Intralocus sexual conflict and insecticide resistance

The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the al...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 283; no. 1843; p. 20161429
Main Authors Hawkes, M. F., Gamble, C. E., Turner, E. C. R., Carey, M. R., Wedell, N., Hosken, D. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 30.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0962-8452
1471-2954
1471-2954
DOI10.1098/rspb.2016.1429

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the allele confers a pleiotropic fitness benefit to females but a cost to males, and exhibits little sexual dimorphism in conferred insecticide resistance. It is unclear whether these sexually antagonistic effects also exist in current populations that have naturally evolved with insecticides, where genetic modifiers that offset male costs might be expected to evolve. Here, we explore these issues using Drosophila melanogaster caught recently from an Australian population in which the BA allele naturally segregates. While we find increased fecundity in insecticide-resistant BA females and no consistent evidence of fitness costs in males, experimental evolution indicates balancing selection at the locus. We suggest that this apparent discrepancy may be due to reduced investment in reproduction in resistant males. Our results at the population level are consistent with previous work, and suggest that individual-level fitness assays do not always capture sexually antagonistic fitness effects that emerge in a population context.
AbstractList The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the allele confers a pleiotropic fitness benefit to females but a cost to males, and exhibits little sexual dimorphism in conferred insecticide resistance. It is unclear whether these sexually antagonistic effects also exist in current populations that have naturally evolved with insecticides, where genetic modifiers that offset male costs might be expected to evolve. Here, we explore these issues using Drosophila melanogaster caught recently from an Australian population in which the BA allele naturally segregates. While we find increased fecundity in insecticide-resistant BA females and no consistent evidence of fitness costs in males, experimental evolution indicates balancing selection at the locus. We suggest that this apparent discrepancy may be due to reduced investment in reproduction in resistant males. Our results at the population level are consistent with previous work, and suggest that individual-level fitness assays do not always capture sexually antagonistic fitness effects that emerge in a population context.The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the allele confers a pleiotropic fitness benefit to females but a cost to males, and exhibits little sexual dimorphism in conferred insecticide resistance. It is unclear whether these sexually antagonistic effects also exist in current populations that have naturally evolved with insecticides, where genetic modifiers that offset male costs might be expected to evolve. Here, we explore these issues using Drosophila melanogaster caught recently from an Australian population in which the BA allele naturally segregates. While we find increased fecundity in insecticide-resistant BA females and no consistent evidence of fitness costs in males, experimental evolution indicates balancing selection at the locus. We suggest that this apparent discrepancy may be due to reduced investment in reproduction in resistant males. Our results at the population level are consistent with previous work, and suggest that individual-level fitness assays do not always capture sexually antagonistic fitness effects that emerge in a population context.
The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the allele confers a pleiotropic fitness benefit to females but a cost to males, and exhibits little sexual dimorphism in conferred insecticide resistance. It is unclear whether these sexually antagonistic effects also exist in current populations that have naturally evolved with insecticides, where genetic modifiers that offset male costs might be expected to evolve. Here, we explore these issues using Drosophila melanogaster caught recently from an Australian population in which the BA allele naturally segregates. While we find increased fecundity in insecticide-resistant BA females and no consistent evidence of fitness costs in males, experimental evolution indicates balancing selection at the locus. We suggest that this apparent discrepancy may be due to reduced investment in reproduction in resistant males. Our results at the population level are consistent with previous work, and suggest that individual-level fitness assays do not always capture sexually antagonistic fitness effects that emerge in a population context.
The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict when introgressed into the Canton-S background, whose collection predates the widespread use of insecticides. In this genetic background, the allele confers a pleiotropic fitness benefit to females but a cost to males, and exhibits little sexual dimorphism in conferred insecticide resistance. It is unclear whether these sexually antagonistic effects also exist in current populations that have naturally evolved with insecticides, where genetic modifiers that offset male costs might be expected to evolve. Here, we explore these issues using Drosophila melanogaster caught recently from an Australian population in which the BA allele naturally segregates. While we find increased fecundity in insecticide-resistant BA females and no consistent evidence of fitness costs in males, experimental evolution indicates balancing selection at the locus. We suggest that this apparent discrepancy may be due to reduced investment in reproduction in resistant males. Our results at the population level are consistent with previous work, and suggest that individual-level fitness assays do not always capture sexually antagonistic fitness effects that emerge in a population context.
Author Turner, E. C. R.
Hawkes, M. F.
Wedell, N.
Gamble, C. E.
Carey, M. R.
Hosken, D. J.
