Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question?

The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReproductive biology and endocrinology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 50 - 10
Main Authors Ferreux, Lucile, Bourdon, Mathilde, Chargui, Ahmed, Firmin, Julie, Maignien, Chloé, Santulli, Pietro, Patrat, Catherine, Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 24.04.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Not applicable.
AbstractList Abstract Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. Methods A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner’s classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05–6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Conclusions Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Not applicable.
The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.
Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. Methods A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Conclusions Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Clinical trial number Not applicable. Keywords: Assisted reproductive technologies, Single frozen blastocyst transfer, Prolonged embryo culture, Day 6 blastocyst
The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.BACKGROUNDThe Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.METHODSA total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.RESULTSThe LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.CONCLUSIONSOur results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.Not applicable.CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERNot applicable.
ArticleNumber 50
Audience Academic
Author Firmin, Julie
Chargui, Ahmed
Maignien, Chloé
Bourdon, Mathilde
Santulli, Pietro
Ferreux, Lucile
Patrat, Catherine
Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lucile
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4822-9176
  surname: Ferreux
  fullname: Ferreux, Lucile
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mathilde
  surname: Bourdon
  fullname: Bourdon, Mathilde
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ahmed
  surname: Chargui
  fullname: Chargui, Ahmed
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Julie
  surname: Firmin
  fullname: Firmin, Julie
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Chloé
  surname: Maignien
  fullname: Maignien, Chloé
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Pietro
  surname: Santulli
  fullname: Santulli, Pietro
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Catherine
  surname: Patrat
  fullname: Patrat, Catherine
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Khaled
  surname: Pocate-Cheriet
  fullname: Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38659014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://u-paris.hal.science/hal-04581640$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp9kktr3DAUhU1JaR7tH-iiCLppF06vZNmSuwlDyAsGumnXQpKvZhQ8Vip5Eqa_vppxEjKhFC0krr5zdK84x8XBEAYsio8UTimVzbdEWVvLEhgvgTLKy4c3xRHlQpRCMnHw4nxYHKd0C8AAZPOuOKxkU7dA-VFxcRkxLUmIxMXwBwfS6Q1piOl1GoPdpJGMUQ_JYfxOfCLjEiOSNPq-J5r8XmM-huHsffHW6T7hh8f9pPh1efHz_Lqc_7i6OZ_NS1sLGEsrHKfa8VY6gdqCZh1j2BpBG2paYSxa7YRx2NWGOahBdkaj0ygQagq0OiluJt8u6Ft1F_1Kx40K2qtdIcSF0nH0tkfVac4711htqOG2qjRUBpu2M9YIhtZlr7PJ625tVthZHPKk_Z7p_s3gl2oR7hWlwEFSmR2-Tg7LV7rr2Vxta8BrSRsO99vOvzy-FsPu29TKJ4t9rwcM66Qq4E1NGa-qjH6e0IXOc_jBhfy83eJqJlpaN61oIVOn_6Dy6nDlbQ6K87m-J_j0ct7nhp-ykAE2ATaGlCK6Z4SC2gZOTYFTOXBqFzj1kEXylcj6UW9Dkdvx_f-kfwHW59qE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_024_07712_x
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053
10.1007/s10815-021-02380-1
10.1007/s10815-017-1038-8
10.1007/s10815-021-02110-7
10.1093/humrep/deu033
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61134-0
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018
10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
10.1093/humrep/deu299
10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.007
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032
10.1371/journal.pone.0194800
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003
10.1093/humrep/dey351
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092
10.1093/humrep/dez163
10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00203.x
10.1093/humrep/dex234
10.1093/humrep/der325
10.1001/jama.2021.4788
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.001
10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102414
10.1056/NEJMc1611871
10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006
10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
Attribution
The Author(s) 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Attribution
– notice: The Author(s) 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12958-024-01214-w
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE



MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1477-7827
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf
PMC11040818
oai_HAL_hal_04581640v1
A791569790
38659014
10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations France
GeographicLocations_xml – name: France
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  grantid: ANR-21-CE014-0085-21
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29P
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AN0
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICW
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-c7f41af498f7eac0a2d22e9b7161b97bcecaf7bfed5b2f0508dbaefae7e051013
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1477-7827
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:18 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:34:40 EDT 2025
Fri May 09 12:22:44 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:00:38 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:12:59 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:08:32 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:45:11 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:55 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Single frozen blastocyst transfer
Day 6 blastocyst
Assisted reproductive technologies
Prolonged embryo culture
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c570t-c7f41af498f7eac0a2d22e9b7161b97bcecaf7bfed5b2f0508dbaefae7e051013
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-4822-9176
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12958-024-01214-w
PMID 38659014
PQID 3046512433
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11040818
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04581640v1
proquest_miscellaneous_3046512433
gale_infotracmisc_A791569790
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791569790
pubmed_primary_38659014
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-04-24
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-24
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-04-24
  day: 24
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Reproductive biology and endocrinology
PublicationTitleAlternate Reprod Biol Endocrinol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References BS Shapiro (1214_CR15) 2014; 102
M Bourdon (1214_CR9) 2018; 13
BS Shapiro (1214_CR6) 2008; 89
SA Carson (1214_CR8) 2021; 326
AM Kolte (1214_CR14) 2015; 30
M Irani (1214_CR5) 2018; 110
S Yamamoto (1214_CR17) 2008; 7
S Loubersac (1214_CR7) 2022; 51
BS Shapiro (1214_CR18) 2013; 99
K Ozgur (1214_CR21) 2021; 38
A Capalbo (1214_CR24) 2014; 29
TH Taylor (1214_CR4) 2014; 29
Z-J Chen (1214_CR12) 2016; 375
E Van den Abbeel (1214_CR22) 2013; 27
A Ahlström (1214_CR19) 2011; 26
M Bourdon (1214_CR2) 2019; 34
MJ Hill (1214_CR20) 2013; 99
A Abdala (1214_CR23) 2022; 39
Y Murata (1214_CR16) 2005; 11
J Haas (1214_CR25) 2019; 111
S Tannus (1214_CR26) 2019; 34
F Zegers-Hochschild (1214_CR13) 2017; 32
DK Gardner (1214_CR10) 1998; 13
C Maignien (1214_CR11) 2022; 44
A Kaing (1214_CR3) 2018; 35
R Cutting (1214_CR1) 2018; 53
References_xml – volume: 111
  start-page: 105
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1214_CR25
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053
– volume: 39
  start-page: 379
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 1214_CR23
  publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02380-1
– volume: 35
  start-page: 119
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1214_CR3
  publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1038-8
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1077
  issue: 5
  year: 2021
  ident: 1214_CR21
  publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02110-7
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1173
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 1214_CR24
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033
– volume: 11
  start-page: 428
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: 1214_CR16
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61134-0
– volume: 102
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 1214_CR15
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018
– volume: 13
  start-page: 3434
  issue: 12
  year: 1998
  ident: 1214_CR10
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
– volume: 30
  start-page: 495
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 1214_CR14
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu299
– volume: 44
  start-page: 469
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 1214_CR11
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.007
– volume: 110
  start-page: 95
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 1214_CR5
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032
– volume: 13
  start-page: e0194800
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 1214_CR9
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194800
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1283
  issue: 5
  year: 2013
  ident: 1214_CR20
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003
– volume: 34
  start-page: 44
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 1214_CR26
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey351
– volume: 89
  start-page: 20
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 1214_CR6
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1948
  issue: 10
  year: 2019
  ident: 1214_CR2
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez163
– volume: 7
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  ident: 1214_CR17
  publication-title: Reprod Med Biol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00203.x
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1786
  issue: 9
  year: 2017
  ident: 1214_CR13
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex234
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3289
  issue: 12
  year: 2011
  ident: 1214_CR19
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/der325
– volume: 326
  start-page: 65
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 1214_CR8
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4788
– volume: 99
  start-page: 389
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 1214_CR18
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044
– volume: 53
  start-page: 30
  year: 2018
  ident: 1214_CR1
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.001
– volume: 51
  start-page: 102414
  issue: 7
  year: 2022
  ident: 1214_CR7
  publication-title: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102414
– volume: 375
  start-page: e42
  issue: 20
  year: 2016
  ident: 1214_CR12
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1611871
– volume: 27
  start-page: 353
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 1214_CR22
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006
– volume: 29
  start-page: 305
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 1214_CR4
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001
SSID ssj0020086
Score 2.402082
Snippet The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo...
Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified...
Abstract Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 50
SubjectTerms Adult
Analysis
Assisted reproductive technologies
Birth Rate
Blastocyst
Blastocyst - cytology
Cryopreservation - methods
Cryopreservation of organs, tissues, etc
Day 6 blastocyst
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryo transplantation
Female
Fertilization in vitro
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Humans
Life Sciences
Live Birth
Methods
Patient outcomes
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Prolonged embryo culture
Retrospective Studies
Single frozen blastocyst transfer
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagJy6IUh6BggxCcEBWE8dxYi5oQV2tEHCiUm-Wn9pKS4J201bLr2fGya4akODCNXESZx6eb-LJN4S8kk2MTWVzZqyXTFhbMWOEZ6Xj3FvjRJPat335Khdn4tN5dX6j1RfWhA30wIPgTrwRwkfpjC2scGVp8tIGqbx1tubBRVx9Iebtkqkx1UKkvvtFppEnG4hqVcMgHjHkMBPsehKGElv_fk2-vcSSyD_x5u9lkzfi0PweuTsCSDobJn5IboX2PjmatZA8f9_S1zSVdKZv5UfkdA7J9JJ2axrX3c_QUm-2VFILiLnv3HbT0z7h1rB-Ry82FLFgoODzqxU1NE0LtPb-ATmbn377uGBj3wTmqjrvmaujKEwUqok1rKu54Z7zoCykRoVVtXXBmVjbGHxlecwBooFWQjShDslFy4fkoO3a8JhQ6ZSVXDUmeoAueVA-YpchgW39QDE2I8VOjNqNpOLY22KlU3LRSD2IXoPodRK9vs7I2_01PwZKjb-O_oDa2Y9EOux0AIxEj0ai_2UkGXmDutXotDA9Z8Z_D-Alkf5Kz2oFeayqVZ6R48lIcDY3Of0SrGMymcXss8ZjuOMMuWd-VWTkxc54NF6PZWxt6C43GrehAWGJsszIo8GY9vfC5qu4p52RZmJmk4dNz7QXy0QIDhBOIDXhk_8hq6fkDk-OIhgXx-SgX1-GZwC8evs8-dgvHlotcw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38659014
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3046512433
https://u-paris.hal.science/hal-04581640
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11040818
https://doaj.org/article/da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfW7YUXBIyPwKgMQvCADGni2AkSmlrUqkJsQhOVKl4sf66TSgJpxih_PWc3rQhMPPGSh8ROnPOd73c5534IPWO5c3mmYiKVYYQqlREpqSGpThKjpKZ5oG87OWXTGX0_z-Z7aEt31ApwdW1o5_mkZvXy1Y9v62Mw-LfB4HP2egU-K8sJeBviK5RRctVDB-CZuGc0OKG7rIJP9bPtjzPX9us4p1DDf7dS9xZ-o-TfKPTPzZS_eafJLXSzhZV4uNGD22jPlnfQ4bCEkPrLGj_HYaNn-IJ-iMYTCLEXuKqxq6uftsRGrjHDCnB0U-n1qsFNQLO2foMvVtgjRIthJVguscRhWDCXx3fRbDL-9G5KWjYFojMeN0RzRwfS0SJ3HFbbWCYmSWyhIGAaqIIrbbV0XDlrMpW4GIAbzJV10nIbDDe9h_bLqrQPEGa6UCwpcukMAJrYFsZ57iHqyf4kpSpCg60YhW5LjXvGi6UIIUfOxEb0AkQvgujFVYRe7vp83RTa-GfrkZ-dXUtfJDucqOpz0dqcMDAW45iWaqCoTlMZp8qywiiteGK1i9ALP7fCKxcMT8v2jwR4SV8USwx5AdFtwYs4QkedlmCCunP5KWhHZzDT4Qfhz_k8NESk8fdBhJ5slUf4_n5zW2mry5XwyWnAXTRNI3R_o0y7e3lKVp_pjlDeUbPOw7pXyotFKBMOwI76goUP_4esHqEbSTAUShJ6hPab-tI-BjjWqD7q8Tnvo4PR-PTjWT981OgHu4Pj2ejzL1PwOJ0
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fresh+or+frozen+day+6+blastocyst+transfer%3A+is+there+still+a+question%3F&rft.jtitle=Reproductive+biology+and+endocrinology&rft.au=Lucile+Ferreux&rft.au=Mathilde+Bourdon&rft.au=Ahmed+Chargui&rft.au=Julie+Firmin&rft.date=2024-04-24&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1477-7827&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12958-024-01214-w&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon