替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌的多中心临床研究

目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中华肿瘤杂志 Vol. 39; no. 8; pp. 607 - 612
Main Author 李颖 姜达 吴圆圆 李立立 崔彦芝 董倩
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011 2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0253-3766
DOI10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009

Cover

Abstract 目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关。多因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨。
AbstractList 目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关。多因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨。
目的 分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素.方法 收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组.其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素. 结果 154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例.替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020).单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关.多因素分析显示, ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034).替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002).两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05). 结论 替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨.
Abstract_FL Objective To investigate the safety, efficacy and prognostic factors of S-1 versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC).Methods From January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, 154 ABC patients with pathological diagnosis were separated into two groups: S-1 with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (group S-1) and capecitabine with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (Group capecitabine).The efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.Results There were 70 patients in group S-1 and 84 patients in group capecitabine.The objective response rates (ORR) were 31.4% (22/70) in group S-1 and 28.6% (24/84) in group capecitabine.The disease control rates (DCR) were 74.3% (52/70) and 83.3% (70/84), respectively.There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between two groups (P>0.05).The DCR of patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy was significantly higher than that of S-1 monotherapy [94.4%(17/18) and 64.0%(16/25), P=0.028].The median PFS was 7.5 and 8.9 months for the patients in the group S-1 and group capecitabine, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.423).The 1-year survival rates of group S-1 and group capecitabine were 81.4% and 66.7%, respectively, with no significant differences(P=0.020).Univariate analysis showed that ER and/or PR status (P=0.004), T stage (P=0.041), and molecular typing (P=0.046) were associated with PFS.Multivariate analysis showed ER and/or PR status (P=0.034) was an independent prognostic factor related with PFS.The incidence of hemoglobin reduction was 14.3% (10/70) and 36.9% (31/84) in the group S-1 and group capecitabine, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.002).There was no significant difference in the incidence of leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and hand-foot syndrome between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions S-1 and capecitabine are both effective for advanced breast cancer.Neither ORR nor DCR were significantly different between these two groups.The incidence of gastrointestinal reactions and thrombocytopenia of S-1 was slightly lower than that of capecitabine.
Author 李颖 姜达 吴圆圆 李立立 崔彦芝 董倩
AuthorAffiliation 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科,石家庄050011
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011
Author_FL Li Lili
Dong Qian
Wu Yuanyuan
Cui Yanzhi
Jiang Da
Li Ying
Author_FL_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Li Ying
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Jiang Da
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Wu Yuanyuan
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Li Lili
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Cui Yanzhi
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Dong Qian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 李颖 姜达 吴圆圆 李立立 崔彦芝 董倩
BookMark eNo9j8tKw0AARWdRwVr7E4LgJnEeTWZmKUWtUHDTfckkkzalTbVBxG7VhVJBRCu2QhUs6MKFD6SPRX8mk_QzjCiuLhwO93KXQMpv-hKANQR1Qk24bjcsvaZ7QeDrEBtES6CpY4ioDpkOIU-B9D9fBNkg8AQ0EDEZQWYaFKL-TF2eqeFQXXXUxaMajMNpN5o-R-_TuHs7n_XV2010PwjHH_PTSXzXiXsn6qkXjl7V7DgcfarJefxwHb98LYMF16oHMvuXGVDa2izlC1pxd3snv1HUbINCDWEmHcqpFEwy5DqECyIsBwmMKGOS29yk0uAOhY6AwrVyNOdihJHIccmYK0gGrP7WHlq-a_mVcq150PKTwXK72q7_3IYMIph4K7-eXW36lX0vMfdaXsNqHZVNihnlmGLyDXAveQc
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
W91
~WA
2B.
4A8
92I
93N
PSX
TCJ
DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009
DatabaseName 维普期刊资源整合服务平台
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台
中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong
WANFANG Data Centre
Wanfang Data Journals
万方数据期刊 - 香港版
China Online Journals (COJ)
China Online Journals (COJ)
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate A multicenter clinical study for the comparison of S-1 versus capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer
DocumentTitle_FL A multicenter clinical study for the comparison of S-1 versus capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer
EndPage 612
ExternalDocumentID zhzl201708010
672879272
GroupedDBID ---
-05
123
2B.
2C~
2RA
92F
92I
92L
ABDBF
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CCEZO
CIEJG
CQIGP
CW9
EOJEC
OBODZ
TCJ
TGQ
U1G
U5O
W91
~WA
4A8
93N
ABJNI
ACUHS
PSX
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c570-128ed797eb8e81fd39b3bad1b21788e9c967e59d70db0bfa474f2121b49e88fb3
ISSN 0253-3766
IngestDate Thu May 29 04:00:01 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 14 09:59:36 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords 卡培他滨
乳腺肿瘤
Prognosis
Capecitabine
替吉奥
S-1
预后
Efficacy
Breast neoplasms
Metastasis
转移
疗效
Language Chinese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c570-128ed797eb8e81fd39b3bad1b21788e9c967e59d70db0bfa474f2121b49e88fb3
Notes ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, efficacy and prognostic factors of S-1 versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC).MethodsFrom January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, 154 ABC patients with pathological diagnosis were separated into two groups: S-1 with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (group S-1) and capecitabine with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (Group capecitabine). The efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 70 patients in group S-1 and 84 patients in group capecitabine. The objective response rates (ORR) were 31.4% (22/70) in group S-1 and 28.6% (24/84) in group capecitabine. The disease control rates (DCR) were 74.3% (52/70) and 83.3% (70/84), respectively. There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between two groups (P〉0.05). The DCR of patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy was significantly higher than that of S-1 monotherapy [94.4%(17/18) and 64.0%(16/25), P=0.028]
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs wanfang_journals_zhzl201708010
chongqing_primary_672879272
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2017
  text: 2017
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 中华肿瘤杂志
PublicationTitleAlternate Chinese Journal of Oncology
PublicationTitle_FL Chinese Journal of Oncology
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011
Publisher_xml – name: 河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011
SSID ssib051368316
ssib007279245
ssib000995398
ssj0042033
ssib017477325
ssib006576341
ssib001103529
ssib058574917
Score 2.121433
Snippet ...
目的 分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素.方法...
SourceID wanfang
chongqing
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 607
SubjectTerms 乳腺肿瘤
卡培他滨
替吉奥
疗效
转移
预后
Title 替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌的多中心临床研究
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/93685X/201708/672879272.html
https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zhzl201708010
Volume 39
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1Na9RAdKgtiBdRVKzV0oMDwrI1yUzm45h0dymCnir0tmQ22RbRrR_tZa_qQakgohVboQoW9ODBD6Qfh_6ZzW5_hu9N0mwU8QtCeLzM-5pJZt5L3rwQcpH5cdTyXFZNPN2qcpaIahQ5SVX4xqiItxnXuDn56jUxe51fmffnR45USllLK8tmutX95b6S_xlVwMG44i7ZfxjZgikgAIbxhTOMMJz_aoxpXVAd0rBB6z7VDlUagcAeiPGomkFA1WjgWkyDhtCG0zCkWiA5AIGygIdwXSJeS1pXyBaYA1XoUu1bWTPIAck1DRm2UXA1sFTaygIgoIpbNTjC2FjRoGb5NKhiOSa0bYBWWfLAoZpbADiLssf8AwcwRNWtXM9aDeIUCkLdaojMpOhicT28AkSaBh4YV7G6SbQFbazDUcm7L9MJLihRAJUSB9AupCosAEsHRDqzBTpZWN0CIKggpF0aMKu3A4aVX7BkO0nzGdjzGc7AorxcZLWX8sdCleZ-kf2-N3cjRJYd_vMKhTlIcFu1bkXTN6yQ6UII5hlKW0_W0cPVuciZFBKCW-1J8DfGPCldf5SMBWEtbJS8Ze2XqzmCZwfu9dBbFRBbspL3K7F45PCjMsSmUrLh9O67TCiG0UPm2HDPYTZh41Dho-RSbtHlP9mDlUsWlzoLd8Afs9vjOu2os1Dy5OZOkON5CDYVZM_TSTLSXTxFZvsb--nTR-nWVvpsNX3yNt3c6e2t9ffe9z_vDdZeHuxvpJ9e9F9v9na-HDzcHbxaHaw_SN-t97Y_pvv3e9tf093HgzfPBx--nSZzjfrczGw1_8tIteVLzExSSSy1TIxKlNuOmTbMRLFrIFZXKtEtLWTi61g6sXFMO-KSt8Hdcw3XiVJtw86Q0c5SJzlLpmI3Ntx4JlEJlmhS2jEx-N8-5j5zI9Q4mSg6oXk7KybTLIZ1nEzm3dLMp5h7ze5i9yb2IoR1rnPut-QT5Bi2zN4Oniejy3dXkgvgLy-byfw--Q6t7ZWf
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E6%9B%BF%E5%90%89%E5%A5%A5%E5%92%8C%E5%8D%A1%E5%9F%B9%E4%BB%96%E6%BB%A8%E6%B2%BB%E7%96%97%E8%BF%9B%E5%B1%95%E6%9C%9F%E4%B9%B3%E8%85%BA%E7%99%8C%E7%9A%84%E5%A4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%E4%B8%B4%E5%BA%8A%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E8%82%BF%E7%98%A4%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97&rft.au=%E6%9D%8E%E9%A2%96+%E5%A7%9C%E8%BE%BE+%E5%90%B4%E5%9C%86%E5%9C%86+%E6%9D%8E%E7%AB%8B%E7%AB%8B+%E5%B4%94%E5%BD%A6%E8%8A%9D+%E8%91%A3%E5%80%A9&rft.date=2017&rft.issn=0253-3766&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=612&rft_id=info:doi/10.3760%2Fcma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009&rft.externalDocID=672879272
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F93685X%2F93685X.jpg
http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Fzhzl%2Fzhzl.jpg