Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder

We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeneral hospital psychiatry Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 327 - 333
Main Authors Yonkers, Kimberly Ann, Smith, Megan V., Gotman, Nathan, Belanger, Kathleen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.07.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.
AbstractList Abstract Objective We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Method Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Results Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Conclusions Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.
We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26–30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4–12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29–6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. “Appetite increase,” “oversleeping” and “increase in energy” (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.
We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds. Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value. Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.
We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVEWe sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.METHODEight hundred thirty-eight subjects completed a Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) before 17 weeks of pregnancy, at 26-30 weeks of pregnancy and at 4-12 weeks postpartum. Subjects responded to a checklist of MDD symptoms regardless of stem question endorsement. We compared rates of symptom expression by response (Y/N) to stem questions, and trimester, using logit analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal EPDS thresholds.Most symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.RESULTSMost symptoms from the DSM-IV checklist were endorsed significantly more often in the first compared to later trimesters (odds ratios ranged from 1.39 to 14.16 for the first vs. later trimesters), independent of response to depression stem questions or medication treatment. Despite this, stem-positive and stem-negative groups differed significantly for 10 out of 13 symptoms (odds ratios, 2.29-6.89), independent of trimester. The EPDS had an optimal cutoff of 10 and showed acceptable predictive value.Pregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.CONCLUSIONSPregnant women commonly experience somatic and other symptoms in this first trimester, but depressed women still differ from those who are not depressed. "Appetite increase," "oversleeping" and "increase in energy" (e.g., agitation) were uninformative with regard to an MDD diagnosis.
Author Gotman, Nathan
Smith, Megan V.
Yonkers, Kimberly Ann
Belanger, Kathleen
AuthorAffiliation 3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Medicine
1 Department of Psychiatry, at the Yale School of Medicine
2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the Yale School of Medicine
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Psychiatry, at the Yale School of Medicine
– name: 2 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at the Yale School of Medicine
– name: 3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Medicine
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kimberly Ann
  surname: Yonkers
  fullname: Yonkers, Kimberly Ann
  email: kimberly.yonkers@yale.edu
  organization: Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Megan V.
  surname: Smith
  fullname: Smith, Megan V.
  organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nathan
  surname: Gotman
  fullname: Gotman, Nathan
  organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kathleen
  surname: Belanger
  fullname: Belanger, Kathleen
  organization: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21699956$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19555792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkk2P0zAQhi20iO0u_AVkIcGtxR9xEnNYLSyf0koc6N1y7GnrktjBTivl3-PQUi0rIfXkwzzzeDTvXKELHzwg9IqSBSW0fLtdrMFvQur7NJrNghEiF4QvCBFP0IzWFZ9XFS0u0CzDfF7zgl-iq5S2JBNM8GfokkohRCXZDDXLsXdGtziFTg_O4DR2_RC6hMMK9xHWXnszYu0tHjbgInZdr82Ag8caW6fXPiT3B-70NkRsITel5PaQqylEC_E5errSbYIXx_caLT9_Wt59nd9___Lt7v393IiqGuZCcGNIAwSkkbWWjNnCMEttzZjUDa2ssFwTDjVd1VQ2uUbKhteSWMoE4dfo5qDtd00H1oAfom5VH12n46iCdurfincbtQ57xaqirgqeBW-Oghh-7SANqnPJQNtqD2GXVFkVjJRiAl8-_On0xd-tZuD1EdAp73YV8w5dOnGMllJKUWbu9sCZGFKKsFLGDTmFMA3oWkWJmgJXW_UwcDUFrghXOc6sePdIcZrmnOaPh2bIsewdRJWMA2_AughmUDa48zQ3jzSmdX66qp8wQtqGXfQ5eEVVYoqoH9NZTldJ5HSRpMiCD_8XnDvFb3jA_Tg
CODEN GHPSDB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2011_602143
crossref_primary_10_1177_0004867415617657
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_020_02885_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_0167482X_2020_1770221
crossref_primary_10_1142_S179398442140002X
crossref_primary_10_2196_53744
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0191782
crossref_primary_10_2196_53508
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpag_2013_09_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yfrne_2020_100854
crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16178
crossref_primary_10_1002_wps_20778
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_05_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2014_02_012
crossref_primary_10_1080_03630242_2012_674090
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2017_08_007
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0191675
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2015_11_014
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_021_03793_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2018_03_011
crossref_primary_10_4081_rp_2021_352
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2020_8862
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00737_016_0685_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2021_07_049
crossref_primary_10_1080_15402002_2020_1772265
crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_12308
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0270873
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2013_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1080_02646838_2018_1448373
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_022_03418_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2024_04_014
crossref_primary_10_1002_j_1556_6678_2011_tb00102_x
crossref_primary_10_2196_12574
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11060907
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2014_03_028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2010_04_011
crossref_primary_10_1097_YCO_0000000000000885
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2015_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbih_2024_100885
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2019_030365
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_14734
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_13685
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18136789
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_01468
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2016_08_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nurpra_2016_07_023
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_059033
crossref_primary_10_1517_14740338_2012_670419
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2011_05_004
Cites_doi 10.1126/science.3287615
10.1002/depr.3050020606
10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100053010
10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1
10.1016/S0163-8343(01)00129-3
10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060928
10.1007/s00737-002-0156-0
10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01660.x
10.1007/s00737-006-0152-x
10.1097/01.nmd.0000248970.50265.34
10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00187-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
2009 INIST-CNRS
2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2009
Copyright_xml – notice: 2009 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: 2009 INIST-CNRS
– notice: 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2009
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1873-7714
EndPage 333
ExternalDocumentID PMC2748743
19555792
21699956
10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005
S0163834309000504
1_s2_0_S0163834309000504
Genre Validation Study
Comparative Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United States
North America
America
Massachusetts
Connecticut
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Connecticut
– name: Massachusetts
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 HD045735
– fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: 5 R01HD045735
– fundername: NIDA NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DA019135
– fundername: NIMH NIH HHS
  grantid: T32 MH014235
– fundername: NIMH NIH HHS
  grantid: T32MH014235
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29H
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGKA
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HEG
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M29
M39
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OH0
OU-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WOW
WUQ
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-553cc0be0e9c98a922d4c2d1d8229ab17d5d3a03e81f819bc2d06b3890d12503
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0163-8343
1873-7714
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:23:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:40:33 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:03:53 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:36:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:39:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:33 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:21:04 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:05 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:53 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Pregnancy
Women
Mood disorders/unipolar
Obstetrics and gynecology
Social environment
Human
Mood disorder
Mental health
Depression
Maternal diseases
Obstetrics
Symptomatology
Follow up study
Diagnosis
Woman
Public health
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c577t-553cc0be0e9c98a922d4c2d1d8229ab17d5d3a03e81f819bc2d06b3890d12503
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
In the past year, Dr. Yonkers received research grants from Eli Lilly and study drug from Pfizer for an NIMH trial. Drs. Belanger and Smith and Mr. Gotman have nothing to disclose.
PMID 19555792
PQID 67420653
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2748743
proquest_miscellaneous_67420653
pubmed_primary_19555792
pascalfrancis_primary_21699956
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0163834309000504
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_genhosppsych_2009_03_005
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle General hospital psychiatry
PublicationTitleAlternate Gen Hosp Psychiatry
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Ross, Evans, Sellers, Romach (bib6) 2003; 6
Zimmerman, Chelminski, McGlinchey, Young (bib5) 2006; 194
Sugawara, Sakamoto, Kitamura, Toda, Shima (bib3) 1999; 54
Cox, Holden, Sagovsky (bib2) 1987; 150
Keller, Lavori, Mueller, Endicott, Coryell, Hirschfeld (bib15) 1992; 49
Cox, Holden (bib13) 1994
Kelly, Russo, Katon (bib7) 2001; 23
Milgrom, Ericksen, Negri, Gemmill (bib8) 2005; 39
Eberhard-Gran, Eskild, Tambs, Opjordsmoen, Ove Samuelsen (bib12) 2001; 104
Klein, Essex (bib1) 1995; 2
Matthey, Henshaw, Elliott, Barnett (bib9) 2006; 9
Andrews, Slade, Sunderland, Anderson (bib4) 2007; 164
Wittchen (bib11) 1994; 28
Swets (bib14) 1988; 240
WHO (bib10) 1997
Andrews (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib4) 2007; 164
Cox (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib13) 1994
Swets (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib14) 1988; 240
WHO (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib10) 1997
Matthey (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib9) 2006; 9
Milgrom (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib8) 2005; 39
Sugawara (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib3) 1999; 54
Klein (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib1) 1995; 2
Wittchen (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib11) 1994; 28
Zimmerman (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib5) 2006; 194
Eberhard-Gran (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib12) 2001; 104
Kelly (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib7) 2001; 23
Keller (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib15) 1992; 49
Cox (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib2) 1987; 150
Ross (10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib6) 2003; 6
References_xml – volume: 9
  start-page: 309
  year: 2006
  end-page: 315
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice
  publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health
– volume: 54
  start-page: 161
  year: 1999
  end-page: 169
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Structure of depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the postpartum period
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
– volume: 23
  start-page: 107
  year: 2001
  end-page: 113
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited?
  publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry
– volume: 164
  start-page: 1784
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1785
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Issues for
  publication-title: Am J Psychiatry
– volume: 240
  start-page: 1285
  year: 1988
  end-page: 1293
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 2
  start-page: 308
  year: 1995
  end-page: 314
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Pregnant or depressed? The effect of overlap between symptoms of depression and somatic complaints of pregnancy on rates of major depression in the second trimester
  publication-title: Depression
– volume: 6
  start-page: 59
  year: 2003
  end-page: 64
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 2: assessment of somatic symptoms using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
  publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health
– year: 1994
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Perinatal psychiatry. Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
– volume: 194
  start-page: 893
  year: 2006
  end-page: 897
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Diagnosing major depressive disorder: can the utility of the
  publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis
– year: 1997
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI, Version 2.1). Version 2.1 ed
– volume: 104
  start-page: 243
  year: 2001
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
  publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand
– volume: 28
  start-page: 57
  year: 1994
  end-page: 84
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review
  publication-title: J Psychiatr Res
– volume: 49
  start-page: 809
  year: 1992
  end-page: 816
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects
  publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry
– volume: 150
  start-page: 782
  year: 1987
  end-page: 786
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
  publication-title: Br J Psychiatry
– volume: 39
  start-page: 833
  year: 2005
  end-page: 839
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample
  publication-title: Aust N Z J Psychiatry
– volume: 240
  start-page: 1285
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib14
  article-title: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.3287615
– volume: 2
  start-page: 308
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib1
  article-title: Pregnant or depressed? The effect of overlap between symptoms of depression and somatic complaints of pregnancy on rates of major depression in the second trimester
  publication-title: Depression
  doi: 10.1002/depr.3050020606
– year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib10
– volume: 49
  start-page: 809
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib15
  article-title: Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. A 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects
  publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100053010
– volume: 104
  start-page: 243
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib12
  article-title: Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
  publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
– volume: 150
  start-page: 782
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib2
  article-title: Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
  publication-title: Br J Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
– volume: 28
  start-page: 57
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib11
  article-title: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review
  publication-title: J Psychiatr Res
  doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(94)90036-1
– volume: 23
  start-page: 107
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib7
  article-title: Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited?
  publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1016/S0163-8343(01)00129-3
– volume: 164
  start-page: 1784
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib4
  article-title: Issues for DSM-V: simplifying DSM-IV to enhance utility: the case of major depressive disorder
  publication-title: Am J Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060928
– volume: 6
  start-page: 59
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib6
  article-title: Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 2: assessment of somatic symptoms using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
  publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health
  doi: 10.1007/s00737-002-0156-0
– volume: 39
  start-page: 833
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib8
  article-title: Screening for postnatal depression in routine primary care: properties of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in an Australian sample
  publication-title: Aust N Z J Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01660.x
– volume: 9
  start-page: 309
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib9
  article-title: Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice
  publication-title: Arch Women's Ment Health
  doi: 10.1007/s00737-006-0152-x
– year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib13
– volume: 194
  start-page: 893
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib5
  article-title: Diagnosing major depressive disorder: can the utility of the DSM-IV symptom criteria be improved?
  publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis
  doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000248970.50265.34
– volume: 54
  start-page: 161
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005_bib3
  article-title: Structure of depressive symptoms in pregnancy and the postpartum period
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00187-6
SSID ssj0005253
Score 2.1403346
Snippet We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Eight hundred thirty-eight subjects...
Abstract Objective We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Method Eight...
We sought to determine whether trimester of pregnancy influences the ability to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD).OBJECTIVEWe sought to determine...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 327
SubjectTerms Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Algorithms
Analysis of Variance
Biological and medical sciences
Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
Connecticut
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
Depressive Disorder, Major - drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Interview, Psychological - standards
Logistic Models
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - standards
Massachusetts
Medical sciences
Mood disorders
Mood disorders/unipolar
Obstetrics and gynecology
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - diagnosis
Pregnancy Complications - drug therapy
Pregnancy Trimesters - physiology
Pregnancy Trimesters - psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
ROC Curve
Women
Title Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0163834309000504
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0163834309000504
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.005
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19555792
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67420653
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2748743
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Nb9QwELVKe0FCCMRXKCw-cA3r2LETC3GoKqoFRC8UqTfLdhy6VTeJNttKvfDbGcfOsgtFWolr7FFkz3g8I795g9BbTWpLc8tSJkuR5qXVacm0TQWXxJSQH7iBrunrqZh9zz-f8_M9dDzWwnhYZfT9wacP3jp-mcbdnHbz-fQb8aEEyxkZ-l56TtADyqQA0z44-vRldrqB9AhklDA_9QIj9-gA8wI1XbR9N2CLI32l5zzl_7qnHnS6h92rQ9uLu-LSP-GVG_fVySP0MAaa-Cis5THac80TZCDt9FrBfTtQteL-dtGt2kWP2xp3S_fD02_cYt1UeHhBwKGIErcN1rgKqLz5MHmhL9slHnG0Nw5XkcbzKTo7-Xh2PEtjl4XU8qJYpZwza4lxxEkrSy0prXJLq6zyVPDaZEXFK6YJc2VWQ_hgYIwIA3EOqSA4IuwZ2m_axr1AWDMDCYoBdUiXC8Jkzp2spcvKWsiS0wTJcUuVjQzkvhHGlRqhZpdqUx2-RaZUhClQR4LYWrYLPBw7Sb0fNafGSlPwjQqui52ki7ukXR-Pea8y1VNF1F-mmKAPa8kta975z5MtM1svmWZC-lrkBL0Z7U6BP_CPPLpx7XWvRJFTzzecoOfBCn9vl-ScFxLUUGzZ53qCZxrfHmnmFwPjOC0gr83Zy_9c1iG6Hx7jPNr5FdpfLa_da4jpVmaC7r37mU3iyf0F-9JQ6g
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaqcgAJIRCv8Gh94BrWie0kFuKAKqoF2l5YpN4sv0K36ibRZovUC7-dseMsu1CklbjGHkWeGY9n5M_fIPRGkdrkzNCUiqpIWWVUWlFl0oILoiuoD1ygazo9K6bf2Odzfr6Hjsa3MB5WGWP_ENNDtI5fJlGbk24-n3wlPpWgjJLQ99Jzgt5hsH397nz7cxPnMVBRwuzUTx-ZRwPIC4x00fZdQBZH8krPeMr_dUrd71QPuquHphe3ZaV_gis3Tqvjh-hBTDPxh2Elj9Ceax4jDUWntwnu20DUivubRbdqFz1ua9wt3XdPvnGDVWNxuD_AwxNK3DZYYTtg8uZh8kJdtks8omh_OGwjiecTNDv-ODuaprHHQmp4Wa5SzqkxRDvihBGVEnlumcltZj0RvNJZabmlilBXZTUkDxrGSKEhyyEWUiNCn6L9pm3cc4QV1VCeaDCGcKwgVDDuRC1cVtWFqHieIDGqVJrIP-7bYFzJEWh2KTfN4RtkCkmoBHMkiK5lu4GFYyepd6Pl5PjOFCKjhMNiJ-nyNmnXx03ey0z2uSTyL0dM0Pu15JYv7_zngy03Wy85zwrhXyIn6HD0OwnRwF_xqMa1170sSpZ7tuEEPRu88Le6BOe8FGCGcss_1xM8z_j2SDO_CHzjeQlVLaMv_nNZh-judHZ6Ik8-nX15ie4N13Ie9_wK7a-W1-41ZHcrfRB27y_RbFGu
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Typical+somatic+symptoms+of+pregnancy+and+their+impact+on+a+diagnosis+of+major+depressive+disorder&rft.jtitle=General+hospital+psychiatry&rft.au=Yonkers%2C+Kimberly+Ann&rft.au=Smith%2C+Megan+V.&rft.au=Gotman%2C+Nathan&rft.au=Belanger%2C+Kathleen&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0163-8343&rft.eissn=1873-7714&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.genhosppsych.2009.03.005&rft.externalDocID=S0163834309000504
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F01638343%2FS0163834309X00046%2Fcov150h.gif