Dietary Casein and Soy Protein Isolate Modulate the Effects of Raffinose and Fructooligosaccharides on the Composition and Fermentation of Gut Microbiota in Rats
Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the compo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of food science Vol. 81; no. 8; pp. H2093 - H2098 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. Thirty female rats were fed casein and soy protein isolate with cellulose, raffinose (RAF), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Microbiota composition was examined by real‐time qPCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Dietary protein source affected cecum microbiota; acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were greater with soy protein than with casein. Prebiotic oligosaccharides had distinctive effects on gut microbiota; RAF increased the acetic acid concentration and Bifidobacterium spp. populations, and FOS increased the butyric acid concentration regardless of the dietary protein. Likewise, Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were detected in microbiota of the rats fed RAF, and Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen in microbiota of the rats fed FOS. Interactions between dietary proteins and prebiotic oligosaccharides were observed with Clostridium perfringens group populations and cecum IgA concentration. RAF and FOS decreased C. perfringens group populations in casein‐fed rats, and the combination of soy protein and RAF substantially increased cecum IgA concentration. These results indicate that dietary proteins can differentially modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on gut fermentation and microbiota, depending on the type of carbohydrate polymers involved.
Practical Application
Prebiotic raffinose and fructooligosaccharides increased acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations in the cecum, respectively. Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were observed with raffinose feeding, while Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen with fructooligosaccharides feeding. Dietary proteins can modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides. Cecum acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were increased by soy protein compared with casein feeding, and cecum IgA concentration increased when combining soy protein and raffinose. Although raffinose and fructooligosaccharides induced a decrease in Clostridium perfringens group populations, this trend was only seen with casein feeding. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. Thirty female rats were fed casein and soy protein isolate with cellulose, raffinose (RAF), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Microbiota composition was examined by real‐time qPCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Dietary protein source affected cecum microbiota; acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were greater with soy protein than with casein. Prebiotic oligosaccharides had distinctive effects on gut microbiota; RAF increased the acetic acid concentration and Bifidobacterium spp. populations, and FOS increased the butyric acid concentration regardless of the dietary protein. Likewise, Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were detected in microbiota of the rats fed RAF, and Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen in microbiota of the rats fed FOS. Interactions between dietary proteins and prebiotic oligosaccharides were observed with Clostridium perfringens group populations and cecum IgA concentration. RAF and FOS decreased C. perfringens group populations in casein‐fed rats, and the combination of soy protein and RAF substantially increased cecum IgA concentration. These results indicate that dietary proteins can differentially modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on gut fermentation and microbiota, depending on the type of carbohydrate polymers involved.
Practical Application
