An Assessment of the Optimal Time for Removal of Esophageal Stents Used in the Treatment of an Esophageal Anastomotic Leak or Perforation
Background Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal is in question. This purpose of this investigation was to identify a time for stent removal in patients treated for an acute perfo...
Saved in:
Published in | The Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 100; no. 2; pp. 422 - 428 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier Inc
01.08.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal is in question. This purpose of this investigation was to identify a time for stent removal in patients treated for an acute perforation or anastomotic leak that resulted in sealing of the leak while minimizing the incidence of stent-related complications. Methods Patients undergoing esophageal stent placement for the treatment of an acute perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak were identified from a single institution’s prospectively collected database. Patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Complications were segregated by stent dwell time. Results During the study period, 162 patients underwent esophageal stent placement for an acute perforation (n = 117) or anastomotic leak (n = 45). Patients whose stent was removed in less than 28 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 39% (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.78; p < 0.01), whereas patients whose stent was removed in less than 14 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 56% (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.69; p < 0.001). Conclusions Endoluminal esophageal stent placement is a safe and effective treatment for patients with an acute esophageal perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Removal of stents at 2 weeks for anastomotic leak or 4 weeks for perforation has the potential to significantly decrease the incidence of complications associated with stent use. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal is in question. This purpose of this investigation was to identify a time for stent removal in patients treated for an acute perforation or anastomotic leak that resulted in sealing of the leak while minimizing the incidence of stent-related complications.
Patients undergoing esophageal stent placement for the treatment of an acute perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak were identified from a single institution’s prospectively collected database. Patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Complications were segregated by stent dwell time.
During the study period, 162 patients underwent esophageal stent placement for an acute perforation (n = 117) or anastomotic leak (n = 45). Patients whose stent was removed in less than 28 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 39% (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.78; p < 0.01), whereas patients whose stent was removed in less than 14 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 56% (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.69; p < 0.001).
Endoluminal esophageal stent placement is a safe and effective treatment for patients with an acute esophageal perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Removal of stents at 2 weeks for anastomotic leak or 4 weeks for perforation has the potential to significantly decrease the incidence of complications associated with stent use. BACKGROUNDEsophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal is in question. This purpose of this investigation was to identify a time for stent removal in patients treated for an acute perforation or anastomotic leak that resulted in sealing of the leak while minimizing the incidence of stent-related complications.METHODSPatients undergoing esophageal stent placement for the treatment of an acute perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak were identified from a single institution's prospectively collected database. Patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Complications were segregated by stent dwell time.RESULTSDuring the study period, 162 patients underwent esophageal stent placement for an acute perforation (n = 117) or anastomotic leak (n = 45). Patients whose stent was removed in less than 28 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 39% (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.78; p < 0.01), whereas patients whose stent was removed in less than 14 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 56% (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.69; p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSEndoluminal esophageal stent placement is a safe and effective treatment for patients with an acute esophageal perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Removal of stents at 2 weeks for anastomotic leak or 4 weeks for perforation has the potential to significantly decrease the incidence of complications associated with stent use. Background Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal is in question. This purpose of this investigation was to identify a time for stent removal in patients treated for an acute perforation or anastomotic leak that resulted in sealing of the leak while minimizing the incidence of stent-related complications. Methods Patients undergoing esophageal stent placement for the treatment of an acute perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak were identified from a single institution’s prospectively collected database. Patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Complications were segregated by stent dwell time. Results During the study period, 162 patients underwent esophageal stent placement for an acute perforation (n = 117) or anastomotic leak (n = 45). Patients whose stent was removed in less than 28 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 39% (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.78; p < 0.01), whereas patients whose stent was removed in less than 14 days after placement for an acute perforation realized a stent complication rate that was independently reduced by 56% (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.69; p < 0.001). Conclusions Endoluminal esophageal stent placement is a safe and effective treatment for patients with an acute esophageal perforation or intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Removal of stents at 2 weeks for anastomotic leak or 4 weeks for perforation has the potential to significantly decrease the incidence of complications associated with stent use. |
Author | Ascioti, Anthony J., MD Dake, Megan, PA-C Freeman, Richard K., MD, MBA Mahidhara, Raja S., MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Freeman, Richard K., MD, MBA – sequence: 2 fullname: Ascioti, Anthony J., MD – sequence: 3 fullname: Dake, Megan, PA-C – sequence: 4 fullname: Mahidhara, Raja S., MD |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUk1v1DAQtVAR3Rb-AvKRS4Idr53kgrRU5UNaqYhuz5brjFlvE3vxOJX6E_jXeNkWECdO1njee6N5b87ISYgBCKGc1Zxx9XZXm7yNyVicU90wLmsmatbJZ2TBpWwq1cj-hCwYY6Ja9q08JWeIu1I2pf2CnDaKc7XsmgX5sQp0hQiIE4RMo6N5C_Rqn_1kRrrxE1AXE_0KU7wvH6V_iXG_Nd-gVNe5cJDeIAzUh1_MTQKTn6RM-Bu9CgZznGL2lq7B3NGi-wVSkTfZx_CSPHdmRHj1-J6Tmw-Xm4tP1frq4-eL1bqyUvW56g3jjjPTL9uyqXLGCtG6TjoJShnHJOe2G3o3dOVvUII1UnFj2yVA25hbI87Jm6PuPsXvM2DWk0cL42gCxBk1bxkXQhb9Au2OUJsiYgKn96n4kh40Z_oQhN7pP0HoQxCaCV2CKNTXj1Pm2wmG38Qn5wvg_REAZdd7D0mj9RAsDD6BzXqI_n-mvPtHxI4-eGvGO3gA3MU5heKl5hobzfT14SAO98AlY7L4J34CKMS26Q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_gidisord5030032 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doab067 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2020_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doaa039 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jss_2018_04_020 crossref_primary_10_1159_000527769 crossref_primary_10_1089_ten_tea_2020_0061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thorsurg_2016_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2019_1582329 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9712555 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2021_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1222_3191 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radcr_2018_04_026 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_021_02327_1 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1388_6058 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_13920 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_dox013 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_14492 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2016_06_394 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_09669_6 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojgas_2016_64016 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000006048 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59010136 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_019_05259_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10388_018_0652_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_5408_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soard_2017_12_014 crossref_primary_10_18528_gii160006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_018_4832_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2018_05_010 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEG_0000000000001621 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_optechstcvs_2016_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1308_rcsann_2018_0009 crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2022_2060051 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14040980 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_30802 |
Cites_doi | 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.025 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.016 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.042 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.047 10.1055/s-0033-1344985 10.1177/000313481408000820 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.079 10.1007/BF02293108 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.011 10.1177/0284185113511080 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.061 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons – notice: 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons – notice: Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1552-6259 |
EndPage | 428 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_athoracsur_2015_03_085 26116482 S0003497515005755 1_s2_0_S0003497515005755 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 0R 1- 1B1 1P 1~5 23M 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 53G 55 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M AAEDT AAEJM AAIAV AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAXUO ABFLS ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABWYI ACGFO ACGFS ACIUM ACRZS ADACO ADBBV ADPAM AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFRHN AFTJW AGHFR AGZHU AI. AITUG AJJEV AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALXNB AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BAWUL BELOY C5W CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EFJIC EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FO GBLVA GJ GX1 HVGLF HZ IH2 IHE IPNFZ J1W J5H K K-O KOM L7B M41 MO0 N9A NQ- O9- OA- OK1 OL. OVD P2P P6G PC. R2- RIG ROL RPZ SES SSZ TEORI TR2 UDS UNMZH UV1 VH1 W8F X7M XH2 XPP Z5R ZA5 ZGI ZXP --- --K .1- .55 .FO .GJ 0R~ 1P~ AAEDW ABJNI ADMUD AHPSJ HZ~ AKRWK CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-9a01f10a9475526fac337f85f5e66af0511c8d9fd885fd6302561ac74ee72aba3 |
ISSN | 0003-4975 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 04:40:02 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:03:41 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:06:56 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:30:27 EST 2024 Thu Aug 18 17:13:48 EDT 2022 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c569t-9a01f10a9475526fac337f85f5e66af0511c8d9fd885fd6302561ac74ee72aba3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 26116482 |
PQID | 1701335947 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1701335947 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2015_03_085 pubmed_primary_26116482 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_athoracsur_2015_03_085 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0003497515005755 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2015 text: 2015-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Netherlands |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Netherlands |
PublicationTitle | The Annals of thoracic surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Thorac Surg |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Schaheen, Blackmon, Nason (bib12) 2014; 208 Whitelocke, Maddaus, Andrade, D’Cunha (bib6) 2010; 140 Leers, Holscher (bib4) 2011 Almadi, Bamihriz, Aljebreen (bib11) 2013; 12 Freeman, Vyverberg, Ascioti (bib2) 2011; 92 Blackmon, Santora, Schwarz, Barroso, Dunkin (bib7) 2010; 89 Ahrens, Dieter (bib3) 1974; 12 Hirdes, Vleggaar, de Beule, Siersema (bib13) 2013; 45 Li, Chen, Yang, Lee (bib9) 2009; 88 Freeman, Ascioti, Giannini, Mahidhara (bib1) 2012; 94 Oh, Song, Nam (bib10) 2014; 55 Schweigert, Solymosi, Dubecz, González, Stein, Ofner (bib8) 2014; 80 Freeman, Van Woerkom, Ascioti (bib5) 2007; 83 Leers (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib4) 2011 Almadi (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib11) 2013; 12 Freeman (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib2) 2011; 92 Schweigert (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib8) 2014; 80 Whitelocke (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib6) 2010; 140 Oh (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib10) 2014; 55 Blackmon (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib7) 2010; 89 Freeman (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib5) 2007; 83 Schaheen (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib12) 2014; 208 Li (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib9) 2009; 88 Ahrens (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib3) 1974; 12 Freeman (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib1) 2012; 94 Hirdes (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib13) 2013; 45 |
References_xml | – volume: 89 start-page: 931 year: 2010 end-page: 937 ident: bib7 article-title: Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg contributor: fullname: Dunkin – volume: 12 start-page: 223 year: 1974 end-page: 246 ident: bib3 article-title: Computer methods for sampling from gamma, beta, Poisson and binomial distributions publication-title: Computing contributor: fullname: Dieter – volume: 55 start-page: 1069 year: 2014 end-page: 1075 ident: bib10 article-title: Bleeding after expandable nitinol stent placement in patients with esophageal and upper gastrointestinal obstruction; incidence, management and predictors publication-title: Acta Radiol contributor: fullname: Nam – volume: 80 start-page: 736 year: 2014 end-page: 745 ident: bib8 article-title: One decade of experience with endoscopic stenting for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: brilliant breakthrough or flash in the pan? publication-title: Am Surg contributor: fullname: Ofner – volume: 12 start-page: 337 year: 2013 end-page: 340 ident: bib11 article-title: Fatal aortoesophageal fistula bleeding after stenting for a leak post sleeve gastrectomy publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg contributor: fullname: Aljebreen – start-page: 279 year: 2011 end-page: 285 ident: bib4 article-title: Stenting for esophageal perforation and anastomotic leak publication-title: Difficult decisions in thoracic surgery: an evidence-based approach contributor: fullname: Holscher – volume: 208 start-page: 536 year: 2014 end-page: 543 ident: bib12 article-title: Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review publication-title: Am J Surg contributor: fullname: Nason – volume: 88 start-page: 1700 year: 2009 end-page: 1702 ident: bib9 article-title: A rare complication of esophageal stent: spinal epidural abscess publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg contributor: fullname: Lee – volume: 83 start-page: 2003 year: 2007 end-page: 2008 ident: bib5 article-title: Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg contributor: fullname: Ascioti – volume: 92 start-page: 204 year: 2011 end-page: 208 ident: bib2 article-title: Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of acute intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg contributor: fullname: Ascioti – volume: 94 start-page: 959 year: 2012 end-page: 965 ident: bib1 article-title: Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula or anastomotic leak publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg contributor: fullname: Mahidhara – volume: 140 start-page: e49 year: 2010 end-page: e50 ident: bib6 article-title: Gastroaortic fistula: a rare and lethal complication of esophageal stenting after esophagectomy publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg contributor: fullname: D’Cunha – volume: 45 start-page: 997 year: 2013 end-page: 1005 ident: bib13 article-title: In vitro evaluation of the radial and axial force of self-expanding esophageal stents publication-title: Endoscopy contributor: fullname: Siersema – volume: 12 start-page: 337 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib11 article-title: Fatal aortoesophageal fistula bleeding after stenting for a leak post sleeve gastrectomy publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337 contributor: fullname: Almadi – volume: 83 start-page: 2003 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib5 article-title: Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.025 contributor: fullname: Freeman – volume: 92 start-page: 204 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib2 article-title: Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of acute intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.016 contributor: fullname: Freeman – volume: 140 start-page: e49 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib6 article-title: Gastroaortic fistula: a rare and lethal complication of esophageal stenting after esophagectomy publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.042 contributor: fullname: Whitelocke – volume: 94 start-page: 959 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib1 article-title: Analysis of unsuccessful esophageal stent placements for esophageal perforation, fistula or anastomotic leak publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.047 contributor: fullname: Freeman – volume: 45 start-page: 997 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib13 article-title: In vitro evaluation of the radial and axial force of self-expanding esophageal stents publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344985 contributor: fullname: Hirdes – volume: 80 start-page: 736 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib8 article-title: One decade of experience with endoscopic stenting for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: brilliant breakthrough or flash in the pan? publication-title: Am Surg doi: 10.1177/000313481408000820 contributor: fullname: Schweigert – volume: 88 start-page: 1700 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib9 article-title: A rare complication of esophageal stent: spinal epidural abscess publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.079 contributor: fullname: Li – volume: 12 start-page: 223 year: 1974 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib3 article-title: Computer methods for sampling from gamma, beta, Poisson and binomial distributions publication-title: Computing doi: 10.1007/BF02293108 contributor: fullname: Ahrens – volume: 208 start-page: 536 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib12 article-title: Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review publication-title: Am J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.011 contributor: fullname: Schaheen – start-page: 279 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib4 article-title: Stenting for esophageal perforation and anastomotic leak contributor: fullname: Leers – volume: 55 start-page: 1069 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib10 article-title: Bleeding after expandable nitinol stent placement in patients with esophageal and upper gastrointestinal obstruction; incidence, management and predictors publication-title: Acta Radiol doi: 10.1177/0284185113511080 contributor: fullname: Oh – volume: 89 start-page: 931 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085_bib7 article-title: Utility of removable esophageal covered self-expanding metal stents for leak and fistula management publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.061 contributor: fullname: Blackmon |
SSID | ssj0002155 |
Score | 2.403694 |
Snippet | Background Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for... Esophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for stent removal... BACKGROUNDEsophageal stent for the treatment of a perforation or anastomotic leak has been shown to be effective and safe. However, the optimal timing for... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 422 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anastomotic Leak - surgery Cardiothoracic Surgery Device Removal - standards Esophageal Perforation - surgery Esophagus - surgery Humans Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Stents Surgery Time Factors Young Adult |
Title | An Assessment of the Optimal Time for Removal of Esophageal Stents Used in the Treatment of an Esophageal Anastomotic Leak or Perforation |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0003497515005755 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.085 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116482 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1701335947 |
Volume | 100 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbKcuGCQLzKS0biVqWKkzgPcYpgYbWogNhW6s1yHIdtV00QSTnwD_hn_CxmYuexsCuWvURVYk_izNeZsfPNmJCXGFWwQEUOy7LQCVjAHMnz2FF5xJjy3FgxTBRefAiPVsHxmq8nk18j1tK-yebqx4V5JdfRKpwDvWKW7H9othcKJ-A36BeOoGE4XknHaTlL-8qa3df-j2AEdph1v9mZgt6f9a76bmLOQ9y0ACwIlgBp2ty2Va3zjuu47EnnSA4ox63TUkKUiMQ9hSVZz5DG_qllxg-a3Q7AG8oyN6fQREGvepR_3WabaG0XX21u_-z9vEcf-OXK8AxscYPZcX_xjTR8ooX-MiB7IU83OdaebgXKrZydzMcLGoz3dLrBSPu48R0_Z6Rdd4RGb2RyA5PXbL13YFLN_3IMZo1iC_pphw1jRlofbwvcmj2Dztfi_sNH9szFjhS3FYMkgZKE6wuQdIPc9KKE4zLAu_VANoLAind7N-LQLKfMMA0vfqbLAqXLJkJtQLS8Q27bmQxNDSzvkoku75GfaUkHSNKqoAAsaiFJEZIUMEMtJPH6ADJqIEkRknRTtj17SGJTWY5bjyBJEZIU5I4geZ-s3h4uXx85drcPR_EwaZxEuqxgrkyCiHMvLKTy_aiIecF1GMoCnAdTcZ4UeQzn8tDHYJ1JFQVaR57MpP-AHJRVqR8Rynmsi1wr6YK3SUC68hINMx8_weJHyp0S1r1a8dUUdRH_UuyURJ0ORJe0DG5W19Ye1IKJ2hOuODE1nyKYKGCmN4eer_qeNqw14aoAcF7hvi86hQuw_Pg5T5a62sP9IjC0Pof3NSUPDRL60XghY2EQe4-vMdIn5Nbwt3xKDppve_0MIu8me96C-jcgg90M |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,27957,27958 |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+Assessment+of+the+Optimal+Time+for+Removal+of+Esophageal+Stents+Used+in+the+Treatment+of+an+Esophageal+Anastomotic+Leak+or+Perforation&rft.jtitle=The+Annals+of+thoracic+surgery&rft.au=Freeman%2C+Richard+K.&rft.au=Ascioti%2C+Anthony+J.&rft.au=Dake%2C+Megan&rft.au=Mahidhara%2C+Raja+S.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.athoracsur.2015.03.085&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_athoracsur_2015_03_085 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00034975%2FS0003497515X00075%2Fcov150h.gif |