替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌的多中心临床研究
目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义...
Saved in:
Published in | 中华肿瘤杂志 Vol. 39; no. 8; pp. 607 - 612 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011
2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0253-3766 |
DOI | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009 |
Cover
Abstract | 目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关。多因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨。 |
---|---|
AbstractList | 目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关。多因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨。 目的 分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素.方法 收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组.其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素. 结果 154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例.替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020).单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关.多因素分析显示, ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002).两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05). 结论 替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨. |
Abstract_FL | Objective To investigate the safety, efficacy and prognostic factors of S-1 versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC).Methods From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, 154 ABC patients with pathological diagnosis were separated into two groups: S-1 with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (group S-1) and capecitabine with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (Group capecitabine).The efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.Results There were 70 patients in group S-1 and 84 patients in group capecitabine.The objective response rates (ORR) were 31.4% (22/70) in group S-1 and 28.6% (24/84) in group capecitabine.The disease control rates (DCR) were 74.3% (52/70) and 83.3% (70/84), respectively.There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between two groups (P>0.05).The DCR of patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy was significantly higher than that of S-1 monotherapy [94.4%(17/18) and 64.0%(16/25), P=0.028].The median PFS was 7.5 and 8.9 months for the patients in the group S-1 and group capecitabine, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.423).The 1-year survival rates of group S-1 and group capecitabine were 81.4% and 66.7%, respectively, with no significant differences(P=0.020).Univariate analysis showed that ER and/or PR status (P=0.004), T stage (P=0.041), and molecular typing (P=0.046) were associated with PFS.Multivariate analysis showed ER and/or PR status (P=0.034) was an independent prognostic factor related with PFS.The incidence of hemoglobin reduction was 14.3% (10/70) and 36.9% (31/84) in the group S-1 and group capecitabine, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.002).There was no significant difference in the incidence of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and hand-foot syndrome between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions S-1 and capecitabine are both effective for advanced breast cancer.Neither ORR nor DCR were significantly different between these two groups.The incidence of gastrointestinal reactions and thrombocytopenia of S-1 was slightly lower than that of capecitabine. |
Author | 李颖 姜达 吴圆圆 李立立 崔彦芝 董倩 |
AuthorAffiliation | 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科,石家庄050011 |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011 |
Author_FL | Li Lili Dong Qian Wu Yuanyuan Cui Yanzhi Jiang Da Li Ying |
Author_FL_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Li Ying – sequence: 2 fullname: Jiang Da – sequence: 3 fullname: Wu Yuanyuan – sequence: 4 fullname: Li Lili – sequence: 5 fullname: Cui Yanzhi – sequence: 6 fullname: Dong Qian |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 李颖 姜达 吴圆圆 李立立 崔彦芝 董倩 |
BookMark | eNo9j8tKw0AARWdRwVr7E4LgJnEeTWZmKUWtUHDTfckkkzalTbVBxG7VhVJBRCu2QhUs6MKFD6SPRX8mk_QzjCiuLhwO93KXQMpv-hKANQR1Qk24bjcsvaZ7QeDrEBtES6CpY4ioDpkOIU-B9D9fBNkg8AQ0EDEZQWYaFKL-TF2eqeFQXXXUxaMajMNpN5o-R-_TuHs7n_XV2010PwjHH_PTSXzXiXsn6qkXjl7V7DgcfarJefxwHb98LYMF16oHMvuXGVDa2izlC1pxd3snv1HUbINCDWEmHcqpFEwy5DqECyIsBwmMKGOS29yk0uAOhY6AwrVyNOdihJHIccmYK0gGrP7WHlq-a_mVcq150PKTwXK72q7_3IYMIph4K7-eXW36lX0vMfdaXsNqHZVNihnlmGLyDXAveQc |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA 2B. 4A8 92I 93N PSX TCJ |
DOI | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009 |
DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong WANFANG Data Centre Wanfang Data Journals 万方数据期刊 - 香港版 China Online Journals (COJ) China Online Journals (COJ) |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
DocumentTitleAlternate | A multicenter clinical study for the comparison of S-1 versus capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer |
DocumentTitle_FL | A multicenter clinical study for the comparison of S-1 versus capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer |
EndPage | 612 |
ExternalDocumentID | zhzl201708010 672879272 |
GroupedDBID | --- -05 123 2B. 2C~ 2RA 92F 92I 92L ABDBF ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CCEZO CIEJG CQIGP CW9 EOJEC OBODZ TCJ TGQ U1G U5O W91 ~WA 4A8 93N ABJNI ACUHS PSX |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c570-128ed797eb8e81fd39b3bad1b21788e9c967e59d70db0bfa474f2121b49e88fb3 |
ISSN | 0253-3766 |
IngestDate | Thu May 29 04:00:01 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 09:59:36 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Keywords | 卡培他滨 乳腺肿瘤 Prognosis Capecitabine 替吉奥 S-1 预后 Efficacy Breast neoplasms Metastasis 转移 疗效 |
Language | Chinese |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c570-128ed797eb8e81fd39b3bad1b21788e9c967e59d70db0bfa474f2121b49e88fb3 |
Notes | ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, efficacy and prognostic factors of S-1 versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC).MethodsFrom January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, 154 ABC patients with pathological diagnosis were separated into two groups: S-1 with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (group S-1) and capecitabine with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (Group capecitabine). The efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 70 patients in group S-1 and 84 patients in group capecitabine. The objective response rates (ORR) were 31.4% (22/70) in group S-1 and 28.6% (24/84) in group capecitabine. The disease control rates (DCR) were 74.3% (52/70) and 83.3% (70/84), respectively. There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between two groups (P〉0.05). The DCR of patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy was significantly higher than that of S-1 monotherapy [94.4%(17/18) and 64.0%(16/25), P=0.028] |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | wanfang_journals_zhzl201708010 chongqing_primary_672879272 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2017 text: 2017 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | 中华肿瘤杂志 |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Chinese Journal of Oncology |
PublicationTitle_FL | Chinese Journal of Oncology |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011 |
SSID | ssib051368316 ssib007279245 ssib000995398 ssj0042033 ssib017477325 ssib006576341 ssib001103529 ssib058574917 |
Score | 2.121433 |
Snippet | ... 目的 分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素.方法... |
SourceID | wanfang chongqing |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 607 |
SubjectTerms | 乳腺肿瘤 卡培他滨 替吉奥 疗效 转移 预后 |
Title | 替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌的多中心临床研究 |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/93685X/201708/672879272.html https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zhzl201708010 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1Na9RAdKgtiBdRVKzV0oMDwrI1yUzm45h0dymCnir0tmQ22RbRrR_tZa_qQakgohVboQoW9ODBD6Qfh_6ZzW5_hu9N0mwU8QtCeLzM-5pJZt5L3rwQcpH5cdTyXFZNPN2qcpaIahQ5SVX4xqiItxnXuDn56jUxe51fmffnR45USllLK8tmutX95b6S_xlVwMG44i7ZfxjZgikgAIbxhTOMMJz_aoxpXVAd0rBB6z7VDlUagcAeiPGomkFA1WjgWkyDhtCG0zCkWiA5AIGygIdwXSJeS1pXyBaYA1XoUu1bWTPIAck1DRm2UXA1sFTaygIgoIpbNTjC2FjRoGb5NKhiOSa0bYBWWfLAoZpbADiLssf8AwcwRNWtXM9aDeIUCkLdaojMpOhicT28AkSaBh4YV7G6SbQFbazDUcm7L9MJLihRAJUSB9AupCosAEsHRDqzBTpZWN0CIKggpF0aMKu3A4aVX7BkO0nzGdjzGc7AorxcZLWX8sdCleZ-kf2-N3cjRJYd_vMKhTlIcFu1bkXTN6yQ6UII5hlKW0_W0cPVuciZFBKCW-1J8DfGPCldf5SMBWEtbJS8Ze2XqzmCZwfu9dBbFRBbspL3K7F45PCjMsSmUrLh9O67TCiG0UPm2HDPYTZh41Dho-RSbtHlP9mDlUsWlzoLd8Afs9vjOu2os1Dy5OZOkON5CDYVZM_TSTLSXTxFZvsb--nTR-nWVvpsNX3yNt3c6e2t9ffe9z_vDdZeHuxvpJ9e9F9v9na-HDzcHbxaHaw_SN-t97Y_pvv3e9tf093HgzfPBx--nSZzjfrczGw1_8tIteVLzExSSSy1TIxKlNuOmTbMRLFrIFZXKtEtLWTi61g6sXFMO-KSt8Hdcw3XiVJtw86Q0c5SJzlLpmI3Ntx4JlEJlmhS2jEx-N8-5j5zI9Q4mSg6oXk7KybTLIZ1nEzm3dLMp5h7ze5i9yb2IoR1rnPut-QT5Bi2zN4Oniejy3dXkgvgLy-byfw--Q6t7ZWf |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E6%9B%BF%E5%90%89%E5%A5%A5%E5%92%8C%E5%8D%A1%E5%9F%B9%E4%BB%96%E6%BB%A8%E6%B2%BB%E7%96%97%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E6%9C%9F%E4%B9%B3%E8%85%BA%E7%99%8C%E7%9A%84%E5%A4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%E4%B8%B4%E5%BA%8A%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E8%82%BF%E7%98%A4%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97&rft.au=%E6%9D%8E%E9%A2%96+%E5%A7%9C%E8%BE%BE+%E5%90%B4%E5%9C%86%E5%9C%86+%E6%9D%8E%E7%AB%8B%E7%AB%8B+%E5%B4%94%E5%BD%A6%E8%8A%9D+%E8%91%A3%E5%80%A9&rft.date=2017&rft.issn=0253-3766&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=612&rft_id=info:doi/10.3760%2Fcma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009&rft.externalDocID=672879272 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F93685X%2F93685X.jpg http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Fzhzl%2Fzhzl.jpg |