Prebiotic raffinose and fructooligosaccharides increased acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations in the cecum, respectively. Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were observed with raffinose feeding, while Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen with fructooligosaccharides feeding. Dietary proteins can modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides. Cecum acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were increased by soy protein compared with casein feeding, and cecum IgA concentration increased when combining soy protein and raffinose. Although raffinose and fructooligosaccharides induced a decrease in Clostridium perfringens group populations, this trend was only seen with casein feeding. Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. Thirty female rats were fed casein and soy protein isolate with cellulose, raffinose (RAF), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Microbiota composition was examined by real-time qPCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Dietary protein source affected cecum microbiota; acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were greater with soy protein than with casein. Prebiotic oligosaccharides had distinctive effects on gut microbiota; RAF increased the acetic acid concentration and Bifidobacterium spp. populations, and FOS increased the butyric acid concentration regardless of the dietary protein. Likewise, Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were detected in microbiota of the rats fed RAF, and Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen in microbiota of the rats fed FOS. Interactions between dietary proteins and prebiotic oligosaccharides were observed with Clostridium perfringens group populations and cecum IgA concentration. RAF and FOS decreased C. perfringens group populations in casein-fed rats, and the combination of soy protein and RAF substantially increased cecum IgA concentration. These results indicate that dietary proteins can differentially modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on gut fermentation and microbiota, depending on the type of carbohydrate polymers involved. Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. Thirty female rats were fed casein and soy protein isolate with cellulose, raffinose (RAF), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Microbiota composition was examined by real-time qPCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Dietary protein source affected cecum microbiota; acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were greater with soy protein than with casein. Prebiotic oligosaccharides had distinctive effects on gut microbiota; RAF increased the acetic acid concentration and Bifidobacterium spp. populations, and FOS increased the butyric acid concentration regardless of the dietary protein. Likewise, Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were detected in microbiota of the rats fed RAF, and Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen in microbiota of the rats fed FOS. Interactions between dietary proteins and prebiotic oligosaccharides were observed with Clostridium perfringens group populations and cecum IgA concentration. RAF and FOS decreased C. perfringens group populations in casein-fed rats, and the combination of soy protein and RAF substantially increased cecum IgA concentration. These results indicate that dietary proteins can differentially modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on gut fermentation and microbiota, depending on the type of carbohydrate polymers involved. Practical Application Prebiotic raffinose and fructooligosaccharides increased acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations in the cecum, respectively. Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were observed with raffinose feeding, while Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen with fructooligosaccharides feeding. Dietary proteins can modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides. Cecum acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were increased by soy protein compared with casein feeding, and cecum IgA concentration increased when combining soy protein and raffinose. Although raffinose and fructooligosaccharides induced a decrease in Clostridium perfringens group populations, this trend was only seen with casein feeding. Abstract Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent. In this study, we examined the influence of different dietary protein sources regarding the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on the composition and metabolic activity of gut microbiota. Thirty female rats were fed casein and soy protein isolate with cellulose, raffinose (RAF), and fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Microbiota composition was examined by real‐time qPCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Dietary protein source affected cecum microbiota; acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were greater with soy protein than with casein. Prebiotic oligosaccharides had distinctive effects on gut microbiota; RAF increased the acetic acid concentration and Bifidobacterium spp. populations, and FOS increased the butyric acid concentration regardless of the dietary protein. Likewise, Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were detected in microbiota of the rats fed RAF, and Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen in microbiota of the rats fed FOS. Interactions between dietary proteins and prebiotic oligosaccharides were observed with Clostridium perfringens group populations and cecum IgA concentration. RAF and FOS decreased C. perfringens group populations in casein‐fed rats, and the combination of soy protein and RAF substantially increased cecum IgA concentration. These results indicate that dietary proteins can differentially modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides on gut fermentation and microbiota, depending on the type of carbohydrate polymers involved. Practical Application Prebiotic raffinose and fructooligosaccharides increased acetic acid and butyric acid concentrations in the cecum, respectively. Bifidobacterium sp., Collinsella sp., and Lactobacillus sp. were observed with raffinose feeding, while Bacteroides sp., Roseburia sp., and Blautia sp. were seen with fructooligosaccharides feeding. Dietary proteins can modulate the effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides. Cecum acetic acid concentration and Lactobacillus spp. populations were increased by soy protein compared with casein feeding, and cecum IgA concentration increased when combining soy protein and raffinose. Although raffinose and fructooligosaccharides induced a decrease in Clostridium perfringens group populations, this trend was only seen with casein feeding. |
Author | Nishino, Naoki Ni, Kuikui Tsuruta, Takeshi Bai, Gaowa |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Gaowa surname: Bai fullname: Bai, Gaowa organization: Dept. of Animal Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, Okayama Univ, Okayama, Japan – sequence: 2 givenname: Kuikui surname: Ni fullname: Ni, Kuikui organization: Dept. of Animal Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, Okayama Univ, Okayama, Japan – sequence: 3 givenname: Takeshi surname: Tsuruta fullname: Tsuruta, Takeshi organization: Dept. of Animal Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, Okayama Univ, Okayama, Japan – sequence: 4 givenname: Naoki surname: Nishino fullname: Nishino, Naoki email: j1oufeed@okayama-u.ac.jp organization: Dept. of Animal Science, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, Okayama Univ, Okayama, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27434756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkktv1DAUhS1URB-wZocisWGT1o5fyRKmnaFVW0oLQmJjOc41dcnEg-0I5ufwT_HMtLNgAfXGvlffOVe2zz7aGfwACL0k-JDkdUQkxyWtGTkklDbkCdrbdnbQHsZVVRLC5C7aj_EOr2oqnqHdSjLKJBd76Pexg6TDspjoCG4o9NAVN35ZXAWfVvVp9L1OUFz4blwf0i0UJ9aCSbHwtrjW1rrBR1grp2E0yfveffNRG3Org-sgc8NaNvHzhY8uOb-ZM4UwhyHpdSN7zcZUXDgTfOt80kWefq1TfI6eWt1HeHG_H6DP05NPk_fl-YfZ6eTteWm4xKRsLXRU45Yx2tbC0oppK2RXG9u2HBouWC6NJkbkDkguiQXbcUIxNkRqTA_Qm43vIvgfI8Sk5i4a6Hs9gB-jIjXlvGEVax6BEi4aIil5DIprISpeZfT1X-idH8OQ76xIU-OmYUzIf1LZi1e1JDxTRxsqv2aMAaxaBDfP_6wIVqvkqFVO1Conap2crHh17zu2c-i2_ENUMiA2wE_Xw_J_fupsenzz4FxuhC4m-LUV6vBd5ftIrr5cztTk68fZu7PmSl3SP3Ma3rU |
CODEN | JFDSAZ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2019_1612286 crossref_primary_10_1002_jsfa_12940 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1674_6384_17_60109_6 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_13415 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15081959 crossref_primary_10_3945_cdn_117_001180 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac265 crossref_primary_10_3390_nutraceuticals2040025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_taap_2020_115130 crossref_primary_10_1111_jpn_13782 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_67709_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_017_0295_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_09637486_2017_1382454 crossref_primary_10_3920_JAAN2020_0011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_105313 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms12020356 crossref_primary_10_1002_mnfr_201700484 crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pex218 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13010201 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12035_024_04099_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_jn_nxab252 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2018_00072 crossref_primary_10_1093_glycob_cwad015 crossref_primary_10_1002_mnfr_202300586 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00394_024_03407_w crossref_primary_10_3382_ps_pey021 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_911500 crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2021_1875796 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11051194 crossref_primary_10_1039_D2FO00446A crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_020_04523_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2019_00142 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12061745 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_2c04410 crossref_primary_10_1111_1750_3841_15392 crossref_primary_10_1080_19490976_2020_1799533 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu15040956 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_35171_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13124466 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijbiomac_2019_09_159 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2018_1485628 crossref_primary_10_3390_cimb45090452 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fbio_2024_104627 crossref_primary_10_3934_microbiol_2021001 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05010.x 10.1016/j.cimid.2013.05.001 10.1007/s00253-013-5271-5 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.003 10.2144/04365ST04 10.1136/gut.34.3.386 10.1038/srep15220 10.1093/jn/126.5.1362 10.1111/1750-3841.13086 10.1128/AEM.01777-06 10.2527/2003.81102505x 10.3390/nu4081095 10.3177/jnsv.45.173 10.1093/jn/131.10.3098 10.1136/gut.35.1_Suppl.S35 10.3390/nu7105397 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156 10.4014/jmb.1310.10043 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02409.x 10.3168/jds.2014-7968 10.1007/s00394-013-0607-6 10.3109/08910609009140252 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 Institute of Food Technologists |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 Institute of Food Technologists |
DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QO 7QR 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K F28 FR3 P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/1750-3841.13391 |
DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Biotechnology Research Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Genetics Abstracts Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Biotechnology Research Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Genetics Abstracts Genetics Abstracts CrossRef Technology Research Database MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics |
EISSN | 1750-3841 |
EndPage | H2098 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4143597481 10_1111_1750_3841_13391 27434756 JFDS13391 ark_67375_WNG_CZQGBJ9P_N |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .DC .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 3-9 31~ 33P 3EH 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDPE ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ACAHQ ACBNA ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACKIV ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFDN AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AI. AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BKOMP BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F D-I DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DROCM DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NEJ NF~ O66 O9- OIG P-O P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR RNS ROL RX1 RXW SAMSI SJN SUPJJ TAE TN5 UB1 UBH UHB UKR V8K VH1 W8V W99 WBFHL WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XOL Y6R YQJ ZCA ZCG ZGI ZT4 ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT G8K CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QO 7QR 7ST 7T7 7U7 8FD C1K F28 FR3 P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5701-bfed3a0b443b86f324af67d8cfbb5e9564f67ca1c6cfbe7571fefd51300c17a03 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0022-1147 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 23:27:32 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 17 03:04:23 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 13:29:39 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 16:16:11 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 20:21:45 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:16:02 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 27 13:45:29 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:50:25 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:52:32 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
License | 2016 Institute of Food Technologists |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5701-bfed3a0b443b86f324af67d8cfbb5e9564f67ca1c6cfbe7571fefd51300c17a03 |
