Comparison of malignancy and spatial distribution between latent and clinical prostate cancer: an 8-year biopsy study
Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consisten...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of medical research Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 1 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
10.09.2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria. Methods Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant. Results In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, 12.5% had tumor volume [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3. Conclusion The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. Keywords: Autopsy, Latent cancer, Prostate cancer, Spatial distribution, Malignancy |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria. Methods Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant. Results In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, 12.5% had tumor volume [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3. Conclusion The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. Keywords: Autopsy, Latent cancer, Prostate cancer, Spatial distribution, Malignancy Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria. Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant. In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, 12.5% had tumor volume [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP [greater than or equal to] 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of [greater than or equal to] 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3. The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. Abstract Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria. Methods Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant. Results In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, 12.5% had tumor volume ≥ 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of ≥ 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3. Conclusion The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria. Methods Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant. Results In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, 12.5% had tumor volume ≥ 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of ≥ 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3. Conclusion The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria.BACKGROUNDCurrent prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the tumor pathological origin of latent prostate cancer (lPCa) and clinical prostate cancer (cPCa) are consistent, and to verify the current clinically significant prostate cancer criteria.Prostate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant.METHODSProstate specimens were obtained from postmortem autopsy between 2014 and 2021 and patients who went through radical prostatectomy from 2013 to 2021. The pathological characteristics and spatial distribution of the lPCa group and cPCa group were compared and analyzed through SPSS software with P < 0.05 representing statistical significant.In lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, 12.5% had tumor volume ≥ 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of ≥ 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3.RESULTSIn lPCa group, a total of 45 tumor lesions from 24 lPCa cases were included, 54.2% of lPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, 12.5% had tumor volume ≥ 0.5 ml, and 16.7% had extraprostatic extension (EPE). In cPCa group, there were a total of 429 tumor lesions in 126 cases, 92.1% of cPCa patients were ISUP ≥ 2, and 82.5% had tumor volume of ≥ 0.5 ml. 36.3% had EPE. LPCa and cPCa have the same spatial distribution characteristics, and no significant difference was detected between the anterior and posterior zone. Peripheral zone tumors were significantly more common than transitional zone tumors. Tumors in apical 1/3 and middle 1/3 were significantly more common than basal 1/3.The malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor.CONCLUSIONThe malignancy of cPCa is significantly higher than that of lPCa, and the spatial distribution of cPCa and lPCa is consistent. ISUP grade 2 is not sufficient to determine clinical significance of tumor. |
ArticleNumber | 175 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Yuliang, Chen Yi, Zhou Xingcheng, Wu Wenze, Wang Weigang, Yan Zhen, Liang Zhien, Zhou Hanzi, Huang Yu, Xiao Yuzhi, Zuo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Liang surname: Zhen fullname: Zhen, Liang – sequence: 2 givenname: Zhou surname: Zhien fullname: Zhien, Zhou – sequence: 3 givenname: Huang surname: Hanzi fullname: Hanzi, Huang – sequence: 4 givenname: Wu surname: Xingcheng fullname: Xingcheng, Wu – sequence: 5 givenname: Xiao surname: Yu fullname: Yu, Xiao – sequence: 6 givenname: Wang surname: Wenze fullname: Wenze, Wang – sequence: 7 givenname: Zuo surname: Yuzhi fullname: Yuzhi, Zuo – sequence: 8 givenname: Chen surname: Yuliang fullname: Yuliang, Chen – sequence: 9 givenname: Zhou surname: Yi fullname: Yi, Zhou – sequence: 10 givenname: Yan surname: Weigang fullname: Weigang, Yan |
BookMark | eNp9kktr3DAUhU1JadI0f6ArQ6F041QvW3IXhTD0EQh0k0V34lqPGQ2y5Ep2y_z7amZSmgmlaCFx9Z1zke55WZ2FGExVvcboGmPRvc8MIYQbREiDkNifnlUXBDHecEG_nz06n1dXOW8LjTrS8b5_UZ3TDglBmbiollUcJ0gux1BHW4_g3TpAULsagq7zBLMDX2uX5-SGZXYFG8z8y5hQe5hNmA-c8i44VcApxTyXeq2Kh0kfym0tmp2BVA8uTnlX53nRu1fVcws-m6uH_bK6__zpfvW1ufv25XZ1c9eoluO5MUNvKcMDYhYwHQxQjjG0bWt7zK3SghAOuus63VJtdG8RYMSItmTosab0sro92uoIWzklN0LayQhOHgoxrSWk2SlvpKXFwirTK0IYYwpaA6jFggMHwzpcvD4evaZlGI1W5ekJ_Inp6U1wG7mOP2XPOsYQKQbvHgxS_LGYPMvRZWW8h2DikiXhmIiWcsEL-uYJuo1LCuWn9lRLqeCM_KXWUB7ggo2lr9qbyhuOO9EK0qNCXf-DKkub0amSKetK_UTw9pFgY8DPmxz9Yfb5FBRHUJWh52SsVK7MvmClg_MSI7lPqjwmVZakykNS5V5Knkj__ON_RL8BNQPraQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semcancer_2023_03_007 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/pros.10177 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05146.x 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.075 10.1002/pros.24091 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.018 10.1097/JU.0000000000000804 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.068 10.1093/jnci/djm153 10.1038/nrurol.2013.112 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500847 10.1002/ijc.2910200506 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.006 10.5152/dir.2014.13322 10.1111/pin.12513 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31812f7b27 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01525-X 10.1001/jama.1994.03510290050036 10.1097/00000478-198812000-00001 10.1111/bju.12458 10.1159/000516681 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.012 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.014 10.1093/jnci/djt151 10.3322/caac.21708 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0154 10.1038/pcan.2013.54 10.1002/pros.22903 10.1097/00000478-199612000-00009 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022. The Author(s). The Author(s) 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022. The Author(s). – notice: The Author(s) 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s40001-022-00801-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2047-783X |
EndPage | 8 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f353dfce9c22444ca5ea05187a7ae461 PMC9464402 A716858290 10_1186_s40001_022_00801_0 |
GeographicLocations | Japan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Japan |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; grantid: No: 2020-I2M-C&T-B-021 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION DIK EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 OK1 P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 UKHRP PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-eb9f341b04fa13bea3711a555f917fcd8227ad666d53ded9f0a1042df2b91d33 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2047-783X 0949-2321 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:52 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:11:33 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:04:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 07:34:44 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:48:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:35:01 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:07:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:25:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:43 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c571t-eb9f341b04fa13bea3711a555f917fcd8227ad666d53ded9f0a1042df2b91d33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2715338742?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 36088348 |
PQID | 2715338742 |
PQPubID | 2040181 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f353dfce9c22444ca5ea05187a7ae461 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9464402 proquest_miscellaneous_2712853787 proquest_journals_2715338742 gale_infotracmisc_A716858290 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A716858290 gale_healthsolutions_A716858290 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s40001_022_00801_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40001_022_00801_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-09-10 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-09-10 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2022 text: 2022-09-10 day: 10 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | European journal of medical research |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | J Mygatt (801_CR19) 2014; 17 R Takashima (801_CR30) 2002; 59 V Iremashvili (801_CR25) 2012; 80 T Hossack (801_CR20) 2012; 188 C J (801_CR7) 2021; 26 HA Al-Ahmadie (801_CR18) 2008; 32 M Sánchez-Chapado (801_CR24) 2003; 54 JI Epstein (801_CR4) 1994; 271 SA Rice (801_CR6) 2013; 185 T Kimura (801_CR13) 2016; 195 N Breslow (801_CR16) 1977; 20 JE McNeal (801_CR21) 1988; 12 PE Teloken (801_CR28) 2017; 198 K Stamatiou (801_CR22) 2006; 9 GP Haas (801_CR23) 2007; 99 B Garvey (801_CR11) 2014; 20 G Tarantino (801_CR2) 2021; 7 Y Zhou (801_CR29) 2021; 81 NB Delongchamps (801_CR12) 2009; 182 TH Van der Kwast (801_CR5) 2013; 10 M Perera (801_CR8) 2014; 113 AR Zlotta (801_CR15) 2013; 105 S Sato (801_CR17) 2017; 67 AR Schned (801_CR9) 1996; 20 RL Siegel (801_CR1) 2022; 72 M Massanova (801_CR10) 2021; 105 JJ Lee (801_CR26) 2015; 75 H Inaba (801_CR14) 2020; 204 A Erbersdobler (801_CR27) 2004; 94 M Maggi (801_CR3) 2020; 6 |
References_xml | – volume: 54 start-page: 238 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 801_CR24 publication-title: Prostate doi: 10.1002/pros.10177 – volume: 94 start-page: 122 issue: 9 year: 2004 ident: 801_CR27 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05146.x – volume: 198 start-page: 131 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 801_CR28 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.075 – volume: 81 start-page: 135 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 801_CR29 publication-title: Prostate doi: 10.1002/pros.24091 – volume: 182 start-page: 927 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 801_CR12 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.018 – volume: 204 start-page: 267 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 801_CR14 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000804 – volume: 195 start-page: 1415 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 801_CR13 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.068 – volume: 99 start-page: 1484 issue: 19 year: 2007 ident: 801_CR23 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm153 – volume: 10 start-page: 473 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 801_CR5 publication-title: Nat Rev Urol doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.112 – volume: 9 start-page: 45 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 801_CR22 publication-title: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500847 – volume: 20 start-page: 680 issue: 5 year: 1977 ident: 801_CR16 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910200506 – volume: 188 start-page: 781 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 801_CR20 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.006 – volume: 20 start-page: 229 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 801_CR11 publication-title: Diagn interv radiol doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.13322 – volume: 67 start-page: 156 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 801_CR17 publication-title: Pathol Int doi: 10.1111/pin.12513 – volume: 32 start-page: 229 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 801_CR18 publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31812f7b27 – volume: 59 start-page: 692 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 801_CR30 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01525-X – volume: 271 start-page: 368 issue: 5 year: 1994 ident: 801_CR4 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510290050036 – volume: 12 start-page: 897 year: 1988 ident: 801_CR21 publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol doi: 10.1097/00000478-198812000-00001 – volume: 113 start-page: 29 issue: Suppl 2 year: 2014 ident: 801_CR8 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.12458 – volume: 105 start-page: 804 issue: 9–10 year: 2021 ident: 801_CR10 publication-title: Urol Int doi: 10.1159/000516681 – volume: 80 start-page: 1063 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 801_CR25 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.012 – volume: 6 start-page: 463 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 801_CR3 publication-title: Eur Urol Focus doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.014 – volume: 185 start-page: 132 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 801_CR6 publication-title: Rev Urol – volume: 105 start-page: 1050 issue: 14 year: 2013 ident: 801_CR15 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt151 – volume: 26 start-page: 100 year: 2021 ident: 801_CR7 publication-title: Cancer Treat Res Commun – volume: 72 start-page: 1 year: 2022 ident: 801_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21708 – volume: 7 start-page: FSO643 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 801_CR2 publication-title: Future Sci OA. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0154 – volume: 17 start-page: 75 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 801_CR19 publication-title: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.54 – volume: 75 start-page: 183 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 801_CR26 publication-title: Prostate doi: 10.1002/pros.22903 – volume: 20 start-page: 1501 issue: 12 year: 1996 ident: 801_CR9 publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol doi: 10.1097/00000478-199612000-00009 |
SSID | ssj0000626799 |
Score | 2.3110425 |
Snippet | Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present... Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the present study is to... Abstract Background Current prostate cancer (PCa) screening may detect nonprogressive lesion, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The purpose of the... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Age Autopsies Autopsy Biopsy Cancer Cancer surgery Diagnosis Latent cancer Malignancy Oncology, Experimental Patients Prostate cancer Software Spatial distribution Tumors Urological surgery |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxQxFA_Sg3gRrYpja40geJChM5lkknirxVKEeqrQW8inFurs0t097H_ve5nssKOgF2_L5AV23kfe7zEvv0fIO9VrF8GwtQMHqXlUTe2UxR53H1VykJHzFIWrr_3lN_7lRtzsjfrCnrCRHnhU3GnqRBeSj9pDsuHcWxEtOJKSVtrIx8IHct5eMTWewayXWu9uyaj-dMWb3D0EtReiJPg1y0SZsP_PY_n3Vsm93HPxhDwuoJGejX_2KXkQh0Py8Kp8Fn9GNufTNEG6SPQnYOvvSKSxpXYIdIVN07A9IEduGW9FS38WvQOsOayz3O6SJF3iTRB4Tj26xP1HWKWq3kJMUHe7WK62NJPSPifXF5-vzy_rMk-h9kK26zo6nSBpuYYn23Yu2k62rRVCJKjZkg-AFaQNUM8EUHkMOjUWijUWEnO6DV33ghwMiyG-JJS7EJVVysXWAaJLWigWhNW-9amVja5Iu1Ot8YVrHEde3Jlcc6jejOYwYA6TzWGainyY9ixHpo2_Sn9Ci02SyJKdH4DvmOI75l--U5E3aG8zXjmdYt2cQRGpBH5irsj7LIHRDi_gbbm0AGpA3qyZ5PFMEqLUz5d3PmXKKbEyTCLaVpKzirydlnEndr4NcbHJMgwgFZyrFZEzX5y9-3xluP2RmcI1B7jbsFf_Q1lH5BHL0aMhdR-Tg_X9Jr4GQLZ2Jzn2fgGqwDNP priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9UwEA-6gngRP7G6agTBg5Rt-pXEi6yLyyKspxXeLeRzXdhtn6_vHd5_70yaVquwt9JMKOlkJr9JJr8h5L1opfGg2NzABMlrL4rcCI057taLYGBFjlUUzr-3Zz_qb6tmlTbchpRWOfnE6Khdb3GP_KjkiEwERHKf179yrBqFp6uphMZdcg-pyzCli6_4vMdSAFrncqTbq2UO4IFN92ZEezTURcwngmgMcRM8LdamSOH_v6P-N3nyr9Xo9BF5mGAkPR71_pjc8d0Tcv88HZQ_JbuTub4g7QO9AbR9idQae6o7RwdMo4buDllzU8ErmjK26DWgz24b5aZrk3SNd0PgPbU4STafoJWKfA9WQs1Vvx72NNLUPiMXp18vTs7yVGEhtw1n29wbGWAZM0UdNKuM1xVnTDdNEyCKC9YBeuDaQYTjmsp5J0OhIXwrXSiNZK6qnpODru_8C0Jr47zQQhjPDGC8AMooXaOlZTYwXsiMsOnXKpvYx7EIxrWKUYho1agOBepQUR2qyMjHuc965N64VfoLamyWRN7s-KLfXKpkhipUMJBgvbQAXera6sZrcEuCa6593bKMvEV9q_ES6mz96hjCStHgoXNGPkQJtH8YgNXpGgP8BmTSWkgeLiTBbu2yeZpTKvmNQf2Z5Rl5NzdjT8yF63y_izIlgCzwtBnhi7m4GPuypbv6GbnDZQ0AuChf3v7xV-RBGe1CwjJ9SA62m51_DeBra95EC_sNvHcsQA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Comparison of malignancy and spatial distribution between latent and clinical prostate cancer: an 8-year biopsy study |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2715338742 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2712853787 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9464402 https://doaj.org/article/f353dfce9c22444ca5ea05187a7ae461 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1bi9QwFA57AfFFvGJ1HSMIPki1adMmEURml12WgVlEd2HeQq7rwtiOcwHn33uStoPVRZ9maE4GknP7zvRcEHrNK6EdMDbVICApdTxLNVchx9047jV45DhFYXpRnV_Ryayc7aF-3FF3gatbQ7swT-pqOX_388f2Eyj8x6jwvHq_ollMDIKwKgAg-LaPDsEzsaCo0w7ut5Y5r5ho2-9RkQKYIH0dza0_M_BVsaX_34b7z2TK37zT2X10r4OVeNzKwQO05-qH6M60e3H-CG1OdvMGcePxd0Df16HVxhar2uJVSKuG7TZ00e0GYOEugwvPAY3W60jXl1HiRagVgefYBKFZfoBVzNMtaA3WN81itcWxbe1jdHl2enlynnYTF1JTMrJOnRYe3JrOqFek0E4VjBBVlqWHqM4bC2iCKQsRjy0L66zwmYJwLrc-14LYoniCDuqmdk8Rpto6rjjXjmjAfF6UPLelEoYYT1gmEkT6q5Wm60YehmLMZYxKeCVbdkhgh4zskFmC3u72LNpeHP-kPg4c21GGPtrxQbO8lp1aSl_AQbxxwgCUodSo0ikwU5wpphytSIJeBn7Ltih1Zw3kGMJMXoaX0Al6EymChMIBjOrKGuAaQmetAeXRgBL02AyXe5mSvRrInAU8zhnNE_Rqtxx2hty42jWbSJMD6ALLmyA2kMXB2Ycr9c232EtcUADEWf7sv-d8ju7mUTUEeO4jdLBebtwLwGNrPUL7bMZG6HA8nnydwOfx6cXnL6P478YoKuAvEQE1dA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1baxQxFA5lC-qLeMXRaiMoPsjQyezMTiKItLVla7uLyAp9C7nWQp1Z94Lsj_I_ek7moqPQt74tkxOW5FzyneRcCHnFR0I7YGysQUDizPEk1lxhjLtx3Gs4kUMXhcl0NP6afTrPz7fIrzYXBsMqW5sYDLWtDN6R76UFIhMOntyH-Y8Yu0bh62rbQqMWi1O3-Qku2_L9yUfg7-s0PT6aHY7jpqtAbPKCrWKnhQfTrZPMKzbUTg0LxlSe5x48F28snJiFsoDqbT60zgqfKHBZUutTLZjF-0-w-NvZEDyZAdk-OJp-_tJd6iTgHhSiru-XiRjQCmsTdfhob5klIYAJ3D8EavCrdxiGngH_nwz_Rmv-dfwd3yN3G9xK92tBu0-2XPmA3Jo0L_MPyfqwa2hIK0-_A7y_wFoeG6pKS5cYtw3TLZbpbTps0SZEjF4B3C1Xga7N06RzTEaB79SgVC7ewSjl8Qb2n-rLar7c0FAX9xGZ3cTmPyaDsirdE0IzbR1XnGvHNIBKL3Ke2lwJw4xnRSIiwtqtlaYpd45dN65kcHv4SNbskMAOGdghk4i87ebM62If11IfIMc6SizUHT5UiwvZ6L30Q1iIN04YwEpZZlTuFNhBXqhCuWzEIrKL_JZ11mtnbuQ--LE8x1fuiLwJFGhwYAFGNXkTsA1YuqtHudOjBENh-sOtTMnGUC3lH7WKyMtuGGdi8F3pqnWgSQHVgWmPSNGTxd7a-yPl5bdQrFxkgLiT9On1f75Lbo9nkzN5djI9fUbupEFHBGCEHTJYLdbuOSC_lX7R6Bsl8oY1_Dda-Gp7 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+malignancy+and+spatial+distribution+between+latent+and+clinical+prostate+cancer%3A+an+8-year+biopsy+study&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+medical+research&rft.au=Hanzi%2C+Huang&rft.au=Yuliang%2C+Chen&rft.au=Zhien%2C+Zhou&rft.au=Yuzhi%2C+Zuo&rft.date=2022-09-10&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=0949-2321&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40001-022-00801-0&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A716858290 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2047-783X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2047-783X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2047-783X&client=summon |