Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining
•The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training.•Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data.•Further research is required to determine the benefits of real time feedback using the Kinect. Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the re...
Saved in:
Published in | Gait & posture Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 1064 - 1066 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier B.V
01.09.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training.•Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data.•Further research is required to determine the benefits of real time feedback using the Kinect.
Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems.Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems. Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinectac (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10ADG. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2ADG) magnitude (mean error = 3.2 A- 2.2ADG). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P < 0.001) improved this error to 1.7 A- 1.5ADG and 0.8 A- 0.8ADG respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems. Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems. •The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training.•Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data.•Further research is required to determine the benefits of real time feedback using the Kinect. Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the model, the aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of kinematic data recorded using a marker-based 3D motion analysis (3DMA) system and a low-cost alternative, the Microsoft Kinect™ (Kinect), during a gait retraining session. Twenty healthy adults were trained to modify their gait to obtain a lateral trunk lean angle of 10°. Real-time biofeedback of the lateral trunk lean angle was provided on a computer screen in front of the subject using data extracted from the Kinect skeletal tracking algorithm. Marker coordinate data were concurrently recorded using the 3DMA system, and the similarity and equivalency of the trunk lean angle data from each system were compared. The lateral trunk lean angle data obtained from the Kinect system without any form of calibration resulted in errors of a high (>2°) magnitude (mean error=3.2±2.2°). Performing global and individualized calibration significantly (P<0.001) improved this error to 1.7±1.5° and 0.8±0.8° respectively. With the addition of a simple calibration the anatomical position coordinates of the Kinect can be used to create a real-time biofeedback system for gait retraining. Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to laboratory-based gait retraining systems. Highlights • The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training. • Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data. • Further research is required to determine the benefits of real time feedback using the Kinect. |
Author | Hunt, Michael A. Pua, Yong-Hao Bryant, Adam L. Clark, Ross A. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ross A. surname: Clark fullname: Clark, Ross A. email: ross.clark@acu.edu.au organization: School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Yong-Hao surname: Pua fullname: Pua, Yong-Hao organization: Department of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore – sequence: 3 givenname: Adam L. surname: Bryant fullname: Bryant, Adam L. organization: Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Michael A. surname: Hunt fullname: Hunt, Michael A. organization: Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23643880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUk1rGzEUFCWlcdL-haBjL3afpF1ZglJaQr9oSg_9uAqt9m0qey25kjbgf18tTnrIoQk8IQlmhmHmnZGTEAMScsFgxYDJV5vVtfVlH3NZcWBiBXW4fkIWTK31knOmT8gCtJRLKSQ_JWc5bwCgEYo_I6dcyPpSsCD2lx1978uBxoGW30i_epdijkOhX3xAV-gQE92neFNR4ZqOtmCyIy1pCls6og10QOw767a0n9IMmY3RhCVZH-r_OXk62DHji9v7nPz88P7H5afl1bePny_fXS1du16XpUDZqrYH6bpe8bbTUgneDVpagcoKq4SF6loPWis1tF09zaAF71vGwAKIc_LyqFvN_pkwF7Pz2eE42oBxyoa1AGspm-YR0KYRQrdKNBV6cQuduh32Zp_8zqaDuUuwAuQRMMeWEw7_IAzMXJXZmLuqzFyVgTpcV-Lre0Tniy0-hjm58WH62yMda6Y3HpPJzmNw2PtUazN99A9LvLkn4cZambPjFg-YN3FKoTZmmMncgPk-r9O8TUwAMKWa_ws8xsFfsFLeBA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00149_2021 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_015_0102_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23229263 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2019_03_020 crossref_primary_10_3390_s18072216 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_riai_2016_07_007 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_018_2488_4 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219519416500378 crossref_primary_10_3390_s16111965 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2017_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2014_08_047 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_29_1940 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_017_0883_9 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_964576 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2013_11_031 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4032878 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_020_04814_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2018_11_029 crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2014_2328340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2016_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2019_06_016 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2017_2759801 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_018_0444_1 crossref_primary_10_2352_J_Percept_Imaging_2020_3_1_010402 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_186780 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_016_0764_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2017_06_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22197542 crossref_primary_10_1556_606_2021_00352 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13670_020_00349_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2021_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2015_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2018_04_010 crossref_primary_10_3414_ME14_01_0120 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_018_0419_2 crossref_primary_10_3109_17483107_2015_1080767 crossref_primary_10_1080_02533839_2022_2126404 crossref_primary_10_1080_10447318_2017_1342943 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_846514 crossref_primary_10_3390_s20123529 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_2364 