On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from Event-related Brain Potentials
During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often sponta...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of cognitive neuroscience Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 605 - 616 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA
MIT Press
01.04.2007
MIT Press Journals, The |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g.,
), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. |
---|---|
AbstractList | During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., knock), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures.During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., knock), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., knock), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., knock), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., knock), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. Adapted from the source document During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the meaning of each upcoming word into the unfolding message-level representation. Here we investigate whether communicative gestures that often spontaneously co-occur with speech are processed in a similar fashion and integrated to previous sentence context in the same way as lexical meaning. Event-related potentials were measured while subjects listened to spoken sentences with a critical verb (e.g., ), which was accompanied by an iconic co-speech gesture (i.e., KNOCK). Verbal and/or gestural semantic content matched or mismatched the content of the preceding part of the sentence. Despite the difference in the modality and in the specificity of meaning conveyed by spoken words and gestures, the latency, amplitude, and topographical distribution of both word and gesture mismatches are found to be similar, indicating that the brain integrates both types of information simultaneously. This provides evidence for the claim that neural processing in language comprehension involves the simultaneous incorporation of information coming from a broader domain of cognition than only verbal semantics. The neural evidence for similar integration of information from speech and gesture emphasizes the tight interconnection between speech and co-speech gestures. |
Author | Kita, Sotaro Özyürek, Aslı Willems, Roel M. Hagoort, Peter |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Aslı surname: Özyürek fullname: Özyürek, Aslı organization: 2Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands – sequence: 2 givenname: Roel M. surname: Willems fullname: Willems, Roel M. organization: 1F. C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen – sequence: 3 givenname: Sotaro surname: Kita fullname: Kita, Sotaro organization: 3University of Birmingham, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: Peter surname: Hagoort fullname: Hagoort, Peter organization: 2Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18708187$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17381252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFklFrFDEQx4NU7LX6BXyQRdC3XSfJJpv4VktbC4UKVfAtZJNsm2M3e01yBf305ryTSiltHjIw_P6Tmcz_AO2FOTiE3mJoMObk03I2oSEAXYNl0zYc2Au0wIxCLYQUe2gBJdSSyJ_76CClJQAQxttXaB93VGDCyALdXoZ69MFV5yG766izn0M1D9WVm3TI3pT8MMdpmx_iPFVXK-fMTaWDrc5cyuvoPhco-eubnLbEyZ0LuY5u1NnZ6kvUPlTf5lySXo_pNXo5lODe7OIh-nF68v34a31xeXZ-fHRRG8Z5rgc9WGkt1xqcoRZL4bDtJbG2B0k7aqBnzAA3pjeGgWh1xxwD3HPbgqM9PUQft3VXcb5dl07V5JNx46iDm9dJCca7tnzIs2AHFFPM4FkQS054S2QB3z8Al_M6hjKtIoRCJ4HhAr3bQet-clatop90_KX-7aYAH3aATkaPQ9TB-HTPiQ5EuQpHtpyJc0rRDfcIqI1R1MYoamOU0qJqVTFKEYkHIuPz3y3nsq_xaenpVjr5_wbbgHdY-lZRIOUUEcGlhgKhfvvV44WaRwo98fIfbk7o3w |
CODEN | JCONEO |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2023_2295499 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2008_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2011_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_1357650X_2015_1007057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pragma_2018_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1111_lang_12123 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2009_21053 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2019_1703016 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_20774 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2015_12_019 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2015_1065282 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2014_06_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2020_104772 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2011_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2015_04_018 crossref_primary_10_1080_01690965_2011_573220 crossref_primary_10_1177_0142723707087583 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_0809609106 crossref_primary_10_1126_science_aax0289 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2008_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1075_gest_20028_kan crossref_primary_10_1111_tops_12728 crossref_primary_10_1075_gest_18020_nic crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2024_105413 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10548_014_0392_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10919_009_0073_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2020_104191 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2018_04_004 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_017_0942_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2024_2413314 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2018_08_014 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7687_2009_00850_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_018_1674_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2021_104311 crossref_primary_10_1177_01427237241292808 crossref_primary_10_1177_17456916221141422 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0b013e32833904bb crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2020_146855 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2014_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2023_105327 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0084834 crossref_primary_10_1002_dev_20576 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_022_01774_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_7687_2011_01100_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_00423 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1355_21_2021 crossref_primary_10_1080_01690965_2010_494846 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108730 crossref_primary_10_1515_cogl_2011_017 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10071_013_0626_y crossref_primary_10_1080_14427591_2011_575758 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2016_01938 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2021_0500 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X15002885 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2020_147059 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2013_0296 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01125 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogpsych_2019_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2018_1446543 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2018_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1080_01690960802365567 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0083206 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2009_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2019_104725 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2020_1737719 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2007_2159 crossref_primary_10_1177_0956797615597671 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2008_20085 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0229486 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00963 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1156087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2011_03_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2017_07_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_specom_2013_09_008 crossref_primary_10_3109_02699206_2013_813077 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2012_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1749_818X_2008_00067_x crossref_primary_10_1097_AUD_0000000000000302 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10919_015_0215_7 crossref_primary_10_1109_LRA_2024_3359544 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2007_10_055 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2013_0397 crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_13428 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_22015 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_020_01135_0 crossref_primary_10_1002_brb3_81 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_20753 crossref_primary_10_1177_13621688211044584 crossref_primary_10_1177_1745691610388764 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2012_02_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_01775 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2009_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2021_104979 crossref_primary_10_1590_1678_460x202258944 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2009_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2018_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1093_deafed_env056 crossref_primary_10_1177_2377616116652402 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2008_04_065 crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4986649 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0305000921000404 crossref_primary_10_1017_langcog_2014_25 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0069173 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2010_21462 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pscychresns_2010_08_008 crossref_primary_10_5334_labphon_75 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2017_02_003 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_017_0911_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_634074 crossref_primary_10_1002_aur_1785 crossref_primary_10_1515_cog_2016_0086 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2013_0300 crossref_primary_10_1111_cogs_12868 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_psych_093008_131123 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_00974 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41809_019_00047_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2012_02_014 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_22222 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2018_06_018 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470919_2017_1356744 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_575991 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2009_21303 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2010_21486 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_01348 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2018_01109 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsq050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2011_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01301 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_634967 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2020_2419 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_25166 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2010_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neulet_2011_03_015 crossref_primary_10_1080_1068316X_2016_1174860 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2024_2346924 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2016_12_004 crossref_primary_10_1111_mbe_12047 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2007_19_7_1175 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2013_09_027 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0051207 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_52158_w crossref_primary_10_1177_0956797609357327 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2009_21254 crossref_primary_10_4074_S0013754516004067 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2012_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2010_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2014_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_021_01145_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2022_101100 crossref_primary_10_3917_enf1_164_0419 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2014_959533 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2019_06_008 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_26797 crossref_primary_10_4000_primatologie_1717 crossref_primary_10_5334_gjgl_334 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9280_2008_02103_x crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2010_21498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroscience_2009_01_070 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00688 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0142716418000061 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_20565 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2019_0301 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_00080 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10919_011_0122_5 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_1748_17_2017 crossref_primary_10_5334_gjgl_580 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2012_0101 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_00033 crossref_primary_10_3233_ICA_180585 crossref_primary_10_1080_23273798_2017_1283425 crossref_primary_10_1075_lia_15024_fib crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2021_105730 crossref_primary_10_1080_0163853X_2023_2282895 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2021_104916 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2014_03_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108665 crossref_primary_10_1044_1092_4388_2009_08_0243 crossref_primary_10_1177_0267658315576822 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_22894 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1551_6709_2011_01183_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_learninstruc_2020_101331 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_024_02889_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_02643290801921707 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2021_108061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2019_03_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2009_05_066 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470919_2021_1997800 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandl_2017_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1515_zaa_2020_2016 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_018_1159_8 crossref_primary_10_1093_scan_nsu047 crossref_primary_10_1002_dev_21073 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2017_12_008 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00335-3 10.1038/307161a0 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.615 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.007 10.1017/S0048577299971196 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00356.x 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.89 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.15 10.1075/gest.4.2.02mel 10.1111/1469-8986.00016 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00024-X 10.1126/science.7777863 10.1006/jmla.2001.2826 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.743 10.1080/00207597508247319 10.1162/089892903322370807 10.2307/1132072 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90029-N 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00053-8 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4 10.1111/1467-7687.00056 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00244-6 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00786.x 10.1126/science.1095455 10.1038/264746a0 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_4 10.1006/brcg.1994.1014 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00129-X 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01073-5 10.1162/089892999563724 10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1 10.1126/science.7350657 10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.202 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90914-F |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2007 INIST-CNRS Copyright MIT Press Journals Apr 2007 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright MIT Press Journals Apr 2007 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QR 7TK 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 7T9 |
DOI | 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.605 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Technology Research Database Neurosciences Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology Psychology |
EISSN | 1530-8898 |
EndPage | 616 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1252735711 17381252 18708187 10_1162_jocn_2007_19_4_605 jocn.2007.19.4.605.pdf |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | - 0R 36B 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 6IK AAJGR ABDBF ABDNZ ABIVO ABPTK ABTAH ACGFO ACHQT ACIWK ACPRK AEGXH AEILP AENEX AETEA AFHIN AHMBA AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AVWKF AZFZN BEFXN BFFAM BGNUA BKEBE BPEOZ CAG COF CS3 DC DZ EAP EAS EBC EBD EBO EBS EJD EMB EMK EPL EPS ESX F5P FAC FEDTE FNEHJ HVGLF HZ I-F IAO IEA IGS IHR IOF IPLJI IPY JAVBF MCG MKJ MVM N9A O9- OCL P2P PK0 PQEST PQQKQ RMI RWL RXW S10 SV3 TAE TH9 TN5 TUS UHB UPT WG8 WH7 X XSW YBU YQT ZA5 ZWS ZY4 --- -DZ -~X .DC 0R~ AAYXX ABAZT ABVLG ACUHS CITATION EMOBN HZ~ MINIK P0W .GJ 29K 9M8 ACYGS AI. BKOMP D-I FAS FJW IQODW ITC M43 ROL VH1 X7L ZGI ZXP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM VXZ Z5M 7QR 7TK 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 7T9 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-fafd9dd6aa0ec3d198e1db92ddb09373c0b55c06ccbcc5084a75e501b6d40e3b3 |
ISSN | 0898-929X |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 20:30:56 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:36:45 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:27:10 EDT 2025 Sun Jun 29 15:58:20 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:41:45 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:43 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:47:41 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 17 10:31:15 EDT 2022 Tue Mar 01 17:17:40 EST 2022 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Human Verbal comprehension Information integration Central nervous system Electrophysiology Cognition Encephalon Language Semantics Gesture Insight Speech Event evoked potential |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c566t-fafd9dd6aa0ec3d198e1db92ddb09373c0b55c06ccbcc5084a75e501b6d40e3b3 |
Notes | April, 2007 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1AD0-A |
PMID | 17381252 |
PQID | 223079051 |
PQPubID | 37146 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_17381252 crossref_citationtrail_10_1162_jocn_2007_19_4_605 pascalfrancis_primary_18708187 mit_journals_jocnv19i4_302222_2021_11_08_zip_jocn_2007_19_4_605 proquest_miscellaneous_19626429 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_2007_19_4_605 proquest_journals_223079051 mit_journals_10_1162_jocn_2007_19_4_605 proquest_miscellaneous_70313150 proquest_miscellaneous_85674025 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2007-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2007 text: 2007-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA – name: Cambridge, MA – name: United States – name: Cambridge |
PublicationTitle | Journal of cognitive neuroscience |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cogn Neurosci |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | MIT Press MIT Press Journals, The |
Publisher_xml | – name: MIT Press – name: MIT Press Journals, The |
References | p_27 p_28 p_45 p_24 p_25 p_47 p_26 p_41 p_20 p_42 p_21 p_43 p_22 p_44 p_40 p_16 p_38 p_17 p_39 p_2 p_1 Feyereisen P. (p_8) 1988; 8 p_19 p_34 p_3 p_13 p_35 p_6 p_14 p_36 p_15 p_37 p_7 p_31 p_10 p_32 p_11 p_33 |
References_xml | – ident: p_22 doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00335-3 – ident: p_27 doi: 10.1038/307161a0 – ident: p_17 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 – ident: p_34 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.615 – ident: p_3 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.007 – ident: p_32 doi: 10.1017/S0048577299971196 – ident: p_47 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00356.x – ident: p_11 doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.89 – ident: p_36 doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.15 – ident: p_33 doi: 10.1075/gest.4.2.02mel – ident: p_41 doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00016 – ident: p_6 doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00024-X – ident: p_42 doi: 10.1126/science.7777863 – ident: p_38 doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2826 – ident: p_16 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.013 – ident: p_24 doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 – ident: p_25 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.5.743 – ident: p_14 doi: 10.1080/00207597508247319 – ident: p_15 doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807 – ident: p_21 doi: 10.2307/1132072 – ident: p_1 doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90029-N – ident: p_35 doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00053-8 – ident: p_44 doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00196-4 – ident: p_13 doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00056 – ident: p_10 doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00244-6 – ident: p_40 doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00786.x – ident: p_19 doi: 10.1126/science.1095455 – ident: p_28 doi: 10.1038/264746a0 – volume: 8 start-page: 3 year: 1988 ident: p_8 publication-title: Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive – ident: p_31 doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_4 – ident: p_20 doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1014 – ident: p_45 doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00129-X – ident: p_37 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01073-5 – ident: p_43 doi: 10.1162/089892999563724 – ident: p_2 doi: 10.1515/semi.1999.123.1-2.1 – ident: p_26 doi: 10.1126/science.7350657 – ident: p_7 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.202 – ident: p_39 doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90914-F |
SSID | ssj0002564 |
Score | 2.3637416 |
Snippet | During language comprehension, listeners use the global semantic representation from previous sentence or discourse context to immediately integrate the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref mit |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 605 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Brain Brain research Cognition & reasoning Comprehension Comprehension - physiology Electrophysiology Evoked Potentials - physiology Evoked Responses Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gestures Humans Iconicity Integration Language Language Tests Male Neurosciences Nonverbal Communication Production and perception of spoken language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Semantic Processing Semantics Speech Perception - physiology Visual Perception - physiology |
Title | On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from Event-related Brain Potentials |
URI | https://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.605 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17381252 https://www.proquest.com/docview/223079051 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19626429 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70313150 https://www.proquest.com/docview/85674025 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfY9rIXBBsfZTD8gOChSkkc26l5QR2sbDDWSeukvUWJ46DCmow2RWr_es6xm6TaOj5eoio9x1bu5_Pd5T4QeuUrUNt8RR1OUuJQRmKnS1nqMOVH3KcsUGWd7a-n_OiCfr5kl7VDv8wuKeKOXNyaV_I_XIV7wFedJfsPnK0eCjfgN_AXrsBhuP4VjweZU2qJx7bmg1X-ztUY3tdItm2ukQkn1Hkk59dKSZPL9gmOg9mkzEw_zqbaRJ8amkMdAemUOS6gjB7oFhLts7zQUUXR1XSNMltHITUKZFaYGajFfKYm6seK81S7epT19NRO2S8jo8-e17LxW27b3Z-t-CiCRmiLFWUCxKppmlvLXdHAF20IUe6yxnnMTS7mTVHPdenY77nMTCFKT3RopxrarKt9Ogj7Fycn4fDwcriBtggYFGQTbfUOPh70q1MbVL-y1NhypcsEK07e3pxjRYnZGI8KHVIbTWFXpaYdynp7pdRbhg_Qfcsj3DPoeYjuqWwH7fayqMjHc_walyHA5beVHbRdHYfzXfTTogs30IXzFC_RhRvowho52KALA7qwRdc7vMSWoVjBFi6xhWtsPUIX_cPhhyPHNuhwJFgBhZNGaSKShEeRq6SfeKKrvCQWJEliF9ReX7oxY9LlUsZSgiVAo4Ap5noxT6ir_Nh_jDazPFNPEQ5A-seKcMFil0oViVhy6fOoGyiSpkK2kLd846G01et1E5WrsLRiOQk1l3RT1SD0REhD4FILtasx16Z2y53Ub4CRod3e0zsp369QaopfnhjR0NfuEwLUxIPBodsNF6PrW5-wvwKXenlwfIIKHbTQ3hI_9TxEJ23oenot9LL6F04D_YkvylQ-g0ULDhYOEespdL8KH6zA9RRdxgMK-6GFnhjg1qsLQL8njDz74_x7aLuWA8_RZjGZqRegvRfxvt14vwFUPPDc |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On-line+Integration+of+Semantic+Information+from+Speech+and+Gesture%3A+Insights+from+Event-related+Brain+Potentials&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cognitive+neuroscience&rft.au=Oezyuerek%2C+A&rft.au=Willems%2C+R+M&rft.au=Kita%2C+S&rft.au=Hagoort%2C+P&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162%2Fjocn.2007.19.4.605&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0898-929X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0898-929X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0898-929X&client=summon |