Two-Year Results of the 17-mm Avalus Aortic Valve in the PERIGON Japan Trial

Background:The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.Methods and Results:The primary endpoin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Journal Vol. 85; no. 7; pp. 1035 - 1041
Main Authors Yaku, Hitoshi, Fujita, Tomoyuki, Nakajima, Hiroyuki, Fukumura, Yoshiaki, Gearhart, Elizabeth, Okita, Yutaka, Yamanaka, Katsuhiro, Yamaguchi, Atsushi, Komiya, Tatsuhiko, Murakami, Hirohisa, Zaikokuji, Kenta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 25.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background:The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.Methods and Results:The primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm2/m2or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm2/m2, with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm2/m2. As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years.Conclusions:The PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.
AbstractList The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.BACKGROUNDThe PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.The primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm2/m2or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm2/m2, with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm2/m2. As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years.METHODS AND RESULTSThe primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm2/m2or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm2/m2, with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm2/m2. As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years.The PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.CONCLUSIONSThe PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.
Background:The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.Methods and Results:The primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm2/m2or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm2/m2, with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm2/m2. As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years.Conclusions:The PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.
The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. The primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm /m or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm /m , with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm /m . As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years. The PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.
Author Murakami, Hirohisa
Yaku, Hitoshi
Yamaguchi, Atsushi
Gearhart, Elizabeth
Yamanaka, Katsuhiro
Fujita, Tomoyuki
Komiya, Tatsuhiko
Zaikokuji, Kenta
Okita, Yutaka
Nakajima, Hiroyuki
Fukumura, Yoshiaki
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Yaku, Hitoshi
  organization: Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Fujita, Tomoyuki
  organization: National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Nakajima, Hiroyuki
  organization: Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Fukumura, Yoshiaki
  organization: Tokushima Red Cross Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Gearhart, Elizabeth
  organization: Medtronic
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Okita, Yutaka
  organization: Takatsuki General Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Yamanaka, Katsuhiro
  organization: Kobe University Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Yamaguchi, Atsushi
  organization: Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Komiya, Tatsuhiko
  organization: Kurashiki Central Hospital
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Murakami, Hirohisa
  organization: Hyogo Brain and Heart Center
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Zaikokuji, Kenta
  organization: Sakakibara Heart Institute
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpFkMlOwzAQQC0EYincOSEfuRi8xLF9rCoKrSpAqCBxsqaOA6myFDsB8fekC3AZj6z35vBO0H7d1B6hc0avGJfi2hXBLa9GU8IpYZQne-iYiUSRRHO6v9lTYnQijtBJjEtKuaHSHKIjIZRKKVPHaDb_asirh4CffOzKNuImx-27x0yRqsLDTyi7iIdNaAuHX6D89LioN8DjzdPk9uEeT2EFNZ6HAspTdJBDGf3Z7h2g5_HNfHRHZg-3k9FwRpxUsiXaKa850EyDYZJDv6VCsUQLIYEbkWi2WCjpwOXARaYMsIzlRps0M0aKXAzQ5fbuKjQfnY-trYrofFlC7ZsuWi5pKhmTmvfoxQ7tFpXP7CoUFYRv-1ugB-gWcKGJMfj8D2HUriPbTWQ7mlref_SRe2W8VZaxhTf_J8A6Uul3gpZWrce_-A-8Q7C-Fj8lD4X5
Cites_doi 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.059
10.1055/s-0033-1363498
10.1177/0218492311419449
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001681
10.15420/icr.2018.22.1
10.1007/s00392-014-0713-3
10.1093/ejcts/ezx066
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.031
10.1093/ejcts/ezw247
10.1093/icvts/ivv284
10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.05.001
10.1080/14779072.2018.1524295
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.171
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090
10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1068
10.1055/s-0035-1563669
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1024
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1347-4820
EndPage 1041
ExternalDocumentID 33776017
10_1253_circj_CJ_20_1024
article_circj_85_7_85_CJ_20_1024_article_char_en
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Japan
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Japan
GroupedDBID ---
.55
29B
2WC
53G
5GY
5RE
6J9
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
JSF
JSH
KQ8
OK1
OVT
P2P
RJT
RNS
RZJ
TR2
W2D
X7M
XSB
ZXP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-8c7e82a0d8a9152aa0d637148335a293481bb75cacfa23d79a1d1f9896d9953f3
ISSN 1346-9843
1347-4820
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 15:04:45 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:48:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:01:31 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:31:19 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Aortic stenosis
Bovine pericardial tissue valve
Surgical aortic valve
Aortic regurgitation
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c575t-8c7e82a0d8a9152aa0d637148335a293481bb75cacfa23d79a1d1f9896d9953f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/85/7/85_CJ-20-1024/_article/-char/en
PMID 33776017
PQID 2506511582
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2506511582
pubmed_primary_33776017
crossref_primary_10_1253_circj_CJ_20_1024
jstage_primary_article_circj_85_7_85_CJ_20_1024_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-06-25
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-06-25
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-06-25
  day: 25
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Circulation Journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Circ J
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher The Japanese Circulation Society
Publisher_xml – name: The Japanese Circulation Society
References 20. Overtchouk P, Modine T. Alternate access for TAVI: Stay clear of the chest. Interv Cardiol 2018; 13: 145–150.
11. Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM, O’Brien S, Thibault DP, DiScipio AW, et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106: 14–22.
3. Watanabe Y, Morice M, Kozuma K, Yamamoto M, Kawashima H, Yashima F, et al. Comparison of aortic annulus dimensions between Japanese and European patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation as determined by multi-detector computed tomography: Results from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimised transCathEter vAlvular interveNtion) registry and a European single-centre cohort. AsiaIntervention 2016; 2: 49–56.
5. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: e1–e142.
8. Yoshikawa K, Fukunaga S, Arinaga K, Hori H, Nakamura E, Ueda T, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude medical valve in Japanese patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1303–1308.
9. Sato M, Suenaga E, Koga S, Kawasaki H. Aortic valve replacement with smaller valve size. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2011; 19: 314–319.
15. Head SJ, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Gleason TG, et al. Computed tomography-based indexed aortic annulus size to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: e007396.
18. Stamou SC, Lin N, James T, Rothenberg M, Lovitz L, Faber C, et al. Alternative access versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians. J Invasive Cardiol 2019; 31: 171–175.
6. Minakata K, Tanaka S, Okawa Y, Shimamoto M, Kaneko T, Takahara Y, et al. Long-term outcome of the carpentier-edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in Japanese patients. Circ J 2014; 78: 882–889.
10. Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, Ruel M, Al-Atassi T, Dumont E, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. Circulation 2019; 139: 2685–2702.
13. Franzen SF, Huljebrant IE, Konstantinov IE, Nylander E, Olin CL. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with small aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5(Suppl 3): S284–S288.
16. Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, Kodali S, Thourani VH, Szeto WY, et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: Insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 701–711.
12. Hoffmann G, Ogbamicael SA, Jochens A, Frank D, Lutter G, Cremer J, et al. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: A retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 469–474.
4. Ohira S, Miyata H, Doi K, Motomura N, Takamoto S, Yaku H. Risk model of aortic valve replacement after cardiovascular surgery based on a National Japanese Database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51: 347–353.
7. Domoto S, Niinami H, Uwabe K, Koike H, Tabata M, Morita K, et al. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22: 19–25.
14. Watanabe Y, Hayashida K, Takayama M, Mitsudo K, Nanto S, Takanashi S, et al. First direct comparison of clinical outcomes between European and Asian cohorts in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The Massy study group vs. the PREVAIL JAPAN trial. J Cardiol 2015; 65: 112–116.
17. Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Yakubov SJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Kleiman NS, et al. Impact of annular size on outcomes after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105: 1129–1136.
19. Overtchouk P, Modine T. A comparison of alternative access routes for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2018; 16: 749–756.
23. Kitamura M, Satoh M, Hachida M, Endo M, Hashimoto A, Koyanagi H. Aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus with or without annular enlargement. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5(Suppl 3): S289–S293.
1. Klautz RJM, Kappetein AP, Lange R, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, Bapat V, et al. Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52: 425–431.
21. Geis NA, Chorianopoulos E, Kallenbach K, Andre F, Pleger ST, Karck M, et al. Feasibility of sheathless transfemoral aortic valve implantation in patients with small access vessel diameters. Clin Res Cardiol 2014; 103: 775–780.
2. Sabik JF 3rd, Rao V, Lange R, Kappetein AP, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, et al. One-year outcomes associated with a novel stented bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156: 1368–1377.e1365.
22. Okamoto Y, Yamamoto K, Sugimoto T, Yoshii S. Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement with aortic annular enlargement: A propensity analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64: 410–417.
11
22
12
23
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
10
21
References_xml – reference: 14. Watanabe Y, Hayashida K, Takayama M, Mitsudo K, Nanto S, Takanashi S, et al. First direct comparison of clinical outcomes between European and Asian cohorts in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The Massy study group vs. the PREVAIL JAPAN trial. J Cardiol 2015; 65: 112–116.
– reference: 11. Fallon JM, DeSimone JP, Brennan JM, O’Brien S, Thibault DP, DiScipio AW, et al. The incidence and consequence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106: 14–22.
– reference: 10. Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, Ruel M, Al-Atassi T, Dumont E, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. Circulation 2019; 139: 2685–2702.
– reference: 16. Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, Kodali S, Thourani VH, Szeto WY, et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: Insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 701–711.
– reference: 17. Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Yakubov SJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Kleiman NS, et al. Impact of annular size on outcomes after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105: 1129–1136.
– reference: 9. Sato M, Suenaga E, Koga S, Kawasaki H. Aortic valve replacement with smaller valve size. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2011; 19: 314–319.
– reference: 22. Okamoto Y, Yamamoto K, Sugimoto T, Yoshii S. Early and late outcomes of aortic valve replacement with aortic annular enlargement: A propensity analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 64: 410–417.
– reference: 15. Head SJ, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Gleason TG, et al. Computed tomography-based indexed aortic annulus size to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: e007396.
– reference: 5. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: e1–e142.
– reference: 7. Domoto S, Niinami H, Uwabe K, Koike H, Tabata M, Morita K, et al. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 22: 19–25.
– reference: 12. Hoffmann G, Ogbamicael SA, Jochens A, Frank D, Lutter G, Cremer J, et al. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: A retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 469–474.
– reference: 8. Yoshikawa K, Fukunaga S, Arinaga K, Hori H, Nakamura E, Ueda T, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude medical valve in Japanese patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1303–1308.
– reference: 13. Franzen SF, Huljebrant IE, Konstantinov IE, Nylander E, Olin CL. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with small aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5(Suppl 3): S284–S288.
– reference: 6. Minakata K, Tanaka S, Okawa Y, Shimamoto M, Kaneko T, Takahara Y, et al. Long-term outcome of the carpentier-edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in Japanese patients. Circ J 2014; 78: 882–889.
– reference: 19. Overtchouk P, Modine T. A comparison of alternative access routes for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2018; 16: 749–756.
– reference: 20. Overtchouk P, Modine T. Alternate access for TAVI: Stay clear of the chest. Interv Cardiol 2018; 13: 145–150.
– reference: 1. Klautz RJM, Kappetein AP, Lange R, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, Bapat V, et al. Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 52: 425–431.
– reference: 3. Watanabe Y, Morice M, Kozuma K, Yamamoto M, Kawashima H, Yashima F, et al. Comparison of aortic annulus dimensions between Japanese and European patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation as determined by multi-detector computed tomography: Results from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimised transCathEter vAlvular interveNtion) registry and a European single-centre cohort. AsiaIntervention 2016; 2: 49–56.
– reference: 4. Ohira S, Miyata H, Doi K, Motomura N, Takamoto S, Yaku H. Risk model of aortic valve replacement after cardiovascular surgery based on a National Japanese Database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51: 347–353.
– reference: 21. Geis NA, Chorianopoulos E, Kallenbach K, Andre F, Pleger ST, Karck M, et al. Feasibility of sheathless transfemoral aortic valve implantation in patients with small access vessel diameters. Clin Res Cardiol 2014; 103: 775–780.