Notes | ArticleID:JFDS13391 ark:/67375/WNG-CZQGBJ9P-N istex:F28B84529E515284F7708A77363FD98CC89F8A4C ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27434756 |
PQID | 1810528715 |
PQPubID | 40513 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1835594249 proquest_miscellaneous_1815691731 proquest_miscellaneous_1810866252 proquest_journals_1980994467 proquest_journals_1810528715 crossref_primary_10_1111_1750_3841_13391 pubmed_primary_27434756 wiley_primary_10_1111_1750_3841_13391_JFDS13391 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_CZQGBJ9P_N |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August 2016 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2016 text: August 2016 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Chicago |
PublicationTitle | Journal of food science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Journal of Food Science |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH. 2012. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:577-89. Hayakawa K, Mizutani J, Wada K, Masai T, Yoshihara I, Mitsuoka T. 1990. Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on human faecal flora. Microb Ecol Health Dis 3:293-303. Henningsson AM, Bjorck IM, Nyman EM. 2002. Combinations of indigestible carbohydrates affect short-chain fatty acid formation in the hindgut of rats. J. Nutr 132:3098-104. Rinttila T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. 2004. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 97:1166-77. Ruengsomwong S, Korenori Y, Sakamoto N, Wannissorn B, Nakayama J, Nitisinprasert S. 2014. Senior Thai fecal microbiota comparison between vegetarians and non-vegetarians using PCR-DGGE and real-time PCR. J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1026-33. Vuyst LD, Leroy F. 2011. Cross-feeding between bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria explains bifidobacterial competitiveness, butyrate production, and gas production. Intl J Food Microbiol 149:73-80. An C, Kuda T, Yazaki T, Takahashi H, Kumura B. 2014. Caecal fermentation, putrefaction and microbiotas in rats fed milk casein, soy protein or fish meal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2779-87. Xiao J, Metzler-Zebeli BU, Zebeli Q. 2015. Gut function-enhancing properties and metabolic effects of dietary indigestible sugars in rodents and rabbits. Nutrients 7:8348-65. Gallaher DD, Stallings WH, Blessing LL, Busta FF, Brady LJ. 1996. Probiotics, cecal microflora, and aberrant crypts in the rat colon. J Nutr 126:1362-71. Kudoh K, Shimizu J, Ishiyama A, Wada M, Takita T, Kanke T, Innami S. 1999. Secretion and excretion of immunoglobulin A to cecum and feces differ with type of indigestible saccharides. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 45:173-81. Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E, Gibson DL. 2012. Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients 4:1095-119. Graf D, Cagno RD, Fak F, Flint HJ, Nyman M, Saarela M, Watzl B. 2015. Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota. Microb Ecol Health Dis 26:26164. Han H, Ogata Y, Yamamoto Y, Nagao S, Nishino N. 2014. Identification of lactic acid bacteria in the rumen and feces of dairy cows fed total mixed ration silage to assess the survival of silage bacteria in the gut. J Dairy Sci 97:5754-62. Makras L, Vuyst LD. 2006. The in vitro inhibition of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria by bifidobacteria is caused by the production of organic acids. Intl Dairy J 16:1049-57. Dinoto A, Marques TM, Sakamoto K, Fukiya S, Watanabe J, Ito S, Yokota A. 2006. Population dynamics of Bifidobacterium species in human feces during raffinose administration monitored by fluorescence in situ hybridization-flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7739-47. Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36:808-12. McIntyre A, Gibson PR, Young GP. 1993. Butyrate production from dietary fibre and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model. Gut 34:386-91. Zhu Y, Lin X, Zhao F, Shi X, Li H, Li Y, Zhu W, Xu X, Lu C, Zhou G. 2015. Meat, dairy and plant proteins alter bacterial composition of rat gut bacteria. Sci Rep 5:15220. Allaart JG, Ajam van Asten, Grone A. 2013. Predisposing factors and prevention of Clostridium perfringens-associated enteritis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 36:449-64. Hara H. 2002. Physiological effects of short-chain fatty acid produces from prebiotics in the colon. J Intestinal Microbiol 16:35-42. Matijasic BB, Obermajer T, Lipoglavsek L, Grabnar I, Avgustin G, Rogelj I. 2014. Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia. Eur J Nutr 53:1051-64. Smiricky-Tjardes MR, Flickinger EA, Grieshop CM, Bauer LL, Murphy MR, Fahey GC. 2003. In vitro fermentation characteristics of selected oligosaccharides by swine fecal microflora. J Anim Sci 81:2505-14. Li S, Gao L, Chen L, Ou S, Wang Y, Peng X. 2015. Continuously ingesting fructooligosaccharide can't maintain rat's gut Bifidobacterium at a high level. J Food Sci 80:M2530-4. Scheppach W. 1994. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut 35:S35-8. Li Y, Nishino N. 2011. Monitoring the bacterial community of maize silage stored in a bunker silo inoculated with Enterococcus faecium. Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri. J Appl Microbiol 110:1561-70. 2002; 16 2015; 5 2006; 72 2003; 81 2002; 132 2006; 16 1999; 45 2014; 24 2015; 80 1996; 126 2015; 7 2011; 110 1990; 3 2011; 149 2015; 26 1993; 34 2004; 97 2013; 36 2004; 36 1994; 35 2012; 4 2014; 98 2012; 9 2014; 97 2014; 53 e_1_2_5_25_1 e_1_2_5_26_1 e_1_2_5_23_1 e_1_2_5_24_1 e_1_2_5_21_1 e_1_2_5_22_1 Hara H. (e_1_2_5_10_1) 2002; 16 e_1_2_5_20_1 e_1_2_5_15_1 e_1_2_5_14_1 e_1_2_5_17_1 e_1_2_5_9_1 e_1_2_5_16_1 e_1_2_5_11_1 e_1_2_5_7_1 e_1_2_5_6_1 e_1_2_5_13_1 e_1_2_5_5_1 e_1_2_5_12_1 e_1_2_5_4_1 e_1_2_5_3_1 e_1_2_5_2_1 e_1_2_5_19_1 e_1_2_5_18_1 Graf D (e_1_2_5_8_1) 2015; 26 |
References_xml | – volume: 81 start-page: 2505 year: 2003 end-page: 14 article-title: In vitro fermentation characteristics of selected oligosaccharides by swine fecal microflora publication-title: J Anim Sci – volume: 72 start-page: 7739 year: 2006 end-page: 47 article-title: Population dynamics of species in human feces during raffinose administration monitored by fluorescence in situ hybridization‐flow cytometry publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol – volume: 3 start-page: 293 year: 1990 end-page: 303 article-title: Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on human faecal flora publication-title: Microb Ecol Health Dis – volume: 7 start-page: 8348 year: 2015 end-page: 65 article-title: Gut function‐enhancing properties and metabolic effects of dietary indigestible sugars in rodents and rabbits publication-title: Nutrients – volume: 80 start-page: M2530 year: 2015 end-page: 4 article-title: Continuously ingesting fructooligosaccharide can't maintain rat's gut at a high level publication-title: J Food Sci – volume: 16 start-page: 1049 year: 2006 end-page: 57 article-title: The in vitro inhibition of Gram‐negative pathogenic bacteria by bifidobacteria is caused by the production of organic acids publication-title: Intl Dairy J – volume: 97 start-page: 5754 year: 2014 end-page: 62 article-title: Identification of lactic acid bacteria in the rumen and feces of dairy cows fed total mixed ration silage to assess the survival of silage bacteria in the gut publication-title: J Dairy Sci – volume: 26 start-page: 26164 year: 2015 article-title: Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota publication-title: Microb Ecol Health Dis – volume: 110 start-page: 1561 year: 2011 end-page: 70 article-title: Monitoring the bacterial community of maize silage stored in a bunker silo inoculated with and publication-title: J Appl Microbiol – volume: 36 start-page: 808 year: 2004 end-page: 12 article-title: Improved extraction of PCR‐quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples publication-title: Biotechniques – volume: 45 start-page: 173 year: 1999 end-page: 81 article-title: Secretion and excretion of immunoglobulin A to cecum and feces differ with type of indigestible saccharides publication-title: J Nutr Sci Vitaminol – volume: 5 start-page: 15220 year: 2015 article-title: Meat, dairy and plant proteins alter bacterial composition of rat gut bacteria publication-title: Sci Rep – volume: 16 start-page: 35 year: 2002 end-page: 42 article-title: Physiological effects of short‐chain fatty acid produces from prebiotics in the colon publication-title: J Intestinal Microbiol – volume: 53 start-page: 1051 year: 2014 end-page: 64 article-title: Association of dietary type with fecal microbiota in vegetarians and omnivores in Slovenia publication-title: Eur J Nutr – volume: 9 start-page: 577 year: 2012 end-page: 89 article-title: The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health publication-title: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 34 start-page: 386 year: 1993 end-page: 91 article-title: Butyrate production from dietary fibre and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model publication-title: Gut – volume: 35 start-page: S35 year: 1994 end-page: 8 