Analysis of Pressure Distribution in Transfemoral Prosthetic Socket for Prefabrication Evaluation via the Finite Element Method

In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the desig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioengineering (Basel) Vol. 6; no. 4; p. 98
Main Authors Jamaludin, Mohd Syahmi, Hanafusa, Akihiko, Shinichirou, Yamamoto, Agarie, Yukio, Otsuka, Hiroshi, Ohnishi, Kengo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 24.10.2019
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.
AbstractList In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.
In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value ( R 2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.
In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value ( > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.
In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees by utilizing a finite element analysis. Correct shaping of the socket for an appropriate load distribution is a critical process in the design of lower-limb prosthesis sockets. The pressure distribution profile provides an understanding of the relationship between the socket design and the level of subject comfortability. Estimating the pressure profile is important, as it helps improve the prosthesis through an evaluation of the socket design before it undergoes the fabrication process. This study focused on utilizing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based three-dimensional (3D) model inside a predetermined finite element simulation. The simulation was predetermined by mimicking the actual socket-fitting environment. The results showed that the potential MRI-based 3D model simulation could be used as an estimation tool for a pressure distribution profile due to the high correlation coefficient value (R2 > 0.8) calculated when the pressure profiles were compared to the experiment data. The simulation also showed that the pressure distribution in the proximal area was higher (~30%) than in the distal area of the prosthetic socket for every subject. The results of this study will be of tremendous interest for fabricators through the use of a finite element model as an alternative method for the prefabrication and evaluation of prosthetic sockets. In future prosthetic socket fabrications, less intervention will be required in the development of a socket, and the participation of the subject in the socket-fitting session will not be necessary. The results suggest that this study will contribute to expanding the development of an overall prefabrication evaluation system to allow healthcare providers and engineers to simulate the fit and comfort of transfemoral prosthetics.
Author Otsuka, Hiroshi
Hanafusa, Akihiko
Shinichirou, Yamamoto
Agarie, Yukio
Ohnishi, Kengo
Jamaludin, Mohd Syahmi
AuthorAffiliation 4 Department of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan; ohnishi@mail.dendai.ac.jp
1 Department of Bio-Science and Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan; hanafusa@shibaura-it.ac.jp (A.H.); yamashin@shibaura-it.ac.jp (Y.S.)
2 Department of Supporting Prosthetic Orthotics, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3102, Japan; agarie@nuhw.ac.jp
3 Department of Prosthetic and Orthotics, University of Human Arts and Science, Iwatsuki Ward 339-0077, Japan; hiroshi_otsuka@human.ac.jp
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Supporting Prosthetic Orthotics, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata 950-3102, Japan; agarie@nuhw.ac.jp
– name: 3 Department of Prosthetic and Orthotics, University of Human Arts and Science, Iwatsuki Ward 339-0077, Japan; hiroshi_otsuka@human.ac.jp
– name: 4 Department of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo 120-8551, Japan; ohnishi@mail.dendai.ac.jp
– name: 1 Department of Bio-Science and Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan; hanafusa@shibaura-it.ac.jp (A.H.); yamashin@shibaura-it.ac.jp (Y.S.)
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mohd Syahmi
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5252-2132
  surname: Jamaludin
  fullname: Jamaludin, Mohd Syahmi
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Akihiko
  surname: Hanafusa
  fullname: Hanafusa, Akihiko
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yamamoto
  surname: Shinichirou
  fullname: Shinichirou, Yamamoto
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yukio
  surname: Agarie
  fullname: Agarie, Yukio
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hiroshi
  surname: Otsuka
  fullname: Otsuka, Hiroshi
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kengo
  surname: Ohnishi
  fullname: Ohnishi, Kengo
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkl9rFDEUxYNUbK39CErAF19W838mCEKpWy1UFKzPIZO5s5t1NqlJZqFPfnWzu7W0RfApl-R3Tu7NyXN0EGIAhF5S8pZzTd51PkJY-ACQfFgoIgjR7RN0xDhRM8mlOLhXH6KTnFeEEMqZZEo8Q4ecKsm0ao7Q79Ngx5vsM44D_pYg5ykB_uhzSb6bio8B-4Cvkg15gHVMdqxUzGUJxTv8PbqfUPAQ01Y72C55Z3ei-caO077ceIsrj8998AXwfIQ1hIK_QFnG_gV6Otgxw8nteox-nM-vzj7PLr9-ujg7vZw52dAy66UlPeE90a5rOW-FYnUHmka0jhI39G1rHSNaqsEJaFrO9OBkaxunBGfQ8GN0sffto12Z6-TXNt2YaL3ZbcS0MDbVkUYwmvVsULRnjlJBQGorNQOlFG04MGir14e91_XUraF3dZr6Lg9MH54EvzSLuDGq9sc1rQZvbg1S_DVBLmbts4NxtAHilE2NTgstBd_e9foRuopTqplVSgqlBZOEV-rV_Y7uWvmbcwXkHnA1vFyjukMoMdsvZf75paru_SOd82UXax3Mj_9R_wGc2djh
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2021_1991309
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2022_103829
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12008_024_02006_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_aisy_202400995
crossref_primary_10_1177_15280837241290169
crossref_primary_10_1097_PXR_0000000000000251
crossref_primary_10_1177_09544089221131155
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11517_024_03206_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12008_024_01974_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2025_112513
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.020
10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626703
10.3389/fbioe.2018.00126
10.1007/s10439-006-9208-3
10.1177/0309364612436409
10.1080/09638280500277032
10.1007/s12008-018-0458-8
10.1682/JRRD.2004.01.0003
10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00027-7
10.1115/IMECE2004-61583
10.1016/1350-4533(95)00002-5
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.019
10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0189
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2019 by the authors. 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2019 by the authors. 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
8FE
8FG
8FH
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
L6V
LK8
M7P
M7S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3390/bioengineering6040098
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Biological Science Database
Engineering Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Technology Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 2306-5354
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8
PMC6956391
31652967
10_3390_bioengineering6040098
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: JSPS KAKENHI
  grantid: JP18K12143
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
8FE
8FG
8FH
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ACUHS
ADBBV
AFKRA
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
KQ8
L6V
LK8
M7P
M7S
MODMG
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PROAC
PTHSS
RPM
NPM
ABUWG
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-d5a0d03d09cb83384625a0e7748c10cfd88ac20956fc4e78329fc58a7c6432e73
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2306-5354
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:43 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:04:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:57:30 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 04:00:52 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:59:47 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:12:08 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords 3D model
finite element method
biomechanics
prosthetic socket
finite element analysis
transfemoral residuum
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c571t-d5a0d03d09cb83384625a0e7748c10cfd88ac20956fc4e78329fc58a7c6432e73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-5252-2132
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8
PMID 31652967
PQID 2546942503
PQPubID 2055440
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6956391
proquest_miscellaneous_2309495438
proquest_journals_2546942503
pubmed_primary_31652967
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering6040098
crossref_citationtrail_10_3390_bioengineering6040098
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20191024
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-10-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2019
  text: 20191024
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
– name: Basel
PublicationTitle Bioengineering (Basel)
PublicationTitleAlternate Bioengineering (Basel)
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher MDPI AG
MDPI
Publisher_xml – name: MDPI AG
– name: MDPI
References Sanders (ref_5) 1996; 4
Zhang (ref_6) 1998; 20
Schuch (ref_10) 1988; 12
Zhang (ref_1) 1995; 17
Sengeh (ref_7) 2016; 59
Ramrez (ref_20) 2012; 36
Ellankavi (ref_23) 2018; 6
Colombo (ref_9) 2018; 12
ref_11
Reynolds (ref_14) 1992; 30
ref_21
Childress (ref_15) 1996; 33
Portnoy (ref_8) 2007; 35
Meulenbelt (ref_13) 2006; 28
Winson (ref_19) 2004; 41
ref_2
ref_18
ref_17
Jamaludin (ref_24) 2017; 68
ref_16
Mak (ref_3) 2001; 38
Portnoy (ref_12) 2009; 42
Childress (ref_4) 1996; 33
Sanders (ref_22) 2011; 48
References_xml – volume: 59
  start-page: 379
  year: 2016
  ident: ref_7
  article-title: Multi-material 3-D viscoelastic model of a transtibial residuum from in-vivo indentation and MRI data
  publication-title: J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.02.020
– ident: ref_11
  doi: 10.1109/IECBES.2018.8626703
– volume: 6
  start-page: 126
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_23
  article-title: An Efficient Modelling-Simulation-Analysis Workflow to Investigate Stump-Socket Interaction Using Patient-Specific, Three-Dimensional, Continuum-Mechanical, Finite Element Residual Limb Models
  publication-title: Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00126
– volume: 38
  start-page: 161174
  year: 2001
  ident: ref_3
  article-title: State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics socket interface
  publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
– ident: ref_2
– volume: 35
  start-page: 120
  year: 2007
  ident: ref_8
  article-title: Real-time patient-specific finite element analysis of internal stresses in the soft tissues of a residual limb: A new tool for prosthetic fitting
  publication-title: Ann. Biomed. Eng.
  doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9208-3
– volume: 33
  start-page: 227
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_15
  article-title: Parametric analysis using the finite element method to investigate prosthetic interface stresses for persons with trans-tibial amputation
  publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
– volume: 36
  start-page: 405
  year: 2012
  ident: ref_20
  article-title: Incidence of the boundary condition between bone and soft tissue in a finite element model of a transfemoral amputee
  publication-title: Prosthet. Orthot. Int.
  doi: 10.1177/0309364612436409
– volume: 4
  start-page: 288302
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_5
  article-title: Interface mechanics in lower-limb external prosthetics: A review of finite element models
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 603
  year: 2006
  ident: ref_13
  article-title: Skin problems in lower limb amputees: A systematic review
  publication-title: Disabil. Rehabil.
  doi: 10.1080/09638280500277032
– ident: ref_16
– volume: 12
  start-page: 699
  year: 2018
  ident: ref_9
  article-title: 3D interactive environment for the design of medical devices
  publication-title: Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM)
  doi: 10.1007/s12008-018-0458-8
– volume: 41
  start-page: 775
  year: 2004
  ident: ref_19
  article-title: Finite element analysis to determine effect of mono limb flexibility on structural strength and interaction
  publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
  doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2004.01.0003
– volume: 68
  start-page: 675
  year: 2017
  ident: ref_24
  article-title: Accuracy Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction of Transfemoral Residual Limb Model Using Basic Spline Interpolation
  publication-title: IFMBE Proc.
– volume: 20
  start-page: 360273
  year: 1998
  ident: ref_6
  article-title: Finite element modeling of a residual lower-limb in a prosthetic socket: A survey of the development in the first decade
  publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00027-7
– ident: ref_17
  doi: 10.1115/IMECE2004-61583
– volume: 17
  start-page: 559
  year: 1995
  ident: ref_1
  article-title: Development of a non-linear finite element modelling of the below-knee prosthetic socket interface
  publication-title: Med. Eng. Phys.
  doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00002-5
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2686
  year: 2009
  ident: ref_12
  article-title: Patient-specific analyses of deep tissue loads post transtibial amputation in residual limbs of multiple prosthetic users
  publication-title: J. Biomech.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.019
– volume: 48
  start-page: 949
  year: 2011
  ident: ref_22
  article-title: Residual limb volume change: Systematic review of measurement and management
  publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
  doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0189
– ident: ref_18
– volume: 33
  start-page: 253266
  year: 1996
  ident: ref_4
  article-title: A review of prosthetic interface stress investigations
  publication-title: J. Rehabil. Res. Dev.
– ident: ref_21
– volume: 30
  start-page: 419
  year: 1992
  ident: ref_14
  article-title: Interface load analysis for computer-aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets
  publication-title: Med. Boil. Eng.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 81
  year: 1988
  ident: ref_10
  article-title: Report From: International Workshop on Above-Knee Fitting and Alignment Techniques
  publication-title: Clin. Prosthet. Orthot.
SSID ssj0001325264
Score 2.1612337
Snippet In this study, we estimated and validated the pressure distribution profile between the residuum and two types of prosthetic sockets for transfemoral amputees...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 98
SubjectTerms 3d model
Amputation
Bioengineering
biomechanics
Composite materials
Correlation coefficients
Finite element analysis
Finite element method
Investigations
Load distribution (forces)
Magnetic resonance imaging
Manufacturing
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Mimicry
Prefabrication
Pressure
Pressure distribution
Prostheses
prosthetic socket
Prosthetics
Simulation
Skin
Sockets
Stress concentration
Three dimensional models
Trans-femoral amputees
transfemoral residuum
Viscoelasticity
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwEB7B9gIHVN7bFmQkrqGJnYd9Qm3ZVYXUqgIq9RY59oRGqpKy3XLtX2cm8Wa7qIJTVoltWTsPzze2vwH4WCTOJ-hl5Cl2IIBCpqidkRGmsTKVzH3iON9xcpofn6dfL7KLkHC7CccqVz6xd9S-c5wj32fedkMKFqvP178irhrFu6uhhMZj2CIXrPUEtg5np2ff1lkWJTNa8oerO4rw_X7VdLhm-stZh43eWJR67v6HAs6_z03eW4jm2_AsRJDiYBD5c3iE7Qt4eo9X8CXcrahGRFeL4QLgAsUX5sgN5a1E04p-mar5pC0Nd8a3Py75RqP4Ti4Sl4KiWe5b22oR8npiNlKDi9-NFdRezBsOWsVsOIUuTvqC1K_gfD77cXQchUoLkcuKZBn5zMY-Vj42rtIEWlNCRTZGCg21S2JXe62ZypGwVO1SLMgLmNpl2haOAhqJhXoNk7Zr8S0I7WrUTqs8dyalh6H4yFhdE1Cznn5PIV391aULNORcDeOqJDjCEioflNAUPo3drgcejv91OGQ5jo2ZRrt_0S1-lsEqSyO9pJl56QgWxpgZmxmJhOiSQqFEGmRvpQVlsO2bcq2JU_gwfiar5K0W22J3S20UwWaTpYqGeDMozTgTleS82V1ModhQp42pbn5pm8ue-TsnCSiT7Px7WrvwhMI6wyusTPdgslzc4jsKnZbV-2AffwDUqx6T
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Analysis of Pressure Distribution in Transfemoral Prosthetic Socket for Prefabrication Evaluation via the Finite Element Method
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652967
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2546942503
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2309495438
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6956391
https://doaj.org/article/92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8
Volume 6
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB7a9NIeStPntumiQq9uLMkP6Zht1gmBhNA2kJuRpTExBG_ZbnLNX--M7XV3SyCXnGxsycieGc83kuYbgK-59EFiUFEg7EABCpmi8VZFmMTaVioL0vN8x-lZdnyRnFymlxulvnhPWE8P3H-4fauCqjMZlCfkHmNqXWoVEuiWuUaFXZov-byNYKqbXdEqJVffp-xoiuv3q2aB_xj-MtZda7acUcfZfx_Q_H-_5IYDKl7BywE5ioN-xLvwBNvX8GKDT_AN3K0pRsSiFn3i3xLFIXPjDmWtRNOKzj3VvMOWHnfOWR9XnMkoftKvEVeCUCz3rV21HObzxHykBBe3jRPUXhQNg1Ux73efi9OuEPVbuCjmv74fR0OFhcinuVxFIXVxiHWIra8MBasJRUMuRoKExsvY18EYpnCkGKr2CeZk_bb2qXG5JyCjMNfvYKddtPgBhPE1Gm90lnmb0MESLrLOkOisC3Q-gWT9qUs_0I9zFYzrksIQllB5r4Qm8G3s9rvn33iow4zlODZm-uzuAilVOShV-ZBSTWBvrQXlYNN_Sq4cYOkXF9O7fBlvkzXyEotrcXFDbTSFyzZNND3ifa8040i0zHiRO59AvqVOW0PdvtM2Vx3jd0YS0FZ-fIx3-wTPCfRZ9r8q2YOd1fIGPxOwWlVTeGqKoyk8O5gdzgo6zuZn5z-mnWX9BdiVKKU
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcgAOiDcLBYwEx9DEdhL7gBDQXba0WyHRSr2lju3QSCgp2y2IE_-I38hMXttFFZx62tX6IWtnPDOf7fkG4EUaWRd5xwOHsQMCFNyKymoeeBkKnfPERZbOO2Z7yfRAfjyMD9fgd58LQ88qe5vYGGpXWzoj3yTedo0KFoo3J98CqhpFt6t9CY1WLXb8zx8I2U5fb2-hfF9yPhnvv58GXVWBwMZptAhcbEIXChdqmysEaBIRgAk9hkHKRqEtnFJEW4i4obDSp6jxurCxMqlF5819KnDeK3BVCvTklJk--bA80xE8xgCjTRTC9nAzL2u_5BVMaMdoteICm0oBF4W3f7_SPOf2JrfgZhevsretgt2GNV_dgRvnWAzvwq-e2ITVBWvTDeeebREjb1dMi5UVa5xiQe96cbpPlGtyTPmT7DMaZL9gGDvT2MLk8-4UkY0HInL2vTQM-7NJSSEyG7dv3tmsKX99Dw4uRQL3Yb2qK_8QmLKFV1aJJLFa4ofGaEwbVSAsNA6_j0D2f3VmO9Jzqr3xNUPwQxLKLpTQCF4Nw05a1o__DXhHchw6E2l380M9_5J1NiDT3HFcmeMWQWjoY21izT3ixygVnnucZKPXgqyzJKfZUu9H8HxoRhtAFzum8vUZ9hEI0nUsBU7xoFWaYSUiSuhqPR1BuqJOK0tdbanK44ZnPEEJCB09-veynsG16f5sN9vd3tt5DNcxoNTk27ncgPXF_Mw_waBtkT9tdgqDo8vemn8ApGFZMQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrYToAfFmoYCR4Bg2sfOwDwhRdlctpasVUKm34NgOjVQlZbsFceJ_8euYyWu7qIJTT1kltmXtPDyfPf4G4EUSGBs4yz2LsQMCFDRFaRT3XOgLlfHYBob2Ow5m8e5h-P4oOtqA391dGEqr7Hxi7ahtZWiPfES87QoVzBejvE2LmI-nb06_eVRBik5au3IajYrsu58_EL6dvd4bo6xfcj6dfH6367UVBjwTJcHSs5H2rS-sr0wmEayFiAa07zAkkibwTW6lJApDxBC5CV2C2q9yE0mdGFzIuUsEjnsNNhNCRQPY3JnM5h9XOzyCRxhuNNeGhFD-KCsqt2IZjMl-lFxbEOu6AZcFu3_nbF5YBKe34GYbvbK3jbrdhg1X3oGtC5yGd-FXR3PCqpw1lw8Xjo2Jn7ctrcWKktVLZE5ZvjjcnG6eHNNtSvYJ3bNbMoykqW-us0W7p8gmPS05-15ohu3ZtKCAmU2aDHh2UBfDvgeHVyKD-zAoq9I9BCZN7qSRIo6NCvGhMDZTWuYIErXF30MIu786NS0FOlXiOEkRCpGE0kslNIRXfbfThgPkfx12SI59Y6Lwrl9Ui69p6xFSxS3HmVluEJL6LlI6UtwhmgwS4bjDQbY7LUhbv3KWrqxgCM_7z-gR6JhHl646xzYCIbuKQoFDPGiUpp-JCGI6aE-GkKyp09pU17-UxXHNOh6jBIQKHv17Ws_gOppl-mFvtv8YbmB0qWih5-E2DJaLc_cEI7hl9rQ1FQZfrto6_wAln17D
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis+of+Pressure+Distribution+in+Transfemoral+Prosthetic+Socket+for+Prefabrication+Evaluation+via+the+Finite+Element+Method&rft.jtitle=Bioengineering+%28Basel%29&rft.au=Mohd+Syahmi+Jamaludin&rft.au=Akihiko+Hanafusa&rft.au=Yamamoto+Shinichirou&rft.au=Yukio+Agarie&rft.date=2019-10-24&rft.pub=MDPI+AG&rft.eissn=2306-5354&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=98&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390%2Fbioengineering6040098&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_92d2f61d2c1140e59a592e666173e2e8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2306-5354&client=summon