AuthorAffiliation Centre for Ecology and Conservation , University of Exeter , Tremough, Penryn TR10 9FE , UK
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Centre for Ecology and Conservation , University of Exeter , Tremough, Penryn TR10 9FE , UK
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: M. F.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8762-995X
  surname: Hawkes
  fullname: Hawkes, M. F.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: C. E.
  surname: Gamble
  fullname: Gamble, C. E.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: E. C. R.
  surname: Turner
  fullname: Turner, E. C. R.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M. R.
  surname: Carey
  fullname: Carey, M. R.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: N.
  surname: Wedell
  fullname: Wedell, N.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: D. J.
  surname: Hosken
  fullname: Hosken, D. J.
  email: d.j.hosken@exeter.ac.uk
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkctPFTEYxRsDkQu6dWlm6WYufT82JkpQSUggPtZNp9PR4tz22naI17_eDvdCEINx1TQ953y_fucQ7IUYHAAvEFwiqORxyutuiSHiS0SxegIWiArUYsXoHlhAxXErKcMH4DDnKwihYpI9BQdYSIkEJQvAzkJJZox2yk12PyczNjaGYfS2NCb0jQ_Z2eKt712TXPa5mGDdM7A_mDG757vzCHx5d_r55EN7fvH-7OTNeWsZF6UVqmewF4r3hFsqnZAdV6bHhFUy0UHcETgw2iGFhsEoYjvYK06tHIQiaqDkCLze5q6nbuV6625g9Tr5lUkbHY3Xf74E_01_jdeaIcKZEDXg1S4gxR-Ty0WvfLZuHE1wccoaSS5J3SOF_yGlRHEFGavSl_ex7nhu11oFdCuwKeac3KCtL6b4OFP6USOo5_b03J6e29Nze9W2fGC7TX7U8H1rSHFTe4jWu7LRV3FKoV71x0-Xb6-xJH5m11ASBCscRvqXX--iJNE-58ndfO9B_N_TyL-mPcL4G2b60QM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41576_018_0083_1
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_2412315121
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41559_023_02019_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_jzo_12780
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_16355
crossref_primary_10_1111_eva_70003
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_15115
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4744
crossref_primary_10_1086_698198
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrg_2017_83
crossref_primary_10_1111_1744_7917_13475
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10519_017_9850_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_jeb_13555
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_024_49344_4
Cites_doi 10.1093/genetics/85.1.171
10.18637/jss.v012.i05
10.1002/ps.1567
10.1093/oso/9780195076912.001.0001
10.1098/rspb.2008.1878
10.1371/journal.pgen.1002917
10.2307/3544943
10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.058
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01649.x
10.1371/journal.pgen.1000998
10.1534/genetics.109.101444
10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.02.008
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00915.x
10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x
10.1126/science.1100522
10.7717/peerj.616
10.1126/science.1074170
10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00064-X
10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.023
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00346.x
10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090518
10.1002/9781118912591
10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x
10.1093/nar/gkp045
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02271.x
10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.054
10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
10.1093/beheco/arq193
10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.005
10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
10.1534/genetics.106.066597
10.18637/jss.v067.i01
10.1186/s12915-015-0143-3
10.1007/s00265-007-0353-y
10.1098/rspb.2011.2676
10.1198/000313001317097960
10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053
10.1002/ps.1986
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02263.x
10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.004
10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005
10.1098/rstb.1998.0321
10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.024
10.1038/sj.hdy.6800562
10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.023
10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00056.x
10.1038/srep14529
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 The Author(s)
2016 The Author(s).
2016 The Author(s) 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 The Author(s)
– notice: 2016 The Author(s).
– notice: 2016 The Author(s) 2016
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7SN
C1K
5PM
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2016.1429
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Ecology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Ecology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

MEDLINE
Ecology Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
Biology
DocumentTitleAlternate Sexual conflict and pesticide resistance
EISSN 1471-2954
EndPage 20161429
ExternalDocumentID PMC5136577
27881743
10_1098_rspb_2016_1429
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Natural Environment Research Council
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000270
– fundername: Leverhulme Trust
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000275
– fundername: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  grantid: PhD studentship
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268
– fundername: Royal Society
  grantid: Wolfson award
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000288
– fundername: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
– fundername: ;
– fundername: ;
  grantid: Wolfson award
– fundername: ;
  grantid: PhD studentship
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
0R~
29P
2WC
36Y
4.4
5RE
85S
AACGO
AANCE
ABBHK
ABPLY
ABPTK
ABTLG
ACIWK
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACQIA
ADBBV
ADIYS
ADULT
ADZLD
AEUPB
AEXZC
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BTFSW
CS3
DCCCD
DIK
DNJUQ
DOOOF
DWIUU
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
GX1
HYE
HZ~
JAAYA
JBMMH
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JSG
JSODD
JST
K-O
KQ8
MRS
O9-
OK1
OP1
RHF
RPM
RRY
SA0
TR2
V1E
W8F
~02
AAYXX
ABXSQ
ACHIC
ADQXQ
ALMYZ
AQVQM
CITATION
H13
IPSME
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7SN
C1K
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-79d50d796d36c48e78b69ad2350967b02b30f54b191ffa93cb0d964c8f7939f43
ISSN 0962-8452
1471-2954
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:15:26 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 13:06:34 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 10:47:09 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:08:34 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:06:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:50 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 17 02:37:13 EST 2024
Tue May 24 16:17:58 EDT 2022
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1843
Keywords sexual conflict
Cyp6g1
insecticide resistance
Language English
License http://royalsocietypublishing.org/licence: Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