article-title: Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function publication-title: Gut – volume: 132 start-page: 3098 year: 2002 end-page: 104 article-title: Combinations of indigestible carbohydrates affect short‐chain fatty acid formation in the hindgut of rats publication-title: J. Nutr – volume: 24 start-page: 1026 year: 2014 end-page: 33 article-title: Senior Thai fecal microbiota comparison between vegetarians and non‐vegetarians using PCR‐DGGE and real‐time PCR publication-title: J Microbiol Biotechnol – volume: 126 start-page: 1362 year: 1996 end-page: 71 article-title: Probiotics, cecal microflora, and aberrant crypts in the rat colon publication-title: J Nutr – volume: 97 start-page: 1166 year: 2004 end-page: 77 article-title: Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA‐targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real‐time PCR publication-title: J Appl Microbiol – volume: 4 start-page: 1095 year: 2012 end-page: 119 article-title: Diet‐induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease publication-title: Nutrients – volume: 36 start-page: 449 year: 2013 end-page: 64 article-title: Predisposing factors and prevention of ‐associated enteritis publication-title: Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis – volume: 149 start-page: 73 year: 2011 end-page: 80 article-title: Cross‐feeding between bifidobacteria and butyrate‐producing colon bacteria explains bifidobacterial competitiveness, butyrate production, and gas production publication-title: Intl J Food Microbiol – volume: 98 start-page: 2779 year: 2014 end-page: 87 article-title: Caecal fermentation, putrefaction and microbiotas in rats fed milk casein, soy protein or fish meal publication-title: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol – ident: e_1_2_5_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05010.x – ident: e_1_2_5_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2013.05.001 – ident: e_1_2_5_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5271-5 – ident: e_1_2_5_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.003 – ident: e_1_2_5_25_1 doi: 10.2144/04365ST04 – volume: 26 start-page: 26164 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_5_8_1 article-title: Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota publication-title: Microb Ecol Health Dis contributor: fullname: Graf D – ident: e_1_2_5_18_1 doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.386 – ident: e_1_2_5_26_1 doi: 10.1038/srep15220 – ident: e_1_2_5_7_1 doi: 10.1093/jn/126.5.1362 – volume: 16 start-page: 35 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_5_10_1 article-title: Physiological effects of short‐chain fatty acid produces from prebiotics in the colon publication-title: J Intestinal Microbiol contributor: fullname: Hara H. – ident: e_1_2_5_15_1 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13086 – ident: e_1_2_5_5_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01777-06 – ident: e_1_2_5_22_1 doi: 10.2527/2003.81102505x – ident: e_1_2_5_4_1 doi: 10.3390/nu4081095 – ident: e_1_2_5_13_1 doi: 10.3177/jnsv.45.173 – ident: e_1_2_5_12_1 doi: 10.1093/jn/131.10.3098 – ident: e_1_2_5_21_1 doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_Suppl.S35 – ident: e_1_2_5_24_1 doi: 10.3390/nu7105397 – ident: e_1_2_5_6_1 doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156 – ident: e_1_2_5_20_1 doi: 10.4014/jmb.1310.10043 – ident: e_1_2_5_19_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02409.x – ident: e_1_2_5_9_1 doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-7968 – ident: e_1_2_5_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s00394-013-0607-6 – ident: e_1_2_5_11_1 doi: 10.3109/08910609009140252 – ident: e_1_2_5_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.006 |
SSID | ssj0002236 |
Score | 2.4175665 |
Snippet | Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor extent.... Abstract Although diet has an important influence on the composition of gut microbiota, the impact of dietary protein sources has only been studied to a minor... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | H2093 |
