Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term follow-up analysis

To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiation oncology (London, England) Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 63 - 10
Main Authors Xu, An-An, Miao, Jing-Jing, Wang, Lin, Li, An-Chuan, Han, Fei, Shao, Xun-Fan, Mo, Zhi-Wen, Huang, Shao-Min, Yuan, Ya-Wei, Deng, Xiao-Wu, Zhao, Chong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 05.04.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
AbstractList To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
BackgroundTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.ResultsA total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 – 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3–4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).ConclusionsOur classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
Abstract Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Methods Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. Results A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 – 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3–4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Conclusions Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Methods Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. Results A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Conclusions Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Concurrent chemotherapy, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Prognostication, Toxicity
To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.BACKGROUNDTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.METHODSConsecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).RESULTSA total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.CONCLUSIONSOur classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.
ArticleNumber 63
Audience Academic
Author Han, Fei
Li, An-Chuan
Deng, Xiao-Wu
Mo, Zhi-Wen
Zhao, Chong
Huang, Shao-Min
Yuan, Ya-Wei
Wang, Lin
Shao, Xun-Fan
Miao, Jing-Jing
Xu, An-An
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: An-An
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, An-An
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jing-Jing
  surname: Miao
  fullname: Miao, Jing-Jing
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lin
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Lin
– sequence: 4
  givenname: An-Chuan
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, An-Chuan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Fei
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Fei
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xun-Fan
  surname: Shao
  fullname: Shao, Xun-Fan
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Zhi-Wen
  surname: Mo
  fullname: Mo, Zhi-Wen
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Shao-Min
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Shao-Min
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ya-Wei
  surname: Yuan
  fullname: Yuan, Ya-Wei
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Xiao-Wu
  surname: Deng
  fullname: Deng, Xiao-Wu
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Chong
  surname: Zhao
  fullname: Zhao, Chong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Ustu1DAUjVARfcAPsECR2LBJ8WvshA2qqgKVKrEBiZ11YzsZV449OEmrbPly7nRK6VQIWZat63POffgcFwcxRVcUryk5pbSW70fKCRUVYRw3E6panhVHVIm6UlT9OHh0PyyOx_GaELHipHlRHHJFGOGUHRW_LrrOGzBLmbrSpGjmnF2cSrN2Q8pgfZrWLsNmKSFg9rJLuQzJpCq73qcIIeCLvYFonC0jjGmzhrzE3kEoDWTjYxrgA1JiX00uDygQQrqt5k0JyF5GP74snncQRvfq_jwpvn-6-Hb-pbr6-vny_OyqMisppqqlhMuurVkrGZMOasIbKqziDTbfEmpaoxjnHeO17FjbUEWtY6RuCYfGWspPisudrk1wrTfZD1ipTuD1XSDlXkOevAlOEwKOt4rIpq1FbdvaGApEGq4wJqlFrY87rc3cDs4aHFmGsCe6_xL9WvfpRlNClJAriQrv7hVy-jm7cdKDH40LAaJL86iZahQVYlVvC3_7BHqd5ozTQxROAatcUfkX1QN24GOXMLHZiuozJQQmbThB1Ok_ULisGzz-v-s8xvcIbx53-tDiHwshgO0AJqdxzK57gFCitz7VO59q9Km-86lekFQ_IRk_wYSOwnJ8-B_1Nzkt7Vc
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2024_110200
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_025_06145_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_024_03781_1
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.039
10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149
10.1056/NEJMoa1905287
10.5732/cjc.010.10547
10.1200/JCO.20.03237
10.2147/CMAR.S179139
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.009
10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104478
10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0388
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
10.1186/s13014-014-0268-5
10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.022
10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9
10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6005
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.029
10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5
10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.023
10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70126-9
10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C
10.2147/OTT.S133917
10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4119
10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01123-5
10.1002/ijc.32099
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007
10.1200/JCO.2004.00.3863
10.1186/1748-717X-9-56
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.018
10.1002/cncr.25754
10.18632/oncotarget.8828
10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.110
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.3675
10.1093/annonc/mdy249
10.3322/caac.21388
10.3322/caac.21609
10.1002/cncr.30198
10.3389/fonc.2019.01343
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13014-023-02247-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Publicly Available Content Database


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1748-717X
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d
PMC10074656
A744465930
37020312
10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 82203966
– fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  grantid: 81872469
– fundername: Guangdong Provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Fund
  grantid: A2022355
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 82203966; 81872469
– fundername: ;
  grantid: A2022355
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
123
29P
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
K9.
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-b1036fb82b6226ea803914d739022b01cbc7233f2386f2b9171de208b03a9dd13
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1748-717X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:26:06 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:38:26 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 07:41:59 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:19:35 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:42:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:23:31 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:53:48 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:39:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:07 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Prognostication
Toxicity
Concurrent chemotherapy
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-b1036fb82b6226ea803914d739022b01cbc7233f2386f2b9171de208b03a9dd13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2803069516?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 37020312
PQID 2803069516
PQPubID 55355
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10074656
proquest_miscellaneous_2797144581
proquest_journals_2803069516
gale_infotracmisc_A744465930
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A744465930
pubmed_primary_37020312
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-04-05
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-04-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-04-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Radiation oncology (London, England)
PublicationTitleAlternate Radiat Oncol
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 2247_CR39
W Xia (2247_CR10) 2019; 11
Y Chen (2247_CR8) 2021; 39
WF Li (2247_CR14) 2019; 145
2247_CR1
Z Yang (2247_CR19) 2015; 10
2247_CR3
SS Guo (2247_CR32) 2016; 7
W Xiao (2247_CR20) 2015; 51
Y Sun (2247_CR13) 2016; 17
Y Chen (2247_CR2) 2019; 394
K Kim (2247_CR22) 2017; 98
L Zhang (2247_CR6) 2005; 23
Y Zhang (2247_CR9) 2019; 381
2247_CR11
JD Cox (2247_CR31) 1995; 31
2247_CR33
C Xu (2247_CR16) 2019; 9
S Bentzen (2247_CR29) 2010; 76
2247_CR35
2247_CR12
J Yi (2247_CR7) 2014; 9
2247_CR27
SF Su (2247_CR24) 2011; 30
RL Hong (2247_CR34) 2018; 29
B Ma (2247_CR37) 2018; 36
AW Lee (2247_CR23) 2011; 98
L Ribassin-Majed (2247_CR17) 2017; 35
F Xue (2247_CR18) 2020; 100
C Hsu (2247_CR38) 2017; 35
J Miao (2247_CR30) 2020; 107
WW Xiao (2247_CR28) 2011; 117
P Blanchard (2247_CR4) 2015; 16
X Lan (2247_CR15) 2017; 10
W Fang (2247_CR36) 2018; 19
A Chan (2247_CR5) 2002; 20
2247_CR21
L Chen (2247_CR25) 2012; 13
2247_CR26
References_xml – ident: 2247_CR11
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.039
– volume: 20
  start-page: 2038
  issue: 8
  year: 2002
  ident: 2247_CR5
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149
– volume: 381
  start-page: 1124
  issue: 12
  year: 2019
  ident: 2247_CR9
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905287
– volume: 30
  start-page: 565
  issue: 8
  year: 2011
  ident: 2247_CR24
  publication-title: Chin J Cancer
  doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10547
– volume: 39
  start-page: 840
  issue: 7
  year: 2021
  ident: 2247_CR8
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03237
– volume: 11
  start-page: 9813
  year: 2019
  ident: 2247_CR10
  publication-title: Cancer Manag Res
  doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S179139
– volume: 51
  start-page: 363
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 2247_CR20
  publication-title: Oral Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.009
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1509
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 2247_CR13
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7
– volume: 100
  start-page: 104478
  year: 2020
  ident: 2247_CR18
  publication-title: Oral Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104478
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1412
  issue: 14
  year: 2018
  ident: 2247_CR37
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0388
– volume: 394
  start-page: 64
  issue: 10192
  year: 2019
  ident: 2247_CR2
  publication-title: Lancet (London, England)
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0
– volume: 76
  start-page: S3
  year: 2010
  ident: 2247_CR29
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
– volume: 10
  start-page: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 2247_CR19
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0268-5
– ident: 2247_CR21
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.022
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1338
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  ident: 2247_CR36
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9
– ident: 2247_CR35
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6005
– volume: 107
  start-page: 672
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 2247_CR30
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.029
– volume: 13
  start-page: 163
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 2247_CR25
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5
– volume: 98
  start-page: 15
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 2247_CR23
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.023
– volume: 16
  start-page: 645
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 2247_CR4
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70126-9
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1341
  issue: 5
  year: 1995
  ident: 2247_CR31
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C
– ident: 2247_CR39
– volume: 10
  start-page: 3853
  year: 2017
  ident: 2247_CR15
  publication-title: Onco Targets Ther
  doi: 10.2147/OTT.S133917
– volume: 35
  start-page: 498
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 2247_CR17
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4119
– ident: 2247_CR26
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01123-5
– volume: 145
  start-page: 295
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 2247_CR14
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.32099
– ident: 2247_CR12
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007
– volume: 23
  start-page: 8461
  issue: 33
  year: 2005
  ident: 2247_CR6
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.3863
– volume: 9
  start-page: 56
  year: 2014
  ident: 2247_CR7
  publication-title: Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-56
– volume: 98
  start-page: 996
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 2247_CR22
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.018
– volume: 117
  start-page: 1874
  issue: 9
  year: 2011
  ident: 2247_CR28
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25754
– volume: 7
  start-page: 29739
  issue: 20
  year: 2016
  ident: 2247_CR32
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8828
– ident: 2247_CR33
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.110
– volume: 35
  start-page: 4050
  issue: 36
  year: 2017
  ident: 2247_CR38
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.3675
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1972
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 2247_CR34
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy249
– ident: 2247_CR27
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21388
– ident: 2247_CR1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21609
– ident: 2247_CR3
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.30198
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1343
  year: 2019
  ident: 2247_CR16
  publication-title: Front Oncol
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01343
SSID ssj0045309
Score 2.3546963
Snippet To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma...
Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal...
BackgroundTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal...
Abstract Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 63
SubjectTerms Biopsy
Brain damage
Cancer
Care and treatment
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy - methods
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Clinical trials
Concurrent chemotherapy
Deafness
Death
Diagnosis
Distribution
Failure
Follow-Up Studies
Health hazards
Heterogeneity
Humans
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical prognosis
Metastasis
Methods
Mortality
Nasopharyngeal cancer
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma - radiotherapy
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Neck
Otitis
Patient outcomes
Patients
Peripheral neuropathy
Prognosis
Prognostication
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Rank tests
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Risk groups
Soft tissues
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
Statistical tests
Subgroups
Survival
Temporal lobe
Throat cancer
Tomography
Toxicity
Tumor staging
Xerostomia
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JL6btu06JCoYciYj0sS72lJSEU0lMDuQmNbKcBxw7JLsXX_PLM2N5lTaG99GpJtqR5fDNY-oaxj5V3ttBGCRulEQYhUkCjktDaggetXFPSfefTH_bkzHw_L853Sn3RmbCJHnjauIM8j7WGMrcenHEVuJRkzG3SJT6zsiLvi5i3SaYmH2wKnfvNFRlnD24lZQ4C8UkQZpViWMDQyNb_p0_eAaXlgckdBDp-wh7PoSM_nKb8lD2ou2fs4en8c_w5uzsiOoiYBt43HNPcNFEvcRTLFQq6upwvWw08tn1XcwxXOUJZL6g4AwXkLbbMRwJ4F6m-QbwZugsMJXmikkNdfxW_4JDuQpBDxxe0bf9brK95nKlNXrCz46Of307EXGJBpMKalQCJCNaAU2AxDqujI8J4U5Xa4z5BLhOkUmndILDbRgHmdrKqVe4g19FXldQv2V6HU37NeAXQNGANQO1Nij56FbXC3LtwGlxTZ0xudjykmX-cymC0YcxDnA2TlAJKKYxSCkPGPm_HXE_sG3_t_ZUEue1JzNnjA9SnMOtT-Jc-ZewTqUEg-8bpodSmawq4SGLKCoelIY45r_OM7S96ol2mZfNGkcLsF24D1QLDTxfSZuzDtplG0lm3ru7X2Kf0Jaa5hZMZezXp3XZJuqQ_x1JlzC00crHmZUt3-WtkDZdjaZnCvvkfu_SWPVKjNaFRFftsb3Wzrt9hdLaC96Mh3gNC7Tdj
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1bi9UwEA7rCuKLeLe6SgTBB4k2TZqLILLKLotwfPLAvoUkbY8L3XY9ew7aV3-5M70ctrjsay5tkpnJN0OSbwh5U1ijciEzpjyXTAJEslBlkQmhgg0iM5XG986L7-pkKb-d5qd7ZEp3NC7g5bWhHeaTWq7r939-dZ_B4D_1Bm_Uh0uOcQED9GGISJp1t8htQCaNhrqQu1MFmYvUTg9nru03A6eew___nfoKVM2vUV7BpeP75N7oUNLDQQMekL2yeUjuLMYj80fk7xGSRPjY0baiEPzGgZCJgrDOQfzF2fgEq6O-bpuSghNLAeBahikb0E2voWa8KEAbj1kP_LprVuBg0oiJiJr23H-ELs2K4TYPH6jr9jfbXlA_Ep48Jsvjox9fT9iYeIHFXMkNCxxwrQomCwq8s9IbpJGXhRYW1imkPIaoMyEqgHtVZQEiPl6UWWpCKrwtCi6ekP0GhvyM0CKEqgpKhlBaGb31NvMig4g8NyKYqkwIn1bcxZGVHJNj1K6PToxyg5QcSMn1UnJdQt7t-lwMnBw3tv6Cgty1RD7tvqBdr9xoni5NfSmCTpUNRpoimBi5T1UUGsoULxLyFtXAoR7C8EBqw-MFmCTyZ7lDLZF5zoo0IQezlmCtcV49KZKblN1hhjD4dc5VQl7vqrEn3oBrynYLbbTVEPzmhifk6aB3uykJjefJPEuImWnkbM7zmubsZ88lzvuEM7l6fvO4XpC7WW8nYC75AdnfrLflS_DGNuFVb2L_AJyYMqA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term follow-up analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020312
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2803069516
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2797144581
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10074656
https://doaj.org/article/00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9QwFA-6C-JF_La6DhEEDxK2adI09SKzMssyMIuoC3MLSdqOC912nA9krv7lvtdmxi3CXqbQJEPS9528_B4h74tcq1TIhCnLJZNgIpmrEs-EUC53ItFVhvedZ5fq4kpO5-k8bLitQ1rlXid2irpoPe6Rn2IVpViBP6A-L38xrBqFp6uhhMZ9cozQZZjSlc0PAZdMRZzvL8podbrmGD8wsFIMLVfGdgNj1GH2_6-Zb5mmYdrkLTt0_pg8Cg4kHfcUf0Lulc1T8mAWjsifkT8TBIWwfkfbikKw63sAJgrEuQFyF9fhytWO2rptSgpOKwWD1jIs0YBueQ0tITGANharHNjVrlmAQ0k9Fh5q2hv7CYY0C4ZqHf6grtvfbLukNgCcPCdX55MfXy5YKLTAfKrkhjkOdqxyOnEKvLHSaoSNl0UmcvhOLube-SwRogLzrqrEQYTHizKJtYuFzYuCixfkqIEpvyK0cK6qnJLOlbn0Nrd5YkUCEXiqhdNVGRG-_-LGBxRyLIZRmy4a0cr0VDJAJdNRyewi8vEwZtljcNzZ-wwJeeiJ-Nndi3a1MEEcTRzbUrgMGMppqQunvec2Vl5k8E7xIiIfkA0MSjlMD6jWX1aARSJelhlnEpHmchFH5GTQE6TTD5v3jGSCdlibf7wckXeHZhyJGW9N2W6hT5ZnEOymmkfkZc93hyWJDM-PeRIRPeDIwZqHLc31zw47nHcFZlL1-u55vSEPk05OQFzSE3K0WW3Lt-B9bdyoE7EROR6Pp9-n8DybXH79Nur2MuB3JvVfyo80Mw
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZGJwEviDuBAUYC8YCsJXbiOEgIbdCpY2uF0CbtzbOdpEzqktK1mvLKD-I3ck4uZRHS3vYa25Gdc4_t7yPkbZooGYmQM2mCkIUQIpnNuWNCSJtYwVUe433n8USOjsNvJ9HJBvnT3YXBY5WdT6wddVo6_Ee-jSxKvoR8QH6e_2LIGoW7qx2FRqMWB1l1CSXbxaf9ryDfd5zvDY--jFjLKsBcJMMlswE47dwqbiWkHplRiJEepjEU_5xbP3DWxVyIHGKZzLmFciZIM-4r6wuTpGkg4L23yGYooJQZkM3d4eT7j873h5Hwk-5qjpLbFwFWLAziIsNYGbOqF_5qloD_Y8GVYNg_qHkl8u3dJ_falJXuNDr2gGxkxUNye9xuyj8iv4cIQ2FcRcucQnntGsgnCupwDgqWnrWXvCpqZmWRUUiTKYTQkiEpBBYCM2hpjyLQwiCvgllUxRRSWOqQ6qgoz81HGFJMGQYSeMFsVl6y1ZyaFlLlMTm-ESE8IYMCpvyM0NTaPLcytDZLQmcSk3AjONT8kRJW5ZlHgu6La9finiP9xkzX9Y-SupGSBinpWkq68siH9Zh5g_pxbe9dFOS6JyJ21w_KxVS3DkD7vsmEjUGFrQpVapVzgfGlEzE8k0HqkfeoBhr9CkwPpNZcj4BFIkKX3olDxLZLhO-RrV5P8Aeu39wpkm790YX-Zz0eebNuxpF4xq7IyhX0iZMYyutIBR552ujdekkixh3rgHtE9TSyt-Z-S3H2s0YrD2pKm0g-v35er8md0dH4UB_uTw5ekLu8thkwnWiLDJaLVfYScr-lfdUaHCWnN23jfwHE92uH
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+of+concurrent+chemoradiotherapy+alone+for+loco-regionally+advanced+nasopharyngeal+carcinoma%3A+long-term+follow-up+analysis&rft.jtitle=Radiation+oncology+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=An-An%2C+Xu&rft.au=Jing-Jing+Miao&rft.au=Wang%2C+Lin&rft.au=An-Chuan%2C+Li&rft.date=2023-04-05&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13014-023-02247-y
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon