Statistical methods for exploring spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host factor interactions

Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC medical research methodology Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 71 - 13
Main Authors Lu, Zhiyuan, Suzuki, Ayako, Wang, Dong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 27.03.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking. In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes. The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug. Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
AbstractList Abstract Background Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking. Methods In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes. Results The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug. Conclusion Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking.BACKGROUNDDrug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking.In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes.METHODSIn this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes.The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug.RESULTSThe simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug.Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.CONCLUSIONThough spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking. In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes. The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug. Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
BackgroundDrug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking.MethodsIn this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes.ResultsThe simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug.ConclusionThough spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking. In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes. The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug. Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events.
Background Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug properties (i.e., drug-host interaction). This concept is crucial for personalized drug safety but remains under-studied, primarily due to methodological challenges and limited data availability. By monitoring a large volume of adverse event reports in the postmarket stage, spontaneous adverse event reporting systems provide an unparalleled resource of information for adverse events and could be utilized to explore risk disparities of specific adverse events by age, sex, and other host factors. However, well-formulated statistical methods to formally address such risk disparities are currently lacking. Methods In this paper, we present a statistical framework to explore spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host interactions and detect risk disparities in adverse drug events by various host factors, adapting methods for safety signal detection. We proposed four different methods, including likelihood ratio test, normal approximation test, and two tests using subgroup ratios. We applied our proposed methods to simulated data and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting Systems (FAERS) and explored sex-/age-disparities in reported liver events associated with specific drug classes. Results The simulation result demonstrates that two tests (likelihood ratio, normal approximation) can detect disparities in adverse drug events associated with host factors while controlling the family wise error rate. Application to real data on drug liver toxicity shows that the proposed method can be used to detect drugs with unusually high level of disparity regarding a host factor (sex or age) for liver toxicity or to determine whether an adverse event demonstrates a significant unbalance regarding the host factor relative to other events for the drug. Conclusion Though spontaneous adverse event reporting databases require careful data processing and inference, the sheer size of the databases with diverse data from different countries provides unique resources for exploring various questions for drug safety that are otherwise impossible to address. Our proposed methods can be used to facilitate future investigation on drug-host interactions in drug toxicity using a large number of reported adverse events. Keywords: Drug-host factor interactions, Likelihood ratio tests, FAERS, Postmarket surveillance, Spontaneous reporting adverse event databases
ArticleNumber 71
Audience Academic
Author Lu, Zhiyuan
Wang, Dong
Suzuki, Ayako
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zhiyuan
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Zhiyuan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ayako
  surname: Suzuki
  fullname: Suzuki, Ayako
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dong
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Dong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9Uktv1DAYjFARfcAf4IAiceGS4redE6oqHpUqcQDOluPYWa8SO7W9W_j3OE0p3QqhyIr1eWbsGc1pdeSDN1X1GoJzCAV7nyASnDQA4QZAIWhz-6w6gYTDBiEhjh7tj6vTlLYAQC4we1EdY9bysvBJdfMtq-xSdlqN9WTyJvSptiHW5uc8huj8UKc5-Ky8CbtUq35vYjK12Ruf62jmEPOC6VVWnUpm5fZxNzSbkHJtlc5l4Hw2sWxd8Oll9dyqMZlX9_-z6senj98vvzTXXz9fXV5cN5oykhtBe2UJxaazuGspQ1YroCyjAvUUGYzwYp4zBixvdXFqQQ863WHBIAGM4LPqatXtg9rKObpJxV8yKCfvBiEOUpXH69FI23IKOETQUk4soi0xGGOCrCWCIKSL1odVa951k-l1MR_VeCB6eOLdRg5hLyEApIROi8K7e4UYbnYmZTm5pM04rsFKxFtEASUMFOjbJ9Bt2EVfspJIAAwghAz-RQ2qOHDehnKxXkTlBSfl-QzBJYTzf6DK15vJ6VIn68r8gPDmsdMHi38aUwBoBegYUorGPkAgkEst5VpLWWop72opbwtJPCFpt_QuLGm58X_U31Gm5vM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2024_2338250
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_67050_5
crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2024_2392006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40268_023_00439_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2023_2293200
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40264_024_01404_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajoc_2024_102121
crossref_primary_10_37489_2588_0519_2024_3_40_54
Cites_doi 10.1002/pds.677
10.1177/2168479013514236
10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.004
10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.042
10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5651
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
10.1038/s41598-020-60053-y
10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.018
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01753.x
10.1038/sdata.2016.26
10.1590/S0100-879X1998000900002
10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10243
10.1007/s40264-020-00957-w
10.1080/00031305.1999.10474456
10.1080/10543406.2020.1783284
10.1080/10543406.2017.1295250
10.1126/scitranslmed.3003377
10.1371/journal.pone.0122786
10.1002/sim.6510
10.1002/sam.10078
10.1016/j.etp.2012.05.004
10.1002/pds.1001
10.1145/2110363.2110395
10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.016
10.1177/0962280216646678
10.1080/10543406.2013.736810
10.1007/s002280050466
10.1002/sim.2473
10.1007/s40264-022-01194-z
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12874-023-01885-w
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2288
EndPage 13
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f97507121f574f2594e33342ff48422c
PMC10041785
A743336214
36973693
10_1186_s12874_023_01885_w
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
MK0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-85daf453ebf3b9562fca0af6582d52e32328747660f79c147f0d0bcb386140643
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2288
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:42 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:38:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:25:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 08:36:35 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:35:33 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:48:34 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:44 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:31:00 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:40 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords FAERS
Postmarket surveillance
Spontaneous reporting adverse event databases
Drug-host factor interactions
Likelihood ratio tests
Language English
License 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c564t-85daf453ebf3b9562fca0af6582d52e32328747660f79c147f0d0bcb386140643
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12874-023-01885-w
PMID 36973693
PQID 2803011161
PQPubID 42579
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f97507121f574f2594e33342ff48422c
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10041785
proquest_miscellaneous_2792505460
proquest_journals_2803011161
gale_infotracmisc_A743336214
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743336214
pubmed_primary_36973693
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_023_01885_w
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12874_023_01885_w
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-03-27
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-03-27
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-03-27
  day: 27
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC medical research methodology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Med Res Methodol
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References L Huang (1885_CR4) 2013; 23
F Bessone (1885_CR25) 2010; 16
A Bate (1885_CR9) 1998; 54
K Nam (1885_CR6) 2017; 27
GN Norén (1885_CR11) 2006; 25
L Sandberg (1885_CR15) 2020; 43
G Casella (1885_CR20) 2011
S Tiwari (1885_CR30) 2020; 10
M Fusaroli (1885_CR26) 2022; 45
J Hopstadius (1885_CR16) 2012
O Caster (1885_CR13) 2010; 3
N George (1885_CR17) 2018; 94
M Chen (1885_CR19) 2015; 63
I Campesi (1885_CR28) 2013; 65
Y Benjamini (1885_CR22) 1995; 57
MAC Benedito (1885_CR29) 1998; 31
M Mennecozzi (1885_CR18) 2015; 10
KJ Rothman (1885_CR2) 2004; 13
Y Zhao (1885_CR8) 2018; 27
L Huang (1885_CR3) 2011; 106
W DuMouchel (1885_CR10) 1999; 53
NP Tatonetti (1885_CR14) 2012; 4
F Bretz (1885_CR21) 2011
L Huang (1885_CR5) 2014; 48
Z Xu (1885_CR7) 2021; 31
A Suzuki (1885_CR24) 2015; 72
I Meineke (1885_CR31) 2003; 55
N Hu (1885_CR12) 2015; 34
JB Rubin (1885_CR27) 2018; 16
JM Banda (1885_CR23) 2016; 3
SJ Evans (1885_CR1) 2001; 10
References_xml – volume: 10
  start-page: 483
  year: 2001
  ident: 1885_CR1
  publication-title: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.
  doi: 10.1002/pds.677
– volume: 48
  start-page: 98
  year: 2014
  ident: 1885_CR5
  publication-title: Ther Innov Regul Sci.
  doi: 10.1177/2168479013514236
– volume: 72
  start-page: 481
  year: 2015
  ident: 1885_CR24
  publication-title: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.004
– volume: 16
  start-page: 936
  year: 2018
  ident: 1885_CR27
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.042
– volume: 16
  start-page: 5651
  year: 2010
  ident: 1885_CR25
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol WJG.