SubjectTerms | Acetic acid Acids Animals Bacteria - drug effects Bacteria - growth & development Bacteria - metabolism Bacteroides Bifidobacterium Bifidobacterium - drug effects Bifidobacterium - growth & development Bifidobacterium - metabolism Butyric acid Butyric Acid - metabolism Carbohydrates Casein Caseins - metabolism Caseins - pharmacology Cecum Cecum - metabolism Cellulose Clostridium perfringens Concentration (composition) Concentration gradient Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Diet Dietary Proteins - metabolism Dietary Proteins - pharmacology Feces - microbiology Feeding Female Fermentation Fermentation - drug effects Food science Fructooligosaccharides Gastrointestinal Microbiome - drug effects Gel electrophoresis Immunoglobulin A Intestinal microflora Lactobacillus Lactobacillus - drug effects Lactobacillus - growth & development Lactobacillus - metabolism Microbiota Oligosaccharides Oligosaccharides - metabolism Oligosaccharides - pharmacology Polymers Populations Prebiotics Protein sources Proteins Raffinose Raffinose - metabolism Raffinose - pharmacology Rats Rodents Soy products Soybean Proteins - metabolism Soybean Proteins - pharmacology |
Title | Dietary Casein and Soy Protein Isolate Modulate the Effects of Raffinose and Fructooligosaccharides on the Composition and Fermentation of Gut Microbiota in Rats |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-CZQGBJ9P-N/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13391 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27434756 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1810528715 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1980994467 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1810866252 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1815691731 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1835594249 |
Volume | 81 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF6hcoALb6ihoEVCiIuDHe_LR0hISqRGJaUCcbH2iawiG9W2BPwb_imzazvQqipCXCI7nl3bk5mdb-KZzwg9S4hRJtckFlK4mBgjYgFRO1aOZ1RkWmcysH2u2f4xWX2kYzWh74Xp-SG2f7h5zwjrtXdwqZo_nBzinmeGJekE0qzQv55m3Bd1zTe_CaQg-LGRLxyQPx_IfXwtz7nxZ-LSVa_ibxeBzrMYNgShxU2kxsvva09OJl2rJvrHOWbH_7q_W-jGAFHxq96mbqMrtrqDro0dzM1d9HNe2hYmxjMIgWWFZWXwUf0dH3rOB9h_C_YMEBYf1KYLGwAycU-T3ODa4Y10rqzqxoaRC09gW9dfys91I7XvAiuNBbkqDPPr1VBX1ktDJBnapSo_17Jr8UHZs0m1EsPZN7Jt7qHjxZv3s_14eNVDrClPUjANazKZKEIyJZgDlCcd40ZopxS1kMMR2NUy1Qy-sZzy1FlnqH8Wp1Muk-w-2qnqyu4izHIzzbTjiTaCCEckNxySopQJoxL4iNCL8YcuvvaMHsWYCXmdF17nRdB5hJ4HQ9jKydMTXwjHafFhvSxmn94tX6_yw2Idob3RUophDWgKwE4J9QkpvfhwLgCdQzbOI_R0exic2z-xkZWtu34KwSBFnV4qQxkk3Vl6mQzAypxAqh2hB70hb-9pChiScMoi9DKY49-UUqwW86Ow9fCfRzxC1wFwsr6Acg_ttKedfQygrlVPgt_-AuBoQQ4 |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,1378,27936,27937,46306,46730 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELfQ9jBe-P7IGGAkhHhJSRrHdh-hpe3KWo1uE9NeLMcfKBpKpiWVgP-G_5Szk5RtmoYQL1XSnF35euf7XXL3C0KvI6IzPVAk5JLbkGjNQw5RO8wsS1KeKJVIz_a5oNMjMjtOjy_0wjT8EOsbbs4z_H7tHNzdkL7g5RD4HDUsiXuQZ7kG9k1w-sS9vmG0_EMhBeGPdozhgP1ZS-_jqnmuTHApMm06JX-_DnZeRrE-DI3vItUtoKk-Oe2t6qynfl7hdvy_Fd5Dd1qUit83ZnUf3TLFA7TVNTFXD9GvUW5qmBkPIQrmBZaFxgflD7zvaB_gfBdMGlAsnpd65Q8AZ-KGKbnCpcVLaW1elJXxI8eOw7Ysv-Vfy0oq1wiWawNyhR_mtqy2tKyRhmDSdkwVbq7JqsbzvCGUqiWGX1_KunqEjsYfD4fTsH3bQ6hSFsVgHUYnMsoISTJOLQA9aSnTXNksSw2kcQROlYwVhW8MS1lsjdWpexynYiaj5DHaKMrCPEWYDnQ_UZZFSnPCLZFMM8iLYsp1FsFHgN52_7Q4a0g9RJcMOZ0Lp3PhdR6gN94S1nLy_NTVwrFUfFlMxPDk8-TDbLAvFgHa6UxFtNtAJQA-RanLSdPrLw84AHRIyFmAXq0vg3-7hzayMOWqmYJTyFL7N8qkFPLuJL5JBpDlgEC2HaAnjSWv19QHGElYSgP0ztvj35QiZuPRgT_a_ucRL9HW9HC-J_Z2F5-eoduAP2lTT7mDNurzlXkOGK_OXngn_g3QrUUm |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF6hVgIuvB-GAouEEBcHO95XjpCQtIFGIaUCcVmt94GsIruqHQn4N_xTZtd2oFVVhLhEdjy7sSczO9_YM58RepYQk5uRJrFQwsXEGBELiNpx7nhGRaZ1pgLb54LtHpL5J9pXE_pemJYfYnPDzXtGWK-9gx8b94eTQ9zzzLAkHUCa5fvXtwkD_Otx0eo3gxREP9YThgP05x27jy_mOTPBqcC07XX87TzUeRrEhig0vY7y_vzb4pOjwbrJB_rHGWrH_7rAG-hah1Hxq9aobqJLtryFrvQtzPVt9HNS2AYmxmOIgUWJVWnwQfUdLz3pA-zvgUEDhsX7lVmHDUCZuOVJrnHl8Eo5V5RVbcPIqWewraqvxZeqVtq3gRXGglwZhvkFqyssa6UhlHT9UqWfa7Zu8H7R0kk1CsOvr1RT30GH0zcfxrtx966HWFOepGAb1mQqyQnJcsEcwDzlGDdCuzynFpI4ArtapZrBN5ZTnjrrDPUP43TKVZLdRVtlVdr7CLORGWba8UQbQYQjihsOWVHKhMkT-IjQi_6PlsctpYfsUyGvc-l1LoPOI_Q8GMJGTp0c-Uo4TuXHxUyOP7-fvZ6PlnIRoZ3eUmS3CNQSwFNCfUZKzz88EgDPIR3nEXq6OQze7R_ZqNJW63YKwSBHHV4oQxlk3Vl6kQzgyhGBXDtC91pD3lzTEEAk4ZRF6GUwx78pRc6nk4Ow9eCfRzxBl5eTqXy3t3j7EF0F8Mn8_fmU7qCt5mRtHwHAa_LHwYV_Ab1mQ9o |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary+Casein+and+Soy+Protein+Isolate+Modulate+the+Effects+of+Raffinose+and+Fructooligosaccharides+on+the+Composition+and+Fermentation+of+Gut+Microbiota+in+Rats&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+food+science&rft.au=Bai%2C+Gaowa&rft.au=Ni%2C+Kuikui&rft.au=Tsuruta%2C+Takeshi&rft.au=Nishino%2C+Naoki&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=H2093&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13391&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=4143597481 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-1147&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-1147&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-1147&client=summon |