A feasibility study using motivational interviewing and a smartphone application to promote physical activity (+Stay-Active) for women with gestational diabetes

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 360 - 17
• Main Authors: Smith, Ralph, Gould, Rebecca, Kenworthy, Yvonne, Astbury, Nerys, Smith, Iwan, Birks, Jacqueline, Bateman, Paul, Hirst, Jane E., Jebb, Susan, Michalopoulou, Moscho, Pulsford, Richard, Roman, Cristian, Santos, Mauro, Wango, Nicola, Wire, Amy, Mackillop, Lucy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 14.05.2024; BMC
• Subjects: Accelerometers; Adult; Diabetes, Gestational - psychology; Diabetes, Gestational - therapy; Exercise; Exercise - psychology; Feasibility Studies; Feedback; Female; Gestational diabetes; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Glucose; Goal setting; Health Promotion - methods; Humans; Intervention; Interviews; Lifestyles; Mobile Applications; Motivational Interviewing - methods; Physical activity; Physical fitness; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care - methods; Questionnaires; Smartphone; Smartphone applications; Smartphones; Womens health; United Kingdom > UK; Physical activity; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Smartphone applications
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06508-w
• ISSN: 1471-2393

Physical activity (PA) interventions have an encouraging role in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management. Digital technologies can potentially be used at scale to support PA. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of + Stay-Active: a complex intervention which combines motivational interviewing with a smartphone application to promote PA levels in women with GDM. This non-randomised feasibility study used a mixed methods approach. Participants were recruited from the GDM antenatal clinic at Oxford University Hospitals. Following baseline assessments (visit 1) including self-reported and device determined PA measurements (wrist worn accelerometer), women participated in an online motivational interview, and then downloaded (visit 2) and used the Stay-Active app (Android or iOS). Women had access to Stay-Active until 36 weeks' gestation, when acceptability and PA levels were reassessed (visit 3). The primary outcome measures were recruitment and retention rates, participant engagement, and acceptability and fidelity of the intervention. Secondary outcome measures included PA levels, app usage, blood glucose and perinatal outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed for assessments at study visits. Statistics software package Stata 14 and R were used. Over the recruitment period (46 weeks), 114 of 285 women met inclusion criteria and 67 (58%) enrolled in the study. Mean recruitment rate of 1.5 participants/clinic with 2.5 women/clinic meeting inclusion criteria. Fifty-six (83%) received the intervention at visit 2 and 53 (79%) completed the study. Compliance to accelerometer measurement protocols were sufficient in 78% of participants (52/67); wearing the device for more than 10 h on 5 or more days at baseline and 61% (41/67) at 36 weeks. There was high engagement with Stay-Active; 82% (55/67) of participants set goals on Stay-Active. Sustained engagement was evident, participants regularly accessed and logged multiples activities on Stay-Active. The intervention was deemed acceptable; 85% of women rated their care was satisfactory or above, supported by written feedback. This combined intervention was feasible and accepted. Recruitment rates were lower than expected. However, retention rates remained satisfactory and participant compliance with PA measurements and engagement was a high. Future work will explore the intervention's efficacy to increase PA and impact on clinical outcomes. The study has received a favourable opinion from South Central-Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee; REC reference: 20/SC/0342. ISRCTN11366562.