Radiation dose evaluation of pediatric patients in CT brain examination: multi-center study

There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 4663 - 6
Main Authors Eddy, Fotso Kamdem, Ngano, Samba Odette, Jervé, Fotue Alain, Serge, Abogo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 25.02.2021
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-021-84078-z

Cover

Abstract There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1–4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5–9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10–14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France’s DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.
AbstractList There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1-4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5-9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10-14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France's DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1-4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5-9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10-14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France's DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.
There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1–4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5–9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10–14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France’s DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.
There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1–4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5–9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10–14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France’s DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.
Abstract There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has DRL allowing them to optimize their examination protocol. For the sake of radiation protection, we have proposed to evaluate the dose and acquisition parameters delivered to our pediatric patients to optimize the protocols used. We also compared the 75th percentile values of dose parameters by acquisition between the three hospitals to Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) of France. In this retrospective and evaluative multicenter study, a total of 320 patients who had at least one cranial CT scan were enrolled from three medical centers. The CT acquisition parameters including tube potential (kV), tube current (mA), slice Thickness (T), spiral or sequential scanning techniques, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) were analyzed. CTDIvol values in our centers were found up to 17.42%, 46.01%, 21.56% respectively for children aged 1–4 higher than values of France's DRL. For those aged 5–9, we obtained 44.58%, 43.15%, 42.21% respectively. In addition, for children aged 10–14 there are also up to 47.73%, 44.11%, 46.39% respectively higher than values of France's DRL. It is similary for DLP values. The study showed a significant dosimetric overshoot compared to the France’s DRL and prompted us to make corrections to the protocols used and to a more rigorous monitoring of the principles of radiation protection and optimization rules in pediatric computed tomography in our hospitals. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. The development of DRL for improving the pediatric CT scan in our country is necessary to optimize our protocols. Our results have led us to make changes to our protocols which are the subject of a new dosimetric evaluation. It would be necessary to set up a quality control structure in Cameroon and their applications in current practice.
ArticleNumber 4663
Author Jervé, Fotue Alain
Serge, Abogo
Eddy, Fotso Kamdem
Ngano, Samba Odette
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Fotso Kamdem
  surname: Eddy
  fullname: Eddy, Fotso Kamdem
  email: eddyfotsokamdem@yahoo.fr
  organization: Unité de Recherche de la Matière Condensée, d’Electronique et de Traitement du Signal, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Samba Odette
  surname: Ngano
  fullname: Ngano, Samba Odette
  organization: Unité de Recherche de la Matière Condensée, d’Electronique et de Traitement du Signal, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, Department of Radiography, Yaoundé General Hospital
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Fotue Alain
  surname: Jervé
  fullname: Jervé, Fotue Alain
  organization: Unité de Recherche de la Matière Condensée, d’Electronique et de Traitement du Signal, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Abogo
  surname: Serge
  fullname: Serge, Abogo
  organization: Department of Radiology, National Social Insurance Fund Hospital
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kktv1DAUhS1UREvpH2CBIrFhE_AztlkgVSMelSohodmxsBw_Bo8y9mAnFe2vx5mU0nZRb-zY3zk5174vwVFM0QHwGsH3CBLxoVDEpGghRq2gkIv25hk4wZCyFhOMj-6tj8FZKVtYB8OSIvkCHBPSEYIRPAE_f2gb9BhSbGwqrnFXepiW7-SbvZsPczDNvu65OJYmxGa1bvqs68L90bsQD_THZjcNY2hNhVxuyjjZ61fguddDcWe38ylYf_m8Xn1rL79_vVidX7aGcTm2xkjbew8ptRwLDh3uLUZIOMO0ZV7yjlrTSa057QUy0kNOJRWslxxyxMgpuFhsbdJbtc9hp_O1Sjqow0bKG6XzGMzgFMU9IwihntTb8Q5L7b3tsbQMY8EErF6fFq_91O-cnavJenhg-vAkhl9qk64Ul7CmIdXg3a1BTr8nV0a1C8W4YdDRpakoXKNjWcub0beP0G2acqw3NVMEM9Z1XaXe3E90F-XfE1YAL4DJqZTs_B2CoJpbRS2tomqrqEOrqJsqEo9EJoyHh6xVheFpKVmkpf4nblz-H_sJ1V8fntNN
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_20503121241266323
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_024_06902_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography8020079
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2022_110653
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmrs_824
crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20220482
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2021_109695
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2022_110271
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)72471-0
10.1148/rg.226025128
10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2876562
10.2214/AJR.12.9026
10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2
10.1148/radiol.2521081554
10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81394-0
10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401
10.1109/TMI.2017.2715284
10.4236/ojrad.2019.94017
10.2214/AJR.09.4091
10.4236/ojmi.2017.71001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2021
The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2021
– notice: The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88A
88E
88I
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0S
M1P
M2P
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-84078-z
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Biology Database (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Science Database
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Biology Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database

CrossRef
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 2045-2322
EndPage 6
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_42b53111b3204fe29affdb29d5228580
PMC7907073
33633210
10_1038_s41598_021_84078_z
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations France
Cameroon
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Cameroon
– name: France
GroupedDBID 0R~
3V.
