Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking. This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 337 - 346.e3 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.02.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking.
This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45–75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist’s experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393).
From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group.
In this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548). |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background and AimsArtificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking. MethodsThis multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45–75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist’s experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393). ResultsFrom November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group. ConclusionsIn this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. ( ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548). Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking. This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45–75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist’s experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393). From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group. In this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking.BACKGROUND AND AIMSArtificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking.This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45-75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist's experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393).METHODSThis multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45-75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist's experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393).From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group.RESULTSFrom November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group.In this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548).CONCLUSIONSIn this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548). |
Author | Sung, Joseph J.Y. Xu, Weiran Liu, Yunpeng Shutian, Zhang Cai, Shuntian Yuan, Peng Lau, James Y.W. Ma, Tantan Li, Fudong Xu, Hong Xu, Hongzhi Mak, Joyce W.Y. Wang, Jing Ye, Zhenshi Wu, Qi Lam, Thomas Y.T. Liang, Xiong Li, Xue Rong, Long Cao, Tingting Zhao, Guijun Liu, Guanyi Tang, Raymond S.Y. Wong, Sunny H. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hong surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Hong organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Raymond S.Y. surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Raymond S.Y. organization: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Thomas Y.T. surname: Lam fullname: Lam, Thomas Y.T. organization: Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Guijun surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Guijun organization: Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, China – sequence: 5 givenname: James Y.W. surname: Lau fullname: Lau, James Y.W. organization: Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Yunpeng surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Yunpeng organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Qi surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Qi organization: Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Long surname: Rong fullname: Rong, Long organization: Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China – sequence: 9 givenname: Weiran surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Weiran organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China – sequence: 10 givenname: Xue surname: Li fullname: Li, Xue organization: Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, China – sequence: 11 givenname: Sunny H. surname: Wong fullname: Wong, Sunny H. organization: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China – sequence: 12 givenname: Shuntian surname: Cai fullname: Cai, Shuntian organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China – sequence: 13 givenname: Jing surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Jing organization: Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China – sequence: 14 givenname: Guanyi surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Guanyi organization: Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China – sequence: 15 givenname: Tantan surname: Ma fullname: Ma, Tantan organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China – sequence: 16 givenname: Xiong surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Xiong organization: Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, China – sequence: 17 givenname: Joyce W.Y. surname: Mak fullname: Mak, Joyce W.Y. organization: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China – sequence: 18 givenname: Hongzhi surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Hongzhi organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China – sequence: 19 givenname: Peng surname: Yuan fullname: Yuan, Peng organization: Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China – sequence: 20 givenname: Tingting surname: Cao fullname: Cao, Tingting organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China – sequence: 21 givenname: Fudong surname: Li fullname: Li, Fudong organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China – sequence: 22 givenname: Zhenshi surname: Ye fullname: Ye, Zhenshi organization: Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China – sequence: 23 givenname: Zhang surname: Shutian fullname: Shutian, Zhang organization: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China – sequence: 24 givenname: Joseph J.Y. orcidid: 0000-0003-3125-5199 surname: Sung fullname: Sung, Joseph J.Y. email: josephsung@ntu.edu.sg organization: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFks1u1DAUhSNURH_gAdigLNlM8E_im4CENBrxU6kIiZa15XFuBg8ee7CdSsOKd-gb9klwOgOLSpSVr6XznSuf49PiyHmHRfGckooSKl6tK736VjHCWEWgIkQ8Kk5oU7MZAK2PDjNvRHNcnMa4JoR1dQdPimPetIKLVpwUu3lIZjDaKFueu4TWmhU6jbe_buYxmpiwLxfeeuej9ttdOfhwdw-oU0YWKmtDeakDojNu9bqcl59Gm4zGbBbKL8r1fmN-3rm4FLy1ebwKed3T4vGgbMRnh_Os-Pr-3dXi4-zi84fzxfxiphsBaQYKQCilgFKgjNc1QE1a2nFsBQzLhmvFaTso6NSy1p3ClgH0WiwVsr5ra35WvNz7boP_MWJMcmOizg9VDv0YJRMdzyuAd1n64iAdlxvs5TaYjQo7-SeuLKB7gQ4-xoDDXwklcqpErmWuRE6VSAIyV5IZuMdok1QyUxzK2AfJN3sSczzXBoOM2kzl9GaKX_bePEi_vUdra5zRyn7HHca1H4PLuUsqY2bk5fRZpr_CWKaBN9mg-7fBf5b_BpmPz5Q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000002077 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848251314829 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2025_1523684 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16241 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_79570 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_6947 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2589_7500_23_00242_X crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14232762 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2025_01_192 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13195842 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000001068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gastha_2024_08_021 crossref_primary_10_2147_DDDT_S425860 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2025_217461 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16847 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2024_57241 crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_91 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10151_024_02917_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2023_10_019 crossref_primary_10_37126_aige_v5_i3_92742 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2024_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1159_000543345 crossref_primary_10_4103_singaporemedj_SMJ_2023_193 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0045_1802655 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2210_7999 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15215126 crossref_primary_10_1158_2159_8290_CD_23_1199 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph22010098 crossref_primary_10_7326_M22_3678 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_024_01588_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_1253_23_00104_8 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_155384_1 crossref_primary_10_2196_52073 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes15060710 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2023_09_004 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v16_i6_335 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_vgie_2024_09_013 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2024_333227 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmorw_2024_100046 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_45355_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737140_2023_2215436 crossref_primary_10_18528_ijgii240013 crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14627 crossref_primary_10_11569_wcjd_v32_i3_171 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13045_023_01514_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000038938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2023_102341 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43472_023_00118_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_0954898X_2024_2426580 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15092410 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2024_12_023 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2024_1406842 crossref_primary_10_37126_aige_v5_i2_90704 crossref_primary_10_7326_ANNALS_24_00981 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2521_5169 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scrs_2024_101007 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002286 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2038_7078 crossref_primary_10_2196_42665 crossref_primary_10_7326_M22_2619 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_70117_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_08_033 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_37509 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dld_2023_10_018 crossref_primary_10_35712_aig_v5_i2_91336 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_51859 crossref_primary_10_4103_singaporemedj_SMJ_2023_203 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2328_2844 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16491 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2023_001247 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2024_04_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2024_01_021 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2280_7096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_igie_2023_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgh3_70018 crossref_primary_10_1177_17562848231218570 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43162_024_00371_z crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2023_2280773 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5691_22_09810_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_024_03365_x crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_45278 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2023_07_044 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12144840 crossref_primary_10_3390_math12244041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2023_107356 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_1253_24_00161_4 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002396 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lfs_2024_122462 crossref_primary_10_33878_2073_7556_2023_22_2_92_102 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_16135 |
Cites_doi | 10.7326/M20-6689 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306 10.1055/a-1031-7657 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324471 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x 10.1093/jnci/djy222 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304880 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.014 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 10.1136/gut.51.1.130 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.003 10.1007/s11605-020-04802-4 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.014 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3 10.1111/jgh.15368 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30009-1 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.439 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260 10.1038/ajg.2012.135 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308362 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.025 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023 The Authors The Authors Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors – notice: The Authors – notice: Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1542-7714 |