– reference: 23. Kitamura M, Satoh M, Hachida M, Endo M, Hashimoto A, Koyanagi H. Aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus with or without annular enlargement. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5(Suppl 3): S289–S293.
– reference: 18. Stamou SC, Lin N, James T, Rothenberg M, Lovitz L, Faber C, et al. Alternative access versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians. J Invasive Cardiol 2019; 31: 171–175.
– reference: 2. Sabik JF 3rd, Rao V, Lange R, Kappetein AP, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, et al. One-year outcomes associated with a novel stented bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156: 1368–1377.e1365.
– ident: 3
– ident: 18
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.059
– ident: 5
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363498
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.1177/0218492311419449
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001681
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.15420/icr.2018.22.1
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0713-3
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx066
– ident: 13
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.031
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw247
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv284
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.05.001
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1524295
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.171
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038408
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.090
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-13-1068
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563669
– ident: 23
SSID ssj0029059
Score 2.3071854
Snippet Background:The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus...
The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
jstage
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1035
SubjectTerms Aged
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic stenosis
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Bovine pericardial tissue valve
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Humans
Japan
Male
Surgical aortic valve
Treatment Outcome
Title Two-Year Results of the 17-mm Avalus Aortic Valve in the PERIGON Japan Trial
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/85/7/85_CJ-20-1024/_article/-char/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776017
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2506511582
Volume 85
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Circulation Journal, 2021/06/25, Vol.85(7), pp.1035-1041
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKQIgXxDflS0biBUUZjZPUzhOqqnVV1XUIpah7itzUhjRrgtoEBP8A_zbnj6YdbNLgxYpcn5P6fvbd2XdnhN54C5hFPKQuEbzjBqHaaJKBSncnmNeJUp8KFeB8MukOp8FoFs5arV97Xkt1NT9Mf14aV_I_XIU64KuKkv0HzjadQgU8A3-hBA5DeT0efy_dM5WJ56PY1OfGK0MpkiASViunpxJ5b5xeqQidT_z8m9h6NX4A8-34dOKMQFQWTqw-dV9L7Wfr1F7r1aSWuCrfhOpOdyM2wtkntP6gzS5unhlF9ayueN4Ig0G9tPVxuSp_1HnWbGXzLC9z-NmGD1UNzQTol9lKUw2z9Y7K7l4Q7WVlIp3tgusH1A0YMWcz4pI6u0qzcA-NdG_J9Tom38lfsoDoCz1S-OPLw_4IgAMix8RrX0y7PTlNBtPxOImPZvENdJOAvaGuwjieNb5CJOroW_eaD7Pn3fCGd3_2f0G_ubUEFf-zuNp60VpMfA_dteYH7hks3UctUTxAt0-sg8VDNN5CCltI4VJiYDHWkMIGUthACmtI4azQDSyksMYC1pB6hKaDo7g_dO2FG24KWnvlspQKRnhnwXgEeh2Hp67K6KgC8zjohQHYOHMapjyVnPgLGnFv4cmIRd1FFIW-9B-jg6IsxFOEJeMkkIQTIv1gHko29yIhQZeVshsJRtvo7XaYkq8mr0qi7FEY0kQPadIfJUQ5SJCgjd6bcWxa2hlnW7IwoarYUewafOFrWCna6PWWAQksn-pMDKZFWW8SsAC6YHOEjLTRE8OZ5i2-T5XHGH12Dern6M4O3i_QQbWuxUtQV6v5Kw2l3y9SlQA
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two-Year+Results+of+the+17-mm+Avalus+Aortic+Valve+in+the+PERIGON+Japan+Trial&rft.jtitle=Circulation+journal+%3A+official+journal+of+the+Japanese+Circulation+Society&rft.au=Okita%2C+Yutaka&rft.au=Fujita%2C+Tomoyuki&rft.au=Zaikokuji%2C+Kenta&rft.au=Nakajima%2C+Hiroyuki&rft.date=2021-06-25&rft.issn=1347-4820&rft.eissn=1347-4820&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1035&rft_id=info:doi/10.1253%2Fcircj.CJ-20-1024&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1346-9843&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1346-9843&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1346-9843&client=summon