替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌的多中心临床研究
目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义...
Saved in:
Published in | 中华肿瘤杂志 Vol. 39; no. 8; pp. 607 - 612 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
河北医科大学第四医院肿瘤内科, 石家庄,050011
2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0253-3766 |
DOI | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009 |
Cover
Summary: | 目的分析替吉奥和卡培他滨治疗进展期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效、安全性及预后相关因素。方法收集2012年1月1日至2014年12月31日间病理确诊的154例ABC患者,将患者分为替吉奥组和卡培他滨组。其中替吉奥组给予单药替吉奥或者联合三代化疗药,卡培他滨组给予单药卡培他滨或者联合三代化疗药,观察患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生情况及其预后相关因素。结果154例ABC患者中,替吉奥组70例,卡培他滨组84例。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为31.4%(22/70)和28.6%(24/84),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为74.3%(52/70)和83.3%(70/84),差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。单药卡培他滨和单药替吉奥治疗患者的DCR分别为94.4%(17/18)和64.0%(16/25),差异有统计学意义(P=0.028)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的中位无进展生存时间(PFS)分别为7.5和8.9个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.423)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的1年生存率分别为81.4%和66.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。单因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态(P=0.004)、T分期(P=0.041)、分子分型(P=0.046)与ABC患者PFS有关。多因素分析显示,ER和(或)PR状态为影响ABC患者PFS的独立因素(P=0.034)。替吉奥组和卡培他滨组患者的血红蛋白降低发生率分别为14.3% (10/70)和36.9% (31/84),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。两组患者白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、手足综合征的发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。结论替吉奥和卡培他滨均为治疗ABC的有效药物,其ORR和DCR差异均无统计学意义,但替吉奥的消化道反应和血小板减少的发生率略低于卡培他滨。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, efficacy and prognostic factors of S-1 versus capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC).MethodsFrom January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014, 154 ABC patients with pathological diagnosis were separated into two groups: S-1 with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (group S-1) and capecitabine with or without the 3rd generation chemotherapy drug (Group capecitabine). The efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 70 patients in group S-1 and 84 patients in group capecitabine. The objective response rates (ORR) were 31.4% (22/70) in group S-1 and 28.6% (24/84) in group capecitabine. The disease control rates (DCR) were 74.3% (52/70) and 83.3% (70/84), respectively. There were no significant differences in DCR and ORR between two groups (P〉0.05). The DCR of patients treated with capecitabine monotherapy was significantly higher than that of S-1 monotherapy [94.4%(17/18) and 64.0%(16/25), P=0.028] |
ISSN: | 0253-3766 |
DOI: | 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.009 |