2016 The Author(s).
Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c567t-79d50d796d36c48e78b69ad2350967b02b30f54b191ffa93cb0d964c8f7939f43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Electronic supplementary material is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3573201.
ORCID 0000-0001-8762-995X
OpenAccessLink http://hdl.handle.net/10871/29282
PMID 27881743
PQID 1843969055
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5136577
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2016_1429
proquest_miscellaneous_1843969055
royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2016_1429
pubmed_primary_27881743
proquest_miscellaneous_1868309840
crossref_citationtrail_10_1098_rspb_2016_1429
royalsociety_journals_RSPBv283i1843_0831043321_zip_rspb_283_issue_1843_rspb_2016_1429_rspb_2016_1429
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20161130
2016-11-30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-11-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2016
  text: 20161130
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences
PublicationTitleAbbrev Proc. R. Soc. B
PublicationTitleAlternate Proc Biol Sci
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher The Royal Society
Publisher_xml – name: The Royal Society
References e_1_3_6_30_2
e_1_3_6_31_2
e_1_3_6_32_2
e_1_3_6_10_2
Kidwell JF (e_1_3_6_7_2) 1977; 85
e_1_3_6_19_2
e_1_3_6_14_2
e_1_3_6_13_2
e_1_3_6_38_2
e_1_3_6_12_2
e_1_3_6_39_2
e_1_3_6_11_2
e_1_3_6_18_2
e_1_3_6_33_2
Powell J (e_1_3_6_37_2) 1997
e_1_3_6_17_2
e_1_3_6_34_2
e_1_3_6_16_2
e_1_3_6_35_2
e_1_3_6_15_2
e_1_3_6_36_2
e_1_3_6_41_2
e_1_3_6_40_2
e_1_3_6_20_2
e_1_3_6_43_2
e_1_3_6_21_2
e_1_3_6_42_2
e_1_3_6_5_2
e_1_3_6_4_2
e_1_3_6_3_2
e_1_3_6_2_2
e_1_3_6_9_2
e_1_3_6_8_2
e_1_3_6_6_2
e_1_3_6_26_2
e_1_3_6_49_2
e_1_3_6_27_2
e_1_3_6_48_2
e_1_3_6_28_2
e_1_3_6_29_2
e_1_3_6_22_2
e_1_3_6_45_2
e_1_3_6_23_2
e_1_3_6_44_2
e_1_3_6_24_2
e_1_3_6_47_2
e_1_3_6_25_2
e_1_3_6_46_2
References_xml – volume: 85
  start-page: 171
  year: 1977
  ident: e_1_3_6_7_2
  article-title: Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.1.171
– ident: e_1_3_6_35_2
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v012.i05
– ident: e_1_3_6_41_2
  doi: 10.1002/ps.1567
– volume-title: Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: the Drosophila model
  year: 1997
  ident: e_1_3_6_37_2
  doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195076912.001.0001
– ident: e_1_3_6_46_2
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1878
– ident: e_1_3_6_8_2
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002917
– ident: e_1_3_6_40_2
  doi: 10.2307/3544943
– ident: e_1_3_6_28_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.058
– ident: e_1_3_6_29_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01649.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_16_2
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000998
– ident: e_1_3_6_21_2
  doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101444
– ident: e_1_3_6_14_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2007.02.008
– ident: e_1_3_6_43_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00915.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_4_2
  doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_20_2
  doi: 10.1126/science.1100522
– ident: e_1_3_6_34_2
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.616
– ident: e_1_3_6_17_2
  doi: 10.1126/science.1074170
– ident: e_1_3_6_13_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00064-X
– ident: e_1_3_6_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.023
– ident: e_1_3_6_6_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00346.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_44_2
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090518
– ident: e_1_3_6_39_2
  doi: 10.1002/9781118912591
– ident: e_1_3_6_26_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_31_2
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp045
– ident: e_1_3_6_11_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02271.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_10_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.054
– ident: e_1_3_6_30_2
  doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45
– ident: e_1_3_6_47_2
  doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq193
– ident: e_1_3_6_25_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.005
– ident: e_1_3_6_32_2
– ident: e_1_3_6_3_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
– ident: e_1_3_6_18_2
  doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.066597
– ident: e_1_3_6_33_2
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
– ident: e_1_3_6_9_2
  doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0143-3
– ident: e_1_3_6_24_2
  doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0353-y
– ident: e_1_3_6_45_2
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2676
– ident: e_1_3_6_36_2
  doi: 10.1198/000313001317097960
– ident: e_1_3_6_38_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053
– ident: e_1_3_6_15_2
  doi: 10.1002/ps.1986
– ident: e_1_3_6_19_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02263.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_42_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.004
– ident: e_1_3_6_2_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005
– ident: e_1_3_6_12_2
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0321
– ident: e_1_3_6_27_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.06.024
– ident: e_1_3_6_23_2
  doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800562
– ident: e_1_3_6_49_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.023
– ident: e_1_3_6_48_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00056.x
– ident: e_1_3_6_22_2
  doi: 10.1038/srep14529
SSID ssj0009585
Score 2.3260763
Snippet The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict...