EndPage | 346.e3 |
ExternalDocumentID | 35863686 10_1016_j_cgh_2022_07_006 S1542356522006735 1_s2_0_S1542356522006735 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .FO 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 29B 4.4 457 53G 5GY 5VS AAEDT AAEDW AAFWJ AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAXUO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ACGFS ADBBV AENEX AEVXI AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AITUG AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP BELOY C45 C5W CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD F5P FDB FRP HZ~ IHE KOM M41 MO0 N9A NQ- O9- OBH OC. ON0 OVD P2P ROL RPZ SEL SES TEORI UV1 XH2 Z5R ADPAM AFCTW RIG 6I. AAFTH AAIAV AGZHU ALXNB ZA5 AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-7a776aaa71171234477408193e867fb53ca318fa79ab4c9ae8277dc6bae2d9843 |
ISSN | 1542-3565 1542-7714 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 21 11:49:07 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:52:29 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:50:48 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:38:35 EST 2024 Tue Feb 25 20:04:43 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:33:57 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | CC PP aOR Artificial Intelligence AMR CI AI ITT IQR SSL Colorectal Cancer Screening ADR FIT APC CRC Colonoscopy BBPS BMI PDR polyp detection rate adenoma miss rate per protocol interquartile range adjusted odds ratio sessile serrated lesion Boston Bowel Preparation Scale colorectal cancer body mass index fecal immunochemical test conventional colonoscopy adenoma detection rate intention to treat confidence interval adenoma per colonoscopy |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c567t-7a776aaa71171234477408193e867fb53ca318fa79ab4c9ae8277dc6bae2d9843 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3125-5199 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1542356522006735 |
PMID | 35863686 |
PQID | 2693776739 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2693776739 pubmed_primary_35863686 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_07_006 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_07_006 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_07_006 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1542356522006735 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_cgh_2022_07_006 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Ardila, Kiraly, Bharadwaj (bib26) 2019; 25 Corley, Jensen, Marks (bib4) 2014; 370 Meester, van Herk, Lansdorp-Vogelaar (bib24) 2020; 159 Gong, Wu, Zhang (bib14) 2020; 5 Zauber, Winawer, O'Brien (bib1) 2012; 366 le Clercq, Bouwens, Rondagh (bib5) 2014; 63 Wieszczy, Waldmann, Løberg (bib6) 2021; 160 Hassan, Senore, Radaelli (bib9) 2017; 66 Singh, Turner, Xue (bib2) 2006; 295 Repici, Spadaccini, Antonelli (bib15) 2022; 71 Kamba, Tamai, Horiuchi (bib17) 2021; 93 Lui, Kyaw, Lam (bib25) 2021; 36 Baxter, Goldwasser, Paszat (bib21) 2009; 150 Ng, Tsoi, Hirai (bib8) 2012; 107 Wong, Chiu, Kim (bib19) 2019; 89 Lai, Calderwood, Doros (bib18) 2009; 69 Song, Emilsson, Bozorg (bib23) 2020; 5 Rodriguez-Ruiz, Lang, Gubern-Merida (bib27) 2019; 111 Pohl, Anderson, Aguilera-Fish (bib22) 2021; 174 Zhao, Wang, Pan (bib3) 2019; 156 Luo, Zhang, Liu (bib16) 2021; 25 Bisschops, East, Hassan (bib7) 2019; 51 Tang, Lee, Chang (bib10) 2022; 20 Wang, Liu, Berzin (bib12) 2020; 5 Misawa, Kudo, Mori (bib11) 2018; 154 Morris, Rutter, Finan (bib20) 2015; 64 Su, Li, Shao (bib13) 2020; 91 Morris (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib20) 2015; 64 Zauber (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib1) 2012; 366 Hassan (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib9) 2017; 66 Lai (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib18) 2009; 69 Tang (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib10) 2022; 20 Wang (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib12) 2020; 5 Gong (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib14) 2020; 5 Wong (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib19) 2019; 89 Ardila (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib26) 2019; 25 Luo (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib16) 2021; 25 Meester (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib24) 2020; 159 Ng (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib8) 2012; 107 Lui (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib25) 2021; 36 Corley (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib4) 2014; 370 Baxter (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib21) 2009; 150 Wieszczy (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib6) 2021; 160 Song (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib23) 2020; 5 Rodriguez-Ruiz (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib27) 2019; 111 Kamba (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib17) 2021; 93 Repici (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib15) 2022; 71 Pohl (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib22) 2021; 174 Luo (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib28) 2021; 25 Dixon (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib30) 2002; 51 Singh (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib2) 2006; 295 Bisschops (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib7) 2019; 51 le Clercq (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib5) 2014; 63 Misawa (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib11) 2018; 154 Zhao (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib3) 2019; 156 Su (10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib13) 2020; 91 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib29 |
