Profile of regional fat and fat-free soft tissue accumulation in male athletes

• Published in: Journal of physiological anthropology Vol. 39; no. 1; p. 5
• Main Authors: Takai, Yohei, Nakatani, Miyuki, Aoki, Toru, Komori, Daisuke, Oyamada, Kazuyuki, Murata, Kensuke, Fujita, Eiji, Akamine, Takuya, Urita, Yoshihisa, Yamamoto, Masayoshi, Kanehisa, Hiroaki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 06.03.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescent; Adult; Analysis; Anthropology, Physical; Athletes; Athletes - statistics & numerical data; Body composition; Body Composition - physiology; Body Fat Distribution; Body Height - physiology; Body Weight - physiology; Breakpoint; Fat-free body mass; Humans; Legs; Male; Musculoskeletal system; Original; Piecewise regression analysis; Regional difference; Regression Analysis; Software; Sports injuries; Statistical analysis; Student athletes; Studies; Young Adult; Japan; United States > US; Breakpoint; Piecewise regression analysis; Regional difference; Body composition
• ISSN: 1880-6805; 1880-6791; 1880-6805
• DOI: 10.1186/s40101-020-0215-0

It is unclear whether or not the breakpoint (BP), at which the proportion of each of fat mass (FM) and fat-free soft tissue mass (FFSTM) to body mass (BM) alter, exists in male athletes. We examined the hypothesis that in male athletes, the regional FM and FFSTM-BM relationships have a BP, but the body mass at BP (BM ) differs among the arms, trunk, and legs. By using a dual X-ray absorptiometry, whole-body and regional FMs and FFSTMs in the arms, trunk, and legs were estimated in 198 male athletes (20.8 ± 2.1 years; 1.73 ± 0.07 m; 72.7 ± 14.8 kg). To detect the BP in the relationship between each of FM and FFSTM and BM, a piecewise linear regression analysis was used. If a BP was detected in the corresponding relationship, the significant difference between the regression slopes above and below the BP was examined. The regression analysis indicated that the BM existed in the FM- and FFSTM-BM relationships regardless of region and whole body. For the whole body, BM was 81.8 kg for FM and 82.2 kg for FFSTM. In regional FM-BM relationships, BM was 80.5 kg for arms, 82.6 kg for trunk, and 63.3 kg for legs, and the regression slopes above the BM became higher than those below the BP, and vice versa in regional FFSTM-BM relationships (BM 104.6 kg for arms, 80.9 kg for trunk, and 79.0 kg for legs). The relative differences in the slopes between below and above BM in the regional FM-BM relationships were higher in the arms and trunk than in the legs, and those in the regional FFSTM-BM relationships in the legs than in the trunk. Whole-body and regional FM- and FFSTM-BM relationships for male athletes have breakpoints at which the proportion of the tissue masses to BM alters. The BM and differences in the distribution of regional FM and FFSTM around the breakpoint are region specific.