The BA allele of the Drosophila cytochrome P450 gene Cyp6g1 confers resistance to a range of insecticides. It is also subject to intralocus sexual conflict...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
royalsociety
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 20161429
SubjectTerms Alleles
Animals
Australia
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System - genetics
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila melanogaster - genetics
Drosophila Proteins - genetics
Female
Fertility
Genetic Fitness
Genetic Pleiotropy
Insecticide Resistance
Insecticide Resistance - genetics
Male
Sex Characteristics
Sexual Conflict
Title Intralocus sexual conflict and insecticide resistance
URI https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2016.1429
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881743
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1843969055
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1868309840
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5136577
Volume 283
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rb9MwELfKEBJfJjZeHQ8FCQlQSUjjR-KPbNo0kIam0Un7ZtV5iAhop6UFbX89d7bjpl2HBl-i1q_IufP57nz-HSGvE8ELsBJ0mMuShkwkLJS8lGFVxZRTQcvCZJ47-iIOT9nnM37W63WjluYzHeVXa--V_A9VoQzoirdk_4GyflAogN9AX3gCheF5Kxp_Mp7ZaT5vBo2BTsYgcnPLw4EqNSjO8rrA3CgNaootiZ06euy3r6YNFrD-BBfMGQ12DQPUXkS6HbNZSK7f362kOYoGB5EP5xn_1DZQeS8a7PviEXpQ7QWbCGtOfA3eg7p0w7hS54sYihYDceFUFCBfmcWkjUorUmH7C_E0sStzE5u9pmWujNGuEEU1lFlHyDUJH0u8tQA2v8a4PBG1DZehtFe2OB94aI_cM4X9FfZX2P8OuZuAlZG0zh6P2WwyuvpJeczP7MPy-5d1mmuGypp42wukZWNJ2dFnRg_IpjNEgo-Wq7ZIr5xsk3uW0pfbZMsJ_SZ465DJ3z0kfMFwgWW4oGW4ABgu6DBcsGC4R-T0YH-0dxi6vBthzkU6C1NZ8LhIpSioyFlWppkWclwkFKGCUh0nmsYVZxpM_aoaS5rruJCC5VkFwl5WjD4mG5PppHxKAqjWnOoMhtMMuoxpiWEHFIzoYZJr3idh--VU7kDpMTfKD7WeUn3yxrc_t3AsN7Z81RJCgcTEY7DxpJzOG4XcJoWMOf9bG5FRGJTFffLEEs-_L8EMDKB490m6RFbfABHbl2sm9TeD3M4xqDRN--R9lwGUEynNjVMp1jc_-Xq8-wuWUo1TUiZnIMIRDtVVfe7GyKgya8zMemXclb87t_62z8j9xep_TjZmF_PyBejmM_3SrKA_ROje8g
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intralocus+sexual+conflict+and+insecticide+resistance&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Royal+Society.+B%2C+Biological+sciences&rft.au=Hawkes%2C+M.+F.&rft.au=Gamble%2C+C.+E.&rft.au=Turner%2C+E.+C.+R.&rft.au=Carey%2C+M.+R.&rft.date=2016-11-30&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft.volume=283&rft.issue=1843&rft.spage=20161429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098%2Frspb.2016.1429&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1098_rspb_2016_1429
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon