The survival prediction of advanced colorectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy—a study of SEER database

The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgical oncology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 175 - 12
Main Authors Han, Zhuo, Yang, Haicheng, Qiao, Qing, Wu, Tao, He, Xianli, Wang, Nan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 01.07.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1477-7819
1477-7819
DOI10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
AbstractList The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. Methods All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. Results A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. Conclusion A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. Keywords: CRC, SEER database, Neoadjuvant therapy, Survival, LODDS
The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.PURPOSEThe aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.METHODSAll enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.RESULTSA total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.CONCLUSIONA nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
Abstract Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. Methods All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. Results A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. Conclusion A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
ArticleNumber 175
Audience Academic
Author Han, Zhuo
Wu, Tao
Qiao, Qing
Wang, Nan
Yang, Haicheng
He, Xianli
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zhuo
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Zhuo
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Haicheng
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Haicheng
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Qing
  surname: Qiao
  fullname: Qiao, Qing
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Tao
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Tao
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xianli
  surname: He
  fullname: He, Xianli
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nan
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Nan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kt-K1DAUxousuH_0BbyQgiDedG2a5k-vZFlWXVgQdL0OJ-nJTJZOMybpwNz5ED6hT2K6sy4zItKLNCe_78s57XdaHI1-xKJ4SepzQiR_F0nTMVHVTVvVtGWyEk-KE9IKUQlJuqO99-PiNMa7um4oZfRZcUxlx4jo2Emxul1iGaewcRsYynXA3pnk_Fh6W0K_gdFgXxo_-IAmZcLMlVDmHbpNPhrRQ383ZTCVaYkB1ttfP35CGdPUb2eTr1dXX8oeEmiI-Lx4amGI-OJhPSu-fbi6vfxU3Xz-eH15cVMZxkWqiJVguZbIgGuLnBCuNSNdQ3vkTOqeSESmdc1MA8wY1nFLOICgkmRhQ8-K651v7-FOrYNbQdgqD07dF3xYKAjJmQGV5T1KwZBTy1sOHKi2uQltdI2dtJC93u-81pNeYW9wTAGGA9PDk9Et1cJvFCENkU3XZoe3Dw7Bf58wJrVy0eAwQP56U1S0Fq1oBKE0o6936AJyb260PluaGVcXousEr2UrMnX-Dyo_Pa6cySGxLtcPBG_2BEuEIS2jH6b5T8dD8NX-sI9T_glMBpodYIKPMaB9REit5lSqXSpVTqW6T6WaXeVfIuMSzJfnvt3wP-lv9NHoaQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2025_1545082
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_025_01849_0
Cites_doi 10.1056/NEJMoa060829
10.21873/anticanres.13324
10.3390/jcm10112391
10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.005
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001977
10.1186/s12893-022-01710-z
10.1093/bjs/znab342
10.3322/caac.21660
10.3389/fonc.2022.937114
10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160
10.1245/s10434-022-12985-0
10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319511
10.1056/NEJMoa040694
10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051
10.7150/jca.38180
10.3892/ol.2024.14335
10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836
10.1007/s00384-023-04490-x
10.5301/tj.5000560
10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X
10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.002
10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012
10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.010
10.1186/s12957-018-1483-6
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003471
10.1186/s40880-017-0209-4
10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.423
10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6638
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
The Author(s) 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: The Author(s) 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1477-7819
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa
PMC11218294
A799760847
38951795
10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 82072722
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29R
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7X8
PJZUB
PPXIY
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-1f8af6b8e5a6bfe6116bb51923de658bd18ee5bb05c2a5cc596f16aa7381af623
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1477-7819
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:10 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:32:34 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 11:45:48 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:08:46 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:04:43 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:24:06 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:36 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:21:40 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:12 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Neoadjuvant therapy
SEER database
LODDS
CRC
Survival
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c567t-1f8af6b8e5a6bfe6116bb51923de658bd18ee5bb05c2a5cc596f16aa7381af623
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7
PMID 38951795
PQID 3074727133
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11218294
proquest_miscellaneous_3074727133
gale_infotracmisc_A799760847
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A799760847
gale_healthsolutions_A799760847
pubmed_primary_38951795
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle World journal of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References B Huang (3458_CR16) 2017; 103
A Body (3458_CR26) 2021; 20
H Zeng (3458_CR5) 2018; 6
Z Liang (3458_CR17) 2023; 38
S Takaichi (3458_CR20) 2023; 30
X Serra-Aracil (3458_CR27) 2023; 34
A Venugopal (3458_CR4) 2022; 21
JF Bosset (3458_CR10) 2006; 355
B Huang (3458_CR28) 2016; 32
QW Zhang (3458_CR15) 2020; 11
N Petrucciani (3458_CR29) 2019; 39
AB Benson (3458_CR12) 2022; 20
H Sung (3458_CR1) 2021; 71
R Sauer (3458_CR19) 2004; 351
F Petrelli (3458_CR9) 2020; 271
HY Huang (3458_CR2) 2017; 36
S Occhionorelli (3458_CR24) 2018; 16
G Arrichiello (3458_CR14) 2022; 12
Z Zheng (3458_CR23) 2021; 47
R Sauer (3458_CR7) 2012; 30
A Kanani (3458_CR8) 2021; 108
RL Siegel (3458_CR3) 2019; 68
AB Benson (3458_CR13) 2021; 19
T Zhang (3458_CR11) 2024; 27
P De Nardi (3458_CR21) 2022; 14
FZ Wei (3458_CR22) 2020; 26
3458_CR6
T Gan (3458_CR18) 2021; 64
Y Lin (3458_CR25) 2022; 22
References_xml – volume: 355
  start-page: 1114
  year: 2006
  ident: 3458_CR10
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060829
– volume: 39
  start-page: 2113
  year: 2019
  ident: 3458_CR29
  publication-title: Anticancer Res
  doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13324
– ident: 3458_CR6
  doi: 10.3390/jcm10112391
– volume: 20
  start-page: 29
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR26
  publication-title: Clin Colorectal Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.005
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1212
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR18
  publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum
  doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001977
– volume: 22
  start-page: 256
  year: 2022
  ident: 3458_CR25
  publication-title: BMC Surg
  doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01710-z
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1417
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR8
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab342
– volume: 71
  start-page: 209
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR1
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
– volume: 12
  start-page: 937114
  year: 2022
  ident: 3458_CR14
  publication-title: Front Oncol
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937114
– volume: 34
  start-page: 78
  year: 2023
  ident: 3458_CR27
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2458
  year: 2023
  ident: 3458_CR20
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12985-0
– volume: 68
  start-page: 2179
  year: 2019
  ident: 3458_CR3
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319511
– volume: 351
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2004
  ident: 3458_CR19
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1139
  year: 2022
  ident: 3458_CR12
  publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1702
  year: 2020
  ident: 3458_CR15
  publication-title: J Cancer
  doi: 10.7150/jca.38180
– volume: 21
  start-page: 162
  year: 2022
  ident: 3458_CR4
  publication-title: Excli j
– volume: 27
  start-page: 201
  year: 2024
  ident: 3458_CR11
  publication-title: Oncol Lett
  doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14335
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1926
  year: 2012
  ident: 3458_CR7
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836
– volume: 38
  start-page: 192
  year: 2023
  ident: 3458_CR17
  publication-title: Int J Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04490-x
– volume: 103
  start-page: 87
  year: 2017
  ident: 3458_CR16
  publication-title: Tumori
  doi: 10.5301/tj.5000560
– volume: 6
  start-page: e555
  year: 2018
  ident: 3458_CR5
  publication-title: Lancet Glob Health
  doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X
– volume: 32
  start-page: 24
  year: 2016
  ident: 3458_CR28
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.002
– volume: 19
  start-page: 329
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR13
  publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012
– volume: 47
  start-page: 3175
  year: 2021
  ident: 3458_CR23
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.010
– volume: 16
  start-page: 186
  year: 2018
  ident: 3458_CR24
  publication-title: World J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1483-6
– volume: 271
  start-page: 440
  year: 2020
  ident: 3458_CR9
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003471
– volume: 36
  start-page: 41
  year: 2017
  ident: 3458_CR2
  publication-title: Chin J Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0209-4
– volume: 14
  start-page: 423
  year: 2022
  ident: 3458_CR21
  publication-title: World J Gastrointest Oncol
  doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.423
– volume: 26
  start-page: 6638
  year: 2020
  ident: 3458_CR22
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6638
SSID ssj0023353
Score 2.3743525
Snippet The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant...
Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received...
Abstract Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 175
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Care and treatment
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy
CRC
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
LODDS
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality
Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics & numerical data
Neoplasm Staging
Nomograms
Nomography (Mathematics)
Patient outcomes
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
SEER database
SEER Program - statistics & numerical data
Survival
Survival Rate
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hHhAXxKsQKMVISByqqEkcO86xrbaqKpUDUKk3y08Bgmy1j0Nv_RH8Qn4JM06y2gipXHrceBKt5-Hvm8QzBvhAhbJFrGwuLfd5HTAUrYs1FfggoCEgKkevBi4-ybPL-vxKXG0d9UV7wvr2wL3iDqP0ATl1kDzKWhppuI1CNtbZIrQqJmqEmDcmU0OqxbngY4mMkodLRDXR5IhHecFrofJmAkOpW_-_a_IWKE03TG4h0OkTeDxQR3bU_-Wn8CB0z-DhxfBx_Dn8QpOz5RpjH72HXS9ogNTO5pGNn_oZNammRQ4lHF1ZMPwVcMnzrAtz43-sUXDF-rKsmz-3vw1LHWjpIV9ms8-MtpQS9L2Ay9PZ15OzfDhNIXeor1VeRmWitCoII20MsiyltYIIng9IQ6wvVQjC2kK4ygjnRCtjKY1pENPxxorvwk4378IrYKTfaDB4G-fryvm29sgTlMVkMSIDLTMoR-VqN7QapxMvfuqUciipe4NoNIhOBtFNBgebe677Rht3Sh-TzTaS1CQ7XUDX0YPr6P-5TgbvyOK6rzjdhLo-alokaQXidgYfkwQFO07AmaFmAdVAbbMmknsTSQxSNxl-P3qVpiHa2YZWXS81pxMMKnpVkMHL3ss2s0IySR3URAZq4n-TaU9Huu_fUo9wpNGYObb16_tQ1Bt4VKXYoV3Ke7CzWqzDW-RiK7ufwu4vArwy8A
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title The survival prediction of advanced colorectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy—a study of SEER database
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951795
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3074727133
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11218294
https://doaj.org/article/f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3rixMxEB_uAeKXw7erZ40g-EGi-0qy_SBylR6H0EOqheKXkGSTUyntXR_g_ffOZLflFg_xy8JuZheSefxmspkZgNeUKJuG3HJpi5qXHlXRulBSgg8CGgJi5WhrYHQuzybl56mY7sG23VG7gKtbQzvqJzVZzt79vrr-iAr_ISp8Jd-vELOE4og2PC1KUXG1D4eITIoUdVTu_irkRRGrUmalUlwhFG6TaG79RgeoYj3_v632DdjqHqm8gVGn9-CodS7ZSSMN92HPzx_AnVH7-_whzFAo2GqD1gHli10uaYAYwxaBbQ8DMCpjTWYQKRw9WTK882gUazb3C1P_2iDhmjWJW9ecGxZL1NI3vg6HY0ZnTgkbH8HkdPjt0xlv2y1wJ6Ra8yxUJkhbeWGkDV5mmbRWkAdYe_RTbJ1V3gtrU-FyI5wTfRkyaYxC0McX8-IxHMwXc_8UGC11MKjdytVl7up-WaMjUVmMJgO6qFkC2XZttWtrkVNLjJmOMUkldcMPjfzQkR9aJfB2985lU4njn9QDYtmOkqpoxweL5YVulVIHWXuM17wsgiylkaawAZfCOpv6fhVMAi-J4bpJSd3ZAn2i-ujFpQjsCbyJFCSfOAFn2qQGXAaqq9WhPO5Qoha7zvCrrVBpGqKjb8jUzUoX1OIgp72EBJ40QrabFXqbVGJNJFB1xK8z7e7I_OePWEQc_WwMLfvls_-ewXO4m0f9oLPKx3CwXm78C_TI1rYH-2qqenA4GJ5_GffivkYvqh5ex4PvfwBTpzVI
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+survival+prediction+of+advanced+colorectal+cancer+received+neoadjuvant+therapy--a+study+of+SEER+database&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Han%2C+Zhuo&rft.au=Yang%2C+Haicheng&rft.au=Qiao%2C+Qing&rft.au=Wu%2C+Tao&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-024-03458-7&rft.externalDocID=A799760847
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon