Postoperative Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 86; no. 4; pp. 671 - 677 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
15.07.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.
We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.
The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.
Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.
We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.
The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.
Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.PURPOSETo retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions.We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone.The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.RESULTSThe 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups.Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT.CONCLUSIONSOur results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m{sup 2}, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m{sup 2}, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m super(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m super(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m2, average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. Results: The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) and to determine the incidence and severity of toxic reactions. We retrospectively reviewed data from 304 patients who had undergone esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection for TESCC and were determined by postoperative pathology to have lymph node metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis. Of these patients, 164 underwent postoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), average days 1-3, plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), day 1; 21-day cycle) plus RT (50 Gy), and 140 underwent postoperative RT alone. The 5-year overall survival rates for the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P=.030). The distant metastasis rate, the mixed (regional lymph node and distant) metastasis rate, and the overall recurrence rate were significantly lower in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). However, mild and severe early toxic reactions, including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal reaction, were significantly more common in the CRT group than in the RT group (P<.05). No significant differences in incidence of late toxic reactions were found between the 2 groups. Our results show that in node-positive TESCC patients, postoperative CRT is significantly more effective than RT alone at increasing the overall survival and decreasing the rates of distant metastasis, mixed metastasis, and overall recurrence. Severe early toxic reactions were more common with CRT than with RT alone, but patients could tolerate CRT. |
Author | Zhu, Kunshou Chen, Ming Li, Jiancheng Pan, Jianji Liu, Jian Zheng, Xiongwei Chen, Junqiang Liao, Zhongxing Chen, Mingqiang |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Junqiang surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Junqiang organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Jianji surname: Pan fullname: Pan, Jianji organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Jian surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Jian email: liujianfj@yahoo.com.cn organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Jiancheng surname: Li fullname: Li, Jiancheng organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Kunshou surname: Zhu fullname: Zhu, Kunshou organization: Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Xiongwei surname: Zheng fullname: Zheng, Xiongwei organization: Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Mingqiang surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Mingqiang organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Ming surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Ming organization: School of Graduate, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China – sequence: 9 givenname: Zhongxing surname: Liao fullname: Liao, Zhongxing organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224526$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
BookMark | eNqVkt-K1DAUxoOsuLOrbyBS8MabjvnTpo3IggzrKiwq7ojehTQ9tRnbpJu0C_MAvvemM6MXgoyGQA7hd76cnPOdoRPrLCD0lOAlwYS_3CzNxrtqWFJM2BLHTfkDtCBlIVKW599O0AIzjlMW4VN0FsIGY0xIkT1Cp5QVBWMCL9DPTy6MbgCvRnMHyWdVmxg5m6zbeDdsk69mbBPnd6ebxmTlrJ68BxvDFno3HrgmMh9cDWkUNDutdeu80kYnl8ENrfoOqktubifVuykkK-i6ZKW8Ntb16jF62KguwJPDeY6-vL1cr96l1x-v3q_eXKc659mYNnlV8bJgWuAGawyKk0ywolSYllX8d8mxzongrKqaSpcCqKi1YBlrqOCaATtHz_e68dNGBm1G0K121oIeJY0ryymP1Is9NXh3O0EYZW-CjgUrC7F2SXKOCc2yf0EzQXmOyzw_jjIuClIKUUb02QGdqh5qOXjTK7-Vv8YWgWwPaO9C8ND8RgiWszvkRu7dIWd3SBz3rtpXf6TFDuzGPXplumPJF_tkiAO6M-Dn_oHVUBs_t6925n8FdGes0ar7AVsIGzd5G4cviQxUYnkzu3c2L2EYM1ZkUeD13wWOv38P2GABSg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_021_10046_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_024_02528_0 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0185424 crossref_primary_10_1002_onco_13914 crossref_primary_10_3727_096504017X14889842609577 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001825 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_10904 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_20654_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_020_01557_9 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_08140_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10388_013_0405_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2019_06_020 crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_12228 crossref_primary_10_1002_pro6_1192 crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_23716 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03727_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_020_6592_2 crossref_primary_10_4103_jcrt_jcrt_157_22 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_5656_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_017_1803_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtcvs_2017_03_038 crossref_primary_10_1159_000375391 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_3409 crossref_primary_10_1093_dote_doy043 crossref_primary_10_1155_2016_8548694 crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S286074 crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2016_142 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_020_07467_z crossref_primary_10_1097_SLA_0000000000001410 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44178_023_00054_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_015_2041_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xjon_2024_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0000000000000156 crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S232930 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12032_016_0746_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_017_1734_y crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_13307 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000014080 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_900443 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02211_w crossref_primary_10_1111_1759_7714_12355 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037 10.1007/s002689900228 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2423::AID-CNCR1277>3.0.CO;2-1 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01025-0 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.002 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 – notice: Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7U7 C1K OTOTI |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management OSTI.GOV |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1879-355X |
EndPage | 677 |
ExternalDocumentID | 22224526 23773390 10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026 S0360301613003374 1_s2_0_S0360301613003374 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .FO 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AAQFI AAQQT AAWTL AAXUO ABJNI ABLJU ABNEU ABOCM ABUDA ACGFS ACIUM ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADVLN AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AHHHB AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ BELOY DU5 EBS EFKBS EJD F5P FDB GBLVA HED HMO IHE J1W KOM LX3 M41 MO0 O9- OC~ OO- RNS ROL RPZ SDG SEL SES SSZ UV1 XH2 Z5R ~S- .55 .GJ 29J AALRI AAQXK ABEFU ABWVN ACRPL ADMUD ADNMO ADPAM AFCTW AFFNX AFJKZ AGRDE ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN EFJIC FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-2 HMK HVGLF HX~ HZ~ NQ- R2- RIG SAE SEW UDS X7M XPP ZGI AAIAV AGZHU ALXNB ZA5 AAYWO AAYXX AGQPQ CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7U7 C1K ABPTK OTOTI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-f5bb6873c90f0c0ea6149378a028b879860c51963bbfbc89e29dc9343f296c3e3 |
ISSN | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
IngestDate | Fri May 19 01:40:26 EDT 2023 Fri Jul 11 05:56:56 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:39:24 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 02:44:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:57:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:48:43 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:06 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:32:35 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 20:10:04 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-f5bb6873c90f0c0ea6149378a028b879860c51963bbfbc89e29dc9343f296c3e3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 23773390 |
PQID | 1369718998 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | osti_scitechconnect_22224526 proquest_miscellaneous_1560124426 proquest_miscellaneous_1492650855 proquest_miscellaneous_1369718998 pubmed_primary_23773390 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0360301613003374 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_026 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-07-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-07-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2013 text: 2013-07-15 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Chen, Liu, Pan (bib9) 2009; 36 Cox, Stetz, Pajak (bib10) 1995; 31 Xiao, Yang, Miao (bib5) 2005; 62 Rice, Adelstein, Chidel (bib12) 2003; 126 Mei, Yi-dian, Hai-jun (bib1) 2008; 15 Huang, Wang, Zhang (bib7) 1987; 25 Edge, Byrd, Compton (bib8) 2009 Bédard, Inculet, Malthaner (bib11) 2001; 91 Chen, Pan, Zheng (bib6) 2012; 82 Nakagawa, Kanda, Kosugi (bib2) 2004; 198 Cao, Lü, Zhu (bib13) 2010; 32 Chen, Zhu, Pan (bib4) 2010; 90 Bhansali, Fujita, Kakegawa (bib3) 1997; 21 Bhansali (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib3) 1997; 21 Edge (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib8) 2009 Cox (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib10) 1995; 31 Xiao (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib5) 2005; 62 Huang (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib7) 1987; 25 Rice (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib12) 2003; 126 Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib6) 2012; 82 Nakagawa (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib2) 2004; 198 Bédard (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib11) 2001; 91 Cao (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib13) 2010; 32 Mei (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib1) 2008; 15 Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib4) 2010; 90 Chen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib9) 2009; 36 |
References_xml | – volume: 126 start-page: 1590 year: 2003 end-page: 1596 ident: bib12 article-title: Benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg – volume: 82 start-page: 475 year: 2012 end-page: 482 ident: bib6 article-title: Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 31 start-page: 1341 year: 1995 end-page: 1346 ident: bib10 article-title: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 15 start-page: 54 year: 2008 end-page: 56 ident: bib1 article-title: Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics for 5406 cases of esophageal neoplasm publication-title: Chin J Cancer Prev Treat – volume: 90 start-page: 435 year: 2010 end-page: 442 ident: bib4 article-title: Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg – volume: 62 start-page: 82 year: 2005 end-page: 90 ident: bib5 article-title: Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: Report of 549 cases publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 25 start-page: 449 year: 1987 end-page: 451 ident: bib7 article-title: The long-term results of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer publication-title: J Surg – volume: 91 start-page: 2423 year: 2001 end-page: 2430 ident: bib11 article-title: The role of surgery and postoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma publication-title: Cancer – volume: 198 start-page: 205 year: 2004 end-page: 211 ident: bib2 article-title: Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – year: 2009 ident: bib8 article-title: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual – volume: 32 start-page: 452 year: 2010 end-page: 455 ident: bib13 article-title: A prospective comparison between surgery alone and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squaraous cell carcinoma publication-title: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi – volume: 36 start-page: 480 year: 2009 end-page: 486 ident: bib9 article-title: The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg – volume: 21 start-page: 275 year: 1997 end-page: 281 ident: bib3 article-title: Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus publication-title: World J Surg – volume: 25 start-page: 449 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib7 article-title: The long-term results of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer publication-title: J Surg – volume: 15 start-page: 54 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib1 article-title: Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics for 5406 cases of esophageal neoplasm publication-title: Chin J Cancer Prev Treat – volume: 82 start-page: 475 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib6 article-title: Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037 – volume: 21 start-page: 275 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib3 article-title: Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus publication-title: World J Surg doi: 10.1007/s002689900228 – volume: 31 start-page: 1341 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib10 article-title: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C – volume: 91 start-page: 2423 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib11 article-title: The role of surgery and postoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2423::AID-CNCR1277>3.0.CO;2-1 – volume: 36 start-page: 480 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib9 article-title: The pattern and prevalence of lymphatic spread in thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma publication-title: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.03.056 – volume: 62 start-page: 82 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib5 article-title: Influence of number of metastatic lymph nodes on survival of curative resected thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy: Report of 549 cases publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.046 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib8 – volume: 126 start-page: 1590 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib12 article-title: Benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced esophageal carcinoma publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01025-0 – volume: 32 start-page: 452 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib13 article-title: A prospective comparison between surgery alone and postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squaraous cell carcinoma publication-title: Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi – volume: 90 start-page: 435 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib4 article-title: Postoperative radiotherapy improved survival of poor prognostic squamous cell carcinoma esophagus publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.002 – volume: 198 start-page: 205 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026_bib2 article-title: Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005 |
SSID | ssj0001174 |
Score | 2.3241942 |
Snippet | To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive thoracic... Purpose To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive... Purpose: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy plus RT (CRT) for the postoperative treatment of node-positive... |
SourceID | osti proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 671 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy CARCINOMAS Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects Chemoradiotherapy - methods Chemoradiotherapy - mortality CHEMOTHERAPY Cisplatin - administration & dosage Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy Esophagectomy - methods ESOPHAGUS Female Follow-Up Studies Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Lymph Node Excision LYMPH NODES Lymphatic Irradiation - methods Lymphatic Metastasis Male METASTASES Middle Aged Paclitaxel - administration & dosage PATHOLOGY PATIENTS Postoperative Period Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy - mortality Retrospective Studies Survival Rate TOXICITY Young Adult |
Title | Postoperative Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0360301613003374 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0360301613003374 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.026 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773390 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1369718998 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492650855 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560124426 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224526 |
Volume | 86 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9swEBdZCmMvY9_r1g0N9lYcbMuW7cdiMkqzlNKlrG8iUmTqMOw2Hy9733-8P2B3lmwnTdJ2heAES7IV30_S6Xz3O0K-6sjLMqZiJ5KedILQ1c6Y-4mj1CQKNAs4l2iHHJ7y44vg5DK87HT-rngtLReyp35vjSt5jFThHMgVo2T_Q7LNReEE_Ab5whEkDMcHyRgz7ZbX2pJ3nyPNQCXOkaEKgCG_uEKHc_xG_-O0LJTlY0KiABt8ZVw2T8uJds4qFy641ugKoKFyddjHNAcw5yBpyM1yjIaCwxTtfSkmISpKO61PW4f41r64wkoxa_oGXWgCZGQbK2MsLI2CnzZBI8VNbk3aw8Y5-cxYbU-gZJqvF33Pl3XR7YL6PMB07YLW5oH5JyLHRH02sV6wergmSrOexy2ldr5qpKgmZW6SvNj1nZu0MRtLh7FiTHv5dFZKZDL1WEV_629h6u6nA8-Z-z3X-YFdwZ7ga0HGTMahWwzenpj7whUbVZ-QPR82N36X7B0Nzn8OGg3Cs-zh9b-sQz4rv8TN_u1SqboAwnz3zqnSoEYvyHO79aFHBscvSUcXr8jToXXueE3-rMGZNnCmFs4UYUzLGbVwpi2c6SqcKcCZrsGZ1nCmLZxpDWeKcKYNnN-Qi2_9UXrs2Cwhjgp5sHCyUEoeR0wlbuYqV49B4QSdOx6D5izjKIm5q0JcZ6TMpIoT7ScTlbCAZX7CFdPsLekWZaHfExrqwEuUdHXog3KnMin1OIxV7EdZkLF4sk9Y_aCFshT6mMnll6h9JafCiEegeIQLH5_vE6dpdW0oZO6pH9YyFHV4NCzoAoB6T7toWzs9t6N9LnYBcbWlVbyNQv2Aex4gyLAVck4rdM6DZrDpQI8OKP5Sg0_AsoXvIseFBtEKj_EE1OIkie-og2SmITrS3lEHLUqwRcF7vTPobh6yz6KIscT98OgH85E8a6efA9JdzJb6E2xCFvKzHbP_AO2uMpk |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative+Radiation+Therapy+With+or+Without+Concurrent+Chemotherapy+for+Node-Positive+Thoracic+Esophageal+Squamous+Cell+Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=Chen%2C+Junqiang%2C+MD&rft.au=Pan%2C+Jianji%2C+MD&rft.au=Liu%2C+Jian%2C+MD&rft.au=Li%2C+Jiancheng%2C+MD&rft.date=2013-07-15&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2013.03.026&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0360301613003374&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0360301613003374 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03603016%2FS0360301613X00082%2Fcov150h.gif |