Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder
We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at...
Saved in:
Published in | General hospital psychiatry Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 327 - 333 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2009
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).
Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.
Most symptoms from the
DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.
Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Objective We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Method Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Results Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Conclusions Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis. We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis. We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis. We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVEWe sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.METHODEight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.RESULTSMost symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.CONCLUSIONSPregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis. |
Author | Gotman, Nathan Smith, Megan V. Yonkers, Kimberly Ann Belanger, Kathleen |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Medicine 1 Department of Psychiatry, at the Yale School of Medicine 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the Yale School of Medicine |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Psychiatry, at the Yale School of Medicine – name: 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the Yale School of Medicine – name: 3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Medicine |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kimberly Ann surname: Yonkers fullname: Yonkers, Kimberly Ann email: kimberly.yonkers@yale.edu organization: Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Megan V. surname: Smith fullname: Smith, Megan V. organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Nathan surname: Gotman fullname: Gotman, Nathan organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Kathleen surname: Belanger fullname: Belanger, Kathleen organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21699956$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19555792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkk2P0zAQhi20iO0u_AVkIcGtxR9xEnNYLSyf0koc6N1y7GnrktjBTivl3-PQUi0rIfXkwzzzeDTvXKELHzwg9IqSBSW0fLtdrMFvQur7NJrNghEiF4QvCBFP0IzWFZ9XFS0u0CzDfF7zgl-iq5S2JBNM8GfokkohRCXZDDXLsXdGtziFTg_O4DR2_RC6hMMK9xHWXnszYu0tHjbgInZdr82Ag8caW6fXPiT3B-70NkRsITel5PaQqylEC_E5errSbYIXx_caLT9_Wt59nd9___Lt7v393IiqGuZCcGNIAwSkkbWWjNnCMEttzZjUDa2ssFwTDjVd1VQ2uUbKhteSWMoE4dfo5qDtd00H1oAfom5VH12n46iCdurfincbtQ57xaqirgqeBW-Oghh-7SANqnPJQNtqD2GXVFkVjJRiAl8-_On0xd-tZuD1EdAp73YV8w5dOnGMllJKUWbu9sCZGFKKsFLGDTmFMA3oWkWJmgJXW_UwcDUFrghXOc6sePdIcZrmnOaPh2bIsewdRJWMA2_AughmUDa48zQ3jzSmdX66qp8wQtqGXfQ5eEVVYoqoH9NZTldJ5HSRpMiCD_8XnDvFb3jA_Tg |
CODEN | GHPSDB |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2011_602143 crossref_primary_10_1177_0004867415617657 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_020_02885_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_0167482X_2020_1770221 crossref_primary_10_1142_S179398442140002X crossref_primary_10_2196_53744 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0191782 crossref_primary_10_2196_53508 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2013_09_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yfrne_2020_100854 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16178 crossref_primary_10_1002_wps_20778 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_05_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2014_02_012 crossref_primary_10_1080_03630242_2012_674090 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2017_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0191675 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2015_11_014 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_021_03793_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2018_03_011 crossref_primary_10_4081_rp_2021_352 crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2020_8862 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00737_016_0685_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2021_07_049 crossref_primary_10_1080_15402002_2020_1772265 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_12308 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0270873 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2013_08_013 crossref_primary_10_1080_02646838_2018_1448373 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_022_03418_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2024_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1002_j_1556_6678_2011_tb00102_x crossref_primary_10_2196_12574 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060907 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2014_03_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2010_04_011 crossref_primary_10_1097_YCO_0000000000000885 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2015_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbih_2024_100885 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_030365 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14734 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13685 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18136789 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_01468 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_08_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nurpra_2016_07_023 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_059033 crossref_primary_10_1517_14740338_2012_670419 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2011_05_004 |
Cites_doi | 10.1126/science.3287615 10.1002/depr.3050020606 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100053010 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1 10.1016/S0163-8343(01)00129-3 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060928 10.1007/s00737-002-0156-0 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01660.x 10.1007/s00737-006-0152-x 10.1097/01.nmd.0000248970.50265.34 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00187-6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2009 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. 2009 INIST-CNRS 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2009 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2009 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1873-7714 |
EndPage | 333 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC2748743 19555792 21699956 10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005 S0163834309000504 1_s2_0_S0163834309000504 |
Genre | Validation Study Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | United States North America America Massachusetts Connecticut |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Connecticut – name: Massachusetts |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: R01 HD045735 – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: 5 R01HD045735 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: R01 DA019135 – fundername: NIMH NIH HHS grantid: T32 MH014235 – fundername: NIMH NIH HHS grantid: T32MH014235 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29H 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AAEDT AAEDW AAGKA AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACIEU ACIUM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEG HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M29 M39 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OH0 OU- OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UHS WOW WUQ XPP Z5R ZGI ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-553cc0be0e9c98a922d4c2d1d8229ab17d5d3a03e81f819bc2d06b3890d12503 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0163-8343 1873-7714 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:23:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:40:33 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:53 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:36:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:39:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:33 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:21:04 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:05 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:32:53 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Pregnancy Women Mood disorders/unipolar Obstetrics and gynecology Social environment Human Mood disorder Mental health Depression Maternal diseases Obstetrics Symptomatology Follow up study Diagnosis Woman Public health |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c577t-553cc0be0e9c98a922d4c2d1d8229ab17d5d3a03e81f819bc2d06b3890d12503 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 In the past year, Dr. Yonkers received research grants from Eli Lilly and study drug from Pfizer for an NIMH trial. Drs. Belanger and Smith and Mr. Gotman have nothing to disclose. |
PMID | 19555792 |
PQID | 67420653 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2748743 proquest_miscellaneous_67420653 pubmed_primary_19555792 pascalfrancis_primary_21699956 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0163834309000504 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2009 text: 2009-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | General hospital psychiatry |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gen Hosp Psychiatry |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
References | Ross, Evans, Sellers, Romach (bib6) 2003; 6 Zimmerman, Chelminski, McGlinchey, Young (bib5) 2006; 194 Sugawara, Sakamoto, Kitamura, Toda, Shima (bib3) 1999; 54 Cox, Holden, Sagovsky (bib2) 1987; 150 Keller, Lavori, Mueller, Endicott, Coryell, Hirschfeld (bib15) 1992; 49 Cox, Holden (bib13) 1994 Kelly, Russo, Katon (bib7) 2001; 23 Milgrom, Ericksen, Negri, Gemmill (bib8) 2005; 39 Eberhard-Gran, Eskild, Tambs, Opjordsmoen, Ove Samuelsen (bib12) 2001; 104 Klein, Essex (bib1) 1995; 2 Matthey, Henshaw, Elliott, Barnett (bib9) 2006; 9 Andrews, Slade, Sunderland, Anderson (bib4) 2007; 164 Wittchen (bib11) 1994; 28 Swets (bib14) 1988; 240 WHO (bib10) 1997 Andrews (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib4) 2007; 164 Cox (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib13) 1994 Swets (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib14) 1988; 240 WHO (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib10) 1997 Matthey (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib9) 2006; 9 Milgrom (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib8) 2005; 39 Sugawara (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib3) 1999; 54 Klein (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib1) 1995; 2 Wittchen (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib11) 1994; 28 Zimmerman (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib5) 2006; 194 Eberhard-Gran (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib12) 2001; 104 Kelly (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib7) 2001; 23 Keller (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib15) 1992; 49 Cox (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib2) 1987; 150 Ross (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib6) 2003; 6 |
References_xml | – volume: 9 start-page: 309 year: 2006 end-page: 315 ident: bib9 article-title: Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health – volume: 54 start-page: 161 year: 1999 end-page: 169 ident: bib3 article-title: Structure of depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the postpartum period publication-title: J Affect Disord – volume: 23 start-page: 107 year: 2001 end-page: 113 ident: bib7 article-title: Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited? publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry – volume: 164 start-page: 1784 year: 2007 end-page: 1785 ident: bib4 article-title: Issues for publication-title: Am J Psychiatry – volume: 240 start-page: 1285 year: 1988 end-page: 1293 ident: bib14 article-title: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems publication-title: Science – volume: 2 start-page: 308 year: 1995 end-page: 314 ident: bib1 article-title: Pregnant or depressed? The effect of overlap between symptoms of depression and somatic complaints of pregnancy on rates of major depression in the second trimester publication-title: Depression – volume: 6 start-page: 59 year: 2003 end-page: 64 ident: bib6 article-title: Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 2: assessment of somatic symptoms using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health – year: 1994 ident: bib13 article-title: Perinatal psychiatry. Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale – volume: 194 start-page: 893 year: 2006 end-page: 897 ident: bib5 article-title: Diagnosing major depressive disorder: can the utility of the publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis – year: 1997 ident: bib10 article-title: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI, Version 2.1). Version 2.1 ed – volume: 104 start-page: 243 year: 2001 ident: bib12 article-title: Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand – volume: 28 start-page: 57 year: 1994 end-page: 84 ident: bib11 article-title: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review publication-title: J Psychiatr Res – volume: 49 start-page: 809 year: 1992 end-page: 816 ident: bib15 article-title: Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry – volume: 150 start-page: 782 year: 1987 end-page: 786 ident: bib2 article-title: Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale publication-title: Br J Psychiatry – volume: 39 start-page: 833 year: 2005 end-page: 839 ident: bib8 article-title: Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample publication-title: Aust N Z J Psychiatry – volume: 240 start-page: 1285 year: 1988 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib14 article-title: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.3287615 – volume: 2 start-page: 308 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib1 article-title: Pregnant or depressed? The effect of overlap between symptoms of depression and somatic complaints of pregnancy on rates of major depression in the second trimester publication-title: Depression doi: 10.1002/depr.3050020606 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib10 – volume: 49 start-page: 809 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib15 article-title: Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100053010 – volume: 104 start-page: 243 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib12 article-title: Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x – volume: 150 start-page: 782 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib2 article-title: Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale publication-title: Br J Psychiatry doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 – volume: 28 start-page: 57 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib11 article-title: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review publication-title: J Psychiatr Res doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1 – volume: 23 start-page: 107 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib7 article-title: Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited? publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/S0163-8343(01)00129-3 – volume: 164 start-page: 1784 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib4 article-title: Issues for DSM-V: simplifying DSM-IV to enhance utility: the case of major depressive disorder publication-title: Am J Psychiatry doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060928 – volume: 6 start-page: 59 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib6 article-title: Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 2: assessment of somatic symptoms using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health doi: 10.1007/s00737-002-0156-0 – volume: 39 start-page: 833 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib8 article-title: Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample publication-title: Aust N Z J Psychiatry doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01660.x – volume: 9 start-page: 309 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib9 article-title: Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health doi: 10.1007/s00737-006-0152-x – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib13 – volume: 194 start-page: 893 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib5 article-title: Diagnosing major depressive disorder: can the utility of the DSM-IV symptom criteria be improved? publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000248970.50265.34 – volume: 54 start-page: 161 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib3 article-title: Structure of depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the postpartum period publication-title: J Affect Disord doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00187-6 |
SSID | ssj0005253 |
Score | 2.1403346 |
Snippet | We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).
Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects... Abstract Objective We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Method Eight... We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVEWe sought to determine... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 327 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Algorithms Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic Connecticut Depression Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis Depressive Disorder, Major - drug therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Interview, Psychological - standards Logistic Models Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - standards Massachusetts Medical sciences Mood disorders Mood disorders/unipolar Obstetrics and gynecology Predictive Value of Tests Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis Pregnancy Complications - drug therapy Pregnancy Trimesters - physiology Pregnancy Trimesters - psychology Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychopathology. Psychiatry ROC Curve Women |
Title | Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0163834309000504 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0163834309000504 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19555792 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67420653 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2748743 |
Volume | 31 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Nb9QwELVKe0FCCMRXKCw-cA3r2LETC3GoKqoFRC8UqTfLdhy6VTeJNttKvfDbGcfOsgtFWolr7FFkz3g8I795g9BbTWpLc8tSJkuR5qXVacm0TQWXxJSQH7iBrunrqZh9zz-f8_M9dDzWwnhYZfT9wacP3jp-mcbdnHbz-fQb8aEEyxkZ-l56TtADyqQA0z44-vRldrqB9AhklDA_9QIj9-gA8wI1XbR9N2CLI32l5zzl_7qnHnS6h92rQ9uLu-LSP-GVG_fVySP0MAaa-Cis5THac80TZCDt9FrBfTtQteL-dtGt2kWP2xp3S_fD02_cYt1UeHhBwKGIErcN1rgKqLz5MHmhL9slHnG0Nw5XkcbzKTo7-Xh2PEtjl4XU8qJYpZwza4lxxEkrSy0prXJLq6zyVPDaZEXFK6YJc2VWQ_hgYIwIA3EOqSA4IuwZ2m_axr1AWDMDCYoBdUiXC8Jkzp2spcvKWsiS0wTJcUuVjQzkvhHGlRqhZpdqUx2-RaZUhClQR4LYWrYLPBw7Sb0fNafGSlPwjQqui52ki7ukXR-Pea8y1VNF1F-mmKAPa8kta975z5MtM1svmWZC-lrkBL0Z7U6BP_CPPLpx7XWvRJFTzzecoOfBCn9vl-ScFxLUUGzZ53qCZxrfHmnmFwPjOC0gr83Zy_9c1iG6Hx7jPNr5FdpfLa_da4jpVmaC7r37mU3iyf0F-9JQ6g |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqcgAJIRCv8Gh94BrWie0kFuKAKqoF2l5YpN4sv0K36ibRZovUC7-dseMsu1CklbjGHkWeGY9n5M_fIPRGkdrkzNCUiqpIWWVUWlFl0oILoiuoD1ygazo9K6bf2Odzfr6Hjsa3MB5WGWP_ENNDtI5fJlGbk24-n3wlPpWgjJLQ99Jzgt5hsH397nz7cxPnMVBRwuzUTx-ZRwPIC4x00fZdQBZH8krPeMr_dUrd71QPuquHphe3ZaV_gis3Tqvjh-hBTDPxh2Elj9Ceax4jDUWntwnu20DUivubRbdqFz1ua9wt3XdPvnGDVWNxuD_AwxNK3DZYYTtg8uZh8kJdtks8omh_OGwjiecTNDv-ODuaprHHQmp4Wa5SzqkxRDvihBGVEnlumcltZj0RvNJZabmlilBXZTUkDxrGSKEhyyEWUiNCn6L9pm3cc4QV1VCeaDCGcKwgVDDuRC1cVtWFqHieIDGqVJrIP-7bYFzJEWh2KTfN4RtkCkmoBHMkiK5lu4GFYyepd6Pl5PjOFCKjhMNiJ-nyNmnXx03ey0z2uSTyL0dM0Pu15JYv7_zngy03Wy85zwrhXyIn6HD0OwnRwF_xqMa1170sSpZ7tuEEPRu88Le6BOe8FGCGcss_1xM8z_j2SDO_CHzjeQlVLaMv_nNZh-judHZ6Ik8-nX15ie4N13Ie9_wK7a-W1-41ZHcrfRB27y_RbFGu |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Typical+somatic+symptoms+of+pregnancy+and+their+impact+on+a+diagnosis+of+major+depressive+disorder&rft.jtitle=General+hospital+psychiatry&rft.au=Yonkers%2C+Kimberly+Ann&rft.au=Smith%2C+Megan+V.&rft.au=Gotman%2C+Nathan&rft.au=Belanger%2C+Kathleen&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0163-8343&rft.eissn=1873-7714&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.genhosppsych.2009.03.005&rft.externalDocID=S0163834309000504 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01638343%2FS0163834309X00046%2Fcov150h.gif |