Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term follow-up analysis
To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC pat...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiation oncology (London, England) Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 63 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
05.04.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.
Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.
A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).
Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. BackgroundTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.ResultsA total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 – 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3–4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).ConclusionsOur classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. Abstract Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Methods Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. Results A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 – 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3–4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Conclusions Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Methods Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. Results A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Conclusions Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Concurrent chemotherapy, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Prognostication, Toxicity To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients. Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%). Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.BACKGROUNDTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC), so as to provide evidence for individualized treatment strategy and designing appropriate clinical trial for different risk LANPC patients.Consecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.METHODSConsecutive patients with stage III-IVa (AJCC/UICC 8th) were enrolled in this study. All patients received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CDDP). The hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk in patients with T3N0 was used as baseline, relative HRs were calculated by a Cox proportional hazard model to classify different death risk patients. Survival curves for the time-to-event endpoints were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were conducted at a two-sided level of significance of 0.05.A total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).RESULTSA total of 456 eligible patients were included. With 12-year median follow-up, 10-year overall survival (OS) was 76%. 10-year loco-regionally failure-free survival (LR-FFS), distant failure-free survival (D-FFS) and failure-free survival (FFS) were 72%, 73% and 70%, respectively. Based on the relative hazard ratios (HRs) of death risk, LANPC patients were classified into 3 subgroups, low-risk group (T1-2N2 and T3N0-1) contained 244 patients with HR < 2; medium-risk group (T3N2 and T4N0-1) contained 140 patients with HR of 2 - 5; high-risk group (T4N2 and T1-4N3) contained 72 patients with HR > 5. The 10-year OS for patients in low-, medium-, and high-risk group were 86%, 71% and 52%, respectively. Significantly differences of OS rates were found between each of the two groups (low-risk group vs. medium-risk group, P < 0.001; low-risk group vs. high-risk group, P < 0.001; and medium-risk group vs. high-risk group, P = 0.002, respectively). Grade 3-4 late toxicities included deafness/otitis (9%), xerostomia (4%), temporal lobe injury (5%), cranial neuropathy (4%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), soft tissue damage (2%) and trismus (1%).Our classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials.CONCLUSIONSOur classification criteria demonstrated that significant heterogeneity in death risk among TN substages for LANPC patients. IMRT plus CDDP alone maybe suitable for low-risk LANPC (T1-2N2 or T3N0-1), but not for medium- and high-risk patients. These prognostic groupings provide a practicable anatomic foundation to guide individualized treatment and select optimal targeting in the future clinical trials. |
ArticleNumber | 63 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Han, Fei Li, An-Chuan Deng, Xiao-Wu Mo, Zhi-Wen Zhao, Chong Huang, Shao-Min Yuan, Ya-Wei Wang, Lin Shao, Xun-Fan Miao, Jing-Jing Xu, An-An |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: An-An surname: Xu fullname: Xu, An-An – sequence: 2 givenname: Jing-Jing surname: Miao fullname: Miao, Jing-Jing – sequence: 3 givenname: Lin surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Lin – sequence: 4 givenname: An-Chuan surname: Li fullname: Li, An-Chuan – sequence: 5 givenname: Fei surname: Han fullname: Han, Fei – sequence: 6 givenname: Xun-Fan surname: Shao fullname: Shao, Xun-Fan – sequence: 7 givenname: Zhi-Wen surname: Mo fullname: Mo, Zhi-Wen – sequence: 8 givenname: Shao-Min surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Shao-Min – sequence: 9 givenname: Ya-Wei surname: Yuan fullname: Yuan, Ya-Wei – sequence: 10 givenname: Xiao-Wu surname: Deng fullname: Deng, Xiao-Wu – sequence: 11 givenname: Chong surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Chong |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Ustu1DAUjVARfcAPsECR2LBJ8WvshA2qqgKVKrEBiZ11YzsZV449OEmrbPly7nRK6VQIWZat63POffgcFwcxRVcUryk5pbSW70fKCRUVYRw3E6panhVHVIm6UlT9OHh0PyyOx_GaELHipHlRHHJFGOGUHRW_LrrOGzBLmbrSpGjmnF2cSrN2Q8pgfZrWLsNmKSFg9rJLuQzJpCq73qcIIeCLvYFonC0jjGmzhrzE3kEoDWTjYxrgA1JiX00uDygQQrqt5k0JyF5GP74snncQRvfq_jwpvn-6-Hb-pbr6-vny_OyqMisppqqlhMuurVkrGZMOasIbKqziDTbfEmpaoxjnHeO17FjbUEWtY6RuCYfGWspPisudrk1wrTfZD1ipTuD1XSDlXkOevAlOEwKOt4rIpq1FbdvaGApEGq4wJqlFrY87rc3cDs4aHFmGsCe6_xL9WvfpRlNClJAriQrv7hVy-jm7cdKDH40LAaJL86iZahQVYlVvC3_7BHqd5ozTQxROAatcUfkX1QN24GOXMLHZiuozJQQmbThB1Ok_ULisGzz-v-s8xvcIbx53-tDiHwshgO0AJqdxzK57gFCitz7VO59q9Km-86lekFQ_IRk_wYSOwnJ8-B_1Nzkt7Vc |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2024_110200 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00432_025_06145_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12094_024_03781_1 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.039 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149 10.1056/NEJMoa1905287 10.5732/cjc.010.10547 10.1200/JCO.20.03237 10.2147/CMAR.S179139 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.009 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104478 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0388 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040 10.1186/s13014-014-0268-5 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.022 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6005 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.029 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.023 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70126-9 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C 10.2147/OTT.S133917 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4119 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01123-5 10.1002/ijc.32099 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.3863 10.1186/1748-717X-9-56 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.018 10.1002/cncr.25754 10.18632/oncotarget.8828 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.110 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.3675 10.1093/annonc/mdy249 10.3322/caac.21388 10.3322/caac.21609 10.1002/cncr.30198 10.3389/fonc.2019.01343 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2023. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7X7 7XB 88E 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s13014-023-02247-y |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1748-717X |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d PMC10074656 A744465930 37020312 10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 82203966 – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 81872469 – fundername: Guangdong Provincial Medical Science and Technology Research Fund grantid: A2022355 – fundername: ; grantid: 82203966; 81872469 – fundername: ; grantid: A2022355 |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 29P 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE I-F IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7QO 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC DWQXO FR3 K9. P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-b1036fb82b6226ea803914d739022b01cbc7233f2386f2b9171de208b03a9dd13 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1748-717X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:26:06 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:38:26 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 07:41:59 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 02:19:35 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:42:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:23:31 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:48 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:39:32 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:07 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Prognostication Toxicity Concurrent chemotherapy |
Language | English |
License | 2023. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-b1036fb82b6226ea803914d739022b01cbc7233f2386f2b9171de208b03a9dd13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2803069516?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 37020312 |
PQID | 2803069516 |
PQPubID | 55355 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10074656 proquest_miscellaneous_2797144581 proquest_journals_2803069516 gale_infotracmisc_A744465930 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A744465930 pubmed_primary_37020312 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13014_023_02247_y |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-04-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-04-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2023 text: 2023-04-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Radiation oncology (London, England) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Radiat Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | 2247_CR39 W Xia (2247_CR10) 2019; 11 Y Chen (2247_CR8) 2021; 39 WF Li (2247_CR14) 2019; 145 2247_CR1 Z Yang (2247_CR19) 2015; 10 2247_CR3 SS Guo (2247_CR32) 2016; 7 W Xiao (2247_CR20) 2015; 51 Y Sun (2247_CR13) 2016; 17 Y Chen (2247_CR2) 2019; 394 K Kim (2247_CR22) 2017; 98 L Zhang (2247_CR6) 2005; 23 Y Zhang (2247_CR9) 2019; 381 2247_CR11 JD Cox (2247_CR31) 1995; 31 2247_CR33 C Xu (2247_CR16) 2019; 9 S Bentzen (2247_CR29) 2010; 76 2247_CR35 2247_CR12 J Yi (2247_CR7) 2014; 9 2247_CR27 SF Su (2247_CR24) 2011; 30 RL Hong (2247_CR34) 2018; 29 B Ma (2247_CR37) 2018; 36 AW Lee (2247_CR23) 2011; 98 L Ribassin-Majed (2247_CR17) 2017; 35 F Xue (2247_CR18) 2020; 100 C Hsu (2247_CR38) 2017; 35 J Miao (2247_CR30) 2020; 107 WW Xiao (2247_CR28) 2011; 117 P Blanchard (2247_CR4) 2015; 16 X Lan (2247_CR15) 2017; 10 W Fang (2247_CR36) 2018; 19 A Chan (2247_CR5) 2002; 20 2247_CR21 L Chen (2247_CR25) 2012; 13 2247_CR26 |
References_xml | – ident: 2247_CR11 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.039 – volume: 20 start-page: 2038 issue: 8 year: 2002 ident: 2247_CR5 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.149 – volume: 381 start-page: 1124 issue: 12 year: 2019 ident: 2247_CR9 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905287 – volume: 30 start-page: 565 issue: 8 year: 2011 ident: 2247_CR24 publication-title: Chin J Cancer doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10547 – volume: 39 start-page: 840 issue: 7 year: 2021 ident: 2247_CR8 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03237 – volume: 11 start-page: 9813 year: 2019 ident: 2247_CR10 publication-title: Cancer Manag Res doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S179139 – volume: 51 start-page: 363 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 2247_CR20 publication-title: Oral Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.009 – volume: 17 start-page: 1509 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 2247_CR13 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7 – volume: 100 start-page: 104478 year: 2020 ident: 2247_CR18 publication-title: Oral Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104478 – volume: 36 start-page: 1412 issue: 14 year: 2018 ident: 2247_CR37 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.0388 – volume: 394 start-page: 64 issue: 10192 year: 2019 ident: 2247_CR2 publication-title: Lancet (London, England) doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0 – volume: 76 start-page: S3 year: 2010 ident: 2247_CR29 publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040 – volume: 10 start-page: 4 year: 2015 ident: 2247_CR19 publication-title: Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0268-5 – ident: 2247_CR21 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.022 – volume: 19 start-page: 1338 issue: 10 year: 2018 ident: 2247_CR36 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30495-9 – ident: 2247_CR35 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6005 – volume: 107 start-page: 672 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 2247_CR30 publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.029 – volume: 13 start-page: 163 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 2247_CR25 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70320-5 – volume: 98 start-page: 15 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 2247_CR23 publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.023 – volume: 16 start-page: 645 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 2247_CR4 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70126-9 – volume: 31 start-page: 1341 issue: 5 year: 1995 ident: 2247_CR31 publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C – ident: 2247_CR39 – volume: 10 start-page: 3853 year: 2017 ident: 2247_CR15 publication-title: Onco Targets Ther doi: 10.2147/OTT.S133917 – volume: 35 start-page: 498 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2247_CR17 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4119 – ident: 2247_CR26 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01123-5 – volume: 145 start-page: 295 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 2247_CR14 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.32099 – ident: 2247_CR12 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.007 – volume: 23 start-page: 8461 issue: 33 year: 2005 ident: 2247_CR6 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.3863 – volume: 9 start-page: 56 year: 2014 ident: 2247_CR7 publication-title: Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-56 – volume: 98 start-page: 996 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 2247_CR22 publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.018 – volume: 117 start-page: 1874 issue: 9 year: 2011 ident: 2247_CR28 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.25754 – volume: 7 start-page: 29739 issue: 20 year: 2016 ident: 2247_CR32 publication-title: Oncotarget doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8828 – ident: 2247_CR33 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.110 – volume: 35 start-page: 4050 issue: 36 year: 2017 ident: 2247_CR38 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.3675 – volume: 29 start-page: 1972 issue: 9 year: 2018 ident: 2247_CR34 publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy249 – ident: 2247_CR27 doi: 10.3322/caac.21388 – ident: 2247_CR1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21609 – ident: 2247_CR3 doi: 10.1002/cncr.30198 – volume: 9 start-page: 1343 year: 2019 ident: 2247_CR16 publication-title: Front Oncol doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01343 |
SSID | ssj0045309 |
Score | 2.3546963 |
Snippet | To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma... Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal... BackgroundTo analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal... Abstract Background To analysis the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone based on 10-year results for loco-regionally advanced... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 63 |
SubjectTerms | Biopsy Brain damage Cancer Care and treatment Chemoradiotherapy Chemoradiotherapy - methods Chemotherapy Cisplatin Clinical trials Concurrent chemotherapy Deafness Death Diagnosis Distribution Failure Follow-Up Studies Health hazards Heterogeneity Humans Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Magnetic resonance imaging Medical prognosis Metastasis Methods Mortality Nasopharyngeal cancer Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma - radiotherapy Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Neck Otitis Patient outcomes Patients Peripheral neuropathy Prognosis Prognostication Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Rank tests Retrospective Studies Risk Risk groups Soft tissues Statistical analysis Statistical models Statistical tests Subgroups Survival Temporal lobe Throat cancer Tomography Toxicity Tumor staging Xerostomia |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9JL6btu06JCoYciYj0sS72lJSEU0lMDuQmNbKcBxw7JLsXX_PLM2N5lTaG99GpJtqR5fDNY-oaxj5V3ttBGCRulEQYhUkCjktDaggetXFPSfefTH_bkzHw_L853Sn3RmbCJHnjauIM8j7WGMrcenHEVuJRkzG3SJT6zsiLvi5i3SaYmH2wKnfvNFRlnD24lZQ4C8UkQZpViWMDQyNb_p0_eAaXlgckdBDp-wh7PoSM_nKb8lD2ou2fs4en8c_w5uzsiOoiYBt43HNPcNFEvcRTLFQq6upwvWw08tn1XcwxXOUJZL6g4AwXkLbbMRwJ4F6m-QbwZugsMJXmikkNdfxW_4JDuQpBDxxe0bf9brK95nKlNXrCz46Of307EXGJBpMKalQCJCNaAU2AxDqujI8J4U5Xa4z5BLhOkUmndILDbRgHmdrKqVe4g19FXldQv2V6HU37NeAXQNGANQO1Nij56FbXC3LtwGlxTZ0xudjykmX-cymC0YcxDnA2TlAJKKYxSCkPGPm_HXE_sG3_t_ZUEue1JzNnjA9SnMOtT-Jc-ZewTqUEg-8bpodSmawq4SGLKCoelIY45r_OM7S96ol2mZfNGkcLsF24D1QLDTxfSZuzDtplG0lm3ru7X2Kf0Jaa5hZMZezXp3XZJuqQ_x1JlzC00crHmZUt3-WtkDZdjaZnCvvkfu_SWPVKjNaFRFftsb3Wzrt9hdLaC96Mh3gNC7Tdj priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1bi9UwEA7rCuKLeLe6SgTBB4k2TZqLILLKLotwfPLAvoUkbY8L3XY9ew7aV3-5M70ctrjsay5tkpnJN0OSbwh5U1ijciEzpjyXTAJEslBlkQmhgg0iM5XG986L7-pkKb-d5qd7ZEp3NC7g5bWhHeaTWq7r939-dZ_B4D_1Bm_Uh0uOcQED9GGISJp1t8htQCaNhrqQu1MFmYvUTg9nru03A6eew___nfoKVM2vUV7BpeP75N7oUNLDQQMekL2yeUjuLMYj80fk7xGSRPjY0baiEPzGgZCJgrDOQfzF2fgEq6O-bpuSghNLAeBahikb0E2voWa8KEAbj1kP_LprVuBg0oiJiJr23H-ELs2K4TYPH6jr9jfbXlA_Ep48Jsvjox9fT9iYeIHFXMkNCxxwrQomCwq8s9IbpJGXhRYW1imkPIaoMyEqgHtVZQEiPl6UWWpCKrwtCi6ekP0GhvyM0CKEqgpKhlBaGb31NvMig4g8NyKYqkwIn1bcxZGVHJNj1K6PToxyg5QcSMn1UnJdQt7t-lwMnBw3tv6Cgty1RD7tvqBdr9xoni5NfSmCTpUNRpoimBi5T1UUGsoULxLyFtXAoR7C8EBqw-MFmCTyZ7lDLZF5zoo0IQezlmCtcV49KZKblN1hhjD4dc5VQl7vqrEn3oBrynYLbbTVEPzmhifk6aB3uykJjefJPEuImWnkbM7zmubsZ88lzvuEM7l6fvO4XpC7WW8nYC75AdnfrLflS_DGNuFVb2L_AJyYMqA priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: long-term follow-up analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020312 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2803069516 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2797144581 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10074656 https://doaj.org/article/00ae3b7069b848db8cc1a06c3770661d |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3Ni9QwFA-6C-JF_La6DhEEDxK2adI09SKzMssyMIuoC3MLSdqOC912nA9krv7lvtdmxi3CXqbQJEPS9528_B4h74tcq1TIhCnLJZNgIpmrEs-EUC53ItFVhvedZ5fq4kpO5-k8bLitQ1rlXid2irpoPe6Rn2IVpViBP6A-L38xrBqFp6uhhMZ9cozQZZjSlc0PAZdMRZzvL8podbrmGD8wsFIMLVfGdgNj1GH2_6-Zb5mmYdrkLTt0_pg8Cg4kHfcUf0Lulc1T8mAWjsifkT8TBIWwfkfbikKw63sAJgrEuQFyF9fhytWO2rptSgpOKwWD1jIs0YBueQ0tITGANharHNjVrlmAQ0k9Fh5q2hv7CYY0C4ZqHf6grtvfbLukNgCcPCdX55MfXy5YKLTAfKrkhjkOdqxyOnEKvLHSaoSNl0UmcvhOLube-SwRogLzrqrEQYTHizKJtYuFzYuCixfkqIEpvyK0cK6qnJLOlbn0Nrd5YkUCEXiqhdNVGRG-_-LGBxRyLIZRmy4a0cr0VDJAJdNRyewi8vEwZtljcNzZ-wwJeeiJ-Nndi3a1MEEcTRzbUrgMGMppqQunvec2Vl5k8E7xIiIfkA0MSjlMD6jWX1aARSJelhlnEpHmchFH5GTQE6TTD5v3jGSCdlibf7wckXeHZhyJGW9N2W6hT5ZnEOymmkfkZc93hyWJDM-PeRIRPeDIwZqHLc31zw47nHcFZlL1-u55vSEPk05OQFzSE3K0WW3Lt-B9bdyoE7EROR6Pp9-n8DybXH79Nur2MuB3JvVfyo80Mw |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZGJwEviDuBAUYC8YCsJXbiOEgIbdCpY2uF0CbtzbOdpEzqktK1mvLKD-I3ck4uZRHS3vYa25Gdc4_t7yPkbZooGYmQM2mCkIUQIpnNuWNCSJtYwVUe433n8USOjsNvJ9HJBvnT3YXBY5WdT6wddVo6_Ee-jSxKvoR8QH6e_2LIGoW7qx2FRqMWB1l1CSXbxaf9ryDfd5zvDY--jFjLKsBcJMMlswE47dwqbiWkHplRiJEepjEU_5xbP3DWxVyIHGKZzLmFciZIM-4r6wuTpGkg4L23yGYooJQZkM3d4eT7j873h5Hwk-5qjpLbFwFWLAziIsNYGbOqF_5qloD_Y8GVYNg_qHkl8u3dJ_falJXuNDr2gGxkxUNye9xuyj8iv4cIQ2FcRcucQnntGsgnCupwDgqWnrWXvCpqZmWRUUiTKYTQkiEpBBYCM2hpjyLQwiCvgllUxRRSWOqQ6qgoz81HGFJMGQYSeMFsVl6y1ZyaFlLlMTm-ESE8IYMCpvyM0NTaPLcytDZLQmcSk3AjONT8kRJW5ZlHgu6La9finiP9xkzX9Y-SupGSBinpWkq68siH9Zh5g_pxbe9dFOS6JyJ21w_KxVS3DkD7vsmEjUGFrQpVapVzgfGlEzE8k0HqkfeoBhr9CkwPpNZcj4BFIkKX3olDxLZLhO-RrV5P8Aeu39wpkm790YX-Zz0eebNuxpF4xq7IyhX0iZMYyutIBR552ujdekkixh3rgHtE9TSyt-Z-S3H2s0YrD2pKm0g-v35er8md0dH4UB_uTw5ekLu8thkwnWiLDJaLVfYScr-lfdUaHCWnN23jfwHE92uH |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+of+concurrent+chemoradiotherapy+alone+for+loco-regionally+advanced+nasopharyngeal+carcinoma%3A+long-term+follow-up+analysis&rft.jtitle=Radiation+oncology+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=An-An%2C+Xu&rft.au=Jing-Jing+Miao&rft.au=Wang%2C+Lin&rft.au=An-Chuan%2C+Li&rft.date=2023-04-05&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13014-023-02247-y |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon |