Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question?
The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregn...
Saved in:
Published in | Reproductive biology and endocrinology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 50 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
24.04.2024
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.
A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.
Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.
Not applicable. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. Methods A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner’s classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05–6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Conclusions Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Clinical trial number Not applicable. The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Not applicable. The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject. Methods A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold. Conclusions Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos. Clinical trial number Not applicable. Keywords: Assisted reproductive technologies, Single frozen blastocyst transfer, Prolonged embryo culture, Day 6 blastocyst The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.BACKGROUNDThe Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.METHODSA total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.RESULTSThe LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.CONCLUSIONSOur results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.Not applicable.CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERNot applicable. |
ArticleNumber | 50 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Firmin, Julie Chargui, Ahmed Maignien, Chloé Bourdon, Mathilde Santulli, Pietro Ferreux, Lucile Patrat, Catherine Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lucile orcidid: 0000-0002-4822-9176 surname: Ferreux fullname: Ferreux, Lucile – sequence: 2 givenname: Mathilde surname: Bourdon fullname: Bourdon, Mathilde – sequence: 3 givenname: Ahmed surname: Chargui fullname: Chargui, Ahmed – sequence: 4 givenname: Julie surname: Firmin fullname: Firmin, Julie – sequence: 5 givenname: Chloé surname: Maignien fullname: Maignien, Chloé – sequence: 6 givenname: Pietro surname: Santulli fullname: Santulli, Pietro – sequence: 7 givenname: Catherine surname: Patrat fullname: Patrat, Catherine – sequence: 8 givenname: Khaled surname: Pocate-Cheriet fullname: Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38659014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://u-paris.hal.science/hal-04581640$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNp9kktr3DAUhU1JaR7tH-iiCLppF06vZNmSuwlDyAsGumnXQpKvZhQ8Vip5Eqa_vppxEjKhFC0krr5zdK84x8XBEAYsio8UTimVzbdEWVvLEhgvgTLKy4c3xRHlQpRCMnHw4nxYHKd0C8AAZPOuOKxkU7dA-VFxcRkxLUmIxMXwBwfS6Q1piOl1GoPdpJGMUQ_JYfxOfCLjEiOSNPq-J5r8XmM-huHsffHW6T7hh8f9pPh1efHz_Lqc_7i6OZ_NS1sLGEsrHKfa8VY6gdqCZh1j2BpBG2paYSxa7YRx2NWGOahBdkaj0ygQagq0OiluJt8u6Ft1F_1Kx40K2qtdIcSF0nH0tkfVac4711htqOG2qjRUBpu2M9YIhtZlr7PJ625tVthZHPKk_Z7p_s3gl2oR7hWlwEFSmR2-Tg7LV7rr2Vxta8BrSRsO99vOvzy-FsPu29TKJ4t9rwcM66Qq4E1NGa-qjH6e0IXOc_jBhfy83eJqJlpaN61oIVOn_6Dy6nDlbQ6K87m-J_j0ct7nhp-ykAE2ATaGlCK6Z4SC2gZOTYFTOXBqFzj1kEXylcj6UW9Dkdvx_f-kfwHW59qE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_024_07712_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053 10.1007/s10815-021-02380-1 10.1007/s10815-017-1038-8 10.1007/s10815-021-02110-7 10.1093/humrep/deu033 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61134-0 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434 10.1093/humrep/deu299 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.007 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032 10.1371/journal.pone.0194800 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003 10.1093/humrep/dey351 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092 10.1093/humrep/dez163 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00203.x 10.1093/humrep/dex234 10.1093/humrep/der325 10.1001/jama.2021.4788 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.001 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102414 10.1056/NEJMc1611871 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. Attribution The Author(s) 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Attribution – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12958-024-01214-w |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1477-7827 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf PMC11040818 oai_HAL_hal_04581640v1 A791569790 38659014 10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | France |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Agence Nationale de la Recherche grantid: ANR-21-CE014-0085-21 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29P 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AN0 AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICW IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PMFND 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-c7f41af498f7eac0a2d22e9b7161b97bcecaf7bfed5b2f0508dbaefae7e051013 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1477-7827 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:32:18 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:34:40 EDT 2025 Fri May 09 12:22:44 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:00:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:12:59 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:08:32 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:45:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:55 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Single frozen blastocyst transfer Day 6 blastocyst Assisted reproductive technologies Prolonged embryo culture |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c570t-c7f41af498f7eac0a2d22e9b7161b97bcecaf7bfed5b2f0508dbaefae7e051013 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-4822-9176 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12958-024-01214-w |
PMID | 38659014 |
PQID | 3046512433 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11040818 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04581640v1 proquest_miscellaneous_3046512433 gale_infotracmisc_A791569790 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791569790 pubmed_primary_38659014 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12958_024_01214_w |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-04-24 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-04-24 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2024 text: 2024-04-24 day: 24 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Reproductive biology and endocrinology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Reprod Biol Endocrinol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | BS Shapiro (1214_CR15) 2014; 102 M Bourdon (1214_CR9) 2018; 13 BS Shapiro (1214_CR6) 2008; 89 SA Carson (1214_CR8) 2021; 326 AM Kolte (1214_CR14) 2015; 30 M Irani (1214_CR5) 2018; 110 S Yamamoto (1214_CR17) 2008; 7 S Loubersac (1214_CR7) 2022; 51 BS Shapiro (1214_CR18) 2013; 99 K Ozgur (1214_CR21) 2021; 38 A Capalbo (1214_CR24) 2014; 29 TH Taylor (1214_CR4) 2014; 29 Z-J Chen (1214_CR12) 2016; 375 E Van den Abbeel (1214_CR22) 2013; 27 A Ahlström (1214_CR19) 2011; 26 M Bourdon (1214_CR2) 2019; 34 MJ Hill (1214_CR20) 2013; 99 A Abdala (1214_CR23) 2022; 39 Y Murata (1214_CR16) 2005; 11 J Haas (1214_CR25) 2019; 111 S Tannus (1214_CR26) 2019; 34 F Zegers-Hochschild (1214_CR13) 2017; 32 DK Gardner (1214_CR10) 1998; 13 C Maignien (1214_CR11) 2022; 44 A Kaing (1214_CR3) 2018; 35 R Cutting (1214_CR1) 2018; 53 |
References_xml | – volume: 111 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1214_CR25 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053 – volume: 39 start-page: 379 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 1214_CR23 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02380-1 – volume: 35 start-page: 119 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1214_CR3 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1038-8 – volume: 38 start-page: 1077 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 1214_CR21 publication-title: J Assist Reprod Genet doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02110-7 – volume: 29 start-page: 1173 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 1214_CR24 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033 – volume: 11 start-page: 428 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 1214_CR16 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61134-0 – volume: 102 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 1214_CR15 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018 – volume: 13 start-page: 3434 issue: 12 year: 1998 ident: 1214_CR10 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434 – volume: 30 start-page: 495 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1214_CR14 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu299 – volume: 44 start-page: 469 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 1214_CR11 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.007 – volume: 110 start-page: 95 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1214_CR5 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032 – volume: 13 start-page: e0194800 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 1214_CR9 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194800 – volume: 99 start-page: 1283 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 1214_CR20 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.003 – volume: 34 start-page: 44 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1214_CR26 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey351 – volume: 89 start-page: 20 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 1214_CR6 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092 – volume: 34 start-page: 1948 issue: 10 year: 2019 ident: 1214_CR2 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez163 – volume: 7 start-page: 75 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 1214_CR17 publication-title: Reprod Med Biol doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00203.x – volume: 32 start-page: 1786 issue: 9 year: 2017 ident: 1214_CR13 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex234 – volume: 26 start-page: 3289 issue: 12 year: 2011 ident: 1214_CR19 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/der325 – volume: 326 start-page: 65 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1214_CR8 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4788 – volume: 99 start-page: 389 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 1214_CR18 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.044 – volume: 53 start-page: 30 year: 2018 ident: 1214_CR1 publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.001 – volume: 51 start-page: 102414 issue: 7 year: 2022 ident: 1214_CR7 publication-title: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102414 – volume: 375 start-page: e42 issue: 20 year: 2016 ident: 1214_CR12 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1611871 – volume: 27 start-page: 353 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 1214_CR22 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.006 – volume: 29 start-page: 305 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 1214_CR4 publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001 |
SSID | ssj0020086 |
Score | 2.402082 |
Snippet | The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo... Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified... Abstract Background The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 50 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Analysis Assisted reproductive technologies Birth Rate Blastocyst Blastocyst - cytology Cryopreservation - methods Cryopreservation of organs, tissues, etc Day 6 blastocyst Embryo Transfer - methods Embryo transplantation Female Fertilization in vitro Fertilization in Vitro - methods Humans Life Sciences Live Birth Methods Patient outcomes Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Prolonged embryo culture Retrospective Studies Single frozen blastocyst transfer |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagJy6IUh6BggxCcEBWE8dxYi5oQV2tEHCiUm-Wn9pKS4J201bLr2fGya4akODCNXESZx6eb-LJN4S8kk2MTWVzZqyXTFhbMWOEZ6Xj3FvjRJPat335Khdn4tN5dX6j1RfWhA30wIPgTrwRwkfpjC2scGVp8tIGqbx1tubBRVx9Iebtkqkx1UKkvvtFppEnG4hqVcMgHjHkMBPsehKGElv_fk2-vcSSyD_x5u9lkzfi0PweuTsCSDobJn5IboX2PjmatZA8f9_S1zSVdKZv5UfkdA7J9JJ2axrX3c_QUm-2VFILiLnv3HbT0z7h1rB-Ry82FLFgoODzqxU1NE0LtPb-ATmbn377uGBj3wTmqjrvmaujKEwUqok1rKu54Z7zoCykRoVVtXXBmVjbGHxlecwBooFWQjShDslFy4fkoO3a8JhQ6ZSVXDUmeoAueVA-YpchgW39QDE2I8VOjNqNpOLY22KlU3LRSD2IXoPodRK9vs7I2_01PwZKjb-O_oDa2Y9EOux0AIxEj0ai_2UkGXmDutXotDA9Z8Z_D-Alkf5Kz2oFeayqVZ6R48lIcDY3Of0SrGMymcXss8ZjuOMMuWd-VWTkxc54NF6PZWxt6C43GrehAWGJsszIo8GY9vfC5qu4p52RZmJmk4dNz7QXy0QIDhBOIDXhk_8hq6fkDk-OIhgXx-SgX1-GZwC8evs8-dgvHlotcw priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38659014 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3046512433 https://u-paris.hal.science/hal-04581640 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11040818 https://doaj.org/article/da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwELfW7YUXBIyPwKgMQvCADGni2AkSmlrUqkJsQhOVKl4sf66TSgJpxih_PWc3rQhMPPGSh8ROnPOd73c5534IPWO5c3mmYiKVYYQqlREpqSGpThKjpKZ5oG87OWXTGX0_z-Z7aEt31ApwdW1o5_mkZvXy1Y9v62Mw-LfB4HP2egU-K8sJeBviK5RRctVDB-CZuGc0OKG7rIJP9bPtjzPX9us4p1DDf7dS9xZ-o-TfKPTPzZS_eafJLXSzhZV4uNGD22jPlnfQ4bCEkPrLGj_HYaNn-IJ-iMYTCLEXuKqxq6uftsRGrjHDCnB0U-n1qsFNQLO2foMvVtgjRIthJVguscRhWDCXx3fRbDL-9G5KWjYFojMeN0RzRwfS0SJ3HFbbWCYmSWyhIGAaqIIrbbV0XDlrMpW4GIAbzJV10nIbDDe9h_bLqrQPEGa6UCwpcukMAJrYFsZ57iHqyf4kpSpCg60YhW5LjXvGi6UIIUfOxEb0AkQvgujFVYRe7vp83RTa-GfrkZ-dXUtfJDucqOpz0dqcMDAW45iWaqCoTlMZp8qywiiteGK1i9ALP7fCKxcMT8v2jwR4SV8USwx5AdFtwYs4QkedlmCCunP5KWhHZzDT4Qfhz_k8NESk8fdBhJ5slUf4_n5zW2mry5XwyWnAXTRNI3R_o0y7e3lKVp_pjlDeUbPOw7pXyotFKBMOwI76goUP_4esHqEbSTAUShJ6hPab-tI-BjjWqD7q8Tnvo4PR-PTjWT981OgHu4Pj2ejzL1PwOJ0 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fresh+or+frozen+day+6+blastocyst+transfer%3A+is+there+still+a+question%3F&rft.jtitle=Reproductive+biology+and+endocrinology&rft.au=Lucile+Ferreux&rft.au=Mathilde+Bourdon&rft.au=Ahmed+Chargui&rft.au=Julie+Firmin&rft.date=2024-04-24&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1477-7827&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12958-024-01214-w&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_da44df6cab1b4c33a03be69dbcb72ecf |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7827&client=summon |