Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 12; no. 2; p. e18
• Main Authors: Van De Belt, Tom H, Engelen, Lucien JLPG, Berben, Sivera AA, Schoonhoven, Lisette
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor 11.06.2010; Gunther Eysenbach; JMIR Publications
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Collaboration; Communication; Community Networks; Community Participation - trends; Data Mining; Databases as Topic - trends; Delivery of Health Care - trends; Empowerment; Grey literature; Health; Health care; Humans; In vitro fertilization; Information Storage and Retrieval; Internet; Internet - trends; Literature reviews; Medical Informatics - methods; Medical Informatics - trends; Medicine; Online Systems - trends; Original Paper; Parkinson's disease; Patient Education as Topic; Patients; PubMed; Recurrent; Search Engine; Search engines; Search strategies; Social networks; Social research; Systematic review; Telemedicine; Terminology as Topic; Topics; User generated content; Web 2.0; Websites
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1350

During the last decade, the Internet has become increasingly popular and is now an important part of our daily life. When new "Web 2.0" technologies are used in health care, the terms "Health 2.0" or "Medicine 2.0" may be used. The objective was to identify unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and recurrent topics within the definitions. A systematic literature review of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL) and gray literature on the Internet using the search engines Google, Bing, and Yahoo was performed to find unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We assessed all literature, extracted unique definitions, and selected recurrent topics by using the constant comparison method. We found a total of 1937 articles, 533 in scientific databases and 1404 in the gray literature. We selected 46 unique definitions for further analysis and identified 7 main topics. Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 are still developing areas. Many articles concerning this subject were found, primarily on the Internet. However, there is still no general consensus regarding the definition of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We hope that this study will contribute to building the concept of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and facilitate discussion and further research.