A systematic comparison of human mitochondrial genome assembly tools
Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC bioinformatics Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
13.09.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Abstract Background Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. Results In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. Conclusions Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. Abstract Background Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. Results In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. Conclusions Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. BackgroundMitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research.ResultsIn this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively.ConclusionsBased on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. Background Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research. Results In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively. Conclusions Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. Keywords: Mitochondria, Genome, Benchmark, Assembly Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research.BACKGROUNDMitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a eukaryotic host cell, the mitochondria contain a separate genome whose origin is linked with the endosymbiosis of a prokaryotic cell by the host cell and encode independent genomic information throughout their genomes. Mitochondrial genomes accommodate essential genes and are regularly utilized in biotechnology and phylogenetics. Various assemblers capable of generating complete mitochondrial genomes are being continuously developed. These tools often use whole-genome sequencing data as an input containing reads from the mitochondrial genome. Till now, no published work has explored the systematic comparison of all the available tools for assembling human mitochondrial genomes using short-read sequencing data. This evaluation is required to identify the best tool that can be well-optimized for small-scale projects or even national-level research.In this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively.RESULTSIn this study, we have tested the mitochondrial genome assemblers for both simulated datasets and whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets of humans. For the highest computational setting of 16 computational threads with the simulated dataset having 1000X read depth, MitoFlex took the least execution time of 69 s, and IOGA took the longest execution time of 1278 s. NOVOPlasty utilized the least computational memory of approximately 0.098 GB for the same setting, whereas IOGA utilized the highest computational memory of 11.858 GB. In the case of WGS datasets for humans, GetOrganelle and MitoFlex performed the best in capturing the SNPs information with a mean F1-score of 0.919 at the sequencing depth of 10X. MToolBox and NOVOPlasty performed consistently across all sequencing depths with a mean F1 score of 0.897 and 0.890, respectively.Based on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data.CONCLUSIONSBased on the overall performance metrics and consistency in assembly quality for all sequencing data, MToolBox performed the best. However, NOVOPlasty was the second fastest tool in execution time despite being single-threaded, and it utilized the least computational resources among all the assemblers when tested on simulated datasets. Therefore, NOVOPlasty may be more practical when there is a significant sample size and a lack of computational resources. Besides, as long-read sequencing gains popularity, mitochondrial genome assemblers must be developed to use long-read sequencing data. |
| ArticleNumber | 341 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Mahar, Nirmal Singh Sundar, Durai Satyam, Rohit Gupta, Ishaan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Mahar, Nirmal Singh – sequence: 2 fullname: Satyam, Rohit – sequence: 3 fullname: Sundar, Durai – sequence: 4 fullname: Gupta, Ishaan |