References_xml | – volume: 20 start-page: 372 year: 2022 end-page: 380.e2 ident: bib10 article-title: Two vs one forward view examination of right colon on adenoma detection: an international multicenter randomized trial publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 156 start-page: 1661 year: 2019 end-page: 1674.e11 ident: bib3 article-title: Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 174 start-page: 1377 year: 2021 end-page: 1384 ident: bib22 article-title: Recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps after incomplete resection publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 160 start-page: 1067 year: 2021 end-page: 1074.e6 ident: bib6 article-title: Colonoscopist performance and colorectal cancer risk after adenoma removal to stratify surveillance: two nationwide observational studies publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 150 start-page: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 8 ident: bib21 article-title: Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 159 start-page: 105 year: 2020 end-page: 118.e25 ident: bib24 article-title: Prevalence and clinical features of sessile serrated polyps: a systematic review publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 25 start-page: 2011 year: 2021 end-page: 2018 ident: bib16 article-title: Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for detection of colon polyps: a prospective, randomized cohort study publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 63 start-page: 957 year: 2014 end-page: 963 ident: bib5 article-title: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study publication-title: Gut – volume: 366 start-page: 687 year: 2012 end-page: 696 ident: bib1 article-title: Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 93 start-page: AB195 year: 2021 ident: bib17 article-title: A multicentre randomized controlled trial to verify the reducibility of adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted with artificial intelligence based software publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 89 start-page: 607 year: 2019 end-page: 613.e1 ident: bib19 article-title: Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 64 start-page: 1248 year: 2015 end-page: 1256 ident: bib20 article-title: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service publication-title: Gut – volume: 25 start-page: 954 year: 2019 end-page: 961 ident: bib26 article-title: End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography publication-title: Nat Med – volume: 295 start-page: 2366 year: 2006 end-page: 2373 ident: bib2 article-title: Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies publication-title: JAMA – volume: 91 start-page: 415 year: 2020 end-page: 424.e4 ident: bib13 article-title: Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos) publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 71 start-page: 757 year: 2022 end-page: 765 ident: bib15 article-title: Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials publication-title: Gut – volume: 69 start-page: 620 year: 2009 end-page: 625 ident: bib18 article-title: The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 51 start-page: 1155 year: 2019 end-page: 1179 ident: bib7 article-title: Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019 publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 36 start-page: 1656 year: 2021 end-page: 1662 ident: bib25 article-title: Prevalence and risk factors for sessile serrated lesions in an average risk colorectal cancer screening population publication-title: J Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 370 start-page: 1298 year: 2014 end-page: 1306 ident: bib4 article-title: Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 5 start-page: 537 year: 2020 end-page: 547 ident: bib23 article-title: Risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after polypectomy: a Swedish record-linkage study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 5 start-page: 352 year: 2020 end-page: 361 ident: bib14 article-title: Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 111 start-page: 916 year: 2019 end-page: 922 ident: bib27 article-title: Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 154 start-page: 2027 year: 2018 end-page: 2029.e3 ident: bib11 article-title: Artificial intelligence-assisted polyp detection for colonoscopy: initial experience publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 5 start-page: 343 year: 2020 end-page: 351 ident: bib12 article-title: Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 107 start-page: 1165 year: 2012 end-page: 1173 ident: bib8 article-title: The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 66 start-page: 1949 year: 2017 end-page: 1955 ident: bib9 article-title: Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme publication-title: Gut – volume: 174 start-page: 1377 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib22 article-title: Recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps after incomplete resection publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M20-6689 – volume: 150 start-page: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib21 article-title: Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306 – volume: 51 start-page: 1155 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib7 article-title: Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019 publication-title: Endoscopy doi: 10.1055/a-1031-7657 – volume: 71 start-page: 757 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib15 article-title: Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324471 – volume: 366 start-page: 687 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib1 article-title: Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 – volume: 25 start-page: 954 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib26 article-title: End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x – volume: 111 start-page: 916 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib27 article-title: Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy222 – volume: 63 start-page: 957 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib5 article-title: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304880 – volume: 20 start-page: 372 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib10 article-title: Two vs one forward view examination of right colon on adenoma detection: an international multicenter randomized trial publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.014 – volume: 91 start-page: 415 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib13 article-title: Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos) publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.026 – volume: 51 start-page: 130 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib30 article-title: Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gut.51.1.130 – volume: 154 start-page: 2027 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib11 article-title: Artificial intelligence-assisted polyp detection for colonoscopy: initial experience publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.003 – volume: 25 start-page: 2011 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib16 article-title: Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for detection of colon polyps: a prospective, randomized cohort study publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04802-4 – volume: 5 start-page: 343 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib12 article-title: Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X – volume: 89 start-page: 607 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib19 article-title: Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.014 – volume: 69 start-page: 620 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib18 article-title: The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057 – volume: 5 start-page: 352 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib14 article-title: Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30413-3 – volume: 36 start-page: 1656 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib25 article-title: Prevalence and risk factors for sessile serrated lesions in an average risk colorectal cancer screening population publication-title: J Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1111/jgh.15368 – volume: 295 start-page: 2366 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib2 article-title: Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2366 – volume: 5 start-page: 537 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib23 article-title: Risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after polypectomy: a Swedish record-linkage study publication-title: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30009-1 – volume: 93 start-page: AB195 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib17 article-title: A multicentre randomized controlled trial to verify the reducibility of adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted with artificial intelligence based software publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.439 – ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib29 – volume: 25 start-page: 2011 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib28 article-title: Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for detection of colon polyps: a prospective, randomized cohort study publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04802-4 – volume: 160 start-page: 1067 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib6 article-title: Colonoscopist performance and colorectal cancer risk after adenoma removal to stratify surveillance: two nationwide observational studies publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.009 – volume: 156 start-page: 1661 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib3 article-title: Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260 – volume: 107 start-page: 1165 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib8 article-title: The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.135 – volume: 64 start-page: 1248 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib20 article-title: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308362 – volume: 370 start-page: 1298 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib4 article-title: Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086 – volume: 66 start-page: 1949 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib9 article-title: Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme publication-title: Gut – volume: 159 start-page: 105 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006_bib24 article-title: Prevalence and clinical features of sessile serrated polyps: a systematic review publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.025 |
SSID | ssj0029497 |
Score | 2.6371315 |
Snippet | Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter... Background and AimsArtificial intelligence (AI)–assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from... Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 337 |
SubjectTerms | Adenoma - diagnosis Artificial Intelligence Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Screening Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Early Detection of Cancer Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
Title | Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1542356522006735 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1542356522006735 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863686 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2693776739 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLWGVkJsEG-Gl4zEiirRjO3YE3ajCqioyqKdiimbyPE4bUdtgiaTRbviH_gc_oYv4dqOk7RMC3QT5WXncU98Hzn3GqE3YqYY6BUexBFhAdNDFkhJokDTNKWZKZilTL7zzme-tc8-TaNpr_ezw1qqlmmozlfmldxEqrAP5GqyZP9Dsk2nsAPWQb6wBAnD8p9kPF5Ypo-rl9GW1vQEBril0khxZsIDRV6YDBTHzzTbZqgzkQMj9gV844aAU2c_jzdsXq4hbsKhXZnPitPjc9uPJbafwOrEPF_XtN30OZaHsoSTbNu2wNMRqL3lhRD-tLJqr6hVp40euIFnV56dmrSavfAgbAhDDriOz7RxEE6aI1-PpA33fqyO51XejWIQ6onPPrTm02susD_BvDOpBm4yiVC3-4Rwmad-CHdJ1jVUSWc8pq6iTK3aKeOhpisVh4thzEN1aP5QEWIrug4uFem2an_P3IG5KULsLD_RLbROwEeBQXZ9vL37Zbvx92Pm5vbxT-F_qlt64aULXWUWXeX2WPNncg_drf0WPHYgvI96On-Abu_UzIyH6KzFIu5i8df3Hx6FuINCDCjELQqxQyFuUPgOj3EHg7jFIG4xiC0GH6H9D-8nm1tBPa1HoCIuloGQQnAppRgOBdhNjIEHYgxTqkdcZGlElQRFk0kRy5SpWOoRvN6Z4qnUZBaPGH2M1vIi108RFkOhNM8yrQeKgTMuNbgzXGWDGROUSdJHA_9WE1XXvDdTr5wkntw4T0AQiRFEMjBMDN5Hb5sm31zBl-tOJl5Uic9kBt2bAKquayRWNdJlPbKUyTAp4eTkD6T1EWta1gayM3z_dsHXHkUJKA_zR1DmuqjKhHDwTgR0HffREwev5qFpNOKUj_izm130ObrTfucv0NpyUemXYL8v01f1d_IbSLHxdg |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Artificial+Intelligence%E2%80%93Assisted+Colonoscopy+for+Colorectal+Cancer+Screening%3A+A+Multicenter+Randomized+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical+gastroenterology+and+hepatology&rft.au=Xu%2C+Hong&rft.au=Tang%2C+Raymond+S.Y.&rft.au=Lam%2C+Thomas+Y.T.&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Guijun&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=346.e3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cgh.2022.07.006&rft.externalDocID=S1542356522006735 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15423565%2FS1542356522X00153%2Fcov150h.gif |