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5651
– volume: 57
  start-page: 289
  year: 1995
  ident: 1885_CR22
  publication-title: J R Stat Soc Ser B.
  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 1885_CR30
  publication-title: Sci Rep.
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60053-y
– volume: 94
  start-page: 101
  year: 2018
  ident: 1885_CR17
  publication-title: Regul Toxicol Pharmacology.
  doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.018
– volume-title: Statistical Inference
  year: 2011
  ident: 1885_CR20
– volume: 55
  start-page: 32
  year: 2003
  ident: 1885_CR31
  publication-title: British J Clin Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01753.x
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1885_CR23
  publication-title: Sci Data.
  doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.26
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1113
  year: 1998
  ident: 1885_CR29
  publication-title: Braz J Med Biol Res.
  doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X1998000900002
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1230
  year: 2011
  ident: 1885_CR3
  publication-title: J Am Stat Assoc.
  doi: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10243
– volume-title: Multiple Comparisons Using R
  year: 2011
  ident: 1885_CR21
– volume: 43
  start-page: 999
  year: 2020
  ident: 1885_CR15
  publication-title: Drug Saf.
  doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00957-w
– volume: 53
  start-page: 177
  year: 1999
  ident: 1885_CR10
  publication-title: Am Stat.
  doi: 10.1080/00031305.1999.10474456
– volume: 31
  start-page: 37
  year: 2021
  ident: 1885_CR7
  publication-title: J Biopharm Stat.
  doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1783284
– volume: 27
  start-page: 990
  year: 2017
  ident: 1885_CR6
  publication-title: J Biopharm Stat.
  doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1295250
– volume: 4
  start-page: 125
  year: 2012
  ident: 1885_CR14
  publication-title: Sci Transl Med.
  doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003377
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0122786
  year: 2015
  ident: 1885_CR18
  publication-title: PloS ONE.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122786
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2725
  year: 2015
  ident: 1885_CR12
  publication-title: Stat Med.
  doi: 10.1002/sim.6510
– volume: 3
  start-page: 197
  year: 2010
  ident: 1885_CR13
  publication-title: Stat Anal Data Min ASA Data Sci J.
  doi: 10.1002/sam.10078
– volume: 65
  start-page: 585
  year: 2013
  ident: 1885_CR28
  publication-title: Exp Toxicol Pathol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2012.05.004
– volume: 13
  start-page: 519
  year: 2004
  ident: 1885_CR2
  publication-title: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.
  doi: 10.1002/pds.1001
– start-page: 265
  volume-title: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT international health informatics symposium
  year: 2012
  ident: 1885_CR16
  doi: 10.1145/2110363.2110395
– volume: 63
  start-page: 503
  year: 2015
  ident: 1885_CR19
  publication-title: J Hepatol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.016
– volume: 27
  start-page: 876
  year: 2018
  ident: 1885_CR8
  publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res.
  doi: 10.1177/0962280216646678
– volume: 23
  start-page: 178
  year: 2013
  ident: 1885_CR4
  publication-title: J Biopharm Stat.
  doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.736810
– volume: 54
  start-page: 315
  year: 1998
  ident: 1885_CR9
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Pharmacol.
  doi: 10.1007/s002280050466
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3740
  year: 2006
  ident: 1885_CR11
  publication-title: Stat Med.
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2473
– volume: 45
  start-page: 891
  year: 2022
  ident: 1885_CR26
  publication-title: Drug Saf.
  doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01194-z
SSID ssj0017836
Score 2.4419434
Snippet Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific drug...
Background Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific...
BackgroundDrug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to specific...
Abstract Background Drug toxicity does not affect patients equally; the toxicity may only exert in patients who possess certain attributes of susceptibility to...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 71
SubjectTerms Adverse and side effects
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems
Age
Analysis
Computer Simulation
Contingency tables
Databases, Factual
Drug interactions
Drug-host factor interactions
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - epidemiology
Drugs
Expected values
FAERS
Health aspects
Humans
Hypotheses
Likelihood Functions
Likelihood ratio tests
Liver
Medical research
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Postmarket surveillance
Spontaneous reporting adverse event databases
Statistical methods
Surveillance
United States
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEB-kh-JF_Ha1SgqCBwndzfc71mIpQnuy0FvIZhMV5KlvX-m_70yy-3iLoBcP-w6bBDaZmcxvXia_AXgrkw6D1JnLGA1XUSYeLP6g6xzQwJTRmf7vuLwyF9fq042-2Sv1RTlhlR64LtxJXlmCLKLL2qqMYF0lKaUSOSunhIi0-6LPm4Op6fyA7ibMV2ScORk7onXn6J8wdHZO87uFGyps_X_uyXtOaZkwueeBzh_Cgwk6stP6yY_gXlo_hsPL6XD8Cfwi4Fh4l7FXrQw9MsSkLM15dozyYRENJgz3WaBSzGNihcKJ1bMD6kM5o-Tb6thhc_uF000QVivzMOKX2NTbEONTuD7_-Pnsgk8VFXjURm2500PISsvUZ9ljZCRyDG3IiELEoEWSCK9wnawxbbar2Cmb26HtYy8denECL8_gYP1jnV4AEyF2MqqYBgzJbB9WnWujErbPOqOMUwPdvMA-TnTjVPXiuy9hhzO-CsWjUHwRir9r4P1uzM9KtvHX3h9IbrueRJRdXqD6-El9_L_Up4F3JHVP5oyfF8N0KwEnScRY_hQRlkQn36kGjhY90QzjsnnWGz9tA6On0l-4gSKqbuB410wjKbWtSNsTgyPCUGXaBp5XNdtNSZqVxUc24BYKuJjzsmX97WshCScmQDQD_fJ_rNIruC-K8Ugu7BEcbDe36TWCsW3_ptjdb8A1L8s
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9wwEB7aFEovpekrzqOoUOihiNh6ek8lDQmhkJ4a2JuwZSktlN1kvSF_vzOy7MYUclgfVhJYHo3mG2nmG4BPMuimkzpy6b3hysvAG4sPNJ0dKpgyOtJ5x-UPc3Glvi_1Mh-49TmsctwT00bdrT2dkR9TFSWqi26qrze3nKpG0e1qLqHxFJ4RdRmtarucHK6KMhTGRJnaHPcVkbtztFLoQNe15vczY5Q4-__fmR-YpnnY5AM7dP4KXmYAyU4Gie_Ck7B6Dc8v8xX5G7gl-JjYl7HXUB-6Z4hMWRij7RhFxSImDOj0s4YKMveBJSInNtwgUB-KHCULN4ztNnfXnPJB2FCfhxHLxGbIiejfwtX52c_TC57rKnCvjdryWndNVFqGNsoW_SMRfVM2EbGI6LQIEkEWfidrTBntwlfKxrIrW9_KGm05QZh3sLNar8IeMNH4SnrlQ4eOmW2bRVWXXgnbRh1R0qGAavzAzmfScap98ccl56M2bhCKQ6G4JBR3X8CXaczNQLnxaO9vJLepJ9Flpz_Wm2uXtc_FhSXcK6qorYro8akgpVQiRlUrIXwBn0nqjpQaX883OTcBJ0n0WO4EcZZEU1-pAg5nPVEZ_bx5XDcubwa9-7d0C_g4NdNICnBL0nbE44hgVJmygPfDMpumJM3C4k8WUM8W4GzO85bV71-JKpz4AFEN9P7j73UAL0RSC8mFPYSd7eYuHCHY2rYfkkb9BclmKNs
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Statistical methods for exploring spontaneous adverse event reporting databases for drug-host factor interactions
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36973693
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2803011161
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2792505460
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10041785
https://doaj.org/article/f97507121f574f2594e33342ff48422c
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3da9swED_6AWMvY9_z1gUPBnsY2mx9WMrDGM1oKYOUURYIexG2LLWDkqxxQrf_fneyndWsjD3ED5EUR7o73-8s3e8AXguvylqowIRzBZNOeFZqvKDrrNHAZKECve-YnhYnM_l5ruY70Jc76hawuTW0o3pSs9Xlu59Xvz6iwX-IBm-K901OpO0MvQ8GxsYodr0L--iZNFU0mMo_uwqUsRCzjXTOODemT6K59TcGjiry-f_91L7htoZHKm_4qOP7cK8Dl-lhqw0PYMcvHsKdabd9_giuCFpGZmbs1daOblJEranvT-KldGIW8aJfbpq0pGLNjU8jyVPa7i5QHzpVSt6vHVuvNueMckXStnZPSgwUqzZfonkMs-Ojr59OWFdzgTlVyDUzqi6DVMJXQVQYO_HgyqwMiFN4rbgXCMBwnXRRZEGPHa5kyOqscpUw6OcJ3jyBvcVy4Z9BykuXCyedrzFo01U5zk3mJNdVUAG1wCeQ9wtsXUdITnUxLm0MTExhW6FYFIqNQrHXCbzdjvnR0nH8s_eE5LbtSVTa8Yvl6tx2lmnDWBMm5nlQWgaMBqUXQkgegjSSc5fAG5K6JRXEv-fKLm8BJ0nUWfYQMZhAGJDLBA4GPdFQ3bC51xvb67ml4mD4iEXcncCrbTONpMNvUdqWOB4RqMoiS-Bpq2bbKYlirPEjEjADBRzMediy-H4RacSJKxBNQj3_jxu_gLs82oZgXB_A3nq18S8Rja2rEezquR7B_uTo9MvZKL7TGEWzw-vZ5Ntvu_w03g
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEXxJtAASOBOCCriV_JHhAqj2pLuz210t5M4tgFCe22m12t-FP8RmacZGmE1FsPm8N6HMWZGX8z8TwA3kivy1rqwKVzhisnPS9zvCB01qhgyuhA3zsmx2Z8qr5N9XQL_vS5MBRW2e-JcaOu546-ke9SFyXqi26yj-cXnLpG0elq30KjFYtD_3uNLlvz4eAL8vetEPtfTz6PeddVgDtt1JIXui6D0tJXQVboHYjgyrQMiMSi1sJLNDEKtLGNSUM-cpnKQ1qnlatkgUhGAI73vQE3EXhTcvby6cbByygjok_MKcxuk9GdOKIiOuxFofl6AH6xR8D_SHAJCodhmpdwb_8e3O0MVrbXSth92PKzB3Br0h3JP4QLMldjtWekavtRNwwtYeb76D5GUbhog_r5qmElNYBuPIuFo1h7YkE0FKlKiNrOrRerM075J6ztB8SoqsWizcFoHsHptbzxx7A9m8_8U2CidJl0yvkaHcG8KkdZkTol8irogJLlE8j6F2xdV-Scem38stHZKYxtmWKRKTYyxa4TeL-Zc96W-LiS-hPxbUNJ5bnjH_PFme203YZRTna2yILOVUAPU3kppRIhqEIJ4RJ4R1y3tIng47myy4XARVI5LruHdp1E0yJTCewMKFH53XC4lxvbbT6N_acqCbzeDNNMCqiL3LZUNxKNX2XSBJ60YrZZkjSjHH8ygWIggIM1D0dmP3_E0uRUfxDVQD-7-rlewe3xyeTIHh0cHz6HOyKqiOQi34Ht5WLlX6Cht6xeRu1i8P261fkvCupkZg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical+methods+for+exploring+spontaneous+adverse+event+reporting+databases+for+drug-host+factor+interactions&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+research+methodology&rft.au=Lu%2C+Zhiyuan&rft.au=Suzuki%2C+Ayako&rft.au=Wang%2C+Dong&rft.date=2023-03-27&rft.issn=1471-2288&rft.eissn=1471-2288&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12874-023-01885-w&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2288&client=summon