| BookMark | eNptkk2PFCEQhjtmTdxd_QOeOvGih16BhgZOZrJ-TbKJiR9nUk0XM0y6YYRu4_x7mZ2NOsZwgBRPvVRR71V1EWLAqnpOyQ2lqnudKVNCN4S1DRGci6Z9VF1SLmnDKBEXf52fVFc57wihUhFxWb1d1fmQZ5xg9ra2cdpD8jmGOrp6u0wQ6snP0W5jGJKHsd5giBPWkDNO_Xio5xjH_LR67GDM-Oxhv66-vX_39fZjc_fpw_p2dddYIcXctKg0kYpJ13dKM4FEdQMSoFjqlgoZaC4douS9tqAZh66HnoLkTFCmh_a6Wp90hwg7s09-gnQwEby5D8S0MZBKHyOagkvrXE9613FErrGlTrtWa0JBtKJovTlp7Zd-wsFimBOMZ6LnN8FvzSb-MJRwrTrOisLLB4UUvy-YZzP5bHEcIWBcsmGFUloR2hX0xT_oLi4plL86UqUcUqb4h9pA6cAHF8vD9ihqVrITrNOyO1I3_6HKGnDyttjC-RI_S3h1llCYGX_OG1hyNusvn89ZdmJtijkndL8_hBJzdJo5Oc2UiZl7p5m2_QU9DMYP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_genes15050617 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab111 10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90006-2 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 10.1007/BF01734101 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944 10.1186/1471-2164-14-633 10.1038/s41586-022-04601-8 10.1186/s12864-022-08743-x 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021 10.1038/s41598-019-53449-y 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty630 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 10.1038/jhg.2013.120 10.1007/BF00163806 10.1093/nar/gkw247 10.3389/fgene.2022.692257 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003310 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S12 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.002 10.1126/science.abj6987 10.1038/nrg3966 10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5 10.1038/290457a0 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.011 10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5768 10.1093/gbe/evad041 10.1093/nar/gkz173 10.1038/13779 10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 10.1186/s12864-020-07183-9 10.1038/nrg1606 10.1038/s41588-019-0557-x 10.1038/325031a0 10.1093/bib/bbab538 10.1089/cmb.2019.0505 10.1086/303004 10.1093/bmb/ldt017 10.3390/ijms22042060 10.1038/s41592-022-01716-8 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110352 10.1007/BF01225519 10.1111/bij.12642 10.1186/s12864-016-3412-9 10.1093/nar/gkt371 10.20944/preprints201808.0423.v1 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 10.1086/302197 10.20517/jtgg.2020.31 10.1038/s41576-020-00284-x 10.1186/s12859-017-1927-y 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu483 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. – notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88E 8AL 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12859-023-05445-3 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Biological Sciences Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Biological Science Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Computer and Information Systems Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Computing ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology |
| EISSN | 1471-2105 |
| EndPage | 19 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_29d7cffb0bf64ee49e31f9f39901a535 A765269768 10_1186_s12859_023_05445_3 |
| GeographicLocations | India |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: India |
| GroupedDBID | --- -A0 0R~ 23N 2WC 3V. 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ISR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M0N M1P M48 M7P MK~ ML0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P P62 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XH6 XSB ABVAZ AFGXO AFNRJ 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D P64 PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-3e8907827fb68925e086de0a1e02378e2a947fee74b9ca924a6bab1a7425129d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | RPM |
| ISSN | 1471-2105 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 05 15:46:38 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:29:36 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 30 19:46:59 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 21:07:51 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 00:22:41 EST 2024 Fri Feb 02 04:38:46 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 21:33:52 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 19:57:27 EDT 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c575t-3e8907827fb68925e086de0a1e02378e2a947fee74b9ca924a6bab1a7425129d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10498642/ |
| PQID | 2865350118 |
| PQPubID | 44065 |
| PageCount | 19 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_29d7cffb0bf64ee49e31f9f39901a535 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10498642 proquest_miscellaneous_2864898016 proquest_journals_2865350118 gale_infotracmisc_A765269768 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A765269768 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A765269768 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12859_023_05445_3 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-09-13 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-13 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-13 day: 13 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC bioinformatics |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | R Yu (5445_CR45) 2023; 15 JB Stewart (5445_CR1) 2015; 16 LM Weber (5445_CR36) 2019; 20 PF Chinnery (5445_CR11) 2013; 106 RM Andrews (5445_CR7) 1999; 23 A Soorni (5445_CR47) 2017; 18 HEL Lischer (5445_CR28) 2017; 18 H Li (5445_CR56) 2018; 34 G Marçais (5445_CR62) 2018; 14 A Kurabayashi (5445_CR18) 2013; 14 DR Smith (5445_CR19) 2016; 15 WM Brown (5445_CR6) 1982; 18 PDN Hebert (5445_CR17) 2003; 270 AR Quinlan (5445_CR57) 2010; 26 RE Green (5445_CR8) 2008; 134 FT Bakker (5445_CR40) 2015; 117 5445_CR65 S Dhorne-Pollet (5445_CR14) 2020; 21 Y Yuan (5445_CR21) 2020; 52 5445_CR64 S Anderson (5445_CR2) 1981; 290 H Gourlé (5445_CR52) 2019; 35 5445_CR63 S Nurk (5445_CR51) 2022; 376 SL Amarasinghe (5445_CR66) 2020; 21 S Kovaka (5445_CR68) 2023; 20 5445_CR58 Y Yao (5445_CR13) 2019; 9 J-Y Li (5445_CR42) 2021 B Budowle (5445_CR26) 2003; 4 JV Lopez (5445_CR32) 1994; 39 T Wang (5445_CR20) 2022; 604 H Oota (5445_CR5) 1999; 64 DM Behar (5445_CR9) 2012; 90 SE Calvo (5445_CR4) 2012; 4 A Gurevich (5445_CR59) 2013; 29 C Hahn (5445_CR41) 2013; 41 5445_CR55 5445_CR54 J-J Jin (5445_CR38) 2020; 21 5445_CR50 H Weissensteiner (5445_CR60) 2016; 44 YS Lee (5445_CR34) 2009; 10 K Al-Nakeeb (5445_CR30) 2017; 18 JB Stewart (5445_CR12) 2021; 22 J Alves-Silva (5445_CR23) 2000; 67 G Meng (5445_CR31) 2019; 47 JA Freudenthal (5445_CR44) 2020; 21 5445_CR48 F Alqahtani (5445_CR49) 2020; 27 5445_CR43 Y Milián-García (5445_CR46) 2022; 23 MW Bruce (5445_CR27) 2003; 4 M-H Song (5445_CR39) 2022; 23 RG Harrison (5445_CR15) 1989; 4 C Calabrese (5445_CR29) 2014; 30 F Keith Barker (5445_CR16) 2014; 79 5445_CR37 5445_CR35 EKK Ip (5445_CR61) 2022; 13 N Dierckxsens (5445_CR33) 2017; 45 H-J Bandelt (5445_CR10) 2014; 59 G Begum (5445_CR67) 2021; 22 E Watson (5445_CR53) 2020 RW Taylor (5445_CR25) 2005; 6 RL Cann (5445_CR22) 1987; 325 M Denaro (5445_CR24) 1981; 78 S Lutz (5445_CR3) 1996; 109 |
| References_xml | – year: 2021 ident: 5445_CR42 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab111 contributor: fullname: J-Y Li – volume: 18 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 5445_CR28 publication-title: BMC Bioinform doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6 contributor: fullname: HEL Lischer – volume: 4 start-page: 6 year: 1989 ident: 5445_CR15 publication-title: Trends Ecol Evol doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90006-2 contributor: fullname: RG Harrison – volume: 26 start-page: 841 year: 2010 ident: 5445_CR57 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 contributor: fullname: AR Quinlan – ident: 5445_CR63 – volume: 18 start-page: 225 year: 1982 ident: 5445_CR6 publication-title: J Mol Evol doi: 10.1007/BF01734101 contributor: fullname: WM Brown – ident: 5445_CR54 – volume: 14 start-page: e1005944 year: 2018 ident: 5445_CR62 publication-title: PLoS Comput Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944 contributor: fullname: G Marçais – volume: 14 start-page: 633 year: 2013 ident: 5445_CR18 publication-title: BMC Genom doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-633 contributor: fullname: A Kurabayashi – volume: 604 start-page: 437 year: 2022 ident: 5445_CR20 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04601-8 contributor: fullname: T Wang – volume: 23 start-page: 584 year: 2022 ident: 5445_CR46 publication-title: BMC Genom doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08743-x contributor: fullname: Y Milián-García – ident: 5445_CR35 – ident: 5445_CR50 – ident: 5445_CR58 – volume: 134 start-page: 416 year: 2008 ident: 5445_CR8 publication-title: Cell doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021 contributor: fullname: RE Green – volume: 9 start-page: 17411 year: 2019 ident: 5445_CR13 publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53449-y contributor: fullname: Y Yao – volume: 35 start-page: 521 year: 2019 ident: 5445_CR52 publication-title: Bioinform doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty630 contributor: fullname: H Gourlé – volume: 34 start-page: 3094 year: 2018 ident: 5445_CR56 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 contributor: fullname: H Li – ident: 5445_CR43 – volume: 59 start-page: 66 year: 2014 ident: 5445_CR10 publication-title: J Hum Genet doi: 10.1038/jhg.2013.120 contributor: fullname: H-J Bandelt – volume: 39 start-page: 174 year: 1994 ident: 5445_CR32 publication-title: J Mol Evol doi: 10.1007/BF00163806 contributor: fullname: JV Lopez – volume: 44 start-page: W64 year: 2016 ident: 5445_CR60 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw247 contributor: fullname: H Weissensteiner – volume: 13 start-page: 692257 year: 2022 ident: 5445_CR61 publication-title: Front Genet doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.692257 contributor: fullname: EKK Ip – volume: 4 start-page: 118ra10 year: 2012 ident: 5445_CR4 publication-title: Sci Transl Med doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003310 contributor: fullname: SE Calvo – volume: 10 start-page: S12 issue: Suppl 3 year: 2009 ident: 5445_CR34 publication-title: BMC Genom doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S12 contributor: fullname: YS Lee – volume: 90 start-page: 675 year: 2012 ident: 5445_CR9 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.002 contributor: fullname: DM Behar – volume: 376 start-page: 44 year: 2022 ident: 5445_CR51 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.abj6987 contributor: fullname: S Nurk – volume: 16 start-page: 530 year: 2015 ident: 5445_CR1 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg3966 contributor: fullname: JB Stewart – volume: 21 start-page: 30 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR66 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5 contributor: fullname: SL Amarasinghe – volume: 290 start-page: 457 year: 1981 ident: 5445_CR2 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/290457a0 contributor: fullname: S Anderson – ident: 5445_CR64 – volume: 45 year: 2017 ident: 5445_CR33 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res contributor: fullname: N Dierckxsens – volume: 79 start-page: 313 year: 2014 ident: 5445_CR16 publication-title: Mol Phylogenet Evol doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.011 contributor: fullname: F Keith Barker – volume: 20 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 5445_CR36 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1738-8 contributor: fullname: LM Weber – volume: 21 start-page: 241 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR38 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5 contributor: fullname: J-J Jin – volume: 78 start-page: 5768 year: 1981 ident: 5445_CR24 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5768 contributor: fullname: M Denaro – volume: 15 start-page: evad041 year: 2023 ident: 5445_CR45 publication-title: Genome Biol. Evol. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evad041 contributor: fullname: R Yu – volume: 47 start-page: e63 year: 2019 ident: 5445_CR31 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz173 contributor: fullname: G Meng – volume: 23 start-page: 147 year: 1999 ident: 5445_CR7 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/13779 contributor: fullname: RM Andrews – volume: 21 start-page: 254 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR44 publication-title: Genome Biol doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02153-6 contributor: fullname: JA Freudenthal – volume: 21 start-page: 785 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR14 publication-title: BMC Genom doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07183-9 contributor: fullname: S Dhorne-Pollet – ident: 5445_CR65 – volume: 6 start-page: 389 year: 2005 ident: 5445_CR25 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/nrg1606 contributor: fullname: RW Taylor – volume: 52 start-page: 342 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR21 publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0557-x contributor: fullname: Y Yuan – volume: 325 start-page: 31 year: 1987 ident: 5445_CR22 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/325031a0 contributor: fullname: RL Cann – volume: 23 start-page: 538 year: 2022 ident: 5445_CR39 publication-title: Brief Bioinform doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab538 contributor: fullname: M-H Song – volume: 27 start-page: 1407 year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR49 publication-title: J Comput Biol doi: 10.1089/cmb.2019.0505 contributor: fullname: F Alqahtani – volume: 67 start-page: 444 year: 2000 ident: 5445_CR23 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1086/303004 contributor: fullname: J Alves-Silva – volume: 15 start-page: 47 year: 2016 ident: 5445_CR19 publication-title: Brief Funct Genom contributor: fullname: DR Smith – volume: 106 start-page: 135 year: 2013 ident: 5445_CR11 publication-title: Br Med Bull doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldt017 contributor: fullname: PF Chinnery – ident: 5445_CR37 – volume: 22 start-page: 2060 year: 2021 ident: 5445_CR67 publication-title: Int J Mol Sci doi: 10.3390/ijms22042060 contributor: fullname: G Begum – volume: 20 start-page: 12 year: 2023 ident: 5445_CR68 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01716-8 contributor: fullname: S Kovaka – volume: 4 start-page: 119 year: 2003 ident: 5445_CR26 publication-title: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110352 contributor: fullname: B Budowle – volume: 109 start-page: 205 year: 1996 ident: 5445_CR3 publication-title: Int. J. Legal Med. doi: 10.1007/BF01225519 contributor: fullname: S Lutz – volume: 117 start-page: 33 year: 2015 ident: 5445_CR40 publication-title: Biol J Linn Soc Lond doi: 10.1111/bij.12642 contributor: fullname: FT Bakker – volume: 18 start-page: 49 year: 2017 ident: 5445_CR47 publication-title: BMC Genom doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3412-9 contributor: fullname: A Soorni – volume: 41 start-page: e129 year: 2013 ident: 5445_CR41 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt371 contributor: fullname: C Hahn – ident: 5445_CR48 doi: 10.20944/preprints201808.0423.v1 – volume: 29 start-page: 1072 year: 2013 ident: 5445_CR59 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 contributor: fullname: A Gurevich – volume: 270 start-page: S96 issue: Supple 1 year: 2003 ident: 5445_CR17 publication-title: Proc Biol Sci contributor: fullname: PDN Hebert – volume: 64 start-page: 250 year: 1999 ident: 5445_CR5 publication-title: Am J Hum Genet doi: 10.1086/302197 contributor: fullname: H Oota – year: 2020 ident: 5445_CR53 publication-title: J Transl Genet Genom doi: 10.20517/jtgg.2020.31 contributor: fullname: E Watson – volume: 22 start-page: 106 year: 2021 ident: 5445_CR12 publication-title: Nat Rev Genet doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00284-x contributor: fullname: JB Stewart – volume: 18 start-page: 510 year: 2017 ident: 5445_CR30 publication-title: BMC Bioinform doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1927-y contributor: fullname: K Al-Nakeeb – volume: 30 start-page: 3115 year: 2014 ident: 5445_CR29 publication-title: Bioinformatics doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu483 contributor: fullname: C Calabrese – volume: 4 start-page: 119 year: 2003 ident: 5445_CR27 publication-title: Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.4.070802.110352 contributor: fullname: MW Bruce – ident: 5445_CR55 |
| SSID | ssj0017805 |
| Score | 2.4771855 |
| Snippet | Abstract
Background
Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite... Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a part of a... Background Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a... BackgroundMitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite being a... Abstract Background Mitochondria are the cell organelles that produce most of the chemical energy required to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Despite... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Assembling Assembly Bats Benchmark Biotechnology Chemical energy Comparative analysis Computer applications Datasets DNA sequencing Evolution Gene sequencing Genetic research Genome Genomes Human genetics Methods Mitochondria Mitochondrial DNA Nucleotide sequencing Organelles Performance measurement Phylogeny Public software Simulation Single-nucleotide polymorphism Software Whole genome sequencing |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELVQJSQuiPIhAi0yCIkDirq2Ezs-LoWqIMEBqNSbZTtjQOomqNk99N93xsluGzhw4ZqZKPGMxzNPtt8w9hpMDUpZUYIAQIDibRkQaGC41ybICFpmsurPX_TpWfXpvD6_1eqLzoSN9MCj4Y6kbU1MKSxC0hVAZUGJZJOi_Rxfq5G9VNRbMDXtHxBT__aKTKOPBkE8bSXmp3JB7DOlmqWhzNb_95r85znJW4nn5AG7P1WMfDn-6T67A91DdnfsIXn1iL1f8hs2Zh53bQV5n3huwMdXGLS4yHUtzTVOpKwr4FgzwypcXPF1318Mj9nZyYfvx6fl1BqhjFhfrUsFjaXkblLQjZU1IDJpYeEF4BhNA9LbyiQAUwUbPWIsr4MPwiMQpgzfqidsr-s7eMq48Fr4SLxXIla1TNYbK7VvAqRodWsL9nZrKfd7ZMBwGTk02o12dfhNl-3qVMHekTF3msRenR-gT93kU_cvnxbsFbnCET9FRwdgfvjNMLiP3766pdHUEx1BUsHeTEqpR-9EP90nwFERpdVM82CmiQEU5-Ktx90UwIOjC7u05ypQ_HInpjfpUFoH_SbrVI3FFK8L1sxmymz4c0n362cm8UYYTMz48tn_MNhzdk_myW1LoQ7Y3vpyA4dYLK3DixwX13_2EW0 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA_aIvhSrB-4bZUogg8SetmP7OZJrralChapFvoWkuykCr3dtnv30P_emVzu6ir4upllN5nvTPIbxt5BXUFRaClAAmCCYrVwmGigule1yz2oPIJVfz1VJ-fll4vqIm24DelY5comRkPd9p72yPfpBiUVwWTz8fpGUNcoqq6mFhoP2WYuSyrTbh4cnX47W9cRCLF_dVWmUfuDJLw2gX5KTAiFRhQjdxRR-_-1zX-fl_zDAR0_YVspcuTTJau32QPonrJHy16Sd8_Y4ZTfozJzv24vyPvAYyM-PkPlRWPXtSRznMBZZ8AxdoaZu7rj876_Gp6z8-OjH59ORGqRIDzGWXNRQKPJydfBqUbnFWCG0sLESsA51g3kVpd1AKhLp73FXMsqZ520mBCTp2-LF2yj6zt4ybi0SlpP-FfSl1UetK11rmzjIHitWp2xD6uVMtdLJAwTM4hGmeW6Gvymietqiowd0GKuKQnFOj7oby9NUgqDP1D7ENzEBVUClBoKGXQoqFZnkdsZe0usMIRT0dFBmEu7GAbz-fuZmdaKeqNjspSx94ko9Mgdb9O9ApwVQVuNKPdGlKhIfjy84rhJijyYe7HL2Jv1ML1Jh9M66BeRpmw0unqVsWYkKaPpj0e6Xz8jmDemw4SQn-_8_-u77HEexVYLWeyxjfntAl5hODR3r5PM_wbubwmx priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lj9MwELaWRUhcVjxFYUEGIXFAhjpO7PiAUHmsFqTlAFTam2Wn412kNlmaVqL_nhk36RLYC9fM5OHxTDyf7PmGsedgClDKSgESAAGKtyIg0MBwL0zIKtBZIqs--aKPp_nn0-J0j_XtjjoDtldCO-onNV3OX_36uXmLAf8mBXypX7eSWNgErj5iTNwyQl1j17Nc5eTxJ_nlrgLx96dqIyMFQp2iL6K58hmDhSrx-f_71_77JOUfS9PRLXbQ5ZR8snWC22wP6jvsxrbL5OYu-zDhl3zNvNo1HuRN5KlFH19gWKMl6hl5Iyfa1gVwzKphEeYbvmqaeXuPTY8-fn9_LLrmCaLCDGwlFJSWln8Tgy5tVgBilxmMvQQcoykh8zY3EcDkwVYeUZjXwQfpESpTDjBT99l-3dTwgHHptfQVMWPJKi-yaL2xmfZlgFhZPbMj9rK3lLvYcmS4hC1K7bZ2dfhOl-zq1Ii9I2PuNInfOl1olmeuCxeHH2CqGMM4RJ0D5BaUjDYq2sXzhSpG7BlNhSMGi5qOyJz5ddu6T9--uonR1DUdYdSIveiUYoOzU_mu4gBHRaRXA83DgSaGWDUU9zPueg91VNJLu7ISxU93YrqTjq3V0KyTTl5aTAL0iJUDTxkMfyipf5wnmm8EysSdnz38L_M-Yjez5MVWSHXI9lfLNTzGvGkVnqRg-A0m2xEu priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
| Title | A systematic comparison of human mitochondrial genome assembly tools |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2865350118 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2864898016/abstract/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10498642 https://doaj.org/article/29d7cffb0bf64ee49e31f9f39901a535 |
| Volume | 24 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe2ISReEJ-iMKqAkHhAWes4sePHbqwMpE7TYFLfLNs9j0lNMq3tw_577tykEHjjJQ_xWfHHnc-_-Pw7xj6AKkAIzVPgAAhQrE4dAg0090K5zIPMIln17FyeXeXf5sV8j8nuLkwM2vfu5qheVkf1zc8YW3lb-VEXJza6mJ0ghCBW8Wy0z_aVEB1Gb88OiKW_ux5TytGKE0dbir4pHRPzTCp6Ligy9f-7Hv8dI_mH05k-YY_b3WIy2bbqKduD-hl7uM0fef-cfZ4kv5mYE79LKZg0IYnJ95IKDRYXuHpBepYQIWsFCe6XoXLL-2TdNMvVC3Y1Pf1xcpa2aRFSj3urdSqg1OTYVXCy1FkBiEoWMLYcsI-qhMzqXAUAlTvtLeIrK5113CIIJu--EC_ZQd3U8Iol3EpuPXFecZ8XWdBW6Uza0kHwWi70gH3qRsrcbtkvTEQNpTTbcTX4TRPH1YgBO6bB3EkSc3V80dxdm3b-DDZA-RDc2AWZA-QaBA86CDqfs4UoBuw9TYUhboqagl-u7Wa1Ml-_X5qJkpQPHQHSgH1shUKDs-Nte5cAe0V0Vj3Jw54kGo_vF3czblrjXRm6rEvnrRyL3-2KqSYFpNXQbKJMXmp073LAyp6m9LrfL0F9jgTenf6-_v-qb9ijLKq0Trk4ZAfruw28xe3R2g3RJuYKn-X0y5A9OD49v7gcxl8N-Jzl5TBayy_F-RU2 |
| link.rule.ids | 230,315,733,786,790,870,891,2115,2236,12083,12792,21416,24346,27955,27956,31752,31753,33406,33407,33777,33778,43343,43633,43838,53825,53827 |
| linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZgKwQXxFMEChiExAFZXefhxCe0hVZbaFeotFJvlu2MC1I3Kc3uof-eGW92S0DiGk-UeN7jxzeMvYOygCzTUoAEwALFauGw0EBzL0qXelBpBKs-mqnpaf7lrDjrF9y6_ljl2idGR123ntbId-gGJW2Cyerj5S9BXaNod7VvoXGbbRHkZjViW7t7s2_Hm30EQuxfX5Wp1E4nCa9NYJwSY0KhEdkgHEXU_n9989_nJf8IQPsP2P0-c-STlagfslvQPGJ3Vr0krx-zzxN-g8rM_aa9IG8Dj434-ByNF51dU5POcQJnnQPH3Bnm7uKaL9r2onvCTvf3Tj5NRd8iQXjMsxYig0pTkC-DU5VOC8AKpYaxlYBzLCtIrc7LAFDmTnuLtZZVzjppsSCmSF9nT9moaRt4xri0SlpP-FfS50UatC11qmzlIHitap2wD2tOmcsVEoaJFUSlzIqvBr9pIl9NlrBdYuaGklCs44P26tz0RmHwB0ofghu7oHKAXEMmgw4Z7dVZlHbC3pIoDOFUNHQQ5twuu84cfD82k1JRb3QslhL2vicKLUrH2_5eAc6KoK0GlNsDSjQkPxxeS9z0htyZG7VL2JvNML1Jh9MaaJeRJq80hnqVsGqgKYPpD0eanz8imDeWw4SQnz7__9dfs7vTk6NDc3gw-_qC3UujCmshs202Wlwt4SWmRgv3qtf_36ZoDKc |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagCMSFd8VCgYCQOKBs1nk48XFpWbVAqwqoVImDZTvjUrGbrJrdQ_n1zDjJQsqt13is2J4Zez55_A1jbyHPIEkkD4EDIEDRMjQINNDds9zEFkTsyaoPj8T-SfrpNDvtsiqbLq2ysuZ8XM0X4-r8p8-tXC5s1OeJRceHuwghiFU8jpali26yW-i0cd4j9e4Ggbj6-0cyhYgaTkxtIZ5Q4YT4Z8JkcBB5vv7_d-WrmZL_HD2z--xHP-g24-TXeL0yY_v7Cp_j9Wb1gN3rItJg2so8ZDegesRutzUqLx-zvWnwl-05sJuyhUHtAl_gL1jgpoCbaFWSLQdE-rqAAGNyWJj5ZbCq63nzhJ3MPn7f3Q-70guhxfhtFSZQSAoecmdEIeMMEPmUMNEccAXzAmIt09wB5KmRViOG08JowzUCbYogymSbbVV1BU9ZwLXg2hKvFrdpFjupcxkLXRhwVopSjtj7Xg9q2TJsKI9MCqFarSn8p_JaU8mIfSBVbSSJHdt_qC_OVLeaCgeQW-fMxDiRAqQSEu6kS-gOUGdJNmJvSNGK-C8qSrA50-umUQffvqppLqjmOoKwEXvXCbkadW91914BZ0WUWQPJnYEkOqgdNvf2pLoNolH0IJjudDk2v940U09KequgXnuZtJAYQogRKwZ2OJj-sAWty5OE99b07PpdX7E7x3sz9eXg6PNzdjf2viNDnuywrdXFGl5gNLYyL73b_QEo4TSp |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+systematic+comparison+of+human+mitochondrial+genome+assembly+tools&rft.jtitle=BMC+bioinformatics&rft.au=Mahar%2C+Nirmal+Singh&rft.au=Satyam%2C+Rohit&rft.au=Sundar%2C+Durai&rft.au=Gupta%2C+Ishaan&rft.date=2023-09-13&rft.issn=1471-2105&rft.eissn=1471-2105&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12859-023-05445-3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12859_023_05445_3 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2105&client=summon |