Using artificial intelligence to identify patients with migraine and associated symptoms and conditions within electronic health records
Real-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications-is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability i...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC medical informatics and decision making Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 121 - 8 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
14.07.2023
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Real-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications-is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions.
"Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square.
Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001).
Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background Real-world evidence (RWE)--based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications--is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions. Methods "Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square. Results Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and [greater than or equal to] 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001). Conclusion Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. Keywords: Migraine, Real-world evidence, Electronic health records, Observational study BackgroundReal-world evidence (RWE)—based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications—is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes “structured data” in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and “unstructured data” as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions.Methods“Traditional RWE” approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and “Advanced RWE” approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square.ResultsCompared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5–88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001).ConclusionUnstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. Real-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications-is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions. "Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square. Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001). Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. Real-world evidence (RWE)--based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications--is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions. "Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square. Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and [greater than or equal to] 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001). Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. Abstract Background Real-world evidence (RWE)—based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications—is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes “structured data” in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and “unstructured data” as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions. Methods “Traditional RWE” approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and “Advanced RWE” approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square. Results Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5–88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001). Conclusion Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. Real-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications-is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions.BACKGROUNDReal-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and disease registries, and personal devices and health applications-is increasingly used to support healthcare decision making. There is variability in the collection of EHR data, which includes "structured data" in predefined fields (e.g., problem list, open claims, medication list, etc.) and "unstructured data" as free text or narrative. Healthcare providers are likely to provide more complete information as free text, but extracting meaning from these fields requires newer technologies and a rigorous methodology to generate higher-quality evidence. Herein, an approach to identify concepts associated with the presence and progression of migraine was developed and validated using the complete patient record in EHR data, including both the structured and unstructured portions."Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square.METHODS"Traditional RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from structured EHR fields and extraction using structured queries) and "Advanced RWE" approaches (i.e., capture from unstructured EHR data and processing by artificial intelligence [AI] technology, including natural language processing and AI-based inference) were evaluated against a manual chart abstraction reference standard for data collected from a tertiary care setting. The primary endpoint was recall; differences were compared using chi square.Compared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001).RESULTSCompared with manual chart abstraction, recall for migraine and headache were 66.6% and 29.6%, respectively, for Traditional RWE, and 96.8% and 92.9% for Advanced RWE; differences were statistically significant (absolute differences, 30.2% and 63.3%; P < 0.001). Recall of 6 migraine-associated symptoms favored Advanced RWE over Traditional RWE to a greater extent (absolute differences, 71.5-88.8%; P < 0.001). The difference between traditional and advanced techniques for recall of migraine medications was less pronounced, approximately 80% for Traditional RWE and ≥ 98% for Advanced RWE (P < 0.001).Unstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine.CONCLUSIONUnstructured EHR data, processed using AI technologies, provides a more credible approach to enable RWE in migraine than using structured EHR and claims data alone. An algorithm was developed that could be used to further study and validate the use of RWE to support diagnosis and management of patients with migraine. |
| ArticleNumber | 121 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Shroff, Anand Hindiyeh, Nada A. Smith, Timothy Riskin, Daniel Cady, Roger Kymes, Steven |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel surname: Riskin fullname: Riskin, Daniel – sequence: 2 givenname: Roger surname: Cady fullname: Cady, Roger – sequence: 3 givenname: Anand surname: Shroff fullname: Shroff, Anand – sequence: 4 givenname: Nada A. surname: Hindiyeh fullname: Hindiyeh, Nada A. – sequence: 5 givenname: Timothy surname: Smith fullname: Smith, Timothy – sequence: 6 givenname: Steven surname: Kymes fullname: Kymes, Steven |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452338$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsUuJLYmeFqopLpUps6Nry2CcZjxJ7sD2geQMemzMzLXQqhKIo1vH_f875fc6rkxADVNVr2lxSqrr3mbKe0rphHF_aN7V6Vp1RIVnd9UKePFqfVuc5r5qGSsXbF9Upl6JlnKuz6tdd9mEkJhU_eOvNRHwoME1-hGCBlEi8g4CbW7I2xeMyk5--LMnsx2R8AGKCIybniOYCjuTtvC5xzvu6jcH54mM4mHwgMIEtKQZvyRLMhKAENiaXX1bPBzNleHX_vajuPn38dv2lvv36-eb66ra2bSdK3S_soJhVUsqmMbwX3UItFAgnW9P2xkELPRUUGgFSqMYKIaxpFOU9ZxQGxi-qmwPXRbPS6-Rnk7Y6Gq_3hZhGvQvDTqCtYwoTBOaEFYxJ1SuBqGGQjneOtsj6cGCtN4sZnMV0kpmOoMc7wS_1GH9o2nDRC6GQ8O6ekOL3DeSiZ58t5m8CxE3WTHHFBP4-R-nbJ9JV3KSAWe1Vsm072f5VjQY78GGIeLDdQfWVbCVjXSM6VF3-Q4WPg9njpcHgsX5kePO40z8tPgwSCtRBYFPMOcGgrS9md_VI9hN2rHczqw8zq3Fm9X5m9c7Knlgf6P8x_QZR0e8C |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_62087_hpr_2024_0024 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14010085 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_024_01272_0 crossref_primary_10_1097_EDE_0000000000001803 crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2024_004120 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13023_024_03042_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_024_01297_5 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000788 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.006 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00186.x 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y 10.1093/jamia/ocz119 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000557 10.1093/jamia/ocw013 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011 10.1177/1740774520905576 10.1002/cpt.946 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216 10.1186/s10194-020-1077-x 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4 10.1177/0333102417738202 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2023. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2023 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2023 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 8AL 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M0T M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-023-02190-8 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Biological Sciences Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Biological Science Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health Management ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1472-6947 |
| EndPage | 8 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_cd28472e2d4c42278984081ff7d36d15 PMC10349448 A757226046 37452338 10_1186_s12911_023_02190_8 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GeographicLocations | United States United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: United States--US |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: R44 TR002437 – fundername: ; – fundername: ; grantid: R44TR002437 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF M0N NPM PMFND 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-9bcf82c877700a3946b8b8e4d75a59ade5e9141e04e7480c444ca08139321ef23 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1472-6947 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:18:10 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:36:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:39:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:48:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:31:46 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:27:26 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:46:14 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:05:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:02 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Observational study Electronic health records Migraine Real-world evidence |
| Language | English |
| License | 2023. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-9bcf82c877700a3946b8b8e4d75a59ade5e9141e04e7480c444ca08139321ef23 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12911-023-02190-8 |
| PMID | 37452338 |
| PQID | 2838755675 |
| PQPubID | 42572 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cd28472e2d4c42278984081ff7d36d15 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10349448 proquest_miscellaneous_2838248133 proquest_journals_2838755675 gale_infotracmisc_A757226046 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A757226046 pubmed_primary_37452338 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12911_023_02190_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_023_02190_8 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-07-14 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-07-14 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2023 text: 2023-07-14 day: 14 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC medical informatics and decision making |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Med Inform Decis Mak |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | TKJ Groenhof (2190_CR17) 2020; 118 T Hernandez-Boussard (2190_CR1) 2019; 26 MA Korolainen (2190_CR18) 2020; 21 2190_CR11 MS Levenson (2190_CR4) 2020; 17 LP Garrison (2190_CR10) 2007; 10 A Parsons (2190_CR12) 2012; 19 RE Sherman (2190_CR6) 2019; 375 A Singer (2190_CR13) 2016; 23 RA Miksad (2190_CR7) 2018; 103 L Blonde (2190_CR8) 2018; 35 A Wright (2190_CR14) 2015; 84 Headache Classification Committee o (2190_CR16) 2018; 38 AJ Camm (2190_CR2) 2018; 5 2190_CR3 SS Dhruva (2190_CR9) 2018; 43 GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators (2190_CR15) 2018; 17 2190_CR5 |
| References_xml | – volume: 5 start-page: e000788 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR2 publication-title: Open Heart doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000788 – ident: 2190_CR11 doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86 – volume: 118 start-page: 100 year: 2020 ident: 2190_CR17 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.006 – volume: 10 start-page: 326 year: 2007 ident: 2190_CR10 publication-title: Value in Health doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00186.x – volume: 35 start-page: 1763 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR8 publication-title: Adv Ther doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y – ident: 2190_CR5 – volume: 26 start-page: 1189 year: 2019 ident: 2190_CR1 publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz119 – volume: 19 start-page: 604 year: 2012 ident: 2190_CR12 publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000557 – volume: 23 start-page: 1107 year: 2016 ident: 2190_CR13 publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw013 – volume: 84 start-page: 784 year: 2015 ident: 2190_CR14 publication-title: Int J Med Informatics doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011 – volume: 17 start-page: 377 year: 2020 ident: 2190_CR4 publication-title: Clin Trails doi: 10.1177/1740774520905576 – volume: 103 start-page: 202 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR7 publication-title: Clin Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1002/cpt.946 – volume: 43 start-page: 464 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR9 publication-title: P & T – volume: 17 start-page: 954 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR15 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3 – volume: 375 start-page: 2293 year: 2019 ident: 2190_CR6 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216 – volume: 21 start-page: 8 year: 2020 ident: 2190_CR18 publication-title: J Headache Pain doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-1077-x – ident: 2190_CR3 doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4 – volume: 38 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2190_CR16 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202 |
| SSID | ssj0017835 |
| Score | 2.3851175 |
| Snippet | Real-world evidence (RWE)-based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and... Background Real-world evidence (RWE)--based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases,... Real-world evidence (RWE)--based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product and... BackgroundReal-world evidence (RWE)—based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing databases, product... Abstract Background Real-world evidence (RWE)—based on information obtained from sources such as electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 121 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Analysis Annotations Artificial Intelligence Care and treatment Charts Clinical medicine Computational linguistics Datasets Decision making Diagnosis Disease Electronic Health Records Electronic medical records Electronic records Headache Headaches Health aspects Health care Humans Insurance claims Language processing Medical records Methods Migraine Migraine Disorders - diagnosis Migraine Disorders - therapy Natural language interfaces Natural Language Processing Observational studies Observational study Patients Real-world evidence Recall Signs and symptoms Statistical analysis Structured data Unstructured data |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlh9BLafp0mwYVCj0UE0say_IxCQmhkJ4ayE3Iktwaut4QO4f8g_7sjh67XVNoL71aI_A8pJmRNN8Q8sEwD20FtjS2tyVYo0rjoSotdDXrJBiIFXJXX-TlNXy-qW92Wn2FN2EJHjgJ7ti6sIFyzx1YiHWbmJIo1veNE9LF8nKOPm-TTOX7g3CesSmRUfJ4Qq8WjgJ5uLOMxdMLNxTR-v_ck3ec0vLB5I4HunhKnuTQkZ6kXz4gj_z4jOxf5cvx5-RnvP6ngaUEC0GHHbxNOq_pEKty-wea0VQnGo5h6Wr4FhpFeGpGR03Wl3d0eljdzuvVFL9j3uzS8644aRjp7w46NFVT0nTiM70g1xfnX88uy9xoobS1hLlsO9srbgM0YFUZ0YLsVKc8uKY2dWucr33LgPkKfAOqsgCoVFSCwOCP-Z6Ll2RvXI_-NaFOWSOt7JnhSI3pijC9aAAwDqys51AQtpG7thmFPDTD-KFjNqKkTrrSqCsddaVVQT5t59wmDI6_Up8GdW4pA352_IBWpbNV6X9ZVUE-BmPQYZXj71mTixWQyYCXpU-ausHAtQJZkMMFJa5OuxzemJPOu8OkMaTDNLHGXK0g77fDYWZ48Tb69X2i4YAyFgV5laxvyxIKtOZCIKtqYZcLnpcj4_A9YoeziEcE6s3_kNJb8pjHNdWUDA7J3nx3799hjDZ3R3E5_gIa8TjD priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Pi9UwEA-6gngR_1tdJYLgQco26SRNT7KKz0VYTy7sLaRJuj7wtc9t97DfwI_tJM3rviLstZlAk5nJTCYzvyHkvWEe6gJsbmxrc7BG5cZDkVtoBGskGIgVcqc_5MkZfD8X5yngNqS0yt2ZGA9q19sQIz9CM4iutUD_9tP2Tx66RoXX1dRC4y65x9DShJQutfo2vyKEqMauUEbJowFtWwgI8vByGUuoF8YoYvb_fzLvmaZl2uSeHVo9Ig-TA0mPJ44_Jnd894TcP01P5E_J35gEQINETOAQdL2HuknHnq5jbW57TROm6kBDMJZu1hehXYSnpnPUJK55R4frzXbsN0P8jrdnNyV5xUnrjt700aFTTSWd4j7DM3K2-vrzy0me2i3kVkgY87qxreI2AAQWhSlrkI1qlAdXCSNq47zwNQPmC_AVqMICIGvRoyjRBWS-5eVzctD1nX9JqFPWSCtbZjhS46WlNG1ZAaA3WFjPISNst-_aJizy0BLjt453EiX1xCuNvNKRV1pl5OM8ZzshcdxK_Tmwc6YMKNrxQ395oZNSauuCceaeO7AQa4LxuqtY21aulI6JjHwIwqCDruPvWZNKFnCRATVLH1eiQve1AJmRwwUl6qhdDu_ESaczYtA3Ep2Rd_NwmBny3jrfX000HHCPy4y8mKRvXhJuqOBliUtVC7lcrHk50q1_RQRxFlGJQL26_b9ekwc8akuVMzgkB-PllX-DPtjYvI2K9g9Y_zFN priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Using artificial intelligence to identify patients with migraine and associated symptoms and conditions within electronic health records |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452338 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2838755675 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2838248133 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10349448 https://doaj.org/article/cd28472e2d4c42278984081ff7d36d15 |
| Volume | 23 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swED_6AaUvY9_z1gUNBnsY3iz7bCsPYzSlWRmkjLJA2IuQZbkzNE4Xp7D8B_uzd5LtNKbdXvxgnUKku_N9SPc7gLeKGxwGqH2lC-2jVsJXBgNfYxbzLEGFrkJucp6cTfHrLJ7tQNfuqN3A-t7QzvaTmi6vPvz-tf5MCv_JKbxIPtZks2yiL7Qnkq40ehf2yTKltqPBBG9PFWyWoyucuXfeIRxEKVJsZstVtuyUg_O_-9Heslr9G5VbJmr8EB60viU7boThEeyY6jEcTNrT8yfwx90PYFZYGtwIVm4BcrLVgpWubLdYsxZutWY2T8vm5aXtJGGYqnKmWoaanNXr-fVqMa_dewqs8-b-l5tUVuy2xQ5ryi1ZkxKqn8J0fPr95MxvOzH4Ok5w5Q8zXYhQW-zAIFDREJNMZMJgnsYqHqrcxGbIkZsATYoi0IjEdXI2IvIOuSnC6BnsVYvKvACWC60SnRRchURN8UykCtpzJEcx0CZED3i371K3MOW2W8aVdOGKSGTDNklsk45tUnjwfjPnugHp-C_1yLJzQ2kBtt2LxfJStvoqdW7tdmjCHDW6cmGKhAUvijSPkpzHHryzwiCtYNLf06qtZqBFWkAteZzGKXm2ASYeHPUoSX11f7gTJ9lJvySfj-LImII5D95shu1MeyWuMoubhiZE2uPIg-eN9G2W1AmxB6Inl70190eq8qcDF-cOsAjFy3_-6Cs4DJ3OpD7HI9hbLW_Ma_LMVtkAdtNZSk8x_jKA_dHp-beLgctyDJwi0vNi9OMvDME5mg |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqIgEXxJtAASOBOKCosTNJvAeEymPZ0m5PrdSbcRynrMQmS7MV2n_Ar-E3MuMk242Qeus1tqWMZzwPe-Ybxl4b4WAUgQ2NLW0I1qjQOIhCC3ki8hQM-Aq56VE6OYFvp8npFvvb18JQWmWvE72iLmpLd-S7aAbRtU7Qv_2w-BVS1yh6Xe1baLRiceBWvzFka97vf0b-vpFy_OX40yTsugqENklhGY5yWyppCQcvikw8gjRXuXJQZIlJRqZwiRsJEC4Cl4GKLABSgIYzRk9HuJKADlDl34AYLTlVpo-_rl8t6BalL8xR6W6DtpQuICW9lPqS7YHx8z0C_rcEG6ZwmKa5YffGd9mdzmHle62E3WNbrrrPbk67J_kH7I9POuAkgS0YBZ9toHzyZc1nvha4XPEOw7XhdPnL57Mzak_huKkKbjopcQVvVvPFsp43_jtG60WbVOYXzSp-2beHtzWcvL1nah6yk2thxCO2XdWVe8J4oaxJbVoKI3E2BkmxKeMMAL3PyDoJARP9vmvbYZ9TC46f2sdAKtUtrzTySnteaRWwd-s1ixb548rZH4md65mE2u0_1OdnulMC2hbkDEgnC7Dga5AxvFaiLLMiTguRBOwtCYMm3YK_Z01XIoFEEkqX3suSDN3lCNKA7Qxmok6ww-FenHSnkxp9eYIC9mo9TCspz65y9UU7RwLucRywx630rUnCDU1kHCOpaiCXA5qHI9Xsh0csFx4FCdTTq__rJbs1OZ4e6sP9o4Nn7Lb0JycLBeyw7eX5hXuO_t8yf-EPHWffr_uU_wOau2z1 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+artificial+intelligence+to+identify+patients+with+migraine+and+associated+symptoms+and+conditions+within+electronic+health+records&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+informatics+and+decision+making&rft.au=Riskin%2C+Daniel&rft.au=Cady%2C+Roger&rft.au=Shroff%2C+Anand&rft.au=Hindiyeh%2C+Nada+A&rft.date=2023-07-14&rft.eissn=1472-6947&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12911-023-02190-8&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F37452338&rft.externalDocID=37452338 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |