Optimal strategies for COVID-19 prevention from global evidence achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown: a systematic review
Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this stu...
Saved in:
| Published in | Archives of public health = Archives belges de santé publique Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 1 - 18 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
21.08.2021
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2049-3258 0778-7367 2049-3258 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13690-021-00663-8 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices. Methods/design This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form. Results A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7-9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R.sub.0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective. Conclusion Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. Keywords: COVID-19, Social distancing, Stay at home, Travel restriction and lockdown |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices. Methods/design This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form. Results A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7-9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R.sub.0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective. Conclusion Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. Keywords: COVID-19, Social distancing, Stay at home, Travel restriction and lockdown Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices. Methods/design This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form. Results A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7–9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective. Conclusion Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices. This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form. A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7-9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R.sub.0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective. Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. Abstract Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices. Methods/design This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form. Results A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7–9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective. Conclusion Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices.BACKGROUNDCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can alter the pandemic. However, the effectiveness of existing preventive measures and strategies is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to review evidence related to COVID-19 prevention achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown in order to determine best practices.This review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form.METHODS/DESIGNThis review has been conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and Cochrane guideline. A systematic literature search of articles archived from major medical databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and Google scholar was done. Observational and modeling researches published to date with information on COVID-19 prevention like social distancing, stay at home, travel ban and lockdown were included. The articles were screened by two experts. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed through ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach for the main outcomes. The findings were presented by narration and in tabular form.A total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7-9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective.RESULTSA total of 25 studies was included in the review. The studies consistently reported the benefit of social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown measures. Mandatory social distancing reduced the daily growth rate by 9.1%, contacts by 7-9 folds, median number of infections by 92% and epidemic resolved in day 90. Travel restriction and lockdown averted 70.5% of exported cases in china and doubling time was increased from 2 to 4 days. It reduced contacts by 80% and decreased the initial R0, and the number of infected individuals decreased by 91.14%. Stay at home was associated with a 48.6 and 59.8% reduction in weekly morbidity and fatality. Obligatory, long term and early initiated programs were more effective.Social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported.CONCLUSIONSocial distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown are effective to COVID-19 prevention. The strategies need to be obligatory, initiated early, implemented in large scale, and for a longer period of time. Combinations of the programs are more effective. However, the income of individuals should be guaranteed and supported. |
| ArticleNumber | 150 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Shimbre, Mulugeta Shegaze Shewamare, Sisay Girum, Tadele Lentiro, Kifle Geremew, Mulugeta Migora, Biru |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Tadele surname: Girum fullname: Girum, Tadele – sequence: 2 givenname: Kifle surname: Lentiro fullname: Lentiro, Kifle – sequence: 3 givenname: Mulugeta surname: Geremew fullname: Geremew, Mulugeta – sequence: 4 givenname: Biru surname: Migora fullname: Migora, Biru – sequence: 5 givenname: Sisay surname: Shewamare fullname: Shewamare, Sisay – sequence: 6 givenname: Mulugeta Shegaze orcidid: 0000-0001-5633-1309 surname: Shimbre fullname: Shimbre, Mulugeta Shegaze |
| BookMark | eNp9ks2O0zAUhSM0iPmBF2BlCQmxmAy2E9sxC6RR-as0UjfA1nIdO3FJ7GKnHc0L8ZzctoOYjhDKwtHNd8-9OT7nxUmIwRbFS4KvCGn420wqLnGJKSkx5rwqmyfFGcW1LCvKmpMH76fFec4rjKmEyrPitKprIknNzopfi_XkRz2gPCU92c7bjFxMaLb4Pv9QEonWyW5tmHwMyKU4om6IS8Dt1rc2GIu06T0QLZr6FDddj3I0HoDW50kH40N3Cdr6DukJ9XG0lwgGbe2AkoWR3uyVdWjREM2PNt6Gd0ijfJcnO-rJG8C23t4-L546PWT74v68KL59-vh19qW8WXyez65vSsMEmUohNaZsybhrsHbOtVJUZtlUFcesYUI0beWEw7iqas4olpxIzJwQknHGheHVRTE_6LZRr9Q6gTXpTkXt1b4QU6d0grUGq6RxWGhDCGHLWtZMWqrrFnNjLW9AG7TeH7TWm-VoWwMuJj0ciR5_Cb5XXdyqpmowwbtl3twLpPhzA3ap0Wdjh0EHGzdZUcYhAEIQDOirR-gqblIAq4ASlFEKKfhLdRp-wAcXYa7ZiaprLhglsuYUqKt_UPC0dvQGIug81I8aXj9o6K0epj7HYbO72nwMNgfQpJhzsk4ZP-kdBhP8oAhWu2CrQ7AVBFvtg612q9NHrX98_E_Tb2Iy-nM |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s13762_024_05610_y crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2023_2276624 crossref_primary_10_1128_jcm_00612_23 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpra_2022_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1515_med_2023_0674 crossref_primary_10_2196_50303 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14574_y crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11247275 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2023_1037496 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11081191 crossref_primary_10_1111_1745_5871_12561 crossref_primary_10_3390_children12020178 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_50320 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1336 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1219 crossref_primary_10_1080_10410236_2024_2413762 crossref_primary_10_4103_aihb_aihb_53_23 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e13879 crossref_primary_10_54393_pjhs_v4i11_821 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1421 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_024_09007_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2024_2388125 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11142101 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13164766 crossref_primary_10_1093_jtm_taac081 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_14947 crossref_primary_10_1080_09540121_2022_2049197 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41182_024_00603_6 crossref_primary_10_4103_aihb_aihb_60_22 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1422 crossref_primary_10_3390_life15030355 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines10122141 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines11071195 crossref_primary_10_3390_epidemiologia6010006 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11030288 crossref_primary_10_3390_populations1010005 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24893 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_022_04682_7 crossref_primary_10_12968_jpar_2023_15_2_74 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhin_2022_09_001 crossref_primary_10_2147_IDR_S369266 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0293722 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_024_09136_z crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2022_37_e129 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lanwpc_2022_100581 crossref_primary_10_1002_cesm_12055 crossref_primary_10_1177_00469580231175437 crossref_primary_10_4266_acc_2024_00654 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_14567_x crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1442 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10238_023_01188_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_024_02230_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines10101631 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knosys_2025_113065 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_22_01585_9 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0233744 10.1101/2020.04.13.20063628 10.20944/preprints202005.0201.v1 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 10.2139/ssrn.3577213 10.3390/jcm9020462 10.1007/s11538-020-00726-x 10.1093/oxrep/graa033 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 10.1136/bmj.i4919 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102182 10.1056/NEJMe2005477 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64 10.1101/2020.03.22.20041079 10.1101/2020.03.28.20046110 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6 10.1101/2020.03.19.20039107 10.1002/pad.1891 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 10.1101/2020.03.29.20046870 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X 10.1101/2020.04.13.20063933 10.1101/2020.05.07.20092353 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 10.1126/science.aba9757 10.1073/pnas.2002616117 10.1101/2020.03.02.20026708 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104440 10.1093/jtm/taaa037 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9 10.1017/dmp.2021.9 10.1186/s41182-020-00285-w 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608 10.1002/9781119536604 10.2139/ssrn.3576703 10.1002/14651858.CD013574 10.1101/2020.04.23.20077024 10.1177/0272989X12454577 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2021. The Author(s). The Author(s) 2021 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2021. The Author(s). – notice: The Author(s) 2021 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 8C1 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13690-021-00663-8 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Public Health Database ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Public Health |
| EISSN | 2049-3258 |
| EndPage | 18 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9cf07ac1115b49459e2a4d06cee68209 PMC8380106 A675219462 10_1186_s13690_021_00663_8 |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 2WC 2XV 4.4 5VS 8C1 AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC C6C CCPQU CITATION DIK EBLON EBS ECGQY EIHBH FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HYE IAO IHR IHW ITC KQ8 M48 M~E OK1 P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ UKHRP W2D XSB PMFND AZQEC COVID DWQXO PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-79a025b56f80afffd973cb83360585778d3f7f003346520961905f77956567c63 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 2049-3258 0778-7367 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:25 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:12:28 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 09:58:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:21:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:03:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:36:12 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:20:19 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:18:36 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c571t-79a025b56f80afffd973cb83360585778d3f7f003346520961905f77956567c63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5633-1309 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s13690-021-00663-8 |
| PMID | 34419145 |
| PQID | 2572522258 |
| PQPubID | 4665242 |
| PageCount | 18 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9cf07ac1115b49459e2a4d06cee68209 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8380106 proquest_miscellaneous_2563697710 proquest_journals_2572522258 gale_infotracmisc_A675219462 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A675219462 gale_healthsolutions_A675219462 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13690_021_00663_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13690_021_00663_8 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-08-21 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-08-21 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2021 text: 2021-08-21 day: 21 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Archives of public health = Archives belges de santé publique |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | A Brodeur (663_CR21) 2020 K Prem (663_CR34) 2020; 5 663_CR40 JAC Sterne (663_CR13) 2016; 355 663_CR20 663_CR42 663_CR22 M Chinazzi (663_CR27) 2020; 368 663_CR44 Y Kebede (663_CR24) 2020; 15 663_CR46 663_CR23 C Huang (663_CR6) 2020; 395 663_CR25 663_CR47 RL Morgan (663_CR15) 2016; 92–93 663_CR16 663_CR19 CR Wells (663_CR17) 2020; 117 B Tang (663_CR38) 2020; 9 Z Yang (663_CR39) 2020; 12 LR Baden (663_CR9) 2020; 382 S Eubank (663_CR35) 2020; 82 D Moher (663_CR11) 2015; 4 T Girum (663_CR41) 2020; 48 P Block (663_CR33) 2020; 4 663_CR2 W Guan (663_CR3) 2020; 382 Z Xu (663_CR8) 2020; 8 663_CR1 663_CR4 E Ekienabor (663_CR26) 2020 663_CR30 663_CR10 663_CR32 663_CR12 JJ Caro (663_CR14) 2012; 32 S Kissler (663_CR31) 2020 663_CR36 663_CR28 JF Chan (663_CR7) 2020; 395 C Coombs (663_CR45) 2020; 55 H Lau (663_CR18) 2020; 27 B Cao (663_CR5) 2020; 382 DK Chu (663_CR43) 2020; S0140–6736 DM Kennedy (663_CR37) 2020; 128 W Broniec (663_CR29) 2020 |
| References_xml | – volume: 15 start-page: e0233744 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR24 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233744 – ident: 663_CR25 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.13.20063628 – start-page: 2020050201 volume-title: Coronavirus (Covid-19): The Lockdown Strategy in Nigeria year: 2020 ident: 663_CR26 doi: 10.20944/preprints202005.0201.v1 – volume: 5 start-page: e261 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR34 publication-title: Lancet Public Health doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 – ident: 663_CR19 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3577213 – volume: 9 start-page: 462 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR38 publication-title: J Clin Med doi: 10.3390/jcm9020462 – volume: 82 start-page: 52 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR35 publication-title: Bull Math Biol doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00726-x – ident: 663_CR46 doi: 10.1093/oxrep/graa033 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 663_CR11 publication-title: Syst Rev doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 – volume: 92–93 start-page: 611 year: 2016 ident: 663_CR15 publication-title: Environ Int doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004 – volume: 382 start-page: 1708 issue: 18 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR3 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 – volume: 355 start-page: i4919 year: 2016 ident: 663_CR13 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919 – volume: 55 start-page: 102182 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR45 publication-title: Int J Inf Manag doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102182 – volume: 382 start-page: 1851 issue: 19 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR9 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2005477 – volume: 12 start-page: 165 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR39 publication-title: J Thorac Dis doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64 – ident: 663_CR1 – start-page: 13255 volume-title: IZA DP year: 2020 ident: 663_CR21 – volume-title: Social distancing strategies for curbing the COVID-19 epidemic year: 2020 ident: 663_CR31 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.22.20041079 – ident: 663_CR23 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.28.20046110 – volume: 4 start-page: 588 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR33 publication-title: Nat Hum Behav doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6 – ident: 663_CR30 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.19.20039107 – ident: 663_CR47 doi: 10.1002/pad.1891 – volume: S0140–6736 start-page: 31142 issue: 20 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR43 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 – ident: 663_CR32 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.29.20046870 – volume: 8 start-page: 420 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR8 publication-title: Lancet Respir Med doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X – ident: 663_CR40 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.13.20063933 – ident: 663_CR20 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.07.20092353 – volume: 382 start-page: 1787 issue: 19 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR5 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282 – volume-title: Using VERA to explain the impact of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR29 – volume: 395 start-page: 497 issue: 10223 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR6 publication-title: China Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 – volume: 368 start-page: 395 issue: 6489 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR27 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.aba9757 – volume: 117 start-page: 7504 issue: 13 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR17 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002616117 – ident: 663_CR16 doi: 10.1101/2020.03.02.20026708 – volume: 128 start-page: 104440 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR37 publication-title: J Clin Virol doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104440 – volume: 27 start-page: taaa037 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR18 publication-title: J Travel Med doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa037 – ident: 663_CR2 – volume: 395 start-page: 514 issue: 10223 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR7 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9 – ident: 663_CR4 – ident: 663_CR44 doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.9 – volume: 48 start-page: 91 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 663_CR41 publication-title: Trop Med Health doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00285-w – ident: 663_CR22 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608 – ident: 663_CR12 doi: 10.1002/9781119536604 – ident: 663_CR28 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3576703 – ident: 663_CR10 – ident: 663_CR42 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574 – ident: 663_CR36 doi: 10.1101/2020.04.23.20077024 – volume: 32 start-page: 667 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 663_CR14 publication-title: Med Decis Mak doi: 10.1177/0272989X12454577 |
| SSID | ssj0029049 |
| Score | 2.4542284 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention... Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but prevention strategies can... Abstract Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global public health agenda with high level of pandemicity. There is no effective treatment, but... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Analysis Asymptomatic Bans China Coronaviruses COVID-19 Disease prevention Epidemics Health aspects Infections Medical research Pandemics Prevention Public health Respiratory diseases Sanctions (International law) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social distancing Stay at home Subject heading schemes Systematic Review Travel Travel restriction and lockdown Travel restrictions |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Jb9UwELZQT0gIsYpAC4OExIFGfVm8cSuFqiBBLxT1ZjmOrVa0eVVfeuAP9XcyYzuPBiS4cI0nUewZz2LPfMPYq85pJVQfSh-4p2tGWyq-sGVtO95zH6wPVI38-Ys4OGo_HfPjG62-KCcswQOnhdvRLiykdbgledfqlmtf27ZfCFTuAq1XLN1DmzcFUznU0uj4TiUySuysqgajwJLSEaKNLdXMDEW0_j918u95kjcMz_49djd7jLCb_vQ-u-WHB-xOOm6DVEX0kF0f4tY_R7LVOGE_ALqjsHf47eP7stJwkaGalgNQRQkkIBDwuakoUE4lUvSQG_dAOkyHnvzLwaGB28Zv2x9gRzhZnvttGKlx0RlQb4_L01gdAXboAY3j9x5D-7dg4RdMNKQSmUfsaP_D172DMrdgKB2X1VhKbdEp6rgIamFDCL2WjetU09BtKpdS9U2QgRrCtYISajAcW_AgpSY_UTrRPGYbw3LwTxjUrhauqwR3VD-lRdfRnTe6N7LxFp2YglUTR4zL-OTUJuPMxDhFCZO4aJCLJnLRqIK9Wb9zkdA5_kr9jhi9piRk7fgA5c1keTP_kreCvSAxMalMda0fzC5GXqj9W1EX7HWkIA2BE3A2FzrgMhDW1oxyc0aJO9vNhydRNFmzrAyq2JpTkI7TebkepjcpW27wyyuiETh3ic5jweRMhGdzn48MpycRXVw1is4Jnv6PxXrGbtdx06E2rjbZxnh55bfQiRu753G__gTUtUQs priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZge0FCiKcILTBISBxo1M3DLy6oLa0KEi1CFPVmOY5NK9pku5se-EP8TmYS75aA1Gs82cg7nplvxvNg7HXltBKqDqkP3NM1o00Vn9o0txWvuQ_WB6pG_nwoDo7LTyf8JAbcFjGtcqkTe0Vdt45i5Ft4tHJOzol6P7tMaWoU3a7GERq32RqqYMUnbG1n7_DL15XLpREAL0tllNhaZAV6gymlJfS2NlUjc9R37f9fN_-bL_mXAdq_z-5F5AjbA6sfsFu-ecjuDmE3GKqJHrHfR6gCLpBs0S17QADCUtg9-v7xQ5ppmMWWTW0DVFkCQ0MQ8HG4KFBuJVLUEAf4wBBUh5pwZuPQ0G3ib9tfYDs4bS_8JnQ0wOgcaMbH_KyvkgDb1IBG8meNLv47sHDdLhqGUpnH7Hh_79vuQRpHMaSOy6xLpbYIjiougpraEEKtZeEqVRR0q8qlVHURZKDBcKWgxBp0y6Y8SKkJL0oniids0rSNf8ogd7lwVSa4ozoqLaqK7r4R5sjCWwQzCcuWHDEu9imncRnnpvdXlDADFw1y0fRcNCphb1fvzIYuHTdS7xCjV5TUYbt_0M5_mCiwRrswldahKeBVqUuufW7LeioQVAhETTphL-mYmKFcdaUnzDZ6YGgFSpEn7E1PQZoCN-BsLHjAv4F6bo0oN0aUKOFuvLw8iiZqmIW5loeEvVot05uUNdf49opoBO5dIohMmBwd4dHexyvN2WnfZVwViuIFz27--Dq7k_fihPo222CTbn7lnyNM66oXURb_AM37PVM priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Optimal strategies for COVID-19 prevention from global evidence achieved through social distancing, stay at home, travel restriction and lockdown: a systematic review |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2572522258 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2563697710 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8380106 https://doaj.org/article/9cf07ac1115b49459e2a4d06cee68209 |
| Volume | 79 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3raxQxEA99fBFEfOJpPSMIfrCr-8pLELmeLfWgragn_Ray2cQWr3v1bgv2H_LvdCa7e7pa-ulgM9kjOzOZ3yTzIOR5YZXksvSR88zhNaOJJItNlJqClcx54zxmIx8c8v1pPjlmx2uka3fUfsDlla4d9pOaLmavfv64fAcK_zYovOSvl0kGPl6EwQbBgkZynWyCZeIo5Qf56lYhVQCHu8SZK-f1jFOo4f__Tv1v9ORf5mjvNrnV4kg6ahh_h6y56i652RzC0Sa36B75dQQbwhmQLeuuIgQFkErHR18_vI8SRc_bAk7zimKeCW3Kg1DXthqlGGkJFCVt2_nQ5oidlog6KwtmbxvebS6pqenJ_Mxt0xrbGc0odvxYnIacCWqqkoLJ_F6Cw_-GGvqneDRtEmfuk-ne7pfxftQ2ZogsE0kdCWUAKhWMexkb732pRGYLmWV4x8qEkGXmhcc2cTnHMBtw0mLmhVCIHoXl2QOyUc0r95DQ1KbcFglnFrOqFC8KvAkH0CMyZwDaDEjScUTbtmo5Ns-Y6eC9SK4bLmrgog5c1HJAXq7mnDc1O66l3kFGryix3nZ4MF980636amV9LIwFw8CKXOVMudTkZcwBYnDAUGpAnqKY6CZ5dbVr6BH4Y2ATcp4OyItAgZIMC7CmTX-Az4AVuHqUWz1K0HfbH-5EUXfqomHjTRm67rCcZ6thnIkxdJWbXyANh7ULgJQDInoi3Ft7f6Q6PQk1x2Um8fTg0fV__pjcSIM6we6bbJGNenHhngBoq4shWZfjZEg2R6PJ5wn87uwefvw0DEcgw6ClvwEBwEQL |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELZK-wASQpwiUKiRQDzQqJvDFxJCPbWl7RahFvXNOI5NK9pk2U1V9Q_xyG9kJseWgNS3vsbjRM6MZ76x5yDkdWaV5DL3ofPM4TWjCSUbmDA2GcuZ88Z5zEbeG_HhYfrpiB3Nkd9dLgyGVXY6sVbUeWnxjHwFRCtm6JzIj-OfIXaNwtvVroVGIxY77vICXLbph-0N4O-bON7aPFgfhm1XgdAyEVWhUAbsfMa4lwPjvc-VSGwmkwQvCJkQMk-88NjjLOUYIwIexoB5IRRCH2F5Au-9RRYAZijYRQtrm6PPX2YungLA3aXmSL4yjRLwPkMMg6hteyh75q_uEvC_Lfg3PvMvg7d1n9xrkSpdbUTrAZlzxUNytznmo0320iPyax9UzhmQTauu5gQFGEzX979ub4SRouO2RFRZUMxkoU0BEuraZqYUYzmBIqdtwyDaHOLTHHFtYcGwLsO7zSU1FT0uz9wyrbBh0inFniKTkzorg5oip2CUf-TlRfGeGnpVnpo2qTmPyeGNMOkJmS_Kwj0lNLYxt1nEmcW8LcWzDO_aAVaJxBkATwGJOo5o29ZFx_Ycp7r2jyTXDRc1cFHXXNQyIO9mc8ZNVZBrqdeQ0TNKrOhdPygn33WrILSyfiCMBdPDslSlTLnYpPmAA4jhgNJUQJZQTHSTHjvTS3oVPD6wOimPA_K2pkDNBAuwpk2wgN-ANb56lIs9StAotj_ciaJuNdpUX-2_gLyaDeNMjNIrXHmONBzWLgC0BkT0RLi39v5IcXJcVzWXicTziWfXf3yJ3B4e7O3q3e3RznNyJ663Fuj6aJHMV5Nz9wIgYpW9bPclJd9uWhX8Ae-TdwA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal+strategies+for+COVID-19+prevention+from+global+evidence+achieved+through+social+distancing%2C+stay+at+home%2C+travel+restriction+and+lockdown%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+public+health+%3D+Archives+belges+de+sant%C3%A9+publique&rft.au=Girum%2C+Tadele&rft.au=Kifle+Lentiro&rft.au=Geremew%2C+Mulugeta&rft.au=Migora%2C+Biru&rft.date=2021-08-21&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=2049-3258&rft.volume=79&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13690-021-00663-8 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-3258&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-3258&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-3258&client=summon |