Analysis of Pressure Distribution in Transfemoral Prosthetic Socket for Prefabrication Evaluation via the Finite Element Method
In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the desig...
Saved in:
Published in | Bioengineering (Basel) Vol. 6; no. 4; p. 98 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
24.10.2019
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics. In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value ( R 2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics. In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value ( > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics. In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics. |
Author | Otsuka, Hiroshi Hanafusa, Akihiko Shinichirou, Yamamoto Agarie, Yukio Ohnishi, Kengo Jamaludin, Mohd Syahmi |
AuthorAffiliation | 4 Department of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan; ohnishi@mail.dendai.ac.jp 1 Department of Bio-Science and Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan; hanafusa@shibaura-it.ac.jp (A.H.); yamashin@shibaura-it.ac.jp (Y.S.) 2 Department of Supporting Prosthetic Orthotics, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3102, Japan; agarie@nuhw.ac.jp 3 Department of Prosthetic and Orthotics, University of Human Arts and Science, Iwatsuki Ward 339-0077, Japan; hiroshi_otsuka@human.ac.jp |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Supporting Prosthetic Orthotics, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3102, Japan; agarie@nuhw.ac.jp – name: 3 Department of Prosthetic and Orthotics, University of Human Arts and Science, Iwatsuki Ward 339-0077, Japan; hiroshi_otsuka@human.ac.jp – name: 4 Department of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan; ohnishi@mail.dendai.ac.jp – name: 1 Department of Bio-Science and Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan; hanafusa@shibaura-it.ac.jp (A.H.); yamashin@shibaura-it.ac.jp (Y.S.) |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mohd Syahmi orcidid: 0000-0001-5252-2132 surname: Jamaludin fullname: Jamaludin, Mohd Syahmi – sequence: 2 givenname: Akihiko surname: Hanafusa fullname: Hanafusa, Akihiko – sequence: 3 givenname: Yamamoto surname: Shinichirou fullname: Shinichirou, Yamamoto – sequence: 4 givenname: Yukio surname: Agarie fullname: Agarie, Yukio – sequence: 5 givenname: Hiroshi surname: Otsuka fullname: Otsuka, Hiroshi – sequence: 6 givenname: Kengo surname: Ohnishi fullname: Ohnishi, Kengo |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkl9rFDEUxYNUbK39CErAF19W838mCEKpWy1UFKzPIZO5s5t1NqlJZqFPfnWzu7W0RfApl-R3Tu7NyXN0EGIAhF5S8pZzTd51PkJY-ACQfFgoIgjR7RN0xDhRM8mlOLhXH6KTnFeEEMqZZEo8Q4ecKsm0ao7Q79Ngx5vsM44D_pYg5ykB_uhzSb6bio8B-4Cvkg15gHVMdqxUzGUJxTv8PbqfUPAQ01Y72C55Z3ei-caO077ceIsrj8998AXwfIQ1hIK_QFnG_gV6Otgxw8nteox-nM-vzj7PLr9-ujg7vZw52dAy66UlPeE90a5rOW-FYnUHmka0jhI39G1rHSNaqsEJaFrO9OBkaxunBGfQ8GN0sffto12Z6-TXNt2YaL3ZbcS0MDbVkUYwmvVsULRnjlJBQGorNQOlFG04MGir14e91_XUraF3dZr6Lg9MH54EvzSLuDGq9sc1rQZvbg1S_DVBLmbts4NxtAHilE2NTgstBd_e9foRuopTqplVSgqlBZOEV-rV_Y7uWvmbcwXkHnA1vFyjukMoMdsvZf75paru_SOd82UXax3Mj_9R_wGc2djh |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2021_1991309 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2022_103829 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12008_024_02006_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_aisy_202400995 crossref_primary_10_1177_15280837241290169 crossref_primary_10_1097_PXR_0000000000000251 crossref_primary_10_1177_09544089221131155 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_024_03206_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12008_024_01974_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2025_112513 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.020 10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626703 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00126 10.1007/s10439-006-9208-3 10.1177/0309364612436409 10.1080/09638280500277032 10.1007/s12008-018-0458-8 10.1682/JRRD.2004.01.0003 10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00027-7 10.1115/IMECE2004-61583 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00002-5 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.019 10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0189 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2019 by the authors. 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2019 by the authors. 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 8FE 8FG 8FH ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ L6V LK8 M7P M7S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.3390/bioengineering6040098 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Database ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection Biological Science Database Engineering Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Engineering Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Technology Collection Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 2306-5354 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8 PMC6956391 31652967 10_3390_bioengineering6040098 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: JSPS KAKENHI grantid: JP18K12143 |
GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 8FE 8FG 8FH AAFWJ AAYXX ABDBF ABJCF ACUHS ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ HYE IAO KQ8 L6V LK8 M7P M7S MODMG M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC PTHSS RPM NPM ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-d5a0d03d09cb83384625a0e7748c10cfd88ac20956fc4e78329fc58a7c6432e73 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2306-5354 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:43 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:04:02 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:57:30 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 04:00:52 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:59:47 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:12:08 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | 3D model finite element method biomechanics prosthetic socket finite element analysis transfemoral residuum |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c571t-d5a0d03d09cb83384625a0e7748c10cfd88ac20956fc4e78329fc58a7c6432e73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5252-2132 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8 |
PMID | 31652967 |
PQID | 2546942503 |
PQPubID | 2055440 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6956391 proquest_miscellaneous_2309495438 proquest_journals_2546942503 pubmed_primary_31652967 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering6040098 crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_bioengineering6040098 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20191024 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-10-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2019 text: 20191024 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Switzerland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Switzerland – name: Basel |
PublicationTitle | Bioengineering (Basel) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Bioengineering (Basel) |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | MDPI AG MDPI |
Publisher_xml | – name: MDPI AG – name: MDPI |
References | Sanders (ref_5) 1996; 4 Zhang (ref_6) 1998; 20 Schuch (ref_10) 1988; 12 Zhang (ref_1) 1995; 17 Sengeh (ref_7) 2016; 59 Ramrez (ref_20) 2012; 36 Ellankavi (ref_23) 2018; 6 Colombo (ref_9) 2018; 12 ref_11 Reynolds (ref_14) 1992; 30 ref_21 Childress (ref_15) 1996; 33 Portnoy (ref_8) 2007; 35 Meulenbelt (ref_13) 2006; 28 Winson (ref_19) 2004; 41 ref_2 ref_18 ref_17 Jamaludin (ref_24) 2017; 68 ref_16 Mak (ref_3) 2001; 38 Portnoy (ref_12) 2009; 42 Childress (ref_4) 1996; 33 Sanders (ref_22) 2011; 48 |
References_xml | – volume: 59 start-page: 379 year: 2016 ident: ref_7 article-title: Multi-material 3-D viscoelastic model of a transtibial residuum from in-vivo indentation and MRI data publication-title: J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.020 – ident: ref_11 doi: 10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626703 – volume: 6 start-page: 126 year: 2018 ident: ref_23 article-title: An Efficient Modelling-Simulation-Analysis Workflow to Investigate Stump-Socket Interaction Using Patient-Specific, Three-Dimensional, Continuum-Mechanical, Finite Element Residual Limb Models publication-title: Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00126 – volume: 38 start-page: 161174 year: 2001 ident: ref_3 article-title: State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics socket interface publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. – ident: ref_2 – volume: 35 start-page: 120 year: 2007 ident: ref_8 article-title: Real-time patient-specific finite element analysis of internal stresses in the soft tissues of a residual limb: A new tool for prosthetic fitting publication-title: Ann. Biomed. Eng. doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9208-3 – volume: 33 start-page: 227 year: 1996 ident: ref_15 article-title: Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with trans-tibial amputation publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. – volume: 36 start-page: 405 year: 2012 ident: ref_20 article-title: Incidence of the boundary condition between bone and soft tissue in a finite element model of a transfemoral amputee publication-title: Prosthet. Orthot. Int. doi: 10.1177/0309364612436409 – volume: 4 start-page: 288302 year: 1996 ident: ref_5 article-title: Interface mechanics in lower-limb external prosthetics: A review of finite element models publication-title: IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. – volume: 28 start-page: 603 year: 2006 ident: ref_13 article-title: Skin problems in lower limb amputees: A systematic review publication-title: Disabil. Rehabil. doi: 10.1080/09638280500277032 – ident: ref_16 – volume: 12 start-page: 699 year: 2018 ident: ref_9 article-title: 3D interactive environment for the design of medical devices publication-title: Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) doi: 10.1007/s12008-018-0458-8 – volume: 41 start-page: 775 year: 2004 ident: ref_19 article-title: Finite element analysis to determine effect of mono limb flexibility on structural strength and interaction publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.01.0003 – volume: 68 start-page: 675 year: 2017 ident: ref_24 article-title: Accuracy Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction of Transfemoral Residual Limb Model Using Basic Spline Interpolation publication-title: IFMBE Proc. – volume: 20 start-page: 360273 year: 1998 ident: ref_6 article-title: Finite element modeling of a residual lower-limb in a prosthetic socket: A survey of the development in the first decade publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys. doi: 10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00027-7 – ident: ref_17 doi: 10.1115/IMECE2004-61583 – volume: 17 start-page: 559 year: 1995 ident: ref_1 article-title: Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys. doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00002-5 – volume: 42 start-page: 2686 year: 2009 ident: ref_12 article-title: Patient-specific analyses of deep tissue loads post transtibial amputation in residual limbs of multiple prosthetic users publication-title: J. Biomech. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.019 – volume: 48 start-page: 949 year: 2011 ident: ref_22 article-title: Residual limb volume change: Systematic review of measurement and management publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0189 – ident: ref_18 – volume: 33 start-page: 253266 year: 1996 ident: ref_4 article-title: A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. – ident: ref_21 – volume: 30 start-page: 419 year: 1992 ident: ref_14 article-title: Interface load analysis for computer-aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets publication-title: Med. Boil. Eng. – volume: 12 start-page: 81 year: 1988 ident: ref_10 article-title: Report From: International Workshop on Above-Knee Fitting and Alignment Techniques publication-title: Clin. Prosthet. Orthot. |
SSID | ssj0001325264 |
Score | 2.1612337 |
Snippet | In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 98 |
SubjectTerms | 3d model Amputation Bioengineering biomechanics Composite materials Correlation coefficients Finite element analysis Finite element method Investigations Load distribution (forces) Magnetic resonance imaging Manufacturing Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Mimicry Prefabrication Pressure Pressure distribution Prostheses prosthetic socket Prosthetics Simulation Skin Sockets Stress concentration Three dimensional models Trans-femoral amputees transfemoral residuum Viscoelasticity |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB7B9gIHVN7bFmQkrqGJnYd9Qm3ZVYXUqgIq9RY59oRGqpKy3XLtX2cm8Wa7qIJTVoltWTsPzze2vwH4WCTOJ-hl5Cl2IIBCpqidkRGmsTKVzH3iON9xcpofn6dfL7KLkHC7CccqVz6xd9S-c5wj32fedkMKFqvP178irhrFu6uhhMZj2CIXrPUEtg5np2ff1lkWJTNa8oerO4rw_X7VdLhm-stZh43eWJR67v6HAs6_z03eW4jm2_AsRJDiYBD5c3iE7Qt4eo9X8CXcrahGRFeL4QLgAsUX5sgN5a1E04p-mar5pC0Nd8a3Py75RqP4Ti4Sl4KiWe5b22oR8npiNlKDi9-NFdRezBsOWsVsOIUuTvqC1K_gfD77cXQchUoLkcuKZBn5zMY-Vj42rtIEWlNCRTZGCg21S2JXe62ZypGwVO1SLMgLmNpl2haOAhqJhXoNk7Zr8S0I7WrUTqs8dyalh6H4yFhdE1Cznn5PIV391aULNORcDeOqJDjCEioflNAUPo3drgcejv91OGQ5jo2ZRrt_0S1-lsEqSyO9pJl56QgWxpgZmxmJhOiSQqFEGmRvpQVlsO2bcq2JU_gwfiar5K0W22J3S20UwWaTpYqGeDMozTgTleS82V1ModhQp42pbn5pm8ue-TsnCSiT7Px7WrvwhMI6wyusTPdgslzc4jsKnZbV-2AffwDUqx6T priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Analysis of Pressure Distribution in Transfemoral Prosthetic Socket for Prefabrication Evaluation via the Finite Element Method |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652967 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2546942503 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2309495438 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6956391 https://doaj.org/article/92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8 |
Volume | 6 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB7a9NIeStPntumiQq9uLMkP6Zht1gmBhNA2kJuRpTExBG_ZbnLNX--M7XV3SyCXnGxsycieGc83kuYbgK-59EFiUFEg7EABCpmi8VZFmMTaVioL0vN8x-lZdnyRnFymlxulvnhPWE8P3H-4fauCqjMZlCfkHmNqXWoVEuiWuUaFXZov-byNYKqbXdEqJVffp-xoiuv3q2aB_xj-MtZda7acUcfZfx_Q_H-_5IYDKl7BywE5ioN-xLvwBNvX8GKDT_AN3K0pRsSiFn3i3xLFIXPjDmWtRNOKzj3VvMOWHnfOWR9XnMkoftKvEVeCUCz3rV21HObzxHykBBe3jRPUXhQNg1Ux73efi9OuEPVbuCjmv74fR0OFhcinuVxFIXVxiHWIra8MBasJRUMuRoKExsvY18EYpnCkGKr2CeZk_bb2qXG5JyCjMNfvYKddtPgBhPE1Gm90lnmb0MESLrLOkOisC3Q-gWT9qUs_0I9zFYzrksIQllB5r4Qm8G3s9rvn33iow4zlODZm-uzuAilVOShV-ZBSTWBvrQXlYNN_Sq4cYOkXF9O7fBlvkzXyEotrcXFDbTSFyzZNND3ifa8040i0zHiRO59AvqVOW0PdvtM2Vx3jd0YS0FZ-fIx3-wTPCfRZ9r8q2YOd1fIGPxOwWlVTeGqKoyk8O5gdzgo6zuZn5z-mnWX9BdiVKKU |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcgAOiDcLBYwEx9DEdhL7gBDQXba0WyHRSr2lju3QSCgp2y2IE_-I38hMXttFFZx62tX6IWtnPDOf7fkG4EUaWRd5xwOHsQMCFNyKymoeeBkKnfPERZbOO2Z7yfRAfjyMD9fgd58LQ88qe5vYGGpXWzoj3yTedo0KFoo3J98CqhpFt6t9CY1WLXb8zx8I2U5fb2-hfF9yPhnvv58GXVWBwMZptAhcbEIXChdqmysEaBIRgAk9hkHKRqEtnFJEW4i4obDSp6jxurCxMqlF5819KnDeK3BVCvTklJk--bA80xE8xgCjTRTC9nAzL2u_5BVMaMdoteICm0oBF4W3f7_SPOf2JrfgZhevsretgt2GNV_dgRvnWAzvwq-e2ITVBWvTDeeebREjb1dMi5UVa5xiQe96cbpPlGtyTPmT7DMaZL9gGDvT2MLk8-4UkY0HInL2vTQM-7NJSSEyG7dv3tmsKX99Dw4uRQL3Yb2qK_8QmLKFV1aJJLFa4ofGaEwbVSAsNA6_j0D2f3VmO9Jzqr3xNUPwQxLKLpTQCF4Nw05a1o__DXhHchw6E2l380M9_5J1NiDT3HFcmeMWQWjoY21izT3ixygVnnucZKPXgqyzJKfZUu9H8HxoRhtAFzum8vUZ9hEI0nUsBU7xoFWaYSUiSuhqPR1BuqJOK0tdbanK44ZnPEEJCB09-veynsG16f5sN9vd3tt5DNcxoNTk27ncgPXF_Mw_waBtkT9tdgqDo8vemn8ApGFZMQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrYToAfFmoYCR4Bg2sfOwDwhRdlctpasVUKm34NgOjVQlZbsFceJ_8euYyWu7qIJTT1kltmXtPDyfPf4G4EUSGBs4yz2LsQMCFDRFaRT3XOgLlfHYBob2Ow5m8e5h-P4oOtqA391dGEqr7Hxi7ahtZWiPfES87QoVzBejvE2LmI-nb06_eVRBik5au3IajYrsu58_EL6dvd4bo6xfcj6dfH6367UVBjwTJcHSs5H2rS-sr0wmEayFiAa07zAkkibwTW6lJApDxBC5CV2C2q9yE0mdGFzIuUsEjnsNNhNCRQPY3JnM5h9XOzyCRxhuNNeGhFD-KCsqt2IZjMl-lFxbEOu6AZcFu3_nbF5YBKe34GYbvbK3jbrdhg1X3oGtC5yGd-FXR3PCqpw1lw8Xjo2Jn7ctrcWKktVLZE5ZvjjcnG6eHNNtSvYJ3bNbMoykqW-us0W7p8gmPS05-15ohu3ZtKCAmU2aDHh2UBfDvgeHVyKD-zAoq9I9BCZN7qSRIo6NCvGhMDZTWuYIErXF30MIu786NS0FOlXiOEkRCpGE0kslNIRXfbfThgPkfx12SI59Y6Lwrl9Ui69p6xFSxS3HmVluEJL6LlI6UtwhmgwS4bjDQbY7LUhbv3KWrqxgCM_7z-gR6JhHl646xzYCIbuKQoFDPGiUpp-JCGI6aE-GkKyp09pU17-UxXHNOh6jBIQKHv17Ws_gOppl-mFvtv8YbmB0qWih5-E2DJaLc_cEI7hl9rQ1FQZfrto6_wAln17D |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+Pressure+Distribution+in+Transfemoral+Prosthetic+Socket+for+Prefabrication+Evaluation+via+the+Finite+Element+Method&rft.jtitle=Bioengineering+%28Basel%29&rft.au=Mohd+Syahmi+Jamaludin&rft.au=Akihiko+Hanafusa&rft.au=Yamamoto+Shinichirou&rft.au=Yukio+Agarie&rft.date=2019-10-24&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.eissn=2306-5354&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=98&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fbioengineering6040098&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon |