The survival prediction of advanced colorectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy—a study of SEER database
The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group i...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of surgical oncology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 175 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
01.07.2024
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1477-7819 1477-7819 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.
All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.
A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.
A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. Methods All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. Results A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. Conclusion A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. Keywords: CRC, SEER database, Neoadjuvant therapy, Survival, LODDS The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.PURPOSEThe aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.METHODSAll enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.RESULTSA total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.CONCLUSIONA nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. Abstract Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model. Methods All enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model. Results A total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients. Conclusion A nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC. |
ArticleNumber | 175 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Han, Zhuo Wu, Tao Qiao, Qing Wang, Nan Yang, Haicheng He, Xianli |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Zhuo surname: Han fullname: Han, Zhuo – sequence: 2 givenname: Haicheng surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Haicheng – sequence: 3 givenname: Qing surname: Qiao fullname: Qiao, Qing – sequence: 4 givenname: Tao surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Tao – sequence: 5 givenname: Xianli surname: He fullname: He, Xianli – sequence: 6 givenname: Nan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Nan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kt-K1DAUxousuH_0BbyQgiDedG2a5k-vZFlWXVgQdL0OJ-nJTJZOMybpwNz5ED6hT2K6sy4zItKLNCe_78s57XdaHI1-xKJ4SepzQiR_F0nTMVHVTVvVtGWyEk-KE9IKUQlJuqO99-PiNMa7um4oZfRZcUxlx4jo2Emxul1iGaewcRsYynXA3pnk_Fh6W0K_gdFgXxo_-IAmZcLMlVDmHbpNPhrRQ383ZTCVaYkB1ttfP35CGdPUb2eTr1dXX8oeEmiI-Lx4amGI-OJhPSu-fbi6vfxU3Xz-eH15cVMZxkWqiJVguZbIgGuLnBCuNSNdQ3vkTOqeSESmdc1MA8wY1nFLOICgkmRhQ8-K651v7-FOrYNbQdgqD07dF3xYKAjJmQGV5T1KwZBTy1sOHKi2uQltdI2dtJC93u-81pNeYW9wTAGGA9PDk9Et1cJvFCENkU3XZoe3Dw7Bf58wJrVy0eAwQP56U1S0Fq1oBKE0o6936AJyb260PluaGVcXousEr2UrMnX-Dyo_Pa6cySGxLtcPBG_2BEuEIS2jH6b5T8dD8NX-sI9T_glMBpodYIKPMaB9REit5lSqXSpVTqW6T6WaXeVfIuMSzJfnvt3wP-lv9NHoaQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2025_1545082 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12672_025_01849_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1056/NEJMoa060829 10.21873/anticanres.13324 10.3390/jcm10112391 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.005 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001977 10.1186/s12893-022-01710-z 10.1093/bjs/znab342 10.3322/caac.21660 10.3389/fonc.2022.937114 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160 10.1245/s10434-022-12985-0 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319511 10.1056/NEJMoa040694 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051 10.7150/jca.38180 10.3892/ol.2024.14335 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836 10.1007/s00384-023-04490-x 10.5301/tj.5000560 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.002 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.010 10.1186/s12957-018-1483-6 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003471 10.1186/s40880-017-0209-4 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.423 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6638 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2024 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1477-7819 |
EndPage | 12 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa PMC11218294 A799760847 38951795 10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 82072722 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29R 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7X8 PJZUB PPXIY 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c567t-1f8af6b8e5a6bfe6116bb51923de658bd18ee5bb05c2a5cc596f16aa7381af623 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1477-7819 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:10 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:32:34 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 11:45:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:08:46 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:04:43 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:24:06 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:21:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:12 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Neoadjuvant therapy SEER database LODDS CRC Survival |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c567t-1f8af6b8e5a6bfe6116bb51923de658bd18ee5bb05c2a5cc596f16aa7381af623 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12957-024-03458-7 |
PMID | 38951795 |
PQID | 3074727133 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11218294 proquest_miscellaneous_3074727133 gale_infotracmisc_A799760847 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A799760847 gale_healthsolutions_A799760847 pubmed_primary_38951795 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12957_024_03458_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2024 text: 2024-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | World journal of surgical oncology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World J Surg Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | B Huang (3458_CR16) 2017; 103 A Body (3458_CR26) 2021; 20 H Zeng (3458_CR5) 2018; 6 Z Liang (3458_CR17) 2023; 38 S Takaichi (3458_CR20) 2023; 30 X Serra-Aracil (3458_CR27) 2023; 34 A Venugopal (3458_CR4) 2022; 21 JF Bosset (3458_CR10) 2006; 355 B Huang (3458_CR28) 2016; 32 QW Zhang (3458_CR15) 2020; 11 N Petrucciani (3458_CR29) 2019; 39 AB Benson (3458_CR12) 2022; 20 H Sung (3458_CR1) 2021; 71 R Sauer (3458_CR19) 2004; 351 F Petrelli (3458_CR9) 2020; 271 HY Huang (3458_CR2) 2017; 36 S Occhionorelli (3458_CR24) 2018; 16 G Arrichiello (3458_CR14) 2022; 12 Z Zheng (3458_CR23) 2021; 47 R Sauer (3458_CR7) 2012; 30 A Kanani (3458_CR8) 2021; 108 RL Siegel (3458_CR3) 2019; 68 AB Benson (3458_CR13) 2021; 19 T Zhang (3458_CR11) 2024; 27 P De Nardi (3458_CR21) 2022; 14 FZ Wei (3458_CR22) 2020; 26 3458_CR6 T Gan (3458_CR18) 2021; 64 Y Lin (3458_CR25) 2022; 22 |
References_xml | – volume: 355 start-page: 1114 year: 2006 ident: 3458_CR10 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060829 – volume: 39 start-page: 2113 year: 2019 ident: 3458_CR29 publication-title: Anticancer Res doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13324 – ident: 3458_CR6 doi: 10.3390/jcm10112391 – volume: 20 start-page: 29 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR26 publication-title: Clin Colorectal Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.12.005 – volume: 64 start-page: 1212 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR18 publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001977 – volume: 22 start-page: 256 year: 2022 ident: 3458_CR25 publication-title: BMC Surg doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01710-z – volume: 108 start-page: 1417 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR8 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab342 – volume: 71 start-page: 209 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 – volume: 12 start-page: 937114 year: 2022 ident: 3458_CR14 publication-title: Front Oncol doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937114 – volume: 34 start-page: 78 year: 2023 ident: 3458_CR27 publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160 – volume: 30 start-page: 2458 year: 2023 ident: 3458_CR20 publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12985-0 – volume: 68 start-page: 2179 year: 2019 ident: 3458_CR3 publication-title: Gut doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319511 – volume: 351 start-page: 1731 year: 2004 ident: 3458_CR19 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694 – volume: 20 start-page: 1139 year: 2022 ident: 3458_CR12 publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0051 – volume: 11 start-page: 1702 year: 2020 ident: 3458_CR15 publication-title: J Cancer doi: 10.7150/jca.38180 – volume: 21 start-page: 162 year: 2022 ident: 3458_CR4 publication-title: Excli j – volume: 27 start-page: 201 year: 2024 ident: 3458_CR11 publication-title: Oncol Lett doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14335 – volume: 30 start-page: 1926 year: 2012 ident: 3458_CR7 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836 – volume: 38 start-page: 192 year: 2023 ident: 3458_CR17 publication-title: Int J Colorectal Dis doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04490-x – volume: 103 start-page: 87 year: 2017 ident: 3458_CR16 publication-title: Tumori doi: 10.5301/tj.5000560 – volume: 6 start-page: e555 year: 2018 ident: 3458_CR5 publication-title: Lancet Glob Health doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X – volume: 32 start-page: 24 year: 2016 ident: 3458_CR28 publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.002 – volume: 19 start-page: 329 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR13 publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012 – volume: 47 start-page: 3175 year: 2021 ident: 3458_CR23 publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.010 – volume: 16 start-page: 186 year: 2018 ident: 3458_CR24 publication-title: World J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1483-6 – volume: 271 start-page: 440 year: 2020 ident: 3458_CR9 publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003471 – volume: 36 start-page: 41 year: 2017 ident: 3458_CR2 publication-title: Chin J Cancer doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0209-4 – volume: 14 start-page: 423 year: 2022 ident: 3458_CR21 publication-title: World J Gastrointest Oncol doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i2.423 – volume: 26 start-page: 6638 year: 2020 ident: 3458_CR22 publication-title: World J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6638 |
SSID | ssj0023353 |
Score | 2.3743525 |
Snippet | The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant... Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received... Abstract Purpose The aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 175 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Care and treatment Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy CRC Female Follow-Up Studies Humans LODDS Lymphatic Metastasis Male Methods Middle Aged Neoadjuvant therapy Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics & numerical data Neoplasm Staging Nomograms Nomography (Mathematics) Patient outcomes Prognosis Retrospective Studies SEER database SEER Program - statistics & numerical data Survival Survival Rate |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hHhAXxKsQKMVISByqqEkcO86xrbaqKpUDUKk3y08Bgmy1j0Nv_RH8Qn4JM06y2gipXHrceBKt5-Hvm8QzBvhAhbJFrGwuLfd5HTAUrYs1FfggoCEgKkevBi4-ybPL-vxKXG0d9UV7wvr2wL3iDqP0ATl1kDzKWhppuI1CNtbZIrQqJmqEmDcmU0OqxbngY4mMkodLRDXR5IhHecFrofJmAkOpW_-_a_IWKE03TG4h0OkTeDxQR3bU_-Wn8CB0z-DhxfBx_Dn8QpOz5RpjH72HXS9ogNTO5pGNn_oZNammRQ4lHF1ZMPwVcMnzrAtz43-sUXDF-rKsmz-3vw1LHWjpIV9ms8-MtpQS9L2Ay9PZ15OzfDhNIXeor1VeRmWitCoII20MsiyltYIIng9IQ6wvVQjC2kK4ygjnRCtjKY1pENPxxorvwk4378IrYKTfaDB4G-fryvm29sgTlMVkMSIDLTMoR-VqN7QapxMvfuqUciipe4NoNIhOBtFNBgebe677Rht3Sh-TzTaS1CQ7XUDX0YPr6P-5TgbvyOK6rzjdhLo-alokaQXidgYfkwQFO07AmaFmAdVAbbMmknsTSQxSNxl-P3qVpiHa2YZWXS81pxMMKnpVkMHL3ss2s0IySR3URAZq4n-TaU9Huu_fUo9wpNGYObb16_tQ1Bt4VKXYoV3Ke7CzWqzDW-RiK7ufwu4vArwy8A priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | The survival prediction of advanced colorectal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy—a study of SEER database |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38951795 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3074727133 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11218294 https://doaj.org/article/f6de875e63f646a6a3bf567bcb0e98fa |
Volume | 22 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3rixMxEB_uAeKXw7erZ40g-EGi-0qy_SBylR6H0EOqheKXkGSTUyntXR_g_ffOZLflFg_xy8JuZheSefxmspkZgNeUKJuG3HJpi5qXHlXRulBSgg8CGgJi5WhrYHQuzybl56mY7sG23VG7gKtbQzvqJzVZzt79vrr-iAr_ISp8Jd-vELOE4og2PC1KUXG1D4eITIoUdVTu_irkRRGrUmalUlwhFG6TaG79RgeoYj3_v632DdjqHqm8gVGn9-CodS7ZSSMN92HPzx_AnVH7-_whzFAo2GqD1gHli10uaYAYwxaBbQ8DMCpjTWYQKRw9WTK882gUazb3C1P_2iDhmjWJW9ecGxZL1NI3vg6HY0ZnTgkbH8HkdPjt0xlv2y1wJ6Ra8yxUJkhbeWGkDV5mmbRWkAdYe_RTbJ1V3gtrU-FyI5wTfRkyaYxC0McX8-IxHMwXc_8UGC11MKjdytVl7up-WaMjUVmMJgO6qFkC2XZttWtrkVNLjJmOMUkldcMPjfzQkR9aJfB2985lU4njn9QDYtmOkqpoxweL5YVulVIHWXuM17wsgiylkaawAZfCOpv6fhVMAi-J4bpJSd3ZAn2i-ujFpQjsCbyJFCSfOAFn2qQGXAaqq9WhPO5Qoha7zvCrrVBpGqKjb8jUzUoX1OIgp72EBJ40QrabFXqbVGJNJFB1xK8z7e7I_OePWEQc_WwMLfvls_-ewXO4m0f9oLPKx3CwXm78C_TI1rYH-2qqenA4GJ5_GffivkYvqh5ex4PvfwBTpzVI |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+survival+prediction+of+advanced+colorectal+cancer+received+neoadjuvant+therapy--a+study+of+SEER+database&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Han%2C+Zhuo&rft.au=Yang%2C+Haicheng&rft.au=Qiao%2C+Qing&rft.au=Wu%2C+Tao&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1477-7819&rft.eissn=1477-7819&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12957-024-03458-7&rft.externalDocID=A799760847 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1477-7819&client=summon |