Evaluation of Bitemark Analysis’s Potential Application in Forensic Identification: A Systematic Review

Bitemark analysis involves the examination of both patterned injuries and contextual circumstances, combining morphological and positional data. Considering the uniqueness of human dentition, bitemarks caused by teeth on skin or impressions on flexible surfaces could assist in human identification....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiagnostics (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 11; p. 1180
Main Authors Christoloukas, Nikolaos, Mitsea, Anastasia, Rontogianni, Aliki, Papadakis, Evangelos, Angelopoulos, Christos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 01.06.2024
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI10.3390/diagnostics14111180

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Bitemark analysis involves the examination of both patterned injuries and contextual circumstances, combining morphological and positional data. Considering the uniqueness of human dentition, bitemarks caused by teeth on skin or impressions on flexible surfaces could assist in human identification. Aims: to investigate the available literature systematically and evaluate the scientific evidence published over the past decade concerning the potential application of bitemark analysis in forensic identification. Methods: Two researchers meticulously searched electronic databases from January 2012 to December 2023, including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Adhering to the PRISMA statement guidelines, this review employed appropriate medical subject headings (MeSHs) and free-text synonyms. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied during article retrieval. Results: The findings yielded controversial outcomes. Approximately two-thirds of the articles concluded that bitemark analysis is useful in forensic identification, while the remaining articles did not report statistically significant outcomes and cautioned against relying solely on bitemark analysis for identification. Conclusions: The authors assert that bitemark analysis can be a reliable and complementary method for forensic identification, contingent upon the establishment and adoption of a universally accepted global protocol for data collection, processing, and interpretation. Undoubtedly, recent years have witnessed a notable increase in research focused on bitemark identification, driven by the goal of achieving quantitative, objective, reproducible, and accurate results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14111180