Responsiveness of domesticated goats towards various stressors following long-term cognitive test exposure
Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presen...
Saved in:
| Published in | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 10; p. e12893 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
PeerJ. Ltd
29.03.2022
PeerJ, Inc PeerJ Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4–5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation
per se
or the reward associated with the human–animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food (‘Cognitive’, COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests (‘Positive’, POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests (‘Isolation’, ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing
per se
(COG–POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human–animal interactions (POS–ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4-5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation per se or the reward associated with the human-animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food ('Cognitive', COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests ('Positive', POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests ('Isolation', ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing per se (COG-POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human-animal interactions (POS-ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats.Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4-5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation per se or the reward associated with the human-animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food ('Cognitive', COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests ('Positive', POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests ('Isolation', ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing per se (COG-POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human-animal interactions (POS-ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats. Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4–5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation per se or the reward associated with the human–animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food (‘Cognitive’, COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests (‘Positive’, POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests (‘Isolation’, ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing per se (COG–POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human–animal interactions (POS–ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats. Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4-5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation per se or the reward associated with the human-animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food ('Cognitive', COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests ('Positive', POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests ('Isolation', ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing per se (COG-POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human-animal interactions (POS-ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats. Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress responsiveness and thus on welfare. However, confounding factors often hamper the interpretation of study results. In this study, we used human-presented object-choice tests (in form of visual discrimination and reversal learning tests and a cognitive test battery), to assess the effect of long-term cognitive stimulation (44 sessions over 4-5 months) on behavioural and cardiac responses of female domestic goats in subsequent stress tests. To disentangle whether cognitive stimulation or the reward associated with the human-animal interaction required for testing was affecting the stress responsiveness, we conditioned three treatment groups: goats that were isolated for participation in human-presented cognitive tests and rewarded with food ('Cognitive', COG treatment), goats that were isolated as for the test exposure and rewarded with food by the experimenter without being administered the object-choice tests ('Positive', POS treatment), and goats that were isolated in the same test room but neither received a reward nor were administered the tests ('Isolation', ISO treatment). All treatment groups were subsequently tested in four stress tests: a novel arena test, a novel object test, a novel human test, and a weighing test in which goats had to enter and exit a scale cage. All treatment groups weretested at the same two research sites, each using two selection lines, namely dwarf goats, not selected for production traits, and dairy goats, selected for high productivity. Analysing the data with principal component analysis and linear mixed-effects models, we did not find evidence that cognitive testing (COG-POS contrast) reduces stress responsiveness of goats in subsequent stress tests. However, for dwarf goats but not for dairy goats, we found support for an effect of reward-associated human-animal interactions (POS-ISO contrast) at least for some stress test measures. Our results highlight the need to consider ontogenetic and genetic variation when assessing stress responsiveness and when interacting with goats. |