4.4
53G
5VS
7X7
88A
88E
88I
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAKDD
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACSMW
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AJTQC
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
DIK
DWQXO
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HH5
HMCUK
HYE
KQ8
LK8
M0L
M1P
M2P
M48
M7P
M~E
NAO
OK1
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RNT
RNTTT
RPM
SNYQT
UKHRP
AASML
AAYXX
AFPKN
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7XB
8FK
AARCD
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-cc9dbff044d72870e2bd2118ec5ad5f9764dc69aa74b81c9f0749485b9707153
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2045-2322
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:23:14 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:20:16 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 12:02:07 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 11:26:26 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:34 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:07:34 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:39:24 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c579t-cc9dbff044d72870e2bd2118ec5ad5f9764dc69aa74b81c9f0749485b9707153
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1038/s41598-021-84078-z
PMID 33633210
PQID 2493255666
PQPubID 2041939
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_42b53111b3204fe29affdb29d5228580
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7907073
proquest_miscellaneous_2494292113
proquest_journals_2493255666
pubmed_primary_33633210
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_84078_z
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_s41598_021_84078_z
springer_journals_10_1038_s41598_021_84078_z
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-02-25
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-02-25
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-02-25
  day: 25
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Scientific reports
PublicationTitleAbbrev Sci Rep
PublicationTitleAlternate Sci Rep
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing Group UK
– name: Nature Publishing Group
– name: Nature Portfolio
References Deschênes, S. Effets de la radiation en imagerie diagnostique. Reseau mère-enfant Ph. D. Physicien médical, CHU Ste-Justine. sylvain.deschenes@recherchesylvain.recherche-ste-Justine.qc.ca. pp 23–33 (2015).
IAEA. Radiation protection of patients, CT optimization. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur : https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/HealthProfessionals/1_Radiology/ComputedTomography/CTOptimization.htm (2011).
PapadimitroulasPKostouTChatzipapasKA review on personalized pediatric dosimetry applications using advanced computational toolsIEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.201810.1109/TRPMS.2018.2876562
HollingsworthCFrushDPCrossMLucayaJHelical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patientsAm. J. Roentgenol.200318040140610.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401
IRSN. Doses délivrées aux patients en scanographie et en radiologie conventionnelle. Résultats d’une enquête multicentrique en secteur public. Rapport DRPH/SER N°2010–12. Direction de la radioprotection de l’homme. Service d’Etudes et d’Expertises en Radioprotection. 13–26 (2010).
FotsoKEReduce absorbed doses and protection of radiosensitive organs of children exposed to ionizing radiation on adult scannersInsights Med. Phys.2019414
SFIPP. Critères de qualité et optimisation des doses en scanographie chez l’enfant. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur http://www.sfipradiopediatrie.org/images/storie/docs_telechargement/guideprocedurestdmpedi06.pdf (2006).
Conseil de l’union européenneDirective 97/43 EURATOM du Conseil du 30 juin 1997 relative à la protection sanitaire des personnes contre les dangers des rayonnements ionisants lors d’exposition à des fins médicales1997BelgiqueBruxelles
Protection et Sûreté RadiologiquesPublication 73 de la Commission Internationale de Protection Radiologique (CIPR)1996ParisNucléon
DonnellyLFReducing radiation dose associated with pediatric ct by decreasing unnecessary examinationsAm. J. Roentgenol.20051842524253510.2214/ajr.184.2.01840655
McNitt-Gray, M F. “AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT.” Radiographics 22, no. 6 (January 1, 2002): 1541.
Geleijns, J. Optimisation of radiation protection for pediatric and adult patients in radiography and computed tomography, Proceedings Third European IRPA Congress 2010, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 2972–80 (2010).
MoifoBDiagnostic reference levels of adults ct-scan imaging in cameroon: a pilot study of four commonest ct-protocols in five radiology departmentsOpen J. Med. Imaging201771810.4236/ojmi.2017.71001
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP26, 1–47 (1996).
JORF Arrêté du 24 octobre 2011 relatif aux niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire. Paris, France (2012).
Arrêté du 23 mai 2019 portant homologation de la décision n° 2019-DC-0667 de l'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire du 18 avril 2019 relative aux modalités d'évaluation des doses de rayonnements ionisants délivrées aux patients lors d'un acte de radiologie, de pratiques interventionnelles radioguidées ou de médecine nucléaire et à la mise à jour des niveaux de référence diagnostiques associés. NOR: SSAP1915191A (2019).
MabilleMBeauvais-MarchHRehelJ-LKalifaGÉvaluation des doses d’irradiation aux organes en scanographie pédiatriqueJ. Radiol.2005864874911:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvkslGmsg%3D%3D10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81394-0
StraussKJImage gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patientsAm. J. Roentgenol.201019486887310.2214/AJR.09.4091
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. ICRP Supporting Guidance 2. Ann ICRP31, 33–52 (2001).
TakamCADose optimization in computer tomography pediatric cranial scansOpen J. Radiol.2019918119310.4236/ojrad.2019.94017
International Commission on Radiological Protection Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Ann ICRP37, 1–64 (2007).
FotsoKESambaONFotueAJFaiLCProtection of the eyes, thyroid and gonads in pediatric tomodensitometry: use of the leaded ApronAASCIT J. Health.20206118
BrisseHAubertBNiveaux d’exposition en tomodensitométrie multicoupes pédiatrique : résultats de l’enquête dosimétrique SFIPP/IRSN 2007–2008J. Radiol.2009902072151:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3ivVCqsA%3D%3D10.1016/S0221-0363(09)72471-0
DIRECTIVE 97/43/EURATOM DU CONSEIL du 30 juin 1997 relative à la protection sanitaire des personnes lors d'expositions aux rayonnements ionisants à des fins médicales (1997).
FotsoKESambaONAbogoSFotueAJTechniques to optimize the exposure of pediatric patients on adult scannersAASCIT J. Health.202062913
ClaudiaZPediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation doseAJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2013200595095610.2214/AJR.12.9026
IRSN. Rapport DRPH n°2010–15. Analyse des données relatives à la mise à jour des niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire. Bilan 2007–2008. Paris, France (2010).
ValentinJManaging patient dose in multi-detector computed tomographyAnn. ICRP2007371791:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjjt1eitA%3D%3D18555921
SFR. Guide pratique à l'usage des médecins radiologues. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur http://www.sfrnet.org/sfr/societe/2-publications/publications-sfr/01Guides2009/index.pht ml (2009).
International Commission on Radiological Protection 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP21, 1–201 (1991).
ChenHZhangYKalraMKLow-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network (RED-CNN)IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging201710.1109/TMI.2017.2715284291928865711606
SinghSDose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studiesRadiology200925220020810.1148/radiol.2521081554
84078_CR5
84078_CR6
84078_CR8
84078_CR1
84078_CR2
KJ Strauss (84078_CR28) 2010; 194
84078_CR3
84078_CR4
Conseil de l’union européenne (84078_CR11) 1997
84078_CR21
Z Claudia (84078_CR24) 2013; 200
H Chen (84078_CR20) 2017
P Papadimitroulas (84078_CR19) 2018
84078_CR23
84078_CR25
J Valentin (84078_CR9) 2007; 37
S Singh (84078_CR27) 2009; 252
KE Fotso (84078_CR15) 2020; 6
LF Donnelly (84078_CR32) 2005; 184
KE Fotso (84078_CR17) 2019; 4
84078_CR30
84078_CR31
84078_CR10
M Mabille (84078_CR12) 2005; 86
KE Fotso (84078_CR18) 2020; 6
84078_CR13
84078_CR14
Protection et Sûreté Radiologiques (84078_CR22) 1996
CA Takam (84078_CR16) 2019; 9
C Hollingsworth (84078_CR26) 2003; 180
H Brisse (84078_CR7) 2009; 90
B Moifo (84078_CR29) 2017; 7
References_xml – reference: FotsoKEReduce absorbed doses and protection of radiosensitive organs of children exposed to ionizing radiation on adult scannersInsights Med. Phys.2019414
– reference: Deschênes, S. Effets de la radiation en imagerie diagnostique. Reseau mère-enfant Ph. D. Physicien médical, CHU Ste-Justine. sylvain.deschenes@recherchesylvain.recherche-ste-Justine.qc.ca. pp 23–33 (2015).
– reference: ValentinJManaging patient dose in multi-detector computed tomographyAnn. ICRP2007371791:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjjt1eitA%3D%3D18555921
– reference: FotsoKESambaONAbogoSFotueAJTechniques to optimize the exposure of pediatric patients on adult scannersAASCIT J. Health.202062913
– reference: ChenHZhangYKalraMKLow-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network (RED-CNN)IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging201710.1109/TMI.2017.2715284291928865711606
– reference: McNitt-Gray, M F. “AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT.” Radiographics 22, no. 6 (January 1, 2002): 1541.
– reference: IRSN. Rapport DRPH n°2010–15. Analyse des données relatives à la mise à jour des niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire. Bilan 2007–2008. Paris, France (2010).
– reference: International Commission on Radiological Protection 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP21, 1–201 (1991).
– reference: International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP26, 1–47 (1996).
– reference: IAEA. Radiation protection of patients, CT optimization. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur : https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/HealthProfessionals/1_Radiology/ComputedTomography/CTOptimization.htm (2011).
– reference: MabilleMBeauvais-MarchHRehelJ-LKalifaGÉvaluation des doses d’irradiation aux organes en scanographie pédiatriqueJ. Radiol.2005864874911:STN:280:DC%2BD2MvkslGmsg%3D%3D10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81394-0
– reference: DonnellyLFReducing radiation dose associated with pediatric ct by decreasing unnecessary examinationsAm. J. Roentgenol.20051842524253510.2214/ajr.184.2.01840655
– reference: StraussKJImage gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patientsAm. J. Roentgenol.201019486887310.2214/AJR.09.4091
– reference: JORF Arrêté du 24 octobre 2011 relatif aux niveaux de référence diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire. Paris, France (2012).
– reference: IRSN. Doses délivrées aux patients en scanographie et en radiologie conventionnelle. Résultats d’une enquête multicentrique en secteur public. Rapport DRPH/SER N°2010–12. Direction de la radioprotection de l’homme. Service d’Etudes et d’Expertises en Radioprotection. 13–26 (2010).
– reference: PapadimitroulasPKostouTChatzipapasKA review on personalized pediatric dosimetry applications using advanced computational toolsIEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.201810.1109/TRPMS.2018.2876562
– reference: SFIPP. Critères de qualité et optimisation des doses en scanographie chez l’enfant. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur http://www.sfipradiopediatrie.org/images/storie/docs_telechargement/guideprocedurestdmpedi06.pdf (2006).
– reference: International Commission on Radiological Protection Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Ann ICRP37, 1–64 (2007).
– reference: Geleijns, J. Optimisation of radiation protection for pediatric and adult patients in radiography and computed tomography, Proceedings Third European IRPA Congress 2010, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 2972–80 (2010).
– reference: Arrêté du 23 mai 2019 portant homologation de la décision n° 2019-DC-0667 de l'Autorité de sûreté nucléaire du 18 avril 2019 relative aux modalités d'évaluation des doses de rayonnements ionisants délivrées aux patients lors d'un acte de radiologie, de pratiques interventionnelles radioguidées ou de médecine nucléaire et à la mise à jour des niveaux de référence diagnostiques associés. NOR: SSAP1915191A (2019).
– reference: SFR. Guide pratique à l'usage des médecins radiologues. Accès le 19 Mars 2020 sur http://www.sfrnet.org/sfr/societe/2-publications/publications-sfr/01Guides2009/index.pht ml (2009).
– reference: TakamCADose optimization in computer tomography pediatric cranial scansOpen J. Radiol.2019918119310.4236/ojrad.2019.94017
– reference: ClaudiaZPediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation doseAJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2013200595095610.2214/AJR.12.9026
– reference: FotsoKESambaONFotueAJFaiLCProtection of the eyes, thyroid and gonads in pediatric tomodensitometry: use of the leaded ApronAASCIT J. Health.20206118
– reference: Conseil de l’union européenneDirective 97/43 EURATOM du Conseil du 30 juin 1997 relative à la protection sanitaire des personnes contre les dangers des rayonnements ionisants lors d’exposition à des fins médicales1997BelgiqueBruxelles
– reference: DIRECTIVE 97/43/EURATOM DU CONSEIL du 30 juin 1997 relative à la protection sanitaire des personnes lors d'expositions aux rayonnements ionisants à des fins médicales (1997).
– reference: SinghSDose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studiesRadiology200925220020810.1148/radiol.2521081554
– reference: BrisseHAubertBNiveaux d’exposition en tomodensitométrie multicoupes pédiatrique : résultats de l’enquête dosimétrique SFIPP/IRSN 2007–2008J. Radiol.2009902072151:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3ivVCqsA%3D%3D10.1016/S0221-0363(09)72471-0
– reference: Protection et Sûreté RadiologiquesPublication 73 de la Commission Internationale de Protection Radiologique (CIPR)1996ParisNucléon
– reference: HollingsworthCFrushDPCrossMLucayaJHelical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patientsAm. J. Roentgenol.200318040140610.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401
– reference: MoifoBDiagnostic reference levels of adults ct-scan imaging in cameroon: a pilot study of four commonest ct-protocols in five radiology departmentsOpen J. Med. Imaging201771810.4236/ojmi.2017.71001
– reference: International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. ICRP Supporting Guidance 2. Ann ICRP31, 33–52 (2001).
– volume: 90
  start-page: 207
  year: 2009
  ident: 84078_CR7
  publication-title: J. Radiol.
  doi: 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)72471-0
– ident: 84078_CR25
– volume: 6
  start-page: 9
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 84078_CR18
  publication-title: AASCIT J. Health.
– ident: 84078_CR21
– ident: 84078_CR5
– ident: 84078_CR23
  doi: 10.1148/rg.226025128
– year: 2018
  ident: 84078_CR19
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.
  doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2876562
– ident: 84078_CR1
– ident: 84078_CR13
– ident: 84078_CR30
– volume: 184
  start-page: 2524
  year: 2005
  ident: 84078_CR32
  publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol.
– volume: 200
  start-page: 950
  issue: 5
  year: 2013
  ident: 84078_CR24
  publication-title: AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9026
– ident: 84078_CR3
  doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2
– volume: 252
  start-page: 200
  year: 2009
  ident: 84078_CR27
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2521081554
– volume: 86
  start-page: 487
  year: 2005
  ident: 84078_CR12
  publication-title: J. Radiol.
  doi: 10.1016/S0221-0363(05)81394-0
– ident: 84078_CR8
– volume: 180
  start-page: 401
  year: 2003
  ident: 84078_CR26
  publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol.
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 84078_CR15
  publication-title: AASCIT J. Health.
– year: 2017
  ident: 84078_CR20
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2715284
– volume-title: Directive 97/43 EURATOM du Conseil du 30 juin 1997 relative à la protection sanitaire des personnes contre les dangers des rayonnements ionisants lors d’exposition à des fins médicales
  year: 1997
  ident: 84078_CR11
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  ident: 84078_CR9
  publication-title: Ann. ICRP
– ident: 84078_CR6
– ident: 84078_CR4
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 84078_CR17
  publication-title: Insights Med. Phys.
– ident: 84078_CR10
– ident: 84078_CR2
– volume: 9
  start-page: 181
  year: 2019
  ident: 84078_CR16
  publication-title: Open J. Radiol.
  doi: 10.4236/ojrad.2019.94017
– ident: 84078_CR14
– ident: 84078_CR31
– volume: 194
  start-page: 868
  year: 2010
  ident: 84078_CR28
  publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol.
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4091
– volume-title: Publication 73 de la Commission Internationale de Protection Radiologique (CIPR)
  year: 1996
  ident: 84078_CR22
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 84078_CR29
  publication-title: Open J. Med. Imaging
  doi: 10.4236/ojmi.2017.71001
SSID ssj0000529419
Score 2.369314
Snippet There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European country, has...
Abstract There is currently no Pediatric Regulatory Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) in Cameroon to standardize protocols in hospitals. France, a European...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 4663
SubjectTerms 631/57
631/67
639/766
Adolescent
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Computed tomography
Dose-response effects
Hospitals
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Infant
Medical imaging
multidisciplinary
Patients
Pediatrics
Quality control
Radiation Dosage
Radiation protection
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSxxBEG6CIOQSouYxiYYO5GYap18z095UIhLQg2xAyKHp6gcRwqy4KyT-ert6Zlc3Ly-5ztQ0RT2mq6iqrwj5IAIu5QZgQtTAlM__wRxGtCwol7QOTvEyX3F61px8UZ8v9MWDVV_YEzbAAw-C21MCsplwDvlMlaIwLqUAwoQcOHS6K9l6beoHydSA6i2M4mackqlltzfLNxVOkwnOOqxdsduVm6gA9v8pyvy9WfKXimm5iI6fk2djBEkPBs43yJPYb5L1Yafkzy3y9RzRBlDcNExnkd7DedNpoleLzRx0BFSd0cueHk0o4KoIGn84bI1B6n1aeg0ZMhSvaYGhfUEmx58mRyds3KDAvG7NnHlvAqRUKxVarGhGASFnfF302gWdciiigm-Mc62CjnuTckCBcDFg2hx6aPmSrPXTPr4mtGuN0AC1azSoLHyIdeTap-ggSpCmInwhTOtHdHFccvHdliq37OygAJsVYIsC7G1FdpffXA3YGv-kPkQdLSkRF7s8yNZiR2uxj1lLRbYXGrajs85szkAlIrE1TUXeL19nN8Paievj9KbQ4GIvzmVFXg0GseREykbiKFRF2hVTWWF19U1_-a1AebcG4ZbymR8XRnXP1t9F8eZ_iOIteSrQG3A8X2-Ttfn1TdzJAdYc3hVfugOpsSB4
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3raxQxEA-1RfCL-Ha1SgS_aejmtbsRRGxpKYKHlBMKfgh5akF2z7sraP96M9nHcT76dZNdZjOTySST-f0Qesk8kHJbSxgrLREu-cEURtTECxOl9EbQXF_xcVadfhYfzuX5DpqNtTBwrXL0idlR-87BGflB2iZwgMuqqneLHwRYoyC7OlJomIFawb_NEGM30F5yyU2y-73D49mns-nUBfJagqqheqbkzcEqrWBQZcYoaSCnRa62VqgM5P-v6PPvS5R_ZFLzAnVyB90eIkv8vjeFu2gntPfQzZ5r8td99OUMUAhADdh3q4A3MN-4i3gxMnbgAWh1hS9afDTHFigkcPhp4MoM9H6D8x1EAgKFJc7wtA_Q_OR4fnRKBmYF4mSt1sQ55W2MpRC-hkxnYNannWATnDRexhSiCO8qZUwtbEOdiinQABgZq-oUkkj-EO22XRseI9zUiklrS1NJK5SXNpSBSheDsYFbrgpEx8HUbkAdB_KL7zpnv3mjewXopACdFaCvCvRqemfRY25c2_sQdDT1BLzs_KBbftXD9NOC2eRsKLXJMkUMTJkYvWVJYMYa2ZQF2h81rIdJvNIbkyvQi6k5TT_IqZg2dJe5DxB-UcoL9Kg3iEkSzisOJVIFqrdMZUvU7Zb24luG-K4VwDClb74ejWoj1v-H4sn1f_EU3WJg51CQL_fR7np5GZ6lkGptnw_z5DeAIB9b
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature HAS Fully OA
  dbid: AAJSJ
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3daxQxEB_qFcEXsX6ubSWCb7q4-drd-HYWSznQBz2h4ENINoktyG65u4L2r28m-1FOq-DrZhKGzCQz2Zn5DcAr5rApt7U5Y4XNRRPvwehGVLkTJkjpjKCpvuLjp_Lkq1icytMdYGMtTEraT5CW6Zoes8PerqOhwWIwRvMaQ0_51R3YraP5YzPYnc8XXxbTnxWMXQmqhgqZgte3TN6yQgms_zYP889Eyd-ipckIHT-A-4P3SOY9v3uw49uHcLfvJ_nrEXz7jEgDuNXEdWtPbqC8SRfIxdiVgwxgqmty3pKjJbHYJoL4nwbTYpD6HUl5hjky5FckQdA-huXxh-XRST50T8gbWalN3jTK2RAKIVyF0UzPrIuvvdo30jgZohsiXFMqYypha9qoEJ0JhIqxqopuh-RPYNZ2rX8GpK4Uk9YWppRWKCetLzyVTfDGem65yoCOm6mbAVkcG1z80CnCzWvdC0BHAegkAH2VwetpzkWPq_FP6vcoo4kSMbHTh271XQ86ogWz8UKh1EbtE8EzZUJwlkWGGatlXWRwMEpYDwd1rePrkyMKW1lm8HIajkcM4yam9d1losGmXpTyDJ72CjFxwnnJsQwqg2pLVbZY3R5pz88SjHelEGoprvlmVKobtv6-Fc__j3wf7jHUeyzClwcw26wu_WF0ozb2xXBurgG1gBh_
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Radiation dose evaluation of pediatric patients in CT brain examination: multi-center study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/s41598-021-84078-z
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633210
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2493255666
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2494292113
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7907073
https://doaj.org/article/42b53111b3204fe29affdb29d5228580
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swED_6wUZfxj47b13QYG-bN0uWLGswRhpaSqBldCkE9iAsS94Kxe6SFNr-9dPJdkq2bA97MliyfejupJNP9_sBvGEWSbmNiRlLTMxLPw_6MELGlheVELbgNNRXHJ9kR2d8PBXTDejpjroBnK_d2iGf1Nns4v31z5vP3uE_tSXj-Ye5X4SwUIzROMe0VHy7Cdt-ZcpwM3bchfst1jdTnKqudmb9oztwP02zFEtbVpaqgOi_Lgz98zTlbynVsFIdPoQHXYhJhq1NPIINVz-Gey3p5M0T-HaKcASoD2KbuSN3eN-kqchlT91BOsTVOTmvyWhCDHJJEHdd4NkZ7P2RhMOIMQrkZiTg1D6FyeHBZHQUdxQLcSmkWsRlqaypqoRzKzHl6ZixfkuYu1IUVlQ-VuG2zFRRSG5yWqrKRxyIJ2OU9LGJSJ_BVt3U7jmQXComjEmKTBiurDAucVSUlSuMS02qIqD9YOqygx9HFowLHdLgaa5bXWivCx10oW8jeLt85rIF3_hn733U0bInAmeHG83su-78UHNm_KxDqfEmyivHVFFV1jAvMGO5yJMI9noN694Ytd-ipgjVlmURvF42ez_E5EpRu-Yq9EHmL0rTCHZbg1hK0htUBHLFVFZEXW2pz38ErG-pEI_Jv_Ndb1R3Yv19KF7894dewg5Db8CifbEHW4vZlXvlw66FGcCmnMoBbA-H469jf90_OPly6u-OstEg_MoYBG_7BVC2L2U
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB5VWyG4IN4EChgJThA1cewkRqoQLa22tF2hapEqcbDs2IFKKFk2W0H73_hveJzHann01mviRBPPy854vg_gBTVIyq11SGmkQ1a4OOiWEVlomCo5N4rFvr_iaJKOP7EPJ_xkDX71vTB4rLKPiT5Qm7rAf-SbbpuQIFxWmr6dfQ-RNQqrqz2FhuqoFcyWhxjrGjsO7PkPt4VrtvbfO32_pHRvd7ozDjuWgbDgmViERSGMLsuIMZNh1c9SbdyuKLcFV4aXLl0zU6RCqYzpPC5E6ZIuQqpokbn0jKQRLgOsM2xwHcH69u7k4_HwkwfLaCwWXbNOlOSbjUuY2NRG4zDHElp4sZIQPW_Avxa7f5_Z_KNw6_Ph3i242S1kybvW8m7Dmq3uwLWW2vL8Lnw-RtAD1DoxdWPJElWc1CWZ9QQhpMN1bchpRXamRCNjBbE_FZ7QwdFviD_yGKJAdk48Gu49mF7FFN-HUVVX9iGQPBOUax2plGsmDNc2sjEvSqu0TXQiAoj7yZRFB3KOXBvfpC-2J7lsFSCdAqRXgLwI4NXwzKyF-Lh09DbqaBiJ8Nz-Qj3_Ijtvl4xqF9viWDtHYKWlQpWl0dQJTGnO8yiAjV7DsosZjVxaeADPh9vO27GEoypbn_kxyC8Wx0kAD1qDGCRJkjTBjqwAshVTWRF19U51-tUjimcCUZ_cO1_3RrUU6_9T8ejyr3gG18fTo0N5uD85eAw3KNo8YgHwDRgt5mf2iVvNLfTTzmcIyCv20t-xsVuG
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLamTiBeEHcyBhgJniBq4thJjDQhdqk2BtU0FWkSD5Yd2zBpSkrbCbZ_yL_Cx3FSlcve9tq41anPzc455_sQekk0kHIrFROSqJhWLg66Y0QRayotY1rS1M9XfBrn-5_phxN2soZ-dbMw0FbZxUQfqHVTwTvyobsmZACXledDG9oijnZH76bfY2CQgkprR6chA82C3vJwY2HI49Bc_HDXufnWwa7T_StCRnuTnf04MA7EFSv4Iq4qrpW1CaW6gAqgIUq7G1JpKiY1sy51U13lXMqCqjKtuHUJGOBVFC9cqgYCCZcN1guXJOkArW_vjY-O-xc-UFKjKQ-DO0lWDucuecKAG0njEspp8eVKcvQcAv86-P7dv_lHEdfnxtEddDscavH71grvojVT30M3WprLi_voyzEAIIAFYN3MDV4ijOPG4mlHFoIDxuscn9Z4Z4IVsFdg81NCtw6sfot9-2MMApkZ9si4D9DkOrb4IRrUTW0eI1wWnDClEpkzRblmyiQmZZU1UplMZTxCabeZogqA58C7cSZ84T0rRasA4RQgvALEZYRe99-ZtnAfV67eBh31KwGq23_QzL6K4PmCEuXiXJoq5xTUGsKltVoRJzAhJSuTCG12GhYhfszF0toj9KJ_7DwfyjmyNs25XwNcY2maRehRaxC9JFmWZzCdFaFixVRWRF19Up9-8-jiBQcEKPebbzqjWor1_63YuPpfPEc3nbeKjwfjwyfoFgGTB1gAtokGi9m5eeoOdgv1LLgMRuKanfQ3zVFfsg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation+dose+evaluation+of+pediatric+patients+in+CT+brain+examination%3A+multi-center+study&rft.jtitle=Scientific+reports&rft.au=Eddy%2C+Fotso+Kamdem&rft.au=Ngano%2C+Samba+Odette&rft.au=Jerv%C3%A9%2C+Fotue+Alain&rft.au=Serge%2C+Abogo&rft.date=2021-02-25&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group+UK&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft.volume=11&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fs41598-021-84078-z&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33633210&rft.externalDocID=PMC7907073
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-2322&client=summon