ebw8EiYnwO3ZyCEEsv345ZF_d787d-f4FIQF4AhrvQvCg7hCMxBg2MYVtbIEYwyaKpKkeaBod5RiPMVDmUSWZlCFVsR14ceUGn1IVHhH9AZuM588 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_018_2058_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_database_baaa113 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu089 10.1016/S0960-7404(97)00015-7 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264796 10.1038/498255a 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00200 10.1093/hmg/10.7.699 10.1038/nrg3552 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt373 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.10.027 10.1038/s41598-017-09378-9 10.1093/nar/gkr1227 10.1038/75556 10.2200/S00457ED1V01Y201211AIM019 10.1083/jcb.200404158 10.1002/ajh.24402 10.1186/s12859-015-0733-7 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 10.1186/s12859-017-1559-2 10.1038/nmeth.1938 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv305 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt471 10.1093/nar/gkn653 10.1186/1471-2105-12-436 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2018 COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2018 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM ISR 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef PubMed Gale In Context: Science MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1752-0509 |
EndPage | 32 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5872385 oai_HAL_inserm_01804825v1 A568043095 29589566 10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCI NIH HHS grantid: P01 CA155258 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBS EJD EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GX1 H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LK8 M1P M48 M7P O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SJN SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION -56 -5G -A0 -BR 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ BCGST C24 GROUPED_DOAJ M~E NPM PMFND 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-9e0e2d5d4a0d89f85be2f2cae222f0f36efd3384ef95a37d748d3f6723bb83de3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1752-0509 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:11:21 EDT 2025 Fri May 09 12:25:21 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 17:25:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:06:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:32:17 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:16:28 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:34:18 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:29:35 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:24:51 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Suppl 3 |
Keywords | Regulatory network modeling Answer set programming Omic data integration |
Language | English |
License | Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c580t-9e0e2d5d4a0d89f85be2f2cae222f0f36efd3384ef95a37d748d3f6723bb83de3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 PMCID: PMC5872385 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1389-312X |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4 |
PMID | 29589566 |
PQID | 2019473828 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5872385 hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_01804825v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2019473828 gale_infotracmisc_A568043095 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A568043095 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A568043095 pubmed_primary_29589566 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4 springer_journals_10_1186_s12918_018_0551_4 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20180321 2018-3-21 2018-03-21 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-03-21 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 3 year: 2018 text: 20180321 day: 21 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | BMC systems biology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Syst Biol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Syst Biol |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd |
References | S Thiele (551_CR18) 2015; 16 W Liu (551_CR3) 2013; 29 K Mitra (551_CR6) 2013; 14 S Boué (551_CR9) 2015; 2015 M Kanehisa (551_CR8) 2000; 28 A Fabregat (551_CR10) 2017; 18 M Haidari (551_CR11) 2013; 93 RJ Bold (551_CR29) 1997; 6 SV Rajkumar (551_CR19) 2016; 91 JH Morris (551_CR30) 2011; 12 FE Faisal (551_CR14) 2014; 30 M Gebser (551_CR21) 2012; 6 H Mi (551_CR28) 2013; 41 551_CR23 V Marx (551_CR1) 2013; 498 V Lifschitz (551_CR20) 2008 CF Schaefer (551_CR22) 2009; 37 S Dudoit (551_CR7) 2002; 12 The Gene Ontology Consortium (551_CR27) 2000; 25 R Core Team (551_CR24) 2015 C Backes (551_CR15) 2012; 40 B Miannay (551_CR25) 2017; 7 M Bentele (551_CR2) 2004; 166 T Nepusz (551_CR12) 2012; 9 B Klein (551_CR26) 2010; 115 EO Paull (551_CR16) 2013; 29 JR Nevins (551_CR4) 2001; 10 A Razi (551_CR13) 2016; 7 R Nicolle (551_CR17) 2015; 31 O Ates (551_CR5) 2015; 3 |
References_xml | – volume: 7 start-page: 1 issue: Suppl 2 year: 2016 ident: 551_CR13 publication-title: Biomed Eng Comput Biol – volume: 30 start-page: 1721 issue: 12 year: 2014 ident: 551_CR14 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu089 – volume-title: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 3 year: 2008 ident: 551_CR20 – ident: 551_CR23 – volume: 6 start-page: 133 issue: 3 year: 1997 ident: 551_CR29 publication-title: Surgical Oncology doi: 10.1016/S0960-7404(97)00015-7 – volume: 12 start-page: 111 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 551_CR7 publication-title: Statistica Sinica – volume: 115 start-page: 3422 issue: 17 year: 2010 ident: 551_CR26 publication-title: Blood doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-264796 – volume: 498 start-page: 255 issue: 7453 year: 2013 ident: 551_CR1 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/498255a – volume: 3 start-page: 200 year: 2015 ident: 551_CR5 publication-title: Front Bioeng Biotechnol doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00200 – volume: 41 start-page: 377 issue: Database issue year: 2013 ident: 551_CR28 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res – volume: 10 start-page: 699 issue: 7 year: 2001 ident: 551_CR4 publication-title: Human molecular genetics doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.699 – volume: 14 start-page: 719 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 551_CR6 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg3552 – volume: 29 start-page: 2169 issue: 17 year: 2013 ident: 551_CR3 publication-title: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt373 – volume: 93 start-page: 994 issue: 25-26 year: 2013 ident: 551_CR11 publication-title: Life Sciences doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.10.027 – volume: 7 start-page: 9257 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 551_CR25 publication-title: Scientific Reports doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09378-9 – volume: 40 start-page: 43 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 551_CR15 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Research doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1227 – volume: 25 start-page: 25 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 551_CR27 publication-title: Nature Genetics doi: 10.1038/75556 – volume: 6 start-page: 1 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 551_CR21 publication-title: Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning doi: 10.2200/S00457ED1V01Y201211AIM019 – volume: 166 start-page: 839 issue: 6 year: 2004 ident: 551_CR2 publication-title: J Cell Biol doi: 10.1083/jcb.200404158 – volume: 91 start-page: 719 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: 551_CR19 publication-title: Am J Hematol doi: 10.1002/ajh.24402 – volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing year: 2015 ident: 551_CR24 – volume: 16 start-page: 345 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 551_CR18 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0733-7 – volume: 28 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 551_CR8 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 – volume: 2015 start-page: 030 issue: 0 year: 2015 ident: 551_CR9 publication-title: Database : the journal of biological databases and curation – volume: 18 start-page: 142 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 551_CR10 publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1559-2 – volume: 9 start-page: 471 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 551_CR12 publication-title: Nature methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1938 – volume: 31 start-page: 3066 issue: 18 year: 2015 ident: 551_CR17 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv305 – volume: 29 start-page: 2757 issue: 21 year: 2013 ident: 551_CR16 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt471 – volume: 37 start-page: 674 issue: Database issue year: 2009 ident: 551_CR22 publication-title: Nucleic acids research doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn653 – volume: 12 start-page: 436 year: 2011 ident: 551_CR30 publication-title: BMC bioinformatics doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-436 |
SSID | ssj0053227 |
Score | 2.181257 |
Snippet | Background
The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being... The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being widely... Background The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being... Background: The integration of gene expression profiles (GEPs) and large-scale biological networks derived from pathways databases is a subject which is being... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 32 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms Bioinformatics Biomedical and Life Sciences Cancer Cellular and Medical Topics Computational Biology/Bioinformatics Gene expression Genetic aspects Life Sciences Multiple myeloma Physiological Simulation and Modeling Systems Biology |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9QwFA7uiuCLeLfrKlEUQSl20lwfh8VlFMcHdWHfYtokrrDbynZG2H_vOWlmsK4KwvSpJ2nanJzL5Mt3CHnWmJa5qNoyaldBgtLoEuK4uuRGNlxJ41Wq1rD8IBdH_N2xOM5k0XgW5tf9-5mWrwfwRzOEW8EFzr3kO-SqQJox3JeVBxujK0AvVd60_GOzidvJxnfnBLGPlwPLy_jI3zZJk-85vElu5KCRzsdZvkWuhO42uTaWkby4Q75g1c1U62E10L6jiMlweMycdiPImyYDR5GtCbpBVzb-A0iHdZMYq1OzZcYW0uVFOO3PHMUChxQhpHfJ0eGbzweLMldOKFuhq1VpQhWYF567ymsTtWgCi6x1AaKBWMVahughN-UhGuFq5RXXvo5SsbppdO1DfY_sdn0XHhAatTc-SMl80_KmUk6YyqsYPfwChB8FqTYf1raZVhzf-NSm9EJLO86FrfCCubC8IC-3Tb6PnBr_En6Ks2WRq6JDMMxXtx4G-_bTRzsXUiNlmREFeZGFYg8Pb10-WwCvgPRWE8n9iSQspnZy-zkoxXZUyL29mL8HabAHZzgqMHhM_JgV5MlGbSx2gUi1LvTrwUJAZbiqIZEtyP1RjbbdMSM05KOyIGqiYJPnTe90304S57fQWB0Oxvdqo4o2G5vh799u77-kH5LrLC2YumSzfbK7Ol-HRxBxrZrHaa39BKN8I_E priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Constraints on signaling network logic reveal functional subgraphs on Multiple Myeloma OMIC data |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12918-018-0551-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29589566 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2019473828 https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-01804825 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5872385 |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfWTUi8IL7JGJVBICRQIHX8lQeESrWpIDqhQaW-mSS22aQuhaVF9L_nzkkrhQ2E1DxUuTiOfee7iy-_HyFPi6xkuVdl7HWeQIJS6BjiuDTmmSy4kplVga1hcizHU_5hJmY7ZENv1Q5gfWVqh3xS04v5q18_1m_B4N8Eg9fydQ0-a4AlWXBAABDzHtkDxyRRySd8u6kgQHcD14oSLEbYk3aT88omOm6qXax7p1greTkQvVxP-cemavBVRzfJjTbIpMNGK26RHVfdJtca2sn1HfIVWToDN8SypouKYg1Hjp-l06opCqdhQaSI7gTNoOtr3hjSelUEhOtw2aStRaSTtZsvznOKhIgUS07vkunR4ZfROG6ZFuJS6GQZZy5xzArL88TqzGtROOZZmTuIHnziU-m8hVyWO5-JPFVWcW1TLxVLi0Kn1qX3yG61qNwDQr22mXVSMluUvEhULrLEKu8t_ByEKxFJNgNryhaGHJ94bkI6oqVp5sIkeMBcGB6RF9tLvjcYHP8SfoKzZRDbosLimW_5qq7N-88nZiikRoizTETkeSvkF3DzMm-_RYBHQDisjuRBRxKMr-ycfgZKse0VYnWPhx9BGtaPc-wVLJBM_BxE5PFGbQw2gZVtlVusagMBWMZVColvRO43arRtjmVCQ_4qI6I6Cta5X_dMdXYaMMKFRjY56N_LjSqajW39fez2_2fsHpLrLNhJGrPBAdldXqzcIwjMlkWf9NRM9cneu8PjTyfwbyRH_WCCvwHaMzW2 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELZoEYIL4k2ggEEgJKqIbOLncVVRbWG3B2il3kwc2xSpTRDZReq_Z8bxrggFJKTNKWPHicfzWH_-hpCXVjdlHWSTB1UXkKBYlUMcV-VMC8uk0E7Gag2LQzE7Zu9P-Ekii8azML_u30-UeNuDP5og3AoucO452yJXGSTKcV9W7K2NLge9lGnT8o_NRm4nGd-tU8Q-Xg4sL-Mjf9skjb5n_xa5mYJGOh1m-Ta54ts75NpQRvLiLvmMVTdjrYdlT7uWIiajxmPmtB1A3jQaOIpsTdANurLhH0Dar2xkrI7NFglbSBcX_qw7rykWOKQIIb1HjvffHe3N8lQ5IW-4Kpa59oUvHXesLpzSQXHry1A2tYdoIBShEj44yE2ZD5rXlXSSKVcFIcvKWlU5X90n223X-oeEBuW080KUzjbMFrLmunAyBAc_D-FHRor1hzVNohXHNz4zMb1QwgxzYQq8YC4My8ibTZNvA6fGv4Rf4GwZ5KpoEQzzpV71vTn49NFMuVBIWaZ5Rl4nodDBw5s6nS2AV0B6q5HkzkgSFlMzuv0KlGIzKuTenk3nIA324BxHBQav5D8mGXm-VhuDXSBSrfXdqjcQUGkmK0hkM_JgUKNNd6XmCvJRkRE5UrDR88Z32q-nkfObK6wOB-PbXauiScam__u3e_Rf0s_I9dnRYm7mB4cfHpMbZVw8VV5Odsj28vvKP4Hoa2mfxnX3E3-zJt4 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFLbYEIgXxJ3AAINASKBoqRPfHqtC1cE6IWDS3jw7thnSlkykRdq_55xcKoUBElLzlGPHiY_Ppf78HUJeOl0yG2WZRmUzSFCcSiGOy9NCC1dIob1sqzUsD8TisPhwxI_6OqfNgHYftiS7Mw3I0lStds997Ja4ErsNeKkJgrDgApefFlvkKiQqEyTPn4nZYIo5aKvstzL_2GzkjHqTvHWCiMjL4eZl1ORvW6etR5rfIjf7UJJOu7m_Ta6E6g651hWXvLhLjrEWZ1sBYtXQuqKI1LB4-JxWHfSbtmaPIocTdIMOrvtfkDZr1_JYt82WPeKQLi_CaX1mKZY9pAgsvUcO5--_zhZpX08hLbnKVqkOWWCe-8JmXumouAssstIGiBFiFnMRooeMtQhRc5tLLwvl8ygky51TuQ_5fbJd1VV4SGhUXvsgBPOuLFwmLdeZlzF6-AUIShKSDR_WlD3ZOL7xqWmTDiVMNxcmwwvmwhQJebNpct4xbfxL-AXOlkEGiwohMt_sumnM3pfPZsqFQiIzzRPyuheKNTy8tP2JA3gFJL0aSe6MJGGJlaPbr0ApNqNCRu7FdB-kwUqc4ajADDL-c5KQ54PaGOwC8WtVqNeNgTBLFzKH9DYhDzo12nTHNFeQpYqEyJGCjZ43vlN9P2mZwLnCmnEwvreDKpreBDV__3aP_kv6Gbn-6d3c7O8dfHxMbrB27eQpm-yQ7dWPdXgCIdnKPW2X3S-MFS8l |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constraints+on+signaling+network+logic+reveal+functional+subgraphs+on+Multiple+Myeloma+OMIC+data&rft.jtitle=BMC+systems+biology&rft.au=Miannay%2C+Bertrand&rft.au=Minvielle%2C+St%C3%A9phane&rft.au=Magrangeas%2C+Florence&rft.au=Guziolowski%2C+Carito&rft.date=2018-03-21&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1752-0509&rft.eissn=1752-0509&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=Suppl+3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12918-018-0551-4&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A568043095 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1752-0509&client=summon |