| ArticleNumber | e12893 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Langbein, Jan Keil, Nina Simmler, Michael Rosenberger, Katrina Nawroth, Christian |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Katrina surname: Rosenberger fullname: Rosenberger, Katrina organization: Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, Centre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland – sequence: 2 givenname: Michael surname: Simmler fullname: Simmler, Michael organization: Digital Production, Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland – sequence: 3 givenname: Jan orcidid: 0000-0002-1170-5431 surname: Langbein fullname: Langbein, Jan organization: Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany – sequence: 4 givenname: Christian orcidid: 0000-0003-4582-4057 surname: Nawroth fullname: Nawroth, Christian organization: Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany – sequence: 5 givenname: Nina orcidid: 0000-0002-3663-7682 surname: Keil fullname: Keil, Nina organization: Centre for Proper Housing of Ruminants and Pigs, Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office, Agroscope, Ettenhausen, Switzerland |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptkttrFDEUxgep2Fr75LsMCCLIrpNJJpcXoRQvhYIg-hwyuUyzzCRrktnqf-_Z3Vp2S5OHhOR3vuR8fC-rkxCDrarXqFkyhtjHtbVptUQtF_hZddYiyhYcd-LkYH9aXeS8amDwljYcv6hOcYcpxxidVasfNq9jyH5jg825jq42cbK5eK2KNfUQVcl1iXcqmVxvVPJxznUuCeCYcu3iOMY7H4Z6jGFYFJumWsch-AKKdQGh2v5Zxzwn-6p67tSY7cX9el79-vL559W3xc33r9dXlzcL3TFcFkQRgZ3pOo170eCGUNEYqzhFjeOAOCpYRzUyVOOWCE2doZR1GnUccUIoPq-u97omqpVcJz-p9FdG5eXuIKZBqgT9jVZSx4V1lqm254QLIXDfGI50j1pMe21A69Neaz33kzXahpLUeCR6fBP8rRziRnLBMGENCLy_F0jx9wx2yMlnbcdRBQtOypZCfwRBJ4C-fYSu4pwCWLWlSMcpJgfUoKABH1yEd_VWVF6yhhNG2p0HyycomMZOXkOEnIfzo4J3BwW3Vo3lNsdxLh7CcQy-OXTkwYr_kQLgwx7QKeacrHtAUCO3mZW7zMpdZoFGj2jti9q-Ch_245M1_wCl0O-g |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46373_9 crossref_primary_10_14202_vetworld_2023_483_490 crossref_primary_10_1080_10888705_2024_2440891 |
| Cites_doi | 10.3168/jds.2017-14248 10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80024-3 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90230-9 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80060-7 10.2527/jas1983.5716 10.1079/9781845936594.0027 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01758.x 10.1017/S1357729800051791 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.035 10.1017/S0022029900019920 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.031 10.1371/journal.pone.0093534 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.06.013 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01019-X 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016 10.1371/journal.pone.0078308 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00085-X 10.1016/0304-3762(80)90133-9 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90145-R 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.014 10.1002/ajp.22444 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00103.x 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.014 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.09.016 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00521-5 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.001 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.007 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90051-2 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.004 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0074579 10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00147-X 10.1016/0378-4320(94)01332-G 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90022-1 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00651-5 10.1111/2041-210X.13393 10.1067/S1526-5900(03)00717-X 10.1038/tp.2015.34 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.016 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.10.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0221794 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.009 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003693 10.1037/h0049174 10.1098/rsos.210656 10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00254-X 10.3389/fvets.2018.00131 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4036 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.006 10.1038/laban.1220 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.007 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80201-X 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.002 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.018 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 10.3168/jds.2017-14111 10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.933 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01272-X 10.1007/s10071-013-0603-5 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80079-6 10.1017/S1751731109990528 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.09.004 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80110-6 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.005 10.1098/rspb.2004.2831 10.1027/1614-2241/a000051 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.003 10.1002/ajp.20995 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2022 Rosenberger et al. COPYRIGHT 2022 PeerJ. Ltd. 2022 Rosenberger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022 Rosenberger et al. 2022 Rosenberger et al. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Rosenberger et al. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 PeerJ. Ltd. – notice: 2022 Rosenberger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022 Rosenberger et al. 2022 Rosenberger et al. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 88I 8FE 8FH 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ LK8 M2P M7P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.12893 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Science Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Biological Sciences Science Database Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 2167-8359 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_6f89efe7a2b8489993b0d81cb1236bcd PMC8973470 A708474246 35368331 10_7717_peerj_12893 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Germany |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Germany |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: DFG grantid: LA 1187/6-1 – fundername: SNF grantid: 310030E-170537 |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 88I 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS AZQEC BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BHPHI BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION DIK DWQXO ECGQY GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HYE IAO IEA IHR IHW ITC KQ8 LK8 M2P M48 M7P M~E OK1 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM W2D YAO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 NPM PQGLB PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FK PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-4a493fd55c3b90304690dea8610f8c57f69756c1d6c3249c6fd6675c158184463 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 2167-8359 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:51 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:31:30 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:15:03 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:47:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:53:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:21:36 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:22:10 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:47:09 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:48 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Selection for productivity Animal handling Stress Animal cognition Habituation |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2022 Rosenberger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c573t-4a493fd55c3b90304690dea8610f8c57f69756c1d6c3249c6fd6675c158184463 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1170-5431 0000-0002-3663-7682 0000-0003-4582-4057 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.7717/peerj.12893 |
| PMID | 35368331 |
| PQID | 2644586344 |
| PQPubID | 2045935 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f89efe7a2b8489993b0d81cb1236bcd pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8973470 proquest_miscellaneous_2646941324 proquest_journals_2644586344 gale_infotracmisc_A708474246 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A708474246 gale_healthsolutions_A708474246 pubmed_primary_35368331 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_12893 crossref_citationtrail_10_7717_peerj_12893 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-03-29 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-03-29 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2022 text: 2022-03-29 day: 29 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Diego – name: San Diego, USA |
| PublicationTitle | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PeerJ |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | PeerJ. Ltd PeerJ, Inc PeerJ Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: PeerJ. Ltd – name: PeerJ, Inc – name: PeerJ Inc |
| References | Budaev (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-11) 2010; 116 Finkemeier (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-19) 2018; 5 Galhardo (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-21) 2011; 102 Nawroth (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-44) 2014; 9 Dantzer (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-16) 1983; 57 Vacca (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-68) 2018; 101 Mohr (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-41) 2002; 75 Revelle (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-57) 2021 Whitehouse (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-72) 2013; 8 Lyons (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-37) 1987; 18 Yamanashi (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-74) 2011; 73 Langbein (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-34) 2009; 120 Grignard (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-23) 2000; 68 Akinsoyinu (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-1) 1977; 44 Bates (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-4) 2015; 67 Spinka (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-66) 2011 Patt (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-48) 2013; 144 Lyons (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-38) 1988; 36 Puppe (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-52) 2007; 105 Sauer (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-62) 2019; 14 Campler (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-12) 2009; 81 Jensen (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-30) 1963; 65 Neave (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-45) 2018; 101 Sneddon (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-65) 2003; 4 Doyle (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-17) 2011; 102 Rosenberger (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-60) 2020; 10 Veissier (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-69) 1992; 33 D’Eath (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-18) 2009; 3 Oesterwind (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-46) 2016; 177 Stamps (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-67) 2010; 85 Langbein (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-32) 2004; 82 Würbel (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-73) 2017; 46 Boissy (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-7) 1997; 61 Brockhurst (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-10) 2015; 5 Da Costa (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-15) 2004; 271 Hughes (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-28) 1988; 36 Lindqvist (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-35) 2008; 114 Rosenberger (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-59) 2021; 8 Beattie (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-5) 2000; 70 Kilgour (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-31) 1995; 37 Raîche (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-56) 2013; 9 Forkman (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-20) 2007; 92 Schütz (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-63) 2001; 107 Carbonaro (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-13) 1992; 51 Morton (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-42) 2013; 16 Boivin (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-9) 1992; 32 Peterson (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-49) 2019; 2020 R Core Team (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-53) 2020 Siebert (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-64) 2011; 131 ASAB & ABS (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-2) 2018; 135 Voelkl (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-71) 2018; 16 Hemsworth (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-25) 2003; 81 Rasmussen (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-54) 2020; 11 Colpoys (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-14) 2014; 159 Meehan (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-40) 2007; 102 Rauw (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-55) 1998; 56 Jacobson (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-29) 2019; 212 Price (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-50) 1980; 6 Boivin (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-8) 1996; 48 Zebunke (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-75) 2013; 118 Boissy (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-6) 1988; 20 Voelkl (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-70) 2020; 21 Hagen (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-24) 2004; 85 Hothorn (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-27) 2008; 50 Romeyer (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-58) 1992; 34 Parker (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-47) 2004; 61 Langbein (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-33) 2008; 79 Lyons (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-36) 1989; 22 Graunke (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-22) 2013; 8 Ruby (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-61) 2015; 77 Manteuffel (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-39) 2009; 118 Aschwanden (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-3) 2008; 95 Hillmann (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-26) 2003; 81 Nawroth (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-43) 2016; 121 Prut (10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-51) 2003; 463 |
| References_xml | – volume: 101 start-page: 7437 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-45 article-title: Personality is associated with feeding behavior and performance in dairy calves publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14248 – volume: 2020 start-page: 2312 issue: 13−15 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-49 article-title: Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era publication-title: Journal of Applied Statistics doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1630372 – volume: 32 start-page: 313 issue: 4 year: 1992 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-9 article-title: Influence of breed and early management on ease of handling and open-field behaviour of cattle publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80024-3 – volume: 18 start-page: 363 issue: 3−4 year: 1987 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-37 article-title: Relationships between heart rates and behavior of goats in encounters with people publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90230-9 – volume: 34 start-page: 93 issue: 1−2 year: 1992 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-58 article-title: Assessment of fear reactions in domestic sheep, and influence of breed and rearing conditions publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80060-7 – volume: 57 start-page: 6 issue: 1 year: 1983 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-16 article-title: Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation publication-title: Journal of Animal Science doi: 10.2527/jas1983.5716 – start-page: 27 volume-title: Animal welfare year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-66 article-title: Environmental challenge and animal agency doi: 10.1079/9781845936594.0027 – volume: 116 start-page: 472 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-11 article-title: Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines publication-title: Ethology doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01758.x – volume: 70 start-page: 443 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-5 article-title: Influence of environmental enrichment on welfare-related behavioural and physiological parameters in growing pigs publication-title: Animal Science doi: 10.1017/S1357729800051791 – volume: 102 start-page: 367 issue: 3−4 year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-21 article-title: The role of predictability in the stress response of a cichlid fish publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.035 – volume: 44 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 1977 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-1 article-title: Studies on milk yield and composition of the West African dwarf goat in Nigeria publication-title: Journal of Dairy Research doi: 10.1017/S0022029900019920 – volume: 102 start-page: 246 issue: 3−4 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-40 article-title: The challenge of challenge: can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare? publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.031 – volume: 9 start-page: 1 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-44 article-title: Exclusion performance in dwarf goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) and sheep (Ovis orientalis aries) publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093534 – volume: 159 start-page: 34 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-14 article-title: Effects of genetic selection for residual feed intake on behavioral reactivity of castrated male pigs to novel stimuli tests publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.06.013 – volume: 48 start-page: 61 issue: 1−2 year: 1996 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-8 article-title: Effects of handling during temporary isolation after early weaning on goat kids’ later response to humans publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01019-X – volume: 120 start-page: 150 issue: 3−4 year: 2009 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-34 article-title: On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: do goats seek cognitive challenges? publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006 – volume: 92 start-page: 340 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-20 article-title: A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016 – volume: 8 start-page: e78308 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-72 article-title: The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078308 – volume: 68 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-23 article-title: The social environment influences the behavioural responses of beef cattle to handling publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00085-X – volume: 6 start-page: 331 issue: 4 year: 1980 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-50 article-title: Behavioral responses to short-term social isolation in sheep and goats publication-title: Applied Animal Ethology doi: 10.1016/0304-3762(80)90133-9 – volume: 51 start-page: 303 issue: 2 year: 1992 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-13 article-title: Behavioral and physiological responses of dairy goats to food thwarting publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90145-R – volume: 118 start-page: 191 issue: 3−4 year: 2009 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-39 article-title: Increasing farm animal welfare by positively motivated instrumental behaviour publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.014 – volume: 77 start-page: 1097 issue: 10 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-61 article-title: The effects of individual cubicle research on the social interactions and individual behavior of brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) publication-title: American Journal of Primatology doi: 10.1002/ajp.22444 – volume: 85 start-page: 301 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-67 article-title: The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives publication-title: Biological Reviews doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00103.x – volume-title: R: a language and environment for statistical computing year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-53 – volume: 212 start-page: 90 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-29 article-title: The effects of cognitive testing on the welfare of zoo-housed Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.014 – volume: 95 start-page: 641 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-3 article-title: Cardiac activity in dairy goats whilst feeding side-by-side at two different distances and during social separation publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.09.016 – volume: 61 start-page: 693 issue: 5 year: 1997 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-7 article-title: Behavioral, cardiac and cortisol responses to brief peer separation and reunion in cattle publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00521-5 – volume: 102 start-page: 503 issue: 5 year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-17 article-title: Measuring judgement bias and emotional reactivity in sheep following long-term exposure to unpredictable and aversive events publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.001 – volume: 82 start-page: 601 issue: 4 year: 2004 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-32 article-title: Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.007 – volume: 20 start-page: 259 issue: 3−4 year: 1988 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-6 article-title: Effects of early handling on heifers’ subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(88)90051-2 – volume: 79 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-33 article-title: Concurrent recall of serially learned visual discrimination problems in dwarf goats (Capra hircus) publication-title: Behavioural Processes doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.004 – volume: 107 start-page: 753 issue: 8 year: 2001 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-63 article-title: Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry publication-title: Ethology doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x – volume: 8 start-page: 1 issue: 9 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-22 article-title: Describing temperament in an ungulate: a multidimensional approach publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074579 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-60 article-title: Goats work for food in a contrafreeloading task publication-title: Scientific Reports doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78931-w – volume: 56 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 1998 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-55 article-title: Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review publication-title: Livestock Production Science doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00147-X – volume: 37 start-page: 133 issue: 2 year: 1995 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-31 article-title: Arena behaviour of ewes selected for superior mothering ability differs from that of unselected ewes publication-title: Animal Reproduction Science doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(94)01332-G – volume: 22 start-page: 269 issue: 3−4 year: 1989 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-36 article-title: Individual differences in temperament of dairy goats and the inhibition of milk ejection publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90022-1 – volume: 75 start-page: 251 issue: 1−2 year: 2002 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-41 article-title: Heart rate variability: a noninvasive approach to measure stress in calves and cows publication-title: Physiology & Behavior doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00651-5 – year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-57 article-title: psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA – volume: 11 start-page: 773 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-54 article-title: EasieRR: an open-source software for non-invasive heart rate variability assessment publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13393 – volume: 4 start-page: 431 issue: 8 year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-65 article-title: Novel object test: examining nociception and fear in the rainbow trout publication-title: Journal of Pain doi: 10.1067/S1526-5900(03)00717-X – volume: 5 start-page: 1 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-10 article-title: Stress inoculation modeled in mice publication-title: Translational Psychiatry doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.34 – volume: 105 start-page: 75 issue: 1−3 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-52 article-title: Cognitive enrichment affects behavioural reactivity in domestic pigs publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.016 – volume: 135 start-page: 1 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-2 article-title: Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching publication-title: Animal Behaviour doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.10.001 – volume: 14 start-page: e0221794 issue: 12 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-62 article-title: Effects of breed, management and personality on cortisol reactivity in sport horses publication-title: PLOS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221794 – volume: 144 start-page: 63 issue: 1−2 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-48 article-title: Factors influencing the welfare of goats in small established groups during the separation and reintegration of individuals publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.009 – volume: 16 start-page: e2003693 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-71 article-title: Reproducibility of preclinical animal research improves with heterogeneity of study samples publication-title: PLOS Biology doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003693 – volume: 65 start-page: 451 issue: 5 year: 1963 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-30 article-title: Preference for bar pressing over “freeloading” as a function of number of rewarded presses publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology doi: 10.1037/h0049174 – volume: 8 start-page: 210656 issue: 10 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-59 article-title: Performance of goats in a detour and a problem-solving test following long-term cognitive test exposure publication-title: Royal Society Open Science doi: 10.1098/rsos.210656 – volume: 21 start-page: 384 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-70 article-title: Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation publication-title: Nature Reviews Neuroscience doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0313-3 – volume: 81 start-page: 99 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-26 article-title: Farrowing conditions affect the reactions of piglets towards novel environment and social confrontation at weaning publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00254-X – volume: 5 start-page: 102 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-19 article-title: Personality research in mammalian farm animals: concepts, measures, and relationship to welfare publication-title: Frontiers in Veterinary Science doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00131 – volume: 50 start-page: 346 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-27 article-title: Simultaneous inference in general parametric models publication-title: Biometrical Journal doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4036 – volume: 177 start-page: 34 year: 2016 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-46 article-title: Impact of structural and cognitive enrichment on the learning performance, behavior and physiology of dwarf goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.006 – volume: 46 start-page: 164 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-73 article-title: More than 3Rs: the importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research publication-title: Lab Animal doi: 10.1038/laban.1220 – volume: 85 start-page: 203 issue: 3−4 year: 2004 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-24 article-title: Emotional reactions to learning in cattle publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.007 – volume: 36 start-page: 1323 issue: 5 year: 1988 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-38 article-title: Individual differences in temperament of domestic dairy goats: constancy and change publication-title: Animal Behaviour doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80201-X – volume: 114 start-page: 419 issue: 3−4 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-35 article-title: Effects of age, sex and social isolation on contrafreeloading in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn fowl publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.03.002 – volume: 81 start-page: 39 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-12 article-title: Fearfulness in red junglefowl and domesticated White Leghorn chickens publication-title: Behavioural Processes doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.018 – volume: 67 start-page: 2 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-4 article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 – volume: 101 start-page: 7236 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-68 article-title: Milk yield, quality, and coagulation properties of 6 breeds of goats: environmental and individual variability publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-14111 – volume: 61 start-page: 933 issue: 9 year: 2004 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-47 article-title: Prospective investigation of stress inoculation in young monkeys publication-title: Archives of General Psychiatry doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.933 – volume: 463 start-page: 3 issue: 1−3 year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-51 article-title: The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review publication-title: European Journal of Pharmacology doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01272-X – volume: 16 start-page: 677 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-42 article-title: Taking personality selection bias seriously in animal cognition research: a case study in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) publication-title: Animal Cognition doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0603-5 – volume: 33 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 1992 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-69 article-title: Reactivity of Aubrac heifers exposed to a novel environment alone or in groups of four publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80079-6 – volume: 3 start-page: 1544 issue: 11 year: 2009 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-18 article-title: Genetics of animal temperament: aggressive behaviour at mixing is genetically associated with the response to handling in pigs publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990528 – volume: 121 start-page: 123 issue: 1528 year: 2016 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-43 article-title: Goats learn socially from humans in a spatial problem-solving task publication-title: Animal Behaviour doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.09.004 – volume: 36 start-page: 1696 issue: 6 year: 1988 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-28 article-title: The notion of ethological need, models of motivation and animal welfare publication-title: Animal Behaviour doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80110-6 – volume: 81 start-page: 185 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-25 article-title: Human-animal interactions in livestock production publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0 – volume: 118 start-page: 70 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-75 article-title: Effects of cognitive enrichment on behavioural and physiological reactions of pigs publication-title: Physiology and Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.005 – volume: 271 start-page: 2077 issue: 1552 year: 2004 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-15 article-title: Face pictures reduce behavioural, autonomic, endocrine and neural indices of stress and fear in sheep publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2831 – volume: 9 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-56 article-title: Non-graphical solutions for Cattell’s scree test publication-title: Methodology doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000051 – volume: 131 start-page: 53 issue: 1−2 year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-64 article-title: Degree of social isolation affects behavioural and vocal response patterns in dwarf goats (Capra hircus) publication-title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.003 – volume: 73 start-page: 1231 issue: 12 year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj.12893/ref-74 article-title: Assessing the effects of cognitive experiments on the welfare of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by direct comparison of activity budget between wild and captive chimpanzees publication-title: American Journal of Primatology doi: 10.1002/ajp.20995 |
| SSID | ssj0000826083 |
| Score | 2.2695704 |
| Snippet | Current evidence suggests that frequent exposure to situations in which captive animals can solve cognitive tasks may have positive effects on stress... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e12893 |
| SubjectTerms | Agricultural Science Analysis Animal Behavior Animal cognition Animal handling Animals Batteries Cognitive ability Discrimination, Psychological Female Genetic diversity Goats Goats - physiology Habituation Heart rate Humans Neuropsychological Tests Ontogeny Productivity Reinforcement Reversal Learning Selection for productivity Stress Stress (Psychology) Visual discrimination Visual discrimination learning Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Na9VAEF-kB_Ei1voRbXWFgiCEJtmP7B6rWIpQD2Kht2U_q1KTx3ux-ud3ZpOGFxS89Bayk5DszM7ML5n5LSGHsbVKqMqWtfOp5ALM2Ho4kppzx71SMX_KPvssT8_5pwtxsbXVF9aEjfTA48QdyaR0THDLxikO4EAzVwVVe4e0Ic4H9L4Q87bAVPbBkDVDcjE25LUAWY5WMa7BLwC-YIsQlJn6__bHWwFpWSy5FX1OHpGHU9pIj8fH3SX3YveY3D-bfozvkR9fplrX0XfRPtHQ_0QGDax4CvSyt8OGDrlGdkOvASAD4qdjo0i_3tAE5tD_hjBGr_ruskR_TefKIgrp6EDjn1WPnxOfkPOTj18_nJbTNgqlFy0bSm65ZikI4ZnT-U-orkK0ChKnpEAkSd0K6esgPWRX2ssUJMAIXwsI5oAW2VOy0_VdfE6otw2kNEyFJjY8VMkKFpoUa1WlylkXCvLudmaNnzjGcauLKwNYA9VgshpMVkNBDmfh1Uit8W-x96iiWQT5sPMJsBIzWYn5n5UU5DUq2IzNpfOqNsdtBeGZN1wW5G2WwHUNj-zt1J4AL44MWQvJ_YUkrEe_HL41IjP5g43BtFMoyTgvyJt5GK_EGrcugs5RBruKQQcFeTba3PzSTDCpGKsL0i6scTEry5Hu-7fMFq50y3hbvbiLaXxJHjTY_lHh_n_7ZGdY_4oHkJQN7lVefzdLajmK priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfR1ra9UwNOgG4hfxbefUCANBKGubR9NPssnGEDZkONi30OZxVWZzd299_HzPSXPriuK30pxCmvM-OQ9C9lzdKqGKNi8743MugIxbA0-y4bzjRikXQ9mnZ_Lkgn-4FJcp4LZOaZUbmRgFtQ0GY-T7qLiFkozzd8vrHKdG4e1qGqFxm2yDCFbgfG0fHp19PJ-iLKDgJBgZY2FeDa7L_tK5FcgH8DPYTBXFjv1_y-UbimmeNHlDCx3fJ_eS-UgPRnw_ILdc_5DcOU0X5I_I1_OU8zrKMBo8teEbdtLAzCdLF6Ed1nSIubJr-gMcZfD86VgwElZr6oEswk9QZ_Qq9Isc5TadMowomKUDdb-WAcOKj8nF8dGn9yd5GqeQG1GzIectb5i3QhjWNfFGtCmsaxUYUF4BiJdNLaQprTRgZTVGeivBnTClAKUOXiN7Qrb60LtnhJq2AtOGKVu5itvCt4LZyrtSFb7o2s5m5O3mZLVJvcZx5MWVBp8D0aAjGnREQ0b2JuDl2GLj32CHiKIJBPtixxdhtdCJzbT0qnEeCLDqFAdXsmFdYVVpOmwy0xnY2CtEsB6LTCfu1gd1AWqaV1xm5E2EQP6GLZs2lSnAj2OnrBnk7gwS-NLMlzdEpJNcWOs_VJyR19Myfom5br0DnCMMVhcDDjLydKS56aeZYFIxVmaknlHj7FTmK_2Xz7FruGpqxuti5__bek7uVljgUeCEv12yNay-uxdgdg3dy8RbvwFJwTHb priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Responsiveness of domesticated goats towards various stressors following long-term cognitive test exposure |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368331 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2644586344 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2646941324 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8973470 https://doaj.org/article/6f89efe7a2b8489993b0d81cb1236bcd |
| Volume | 10 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEB9qC6Uv4rfReq5QEITUJPuRzZO00lqEK1I8uLeQ7MdVOZMzl2r9753d5GKjffIlhOwsJDszO7_ZzAfAgUkLyWVUhHGpbMg4inGh8E5kjJVMSWn8Ufb0XJzN2Mc5n2_Bphlnv4DrW107109q1iwPr7__eocKj_j1MEVv5O3KmAZVHl0Hegd20CSlTkOnPc73WzKCaMQaXX7e33P2YJdyKmTXaO6PcfI1_P_dqW-YqnEY5Q27dHoP7vaAkhx1EnAftkz1AHan_S_zh_D1oo-C7XY1Ului62-utoaLhdJkURftmrQ-enZNfqDrXF-tSZdCUjdrYlFQ6p9o4Miyrhah28nJEHNEEKi2xFyvanfQ-Ahmpyef35-FfYOFUPGUtiErWEat5lzRMvP_SLNIm0IipLISSazIUi5UrIVC3JUpYbVAB0PFHM08-pH0MWxXdWWeAlFFgmCHSp2YhOnIFpzqxJpYRjYqi1IH8Gazsrnqq4-7JhjLHL0Qx5HccyT3HAngYCBedUU3bic7diwaSFylbP-gbhZ5r3i5sDIzFkUyKSVD5zKjZaRlrEpXdqZU-GIvHYPzLu100Pf8KI3QcLOEiQBeewong_jKqugTF_DDXe2sEeX-iBI1VY2HN0KUbwQ9d4CUS0EZC-DVMOxmuui3yiDPHY3LN0YeBPCkk7nhozeiG0A6ksbRqoxHqi-Xvo64zFLK0ujZf898DnuJywaJXDvAfdhumyvzAjFaW05g5_jk_NPFxJ9x4PXDPJ54nfwN6KpD8w |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbKVgIuiDeBQo1UhIQUNYkdxzkg1EKrLe2uUNVKvZnEjwVUkmWTUvqn-huZSbKhEYhbb9F6NnI845lv7HkQsmGTTMYyyPww187nMYhxpuFJpJznXEtpm6PsyVSMj_nHk_hkhVwuc2EwrHKpExtFbUqNZ-SbaLhjKRjn7-Y_fOwahberyxYarVjs24tzcNmqt3sfgL-vomh35-j92O-6Cvg6Tljt84ynzJk41ixPm4vBNDA2k4AjnAQSJ9IkFjo0QgPYSLVwRgCq1mEMtg2cJwbvvUFWOQNXZkRWt3emnw77Ux0wqAJATZsImICrtDm3dgH6CPwaNjB9TYeAv-3AFUM4DNK8YvV275I7HVylW6183SMrtrhPbk66C_kH5NthF2Pb6kxaOmrK71i5AyOtDJ2VWV3RuonNrehPcMzLs4q2CSrloqIOxLA8B_NJT8ti5qOdoH1EEwUYXFP7a17iMeZDcnwtC_2IjIqysE8I1VkEUIpJE9mIm8BlMTORs6EMXJBnufHIm-XKKt3VNscWG6cKfBxkg2rYoBo2eGSjJ563JT3-TbaNLOpJsA5380O5mKluWyvhZGodCHyUSw6ua8rywMhQ51jUJtcwsXVksGqTWnttoraSAGABj7jwyOuGAvUJTFlnXVoEfDhW5hpQrg0oQQ_o4fBSiFSnhyr1Z9d45GU_jP_E2LrCAs-RBrOZgQceedzKXP_RLGZCMhZ6JBlI42BVhiPF1y9NlXKZJownwdP_T2ud3BofTQ7Uwd50_xm5HWFySYDdBdfIqF6c2ecA-er8RbfPKPl83Vv7Nx6CbIA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3batRAdKhbKL6Id6PVjlARhLBJ5pLJg0hru7TWLqVY6FtM5rJa2mTdpFZ_za_znCQbGxTf-hYyJ2Fmzn3mXAjZtHGmhAoyP8y187kAMs40PMmE85xrpWxzlH04lXsn_MOpOF0hv5a5MBhWuZSJjaA2pcYz8jEqbqEk43zsurCIo53Ju_k3HztI4U3rsp1GSyIH9ucVuG_V2_0dwPWrKJrsfnq_53cdBnwtYlb7POMJc0YIzfKkuSRMAmMzBTaFUwDiZBILqUMjNRgeiZbOSLCwdShAz4EjxeC_t8hqDF5RMCKr27vTo-P-hAeUqwQDp00KjMFtGs-tXYBsAh-HDdRg0y3gb51wTSkOAzavacDJXXKnM13pVktr98iKLe6TtcPucv4BOTvu4m1b-UlLR015gVU8MOrK0FmZ1RWtmzjdin4HJ728rGibrFIuKuqAJMsrUKX0vCxmPuoM2kc3UTCJa2p_zEs80nxITm5kox-RUVEW9gmhOovArGLKRDbiJnCZYCZyNlSBC_IsNx55s9zZVHd1zrHdxnkK_g6iIW3QkDZo8MhmDzxvy3v8G2wbUdSDYE3u5kW5mKUdi6fSqcQ6IP4oVxzc2ITlgVGhzrHATa5hYhuI4LRNcO0lS7oVB2Ai8IhLj7xuIFC2wJR11qVIwMKxStcAcn0ACTJBD4eXRJR2MqlK_3CQR172w_glxtkVFnCOMJjZDDjwyOOW5vpFM8GkYiz0SDygxsGuDEeKr1-aiuUqiRmPg6f_n9YGWQOWTj_uTw-ekdsR5pkE2GhwnYzqxaV9DtZfnb_o2IySzzfN2b8B_jdwtQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responsiveness+of+domesticated+goats+towards+various+stressors+following+long-term+cognitive+test+exposure&rft.jtitle=PeerJ+%28San+Francisco%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Rosenberger%2C+Katrina&rft.au=Simmler%2C+Michael&rft.au=Langbein%2C+Jan&rft.au=Nawroth%2C+Christian&rft.date=2022-03-29&rft.pub=PeerJ+Inc&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft.volume=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717%2Fpeerj.12893&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35368331&rft.externalDocID=PMC8973470 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2167-8359&client=summon |