A simple prognostic index based on admission vital signs data among patients with sepsis in a resource-limited setting

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 86
• Main Authors: Asiimwe, Stephen B, Abdallah, Amir, Ssekitoleko, Richard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 16.03.2015; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Adult; Complications and side effects; Critical care; Critical Illness - mortality; Diagnosis; Female; Health aspects; Health Resources; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Infection; Intensive care; Low income groups; Male; Measurement; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods; Mortality; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Risk factors; Sepsis; Sepsis - mortality; Sub-Saharan Africa; Uganda; Vital signs; Vital Signs - physiology; Uganda; Sub-Saharan Africa
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0826-8
• ISSN: 1364-8535

In sub-Saharan Africa, vital signs are a feasible option for monitoring critically ill patients. We assessed how admission vital signs data predict in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis. In particular, we assessed whether vital signs data can be incorporated into a prognostic index with reduced segmentation in the values of included variables. Subjects were patients with sepsis hospitalized in Uganda, who participated in two cohort studies. Using restricted cubic splines of admission vital signs data, we predicted probability of in-hospital death in the development cohort and used this information to construct a simple prognostic index. We assessed the performance of the index in a validation cohort and compared its performance to that of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). We included 317 patients (167 in the development cohort and 150 in the validation cohort). Based on how vital signs predicted mortality, we created a prognostic index giving a score of 1 for: respiratory rates ≥30 cycles/minute; pulse rates ≥100 beats/minute; mean arterial pressures ≥110/<70 mmHg; temperatures ≥38.6/<35.6°C; and presence of altered mental state defined as Glasgow coma score ≤14; 0 for all other values. The proposed index (maximum score = 5) predicted mortality comparably to MEWS. Patients scoring ≥3 on the index were 3.4-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 7.3, P = 0.001) and 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7, P = 0.031) as likely to die in hospital as those scoring 0 to 2 in the development and validation cohorts respectively; those scoring ≥5 on MEWS were 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.2 to 5.3, P = 0.017) and 1.8-fold (95% CI 0.74 to 4.2, P = 0.204) as likely to die as those scoring 0 to 4 in the development and validation cohorts respectively. Among patients with sepsis, a prognostic index incorporating admission vital signs data with reduced segmentation in the values of included variables adequately predicted mortality. Such an index may be more easily implemented when triaging acutely-ill patients. Future studies using a similar approach may develop indexes that can be used to monitor treatment among acutely-ill patients, especially in resource-limited settings.