Retrospective Analysis of the Effects of Identification Procedures and Cage Changing by Using Data from Automated, Continuous Monitoring

• Published in: Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Vol. 58; no. 2; pp. 126 - 141
• Main Authors: Lim, Maria A, Defensor, Erwin B, Mechanic, Jordan A, Shah, Puja P, Jaime, Evelyn A, Roberts, Clifford R, Hutto, David L, Schaevitz, Laura R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 01.03.2019
• Subjects: Animal Husbandry - methods; Animal Identification Systems; Animals; Automation; Behavior, Animal; Female; Housing, Animal - standards; Husbandry; Laboratory Animal Science; Male; Mice; Retrospective Studies
• DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000056
• ISSN: 1559-6109; 2769-6677

Many variables can influence animal behavior and physiology, potentially affecting scientific study outcomes. Laboratory and husbandry procedures-including handling, cage cleaning, injections, blood collection, and animal identification-may produce a multitude of effects. Previous studies have examined the effects of such procedures by making behavioral and physiologic measurements at specific time points; this approach can be disruptive and limits the frequency or duration of observations. Because these procedures can have both acute and long-term effects, the behavior and physiology of animals should be monitored continuously. We performed a retrospective data analysis on the effects of 2 routine procedures, animal identification and cage changing, on motion and breathing rates of mice continuously monitored in the home cage. Animal identification, specifically tail tattooing and ear tagging, as well as cage changing, produced distinct and reproducible postprocedural changes in spontaneous motion and breathing rate patterns. Behavioral and physiologic changes lasted approximately 2 d after tattooing or ear tagging and 2 to 4 d for cage changing. Furthermore, cage changes showed strain-, sex-, and time-of-day-dependent responses but not age-dependent differences. Finally, by reviewing data from a rodent model of multiple sclerosis as a retrospective case study, we documented that cage changing inadvertently affected experimental outcomes. In summary, we demonstrate how retrospective analysis of data collected continuously can provide high-throughput, meaningful, and longitudinal insights in to how animals respond to routine procedures.