Comparative evaluation of four SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in hospitalized patients
•SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a corner...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of infectious diseases Vol. 105; pp. 144 - 146 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Elsevier Ltd
01.04.2021
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | •SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious.
Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity.
We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases.
Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objectives: Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity. Results: We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct ≤ 25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct ≤ 30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Conclusion: Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity. We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness. •SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity. We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.OBJECTIVESRapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity.METHODSWe analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity.We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases.RESULTSWe found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases.Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.CONCLUSIONMost antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness. |
Author | Öttl, Karla-Wanda Thommes, Lis Theurl, Igor Lanser, Lukas Burkert, Francesco Robert Griesmacher, Andrea Weiss, Günter Loacker, Lorin Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa Goldin, David |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lis orcidid: 0000-0001-8516-2508 surname: Thommes fullname: Thommes, Lis organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 2 givenname: Francesco Robert orcidid: 0000-0002-3802-2526 surname: Burkert fullname: Burkert, Francesco Robert organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 3 givenname: Karla-Wanda surname: Öttl fullname: Öttl, Karla-Wanda organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 4 givenname: David orcidid: 0000-0002-9942-9100 surname: Goldin fullname: Goldin, David organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 5 givenname: Lorin surname: Loacker fullname: Loacker, Lorin organization: Central Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnosis, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 6 givenname: Lukas orcidid: 0000-0001-7849-2971 surname: Lanser fullname: Lanser, Lukas organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 7 givenname: Andrea surname: Griesmacher fullname: Griesmacher, Andrea organization: Central Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnosis, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 8 givenname: Igor surname: Theurl fullname: Theurl, Igor organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 9 givenname: Günter surname: Weiss fullname: Weiss, Günter email: guenter.weiss@i-med.ac.at organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria – sequence: 10 givenname: Rosa orcidid: 0000-0002-5584-111X surname: Bellmann-Weiler fullname: Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa email: rosa.bellmann-weiler@i-med.ac.at organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkU1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAOXJJ8GfsIIRUraBUqgSiwNWaOOOtl2y82NmVyq-vw5aK9lBOtux53hn7OS4OxjBiUbykpKaENm9WtV_5vmaE0Zqwmkj2pDiiWumKS0oP8p4RWrWKssPiOKUVIUQ0jX5WHHLekFYpcVR8WYT1BiJMfocl7mDY5m0Yy-BKF7axvDz9elktwo-KlTBOfoljOWGaUunH8iqkjZ9g8L-xLzeZw3FKz4unDoaEL27Xk-L7xw_fFp-qi89n54vTi8pKxaZKtMCgc1IDoFKcqF503PXSAaGybWgntHNopRPESS56KkBrprgC4RRtND8pzve5fYCV2US_hnhtAnjz5yDEpYE4eTugaRRir2kjeaOEJBw6wntqrW4pglMkZ73fZ2223Rp7m98RYbgXev9m9FdmGXZGaa3bVuSA17cBMfza5v8xa58sDgOMGLbJMNHSVpKGznO_-rfXXZO_SnIB2xfYGFKK6O5KKDGzd7Mys3czezeEmew9Q_oBZLOZ2WSe1w-Po-_2KGZbO4_RJJtNWux9RDvl7_SP428f4Hbwo7cw_MTr_8E3KTDcNg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_hsr2_811 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41392_021_00731_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2022_100403 crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013705_pub3 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13020210 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_81849 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_761887 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jviromet_2021_114299 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18137037 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojepi_2022_124032 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003735 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11112105 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12061388 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms12010180 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0317213 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9245248 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10096_021_04274_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10096_024_04788_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmi_2023_04_019 |
Cites_doi | 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc1931 10.3390/microorganisms9010058 10.1146/annurev-virology-012420-022445 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03235.x 10.1128/JCM.00977-20 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 The Authors Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. 2021 The Authors 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Authors – notice: Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. – notice: 2021 The Authors 2021 |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ : directory of open access journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
EISSN | 1878-3511 |
EndPage | 146 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70 PMC7888994 33609774 10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052 S1201971221001387 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1~. 1~5 29J 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FQ 8R4 8R5 AAEDW AAFWJ AAIKJ AALRI AAQFI AAQXK AARKO AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFRF ABMAC ABUWG ABWVN ACGFO ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AEXQZ AFJKZ AFKRA AFPKN AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGEKW AGHFR AGQPQ AGYEJ AHMBA AIGII AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BR6 BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FNPLU FYUFA G-Q GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ IHE IXB J1W KQ8 M1P M3C M3G M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OD- OK1 OO. OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO Q2X Q38 QTD R2- ROL RPZ RWL RXW SDF SDG SEL SES SEW SSZ TAE UKHRP UNMZH Z5R 0SF 3V. 6I. AACTN AAFTH ABVKL AFCTW NCXOZ RIG AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-49a2abf58aae77307d4b3fd5fa015961b48ffec5f40f534d14a882737a4f71683 |
IEDL.DBID | IXB |
ISSN | 1201-9712 1878-3511 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:11 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:57:24 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:32:52 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:30:05 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:44:17 EST 2024 Tue Aug 26 16:32:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | COVID-19 Antigen test SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity RT-PCR Ct values |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c572t-49a2abf58aae77307d4b3fd5fa015961b48ffec5f40f534d14a882737a4f71683 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-9942-9100 0000-0002-3802-2526 0000-0001-7849-2971 0000-0001-8516-2508 0000-0002-5584-111X |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221001387 |
PMID | 33609774 |
PQID | 2491950618 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 3 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7888994 proquest_miscellaneous_2491950618 pubmed_primary_33609774 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Canada |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada |
PublicationTitle | International journal of infectious diseases |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Infect Dis |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases – name: Elsevier |
References | World Health O (bib0060) 2020 Bellmann-Weiler, Beikircher, Kurz, Theurl, Weiss (bib0010) 2011; 17 Buchta, Görzer, Chiba, Camp, Holzmann, Puchhammer-Stöckl (bib0015) 2020 Albert, Torres, Bueno, Huntley, Molla, Fernández-Fuentes (bib0005) 2020 Strömer, Rose, Schäfer, Schön, Vollersen, Lorentz (bib0050) 2020; 9 Laferl, Kelani, Seitz, Holzer, Zimpernik, Steinrigl (bib0025) 2020 Olearo, Nörz, Heinrich, Sutter, Rödel, Schultze (bib0045) 2020 Weissleder, Lee, Ko, Pittet (bib0055) 2020; 12 Diao, Wen, Zhang, Chen, Han, Chen (bib0020) 2020 Lanser, Bellmann-Weiler, Öttl, Huber, Griesmacher, Theurl (bib0035) 2020 Moriyama, Hugentobler, Iwasaki (bib0040) 2020; 7 Lambert-Niclot, Cuffel, Le Pape, Vauloup-Fellous, Morand-Joubert, Roque-Afonso (bib0030) 2020; 58 Bellmann-Weiler (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0010) 2011; 17 Laferl (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0025) 2020 Strömer (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0050) 2020; 9 Diao (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0020) 2020 Lambert-Niclot (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0030) 2020; 58 Olearo (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0045) 2020 Lanser (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0035) 2020 Moriyama (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0040) 2020; 7 World Health O (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0060) 2020 Weissleder (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0055) 2020; 12 Albert (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0005) 2020 Buchta (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0015) 2020 |
References_xml | – volume: 9 year: 2020 ident: bib0050 article-title: Performance of a point-of-care test for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen publication-title: Microorganisms – year: 2020 ident: bib0015 publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med – year: 2020 ident: bib0005 article-title: Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect – year: 2020 ident: bib0025 article-title: An approach to lifting self-isolation for health care workers with prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA publication-title: Infection – volume: 17 start-page: 235 year: 2011 end-page: 237 ident: bib0010 article-title: Accuracy of bedside antigen tests in the diagnosis of new influenza A/H1N1v infection publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect – year: 2020 ident: bib0035 article-title: Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values publication-title: Infection – year: 2020 ident: bib0020 article-title: Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clinl Microbiol Infect Dis – volume: 58 year: 2020 ident: bib0030 article-title: Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal swabs publication-title: J Clin Microbiol – year: 2020 ident: bib0060 article-title: Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays: interim guidance, 11 September 2020 – year: 2020 ident: bib0045 article-title: Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR publication-title: medRxiv – volume: 12 year: 2020 ident: bib0055 article-title: COVID-19 diagnostics in context publication-title: Sci Transl Med – volume: 7 start-page: 83 year: 2020 end-page: 101 ident: bib0040 article-title: Seasonality of respiratory viral infections publication-title: Annu Rev Virol – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0035 article-title: Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values publication-title: Infection – volume: 12 issue: 546 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0055 article-title: COVID-19 diagnostics in context publication-title: Sci Transl Med doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc1931 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0005 article-title: Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect – volume: 9 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0050 article-title: Performance of a point-of-care test for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen publication-title: Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010058 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0020 article-title: Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clinl Microbiol Infect Dis – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0025 article-title: An approach to lifting self-isolation for health care workers with prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA publication-title: Infection – volume: 7 start-page: 83 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0040 article-title: Seasonality of respiratory viral infections publication-title: Annu Rev Virol doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-012420-022445 – volume: 17 start-page: 235 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0010 article-title: Accuracy of bedside antigen tests in the diagnosis of new influenza A/H1N1v infection publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03235.x – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0045 article-title: Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR publication-title: medRxiv – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0015 publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med – volume: 58 issue: 8 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0030 article-title: Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal swabs publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.00977-20 – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0060 |
SSID | ssj0004668 |
Score | 2.3958569 |
Snippet | •SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19... Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests... Objectives: Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 144 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antigen test Antigens, Viral - analysis COVID-19 COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing COVID-19 Serological Testing Ct values Female Hospitalization Humans Infectivity Male Middle Aged Nasopharynx - virology RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 - immunology Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ : directory of open access journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEB-kBxFEtH6tX0TwJsHNd_ZYH5YiVMRa6S0kuwndUvaJ7_XSv77JJrvtKrQXr7ubLJmZZH5JZn4D8EHqOjjrGNaON5hL12EnacDKUmeD8K1vUr7z4Td5cMy_noiTG6W-UkxYpgfOgvskVVzFNZGCScVFzayrWUfaVjfE26DG3Xr0edNmas6IzElw0b3hRhFa0mVyZFd_1ieOUJrZOgVduKSRuX_hmf5Fnn8HUN7wSPuP4VGBkmgvD-EJ3PPDLtw_LJflu_AwH8mhnGn0FL6vrpm-0TXLN1oHFGJf6GjvxxFerX9hiqK4E0snijh0u0H9gE5LeZH-0neocLFunsHx_pefqwNcCirgVii6xbyx1LogtLVexamtOu5Y6ESwERQ0kjiuUxCJCLwOgvGOcBsBuGLK8hD3VZo9h51hPfiXgLQObSdJqLXzPAhnVaBMdMFTqS1vRQVkkqlpC9t4KnpxbqawsjOT9GCSHkxNTdRDBR_nNr8z18atX39Oqpq_TDzZ44NoPaZYj7nLeipgk6LNlIoaF8_YUX_rr8XcqgCVDEDubPd-siUTZ3G6mrGDX19sTNwEp3q8kugKXmTbmgfGmKwTSq9ALaxuMfLlm6E_HZnC0_lG0_BX_0NUr-FBGkqOWnoDO9s_F_5tBGRb926ce1d7HDI9 priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Comparative evaluation of four SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in hospitalized patients |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1201971221001387 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609774 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2491950618 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7888994 https://doaj.org/article/67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70 |
Volume | 105 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbxQhFCe1B2NijNav8WODiTeDO3wzx3Zj02hq1LVmbwRmwE5jZpru9uLBv10YmG1Hk5p4mWQYYID3gAe83w8AXgtVemssRcqyCjFhG2QF8UgaYo3nrnZVxDsffxRHJ-z9iq92wGLEwkS3yjz2pzF9GK1zyDy35vy8bedLHOauSmJC8HDcFhHllKkBxLc6uIaNTHC4EBnF2Bk4k3y82rM2soWSxNvJyWRyGjj8J3PU3zbon66U1-amw_vgXjYq4X4q9wOw47o9cPs4H5vvgbtpcw4mzNFD8GlxxfkNr_i-Ye-hD3nB5f6XJVr03xCBoeEjXycMFulmDdsOnuaLRtqfroGZlXX9CJwcvvu6OEL5agVUc0k2iFWGGOu5MsbJ0Mllwyz1DfcmmAeVwJap6E7CPSs9p6zBzARTXFJpmA8rLEUfg92u79xTAJXydSOwL5V1zHNrpCeUN94RoQyreQHw2Ka6zrzj8fqLH3p0MDvTUQ46ykGXRAc5FODNNs15Yt24MfZBFNU2ZmTMHgL6i-86q4wWMlgDCgtOhWS8pMaWtMF1rSrsjJdlAegoaD2CUsMwGjJqb_w136aaqO0_070adUmH_hwPaUzn-su1DsvheDOvwKoAT5JubStGqSijvV4AOdG6Sc2nX7r2dOAMjzsdVcWe_Wd5n4M78S25LL0Au5uLS_cyWGMbOwO33v7Cs2EvYzZ0vfD88Fn9BsACNbg |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKkQAJISgUwtNI3JC18ds5tiuqLXQrxLZob5ad2DQVSqru9sKvx06cbQNSkbjGj9iesf3ZnvkGgA9C5d4aS5GyrEBM2ApZQTyShljjuStdEf2d58didso-L_lyC0wHX5hoVpnW_n5N71br9GWSRnNyUdeTBQ57VyExIbh7bpN3wN2ABmSM33C43L_hHNn7w4XcKGZPnjO9kVd9Xke6UNITd3Iy2p06Ev_RJvU3CP3TlvLG5nTwGDxKqBLu9Q1_ArZcswPuzdO7-Q542N_Owd7p6Cn4Or0m_YbXhN-w9dCHuuBi79sCTdvviMAw8pGwEwZIul7BuoFnKdJI_ctVMNGyrp6B04NPJ9MZSrEVUMklWSNWGGKs58oYJ8MslxWz1Ffcm4APCoEtU9GehHuWe05ZhZkJWFxSaZgPRyxFd8F20zbuBYBK-bIS2OfKOua5NdITyivviFCGlTwDeBhTXSbi8Rj_4qceLMzOdZSDjnLQOdFBDhn4uClz0dNu3Jp7P4pqkzNSZncf2ssfOumMFjLAAYUFp0IynlNjc1rhslQFdsbLPAN0ELQevFLDOhoqqm_9Nd-UGuntP8u9H3RJhwkdX2lM49qrlQ7n4RiaV2CVgee9bm06RqnII2DPgBxp3ajn45SmPutIw-NVR1Gwl__Z3nfg_uxkfqSPDo-_vAIPYkpvv_QabK8vr9ybAM3W9m039X4Ddj017w |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+evaluation+of+four+SARS-CoV-2+antigen+tests+in+hospitalized+patients&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+infectious+diseases&rft.au=Thommes%2C+Lis&rft.au=Burkert%2C+Francesco+Robert&rft.au=%C3%96ttl%2C+Karla-Wanda&rft.au=Goldin%2C+David&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=1878-3511&rft.eissn=1878-3511&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijid.2021.02.052&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon |