The Law of Proportionate Effect: The Growth of the UK Credit Union Movement at National and Regional Level

:  This study examines credit union size‐growth relationships within the context of Gibrat's law of proportionate effect. This relates to the hypothesis that the growth of each firm in each period is random. The analysis covers the period 1994 to 2000 and is undertaken separately for the United...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of business finance & accounting Vol. 32; no. 9-10; pp. 1827 - 1859
Main Authors Ward, Ann-Marie, McKillop, Donal G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc 01.11.2005
Wiley Blackwell
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
SeriesJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary::  This study examines credit union size‐growth relationships within the context of Gibrat's law of proportionate effect. This relates to the hypothesis that the growth of each firm in each period is random. The analysis covers the period 1994 to 2000 and is undertaken separately for the United Kingdom (UK) and its regions, Northern Ireland, England & Wales and Scotland. Sample attrition is a characteristic of the data and to avoid the problem of survivorship bias the inverse of the Mill's ratio, obtained from a probit regression for surviving credit unions, is introduced into the estimating relationship. In terms of the empirical results, little evidence emerged to support the law of proportionate effect as a theoretical paradigm. Although not universal, three broad findings emerged. First, small credit unions on average grow faster than their larger counterparts, although there was also some evidence of non‐linearity in this relationship. Secondly, growth persistence pertained with credit unions which experienced above average growth (below average growth) in one period, experiencing above average growth (below average growth) in the next. Thirdly, variability of growth was not independent of size with the cross‐sectional variance of the error term inversely related to size suggesting that small credit unions have greater growth variability than larger ones.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-DQDZ1J9K-X
ArticleID:JBFA649
istex:F774EA87C639D3967D719A23FBA79F74A8775724
The authors are respectively, Lecturer in Accounting at Queen's University, Belfast; and Professor of Financial Services at Queen's University, Belfast. They are grateful for the very useful comments of the anonymous referees on an earlier draft of the paper.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-686X
1468-5957
DOI:10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00649.x