Comparative evaluation of four SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in hospitalized patients

•SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a corner...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of infectious diseases Vol. 105; pp. 144 - 146
Main Authors Thommes, Lis, Burkert, Francesco Robert, Öttl, Karla-Wanda, Goldin, David, Loacker, Lorin, Lanser, Lukas, Griesmacher, Andrea, Theurl, Igor, Weiss, Günter, Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2021
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract •SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity. We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.
AbstractList Objectives: Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods: We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity. Results: We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct ≤ 25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct ≤ 30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Conclusion: Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.
Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity. We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.
•SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19 patients.•Antigen tests can stay positive after patients are no longer considered contagious. Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients’ infectivity. We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases. Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.
Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.OBJECTIVESRapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests can provide timely results, which is of particular importance in a primary care setting. However, concerns exist regarding their sensitivity, which led us to evaluate four commercially available tests in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.We analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity.METHODSWe analyzed in parallel nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from 154 consecutive patients admitted to our department with moderate to severe COVID-19, using quantitative RT-PCR (Cobas, Roche) and up to four antigen tests from different distributors. Antigen test results were linked to Ct (cycle threshold) values as markers for patients' infectivity.We found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases.RESULTSWe found that two out of four antigen tests correctly identified subjects with high viral loads (Ct≤25), and three out of four tests detected more than 80% of subjects with a Ct≤30, which is considered the threshold for infectivity. However, one test investigated had a poor clinical performance. When investigating subjects with Ct values >30, we found that the antigen test was still positive in up to 45% of those cases.Most antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.CONCLUSIONMost antigen tests had a sufficient sensitivity to identify symptomatic subjects infected with SARS-CoV-2 and with transmissible infection. On the other hand, antigen testing may not be suitable to identify loss of infectivity in COVID-19 subjects during follow-up. Newly introduced antigen tests need to be validated in a clinical or primary care setting to define their clinical usefulness.
Author Öttl, Karla-Wanda
Thommes, Lis
Theurl, Igor
Lanser, Lukas
Burkert, Francesco Robert
Griesmacher, Andrea
Weiss, Günter
Loacker, Lorin
Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa
Goldin, David
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lis
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8516-2508
  surname: Thommes
  fullname: Thommes, Lis
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Francesco Robert
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3802-2526
  surname: Burkert
  fullname: Burkert, Francesco Robert
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Karla-Wanda
  surname: Öttl
  fullname: Öttl, Karla-Wanda
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9942-9100
  surname: Goldin
  fullname: Goldin, David
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lorin
  surname: Loacker
  fullname: Loacker, Lorin
  organization: Central Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnosis, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lukas
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7849-2971
  surname: Lanser
  fullname: Lanser, Lukas
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Andrea
  surname: Griesmacher
  fullname: Griesmacher, Andrea
  organization: Central Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnosis, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Igor
  surname: Theurl
  fullname: Theurl, Igor
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Günter
  surname: Weiss
  fullname: Weiss, Günter
  email: guenter.weiss@i-med.ac.at
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Rosa
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5584-111X
  surname: Bellmann-Weiler
  fullname: Bellmann-Weiler, Rosa
  email: rosa.bellmann-weiler@i-med.ac.at
  organization: Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Disease, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pneumology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1v1DAQhiNURD_gD3BAOXJJ8GfsIIRUraBUqgSiwNWaOOOtl2y82NmVyq-vw5aK9lBOtux53hn7OS4OxjBiUbykpKaENm9WtV_5vmaE0Zqwmkj2pDiiWumKS0oP8p4RWrWKssPiOKUVIUQ0jX5WHHLekFYpcVR8WYT1BiJMfocl7mDY5m0Yy-BKF7axvDz9elktwo-KlTBOfoljOWGaUunH8iqkjZ9g8L-xLzeZw3FKz4unDoaEL27Xk-L7xw_fFp-qi89n54vTi8pKxaZKtMCgc1IDoFKcqF503PXSAaGybWgntHNopRPESS56KkBrprgC4RRtND8pzve5fYCV2US_hnhtAnjz5yDEpYE4eTugaRRir2kjeaOEJBw6wntqrW4pglMkZ73fZ2223Rp7m98RYbgXev9m9FdmGXZGaa3bVuSA17cBMfza5v8xa58sDgOMGLbJMNHSVpKGznO_-rfXXZO_SnIB2xfYGFKK6O5KKDGzd7Mys3czezeEmew9Q_oBZLOZ2WSe1w-Po-_2KGZbO4_RJJtNWux9RDvl7_SP428f4Hbwo7cw_MTr_8E3KTDcNg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_hsr2_811
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41392_021_00731_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2022_100403
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD013705_pub3
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13020210
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_81849
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_761887
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jviromet_2021_114299
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18137037
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojepi_2022_124032
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pmed_1003735
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11112105
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12061388
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms12010180
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0317213
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9245248
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10096_021_04274_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10096_024_04788_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmi_2023_04_019
Cites_doi 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc1931
10.3390/microorganisms9010058
10.1146/annurev-virology-012420-022445
10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03235.x
10.1128/JCM.00977-20
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 The Authors
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
2021 The Authors 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2021 The Authors 2021
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ : directory of open access journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1878-3511
EndPage 146
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70
PMC7888994
33609774
10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052
S1201971221001387
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
29J
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
7X7
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FQ
8R4
8R5
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AARKO
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFRF
ABMAC
ABUWG
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGEKW
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGYEJ
AHMBA
AIGII
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BPHCQ
BR6
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FNPLU
FYUFA
G-Q
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IXB
J1W
KQ8
M1P
M3C
M3G
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OD-
OK1
OO.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q2X
Q38
QTD
R2-
ROL
RPZ
RWL
RXW
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
TAE
UKHRP
UNMZH
Z5R
0SF
3V.
6I.
AACTN
AAFTH
ABVKL
AFCTW
NCXOZ
RIG
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-49a2abf58aae77307d4b3fd5fa015961b48ffec5f40f534d14a882737a4f71683
IEDL.DBID IXB
ISSN 1201-9712
1878-3511
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:29:11 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:57:24 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:32:52 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:01:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:30:05 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:44:17 EST 2024
Tue Aug 26 16:32:03 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords COVID-19
Antigen test
SARS-CoV-2
Infectivity
RT-PCR
Ct values
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c572t-49a2abf58aae77307d4b3fd5fa015961b48ffec5f40f534d14a882737a4f71683
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9942-9100
0000-0002-3802-2526
0000-0001-7849-2971
0000-0001-8516-2508
0000-0002-5584-111X
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221001387
PMID 33609774
PQID 2491950618
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 3
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7888994
proquest_miscellaneous_2491950618
pubmed_primary_33609774
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijid_2021_02_052
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
PublicationTitle International journal of infectious diseases
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Infect Dis
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases
– name: Elsevier
References World Health O (bib0060) 2020
Bellmann-Weiler, Beikircher, Kurz, Theurl, Weiss (bib0010) 2011; 17
Buchta, Görzer, Chiba, Camp, Holzmann, Puchhammer-Stöckl (bib0015) 2020
Albert, Torres, Bueno, Huntley, Molla, Fernández-Fuentes (bib0005) 2020
Strömer, Rose, Schäfer, Schön, Vollersen, Lorentz (bib0050) 2020; 9
Laferl, Kelani, Seitz, Holzer, Zimpernik, Steinrigl (bib0025) 2020
Olearo, Nörz, Heinrich, Sutter, Rödel, Schultze (bib0045) 2020
Weissleder, Lee, Ko, Pittet (bib0055) 2020; 12
Diao, Wen, Zhang, Chen, Han, Chen (bib0020) 2020
Lanser, Bellmann-Weiler, Öttl, Huber, Griesmacher, Theurl (bib0035) 2020
Moriyama, Hugentobler, Iwasaki (bib0040) 2020; 7
Lambert-Niclot, Cuffel, Le Pape, Vauloup-Fellous, Morand-Joubert, Roque-Afonso (bib0030) 2020; 58
Bellmann-Weiler (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0010) 2011; 17
Laferl (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0025) 2020
Strömer (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0050) 2020; 9
Diao (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0020) 2020
Lambert-Niclot (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0030) 2020; 58
Olearo (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0045) 2020
Lanser (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0035) 2020
Moriyama (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0040) 2020; 7
World Health O (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0060) 2020
Weissleder (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0055) 2020; 12
Albert (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0005) 2020
Buchta (10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0015) 2020
References_xml – volume: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0050
  article-title: Performance of a point-of-care test for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen
  publication-title: Microorganisms
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0015
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: An approach to lifting self-isolation for health care workers with prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
  publication-title: Infection
– volume: 17
  start-page: 235
  year: 2011
  end-page: 237
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Accuracy of bedside antigen tests in the diagnosis of new influenza A/H1N1v infection
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values
  publication-title: Infection
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clinl Microbiol Infect Dis
– volume: 58
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal swabs
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0060
  article-title: Antigen-detection in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection using rapid immunoassays: interim guidance, 11 September 2020
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0045
  article-title: Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR
  publication-title: medRxiv
– volume: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0055
  article-title: COVID-19 diagnostics in context
  publication-title: Sci Transl Med
– volume: 7
  start-page: 83
  year: 2020
  end-page: 101
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Seasonality of respiratory viral infections
  publication-title: Annu Rev Virol
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0035
  article-title: Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values
  publication-title: Infection
– volume: 12
  issue: 546
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0055
  article-title: COVID-19 diagnostics in context
  publication-title: Sci Transl Med
  doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc1931
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0005
  article-title: Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
– volume: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0050
  article-title: Performance of a point-of-care test for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen
  publication-title: Microorganisms
  doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010058
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0020
  article-title: Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clinl Microbiol Infect Dis
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0025
  article-title: An approach to lifting self-isolation for health care workers with prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
  publication-title: Infection
– volume: 7
  start-page: 83
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0040
  article-title: Seasonality of respiratory viral infections
  publication-title: Annu Rev Virol
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-012420-022445
– volume: 17
  start-page: 235
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0010
  article-title: Accuracy of bedside antigen tests in the diagnosis of new influenza A/H1N1v infection
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Infect
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03235.x
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0045
  article-title: Handling and accuracy of four rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR
  publication-title: medRxiv
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0015
  publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med
– volume: 58
  issue: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0030
  article-title: Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal swabs
  publication-title: J Clin Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/JCM.00977-20
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052_bib0060
SSID ssj0004668
Score 2.3958569
Snippet •SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests allow rapid identification of symptomatic subjects.•Out of four antigen tests, one showed insufficient sensitivity in COVID-19...
Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle antigen tests...
Objectives: Rapid identification of infected subjects is a cornerstone for controlling a pandemic like the current one with the SARS-CoV-2. Easy to handle...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 144
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigen test
Antigens, Viral - analysis
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
COVID-19 Serological Testing
Ct values
Female
Hospitalization
Humans
Infectivity
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharynx - virology
RT-PCR
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 - immunology
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ : directory of open access journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEB-kBxFEtH6tX0TwJsHNd_ZYH5YiVMRa6S0kuwndUvaJ7_XSv77JJrvtKrQXr7ubLJmZZH5JZn4D8EHqOjjrGNaON5hL12EnacDKUmeD8K1vUr7z4Td5cMy_noiTG6W-UkxYpgfOgvskVVzFNZGCScVFzayrWUfaVjfE26DG3Xr0edNmas6IzElw0b3hRhFa0mVyZFd_1ieOUJrZOgVduKSRuX_hmf5Fnn8HUN7wSPuP4VGBkmgvD-EJ3PPDLtw_LJflu_AwH8mhnGn0FL6vrpm-0TXLN1oHFGJf6GjvxxFerX9hiqK4E0snijh0u0H9gE5LeZH-0neocLFunsHx_pefqwNcCirgVii6xbyx1LogtLVexamtOu5Y6ESwERQ0kjiuUxCJCLwOgvGOcBsBuGLK8hD3VZo9h51hPfiXgLQObSdJqLXzPAhnVaBMdMFTqS1vRQVkkqlpC9t4KnpxbqawsjOT9GCSHkxNTdRDBR_nNr8z18atX39Oqpq_TDzZ44NoPaZYj7nLeipgk6LNlIoaF8_YUX_rr8XcqgCVDEDubPd-siUTZ3G6mrGDX19sTNwEp3q8kugKXmTbmgfGmKwTSq9ALaxuMfLlm6E_HZnC0_lG0_BX_0NUr-FBGkqOWnoDO9s_F_5tBGRb926ce1d7HDI9
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Comparative evaluation of four SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in hospitalized patients
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1201971221001387
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33609774
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2491950618
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7888994
https://doaj.org/article/67eed81653674503ab03d1cc891eaf70
Volume 105
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbxQhFCe1B2NijNav8WODiTeDO3wzx3Zj02hq1LVmbwRmwE5jZpru9uLBv10YmG1Hk5p4mWQYYID3gAe83w8AXgtVemssRcqyCjFhG2QF8UgaYo3nrnZVxDsffxRHJ-z9iq92wGLEwkS3yjz2pzF9GK1zyDy35vy8bedLHOauSmJC8HDcFhHllKkBxLc6uIaNTHC4EBnF2Bk4k3y82rM2soWSxNvJyWRyGjj8J3PU3zbon66U1-amw_vgXjYq4X4q9wOw47o9cPs4H5vvgbtpcw4mzNFD8GlxxfkNr_i-Ye-hD3nB5f6XJVr03xCBoeEjXycMFulmDdsOnuaLRtqfroGZlXX9CJwcvvu6OEL5agVUc0k2iFWGGOu5MsbJ0Mllwyz1DfcmmAeVwJap6E7CPSs9p6zBzARTXFJpmA8rLEUfg92u79xTAJXydSOwL5V1zHNrpCeUN94RoQyreQHw2Ka6zrzj8fqLH3p0MDvTUQ46ykGXRAc5FODNNs15Yt24MfZBFNU2ZmTMHgL6i-86q4wWMlgDCgtOhWS8pMaWtMF1rSrsjJdlAegoaD2CUsMwGjJqb_w136aaqO0_070adUmH_hwPaUzn-su1DsvheDOvwKoAT5JubStGqSijvV4AOdG6Sc2nX7r2dOAMjzsdVcWe_Wd5n4M78S25LL0Au5uLS_cyWGMbOwO33v7Cs2EvYzZ0vfD88Fn9BsACNbg
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKkQAJISgUwtNI3JC18ds5tiuqLXQrxLZob5ad2DQVSqru9sKvx06cbQNSkbjGj9iesf3ZnvkGgA9C5d4aS5GyrEBM2ApZQTyShljjuStdEf2d58didso-L_lyC0wHX5hoVpnW_n5N71br9GWSRnNyUdeTBQ57VyExIbh7bpN3wN2ABmSM33C43L_hHNn7w4XcKGZPnjO9kVd9Xke6UNITd3Iy2p06Ev_RJvU3CP3TlvLG5nTwGDxKqBLu9Q1_ArZcswPuzdO7-Q542N_Owd7p6Cn4Or0m_YbXhN-w9dCHuuBi79sCTdvviMAw8pGwEwZIul7BuoFnKdJI_ctVMNGyrp6B04NPJ9MZSrEVUMklWSNWGGKs58oYJ8MslxWz1Ffcm4APCoEtU9GehHuWe05ZhZkJWFxSaZgPRyxFd8F20zbuBYBK-bIS2OfKOua5NdITyivviFCGlTwDeBhTXSbi8Rj_4qceLMzOdZSDjnLQOdFBDhn4uClz0dNu3Jp7P4pqkzNSZncf2ssfOumMFjLAAYUFp0IynlNjc1rhslQFdsbLPAN0ELQevFLDOhoqqm_9Nd-UGuntP8u9H3RJhwkdX2lM49qrlQ7n4RiaV2CVgee9bm06RqnII2DPgBxp3ajn45SmPutIw-NVR1Gwl__Z3nfg_uxkfqSPDo-_vAIPYkpvv_QabK8vr9ybAM3W9m039X4Ddj017w
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+evaluation+of+four+SARS-CoV-2+antigen+tests+in+hospitalized+patients&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+infectious+diseases&rft.au=Thommes%2C+Lis&rft.au=Burkert%2C+Francesco+Robert&rft.au=%C3%96ttl%2C+Karla-Wanda&rft.au=Goldin%2C+David&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=1878-3511&rft.eissn=1878-3511&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=144&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijid.2021.02.052&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1201-9712&client=summon