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_smhl_2017_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2016_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apergo_2015_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medntd_2021_100068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2016_04_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17155620 crossref_primary_10_3414_ME13_01_0109 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9081076 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0128809 crossref_primary_10_3233_VES_170602 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593985_2016_1265620 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2015_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2017_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_021_00959_4 crossref_primary_10_1587_transinf_2015EDP7089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2015_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1089_g4h_2017_0137 crossref_primary_10_1097_MRR_0000000000000237 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci10020094 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJHISI_2019010103 crossref_primary_10_1109_TASE_2020_3010415 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0204052 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00500_021_05649_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2019_04_019 crossref_primary_10_1155_2019_7175240 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph191610032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2015_12_034 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2017_00708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2019_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1049_iet_cvi_2018_5274 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4031060 crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzz097 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2020_109929 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0215995 crossref_primary_10_3414_ME14_11_0001 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218001415550083 crossref_primary_10_3390_s140203362 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23136217 crossref_primary_10_1682_JRRD_2013_12_0263 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2015_05_002 crossref_primary_10_3138_ptc_2020_0051 crossref_primary_10_4018_IJITN_2020010102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e26060 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_3032202 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2014_11_048 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11044_017_9573_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2015_01_028 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.027 10.3233/AIS-2011-0124 10.1089/neu.2010.1649 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033 10.1109/TBME.2005.846728 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.001 10.1198/000313001753272213 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Elsevier B.V. Elsevier B.V. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 Elsevier B.V. – notice: Elsevier B.V. – notice: Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TS |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1879-2219 |
EndPage | 1066 |
ExternalDocumentID | 23643880 10_1016_j_gaitpost_2013_03_029 S0966636213001884 1_s2_0_S0966636213001884 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29H 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEE HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M29 M31 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OF0 OR. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UPT UV1 WH7 WUQ YRY Z5R ~G- AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW RIG YCJ AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c577t-3e6585d06cbd825b96832bf96a3e8a3a83a03649f9988f5b8f54f932d5110a003 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0966-6362 1879-2219 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 21 09:51:07 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:51:45 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:21 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:47:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:43 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:33:12 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:01 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 18:56:11 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Knee adduction moment Video game Biofeedback Gait training Osteoarthritis |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c577t-3e6585d06cbd825b96832bf96a3e8a3a83a03649f9988f5b8f54f932d5110a003 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 23643880 |
PQID | 1443395834 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 3 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1500766440 proquest_miscellaneous_1443395834 pubmed_primary_23643880 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2013_03_029 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2013_03_029 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2013_03_029 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0966636213001884 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2013_03_029 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2013 text: 2013-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Gait & posture |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gait Posture |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier B.V |
References | Hunt, Simic, Hinman, Bennell, Wrigley (bib0005) 2011; 44 Clark, Pua, Fortin, Ritchie, Webster, Denehy (bib0015) 2012; 36 Schuirmann (bib0035) 1981; 37 Barker, Rolka, Rolka, Brown (bib0040) 2001; 55 Williams, Clark, Schache, Fini, Moore, Morris (bib0010) 2011; 28 Stone, Skubic (bib0020) 2011; 3 Cappello, Stagni, Fantozzi, Leardini (bib0030) 2005; 52 Mündermann, Asay, Mündermann, Andriacchi (bib0025) 2008; 41 Stone (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0020) 2011; 3 Schuirmann (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0035) 1981; 37 Mündermann (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0025) 2008; 41 Clark (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0015) 2012; 36 Williams (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0010) 2011; 28 Cappello (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0030) 2005; 52 Hunt (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0005) 2011; 44 Barker (10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0040) 2001; 55 |
References_xml | – volume: 36 start-page: 372 year: 2012 end-page: 377 ident: bib0015 article-title: Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control publication-title: Gait and Posture – volume: 52 start-page: 992 year: 2005 end-page: 998 ident: bib0030 article-title: Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering – volume: 55 start-page: 279 year: 2001 end-page: 287 ident: bib0040 article-title: Equivalence testing for binomial random variables: which test to use? publication-title: American Statistician – volume: 44 start-page: 943 year: 2011 end-page: 947 ident: bib0005 article-title: Feasibility of a gait retraining strategy for reducing knee joint loading: increased trunk lean guided by real-time biofeedback publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics – volume: 28 start-page: 281 year: 2011 end-page: 287 ident: bib0010 article-title: Training conditions influence walking kinematics and self-selected walking speed in patients with neurological impairments publication-title: Journal of Neurotrauma – volume: 3 start-page: 349 year: 2011 end-page: 361 ident: bib0020 article-title: Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment publication-title: Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments – volume: 41 start-page: 165 year: 2008 end-page: 170 ident: bib0025 article-title: Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics – volume: 37 start-page: 617 year: 1981 ident: bib0035 article-title: On hypothesis testing to determine if the mean of a normal distribution is contained in a known interval publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 44 start-page: 943 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0005 article-title: Feasibility of a gait retraining strategy for reducing knee joint loading: increased trunk lean guided by real-time biofeedback publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.027 – volume: 3 start-page: 349 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0020 article-title: Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment publication-title: Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments doi: 10.3233/AIS-2011-0124 – volume: 28 start-page: 281 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0010 article-title: Training conditions influence walking kinematics and self-selected walking speed in patients with neurological impairments publication-title: Journal of Neurotrauma doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1649 – volume: 36 start-page: 372 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0015 article-title: Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control publication-title: Gait and Posture doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.033 – volume: 52 start-page: 992 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0030 article-title: Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.846728 – volume: 41 start-page: 165 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0025 article-title: Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics publication-title: Journal of Biomechanics doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.001 – volume: 37 start-page: 617 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0035 article-title: On hypothesis testing to determine if the mean of a normal distribution is contained in a known interval publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 55 start-page: 279 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029_bib0040 article-title: Equivalence testing for binomial random variables: which test to use? publication-title: American Statistician doi: 10.1198/000313001753272213 |
SSID | ssj0004382 |
Score | 2.427702 |
Snippet | •The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training.•Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data.•Further... Highlights • The Microsoft Kinect could be used for rehabilitation training. • Using simple calibration techniques the Kinect provides accurate gait lean data.... Gait retraining programs are prescribed to assist in the rehabilitation process of many clinical conditions. Using lateral trunk lean modification as the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1064 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Analysis Biofeedback Biofeedback, Psychology - instrumentation Biomechanical Phenomena Female Gait Gait training Humans Knee adduction moment Male Orthopedics Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis, Knee - rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Therapy, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Therapy, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Torso - physiopathology Video game Video Games - statistics & numerical data Young Adult |
Title | Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0966636213001884 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0966636213001884 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23643880 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1443395834 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1500766440 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB9KBfFFtK16fpQtSN_Sy2U_kjweh-W0vSLWSt-W3WRXrj1zR5M--OLf7swmORWtLQoJgbCbbGZmZ36b-ViA17KwuSuFigqZyEiUSR5Za8uIezWy0khpCkpOnp2o6Zl4dy7PN2DS58JQWGWn-1udHrR1d2fYUXO4ms-Hpwi-0VyqhBwyoyyjmqBCpCTlB99-hHmQoyvU21MqotY_ZQlfHHw282a1rCmmcsRDsdMANf9ooG4CoMEQHT6Chx2CZON2kI9hw1VbsD2ucPX85SvbZyGmM_ws34L7s851vg3mEyLuEjE3W3qGqI_NKBSvRi3MjrBB0TCEr6xNzENzxhaGcpMXrLm6ri7ZwpmKebR01hSXrM1tZPRd7Mr1u0zswNnhm4-TadTtr4CMSdMm4g7hhyxjVdgSF4o2Vzi9rc-V4S4z3GTckJcy97gky7y0eAqPeK9EkBYbVAdPYLNaVu4ZMFQVLkmMT32cCSSm9al1KcfHOqoWZAYge6Lqois-TqNb6D7K7EL3zNDEDB3jkeQDGK77rdryG7f2SHue6T65FNWhRgvxbz1d3c3qWo90nehY_yZ5A8jXPX8R3ju9da8XLI0zm9w1pnLLa3ybEJznMuPiL20kuVIR08YDeNpK5ZpOtDUAlfp5_h-jewEPkrD_BwXVvYRNlDn3ClFYY3fDNNuFe-PJh-P3dH17ND35Dq4bNBU |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-NToK9INiAdcAwEuItNI3tfDxWE1NH176wob1ZdmKjbl1aLdnD_vvdJU5h4mtiUvIS-WLHPt_9nPsC-CBzk9lCxEEuIxmIIsoCY0wRcBcPjdRS6pyCk6ezeHwqvpzJsw046GJhyK3Sy_5WpjfS2j8Z-NkcrObzwVcE36gu44gMMsM0FY9gk7JTyR5sjo4m49mP8Eje1Iyi9gER_BQofP7pu57Xq2VFbpVD3uQ7bdDmb3XUnzBoo4sOn8FTDyLZqB3nc9iw5TbsjEo8QF_esI-scets_pdvw-Opt57vgP6GoLtA2M2WjiHwY1PyxqtQELMJNshrhgiWtbF5qNHYQlN48oLVV9flBVtYXTKHys7o_IK14Y2Mvotd2a7QxAs4Pfx8cjAOfIkFXJskqQNuEYHIIoxzU-BZ0WQx7nDjslhzm2quU67JUJk5PJWlThq8hUPIVyBOCzVKhJfQK5el3QWG0sJGkXaJC1OBk2lcYmzC8bWWEgbpPshuUlXu84_T6BaqczQ7V91iKFoMFeIVZX0YrOlWbQaOf1Ik3ZqpLr4UJaJCJfF_lLbyG7tSQ1VFKlS_MF8fsjXlHf69V6_vO8ZSuLnJYqNLu7zG3oTgPJMpF39pI8mairA27MOrlivX80TVASjbz94DRvcOnoxPpsfq-Gg2eQ1bUVMOhHzs3kAP-c--RVBWm32_6W4BeFc1MQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity+of+the+Microsoft+Kinect+for+providing+lateral+trunk+lean+feedback+during+gait+retraining&rft.jtitle=Gait+%26+posture&rft.au=Clark%2C+Ross&rft.au=Pua%2C+Yong-Hao&rft.au=Bryant%2C+Adam&rft.au=Hunt%2C+Michael&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1064&rft.epage=1066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.gaitpost.2013.03.029&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F09666362%2FS0966636213X00098%2Fcov150h.gif |