Postoperative Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 86; no. 4; pp. 671 - 677
Main Authors Chen, Junqiang, Pan, Jianji, Liu, Jian, Li, Jiancheng, Zhu, Kunshou, Zheng, Xiongwei, Chen, Mingqiang, Chen, Ming, Liao, Zhongxing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.07.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
AbstractList To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.PURPOSETo retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.RESULTSThe 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.CONCLUSIONSOur results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m{sup 2}, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m{sup 2}, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m super(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m super(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.
Author Zhu, Kunshou
Chen, Ming
Li, Jiancheng
Pan, Jianji
Liu, Jian
Zheng, Xiongwei
Chen, Junqiang
Liao, Zhongxing
Chen, Mingqiang
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Junqiang
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Junqiang
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jianji
  surname: Pan
  fullname: Pan, Jianji
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jian
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Jian
  email: liujianfj@yahoo.com.cn
  organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jiancheng
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Jiancheng
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kunshou
  surname: Zhu
  fullname: Zhu, Kunshou
  organization: Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xiongwei
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Xiongwei
  organization: Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mingqiang
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Mingqiang
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Ming
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Ming
  organization: School of Graduate, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Zhongxing
  surname: Liao
  fullname: Liao, Zhongxing
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224526$$D View this record in Osti.gov
BookMark eNqVkt-K1DAUxoOsuLOrbyBS8MabjvnTpo3IggzrKiwq7ojehTQ9tRnbpJu0C_MAvvemM6MXgoyGQA7hd76cnPOdoRPrLCD0lOAlwYS_3CzNxrtqWFJM2BLHTfkDtCBlIVKW599O0AIzjlMW4VN0FsIGY0xIkT1Cp5QVBWMCL9DPTy6MbgCvRnMHyWdVmxg5m6zbeDdsk69mbBPnd6ebxmTlrJ68BxvDFno3HrgmMh9cDWkUNDutdeu80kYnl8ENrfoOqktubifVuykkK-i6ZKW8Ntb16jF62KguwJPDeY6-vL1cr96l1x-v3q_eXKc659mYNnlV8bJgWuAGawyKk0ywolSYllX8d8mxzongrKqaSpcCqKi1YBlrqOCaATtHz_e68dNGBm1G0K121oIeJY0ryymP1Is9NXh3O0EYZW-CjgUrC7F2SXKOCc2yf0EzQXmOyzw_jjIuClIKUUb02QGdqh5qOXjTK7-Vv8YWgWwPaO9C8ND8RgiWszvkRu7dIWd3SBz3rtpXf6TFDuzGPXplumPJF_tkiAO6M-Dn_oHVUBs_t6925n8FdGes0ar7AVsIGzd5G4cviQxUYnkzu3c2L2EYM1ZkUeD13wWOv38P2GABSg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10046_6
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_024_02528_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0185424
crossref_primary_10_1002_onco_13914
crossref_primary_10_3727_096504017X14889842609577
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001825
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_10904
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_20654_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_020_01557_9
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08140_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10388_013_0405_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2019_06_020
crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_12228
crossref_primary_10_1002_pro6_1192
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_23716
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03727_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_020_6592_2
crossref_primary_10_4103_jcrt_jcrt_157_22
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_5656_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_017_1803_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtcvs_2017_03_038
crossref_primary_10_1159_000375391
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_3409
crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doy043
crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_8548694
crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S286074
crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2016_142
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_020_07467_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001410
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44178_023_00054_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_015_2041_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xjon_2024_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000000156
crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S232930
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12032_016_0746_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_017_1734_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_13307
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000014080
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_900443
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02211_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_12355
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037
10.1007/s002689900228
10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C
10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2423::AID-CNCR1277>3.0.CO;2-1
10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046
10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01025-0
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.002
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013
Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013
– notice: Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7U7
C1K
OTOTI
DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
OSTI.GOV
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

Toxicology Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-355X
EndPage 677
ExternalDocumentID 22224526
23773390
10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026
S0360301613003374
1_s2_0_S0360301613003374
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABNEU
ABOCM
ABUDA
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADVLN
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AHHHB
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BELOY
DU5
EBS
EFKBS
EJD
F5P
FDB
GBLVA
HED
HMO
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX3
M41
MO0
O9-
OC~
OO-
RNS
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
UV1
XH2
Z5R
~S-
.55
.GJ
29J
AALRI
AAQXK
ABEFU
ABWVN
ACRPL
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADPAM
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AGRDE
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
EFJIC
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
G-2
HMK
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
NQ-
R2-
RIG
SAE
SEW
UDS
X7M
XPP
ZGI
AAIAV
AGZHU
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYWO
AAYXX
AGQPQ
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7U7
C1K
ABPTK
OTOTI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5bb6873c90f0c0ea6149378a028b879860c51963bbfbc89e29dc9343f296c3e3
ISSN 0360-3016
1879-355X
IngestDate Fri May 19 01:40:26 EDT 2023
Fri Jul 11 05:56:56 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:39:24 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:44:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:57:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:48:43 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:06 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:32:35 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 20:10:04 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-f5bb6873c90f0c0ea6149378a028b879860c51963bbfbc89e29dc9343f296c3e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 23773390
PQID 1369718998
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs osti_scitechconnect_22224526
proquest_miscellaneous_1560124426
proquest_miscellaneous_1492650855
proquest_miscellaneous_1369718998
pubmed_primary_23773390
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0360301613003374
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-07-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-07-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-07-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Chen, Liu, Pan (bib9) 2009; 36
Cox, Stetz, Pajak (bib10) 1995; 31
Xiao, Yang, Miao (bib5) 2005; 62
Rice, Adelstein, Chidel (bib12) 2003; 126
Mei, Yi-dian, Hai-jun (bib1) 2008; 15
Huang, Wang, Zhang (bib7) 1987; 25
Edge, Byrd, Compton (bib8) 2009
Bédard, Inculet, Malthaner (bib11) 2001; 91
Chen, Pan, Zheng (bib6) 2012; 82
Nakagawa, Kanda, Kosugi (bib2) 2004; 198
Cao, Lü, Zhu (bib13) 2010; 32
Chen, Zhu, Pan (bib4) 2010; 90
Bhansali, Fujita, Kakegawa (bib3) 1997; 21
Bhansali (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib3) 1997; 21
Edge (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib8) 2009
Cox (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib10) 1995; 31
Xiao (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib5) 2005; 62
Huang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib7) 1987; 25
Rice (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib12) 2003; 126
Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib6) 2012; 82
Nakagawa (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib2) 2004; 198
Bédard (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib11) 2001; 91
Cao (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib13) 2010; 32
Mei (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib1) 2008; 15
Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib4) 2010; 90
Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib9) 2009; 36
References_xml – volume: 126
  start-page: 1590
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1596
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
– volume: 82
  start-page: 475
  year: 2012
  end-page: 482
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1341
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1346
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 15
  start-page: 54
  year: 2008
  end-page: 56
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics for 5406 cases of esophageal neoplasm
  publication-title: Chin J Cancer Prev Treat
– volume: 90
  start-page: 435
  year: 2010
  end-page: 442
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
– volume: 62
  start-page: 82
  year: 2005
  end-page: 90
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: Report of 549 cases
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
– volume: 25
  start-page: 449
  year: 1987
  end-page: 451
  ident: bib7
  article-title: The long-term results of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer
  publication-title: J Surg
– volume: 91
  start-page: 2423
  year: 2001
  end-page: 2430
  ident: bib11
  article-title: The role of surgery and postoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 198
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  end-page: 211
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
– year: 2009
  ident: bib8
  article-title: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
– volume: 32
  start-page: 452
  year: 2010
  end-page: 455
  ident: bib13
  article-title: A prospective comparison between surgery alone and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squaraous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi
– volume: 36
  start-page: 480
  year: 2009
  end-page: 486
  ident: bib9
  article-title: The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
– volume: 21
  start-page: 275
  year: 1997
  end-page: 281
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 449
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib7
  article-title: The long-term results of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer
  publication-title: J Surg
– volume: 15
  start-page: 54
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib1
  article-title: Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics for 5406 cases of esophageal neoplasm
  publication-title: Chin J Cancer Prev Treat
– volume: 82
  start-page: 475
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib6
  article-title: Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037
– volume: 21
  start-page: 275
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib3
  article-title: Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus
  publication-title: World J Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s002689900228
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1341
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib10
  article-title: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C
– volume: 91
  start-page: 2423
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib11
  article-title: The role of surgery and postoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2423::AID-CNCR1277>3.0.CO;2-1
– volume: 36
  start-page: 480
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib9
  article-title: The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056
– volume: 62
  start-page: 82
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib5
  article-title: Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: Report of 549 cases
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib8
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1590
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib12
  article-title: Benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01025-0
– volume: 32
  start-page: 452
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib13
  article-title: A prospective comparison between surgery alone and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squaraous cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi
– volume: 90
  start-page: 435
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib4
  article-title: Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.002
– volume: 198
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib2
  article-title: Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005
SSID ssj0001174
Score 2.3241942
Snippet To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic...
Purpose To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive...
Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive...
SourceID osti
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 671
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy
CARCINOMAS
Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy - methods
Chemoradiotherapy - mortality
CHEMOTHERAPY
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy
Esophagectomy - methods
ESOPHAGUS
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
LYMPH NODES
Lymphatic Irradiation - methods
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
METASTASES
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
PATHOLOGY
PATIENTS
Postoperative Period
Radiology
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy - mortality
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
TOXICITY
Young Adult
Title Postoperative Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0360301613003374
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0360301613003374
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773390
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1369718998
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492650855
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560124426
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224526
Volume 86
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZCmMvY9_r1g0N9lYcbMuW7cdiMkqzlNKlrG8iUmTqMOw2Hy9733-8P2B3lmwnTdJ2heAES7IV30_S6Xz3O0K-6sjLMqZiJ5KedILQ1c6Y-4mj1CQKNAs4l2iHHJ7y44vg5DK87HT-rngtLReyp35vjSt5jFThHMgVo2T_Q7LNReEE_Ab5whEkDMcHyRgz7ZbX2pJ3nyPNQCXOkaEKgCG_uEKHc_xG_-O0LJTlY0KiABt8ZVw2T8uJds4qFy641ugKoKFyddjHNAcw5yBpyM1yjIaCwxTtfSkmISpKO61PW4f41r64wkoxa_oGXWgCZGQbK2MsLI2CnzZBI8VNbk3aw8Y5-cxYbU-gZJqvF33Pl3XR7YL6PMB07YLW5oH5JyLHRH02sV6wergmSrOexy2ldr5qpKgmZW6SvNj1nZu0MRtLh7FiTHv5dFZKZDL1WEV_629h6u6nA8-Z-z3X-YFdwZ7ga0HGTMahWwzenpj7whUbVZ-QPR82N36X7B0Nzn8OGg3Cs-zh9b-sQz4rv8TN_u1SqboAwnz3zqnSoEYvyHO79aFHBscvSUcXr8jToXXueE3-rMGZNnCmFs4UYUzLGbVwpi2c6SqcKcCZrsGZ1nCmLZxpDWeKcKYNnN-Qi2_9UXrs2Cwhjgp5sHCyUEoeR0wlbuYqV49B4QSdOx6D5izjKIm5q0JcZ6TMpIoT7ScTlbCAZX7CFdPsLekWZaHfExrqwEuUdHXog3KnMin1OIxV7EdZkLF4sk9Y_aCFshT6mMnll6h9JafCiEegeIQLH5_vE6dpdW0oZO6pH9YyFHV4NCzoAoB6T7toWzs9t6N9LnYBcbWlVbyNQv2Aex4gyLAVck4rdM6DZrDpQI8OKP5Sg0_AsoXvIseFBtEKj_EE1OIkie-og2SmITrS3lEHLUqwRcF7vTPobh6yz6KIscT98OgH85E8a6efA9JdzJb6E2xCFvKzHbP_AO2uMpk
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative+Radiation+Therapy+With+or+Without+Concurrent+Chemotherapy+for+Node-Positive+Thoracic+Esophageal+Squamous+Cell+Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=Chen%2C+Junqiang%2C+MD&rft.au=Pan%2C+Jianji%2C+MD&rft.au=Liu%2C+Jian%2C+MD&rft.au=Li%2C+Jiancheng%2C+MD&rft.date=2013-07-15&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2013.03.026&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0360301613003374&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0360301613003374
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03603016%2FS0360301613X00082%2Fcov150h.gif